. : tS + 4°45" spre
pebebeoeaear) ’ eres eit
yaa be peagh ro 7) ai 4° a ; other hts
4 1tie j 4 . Pye trate
4 "i? + i vert i
: ~ 4d ‘ [ i OO err rare
APE Cot ‘ : : ere UL ern ot
7 : 7 é PRP AARNE
aiicealttintteprnntnitanaaninn tannins Ramana E NN
ay ia : see yt eye fy a] weed
eee + :
} - ; ; ae
‘ = — ; is +33
z *; i * ; cot ot
ee ee i satel a
Steeles , : : ee, i
is fs o eee
: j : ; ’ 7 44 It)
it é a3 bere bred sad i'bs
ee ' + 44° brhreiers ; Derr Hits
Srhat on oot he) . aj 58 448 : , tts Pe oe) Sot ot bebe)
Ort oe oe oe: Cots ; CSU Pt bene rt be bt be be ear ast
OS, aig a i" : 5 j +3 . Hae aa)4 ties
isis
<
+ : “i +
agetas ete : tie
. ai : : oy yy : wis “i
+3 : ‘ if ory ‘ ve + ber aye ede me
; a4 . 43058 4
oo sri
444 e ot he |
+4") +
G58 roe
,
+
i
: ié :
Mi
‘
4 48
as ht aeiery
“1 N s
apes
me)
‘
a4)
4
a
ee
*
‘
of
i
a8
+
4 e
+ «
a
e &- 4
44
uy i
53 ay
3b bey
‘ a “ +
‘
St ts
~~ *
~~
ene
e+
h h@2TSoOoO TOEO O
MMA A
1IOHM/198W
Commonwealth of Australia.
DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND CUSTOMS.
Heel colteltenka tele:
Reo
Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out
by F.I.S. “Endeavour” 1909-10 under H. C. DanNnevie,
Commonwealth Director of Fisheries.
VOLUME-T
PUBLISHED BY DIRECTION OF THE MINISTERS FOR TRADE AND
Customs, Hon. FRANK GWYNNE TUDOR AND
Hon. LITTLETON E. GRoOomM.
SYDNEY, 1911-1914.
&
Tv -
r
«
«
os
= a = .
4 ew
‘
4
= . i
i
CONTENTS.
PART I.—PusuiisuEp 22ND Dxecemeper, 1911.
Page Plates
Report on the Fishes obtained by the F.I.8. ‘‘ Endeav-
our’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria,
South Australia, and Tasmania. Partl. By Allan
R. McCulloch ... ae oe 5s 385 ie 1 L.-XVI.
Report on the Mollusca obtained by the F. I. 8. ‘‘En-
deavour’’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia.
Part 1. By Charles Hedley ... bs st wis 90 XVII.-
, XX.
PART IJ.—PuBuisHEep 9TH JuLy, 1912.
Report on the Sponges obtained by the F.1I. 8. ‘*En-
deavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales,
Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tas-
mania. Partl. By. E.F.Hallmann _... sso AUN DO
PART IIJ.—PusuisHep 29TH Aucust, 1912.
A new Species of Asymmetron from the Great Austra-
lian Bight, South Australia. By Janet W. Raff... 304 XXXVII.
Report on a sample of Globigerina Ooze from 1122
fathoms, East of Tasmania. By F.Chapman ... 309
PART IV.—PusuisHEep 47TH Juty, 1914.
Title Page, Contents, and Index.
EIST SOR SHE CONTRIBUTORS:
With References and Catalogue Numbers.
Chapman, F.— 59.512 (26.5: 94.6).
Report on a Sample of Globigerina Ooze from 1122 fathoms, East
of Tasmania.
Zool. Res. End., i., 3, 1912.
Hallmann, E. F.— 59.54 (26.5: 94.2-5).
Report on the Sponges obtained by the F. I. 8. ‘‘ Endeavour’’ on
the Coasts of New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland,
and 'l'asmania. Part 1.
Zool. Res. End. 1., 2, 1912,
Hedley, Charles— 59.4 (26.5: 94.2).
teport on the Mollusca obtained by the F. I. S. ‘* Endeavour’’
chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia. Part 1.
Zool. Res. End. i., 1, 1911.
McCulloch, Allan R.— 59.7 (26.5: 94.2-6).
Report on the Fishes obtained by the F. I. 8. ‘‘ Endeavour’’ on the
Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and
Tasmania. Part 1.
Zool. Res. End., v., 1, 1911,
Raff, Janet W.— 59.71 (26.5: 94.2),
A New Species of Asymmetron from the Great Australian Bight.
Zool. Res. End., 1., 3, 1912.
‘snoumuolp—, ATWO[ ol, pod URID0 Atoyy UT
dodf OYZ PUL BULTPLS oy} oto LOY]
‘Ajoy guq ‘poydeuun yods VW
ROS UOT ‘OUOT 944 UO ST o1OTLY, ,.
Sn Memoriam
“Had I been any god of power, I would
Have sunk the sea within the earth or ere
It should the good ship so have swallowd and
The fraughting souls within her.”—The Tempest.
H. C. DANNEVIG, DIREcTOoR ;
G. W. C. PIM, Masrsr ;
C. T. HARRISSON, Browoeist ;
And eighteen others, comprising the crew of the
F.LS. ‘‘ Endeavour,’ who were lost at sea
December, 1914.
The pages of this Part are numbered in Roman numerals to
enable the reader to insert the letterpress in any position
in Vol. ILI. he may think fit.
HARALD CHRISTIAN DANNEVIG,
DIRECTOR,
and the Work and Loss of the BsS. 7 Endeavour.”
“There dwells a wife by the Northern Gate,
And a wealthy wife is she ;
She breeds a breed 0’ rovin’ men
And casts them oversea.”—Kipling.
On 20th November, 1914, the Fisheries Investigation ship
left Hobart for Macquarie Island. She arrived there on Ist
December, and, after a delay of two days occasioned by bad
weather. fulfilled her mission of relieving an operator at the
Wireless Station. She started on her return journey on 3rd
December.
A brief view by the solitary officers stationed at the island
of the staunch little ship as she disappeared into the sea mists,
a terrific gale two days later, and that, perhaps, is all we
shall ever know of the end of our friend, Harald Dannevig,
who, in his knowledge of the mysteries of the sea knew no
superior ; of Captain Pim, a capable navigator, whose pre-
vious career in tropical seas knew every resource of defence
from storm or danger; and of a good and true ship’s
company. The sea has taken toll, and the ** Endeavour’s ”’
work is finished.
In years to come that work will be appreciated at its
proper value. No more capable man could have been chosen
to direct it than Harald Christian Dannevig, who combined
a knowledge of the habits and of the life of fish, acquired
from childhood, with the enthusiasm of one who loved his
profession and lived almost solely for it. Out in all weather,
in storm and sunshine, when he could have readily directed
the work from a comfortable office on shore, his one thought
and ambition was to succeed in bringing home to the many
doubting minds in Australia that there is a rich reserve of
food supply in the fisheries of our coast, simply waiting to
be harvested.
From the coast of Queensland to those of Western Australia
a great portion of the sea-bed has been explored, and extensive
areas suitable for trawling and rich in food fishes have been
surveyed and charted. There is no monopoly of the sea-
bed; there are no fences. It waits for enterprise and
industry ; and with care and reasonably good management
must yield profit to the harvester and, what is of greater
Iv.
concern to our people, a certain and abundant cheap supply
of fish food. That was the objective of the *‘ Endeavour’s ”
work during the brief period of her existence—less than six
years—and the foundations have been laid for what in time
will prove to be a flourishing and permanent industry.
Harald Christian Dannevig was born at ‘‘ Flodevig Hiso,”’
an island owned by his father, on one of the fiords of Norway,
near Arendal. His father, Gunnar Mathias Dannevig, was
the first to introduce fish culture into Norway, and the
Norwegian Government established the first fish hatchery
on his island. Harald Dannevig was thirteen years old at
the time, and he thus became familiar with the work from
childhood. He studied at the Christiania University under
the eminent Professor G. O. Sars, and chose those subjects
most likely to be of practical value in the work of fish culture
and acclimatisation. In 1894 he was selected by the Fisheries
Board of Scotland to supervise the completion of the Marine
Hatcheries at Dunbar, and later on he selected the new site
at Aberdeen, designed the new plant, and constructed the
tidal spawning pond. In 1895 he was consulted by the
Lancashire Fisheries Board, and again designed the necessary
plant, and in the same year visited Italy for a similar purpose
at the invitation of the authorities.
Still engaged in the service of the Fisheries Board of
Scotland, he spent a considerable portion of his time at sea
on fishing vessels and trawlers, investigating the various
methods of capture and the habits of fish life. In 1902 the
Agent-General for New South Wales was requested to consult
the best authorities and obtain, as far as possible, the most
competent fisheries expert available. Harald Dannevig was
recommended and appointed.
On his journey to Australia Mr. Dannevig conducted, with
unqualified success, an experiment which until then was
unexampled. He fitted in the between decks of an Orient
mail steamer two tanks in which he succeeded in bringing
to Sydney from England several hundred live adult plaice,
turbot, and other fish. Hesecured sufficient fish food before
leaving, which he kept in the freezing room ofthe ship. Sleeping
alongside the tanks he regulated, as far as practicable, the
temperature, and kept his charges under continual obser-
vation. On arrival in Sydney the fish ponds provided were
found to be ill-constructed and unsuitable; a heat wave
occurred soon afterwards, and it became necessary to release
the fish in the deeper and freer waters of the sea. That
incident was characteristic of the man—patient and thorough,
with only one thought, his work,
V.
He designed and constructed the Fish Hatchery at Gunna-
matta Bay, Port Hacking, New South Wales. In 1906 he
sueceeded in transferring from Hobart to the Hatchery
2.000 adult flounders, from which he hatched and liberated
20,000,000 fry. He conducted a later similar experiment
with greater results.
Amongst the more important original works which, in
addition to his work on the ‘“ Endeavour,” will prove
an enduring record of his valuable services, may be mentioned
investigation in regard to the reproduction of food fishes ;
where fish eggs are deposited; the natural dangers and
troubles of fish life ; periodicity in the abundance of fish
and its causes (a paper on which he read before the Royal
Society) ; fresh water fish culture in New South Wales ;
the habits and migrations of the Mullet ; the life history of
the Cray Fish, together with many Bther interesting a
useful features associated with the history of fish life.
Harald Dannevig was an interesting man personally, as
well as in regard to his particular work. Kind hearted, of
splendid physique, he will be sadly missed by those who
knew him. To the Government he has rendered good
service. There was no necessity for him to visit Macquarie
Island. The vessel was engaged in work apart from her
ordinary responsibilities. He was, however, above all, a
courageous man. Scenting danger, he thought his proper
place was with his crew on board the ship. He went and
died in what he conceived to be the performance of his duty.
He leaves, mourning, a widow, a daughter of sixteen, and
a son of five years of age.
Captain George Pim was in command of the “ Endeavour ”
from 9th October, 1911, and she never had a more capable
master. He had held a command since he was 22 years of
age without an accident of any kind. He had considerable
experience of the Pearl Shell and Beche-de-mer Fisheries in
Torres Straits and Northern Australia, and for some time
had sole charge of a number of vessels engaged in the pearling
industry. He was a member of the Scientific Expedition to
New Guinea in 1905 of Major Cooke Daniels, who wrote :—
““T count myself lucky to have found so good a skipper.
Your loyalty to my interests, which were those of the whole
expedition, and your enthusiasm of helpfulness, earned the
reward of a very great deal of work. ‘Topography, Hydro-
graphy, Technology and general Ethnography, you did them
all more than well. So on the side of actual work you did
not only all you ought to have done as the master of the
“ Kori,” but all you could do as a man of many capabilities
vi.
in many directions.’’ High but deserved praise for a quiet,
modest, capable man; and it is comforting to know, what-
ever happened to the “‘ Endeavour ” two good men were in
charge, and no accident which could possibly have been
avoided by those on board contributed to the disaster. Some
unforeseen disaster overwhelmed the ship and her crew.
Captain Pim has left a widow to mourn her sad loss.
There are sorrowing hearts for others who were on board
the “‘ Endeavour,” and these equally claim our sympathy for
their loss, and a kindly memory for those for whom they
orieve.
The names of those on board were :—
Director of Fisheries... .. Harald Christian Dannevig
Master .. ve — .. George William Charles Pim
Mate - .. wt a .. Joseph Reynoldson Burkitt
Biologist H ie .. Charles Turnbull Harrisson
Second Mate & Chief Fisherman Alfred Ackers
Fisherman ve a .. Herbert A. Farrant
ss aw: Fi .. L. Olsen
My ae oi .. George Cooper
43 sae Harold E. Samson
Chief Hngineer a .. Angus Ross Mackay
Second *) a .. Stanley Ditcham
Third 55 gh .. Richard Charles Hoe
Fireman Pe Bu .. Alfred Holmes
Nils Rasmussen
)
+ att a .. J. Byrne
Ordinary Seaman oe .. Thomas Rice
-; Yi is wat eo W.., Jackson:
Chief Cook and Steward .. A. Wythe
Assistant Cook a .. Harry Kitching
Messroom Boy st .. Thomas Scott
Clerk, Meteorological Bureau Harold Power.
They now rest in the depths of the sea, the mysteries of
which they had been seeking to understand.
May they rest in peace !
N. LOCKYER.
GEORGE WILLIAM CHARLES PIM,
MASTER MARINER.
* And now the storm-blast came, and he
Was tyrannous and. strong :
He struck with his o’er taking wings,
And chased us south along.’ °—Coleridge.
CapTraiIn G. W. C. Prov was born at Gloucester, England, on
9th March, 1866, the son of Mr. John Robert Pim, a gentle-
man of means. He came of a well-known nautical family,
the eldest son in every instance having been in the Royal
Navy, a practice extending backwards for upwards of two
hundred years. The subject of this notice was the first who,
although he had been entered as a Naval cadet. was in conse-
quence of unforeseen causes unable to continue a naval
career.
The family of Pim, or Pym, as originally written, has left
its mark in British history. There is reason to believe that
Captain Pim is a lineally descended kinsman of the celebrated
English parliamentarian, John Pym, who, with John
Hampden, equally eminent in the same direction, was one
of the ‘five members ” impeached by Charles I. in 1642.
The name appears to have originally been Pym, but in the
reign of James I. some of the younger and gayer members,
it is said, became courtiers, but this step not meeting with
the approbation of the older Quakers, the latter expressed
their resentment by changing the family name to Pim.
The name is well known in naval history. From 1798 to
1810 one Lieutenant Samuel Pym (subsequently Captain and
finally Admiral Sir Samuel Pym) did great service in the
Anglo-French naval fights in the West Indies. His most
important commands appear to have been the 74-gun ship
** Atlas,” and the frigate ‘“‘ Sirius.”’ In recent years the best
known naval member of the family was Admiral Bedford
Clapperton Pim (grand-uncle to Captain Pim), who was born
at Bideford in Devonshire in 1826. He took part, amongst
other achievements, in the Franklin Search Expedition to
the Arctic regions under Sir EK. Belcher, in 1852.
After severing his connection with the naval training ship,
George Pim, to use a colloquial phrase, “went to sea ”’ about
1881, serving in various capacities in at least three sea-going
vessels agi 1886, when, being then in Queensland, he ente1 ed
the Lighthouse service and was attached to the Proudtoot
Lightship on the Proudfoot Shoal, Torres Strait. After some
vill.
months of this monotonous life Pim transferred to the
Moreton Bay Pilot service. Henceforth tired of subordinate
positions, he struck out for himself, and either alone or in
partnership occupied himself for some years in “‘ sandalwood
getting’ on the Queensland coast; then migrating to
Thursday Island he entered the ‘‘ beche-de-mer ”’ trade, and
to some slight extent that of ‘pearl shelling’ also. He
successively owned, or part owned (it is uncertain which), and
commanded, when not more than twenty-three years of age,
in 1888 the ‘“ Violet,’ a cutter of nine tons; in 1889, the
* Alice ” and the “ P.C.E.” respectively, a lugger of ten and
a cutter of nineteen tons ; and finally the ‘‘ Whaup,” a ketch
of thirty-four tons. In this last venture Captain Pim was in
partnership with a Mr. Luff, of Thursday Island.
In these several voyages the subject of our notice made
money, which was spent in scientific research in New Guinea
and North Queensland. Towards the end of 1903 Mr. Pim
was in Sydney with the view of obtaining a certificate ; he
passed as “‘only mate” for fore-and-aft vessels on 11th
February, 1904.
Towards the end of 1903 there arrived in Sydney Major
W. Cooke Daniels, of the United States Army, who had been
Adjutant-General of Division in the Cuban campaign, accom-
panied by certain scientific friends. It was his purpose to
rarry out anthropological and ethnological researches in South-
east New Guinea. For this purpose a schooner-yacht of 67
tons, called the “ Kori,” with auxiliary steam power and a
sea-going steam launch was brought from England. Mr. Pim
was appointed master, and the expedition left Sydney in
April, 1904. During the cruise he did excellent work by
surveying and charting Tokunu, or Alcester Island, in the
Trobriand Group, and Gawa Island, in the Marshall Bennett
Group. He also furnished a description of Kwaiawata
Island, in the same group, and this, with the above charts,
appeared in the “* Geographical Journal ” for April, 1906, as
portion of a paper by Drs.C. G. Saligmann and W. M. Strong,
members of the expedition, the former of whom expressed
his thanks to Captain Pim for the latter’s excellent services.
After navigating the “Kori” to Singapore on the
break up of the expedition Mr. Pim, in 1906, became con-
nected for a time with the Celebes Trading Company at the
Aru Islands.
Mr. Pim was appointed master of the ‘* Endeavour ”’ on
the 9th October, 1911, and so remained until disaster brought
about the untimely death of himself and companions, some-
where between Macquarie Island and either New Zealand or
Tasmania.
rb
He is described as an indefatigable worker, a careful navi-
gator, and ever on the watch for trouble when the “Endea-
vour ’ was at work. The nature of her investigations called
for much marine surveying and hydrographic work for the
charting of rocks and other irregularities ; these duties had
often to be carried out by Captain Pim under the most trying
circumstances. The investigation of new areas called for
unremitting care and attention, and he was to be seen in
all parts of the ship watching the trawl-warps and controlling
the soundings, etc., whilst at the same time keeping a sharp
eye on the navigation. When Mr. Dannevig was not on
board the whole responsibility of the trawling operations
and scientific work fell wpon Captain Pim’s shoulders. The
difficulties of working with comparatively so small a vessel
in exposed areas made his task a very difficult one. He was
a keen collector, with a sharp eye for anything unusual, and
many interesting and new organisms in the “ Endeavour’s *
collections were personally secured and preserved by him.
Whilst master of the ‘“‘ Endeavour ” Captain Pim, in 1913,
conveyed Captain Brewis, R.N., who was engaged in re-
porting upon the lighthouses around Australia, from Fre-
mantle to Busselton in Western Australia.
Captain Pim was a man of indomitable resolution, keen
and persevering in his professional duties, quiet and rather
reserved in demeanour, but, beneath all, of a kind and sym-
pathetic nature. His end, and those of his companions, was,
alas, only another exemplification of the fate of many “ that
go down to the sea in ships—that do business in great
waters.”
R. ETHERIDGE.
CHARLES TURNBULL HARRISSON,
BIOLOGIST.
“We bring no store of ingots,
Of spice or precious stones,
But that we have we gathered
With sweat and aching bones.’’—Kipling.
THE zoological knowledge of Charles T. Harrisson was
gathered not in a laboratory nor from lectures, but under
the open sky, from beach, mountain and forest. This type
of pioneer, to whom Biology owes so much, seems more
and more rarely bred under modern conditions. Yet there
is work to be done on the frontiers of science that none
do so well as that self-taught, self-reliant, keen free-lance
the field naturalist.
He belonged to a family long settled in Tasmania, which,
like the Atkinsons and the Hulls, were mostly naturalists,
and to whom such scientific leaders of the last generation as
Tate and Tenison Woods expressed their indebtedness.
Charles was the eldest son of Frank Harrisson, who had
an extensive orchard on the Brown River Road, south of
Hobart, and for some years was a near neighbour of Lieut.
C. EK. Beddome, the well-known Conchologist. The second
son, Ernest Harrisson, was also a keen and successful collector.
The brothers were smart yachtsmen, and explored with
the dredge a wide area of the Derwent Estuary and
D’Entrecasteaux Channel. As far back as 1882, Beddome
dedicated Cemort harrissoni and Alexia harrissoni to
Mr. Charles Harrisson “‘ one of my fellow workers.”
Ornithology was one of the first subjects to interest him,
and he formed a large collection of Tasmanian birds and their
eggs.
On the death of the parents, the home broke up, and
Harrisson tried various occupations without much success.
For a time he had a dairy farm at Long Bay. Then he set
up a studio in Melbourne, but though a clever artist, with
especial ability in landscapes, he failed to obtain sufficient
recognition.
A small post in the Government service at Hobart was
then offered him, in which position he lived pleasantly for
several years, and during the tenure of which he married
and had ason. The local Scientific Society found in him a
zealous and active member. With success he entered on
the study of Tasmanian Crustacea. So that when Sir Douglas
Xl.
Mawson required a good all-round collector for his Antarctic
expedition, the services of Mr. Harrisson were recommended,
and he was enrolled.
The position of Naturalist to the Western Party, under
Mr. F. Wild, was allotted to him. Opportunities for
zoological collecting were scarce, but what could be done was
done. Ever cheerful, ever helpful, he was a comrade whose
energy and good temper were proof against starvation and
such miseries as Antarctic explorers endure. In the ‘““ Home
of the Blizzard,’ Wild writes, “‘ many of the gusts must have
exceeded one hundred miles per hour, since one of them
lifted Harrisson, who was standing beside me, clean over my
head and threw him nearly twenty feet.” A number of
Harrisson’s coloured drawings of Antarctic scenery embellish
Mawson’s book.
A shipmate on the “ Aurora ” (Mr. J. H. Collinson Close)
has supplied the following information :—‘‘ Mr. C. T. Har-
risson was deeply respected and liked by us all. He impressed.
one, on my first acquaintance, as being one whom the Ex-
pedition Leader and we, his comrades, would ill have afforded
to dispense with. Usually preoccupied in thought, and of
earnest, serious manner, his slow, deliberate conversation was
listened to attentively by the most thoughtful among us.
Whether it was heaving on the ‘ Noah’s Ark ’ windlass to
weigh anchor, turning out in the ‘wee sma’ hours of a dirty
morning to haul—in_ bitter icy gale—on frozen topsail-
halliards and weather braces, or taking a trick at the wheel,
manning a boat in a ‘jobbly’ sea or ‘shovelling coal in the
stoke-hole, Harrisson was ever to the fore. Harrisson’s
sledging exploits around the ‘ Second Base ’ of the Expedition
need no comment here, beyond remarking that he did as
much—if not more—sledging than anybody else in the party,
or indeed in the Expedition, with the exception of our
courageous leader, Sir D. Mawson, and his own Base-leader,
Mr. Frank Wild.
“*His artistic work with brush, crayon and pastel excited
universal admiration. The first icebergs we encountered,
steaming south, he transferred to canvas, sketching with
remarkable fidelity and rapidity the various shaded azure
tints of the crevassed ice, and snow mantles of virgin white
enshrouding the bergs. Harrisson was always ready to
impart useful information from knowledge born of his years
of practical training and experience, to any caring to avail
themselves of the opportunity. In view of his many admir-
able talents, and the circumstances that he was, in all things,
a shining example to younger men, his presence on such an
Xl.
expedition was invaluable. The news of his loss with the
ill-fated ‘ Endeavour’ throws an indescribable sadness over
his comrades of other days, and it is safe to say the hearts of
all beat with the deepest sympathy for his dear ones left to
mourn his loss.”
On his return from the Antarctic he was appointed by the
Federal Government Biologist to the Fisheries Bureau. In
this capacity his work was admirable, large collections were
sorted out, and despatched with a skill and neatness much
appreciated by those whose duty it was to deal with them at
a later stage. As an expression of this appreciation a new
shark has been callel by Mr. McCulloch Centrophorus
harrissoni. In the interests of Australian Marine Biology it
was hoped that he would long continue such excellent work.
When he embarked on the last cruise of the “‘ Endeavour ”
he had reached the age of forty-seven.
Mr. W. L. May, a life-long neighbour, writes :—“‘ He was
a man of most courteous and pleasant manner, and his loss
will be deplored by a large circle of friends, of whom I am one.”
C. HEDLEY.
INTRODUCTORY NO BE:
The Reports comprised in the ‘‘Zoological Results of the
Fishing Experiments carried out by the F.I.S. ‘Endeavour’ ”’
have been prepared at the Australian Museum, Sydney, under
the authority of the Trustees, and at the request of the Hon.
The Minister for Trade and Customs.
The material for investigation is sent direct from the
- “‘Endeavour’’ by the Director of Fisheries (Mr. H. C. Dan-
nevig) to the Australian Museum, and, after elaboration, is
b)
distributed as follows :—-All ‘‘types’’ are held in reserve for the
Fisheries Branch of the Department of Trade and Customs ;
a set of ‘‘co-types’’ are retained by the Trustees; the
remainder of the specimens are distributed to the other Aus-
tralasian State Museums in the name of the Minister for
Trade and Customs.
The Reports deal with the Fishes collected on the coasts
of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tas-
mania. The Asteroidea and Sponges are from the same waters
with the addition of those of the Queensland coast. The
Mollusca are a more specialised series, chiefly obtained off
Cape Wiles, South Australia. The new Asymmetron comes
from the Great Australian Bight, and a sample of Globigerina
Ooze was obtained to the east of Tasmania.
my a
a
ik. Sa ; Ot | i bit |
i" li
P be iP i we om Ais aly Mi we el s i as Ais ili "
‘on be , “d Be - a
A 24/3.
I. Report on the Fishes obtained by the F.I.S. ‘* Endeavour,’
on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South
Australia and Tasmania.
BY
ALLAN R. McCULLOCH, Zoo_ocist,
Australian Museum
Sydney.
Plates 1-xvI.; Text figs. 1-20.
. ~~
u :
Ce
’ ‘ d 4
| ype pet al | ‘a. 3a
j
Dit rity ist: / |
{ o
L—REPORI: ON SHE BISHES:
PART Ele
I.—INTRODUCTION.
The collections dealt with in this Report were obtained
by the Federal Fisheries Investigation Ship ‘‘Endeavour,’’
under the direction of Mr. H. C. Dannevig. They were
obtained at many localities along the New South Wales,
Victorian, Tasmanian and South Australian coasts at various
depths down to ninety fathoms. The present part deals with
the greater number of the fishes forwarded for examination to
the Australian Museum from this area, but the Scleroparei
and Jugulares of the Acanthopterygii and the Pediculati and
Plectognathi are reserved for a second part.
In all about 1070 specimens, representing 94 species, have
been critically examined, which, in conjunction with the large
collections in the Australian Museum, have afforded excellent
material for a detailed study of variation in many hitherto little
known species. With a series of forty or fifty specimens from
wide-spread localities before one, it is often a simple matter to
recognise the identity of fishes which have been regarded as
distinct when isolated examples afford no clue. In the follow-
ing pages I have endeavoured to clear up the synonymy of
species of Coelorhynchus, Physiculus, Seriolella, Callanthias,
Ce@sioperca, etc., while figures are given showing the remark-
able variation of Zanclistius, Macrorhamphosus, Centriscops,
Beryx and others. Many of the more striking variations were
specially selected by Mr. Dannevig on board the ship, and it
is largely due to his discrimination in this direction that so
many extreme forms are here dealt with. When individuals
were lacking to complete a series he has gone to considerable
trouble to obtain them, and in the case of fishes in which the
colours were of importance, he has sent me fresh material
packed in ice. For this and other valuable help I owe him
my best thanks.
I have also to acknowledge the kindness of the Com-
mittee of the Macleay Museum who have allowed me to
borrow some of Sir William Macleay’s type specimens for
examination and comparison with the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collec-
tions.
Ten species are described as new, and four others and two
genera are recorded from Australia for the first time. Thirty-
three are figured, and I have to acknowledge the very willing
assistance of Mr. Dene Fry, of the Australian Museum, in
the preparation of the plates.
2 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
IIl.—DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES.
Famiry HEXANCHID.
GenuS HEPTRANCHIAS, Rafinesque.
HEPTRANCHIAS PERLO, Bonnaterre.
Seven-gilled Shark.
(Plate 13pfie. 1-)
Squalus perlo, Bonnaterre, Encycl. Meth., Ichth., 1788, p. ro.
Squalus cinereus, Gmelin, Linn. Syst. Nat., 1789, p. 1497.
Heptanchus cinereus, Muller & Henle, Plagiost., 1839, p. 81,
play.
Notidanus cinereus, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., vii,
1870, p. 398.
The collection includes seven examples which I am unable
to separate from the European H. perlo, Bonnaterre. ‘Their
teeth agree exactly with Muller and Henle’s figure, and they
also fit the description fairly well. I forwarded a photograph
of one of the specimens, together with some notes, to Mr. C.
Tate Regan for his opinion, and he has favoured me with the
following reply :—‘‘So far as I can judge from your photo-
graph the shark is H. cinereus.”
These specimens are readily distinguished from H. indicus,
Agassiz, the only other Australian species, by the following
characters :—
Head broad, snout broadly rounded; a single median tooth
in the upper jaw; colour greyish with darker spots :—indicus.
Head narrow, snout pointed; no single median tooth in the
upper jaw; colour uniform grey :— perlo.
All the specimens were taken in the one haul in 60-70
fathoms, sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria.
Famiry HETERODONTID.
Genus HETERODONTUS, Blainville.
HETERODONTUS PHILIPPI, Bloch and Schneider.
Port Jackson Shark, Bullhead Shark, Oyster Crusher.
Squalus philippi, Bloch and Schneider, Syst. Ichth., 1801,
PP: 737-
Cestracion phillipi, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8)p2 4-5
1908, p. 495-
FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 3
Specimens of this common species were preserved from the
following localities :—
Between Newcastle and Port Stephens, New South Wales,
22-60 tathoms.
Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20
fathoms.
Fifty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia, 75
fathoms.
Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 70 fathoms.
GENUS GYROPLEURODUS, Gill.
GYROPLEURODUS GALEATUS, Giinther.
Crested Port Jackson Shark.
Cestracion galeatus, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii.,
1870, p. 416.
Gyropleurodus galeatus, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 1.,
1908, p. 495.
Two specimens from 43 fathoms, six miles off Port
Stephens, New South Wales.
Famiry SCYLIORHINID/-.
GENUS SCYLIORHINUS, Blainville.
SCYLIORHINUS ANALIS, Ogilby.
Spotted Dog-fiskh, Spotted Cat-shark.
Scyllium anale, Ogilby, Proc. Linn: Soc. N.S. Wales, x.,
1885, Pp. 445.
Scyliorhinus analis, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 1.,
1908, pp. 455 and 460.
Scyllium maculatum, Ramsay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
v., 1880, p. 97; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882
. (1883), p. 138 (nec. S. maculatum, Bl. Schn.).
The collection includes two males, one from Shoalhaven
Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and the other from
off Babel Island, Bass Strait. Ogilby! has suggested that the
specimen doubtfully recorded from Tasmania by R. M. John-
ston as Scyllium maculatum is really this species, and this
view is confirmed by the second ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen.
The size of the anal tin is variable in different specimens of
this species and therefore cannot be relied upon as has been
done by Regan in his key to the species of Scyliorhinus.
1 Ogilby—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), iv., 1889, p. 180.
4 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
SCYLIORHINUS VINCENTI, Zietsz.
(Plate 11., fig. 3, and fig. 1.)
Scyllium vincenti, Zietz, Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia,
XXxXI., 1908, p. 287.
Through the kindness of Professor E. C. Stirling, Director
of the South Australian Museum, I have been able to compare
one of Mr. Zietz’s specimens with another taken by the ‘‘En-
deavour’’ in 20 tathoms off the mouth of the Murray River,
South Australia. They differ slightly in the relative positions
of the fins which, however, I find to be equally variable in
allied species.
According to Zietz, the origin of the first dorsal is behind
the middle of the total length. In both I have examined it
is a little nearer the tip of the snout than the extremity of the
tail. In the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen the base of the anal is
shorter than that of the co-type and terminates below the
anterior portion of the second dorsal instead of nearer the
middle of that fin. ~The end of the bases of the ventrals is in
advance of the origin of the dorsal, not below it, as described
by Zietz, though in his specimen the flesh is shrunken around
the base of the dorsal, making it appear farther forward than
it really is. Finally, the colour in the better preserved
example is a dark chocolate brown above, with numerous
creamy-white spots all over the body and fins, except on the
front half of the head. The dark cross-bands are ill-defined,
and there appears to be a series of darker blotches on the
sides. The belly is creamy-white in colour.
The following is a description of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ speci-
men :—Head to last gill-opening 5.3 in the length, its width
1.5 in its length; eye 6.5 in the head and about equal to half
the length of the snout which is 3.1 in the head. The inter-
orbital space is greater than the length of the snout. Preoral
portion of the head 1.5 in the width of the mouth which is
2.4 in the head and greater than the snout.
Body elongate, slightly compressed. Head depressed, flat
above; snout rounded, blunt in profile, its width before the
eyes one-third greater than its length. Eyes lateral, with
the inferior fold well marked. Spiracle large, oval, and
placed just behind the eye. Gill-slits decreasing in size back-
wards, the last being about half as wide as the first and placed
over the base of the pectoral. Nasal valves produced as lobes
directed outwards and backwards, with emarginate posterior
borders; they are separated from each other and from the
mouth, the space between them being rather more than the
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 5
width of one lobe. No cirrus. A well-marked labial fold
extends round the angle of the mouth, its anterior limb rather
shorter than its posterior which extends less than half way
towards the middle of the lower jaw. ‘Teeth similar in both
jaws, arranged in several rows, tricuspid, with the median
point longer than thg lateral ones.
FIG, 1.
First dorsal originating a little behind the posterior base of
the ventrals and slightly in advance of the middle of the total
length. The length of its base is much greater than its
height ; its anterior margin is very oblique, and the posterior
nearly vertical, and the lower angle is pointed. The second
dorsal is a trifle higher than the first, and is of similar form,
though the posterior angle 1s slightly produced; its origin is
over the posterior portion of the anal, and the hinder angle
is midway between the posterior insertion of the first dorsal
and the tip of the caudal. The anal is considerably larger
than either of the dorsals, and its base is longer than its dis-
tance from the caudal; the posterior angle acute. Greatest
breadth of the caudal a little less than one-third of its length.
Posterior angles of the ventrals acute and the margins united
in the male.
Scales quadrilateral and keeled on the head, becoming tri-
angular and acutely pointed dorsally and tricuspid on the
sides.
Colour.—Chocolate brown above, with ill-defined darker
cross-bars. ‘There are indications of some dark blotches on
the sides, and the hinder half of the head, body, tail and fins
bear many creamy-white spots which tend to form rings.
Total length of adult male 414 mm.
6 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
The tollowing key will serve to distinguish the four species
of Scyliorhinus hitherto recorded from Australia :—
a. Nasal valves separated from each other and from the
mouth.
b. Labial fold extending along the lower jaw half or less
than half the distance to the symphysis.
c. Body lighter with brown spots and sometimes cross-
bands. Ventral fins of males not directly in con-
tact behind the claspers but with an intermediate
integument :— analis.
cc. Body darker, with white spots and obscure cross-
bands. Ventral fins of males in contact behind the
* claspers :-—— vincentt.
bb. Labial fold extending along the lower jaw nearly to the
symphysis.
d. Body with scattered darker spots:— maculatum.
aa. Nasal valves overlapping the edge of the upper lip.
e. Body with darker spots, sometimes confluent
into cross bands or ocelli :— marmoratus-
GENUS CEPHALOSCYLLIUM, Gill.
CEPHALOSCYLLIUM ISABELLA, Bonnaterre.
Swell Shark, Carpet Shark.
L’ Isabelle, Broussonet, Mem. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1780, p. 648
(non binomial).
Squalus isabella, Bonnaterre, Encycl. Meth., Ichth., 1788,
p: 6:
Squalus (i)sabella, Gmelin, Linn. Syst. Nat., 1789, p. 1489,
Scyllium laticeps, Dumeril, Rev. et Mag. Zool., 1853, p. 84,
Pl. Ciil:.,. HB). 2%
Cephaloscyllium laticeps, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., 1., No-
2, 1900,)p:! 6., ipl. xiv., fig igmand pl sexi.d thie: aie
Cephaloscyllium sabella, Waite, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., xli.,
1910, p. 384.
A small example is in the collection which was trawled off
the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 7
Famity ORECTOLOBIDZ:.
GENUS PARASCYLLIUM, Gill.
PARASCYLLIUM VARIOLATUM, Dumeril.
(Plate ii., fig. 1.)
Hemiscylliium variolatum, Dumeril, Rev. et. Mag. Zool.,
1853, Pol2h, plo tiene. 12
Parascyllium variolatum, Ogilby and McCulloch, Proc. Roy.
Soc. N.S.Wales, xlii., 1908, p.260.
Two fine female examples were taken off Port Phillip Heads
in November, 1909.
PARASCYLLIUM COLLARE, Kamsay and Odgtlby.
Collared Cat Shark.
Parascylium collare, Ramsay and Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soe.
Nes Wales (2), -1., 1886s. p= 1310; 1d., “Ogilby and
McCulloch, Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S. Wales, xlii., 1908,
p. 267.
Three males from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales,
15-45 fathoms.
PARASCYLLIUM FERRUGINEUM, Sp. nov.
(Plate 11., fig. 2, and fig. 2.)
Head to last gill-opening, 5.8 in the length, its width 1% in
its length. Eye g in the head, 2.8 in the snout which is 3.2
in the head. Interorbital space almost equal to the snout.
Preoral portion of head equal to half the width of the mouth
which is 1.3 in the snout.
Body elongate, somewhat depressed anteriorly, cylindrical
posteriorly. Head much depressed with its upper surface
flat; snout broadly rounded, obtusely conical in profile and
increasing in width backwards. Eyes lateral with a prominent
fold below. Spiracle minute and situated half an eye-diameter
from the infero-posterior angle of the eye. Gill-openings in-
creasing regularly in size from the first to the fourth, the
last very large, 3% the width of the first and more than half
as long as the snout; the last two are placed over the base of
the pectoral. Nasal cirrus short and thick, just reaching to
the lips; exterior nasal fold with two or three small lobes
posteriorly, the outer the longest and pointed. Lower labial
fold extending about half way towards the middle of the jaw
and continued round the angle of the mouth. Teeth similar in
8 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
both jaws, small, flattened, triangular and acute, with rounded
projections on each side basally but not tricuspid.
First dorsal fin originating well behind the ventrals, but a
little nearer the tip of the snout than the end of the tail; its
posterior margin nearly vertical and forming a right angle
with the lower margin. Second dorsal subequal to the first
and of similar form, its hinder angle about midway between
the posterior insertion of the first and the tip of the caudal.
Anal fin low with its outer border oblique and terminating
below the anterior part of the second dorsal; the length of its
base about 14 in its distance from the caudal. Greatest
breadth of the caudal a little less than one-fourth its length.
Pectorals longer than broad, with the angles rounded. Ven-
trals quadrilateral, 1% as long as broad.
Colour.—Greyish brown above with indistinct darker cross-
bands; the first narrow and extending between the eyes, the
next broader and covering the space between the gill-openings.
There are two more before the first dorsal and one in front of
the second dorsal. Entire body with evenly spaced large
brown spots which are darkest on the cross-bars and become
elongate on the caudal. Three similar spots on each side of
the nuchal band. Fins also with spots which are most
numerous on the dorsal.
Type.—A female, 730 mm. long, taken outside Port Phillip
Heads, Victoria, in November, 1909.
Of the two described species of Parascyllium this is
nearest allied to P. collare, Rams. and Ogil., but it may be at
once distinguished by its much broader head, more rounded
snout, larger fins and different colouration.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 9
Famity CARCHARIID.
GENus GALEUS, Rafinesque.
GALEUS AUSTRALIS, Macleay.
School Shark.
Galeus australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi.,
1881, p. 354.
Six small examples, each about 110 mm. long, were
obtained in Oyster Bay, Tasmania.
GENUS) PRIONACE, Cantor.
PRIONACE GLAUCA, Linneus.
Blue Shark.
y
|
Squalus glaucus, Linneus, Syst. Nat., roth ed., 1758, p. 235.
A number of specimens of this widely distributed species
were caught with hand-lines off the South Australian coast.
Famiry SPHYRNIDAE.
GENUS SPHYRNA, Rafinesque.
SPHYRNA LEWINI, Lord.
Hammer-headed Shark.
Zygena lewini, Lord in Griffith, Anim. Kingd., x., 1834,
p- 640.
One small male from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass
Strait.
Famity SQUALID.
GENUS SQUALUS, Linn@us.
SQUALUS MEGALOPS, Macleay.
Dog-fish.
Acanthias megalops, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
Vie LOOT, 0. 307.
Numerous examples of this species were preserved from off
Babel and Flinders Islands, Bass Strait.
Famiry PRISTIOPHORID-.
GENUS PRISTIOPHORUS, Miiller and Henle.
PRISTIOPHORUS CIRRATUS, Latham.
Saw Shark.
Pristis cirratus, Latham, Trans. Linn. Soc., i1., 1794, p. 281,
pl. xxvi., fig. 5, and pl. xxvii.
Numerous foetal specimens and several young of this species
are in the collection from Shoalhaven Bight, New South
Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and north of Goose Island, Bass
Strait.
Io “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PRISTIOPHORUS NUDIPINNIS, Giinther.
Saw Shark.
(Plate 1., fig. 2.)
Pristiophorus nudipinnis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish.,
vili., 1870, p. 432; 1d., McCoy, Prodr. Zool: Vict.; 1881,
pl. Ivi., fig. 2; id., Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), i1.,
1908, p. 57. :
The collection includes several foetal and young specimens
from off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20
fathoms, and from Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South
Australia, 37 fathoms.
Plate 1., fig. 2, represents a young example, 445 mm. long,
from the latter locality.
Famity SQUATINID.
GENUS SQUATINA, Dumeril.
SQUATINA SQUATINA, Linneus.
Angel Shark.
Squalus squatina, Linnzeus, Syst. Nat., 10 ed., 1758, p. 233-
Rhina squatina, McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., Dec. iv., 1879,
pl. xacxiv.
Young and foetal examples were preserved from the follow-
ing localities :—
Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
North-west of Greenly Island, South Australia, 44 fathoms.
Forty-two miles south of St. Francis Island, South Aus-
tralia, 35 fathoms.
Famity RAJID AE.
GeENus Raja, Linne@us.
RAJA AUSTRALIS, Macleay.
Skate.
Raia australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, viii.,
1884, p. 461.
Raja australis, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 40,
pl. iv.
Two large males were preserved from the Shoalhaven
Bight, N.S. Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
Raja nitipa, Giinther.
(Fig. 3-)
Raja nitida, Gunther, ‘‘Challenger’’ Rept., Zool. i., 1880,
Po 27 Pi ive fie: a.
This species has hitherto been known only from a small
male, five inches wide, from off Twofold Bay, New South
Wales, 120 fathoms. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection includes
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 11
three females and one male from seven and a half to eight
inches wide, which present considerable differences from
Ginther’s figure, but, in view of their larger size and the fact
that they come from deep water, 90 fathoms, only one to two
hundred miles from Twofold Bay, I have no hesitation in
identifying them with this species.
The most striking difference lies in the teeth which are
described as ‘‘with very small points, almost obtuse.’’ This
description fits those of my female specimens which are
almost pavement-like with blunt points, but in the male they
are long and acute. The development of spines on the head
and body, pectorals and tail, is much greater in the larger
specimens, though less in the female than the male. None of
my specimens have quite the same outward form as the young
one figured, but this is variable in the different speci-
mens and does not afford a specific character. Finally, the
dark blotches shown in the figure are wanting in my four,
though the clusters of white spots are similarly distributed.
The following description is drawn up from the four **En-
deavour’’ specimens :—
Snout to anterior nostrils 3.3 in the head to the last gill-slit.
Interorbital space less than two-thirds of the eye, which is 4.7
in the head. Width of the mouth about 3.5 in the head.
Disk very broad, its width greater than the length from the
tip of the snout to its hinder margin; its anterior margin more
or less undulated, the border of the pectoral either forming an
unbroken line or distinct angle with the sides of the head ;
hinder margin rounded and somewhat angular posteriorly-
Snout with a small median papilla. The distance between the
outer borders of the eyes is greater than that between the
latter and the edge of the disk. Preoral length of the head
equal to the width between the outer edges of the spiracles.
Nasal lobes produced backwards and outwards, the space
between them less than half the preoral length. Inner margin
of the nostrils with two interior and one exterior lobe when
folded, all of which form a broad-mouthed tube when ex-
panded. Gill-slits decreasing in size backwards, much smaller
than the spiracle which is-about half the length of the eye.
Teeth small, with expanded though not confluent bases in the
male, and long median points directed backwards. In the
female they are rounded, flattened and juxtaposed, the median
point being reduced to a small prominence only.
Entire upper surface covered with minute prickles directed
backwards. ‘There are two large curved spines before each
eye and three or four behind them. One to three are present
on the mid-line behind the head, which may be surrounded by
12 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
several smaller ones also. Behind these are several irregular
rows of thorns which range themselves in one median row and
two lateral ones on the tail and extend to the first dorsal fin.
—_—
ae Ne
SS
ne ——
a ~~
FIG. 3.
Sides of the pectoral without larger thorns in the female, but
these are well developed in the male, the innermost ones being
the largest. Entire lower surface perfectly smooth.
Dorsal fins subequal, the space between them half or less
than half the length of their bases. In some the interval
between the second dorsal and the caudal is equal to that
between the two dorsals, in others the two fins are almost
united. A skinny flap, which is widest posteriorly, extends
varying distances along the sides of the tail, sometimes reach-
ing as far as the ventrals.
Colour.—Light brown above with very indistinct darker
marblings. Clusters of white spots are scattered over the
body, the most prominent of which is on the mid-line behind
the head, two pairs on each side of it, and one near the middle
of each pectoral fin.
Total length 350 mm.
Trawled in go fathoms, east Si East Sister Island, Bass
Strait, and elsewhere off the Victorian Coast.
RAJA WAITH, sp. nov.
(Plate iii., and fig. 4.)
Space between the nostrils equal to their distance from the
tip of the snout. Greatest width of the mouth 2.5 in the head
to the last gill-slit. Interorbital width 5 in the same, and a
little greater than the length of the eye.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. rege
Disk broad and rounded, ‘its length 1.1 In its breadth.
Snout broadly rounded, with a median rounded papilla, and
confluent with the anterior margins of the pectorals which are
almost straight. The lateral margins of the pectorals are
rounded, as is the angle between them and the posterior
border. The distance between the outer margins of the eyes
is greater than that of the latter from the edge of the disk.
Preoral length much less than the distance between the outer
margins of the spiracles and 2.7 in the head to the last gill-
opening. Width of the spiracles one-third the preoral length.
>—
FIG. 4,
Nasal lobes produced backwards and outwards, the exterior
margins truncate, the posterior sinuate; the distance between
them near the mouth about two-thirds of that between the
nostrils. Nostrils with a raised tubular margin which forms a
lobe posteriorly. Gill-slits decreasing in size backwards, the
14 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
first rather more than half the width of the spiracle. Teeth
small and rounded, scarcely juxtaposed, each with a small
median point.
Upper surface of disk quite smooth except for two pairs of
spines above the anterior part of the eyes and four over the
posterior portions. Several minute spines are also present on
the upper eye-lid. ‘Tail with several rows of spines which are
largest anteriorly but most numerous posteriorly. Both dorsal
fins are also covered with minute spines.
Dorsal fins subequal, the space between them equal to half
the length of their bases. Caudal absent. A broad skinny
flap extends along each side of the tail as far as the end of
the ventrals. Anterior lobes of the ventrals greatly produced,
the gaps between them and the posterior lobes each with four
small triangular lobes. On the upper surface, where the fins
are covered by the disk, there is a pair of large fatty glands.
Colour.—Pale brown above with lighter patches which are
covered with small brown dots. Body, fins and tail with
numerous small bluish spots which are absent only on the
lighter patches on the disk; in places they are confluent and
form reticulate patterns. Lower surfaces slate-coloured.
Length of specimen 454 mm.
A single female specimen was trawled in 44 fathoms, north-
west of Greenly Island, South Australia.
This species is at once distinguished from all other Aus-
tralian species of Raja by its rounded and perfectly smooth
body. Famity NARCOBATIDA.
GENUS NARCINE, Henle.
NARCINE TASMANIENSIS, Richardson.
Tasmanian Numb-fish.
Narcine tasmaniensts, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1841,
p:-22, and Trans. Zool. gSoe.,, 1i.,-0849, «ps 176, pl xt.,
heats
ae ent were preserved from the east coast of Flinders
Island, Bass Strait.
amity DASYBATID/E.
Genus UroLopnuus, Miiller and Henle.
UROLOPHUS CRUCIATUS, Lacépede.
Banded Stingaree.
Raja cruciatus, Lacépéde, Ann. Mus., iv., 1804, pp. 201 and
210, lesan oo.) 2.
Urolophus cruciatus, Richardson, Zool. Erebus and Terror,
Fishes, 1844, p. 35, pl. xxiv.
Two specimens from 4o fathoms off the east coast of
Flinders Island, Bass Strait.
FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 15
Famity AETOBATID.
Genus AEtTOBATUS, Blainville.
AETOBATUS AUSTRALIS, Macleay.
Eagle Ray.
Myliobatis aquila, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870,
p- 489; id., Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1., 1872,
p. 225 (nec Raja aquila, Linn.).
Myliobatis nieuhofii, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1.,
1872, p. 226, and ii., 1873, p. 58 (nec Raja nieuhofi, Bl.
Schn. ).
Myliobatis australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
vi., 1881, p. 380; id., McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., pl. Ixiil.,
1882.
A young specimen is preserved from the Shoalhaven Bight,
New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
Gunther identified some very young Myliobatis from Sydney
with M. aquila, Linneus, though he noted certain characters
in their teeth which did not agree with those of that species.
Castelnau (1873) suggested that this identification was in-
correct and considered that they were probably the young of
M. nieuhofi, Bl. Schn. Waite regarded them as M. australis,
Macleay, as is evident from the fact that he omitted aquila
from his list of the fishes of New South Wales.! In another
paper? he expressed the opinion that WM. nieuhofi and M. aus-
tvalis were identical, but it would seem that they differ in
the forms of their snouts, it being somewhat produced in the
former, and blunt and short in the latter.
McCoy showed that M. australis occurred in Port Phillip,
and under the circumstances I have little doubt that Castel-
nau’s specimens were really that species and not M. nieuhofi.
I therefore arrange the synonymy as above.
Famity CHIMAERIDE.
GENUS CHIM&RA, Linn@us.
CHIMERA OGILBYI, Waite.
Ghost Shark.
Chimera ogilbyi, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., pt. 1., 1899,
p. 48, pl. vi. ; id., Shigeho Tanaka, Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp.
Wniv. Vokio, xxau., Art: 7, pote:
1 Waite—Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club., ii., i904.
2Waite-—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 47.
16 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Two males are in the collection which were trawled in 40
fathoms off the East Coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait.
Waite’s specimens were all females, but the males have been
well described by Shigeho Tanaka from Japan.
Famity CALLORHYNCHID-.
GENUS CALLORHYNCHUS, Cuvier.
CALLORHYNCHUS CALLORYNCHUS, Linn@us.
Elephant-fish.
Callorhynchus callorynchus, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i.,
Nor 2)-1900,, p. 23, pl. sau, figs 2.
A small specimen is preserved taken off the east coast of
Flinders Island, Bass Strait, and six others from the Victorian
coast: Famity CLUPEID.
GENUS CLUPEA, Linneus.
CLUPEA (POMOLOBUS) BASSENSIS, sp. nov.
Australian Sprat.
(Plate iv., fig. 2.)
Clupea sprattus, Gunther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 672 (nec
’. sprattus, Linnzeus).
DP 185, Av 18-207 0P. 17>) Vanes © 1914 Scales) a4eore:
Body elongate, its greatest breadth less than half its height,
which is 4.4 to 4.8 in the length from the snout to the hypural.
Belly somewhat rounded, the scutes small, twenty-one between
the head and the ventrals, and eleven more to the vent.
Scales large, cycloid, commencing above the preopercle and
extending onto the base of the tail.
Head 3.5 to 4 in the length, and either very little or con-
siderably longer than the body is deep. Eye 3.1 to 3.6 in the
head, with a narrow adipose lid before and behind. Inter-
orbital space flat, equal to about two-thirds of the eye.
Maxillary very large, its greatest width one-third its length,
reaching to below the anterior third or almost to the middle of
the eye; supplemental bone very large. Upper posterior
border of the operculum emarginate; hindermost portion
formed of a skinny flap. Cheeks and upper portion of oper-
culum covered with translucent flesh, the rest of the head
naked. Lower margin ,of the maxillary microscopically
denticulate. A few microscopic teeth are placed at widely-
spaced intervals on the anterior part of the jaws.!
Origin of the dorsal well in advance of the middle of the
total length and just behind the vertical of the ventral fins ;
1 Gunther stated that he found palatine teeth in his specimens “as well
developed as in Cl. sprattus.’’ I have failed to find any in either species,
but this character is generally admitted to be inconstant.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 7
the length of its base is just about equal to the distance from
the tip of the snout to the hinder margin of the eye and longer
than the anterior rays. Anal low, its length much greater than
that of the dorsal. Ventrals as long as half their distance
from the vent.
Colour.—Silvery, the upper third of the body dark blue.
Scattered darker specks are found on the jaws and preorbitals
and on the caudal peduncle. Rays of the dorsal, caudal and
pectoral fins also dark spotted.
Length of largest specimen 117 mm. Described from two
specimens from off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass
Strait. Others are from the entrance to Storm Bay, Tas-
mania.
It is only after a detailed comparison of these specimens
with many others of C. sprattus from the London markets that
I venture to regard them as distinct. They appear to differ by
their more elongate form, my deepest specimen, the one
figured, having the depth of the body less than the length of
the head, whereas in C. sprattus it is considerably deeper.
That species further seems invariably to have but seven rays
in the ventral fin without counting the imperfect short one in
front. All of C. bassensis have eight. C. antipodum, Hector,
is a very distinct species with a much shorter body, well
developed abdominal scutes, and with the ventral placed
below instead of just in advance of the anterior portion of the
dorsal. From C. sajax, Jenyns, the new species is at once
distinguished by the position of its ventral fin.
In 1867 a note from Mr. J. E. Calder was published! in
which he recorded an immense shoal of these Herrings being
driven ashore in Simmons’ Cove, Bruni Island, Tasmania, by
Barracouta, Kingfish and others. He considered there
were about one hundred tons of them on the shore and fully
two hundred more at the bottom of the water, all dead. Carts
and boats were used to take them away for manure, yet they
were scarcely lessened in quantity. Mr. Allport also noted
that a similar shoal had been observed in 1844, and numbers of
the fish had passed far up into the Derwent River.
CLUPEA (CLUPANODON) NEOPILCHARDUS, Steindachner.
Pilchard.
Clupanodon neopilchardus, Steindachner, Denk. K. Akad.
Wass. Wien xii: 1970; p. iz:
Three specimens from 26-30 fathoms, eight miles off
Wooded Bluff, Clarence River, New South Wales, are of
1 Calder—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1867, p. 5.
18 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
interest as showing how far north this species extends on our
coast. It extends around southern Australia and up to Hout-
man’s Abrolhos on the west coast, and is also known from
Vasmania and New Zealand.
Famity ARGENTINIDZ.
GENUS ARGENTINA, Linn@us.
ARGENTINA ELONGATA, Hutton.
Argentina elongata, Hutton, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), iii.,
LO7Owpeiseu td-, VWaitemwec, Cantb.sMins:5 45, moninep:
TOL ple xiv.
Thirteen examples of this species, 65-125 mm. long, differ
from a larger one from New Zealand only in the colour-mark-
ings. All have a dark band above the silvery lateral line on
which are arranged six to nine blackish spots. Near the tail
there is a second series on the lateral line and more or less
alternate to those above them. There is also a dark mark
on the side of the snout. Though they can be traced, these
markings are very indistinct in the larger specimen.
They were taken at the following localities :—
Entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 30
fathoms.
Fifteen miles off Norah Head, New South Wales, 45-58
fathoms.
No species of this genus has been previously recorded from
Australian waters.
Famity SYMBRANCHID&.
GENUS CHEILOBRANCHUS, Richardson.
CHEILOBRANCHUS RUFUS, Macleay.
Red-banded Shore Eel.
Chilobranchus rufus, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
Wiss OOL spy 200,
Cheilobranchus rufus, Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., Vi1., 1906,
Dros asplimexxivicy fies om
Numerous specimens were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tas-
mania.
Famity LEPTOCEPHALID@.
GENUS CONGERMUR-ENA, Kaup.
CONGERMUR-ENA HABENATA, Richardson.
Little Conger Eel.
Congrus habenatus, Richardson, Zool. Ereb. & Terr., Fishes,
[846; P- "209, plod, Gea ey.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 19
Congromurena longicauda, Ramsay & Ogilby, Proc. Linn.
Soc. N.S. Wales (2), ii., 1888) p. 1o22.
A single specimen from Port Arthur, Tasmania, belongs to
the long-tailed form of this species. Comparison with five
other Australian specimens and one from New Zealand shows
that the lengths of the body and tail are variable and have no
specific value. As this is the only character which can be
relied upon to distinguish C. longicauda from C. habenata, the
former name can no longer stand.
Famity MYRID.
GENUS MuR-ENICHTHYS, Bleeker.
MuUR-ENICHTHYS TASMANIENSIS, sp. nov.
(Fig. 5.)
Body worm-like, the depth 3.3 in the head. Head 12.8 in
the total length, and 4.3 in the space between the gill opening
and the vent. Eve 3.2 in the snout, which is long and obtusely
pointed, and 4.8 in the head. Cleft of mouth extending far
behind the eye, and 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below
the end of the mouth. Tube of anterior nostril with a minute
exterior lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril overhanging
the lip and placed below the anterior portion of the eye.
Teeth in single rows on the jaws and palate; three or four
larger ones on either side of the vomer. Rows of widely-
spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper surface of
the snout and behind the eyes. Gill-opening narrow, about as
wide as the eye. The lateral line appears to be almost straight
anteriorly, but the sides of the head between the gill-opening
and the preoperculum are considerably damaged and render
this character uncertain. Vent well in advance of the middle
of the length, its distance from the tip of the snout 1.4 in the
tail. Dorsal and anal fins very low, almost rudimentary.
Origin of the dorsal a trifle nearer the tip of the snout than
the tail, its distance from the vent equal to the length of the
head.
+SEE = reer 5
fe a Nn rar er ae Si a a A ne OSes
3) - ae oS y] SS
< Se
FIG. 5.
Colour.—Pale green in formalin, the upper portion
speckled with minute brown dots which are of uniform size.
Anteriorly they are confined to the upper half of the body,
but posteriorly they approach the lower surface. On the
head they extend onto the sides and the lower jaw.
Length 170 mm. One specimen from the entrance to Oyster
‘Bay, Tasmania.
36 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
This species differs from the specimen I have identified as
M. breviceps, Gunther, in the position of the origin of the
dorsal which is behind instead of far in advance of the vent.
It has also a much longer and sharper snout, smaller eye, and
more rudimentary fins; the colour-marking is different, the
spots on the back being similar to those on the sides, and
they extend onto the sides of the head and the lower jaw.
It is very closely allied to, and possibly identical with M.
australis, Macleay, but differs from the five specimens I have
examined of that species in having the origin of the dorsal far
instead of only slightly behind that of the anal. The snout is
also somewhat longer, being 4.8 in the head instead of 5.3.
MuR2&NICHTHYS AUSTRALIS, Macleay.
(Fig. 6.)
?Murenichthys gymnotus ?, Gunther, Chall. Rept., Zool., 1.,
1880, p. 30 (nec Bleeker).
Murenichthys australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
Wales, vi., 1881, p. 272.
Body terete and vermiform, its depth behind the gill open-
ing 3.3, behind the vent 3.9 in the head. Head 13 in the total
length, and 4.5 in the trunk. Eye very small, nearly 3 in the
snout, which is obtusely pointed and 5.3 in the head. Cleft of
mouth extending far behind the eye, its length from the tip
of the snout 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end
of the mouth. Tube of anterior nostril with a minute exterior
lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril overhanging the lip
and placed below the anterior margin of the eye. Teeth in
single rows on the jaws and palate; three or four larger ones
on either side of the vomer. Rows of widely-spaced pores
extend along each jaw, on the upper surface of the snout,
behind the eye and up towards the origin of the lateral line.
Gill opening as wide as the eye. Lateral line a little arched
over the branchial sac. Vent wel! in advance of the middle of
the length, its distance from the end of the snout 1.35 in the
tail. Dorsal and anal fins very low except near the end of the
tail where they are a little broadened out and extend around
the point. The origin of the dorsal is a little behind that of the
anal, not over the vent as stated by Macleay.
——— ]
FIG. 6.
Colour.—After long preservation, uniform brown, with
minute darker specks above the lateral line and on the head
where they extend onto the sides and lower jaw.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 21
Described from the type, 248 mm. long, from Lane Cove,
Port Jackson. Two other specimens are in the Macleay
Museum without data, and two in the Australian Museum
from Port Jackson.
I am indebted to Professors W. A. Haswell and T. W. E.
David for the opportunity of redescribing and figuring
Macleay’s original specimen.
It is very probable that the specimen from Port Jackson
which Gunther doubtfully identified as M. gymnotus, Bleeker,
is not that species but is M. australis. The two may be easily
distinguished, the latter having but a single row of maxillary
teeth instead of several, and its mouth extending not slightly
but far behind the eye.
Ogilby has proposed the genus Scolecenchelys! for this
species, and in a letter he informs me that it ‘‘differs from
Murenichthys in the much more slender and elongate body
and the origin and dev elopment of the dorsal fin (as comparing
australis with breviceps).’’ I regard these as specific rather
than generic characters.
MUR4ENICHTHYS BREVICEPS, Giinther.
(Fig. 7-)
?Murenichthys macropterus, lunzinger, Arch. Nat.,
XXXViil., i., 1872, p. 43 (nec Bleeker).
Murenchthys breviceps, Giinther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4),
XVile 1970, AO
A nam specimen, 195 mm. long, from South Auceraka, is
possibly the young of this species. As will be seen by the
figure, its proportions do not quite agree with those of the
type, which is twenty inches long, but the differences may
perhaps be accounted for by its small size. The following is
a description of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen :—
Body worm-like, the depth 4 in the head. Head 10.8 in the
total length and 2.7 in the trunk. Eye 2.6 in the snout, which
is 44 in the head. Cleft of the mouth extending far behind the
eye and 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of
the mouth. ‘Tube of the anterior nostril very large, with a
minute external lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril over-
hanging the lip and placed just before the eye. Rows of large
widely-spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper sur-
face of the head and behind the eye. Lateral line arched above
the branchial sac. Dorsal and anal fins very low, extending
1 Ogilby—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxii., i897, p. 240.
22 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
around the end of the tail. Origin of the dorsal a trifle nearer
the tip of the snout than the vent, its distance from the gill
opening 2.3 in that from the vent.
—= oe
FIG. 7.
Colour.—Pale green in formalin, speckled with minute
brown dots which are very small and crowded on the upper
surface, and larger near the lateral line; anteriorly they
scarcely extend below the middle of the body, but posteriorly
they approach the ventral surface. Extreme end of the dorsal
and caudal darker, the fins otherwise colourless.
Trawled in 35 fathoms, south of St. Francis Island, South
Australia.
The specimens identified as Murenichthys macropterus,
Bleeker, from Port Phillip and the Murray River, are probably
not that species, but are M. breviceps, which is said by its
author to differ from the former by its comparatively shorter
head and longer snout.
Famity AULOPID/E.
GENUS AULOPUS, Cuvier.
AULOPUS PURPURISSATUS, Richardson.
Sergeant Baker.
Aulopus purpurissatus, Richardson, Icones Piscium, 1843, p-
Wie ipl iis ihe. 3.
Already known from western and eastern Australia, this
species is now recorded from South Australia, a specimen
having been trawled in 75 fathoms, fifty miles south of Cape
Wiles.
Famity SUDID/Z.
GENUS CHLOROPHTHALMUS, Bonaparte.
CHLOROPHTHALMUS NIGRIPINNIS, Giinther.
Cucumber Fish.
Chlorophthalmus nigripinnis, Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.
(5) il 1878, p. 182, ande@nall. Rept.) Zool) scxiit, ap:
193, opls lt whic. “a; id. VWeate,, Proc. "NoZ. inst. woTo;
p. 25) and Rec. Cantb. Mais 1.) 1911, p: 164, "plo xxv.
This species exhibits considerable variation in its markings
according to age, young specimens of about five inches long
having the sides blotched and spotted with bluish-grey,
whereas others of eleven inches are immaculate. The mark-
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 2
H
ings on the fins also differ in intensity in a large series of
specimens.
C. nigripinnis was, until recently, known only from the
deeper waters of New South Wales. Waite has recorded it
from New Zealand, however, and it must now be added to
the Victorian and Tasmanian lists, about one hundred and
fifty specimens having been preserved from the following
localities :—
Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40
fathoms.
Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales,
22-60 fathoms.
Famity MACRORHAMPHOSIDE.
Genus MACRORHAMPHOSUS, Lacépede.
MACRORHAMPHOSUS ELEVATUS, Waite.
Bellows Fish.
(Figgs83)
Macrorhamphosus scolopax, var. elevatus, Waite, Mem.
AUIStE MUS. piv sLO90, Pa SOmple Vile, 2. Ti
Macrorhamphosus gallinago, Ogilby, Proc. Roy. Soc. Qld.,
Mexia) LOGS. ips 10:
In the Report of the ‘‘Thetis’’” Expedition, Waite noted
certain characters in which his specimens differed from the
published descriptions of M. scolopax, but in consideration of
the variations to which members of this genus are subject, he
regarded the Australian representative as but a variety of
that species. Having compared specimens of each, I
am able to point out that there are well marked specific
differences between them. Examples of M. elevatus of the
same size as others of M. scolopax are much deeper and have
shorter and thicker snouts. The variations in the lengths of
the spines in different specimens of M. scolopax have been
tabulated by Gunther,! and I find similar though less striking
variations in the Australian species, but it is always longer
and usually much longer than the snout in M. elevatus,
whereas it appears to be usually if not always shorter in M.
scolopax.
The large series of specimens available to me shows that
the relative depth of the body increases considerably with
age, but it is also clear that the exact form of the body differs
even in specimens of the same length. Under these circum-
stances I have no hesitation in “regarding M. gallinago,
Ogilby, as identical with M. elevatus, especially as there are
‘“Thetis’’ specimens which only differ from Ogilby’s descrip-
1 Gunther—Brit. Mus. Oat. Fish., iji., 1861, p. 519. ;
24 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
tion in having eighteen instead of sixteen anal rays.1 The
last dorsal spine is minute and often rudimentary, while the
position of the base of the second spine is altered by the
development or otherwise of the hump on the back.
In order to show the change with growth more clearly I
give a figure of the smallest specimen of the series for com-
parison with Waite’s figure of the adult. It is 66 mm. long
and was trawled off Cape Three Points, New South Wales,
in 32-40 fathoms.
As Centriscus scolopax, this species has been recorded from
Tasmania by Johnston,? and there is a specimen in the Aus-
tralian Museum collection from Ulverstone. The ‘‘Endea-
vour’’ trawled it at the following stations :—
Twenty miles off Babel Island, Bass Strait, 68 mene
Off the east coast of Bide Island, Bass Strait, 60
fathoms.
Disaster Bay, New South Wales, 45 fathoms.
Between Port Stephens and Sydney, New South Wales,
22-65 fathoms.
Ogilby’s specimen of M. gallinago came from the Tweed
River Heads at the northern boundary of New South Wales.
GENUS CENTRISCOPS, Gill.
CENTRISCOPS HUMEROSUS, Richardson.
(Plate v., and! fig.-9.)
Centriscus humerosus, Richardson, Voy. ‘‘Erebus’’ and
= error, | Fishes, 1846, pegs6, pl xxxiv., figs. 5-0; d--
Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii1., 1861, p. 522.
1 Mr. J. D. Ogilby has very kindly compared “Thetis” specimens with
his type and he informs me that he considers them to be identical. He
further notes that the latter has eighteen and not sixteen anal rays as
described, a mistake due to a printer’s error.
2 Johnston—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 123.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 25
As Richardson’s description and figure of this species
were prepared from a dried specimen which had apparently
shrunk considerably, they are very inaccurate. Certain errors
were corrected by Gunther in his later description of the same
specimen, so that it only remains to give reliable figures to
place the species on a sound basis.
My specimens differ from the original description in the
following details. None show the mesial row of small scutes
before the dorsal spine, while those on the sides and around
the vent are so differently arranged that they must have been
considerably distorted in the type. The ‘‘acute curved teeth
at the base in front’’ of the dorsal spine really represent a
small detached spine anteriorly, and a pair of lateral ones,
the latter being only occasionally developed. Finally, the
skin is not nearly so rough as figured, but is covered with
closely-set microscopic spines which give a veivety feel to
the touch.
te
>
LO IG. 9.
The form of the body changes greatly with growth, the
body becoming much deeper and the snout longer, while the
dorsal spines are greatly reduced. The eye is comparatively
larger in young specimens. Full grown specimens develop a
peculiar patch of bristles on the dorsal line just before the
hump of the back. They are also very beautifully coloured in
life, though the only tints remaining in my specimens are
delicate rose-pink areas on the breast and upper portion of the
sides which bear numerous large silvery spots and bars. A
silvery pink bar is present on the snout below and before the
eye. A broad oblique dark bar extends from behind the
26 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
pectorals to the origin of the anal, behind which is a similar
lighter band, and both are bordered with silvery streaks.
The smallest and largest specimens in the collection are the
two selected for illustration, and measure 70 mm. and 265
mm. respectively. Mr. Dannevig says this species is exceed-
ingly abundant in the deeper waters of southern Australia,
and one hundred and seventy-eight specimens were preserved
from the following localities :—
Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
Off Storm Bay, Tasmania.
Babel Island, near Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 68 fathoms.
East from E. Sister Island, Bass Strait, go fathoms.
Sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms.
Famiry SYNGNATHID.
GENUS CORYTHROICHTHYS, Kaup.
CORYTHROICHTHYS PHILLIPI, Lucas.
(Fig. 10.)
Syngnathus phillipi, Lucas, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. (n. ser.),
ill. LEOISnps kes
Four specimens of this species were obtained in Oyster
Bay, Tasmania. They differ from Lucas’ excellent descrip-
tion only in having the osseus rings and fin rays rather more
numerous which brings the formula up to the following :—
D. 25-28, osseus rings 18-19 + 44-48.
This species is very closely allied to the more northern C.
margaritifer, Peters, but is distinguished by having a larger
number of tail rings, the dorsal fin placed a little farther back
in relation to the vent, and by the greater development of the
ridges of the head and body, particularly the ventral keel.
FIG. 10.
| Corythroichthys intestinalis, Ramsay.
Having had occasion to compare the above-mentioned
specimens with Syngnathus intestinalis, Ramsay,! I dis-
covered that the types of that species were not Australian, as
has been generally supposed, but came from Bougainville
Island in the Solomon Group. Ramsay gave no locality, but
merely stated that they were taken from the intestinal cavity
1 Ramsay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 494.
FISHES.—MCOULLOCH. 27
of Holothuria. Duncker! considers this species to be syn-
onymous with C. cons picillatus, Jenyns,?2 together with several
other species described by Jordan and his colleagues. Having
examined all the material available to me, I am sure that
C. intestinalis and C. waitei, Jord. & Seale,3 are identical,
and, as I have recorded? the latter from Cooktown, Queens-
land, Ramsay’s species is rightly included in Australian
literature. |
GENUS SOLEGNATHUS, Swainson.
SOLEGNATHUS SPINOSISSIMUS, Giinther.
Spiny Sea-Horse.
Solenognathus spinosissimus, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish.
Vili, LOZO,)p: 195); 74-, Waites Proc) Linn: Soc. iN:S.
Wales, ix. (2), 1894, p. 222, pl. xvii., figs. 5 and 8.
Sixteen specimens of this species were preserved. They
were obtained in 15-45 fathoms in Shoalhaven Bight, New
South Wales.
SOLEGNATHUS FASCIATUS, Giinther.
Solenognathus fasciatus, Ginther, Chall. Rep., Zool., i.,
Teco, p. 20, pl xiv., fie. Bo; 1dyy Waite, Proc. Linn. ‘Soc:
N.S. Wales, ix. (2), 1894, pp. ‘220 and 227.
Duncker® considers this species to be identical with the pre-
ceding. I have carefully compared the thirteen specimens
obtained with those of S. spinosissimus and have endeavoured
to find some more definite character than the form of the
scutes to distinguish the two. They are, however, identical
in every other respect, and though this one difference holds
good in a large number of specimens, yet the species cannot
but be considered to be based on a very uncertain footing.
The scutes are well shown by Waite in the figures quoted.
Though several specimens have the pseudo-marsupium in
such a condition that it is evident that they were carrying eggs
when obtained, only two have them still attached. The most
perfect of these bears forty-five eggs, and it would seem that
only a very few are missing. ‘They are very similar to those
of S. spinosissimus as described by Waite, but are in a less
advanced stage of development, and are arranged in about
five very irregular rows commencing directly behind the vent
1 Duncker—Faun. Sudwest-Austr., ii., 1909, p. 237.
2 Jenyns—Zool. Beagle, iii., 1842, p. 147, pl. xxvii., fig. 4.
3 Jordan and Seale—Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., xxv., 1905 (1906), p. 212, fig. 17..
4 McCulloch—Proe. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxxv., 1910, p. 432.
5 Duncker—Faun. Sudwest-Austr., ii., 1909, p. 235.
28 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
and occupying thirteen tail-rings. “They were collected in
the latter part of November, 1909.
The specimens are from the following localities :—
South-east from Babel Island, off Flinders Island, Bass
Strait.
Disaster Bay, southern New South Wales.
SOLEGNATHUS ROBUSTUS, sp. nov.
(Platesec, tice 725)
D. 34, P. 24-25. Body rings, 26 + 50.
Head 6'4 in the length and 3°7 in the trunk. Length of tail
a little less than the distance between the vent and the pec-
torals, its depth behind the dorsal 3'2 in the base of that fin.
Snout 1°7 in the head, its depth nearly 5 in its length, and
less than the diameter of the eye which is 4°1 in the snout.
Narrowest interorbital width a little less than half the diameter
of the eye. Dorsal fin occupying ten body rings, the length
of its base almost equal to the distance between the tip of
the snout and the posterior border of the eye. The lateral
row of scutes is not continued along the side of the tail as in
S. hardwickii, but passes upwards and merges into the
supero-lateral row, though, owing to the upper surface being
very convex, this is less conspicuous than in S. spinosissimus
and S. fasciatus. Scutes of the body with radiating lines of
well-developed spines, and each with a stronger flattened one
in the centre. On the anterior portion of the body and sides
these central spines are higher than broad and_ widely
separated, but before the dorsal on the mid-line they become
broader ; on the tail, especially along the median superior and
inferior lines, they are much broader than high, and are
arranged so closely together as to form an almost continuous
keel. The whole head and space before the pectorals is
covered with uniform upstanding spines which are arranged
in radiating lines on the opercles. The last thirty tail rings
are prehensile and are provided with fleshy excrescences on
their inferior surfaces.
Total length, 300 mm. One specimen from 37 fathoms off
Flinders Island, South Australia, August 30th, 1909.
This species is easily distinguished from the others by its
broad snout and very thick tail, and also by the form of the
scutes. The following is a key to the Australian species :-—
a. Lateral row of scutes extending along the sides of the
tail, not merging into the upper row.
b. Scutes rugose but with scarcely any spines :—
hardwicki.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. ; 20
aa. Lateral row of scutes merging into those on the upper
edge of the tail behind the dorsal fin.
c. Depth of the tail behind the dorsal 4 or more in the
base of that fin. Depth of snout 6 or more in its
length.
d. Scutes intensely spiny and convex :—spinosissimus.
dd. Scutes rugose with one spine and flatter :—
fasciatus.
cc. Depth of the tail behind the dorsal about 3 in the base
of that fin. Depth of snout 5 in its length.
e. Scutes with rows of spines and little convex :—
robustus.
GENus Hippocampus, Rafinesque.
HippocAMPUS ABDOMINALIS, Lesson.
(Plate vi., figemu)
Hippocampus abdominalis, Lesson in Ferussac, Bull. Sci.
Nati xl. erO2 7 pe et27; td. Gunehers Brit.) Mus. Cat:
Fish., viii., 1870, p. 199; id., Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad.
Wiss. Wien., Ixxx., i., p. 420; 1d., Johnston, Proc. Roy.
Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 135; id-, Waite, Rec. Cantb.
Nisa Noy skoo7,.p. 16sntdemloc. cit. TOM. ps 175.
pl. xxviii. ; id.. Duncker, Faun. Siidwest-Austr. ii., 1909,
P24 7-
The specimen figured is a very large one from Merimbula,
near Twofold Bay, New South Wales, where this species is.
said to be common. It is recorded from New Zealand, Tas-
mania and Victoria, while Gunther records a specimen in the
British Museum from Sydney which was presented by Sir
John Richardson. If this specimen really came from Port
Jackson the species must be very rare here, as it has not been
included in any of the catalogues of New South Wales fishes,
nor have any local specimens come under my notice.
HIPPOCAMPUS GRACILIFORMIS, Sp. nov.
(Plate-vi., figemen}
Din 27 coke LO INI Ss h2) =} 452
Body slender, its greatest depth being only 1°5 the width
behind the pectorals. Tail nearly twice as long as the dis-
tance between the tip of the coronet and the vent. Snout
very short and thick, as long as the postorbital portion of the
head. Eye 12 in the snout. Supra-orbital spines low and
triangular, converging before the eyes where they form a
prominent keel on the proximal portion of the snout. Behind
the eyes the profile extends obliquely upwards to just before
30 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
the coronet where it is notched. The coronet is quadrangular
with very indistinct tubercles and ridges. Tubercles of the
body almost uniformly obtuse, the lateral row a little more
developed than the others; below the dorsal fin those of the
back are somewhat enlarged. On the tail the fifth, ninth and
twelfth are prominent. None of the tubercles bear filaments.
The dorsal fin stands on four body and three tail rings; its-
anterior portion is damaged but it appears to have had
twenty-seven rays.
Colour.—Light brown, the tail with nine darker cross-
bands. The head has large scattered dark spots arranged
around the eye and on the snout, and there are others on the
sides and under surfaces of the anterior portion of the body.
Total length 87 mm.
One specimen taken somewhere near Bass Strait, but the
exact locality is unknown.
The large number of rays in the dorsal fin distinguishes this
from all other Australian species except H. abdominalis,
Lesson. From that species it is easily separated by its slender
body, the form of the supraocular spines and coronet, and the
poor development of the tubercles.
Famity SCOMBRESOCID.
GENUS SCOMBRESOX, Lacepede.
SCOMBRESOX FORSTERI, Cuvier and Valenciennes.
Scombresox forsteri, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat.
Poiss., xvili., 1846, p. 481.
A single specimen was taken in a landing net at night,
one hundred and twenty miles south-south-west of St. Francis
Island, South Australia.
Famity EXOCCETIDAS.
GeNuS Exonautes, Jordan and Evermann.
EXONAUTES SPECULIGER, Cuvier and Valenciennes.
Flying Fish.
Exoceetus speculiger, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat.
Poissa. XIx.,, 1526, (p: 194k
Cypsilurus speculiger, Jordan and Seale, Bull. U.S. Bur.
Hisht, xxv.,.1905 (1906)*ipa zoo, fig. 13"
A single specimen agreeing perfectly with the descriptions
and figure quoted was obtained between Port Stephens and
Newcastle, New South Wales.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 31
Famity ATHERINIDA.
GENUS ATHERINA, Linneus.
ATHERINA DANNEVIGI, sp. nov.
(Plate xvi., fig. 2.)
Dee vintsine i en Ae i:
Seales 173-75:
<2=03. Meet o=TA cat Ni 1.) Ge edie
Body very elongate, the depth 6’5 to 7°3 in the length to
the hypural. Head 4 to 4°3. Eye 3 to 3% in the head, equal
to or longer than the snout.
Mouth oblique, not very large, the gape reaching almost
to the anterior orbital rim; maxillary continued backwards to
below the anterior third of the eye. The teeth are exceedingly
minute and appear to be present on the jaws, vomer and
palatines. Gill-rakers slender, equal to about half the length
of the eve, sixteen on the lower limb of the first arch. Upper
surface of the head flat, the interorbital width equal to the
diameter of the eye. Muciferous system well developed, with
large open pores. A row of about nine commences on the
snout and extends over the eye, then downwards and along
the upper margin of the opercles. Nine more are arranged
from behind the eye, around the angle of the preoperculum to
the mouth, where they join another row running along the
margin of the preorbital. Five more pores are found along
each ramus of the lower jaw.
Scales extending forwards on the back as far as the hinder
portion of the eye, and there are about thirty-nine along the
mid-line of the back to the first dorsal, and twenty-four
between the two dorsals. Those on the sides of the body are
rounded but for a small median lobe which gives them an
angular appearance. ‘There are three rows on the cheeks and
about seven on the operculum. They also extend well onto
the base of the caudal fin.
Origin of the first dorsal behind the ventrals but well before
the middle of the distance between the tip of the snout and the
base of the tail; second spine longest, equal to two-thirds or
more of the space between the tip of the snout and the hinder
orbital margin. Soft dorsal commencing over the first third of
the anal, its third ray a trifle shorter than the longest spines.
Anal similar to the soft dorsal but with a longer base. Origin
of ventrals almost midway between the snout and the end of
the anal, or a little nearer the latter. Pectorals reaching to
above the base of the ventrals. Vent between the ventrals
and rather nearer their tips than their bases.
Colour.—Sandy yellow (in formalin), each scale of the
back margined with a row of minute brown dots. A silver
32 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS
band, which is rather wider than the row of scales it covers,
is uniformly dotted with minute brown specks, and may or
may not be defined by a black line above. Occiput darker.
Described from three specimens 75 to 85 mm. long from two
stations—Spencer’s Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms, and
the entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Selected type 75 mm.
long from the latter locality.
This is distinguished from all other Australian species by
its very small scales. It is apparently nearest to A. hep-
setoides, Richardson,! but the description of that species 1s
so imperfect I am unable to compare it satisfactorily.
Richardson, however, compared his species with A. hepsetus,
Linn., to which, as his name denotes, he considered it very
similar. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens are so very different
in appearance from the latter that I have little doubt they
are distinct from Richardson’s species also, and this, together
with the fact that they come from somewhat deep water
induces me to describe them as new.
GENUS TA:NIOMEMBRAS, Ogilby.
T@niomembras, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxiii.
1898, p. 41.
Ogilby has erected this genus for Atherina microstoma,
Gunther, considering that it differs from Atherina by (1) its
more elongate body, (2) pointed snout, (3) small mouth, (4)
stronger dentition, (5) shorter, stouter and fewer gill-rakers.
I regard 1, 2 and q as being of specific value only, but 3 and
5 may perhaps be conveniently used to split up the large
number of Australian species of Atherina. Notwithstanding
Ginther’s statement, ‘‘teeth conspicuous in the jaws and on
the vomer,’’ Ogilby describes the latter as smooth, while he
finds a single row on the palatines. These are lacking in the
specimens described below, but the vomerine teeth are well
developed.
‘TENIOMEMBRAS MICROSTOMA, Giinther.
(Plate xe. 2.)
Atherina microstoma, Ginther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii.,.
1861, p. 401; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
Vi.; Loot, p. 395 2d., Johnston, Proc. Roy. /Soc.)iasm.,
1882 (1883), p. 122, and 1890 (1891), p. 34.
Br. (627.5 (D-ewi.-vil. 10-DT seaeeti-12 5 P. raotae Wie Bi oe
C207; sc. lat 38-40; Sc. trae:
1 Richardson—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., xi. (1), 1843, p. 178.
SE ee Ee ay 23
Height of the body 52-7, length of the head 4-44 in the
length to the hypural. Eye 3, a little wider than the inter-
orbital space, snout 44 in the head. Depth of the caudal
peduncle a little less than the width of the eye.
Body moderately elongate, somewhat compressed, its
breadth equal to about two-thirds of its height. Head flat
above with a series of very large pores extending from the
snout, over the eye, to a canal above the operculum. A
second series crosses the snout in front of the eye and follows
the preorbital, joining another which extends around the
margins of the preoperculum. There is a series on each
ramus of the lower jaw, and a single pore behind the eye. A
few large scales on the upper surface of the head extending
forward to the eyes, snout and preorbital region bare. A
single row of large scales on the cheek, and three rows on the
operculum; a single row on the sub- and interoperculum.
Mouth small, the maxillary not reaching the anterior margin
of the eye; jaws subequal. Teeth minute but distinct, in
several rows on the anterior parts of both jaws, none on the
sides; a well-developed patch on the vomer, palatines tooth-
less. Gill-rakers short and stout, the longest less than a third
the length of the eye; about fifteen on the first arch.
Scales of the body large, cycloid and concentrically striated.
There are thirty-eight to forty on the silvery lateral band from
behind the base of the pectoral to the hypural, and eight in a
transverse series not counting the median ones on the back
and belly. There are fourteen to fifteen between the nape and
the first dorsal fin.
Origin of the dorsal a little behind that of the ventrals, and
a little nearer the end of the snout than the hypural. The
spines are very weak and flexible, the second and third the
longest, subequal, and about half as long again as the eye.
The distance between the first spines of the two dorsals
equals that between the end of the second and the hypural.
Anal originating well in advance of the second dorsal, the
length of its base once and a half in its distance from the
hypural. Margins of the pectorals rounded, the second and
third upper rays the longest, not quite reaching the vertical
of the ventrals. Ventrals reaching back a little more than
half their distance from the anal, the vent placed between their
tips.
Colour.—Whitish in formalin with a broad dark silvery
lateral band along the fourth row of scales. The upper parts
of the head and back are densely spotted with minute olive
green dots, which also border the scales of the body above the
lateral band and sometimes those below it as well. All the
fins with more or less numerous scattered dots on the rays.
34 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Described from five specimens, about 63 mm. long, taken
in the estuary of the Derwent River, Tasmania, by Mr. E.
F. Lovett, who presented them to the Australian Museum.
Two other very battered specimens are in the ‘‘Endeavour”’
collection from Storm Bay, Tasmania. They differ from
Gunther’s description only in being rather more slender, in
having one ray less in the anal fin, and in the position of the
silvery lateral band, but I do not regard any of these as being
of much importance.
Famity STROMATEIDA.
GENUS SERIOLELLA, Guichenot.
SERIOLELLA BRAMA, Giinther.
Snotgall Trevally, Trevalla.
(Plate 1x yiies 1.)
Neptonemus brama, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii., 1860,
p:! 390;)7¢d-5) Johnston, (Proce Roy. Soc, asm.) s1s82
(1883), pp. 85 and 120.
Neptonemus? travale, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i.,
LO72 5p los
Seriolella brama, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), x., 1902,
Pp. 1295102, Waite, Ree!?Cantb, Muss,/1-. 1911.) 9.82295
pls:
Notwithstanding the numerous differences appearing in the
two descriptions of S. brama and S. trevale, | agree with Regan
that they represent but one species. I think there can be no
doubt that my specimens are correctly identified with S.
brama, while the fact that they were recognised as the
common trevalla or trevally of the Melbourne markets by Mr.
Dannevig bears out their association with S. trevale which
was originally obtained from that source.
I have examined over a dozen specimens from various
localities extending from Tasmania to Port Jackson and find
the variation in the number of fin-rays and spines to be con-
siderable, as the following selected examples will show :—
(i) Der wais, oi.) 30';A., ii., se2nmbered-.) (2) 1) avi iigyesia rine
Hines set.) (3) Di vil. ue eoreA- Pil. 2p 5 Ps eon (Aaa
ii. 32; A. ill. 23; P. 20. The lengths of the spines before the
second dorsal are very variable, and the second may be
replaced by a jointed ray. The disagreement in the propor-
tions of the head and body, as given by the two authors, is
doubtless accounted for by a different system of measuring
adopted by each. The depth in my specimens is about 2°6 in
the length to the hypural and 3°4 in that to the tip of the
tail. The only other important difference is in the armature of
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 35
the preoperculum, as described by Castelnau, but I find this
to be a very unreliable character, some specimens having the
ridges and denticulations distinctly, though feebly, developed,
while in others there is no trace of them.
The following description is drawn up from all the material
available to me :—
DO Vi=Vily i.-t. 820-3300 0A. lil. vemeass Bs 20-27) Vi t5 5
C. 17; 1. lat. about 90. Depth 2°6, head 34 to 34, pectoral
3 to 3°4, base of dorsal 1°7, base of anal 3 to 3°2 in length
to the hypural. Caudal peduncle 3'5. Eye-opening 4 to 4°5.
Vertical diameter of orbit 3°4 to 4 in the head.
Body compressed, rather deep, its dorsal and ventral pro-
files almost equally arched, covered with moderate cycloid
scales, those of the lateral line somewhat smaller than the
others. Caudal peduncle narrow. Whole upper surface and
sides of the head covered with a thick fleshy skin which largely
hides the scales and other characters beneath it. Snout tumid,
the nostrils placed close together and nearer the end of the
snout than the eye, the anterior the largest and rounded, the
posterior slit-like. Mouth oblique, maxillary small and weak,
and reaching to or a little beyond the vertical of the anterior
margin of the eye. Preorbital narrow, its margin smooth or
crenulated. Eye large, placed in the middle line of the head.
Bones of the head very weak, their margins either feebly
denticulated or smooth; posterior margin of the preoperculum
emarginate, the angle produced and broadly rounded. Oper-
culum terminating in a very thin flat point margined with
skin. Teeth extremely fine and small, arranged in a single
row on each jaw; vomer, palatines and tongue toothless.
Dorsal fin commencing a little before, over, or behind the
base of the pectoral; the spinous portion is low and the middle
spines the longest. If present, the second spine of the second
dorsal is generally higher than any of those of the first; the
second and third rays are the longest and about as long as
the distance between the tip of the snout and the hinder
margin of the eye. The two first spines of the anal are short
and thick and somewhat detached from the rest of the fin;
third spine longer and weaker and adpressed to the first ray.
Soft portion of the fin similar to, but lower than, the second
dorsal. Pectoral falcate reaching to or beyond the vertical of
the first anal ray. Ventrals rather small, placed below the
posterior base of the pectorals, and reaching about two-thirds
of the distance between their insertion and the vent. Caudal
deeply forked.
Colour.—Body with large somewhat irregular blotches dis-
tributed over its upper half, of which the most conspicuous is a
36 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
dark rounded one at the origin of the lateral line. Two large
and less distinct marks descend from the origin and middle of
the second dorsal to below the lateral line, and besides these
there are numerous smaller markings scattered over the body.
These markings have not been noted by Castelnau, whose
description was prepared from fresh specimens, and as all
mine have lost most of their scales it may be that they are
not shown or are indistinct in perfect examples. A dark bar
extends vertically across the eye which is otherwise golden.
Dorsal, anal, pectorals and ventrals dusky, especially towards
their margins.
Fifteen specimens were preserved from the following
localities :—
Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms.
Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40
fathoms.
Oyster Bay, Tasmania.
SERIOLELLA PUNCTATA, Forster.
(Plate: x. teat. )
Gasterosteus punctatus, Forster, in Bloch and Schneider,
Syst. [chthe. reo, ‘p. 36:
Neptonemus bilineatus, Hutton, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., v.,
RO7Z2— (P- e20leupla Vall.
Seriolella bilineata, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), x.,
1902, .P-, 120:
Seriolella punctata, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i., 1911, p. 231,
pl. li.
Di ivi--vils 34-39; A. ii. 22-24 eee 2o0-22— Vou. 55°C. 17:
Depth 3°3 to 4, head 3°4 to 3°6, pectoral about 4, base of
dorsal 1°7, and base of anal 3°8 in the length to the hypural.
Caudal peduncle 4 to 4°5, eye-opening 4°8 to 55, vertical
diameter of the orbit 3°4 to 3°8 in the head.
Body compressed, elongate, the dorsal and ventral profiles
evenly arched, upper parts covered with large pores. Caudal
peduncle narrow. Upper surface and sides of the head
covered with a thick fleshy porous skin which hides the scales
and other characters beneath it. Snout somewhat fleshy and
rounded. Nostrils close together, nearer the tip of the snout
than the eye; the posterior longer than the anterior which is
round. Mouth oblique; maxillary rather narrow and weak,
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 27,
extending to or beyond the vertical of the anterior margin of
the eye. Preorbital narrow. Eye moderate, placed a little
above the mid-line of the head. Opercular bones very weak,
and with smooth margins in all my specimens, but they are
doubtless subject to the same variation as in S. brama.
Posterior margin of the preoperculum oblique and usually a
little emarginate, the angle produced and broadly rounded;
operculum terminating in a very thin flat point margined with
skin.
Dorsal fin commencing a little behind the vertical of the
base of the pectoral; the spinous portion is low and the middle
spines are the longest. The third or fourth rays are the
longest, but are shorter than the distance between the tip of
the snout and the hinder margin of the eye. The two first
spines of the anal are very small and more or less hidden in
the skin; the third is longer and adpressed to the first ray.
Soft portion of the fin similar to, but lower than that of the
dorsal. Pectoral falcate not nearly reaching the vertical of
the vent. Ventrals small, inserted just behind the pectorals
and reaching one-third or more of the distance between them
and the anal. Caudal forked.
Colour.—Body with numerous small round spots along the
middle line, and a large dark mark behind the head, near the
base of the lateral line, which is deeper than broad. A dark
vertical bar across the eye. Pectorals, dorsal and anal fins
dusky, especially towards their margins. Ventrals and caudal
lighter.
Longest specimen 280 mm.
Seriolella porosa, Guichenot,! is said to differ from S.
punctata in being more slender, the depth being 4 to 44 in the
length as against 33 to 33. The original figure of that species,
however, agrees very well in this respett with my specimens
of S. punctata. Regan* considers the Tasmanian S. dobula,
Gunther, to be synonymous with S. porosa, and I think it
possible that both will prove to be merely variations of
Forster’s species, though I have seen no specimens in which
the depth is 44 in the length as described by Gunther.
Two specimens were preserved which were taken between
Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60
fathoms, and seven others from the Victorian coast and from
Oyster Bay, Tasmania.
1 Guichenot in Gay—Fauna Ohilena, Pisces, 1847, p. 238; Atlas ii., Ichth.
pistvil-; Le) 2:
2 Regan—Ann. Mag. Nat Hist. (7), x., 1902, p. 128.
38 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Famity GADIDA.
GeENnuS PuysIcuLus, Kaup.
PHYSICULUS BARBATUS, Giinther.
Rock Cod, Cape Cod, Red Cod.
Pseudophycis barbatus, Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3),
XI, 1663, p. 116; id., Gastelnau, Proc. Zool.-Acclim.
SoCs Vict, 1872, p.mio2;-id.. (McCoys Jerodry Zool:
Vict ppl xx.)31578; tdee|ohnston, Proc: Royse soc:
Tasm., 1882 (1883), pp. 88 and 126.
Physiculus palmatus, Klunzinger, Arch. fur. Naturg.,
XK ielo7e. Pp. 3o:
Lotella grandis, Ramsay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v
1881, p. 462.
Physiculus barbatus, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club,
1904, p. 24.
Only one specimen of this common southern species was
preserved. It is fifteen inches long and was obtained off Cape
Everard, Victoria, in 70 fathoms.
There seems to ine little doubt that P. pialmoalns Klunzinger,
from Hobson’s Bay, Port Phillip, is identical with the common
Victorian Rock Cod since the description agrees perfectly with
that given by McCoy of the latter species. The fact that
Klunzinger compared his fish with P. breviusculus, Richard-
son, only, indicates that he was unaware of Gunther’s species.
wt i
Famity MACROURID.
GENUS CGLORHYNCHUS, Guiorna.
Cc:LORHYNCHUS AUSTRALIS, Richardson.
Lepidoleprus australis, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., ae
p. 100, and Trans. Zool. Soc., m., 1849, p. 151, pl. Vill.
ree ae ;
Macrurus australis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., iv., 1862,
Pp: 301; 1d.4 Johnston, Proce, Roy. Soc, Lasm., 1982
(1883), p. 127; id., Giinther, Chall. Rept., Zool., xxii.,
1807. Pp. '27.
Celorhynchus mortoni, Ogilby, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1896
(1897), p- 83. ;
Ceelorhynchus australis, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., 1., 1911,
Boul] Zane ys pl. XXUKS neal
When recording Optonurus denticulatus from New South
Wales I noted! that several specimens lacked the ends-of their
1 McCulloch—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1907, p. 346.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 39
tails, and that in one the dorsal and anal fins had grown
together around the injured portion, thereby giving it the
appearance of being perfect. Many examples of C. australis
in the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection exhibit this same peculiarity,
some having the tail so truncated and the anal rays so com-
plete around it that they almost seem to have heterocercal
instead of leptocercal tails. Dissection shows that the injured
vertebra spreads out into a cartilaginous fan somewhat
resembling a true hypural bone, to which the rays are movably
articulated.
A large series of specimens, seventy-five in number, con-
clusively proves that C. mortoni, Ogilby (the type specimen
of which is lost), is identical with Richardson’s species, and
that the differences noted between the two are nearly all due
to the one having a more perfect and therefore longer tail
than the other. The only character that cannot be so
explained lies in the armature of the scales, Ogilby counting
18 to 23 ridges in C. mortoni, while C. australis is said to have
12 to 18 only. I find that the number varies according to the
size of the specimens, my smallest having only six ridges,
whereas a large scale in a big example has twenty-two.
When fresh, the specimens were greyish with darker bands
extending along the body and occupying the overlapping por-
tions of each row of scales. There is a more or less distinct
dark band between the eyes, and the operculum is blackish.
Upper half of the first dorsal black with a lighter margin.
Anal dark with a white border. Pectorals and ventrals dusky
with lighter edges.
Specimens were preserved from off Storm Bay, Tasmania,
60 fathoms, and from Oyster Bay, Tasmania.
FaMiLty BERYCIDA:.
GENUS AUSTROBERYX, gen. nov.
Body rather deep, compressed, covered with moderately
large, ctenoid scales which are regularly arranged. Abdomen
trenchant, with a row of slightly enlarged, keeled scales.
Head large, with thin bones and high ridges which have deep
muciferous cavities between them; the exposed bones rough
with raised striz. Snout short, mouth oblique, the chin
prominent. Eye large. Jaws, vomer and palatines with
villiform teeth. Opercles serrated ; operculm with two spines,
preoperculum with more or less strongly developed spines on
its inner border. Dorsal with six or seven spines which in-
crease regularly in height, and eleven to fourteen soft rays.
Anal with four spines and twelve to fourteen rays, its base
shorter than that of the dorsal. Ventrals with one spine and
seven rays.
40 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS
Type Beryx affinis, Gunther. B. gerrardi, Gunther, and
B_ lineatus, Cuvier and Valenciennes, also belong to this
genus. They are distinguished from Beryx, Cuvier (type B.
decadactylus, Cuv. and Val.), by having the anal shorter than
the dorsal and composed of only 12-14 rays instead of 26-30.
The bones of the head also appear to be more strongly armed,
and the suborbitals are broader.
Regan! has placed Beryx affinis, Gunther, and its allies in
the genus Hoplopteryx, Agassiz?, of which most of the species
are Cretaceous fossils. Judging from Woodward's restoration
of H. lewesiensis,3 Mantell, however, the recent forms seem to
differ in having the opercular bones more strongly armed and
in having much smaller scales.
Note on the genera Trachichthys, Shaw and Nodder, and
Hoplostethus, Cuvier and Valenciennes.—It would seem that
Trachichthys (type T. australis, Shaw & Nodder) is a mono-
typic genus characterised by having three dorsal and two anal
spines which are placed close together, and, like the rays, are
entirely covered with minute asperities. Minute tuberculiform
teeth are crowded on the jaws, vomer and palatines.
Gunther‘ counted three spines and twelve rays in the dorsal,
and two spines and ten rays in the anal of the type specimen
Obi. vadstvalis: McCoy® describes iv./11 and iii./g (10)
respectively, but has mistaken the anterior rays for spines,
while Waite® expressly states that there are three and not two
anal spines in Trachichthys. I have counted nine specimens
of T. australis, and find the number of spines and rays to be as
stated by Gunther.
Boulenger’ has united Hoplostethus with Trachichthys, re-
garding some Australian and New Zealand species (T. inter-
medius, Hector, and T. elongatus, Gunther) as intermediate
between the two. Both these fishes, however, bear little
resemblance to T. australis, haying four and six dorsal spines
and three anal spines which are well separated, and which,
together with the rays, are not covered with minute asperities.
They are much nearer to Hoplostethus (type H. mediter-
vaneus, Cuv. & Val.), but both differ from that genus, as
2 Agassiz—Poiss. Foss., iv., 1838, p. 4.
3 Woodward—Brit. Mus. Cat. Foss. Fish., iv., 1901, p. 398, fig. 31.
4 Gunther—Cat. Fish. Brit. Mus., i., 1859, p. 10.
5 McCoy—Prodr. Zool. Vict., 1886, pl. cxiv.
6 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 66.
7 Boulenger—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), ix., 1902, p. 202.
8 Jordan & Fowler—Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxvi., 1902, p. 7.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 41
vomerine teeth, while T. elongatus also has only four instead
of six dorsal spines. In all other respects, however, they
agree with Hoplostethus, T. intermedius indeed being very
closely allied to H. mediterraneus, so that I think it better to
expand the limits of that genus to include them rather than
form an unnatural group by uniting Hoplostethus and Tra-
chichthys.
AUSTROBERYX GERRARDI. Giinther.
(Plate viii.).
Beryx "Gerrardt, (Gunther, Ann. Mage Nat. THuist:) (5), xx,
1887, p. 238, fig.
BEmocw OY Viena nA. ive, 12-1 Jemeaeiar Ws 15. 7s. Gs
l. lat. 36-39; 1. tr. 6 + 11. Height 118-2, head 24-22 in
the length to the hypural. Eye 24 in the head. Interorbital
width slightly less than % of the eye, and equal to the length
of the snout. Base of the anal 2 that of the dorsal which
equals the length of the head. Caudal peduncle # of the eye
and almost equal to the post-orbital portion of the head.
Body short and deep. Upper profile very convex from the
snout to the first dorsal spine which marks its highest point.
The curve from the snout to the ventral fin is much less than
that of the back; the line between the ventrals and the anal
is straight and bears 9-11 keeled scales which decrease in
size backwards.
Maxillary reaching to below the posterior third of the eye,
stiliform anteriorly but very broad behind; there is a small
rough patch of spines on the narrow portion which is in con-
tact with the supplemental bone, but the rest is smooth.
Supplemental bone with numerous ridges each ending in
spines. Turbinal bones bilobed and margined with sharp
spines. Preorbital denticulated, without a curved spine but
with a slight notch at its upper end to receive a blunt spine
projecting from the maxillary. Bones of the infraorbital arch
spine-like and roughened. Interorbital space narrowest above
the middle of the eye, becoming a little wider forwards, then
narrowing again towards the nostrils. Supraciliary edges
finely denticulated, terminating anteriorly above the nostrils;
between these are two curved, slightly roughened ridges
which approach each other at either end and enclose a some-
what elliptical area, with truncate ends, which is 34-4 times as
long as broad. Above the first third of the eye these ridges
each give off a branch which again divides and passes back-
wards ending in some rather strong spines some distance
before the suprascapular.
Preoperculum with two parallel margins, the hinder borders
of which are serrated ; the angle of the inner margin is formed
42 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
of two flattened, denticulated spines, while that of the outer
is armed with smaller simple spines. Both lower borders.
finely denticulated. Operculum narrow, its anterior half
covered with scales, the posterior portion with coarse striz
ending in marginal points; two strong spines on the upper
portion of the bone. Subopercle with one or two small spines
at its lowest point. Interoperculum with a broad notch near
its junction with the subopercle, its angle and lower border
striated and finely denticulated. Margin of the suprascapular
denticulated, its lower portion with an oblique ridge terminat-
ing in some enlarged spines.
Nostrils more widely separated than in A. affinis, the hinder
ones being very close to the orbital margins. First bran-
chiostegals very slender, second to fifth broad and denti-
culated below, the others smooth. Gill-rakers very long and
slender posteriorly, about half as long as the eye; twenty-two
on the lower limb of the first arch. Exceedingly fine villiform
teeth on the jaws without larger ones near the middle. A
small triangular patch on the vomer and a long cuneiform
band on each palatine bone.
With the exception of the form of the ridges on top of the
head, the position of the nostrils and the absence of enlarged
teeth, all the characters of the head are almost exactly similar
to those of young A. affints.
Dorsal spines gradually increasing in length, the last 14-14
as long as the eye and 2 the length of the second ray; all are
more or less angular and striated. Second ray the longest,
about 24 as long as the last. The first anal spine is placed
below the third dorsal ray, the fourth equals the fifth dorsal
spine in length and is about # as long as the second ray; the
last ray is placed far behind that of the dorsal. Pectoral not
quite ? in the head and reaching to above the base of the
anterior anal rays. Ventrals with strong, flattened, striated
spines, 3 as long as the rays which extend to the base of the
fourth anal spine. Caudal deeply forked, the lobes somewhat
pointed and about equal to the head in length.
All the scales rather coarsely denticulated, the external half
of their exposed surfaces with smooth ridges ending in mar-
ginal teeth. Bases of the dorsal and anal fins protected by
sheaths formed of several rows of scales, the outermost of
which is the largest. A small patch of scales on the cheeks.
A large angular scale at the axil of the ventral fin. Lateral
line straight, each scale with a median excavation.
Colourless in formalin.
Described from twelve specimens, 150-200 mm. in length.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 43
This species is distinguished from A. affinis and A.
lineatus by its small number of scales on the lateral line,
different fin formulz and by its short and deep form.
Trawled in 37 fathoms off Flinders Island, Investigator
Group, South Australia.
AUSTROBERYX AFFINIS, Giinther.
Nanny gai.
(Bites oa 1.)
Beryx affinis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i., 1859, p. 13;
and Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xx., 1887, p. 238, fig. ;
id., Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, p. 60, pl. xxi. ;
id., Stead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 48, pl. xvii.
Hoplopteryx affinis, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), vii.,
Piss el):
This species is extremely variable with age, the young
being short bodied and round, and the depth only 22 in the
total length, while large specimens are much more elongate
with the depth 34. The form and armature of the bones of the
head is essentially the same in both, but those of the young
have much more spinate edges, and their surfaces are smooth
and with but few ridges. The same remarks apply to the
ms
a7 iG 4
OBB "SRE.
FIG. 11.
scales which have very coarsely denticulated edges and almost
smooth surfaces; in the adult the denticulations are much
finer and they are continued back as ridges almost half way
across the exposed portions of the scales. The accompanying
figure represents my smallest specimen (7o mm. long).
44 “ENDEAVOUR” SOIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Constant characters appear to be afforded by the number of
spines and rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and the number
of perforated scales along the lateral line. In nine examples
23-16 inches long, I find them to be as follows :—D. vii./11-12,
A. iv./12, lateral line 42-44.
Gunther has stated that the length of the head equals the
height of the body. As this character has been used in com-
parison with other species, it is worth noting that it is con-
siderably shorter in all the specimens I have seen, and is
shown to be so in all the figures published.
Only three specimens were preserved in the ‘‘Endeavour”’
collection which came from the east coast of Flinders Island,
Bass Strait, and sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria,
60-70 fathoms.
GENUS PARATRACHICHTHYS, Waite.
PARATRACHICHTHYS TRAILLI, Hutton..
Paratrachichthys trailli, Hutton—Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus.,
iv., 1899, p. 65.
Waite noted that the number and form of the abdominal
scutes of his single specimen differed slightly from the des-
criptions and figure of Tvachichthys macleayi, Johnston, and
T. trailli, Hutton. In the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens I find
from twelve to sixteen scutes, and the first either divided or
single, and with one median or two lateral spines. This,
therefore, proves the identity of T. macleay: with Hutton’s
species.
Referring to the vomerine teeth, Waite states that the patch
could be covered by a pin’s head. This agrees well with most
of my specimens, but in others they are entirely wanting.
The collection includes seventeen specimens from off the
east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms, and
Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
Famity MONOCENTRID/.
GENUS Monocentris, Bloch and Schneider.
MONOCENTRIS GLORIA-MARIS, de Vis.
Knight Fish.
Monocentris gloria-maris (de Vis.)—Waite, Mem. Austr.
Mus., iv., 1899, p. 67, pl. vili., figs. 1-2, and Rec. Austr.
Mims: Vi... 1905,,p. GO:
Two specimens were obtained fifteen miles off Saddle Hill,
New South Wales, in 35 fathoms.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH.
FaMILy PEMPHERID.
GENUS PEMPHERIS, Cuvier.
PEMPHERIS MULTIRADIATA, Klunzinger.
Pempheris multiradiatus, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss.
VER px. Iw rOZO. p.. 3S1.
Pempheris macrolepis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
Wales, v., 1881, p. 516; id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus.,
IV LOGO, Ps 735. Plax
Pempheris lineatus, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, x.,
1886, p. 447.
Having carefully examined all the material at my disposal,
I have no doubt that P. multiradiata is identical with P.
macrolepis, as has been suggested by Macleay.1 Klunzinger’s
description agrees exactly with my specimens which come
from various localities between the Bellinger River, New
South Wales, and Kingston, South Australia. In twelve
examples I find the following number of fin-rays and scales :-—
D. v./11-13, A. i1./32-38, lateral line to the hypural 46-so.
Waite (loc. cit.) has suggested that P. multiradiata is
identical with P. compressa, Shaw, but I can see no reason
for this conclusion. The former has most of its scales cycloid,
only those on the anterior and lower portion of the head,
breast, and on the back before the dorsal fin being ctenoid.
In P. compressa all are very distinctly ctenoid, and they are
much smaller, there being 62-64 along the lateral line instead
of only 46-50.
The *‘Endeavour’’ specimens were taken at the following
stations :—
Off Bellengen, New South Wales, 40-52 fathoms.
Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales,
22-60 fathoms.
Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island and north of Goose
Island, Bass Strait.
Forty miles off Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms.
PEMPHERIS AFFINIS, sp. nov.
(Plate vii., Fig. 1.)
De yepplO-Lin Aamo; P. 16a 62 °C. rei lat:
60-62; |. tr. 7 + 19. Depth 23-23, head 33-34 in the length
to the hypural. Eye 2-2} in the head; interorbital width 14-
1} in the eye and about twice as wide as the snout is long.
Depth of caudal peduncle # of the eye.
1 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884. p. 21
46 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Body rather deep; the profile arched to the first dorsal,
thence straight to the tail. Lower profile forming an even
curve to the origin of the anal, the base of which is very
oblique. Interorbital space convex. Maxilla reaching to
slightly behind the middle of the eye, and covered with large,
rough ctenoid scales. Preoperculum with a very strong spine
at the angle and one or two weaker ones on each border.
Operculum with two very small flat points separated by a
broad excavation ; above and close to the upper one are several
small points which may be indistinct. Whole head, with the
exception of the tip of the snout and the lips, covered with
moderately large scales which are mostly cycloid, only those
of the preorbital and lower portion of the head being ctenoid.
Upper jaw with an outer row of large canines which increase
in size as they approach the median toothless excavation;
anteriorly there is an inner row of smaller teeth behind them.
Lower jaw with a few large teeth directed outwards anteriorly,
and two rows of smaller teeth along the sides which become
united into one about half way back. A row of small conical
teeth is present on each side of the vomer, and still smaller
ones form bands on the palatines. Posterior gill-rakers long
and slender, more than one-third the length of the eye; there
are twenty-three on the lower limb of the first arch.
On the back, in front of the dorsal fin, and also on the
ventral surface, except on the bases of and between the ven-
trals, the scales are extremely rough and ctenoid; their edges
are turned obliquely outwards from the body, and they are
firm and adherent. The rest of the body is covered with large,
flat, cycloid scales which are only marked with very fine con-
centric striz, and are very deciduous. ‘The lateral line is
continued to the end of the middle caudal rays, and has 60-62
scales as far as the hypural and fifteen more to the end. The
exposed portion of each scale is smooth and smaller than those
on either side of it, and the edges are broken both above and
below the canal by small rounded indentations.
Origin of the dorsal well behind the vertical of the ventral
spine; the distance between it and the end of the snout is
slightly less than half that between the same point and the
end of the middle caudal rays. ‘The fifth spine is more than
two-thirds the length of the second ray, which is equal to
three-fourths or more of the length of the head. The base of
the anal is 24 that of the dorsal, and its anterior rays are as
long as the last dorsal spine; the first spine is placed below the
last dorsal ray. Third pectoral ray the longest, reaching to
above the fourth anal ray. Ventrals placed beneath the
pectorals and reaching backwards to the vent.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 47
Colour.—Body everywhere closely speckled with minute red-
‘dish-brown dots which are more crowded on the back and head.
Dorsal, caudal and ventrals tipped with black, while the anal
also has a narrow black border. With the exception of these
markings and some crowded dots on the anterior portion of
the dorsal and on the caudal lobes, the fins are colourless.
Described from four specimens 96-135 mm. long.
Length of type (B. 7332) 135 mm.
This species is very closely allied to P. multiradiata, but
may be at once distinguished by its much smaller scales. It
has also a somewhat different number of rays in the dorsal
and anal fins, and the tail portion of the body is longer, while
a good recognition character lies in the black tips to the fins.
Three small specimens were taken by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ in
thirteen fathoms off Nobby’s Head, Newcastle, New South
Wales. A larger and somewhat better preserved example is
in the Australian Museum collection from Port Jackson, and
has been selected as the type.
PEMPHERIS KLUNZINGERI, nom. nov.
Pempheris miilleri, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien.,
Xxx O79, p. 1360, pl. vin (Mec smullert, Poey. 1860).
Both Macleay! and Waite? have suggested that this species
is identical with P. compressa, Shaw, but it appears to be
distinguished by its much more elongate form, somewhat
larger number of anal rays and smaller scales. I have
counted eight specimens of P. compressa and find the number
of fin-rays and scales to be as follows:—-D. vi./9-10, A. iii./
35-38, lateral line to the hypural, 62-64. Klunzinger gives for
the same in his species :—D. v./10, A. iii./39-40, lateral line
75. he different forms of the two species may be seen by
comparing Klunzinger’s figure with that of Stead of P. com-
pressa.4
The type came from King George’s Sound. It was not
obtained by the ‘‘Endeavour,’’ nor have I seen any specimens.
PEMPHERIS ELONGATA, Sp. nov.
(Plate iv., Fig. 1.)
De ive-Ven 10-82 Ami: 24-27) eel Ve tee S 5 Co 178
i. lat. 68-71; 1. tr. 8-9 + 18-20. Height 3:1 to 2°7 in the
length to the hypural. Profile slightly arched to the dorsal
fin, thence straight to the tail; lower profile considerably
more curved than the upper one. Caudal peduncle narrow,
ied inthe eye:
1 daciode Pree Linn. soe. N.S. ae ee 1884, p. ‘a.
2 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899,
3 Shaw in White—Voy. N.S. Wales, fan a4 267, fig. 2a
4 Stead—Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 49, pl. xviii.
48 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Head 2°8 to 311 in the length. Orbit 2°4 in the head, much
greater than the interorbital width which is rather more than
one-fourth of the head, convex, and one-third longer than the
snout. Operculum with two very weak spines which are
almost hidden by scales. With the exception of the snout and
lips the whole head is covered with small scales set in a fleshy
skin, beneath which are numerous muciferous canals with
small pores opening onto the surface. Teeth minute, in a
single row on the jaws and in very narrow bands or almost
single rows on the vomer and palatines.
Median portion of the scales of the body more or less pro-
duced and usually with several microscopic points which are
variable both in number and degree of development. There
are from sixty-eight to seventy-one scales along the lateral
line to the hypural and about ten more extend onto the base
of the caudal; they are enlarged, those of the anterior portion
being almost twice as broad as long, and have either truncate
or excavate spiny margins. Below the lateral line the scales
are arranged in oblique rows which descend backwards
towards the lower surface of the body.
The distance between the origin of the dorsal and the end of
the snout is usually somewhat less, sometimes rather more
than half that between it and the tip of the caudal. The first
spine may be either well developed, small or absent ; the others
increase regularly in height, the last being about two-thirds
the length of the first ray. The latter is simple and a little
longer than the space between the end of the snout to the
hinder orbital margin. The length of the base of the anal
is 1°5 to 1°7 that of the dorsal; its anterior rays are much
higher than the posterior ones, but are only two-thirds, or
less, the length of the first dorsal ray. The first spine is placed
either below the hindermost portion of the dorsal or entirely
behind that fin and is often minute and hidden in the scales.
Third upper ray of the pectoral the longest, reaching almost
to or a little beyond the vertical of the anal. Ventrals placed
below the pectorals and not reaching so far back as the vent.
Colour.—Upper surface of the head, back and upper portion
of the sides closely speckled with microscopic brown dots
' which give them a greyish colour. Breast, lower jaw and lips
more or less similarly dotted, and the specks also-extend onto
the dorsal and caudal rays. Otherwise colourless in preserved
examples.
Described from sixteen specimens go to 132 mm. long, the
longest of which is selected as the type.
This species is allied to P. unwini, Ogilby, but is at once
distinguished by its much less spiny and more numerous
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 49
scales. The dorsal and anal fins also have several more rays
each, but otherwise the two are very similar.
The specimens were trawled off Flinders Island, Bass
Strait, in 4o fathoms, and off Wilson’s Promontory, Victoria.
The following key will serve to distinguish the Australian
species of Pempheris :—
a. Anal fin with more than 30 rays; body rather deep.
b. Scales mostly cycloid, ctenoid anteriorly, deciduous.
c. Seales large, 46-50 on lateral line (to the hypural) :—
multivadiata.
cc. Seales smaller, 60-62 on the lateral line:— — affinis.
bb. Scales ctenoid, adherent.
d. 62-64 scales on the lateral line :— compressa.
dd. 75 scales on the lateral line :— klunzingert.
-aa. Anal fin with less than 30 rays, body rather elongate.
e. Edges of the scales with minute, irregular points,
though scarcely ctenoid :— elongata.
FaMILy SERRANIDZ..
GENUS EPINEPHELUS, Bloch.
EPINEPHELUS SEPTEMFASCIATUS, Thunberg.
Grey-banded Rock Cod.
Plectropoma susuki, Giinther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 100.
Epinephelus septemfasciatus, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat.
Fish., 1., 1895, p- 226; :d., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., tv.,
1899, p. 75; id., Jordan & Richardson, Proc. U.S. Nat.
Mus., XxXxXvii., 1910, p. 458.
Jordan and Richardson have recently expressed the opinion
that the Australian records of this species are probably in-
correct. I have compared the specimen taken by the
‘“Thetis,’? another of unknown origin, and two in the ‘‘En-
deavour’’ collection with the description given by these
authors of Japanese specimens, and find that they differ in
two small details only. None show the small patch of very
fine scales near the tip of the maxillary, nor in any is the sixth
band divided as described. Gunther stated, however, that the
colouration of his Port Jackson specimens was as in that
figured by Schlegel, so that, though I think it possible that
the Australian fish represents a distinct subspecies, it is best
to leave the matter open until examples from both localities
can be compared.
Two specimens trawled off the Clarence River, New South
‘Wales, in 26-30 fathoms.
50 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
GENUS HYPOPLECTRODES, Gill.
HYPOPLECTRODES SEMICINCTA, Cuvier and Valenciennes.
Half-banded Sea Perch.
Gilbertia semicincta, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd
diner OOK, Ps, 3075
A single specimen was preserved from six miles off Port
Stephens, New South Wales, 43 fathoms.
Genus Anrtuias, Bloch.
Anthias, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed., i., 1895,
paegZo:
A careful examination of fourteen specimens of A. pulchel-
lus, Waite, shows that the differences between this genus and
Cesioperca are very slight. Comparing the definitions of the
two, as given by Boulenger (loc. cit., pp. 311 and 320), it
appears that the only reliable differences between them are
as follows :—
Scales rough on the border, denticulated; tubes of the
lateral line bifurcate, short. Dorsal with 19-23 rays. Anal
with 9-10 rays :— Ce@sioperca..
Scales ciliated, smooth. ‘Tubes straight or with an ascend-
ing tubule and) extending along nearly the entire scales.
Dorsal with 14-18 rays. Anal with 6-8 rays :-— Anthias.
In A. pulchellus I find the number of fin rays agrees with
Anthias, while the characters of the scales are distinctly those:
of Cesioperca. In the fourteen specimens the number of fin-
rays and scales is as follows:—D. x./16-17; A. ui./8; P.
15-16; 1. lat. 41-45.
My colleague, Mr. E. F. Hallmann, very kindly pre-
pared microscopical mounts for me of the scales of Anthias
pleurotenia, Bleeker, A. pulchellus, Waite, C@sioperca rasor,
Rich., and C. lepidoplera, Forster. In the first-named only
are they smooth with ciliated edges. Those of the other
three have their borders roughened for varying distances
FIG. 12.
within the ciliated edges. In none do I find the tubes of the
lateral line bifurcate, as stated by Boulenger, though they
extend further across the scales in A. pleurotenia than in the:
others.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 51
It follows, therefore, that if A. pulchellus be admitted as a
true Anthias, the differences in the number of fin-rays alone
can be used to distinguish C@sioperca from that genus.
ANTHIAS PULCHELLUS, Waite.
(Fig. 12.)
Anthias pulchellus, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899,
Pi-7775) Dla xt
Of eleven specimens preserved only three bear the black
spot on the dorsal fin. They were obtained off Norah Head,
New South Wales, in 65 fathoms, and 60 miles south of Cape
Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms.
GENUS CALLANTHIAS, Lowe.
CALLANTHIAS ALLPORTI, Giinther.
Allport’s Perch.
Callanthias allporti, Giinther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4), xvil.,
1876, p. 390; id., Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd
Cdr in mroOs ep. 335) pl. xvid Waite, Prelam. Rept.
ppihetis; Exped’) 1898, p:331., pl:
Callanthias platei, Boulenger, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), iii,
1899, p- 346; id.. Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899,
p2co;td.. ibid. Rec: Austr. Mus.,w2; 1903, p. 56 (nec C.
platei, Steindachner).
Callanthias platei australis, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
Wales; xxiv... 1899,°p: 173.
In 1898 Waite (Prelim. Rept. ‘‘Thetis’’) recorded six speci-
mens from the New South Wales coast as C. allporti,
Gunther, but noted that they did not wholly agree with the
published descriptions of that species. Boulenger (Ann. Mag.
Nat. Hist.), with Gunther’s type before him, considered that
Waite’s figure represented a distinct species and identified it
with C. platei, Steindachner,! which had just been described
from Juan Fernandez. Later, Ogilby (Proc: Linn Soc.
N.S.W.), noting certain differences between Steindachner’s
figure and the Australian fish, proposed to separate the latter
under the varietal name australis, but this name was not
adopted by Waite, who referred to it simply as C. platet
(Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., and Rec. Austr. Mus., v.).
With twenty-three specimens taken by the ‘‘Endeavour’’
and four others in the museum collection before me, I find
that the ‘‘Thetis’’ specimens were correctly identified as C.
allporti, and that C. platei australis is merely the young form
1 pond ennen nana Chilensis, Zool. Jahrb., Suppl., iv., 2, 1898, p. 284,
plo xv:
52 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS
of that species. C. allporti varies greatly with age both in the
depth of the body and height of the vertical fins, so that
Waite’s figure represents the half-grown fish about 200 mm.
long, while that in the British Museum Catalogue is the figure
of an adult specimen.
Though closely approaching the figure of C. platei in its
younger stages, C. allporti nevertheless appears to be dis-
tinguished by its larger eye and higher vertical fins. The
other characters used by Ogilby to differentiate the variety
australis are dealt with below.
My series includes specimens from less than five inches to
others over eleven inches long, and they show that the body
is much more slender in young individuals than in adults.
The greatest depth in the smallest specimen is 3°21 in the
length from the snout to the hypural, and it regularly increases
with age until in the largest it is 2°66 in the same.
The height of the vertical fins also varies with age, as well
as individually. In the smallest specimen the longest anal
rays are 7°3 in the above length, while a large example has
them 5°04 in the same. In none are they so short as in the
figure of C. platei which shows them to be about 8°3 in that
length.
The length of the head varies from 3°88 (young) to 4°61
(adult) in the length from the snout to the hypural. In his
comparison of C. platei with C. p. australis, Ogilby’s figures
show the head to be much smaller in the first-named. My
specimens, however, and a comparison of Steindachner’s and
Waite’s illustrations show that this difference is not so great
as is indicated.
The eye of the young is larger than that of the adult, being
2°77 as against 3 in. the leagtajot ‘the. head=a@heveve oteC:
platei is proportionately smaller. The maxillary generally
extends to below the anterior margin of the pupil, but in one
specimen reaches almost to the middle of the eye. Ogilby’s
counting of the fins and scales agrees with mine.
Ogilby has erected the genus Anogramma for C. allporti
regarding the strength of the vomerine teeth to be of generic
importance. I have large specimens agreeing in every other
way with the figure of C. allporti in which these are either
small or absent, while others of the australis form have them
well developed. Anogramma is therefore unnecessary.
’
The ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection includes forty-three specimens,
most of which come from off Flinders Island, Bass Strait.
Six were preserved from eleven miles east of Rarrenjoey
Head, New South Wales, 40 fathoms.
: FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 53
GENUS C4:SIOPERCA, Castelnau.
C4ESIOPERCA RASOR, Richardson.
Red Perch.
Serranus rasor, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1839, p- 95,
and Trans. Zool: Soe:;\1i.; 1849; p2'73), pl: iv., fig. 1.
Anthias rasor, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i., 1859, p. 93;
td-> Macleay Proc. ‘Linn. ‘Soc NtS: Wales, v.; 1881,
Po oitwid.. johnston, -Broc. GRoys soc. Pasm:, 1882
(1883), p. Se ii. Lucas,’ Proc: ixoya soc: Vict., 2 ser.
-, 1890, p.
ee vasOYr, espinal Proc. Zooalksoc) Vict-, 1., 1872
p-. 49; 7d., Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed.,
1895, P- 313-
Anthias rasor var. extensus, Klunzinger, Arch. fur. Nat.,
WV is, O72, Pp. 17.
ais Lo SSEG, ee , sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien, Ixxx
, P- 339, pl. 1
epee: es Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd
Cdr pa LoO sos 213.
The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens show that the colour markings
of this species are subject to great variation. The black mark
on the side may be large or only moderately developed, or
altogether absent. One specimen shows a large black spot
on one side and none on the other, while in a second example
it covers fifteen scales on the left side and two on the right.
The blue bands around the eye and on the body are well
developed in some and wanting in others. Having counted
fifteen specimens I find the number of scales and fin-rays to
be as follows:—D. x.-x1./19-22; A. ui./g-10; P. 14-15; V.
Ser LS salvlat, 4o-s6.
In separating his Anthias extensus from A. rasor, Klunzinger
considered that it had a, more slender body, longer pectorals,
smooth preorbital, and lacked the characteristic markings of
Richardson’s species. The above notes prove that the latter
character has no specific value, while Boulenger shows that
the length of the pectorals does not differ in the two. Castel-
nau described the preorbital as strongly ciliated, but in all
my specimens it is either entire or somewhat crenulate, and
therefore agrees with both Klunzinger’s and Richardson’s
figures. I find that the depth of the body varies from 2°75 to
30 in the length to the hypural, so that but one character,
the smaller scales, is left to distinguish extensus. Klunzinger
counted 62-63 scales on the lateral line, but it seems that he
included some unperforated ones on the base of the tail, as
his figure, which is by that most accurate artist, Konopicky,
shows only 58.
54 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Having disposed of these apparent differences I have ne
hesitation in following Macleay! in uniting the two species.
The ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection includes fifteen specimens from
the following stations :—
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40
fathoms.
Oyster Bay, Tasmania.
Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms.
Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37
fathoms.
Five others are in the Australian Museum from Tasmania
and South Australia.
C4:SIOPERCA LEPIDOPTERA, Forster.
Bastard Longfin.
Cesioperca lepidoptera (Forster), Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat.
Bish endieds, 1.) 1805s pghe5 1d., Viale. brelim- swept.
Uhetisqebxpeds, 1SQS, payer. ple.
Though a large black spot on each side below the lateral
line is characteristic of this species, yet some specimens in the
collection show that it may occasionally be absent. Others
also are marked with many small greenish spots which some-
times form short, irregular lines, and may be so crowded on
the upper parts as to darken them considerably, while still
others show three yellow longitudinal bands along the sides
below the lateral line.
Twenty-two specimens were examined from the following
localities :—
Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40
fathoms.
Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37
fathoms.
GENUS ENnopLosus, Lacepede
ENOPLOSUS ARMATUS, Shaw.
Old Wife, Bastard Dorey, Zebra Fish.
Chetodon armatus, Shaw in White, Voy. N.S. Wales, 1790,
pe 54,ue. 1.
Specimens of this widely distributed species were preserved
from off the Clarence River, New South Wales, 26-30
fathoms, Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms,
and off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o
fathoms.
1 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884, p. 4.
FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. ate
Famity APOGONICHTHYIDZ.
Genus Apoconops, Ogilby.
‘lpogonops, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxi., 1896,
p- 23 (anomalus).
Ogilby’s definition of this genus requires amendment and
correction. Studying his type specimen I find that whereas
he saw no supplemental bone to the maxillary there is really
a very distinct bone lying along the upper and inner margin
of the maxillary. He writes, also, ‘‘vomer, palatines and
tongue edentulous ;’’ both the first-named bear very minute
teeth, and there are also some larger ones intermingled with
the others on the vomer. ‘The teeth on the jaws are as
described in the type, but in large examples they are as
described below. Instead of ‘‘a single dorsal fin, deeply
notched,’’ there are two dorsals separated by a short inter-
space.
No scales remain on any part of the body but the lateral
line in the type, but in one of the specimens taken by the
““Thetis’’ Expedition there are some on the upper portion of
the head, body and base of the tail. Ogilby has stated that
they are cycloid and concentrically striated. This applies to
the head scales only, they being distinctly ctenoid everywhere
else.
All these characters are much more easily detected in my
largest specimens, 122 mm. long, than in the type which is
only 54 mm. long, and, considering the care which Mr. Ogilby
usually lavished on his descriptions, the differences detected
are doubtless due to the want of sufficient microscopical
appliances on his part.
Apogonops is apparently closely allied to Synagrops, Gun-
ther, but is distinguished by having three instead of only two
anal spines.
APOGONOPS ANOMALUS, Ogilby.
(Figs)
Apogonops anomalus, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
RK LOO, "ps 24.510., Waite, Mem- Austr Mus... iv-,
T8995 p- 74, pl. xin, die. 1.
Disixe tao loan 7). 13 ee oor Gre dat.
46-50 to hypural. Head 22-34, depth 4;4, in the length to the
hypural. Eye 3-34 in the head, longer than the snout which is
3%. Interorbital space 44. Caudal peduncle 24-24, as long as
broad, its depth equal to the length of the eye.
Body elongate-oblong, tapering posteriorly, compressed.
Head large, some of the bones covered with membrane
enclosing canals beneath it. Mouth oblique, maxillary reach-
56 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFi:C RESULTS.
ing to or not so far as the middle of the eye, its posterior
border slightly emarginate ; supplemental bone distinct, lying
along the upper margin of the maxillary and turned in towards
its inner side. Preorbital entire. Preoperculum with two
borders, the inner entire; the outer serrated at and near the
angle which is a little produced; short ridges extend from
each tooth across the bone. Operculum with two spines, the
lower a little longer than the upper. Suprascapular rounded,
with a dentate margin, and a ridge on its lower portion
extending forwards. Nostrils situated on the hinder half of
the snout, almost equal in size, the anterior with a skinny
margin.
Teeth in villiform bands on the jaws, vomer and palatines,
with scarcely any larger ones in the young. In the adult the
premaxillaries bear crowded villiform teeth along their whole
length, and have a pair of large curved fangs near their
symphyses which may be double. Between these bones there
is a median excavation which is toothless. Mandible with a
narrow band of villiform teeth which is widest anteriorly. A
strong pair of canines, corresponding to but smaller than those
of the upper jaw, in front; on either side large curved teeth
occur among the others which increase in size as they extend
backwards, and terminate about half way along the length of
the jaw. ‘These larger teeth are variable in size and number
in different specimens. Vomer with two diverging bands of
minute teeth, among which are some larger ones. Palatines
each with a long, narrow band of minute villiform teeth. Gill-
rakers of first arch long and slender, the hinder ones more
than half as long as the eye and each with the inner margin
minutely denticulated ; 21-22 on the lower limb.
FIG, 13.
Scales very deciduous, those of the upper part of the head,
preorbital and mandible rounded, concentrically striated and
cycloid. They also appear to have been present on the cheeks
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 577
and operculum. On the body they are similarly rounded and
striated, but ctenoid; those of the lateral line have a deep
notch in their posterior margins. The scales extend onto the
fleshy bases of the dorsal and anal fins and onto the caudal.
Lateral line almost straight and extending onto the scaly base
of the caudal.
First dorsal fin originating over or a little behind the base
of the pectorals; the third and fourth spines are subequal,
2 or almost half as long as the head. The ninth spine is the
shortest and 1s separated from the second dorsal by an inter-
space a little longer than its own length. Spine of the second
dorsal slightly less than half as long as the rays, which are
about equal to the length of the longest spines. Anal com-
mencing below the third or fourth dorsal ray; the first spine
is short and stout, the second shorter than but usually much
stronger than the third which is but little shorter than the
rays. Ventrals placed below the anterior part of the base of
the pectoral and not nearly reaching to the vent; the spine is
about two thirds the length of the second ray which is the
longest. Pectorals very long, 2-2 as long as the head, the
upper ray rather longer than the others.
Colour.—Brownish or greyish above, lighter below; oper-
culum, thorax and abdomen silvery. A series of about five:
dark blotches along the sides which are less distinct or absent
in large specimens. Two darker patches on the scaly portion
of the tail. Upper portion of the dorsal fin with a blackish
patch between the second and fifth spines.
Described from two specimens, 54 and 122 mm. long, the
smaller one being the type of the species. Fin formula and
lateral line counted in nineteen specimens.
Forty-three specimens were preserved from the following
localities :—
Between Port Setphens and Newcastle, New South Wales,
22-60 fathoms.
Twenty-five miles south-west of Cape Everard) Victoria,
83-98 fathoms.
Thirty-six miles off Cape Everard, Victoria, 75 fathoms.
Famity AMBASSID.
Genus Priopis, Kuhl and Van Hasselt.
PRIOPIS RAMSAYI, Macleay,
(Plate xvi., fig. 3.)
Pseudoambassis ramsayi, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
Wales, v., 1881, p. 340.
Ambassis ramsayi, Ogilby, Cat. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1886,
jo hme
58 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Chanda ramsayi, Waite, Mem. N S. Wales Nat. Club, No. 2,
1904, Pp. 29.
Ambassis gymnocephalus, Ramsay and Ogilby, Proc. Linn.
Soc. N.S. Wales, i. (2), 1887, p. 1102. (Perhaps not A.
gymnocephalus (Lacépéde) Bleeker. )
Abasassis, sp., Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii. (2)
1889, p. 1559.
Chanda gymnocephalus, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club,
No? 2, 1904, p. 20.
Di wis-vile ro) Ay tigee@ar Te: ea Meier C58 Niro
sc. lat. 25-26; sc. tr. 3 + 7. Depth nearly 24, head 3i in the
length to the hypural. Eye 23-3, orbit 24 in the head, and
twice as long as the snout. Interorbital width 14 in the orbit.
Caudal peduncle 2 in the head.
Body rather deep, compressed. Upper anterior profile
interrupted over the eye, the back between the nape and the
dorsal more or less keeled. ‘Supraorbital ridge smooth
anteriorly, armed with three to five spines on its posterior
portion which is bent downwards. Antero-inferior orbital
ring crenulate or spinulate. Preorbital strongly denticulate.
Lower limbs of preoperculum denticulated, all the other bones
smooth. Maxillary reaching to below the anterior margin of
the eye. Two rows of scales on the cheeks, one behind the
eye; operculum with large irregular scales, a single row on
the interoperculum. Minute teeth on the jaws, vomer,
palatines and tongue. Gill-rakers flattened, spinulate on their
inner edges, the longest about half as long as the eye.
Scales of the body extending forwards to above the middle
of the eye and onto the bases of the dorsal, anal and caudal
fins. Lateral line interrupted below the spine of the second
dorsal or farther forward, each scale with its free margin
notched. There are ten to thirteen scales on the first portion
which is arched, and twelve to fourteen on the straight
portion.
Origin of the first dorsal a little nearer the end of the
second than the tip of the snout. The first spine short, the
second strong and subequal to the third and 1+ to rd in the
head; the last is joined to the second dorsal by membrane.
Spine of the second dorsal two-thirds as long as those of the
first, shorter than the anterior rays. Anal commencing and
terminating behind the second dorsal, its base either slightly
longer or shorter than that fin; the first spine short, the second
and third long and stout, the last as long as the rays but
shorter than the second dorsal spines. Pectorals almost
reaching the vertical of the first anal spines. Ventrals reach-
ing to or slightly beyond the vent which is placed well in
advance of the anal fin. Caudal deeply forked.
’
FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. ~
Se)
Colour.—Whitish, the scales of the upper portion of the
body margined with olive-green dots. A thin dark line on the
median line of the tail, and a silvery lateral band in specimens
in spirits. Upper portion of the head, lips and lower jaw
densely spotted with olive-green. Membrane between the
second and third dorsal spines blackish, and the tips of the
soft dorsal and anal are darker. Caudal more or less spotted,
its margin darker.
Described from two specimens, 80 and 88 mm. long,
recently collected in a prawn net at San Souci, Botany Bay,
by Mr. J. H. Wright, and presented by him to the Australian
Museum. ‘Two very imperfect specimens are in the ‘‘Endea-
vour’’ collection which were taken near Sydney.
I have examined the type of Pseudoambassis ramsayi in the
Macleay Museum. It is very shrivelled and has lost many of
its scales, but leaves no doubt that the specimens described
above are correctly identified. I have also examined the
specimens from the Parramatta River, identified by Ramsay
and Ogilby as 4. gymnoc ephalus, and find them to be identical
with Macleay’ s species, though whether they are really
gymnocephalus also 1 am unable to say. They appear, how-
ever, to have a much deeper body and less slender caudal
peduncle than that species.
Famiry SILLAGINIDAE.
References to the Australian species of this family are in an
extremely confused state. I have endeavoured to sort some
of them into the order I believe they should be, and furnish
a key which is drawn up principally from an examination of a
number of specimens of each species :—
a. Dorsal fins united, the first with 12-14 spines. Scales in
about 130 rows :— ISOSILLAGO.
b. D. xii.-xiv., 25-27; A. 24-25. Body with small dark
Spots. punctata.
aa. Dorsal fins separate, the first with ro-12 spines. Scales
in 65-75 rows :— SILLAGO.
Gap Etice ae dark mark at the base of the pectoral.
d. Caudal peduncle as broad as the postorbital portion
of the head.
é. Do xa.. 18; A. 17-18 elat. 63-65 :— ciliata.
dd. Caudal peduncle narrower than the postorbital por-
tion of the head.
Ae Xteoxll 9 2O-20ieteeed le, lab 70-70 3
maculata.
60 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS
cc. No black mark on the base of the pectoral.
g. Ventrals placed below the origin of the first
dorsal.
h. D. X1GaUereA® 2071: lat-.65):—-robusta:
Ventrals placed in advance of the origin of
the dorsal.
1. 1D. xed. 18-20,. As h20-22F leat
JT?
660-68:-— bassensis.
i: Dee 21-22. Ae i Qeone le ulate
69-74 :— bostockut.
ni. D. sxihe22-23.5 A. 24-25 1. lat. yo
sthama.
Neosillago marmorata, Castelnau,! having only five spines
in the first dorsal, is evidently not a member of this family,
but possibly belongs to the Nototheniide.
Having had the opportunity of examining the types of
Tsosillago maculata, Macleay,2 I find that the number of
spines and rays in the dorsal and anal fins are incorrectly
stated in the original description. There are thirteen spines
in the first dorsal and one spine and twenty-four or five rays
in the second; the anal has twenty-four spines and rays in
all. In these and all other characters they agree with Sillago
punctata, Cuv. & Val., but may very well form the type of a
distinct genus Jsosillago, characterised by the union of the
two dorsals, larger number of spines in the first, and by having
very small scales.
I am unable to find any specimens marked as the types of
Sillago gracilis, Alleyne and Macleay,> in the Macleay
Museum, but there are two small specimens labelled ‘‘Sillago
sp? Torres Straits,’’ which I have no doubt are the types.
Through the kindness of Professor Haswell and Professor
David, I have been allowed to borrow them for examination.
One is a little larger than the other, and from the snout to the
end of its broken tail is almost 82 mm. long, which is exactly the
length of the figure of S. gracilis. In other details also, such
as the form of the damaged tail and the pronounced shrinkage
marks on the head, it agrees perfectly with the figure, though
it has lost all trace of the colour markings with the exception
of the silvery lateral band. Both differ from the description in
the number of fin-rays in the dorsal and anal, there being
only one spine and twenty rays in each instead of one, twenty-
1 Castelnau—Res. Fish. Austr. (Vict. Rec. Philad. Exhib.), 1876, p. 16.
2 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1878, p. 34, pl. iv., fig. 3.
3 alley ne and Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i., 1877, p. 279, pl. vi.,
fig.
FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 61
two as stated. I regard this of little importance, however,
since Macleay also counted the same fins wrongly in his much
larger specimens of Isosillago maculata, as noted above.
If these two specimens be regarded as the types of S.
gracilis, that species must be sunk as a synonym of S. macu-
lata, Q. & G., as both the specimens and the figure agree well
with that species.
GENUS SILLAGO, Cuvier.
SILLAGO BASSENSIS, Cuvier and Valenciennes.
Bass Whiting, School Whiting.
Sillago bassensis, Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss.,
ili-y Lo29, -p..412+ 1d. Ogilby .ed™ Fish. N.S. Wales,
1893, pp- 99, 101, 102; id., Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv.,
[902 p. 190.20-— Stead, Proc) Bimn- Soe: ?NsS- Vales,
xx LOGO, 4p. 574, ands Ed). Bish) (N-S. Wales, 1908;
Pan0S5 u pl ex.
Sillago maculata, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1.,-1872,
p- 94; td., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883),
116: 71d... eucas. Proc, ‘Roy-ssoc-, Vict. (m. ser), i.
1890, p. 26 (after Castelnau); id., Waite, Mem. Austr.
Mus. 1V.2 1SO9..p. 109); (wee. Sa wnaculata, ©. & G.):
Sillago ciliata, Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883),
Pplco, tio (nec ’S.. ciliata, ‘Cuvues Vial>):
Many specimens of this common southern species were
preserved. I have counted the fin-rays and scales of forty
specimens from New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South
Australia and West Australia and find them to be as follows:
—D. x.-xi./18-20; A. 20-22; |. lat. 66-68.
The °‘Endeavour”’
stations :—
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait.
Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20
fathoms.
specimens were taken at the following
South-east of Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South
Australia, 37 fathoms.
SILLAGO MACULATA, Quoy and Gaimard.
Trumpeter Whiting.
Sillago maculata, Quoy & Gaimard, Voy. “‘Uranie,’’ 1824,
p- 261, pl. li., fig. 2; id., Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish.,
li., 1860, p. 245 (part.); id., Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak.
Wiss. Wien., liii., p. 444; td., Alleyne & Macleay, Proc.
Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i., 1877, p. 279; 1d., Castelnau,
,
62 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1879, pp. 380-381 ; id..,
Klunzinger, Sitzb., Ak. Wiss. Wien., Ixxx. i., p. 370;
id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881,
p- 566; 1d., Woods, Fish. N.S. Wales, 1882, p. 65, pl.
xxiil. ; id., Ogilby, Cat. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1886, p. 31;
id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, pp. 292, B37 Oe Mto
Ogilby» Ed. Fish) Nes) Wales, 1893) p-) 101, (pant):
id., Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 1902, pp. 190, 191;
id., Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904,
Dp» Quinta. stead, Ed aiish. INS. Wales: 1908, p. 64,
plo xxiv.
Sillago burrus, Richardson, Icones Piscium, 19435, P= (55) plain
fig. 1; 1d., Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ii.
LO7 Ow Oa 232r
Sillago gracilis, Alleyne & Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
Wales imc, ai877, D.27G,mplbavias) tie 2:
’
These are all the Australian references I know of which can
be definitely associated with this species. I have examined
specimens from the neighbourhood of Sydney, the Gulf. of
Carpentaria and Fremantle, West Australia.
SILLAGO CILIATA, Cuvier and Valenciennes.
Sand Whiting.
Sillago ciliata, Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., iii.,.
1620, p» 415, -0¢., Gunthepaporit. Muss Cat.” Kish: sais
1860, p. 245; id., Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien.,
liii., 1866, p. 443; 7d., Kner, Reise Novara, Fische, 1869,
p.127 00. all & Macleseroc. Linn. Soc. Nis Wales:
i., 1877, p. 279; 1d., Klunzinger, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien,
IxkxeeieerS79, p. 3693 "d=aViacleay, Proc Linn: (Soc
NESs Wales, ov.0 ‘1881 vose5e7.7d., Woods; Mish IN-S:
Wales 1882)op. 65,» plies. 542d., Ogilby, 6@at. Bish.
N.S. Wales, 1886, p. 31; 1d., McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict.,,
1889, pl. clxxxii.; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, pp.
2902 andi370, pl. xlv.,figaeema...Osilby.. Ed. Fish. NCS:
Wales, 1893, p. 102, pl. xxvii. ; 1d., Waite, Rec. Austr.
Mitisessivs, L901, *p..47 saidemevVaite,, Mem: N.S3 Wales:
Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, p. 31; 1d., Jordan & Seale, Bull.
US. Burs ish, xxviqm@osn(1900), (p. 277 5 10., stead:
Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 63, pl. xxxiil.
Sillago terre-regine, Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
i elOZO, pr 52.32:
Sillago bassensis, Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
ili., 1879, p. 381; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
Wales, v., 1881, p. 567; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef,
1893, p- 291; id., Tosh, Proc. Roy. Soc. Olds, xwit, 1903.
p. 175, pls. viii-xiv. (nec. S. bassensis, C. & V.).
FISHES.—McCULLOOR. 63:
This species occurs all along the eastern coast of Australia,
and has been recerded from Cape York to Port Phillip. A
specimen in the British Museum is said to be from Tasmania.
The specimens recorded by Castelnau from Fremantle dis-
trict, West Australia, as S. ciliata* are not that species. The
Australian Museum has recently received some fine examples
from the same locality, from Mr. A. Abjornssen, which differ
from S. ciliata in having smaller scales, a much narrower caudal
peduncle, more rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and in lacking
the characteristic dark mark at the base of the pectorals.
They are evidently identical with Castelnau’s specimens and
must, therefore, receive the alternative name, bostockii, which
he proposed in case they should prove distinct from the-
eastern species.
Famity SCIAANIDZ.
GENUS CyNOSCION, Gill.
CyYNOSCION ATELODUS, Giinther.
Teraglin.
Otolithus atelodus, Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893,
aye Wasp tidl eo.daile
Cynoscion atelodus, Stead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 67,
pl. xxxviil.
Three examples of this species, each about a foot long, were
taken fifteen miles off Saddle Hill, New South Wales, in 35
fathoms.
Famity GERRID/.
GENUS CHTHAMALOPTERYX, Ogziby.
CHTHAMALOPTERYX MELBOURNENSIS, Castelnau.
Gerres melbournensis, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1.,.
1872, p: 159, andiil., 1873, Pp. 37.
Chthamalopteryx melbournensis, Ogilby, Proc. Zool. Soc.
1887, p. 616, fig.
The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection includes many specimens of
this species which were taken at the following stations :—
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o
fathoms.
Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia,, 20
fathoms. f
Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms.
Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms.
South-east of Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South
Australia, 37 fathoms.
1 Castelnau—Proe. Zool. Soc. Vict., ii., 1873, p. 133.
“64 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Famity CHEILODACTYLIDA.
GENUS GonustTius, Gill.
GONIISTIUS VIZONARIUS, Kent.
Magpie Perch.
(Plate xi.)
Cheilodactylus gibbosus, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict.,
i., 1872, p. 75; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy Socy lasm.
1882 (1883), p. 112; id., Lucas, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict.,
(n. ser.), il., 1890, p. 21 (after Castelnau) (necriG.
gibbosus, Richardson).
Chilodactylus visonarius, Kent, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1887,
pp. XxXx., xxxi. and 48; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soe.
Tasm., 1890 (1891), p. 31
~Chilodactylus bizonarius, Kent, Naturalist in Austr., 1897,
pp. 165, 166, pl. xxvili., fig. 13.
DVillow25-205° A. ii Tos) bee See 6m Ve eer Oe
I. lat. 65-68.
Height of the body 2°6 to 2°8, length of the head 3°50 to
3°66 in the length to the hy pural Snout much longer than the
hnee: of the eye which is 4°2 to 4°8 in the head. Nostrils
large, close together, the anterior with two skinny lobes.
Mouth rather small, the maxillary reaching to below the
postertor nostril. A band of villiform teeth in each jaw;
vomer, palatines and tongue toothless. There is a large
conical projection in front of each eye, extending slightly
outwards and upwards.
15;
First dorsal originating a little behind the vertical of the
preoperculum, the fifth spine generally the longest, and either
equal to the distance from the snout to the preoperculum or
considerably shorter. Anterior rays subequal in length,
eradually decreasing backwards, the longest somewhat longer
than the snout. Thee anal spine longer than the second;
the second ray the longest and equal to the length from the
snout to the preoperculum. The simple rays of the pectoral
are very variable in their relative lengths; the second is
always the longest and reaches either to the origin or middle
of the anal fin. Ventral spine slender, generally equal to the
fourth dorsal spine in length; the first ray reaches to, or
almost to the vent. Caudal deeply forked.
Scales large anteriorly, becoming smaller behind. They
form a sheath to the bases of the dorsal and anal fins. On
the head they are very small and extend forwards to the
-anterior margin of the eyes above and to the maxillary below,
leaving the snout bare. They are very small on the breast
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 6 =
also, and on a narrow band which extends backwards to the
ventrals. Lateral line feebly arched, its course directed to the
upper part of the caudal peduncle, whence it extends onto the
base.of the tail.
Colour.—Silvery, the scales with or without darker
margins. A broad black band occupies the space between the
fifth and thirteenth dorsal spines and extends to the ventrals,
narrowing considerably as it approaches them. ) bona ee wa: |i Mat. 25=26,:
tr. 24-8.
Height of body 3-34, length of head 34-34 in the length to
the hypural. Eye 44-5, snout 3-34, caudal peduncle 24-24 in
the head. Interorbital width #-1 in the orbit.
Body compressed, highest at the origin of the dorsal, the
profile from the snout slightly convex or almost straight.
Head conical, the snout somewhat pointed. Caudal peduncle
very broad and flattened. Mouth slightly oblique, extending
to below the nostrils. Anterior canines strong and curved,
decreasing in size backwards; a second row of small teeth on
the anterior portion of each jaw. Posterior canine strong and
curved. Interorbital space convex over the eyes, flattened or
slightly concave on the median line. Upper portion of the
head, snout and space around the eyes, and the margin of the
preoperculum covered with muciferous canals. Cheeks with
four rows of small scales ; operculum with four or five rows of
large irregular scales. A broad skinny flap on the end of the
operculum..
Lateral line following the curve of the back to below the last
two dorsal rays, where it bends abruptly downwards to the
mid-line of the tail. Scales extending over the base of the
caudal fin, and series of smaller scales are continued up
between the rays.
78 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Dorsal spines increasing in length backwards, the last once
and a half to twice as long as the first and about as long as
the snout; the filament of each spine is produced beyond its
point. Rays of the dorsal longer than the spines, the second
or third last the longest and 2-24 in the head. Anal similar
to the dorsal. Second and third upper pectoral rays the
longest; the upper portion of the hinder margin is either
straight or slightly concave, while the lower angle is broadly
rounded. Ventrals rather small and pointed, not reaching
backwards to the vent. Hinder margin of the caudal truncate
the upper lobe, and usually the lower one also, produced.
FIG. 19.
Colour.—Pink, with a large yellow spot in the centre of
each scale on the sides. The head and back are darker, and
there is a light green spot on the operculum. A black spot
on the back at the base of the last dorsal rays may be present
or absent, and may be followed by a second less distinct one
on the free portion of the tail. After long preservation, the
colour is almost uniformly whitish with only faint indications
of longitudinal yellow bands along the rows of scales below
the lateral line. There are very indistinct traces of light spots
on the dorsal and anal fins which also appear to have had
slightly darker margins with lighter inframarginal bands.
Described from eight specimens, 148-215 mm. long.
There are also three specimens in the Australian Museum
which were received from the Tasmanian Museum as
Labrichthys mortoni, Johnston, with the description of which
they agree very well. They were afterwards identified by
Ogilby as Pseudolabrus psittaculus, and they are certainly
identical with the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens which I determine
as that species.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 79
A specimen in the Macleay Museum ts labelled ** Labrichthys
vubicunda, Macleay, Tasmania,’’ which, notwithstanding that
that species was said to come from King George’s Sound, I
have no doubt is the type. It agrees with the description in
every detail, even in the colours of the scales and in having
two dark spots on the back, the second being indistinct and
situated on the free portion of the tail. Its length, however,
is only 82 inches, or 813 to the extreme tip of the upper
caudal lobe, not 9 as stated. It 1s undoubtedly identical with
the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens, and I would therefore regard
Tasmania as the correct locality of the specimen.
The eight ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens were taken at the
following stations :—
Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o
fathoms.
Twenty miles north-east of Babel Island, Bass Strait, 68
fathoms.
Famity CARANGID..
GENus TRACHURUS, Rafinesque.
TRACHURUS DECLIVIS, Jenyns.
Yellowtail, Horse Mackerel.
Caranx declivis, Jenyns, Zool. Beagle, iii., 1842, p. 68,
Die exv:
Two large specimens sixteen inches long were obtained off
the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, in 20
fathoms, and another nearly eighteen inches long from the
Victorian coast. Two small ones are in the collection from
between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales,
22-60 fathoms.
Adult examples of this species have the last rays of the
dorsal and anal fins much enlarged and forming a semi
detached finlet, thereby approaching Decapterus. This con-
dition can also be traced in young examples, but it is much
less striking than in the larger ones.
GENUS CaRANx, Lacépede.
CARANX PLATESSA, Cuvier and Valenciennes.
Trevally.
Caranx platessa, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss.,
1x., 1833, p. 84; id., Jordan and Seale, Bull. U.S. Bur.
Fish., XXv., 1905 (1906), p. 437.
Caranx georgianus, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat.
BOIS ix. LO3S. Da G5.
. Many young specimens were obtained off the east coast of
Flinders Island, Bass Strait.
So “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Famity SCOMBRIDEE.
GENUS SCOMBER, Linn@us.
SCOMBER JAPONICUS, Houttuyn.
Mackerel.
Scomber japonicus (Houttuyn), Jordan and Evermann, Bull.
WS) bash. (Comm. scxtit« pt. ©. 1903) (1605) jas utGor
fig. 62.
Eighteen young examples, four and a half inches long,
were preserved from sixteen miles off Port Stephens, New
South Wales. The trawl was shot in 75 fathoms, but the
mackerel doubtless entered it as it neared the surface.
FamMity TRICHIURIDA.
GENUS THYRSITES, Cuvier.
THYRSITES ATUN, Euphrasen.
Barracouta.
Scomber atun, Euphrasen, Vetensk. Acad. Nya. Handl., xii.,
HGS) eyes) SHS
Several young examples were preserved from off Flinders
Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms,
and from forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30
fathoms. The species does not appear to have been previously
recorded from this State.
Famity BRAMID.
GENUS SCHUETTEA, Steindachner.
Schuettea, Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien., liii. i.,
1866, p. 449 (S. scalaripinnis).
Bramichthys, Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1905, p. 72 (B-
woodwardi).
The genus Schuetta, with scalaripinnis for its type, was
described by Steindachner in 1866 from four small specimens
taken in Port Jackson, but does not appear to have been again
noted by later writers. The Australian Museum collection
includes both young and adult examples which agree perfectly
with the definition. In 1905 Waite described a new genus
and species, Bramichthys woodwardi, from Western Aus-
tralia, but a comparison of specimens of that species, recently
received from Mr. A. Abjornssen, with others of S. scalari-
pinnis shows that they are undoubtedly congeneric.
The two species may be readily distinguished by the differ-
ent form of their bodies :—
a. Depth at the origin of the dorsal less than half the length
to the hypural :— scalaripinnis.
aa. The same depth more than half the same length :—
woodwardt-.
FISHES.—McCULLOCH. S1
SCHUETTEA SCALARIPINNIS, Steindachner.
(Plate xv.)
Schuettea scalaripinnis, Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss.
WWhiensgeliin eyites TSoOO. 2 pl. /449; Tole mele, tes aT 4d...
McCulloch, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxxvi., 1911,
p- 82.
Bramichthys woodwardi, Stead, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales,
MEK LOOO, ps 400 q0d., stead, Add shish. Haun. N.S.
Wales (Dept. Fish. N.S.W.), 1907, p. 23 (nec B. wood-
wardi, Waite).
Diver 28-205. eeiit.2 8-336 IP tO: Neaimegs © patty dat:
53-50; |. tr. 8+ 28.
Height of the body about 24, length of the head, 34-34 in
the length to the hypural. Eye very large, about 24, caudal
peduncle 22 to 3 in the head. Interorbital width 2, snout
rather more than 4 of the eye.
Body broadly ovate, compressed, the dorsal and ventral
profiles almost evenly rounded. Back between the eyes and
the dorsal fin with a well-developed keel in young specimens
which is less marked in adults. Interorbital space more or
less convex, snout flattened above, a slight concavity usually
present over the nostrils. Maxillary reaching to below the
anterior third of the eye; the distal end expanded, its breadth
only a little less than the length of the snout, and either
truncate or with the angles rounded. Preorbital narrow,
smooth. Angle of the preoperculum broadly rounded, the
inferior border minutely serrated in the young, almost or
quite smooth in adults, the hinder border very thin. Oper-
culum with two weak, flat spines separated by a broad, deeply
concave interspace; above the superior one the bony margin
forms three small points which are not always distinct. With
the exception of the tip of the snout and the lips, the whole
head is covered with small scales which extend backwards to
the dorsal fin and form a marked line on the sides of the nape
where they meet those of the body. Teeth minute, movable,
in bands on both jaws but absent near the symphyses of each ;
they form a triangular patch on the vomer and a band on each
palatine. Gill-rakers long, compressed, the longest about
half as long as the eye, and roughened on their inner surfaces ;
there are about twenty-six on the lower limb of the first arch.
A large pore is present on either side of the symphyses of
the lower jaw.
Scales of moderate size, very thin, cycloid and finely
striated. They are arranged in oblique rows on the sides
and are largest above the pectoral fin; they cover the greater
82 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
portion of the dorsal and anal fins, especially anteriorly, and
also extend onto the caudal and basal portion of the pectorals.
Lateral line more or less arched anteriorly, thence straight to
the hypural and continued to between the tips of the middle
caudal rays. .
Origin of the dorsal over the interspace between the ven-
trals and the anal, and about twice as far from the end of the
middle caudal rays as from the snout. The spines increase
regularly in height and are closely adpressed to one another.
The second and third rays are the longest and are from two-
thirds to three-quarters as long as the head; the next three
or four rays become rapidly shorter, and the following
decrease regularly to the last. Anal originating below the
second or third dorsal rays and terminating well behind that
fin; its base is a little shorter than, but the rays are of similar
form and length to those of the dorsal. Pectoral pointed, the
third upper ray the longest and reaching backward to above
the anal spines or even as far as the third ray of that fin.
Ventrals short, reaching to or a little beyond the vent.
Caudal forked.
Colour.—Silvery, tinged with pink, the upper parts of the
head and back darker. Most of the scales dark edged, par-
ticularly at the bases of the dorsal, anal and pectoral fins.
Tips of the dorsal and anal black. Caudal dusky, especially
at the tips of the lobes, the outermost rays darker. Specimens
long preserved in spirits are colourless, with the lower half
of the body silvery.
Described from four specimens 100-190 mm. jong, from
Port Jackson and its vicinity. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection
includes two specimens from near Sydney, while nine others
were presented to the Australian Museum by Mr. J. Blair,
who caught them in a meshing net at Bondi, near Sydney.
Famity ZEID/E.
GENUS ZeEuS, Linneus.
ZEUS FABER, Linn@us.
John Dorey.
Zeus faber, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i1., 1860, p. 393;
id., Day, Fish. Gt. Brit. and Ireland, i., 1880-4,.p. 138, pl.
xviii. ; id., Klunzinger, Sitz. Ak. Wiss. Wien, Ixxx. 1.,
1879, p. 370; id., Wamwe Rec. Cantho Muss wis gaz,
p25, and loc: cit.) 19kipep- 13S.
Zeus australis, Richardson, Zool. Ereb. and Terr., Fishes,
1845, p. 36, pl. xxv., fig. 1; id., Castelnau, Proc. Zool.
Soc! ‘Vict., 1., 1872.ep. 08's id.," Waite, Mem. Aust:
Mus., iv., 1899, p. 89.
FISHES.—McOULLOOH. 83
Having compared fifteen specimens from New South Wales
with the descriptions and figures of the European species, I
fail to find any specific differences between them. As has been
pointed out by Waite, the characters relied upon to dis-
tinguish Z. australis from Z. faber are variable, and one must
therefore follow Gunther in regarding the two as identical.
Eight small specimens, 63-140 mm. long, differ from the
larger ones in having much deeper bodies, which are marked
with many wavy, dark lines extending from the snout to the
tail.
This species was taken between Port Stephens and New-
castle, New South Wales, in 22-60 fathoms; in Disaster Bay,
New South Wales; and thirty-six miles off Cape Everard,
Victoria, 75 fathoms.
GENUS ZENOoPSIS, Gill.
ZENOPSIS NEBULOSA, Schlegel.
Mirror Dorey.
(Biate txvie: fig 4ir3)
Zeus nebulosus, Schlegel, Fauna Japonica, Poiss., 1847,
Poawi2a, pl. bevie
Zenopsis nebulosa, Jordan and Fowler, Proc. U.S. Nat.
MISS xXKVe,, FOO2.p. (515.
DD Tavaiteatwn 2 -DSe WAG A. , (25527 Vitin 59) Ps ere=14" C,
Ber 2k
Height of the body 1°6 to 1°8, length of the head 2°8 in the
length from the snout to the hypural. Snout twice as long as
the eye which is 4°3 in the head and a little wider than the
interorbital space. Maxillary very large, its greatest width
075 to 0°85 in the eye. With the exception of the rough
orbital margins, the head is quite smooth, though the pre-
operculum ends in a broad spine below, and there is another
more or less distinct flattened spine just below the end of the
maxilla. Teeth small, conical, acute, arranged in two groups
in front on the upper jaw, becoming rudimentary on the sides ;
in the lower jaw, though they are largest anteriorly, they are
also quite distinct laterally. They form two groups on the
vomer.
Skin wholly naked except for the bony bucklers which are
each armed with a central spine, curved backwards and out-
wards, and ornamented with radiating ridges. There are
twelve to fourteen bucklers along the base of the dorsal, the
anterior ones being somewhat indistinct and commencing in
advance of the third dorsal spine ; those beneath the middle of
84 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
the soft dorsal are the largest. Eight or nine are arranged.
along the base of the anal. There are two or three median
plates and two to four pairs in front of the ventrals, while
between that fin and the anal there is one median and six to
eight of the paired series. Generally the bucklers of one side
do not correspond to those of the other but are more or less
alternate to one another. Lateral line strongly arched
anteriorly, straight posteriorly.
Dorsal originating over the middle of the operculum. ‘The
second spine is usually the longest, and is either almost
equal to the length of the head or somewhat shorter. The
membrane of the spines is produced beyond their tips, the
filament of the anterior ones being from one-fourth to one-half
as long as the spine. ‘The rays are all simple, and increase
rapidly in length to about the fourteenth, which is more than
twice as long as the first; behind this they are more uniform.
Anal spines decreasing in length backwards, the first equal
to about three-fourths the length of the eye; the rays are
similar in form to those of the dorsal. Ventrals large, reach-
ing to the first anal spine in old specimens and to the first ray
in younger ones; the first ray not closely adpressed to the
spine. Upper pectoral rays the longest, once and a half to
twice as long as the eye. Caudal truncate or slightly rounded
when expanded, its peduncle about two-thirds the diameter of
the eye.
Colour.—Silvery, the first dorsal, ventral and hinder portion
of the caudal blackish. A large dark spot on the middle of
the sides in fresh specimens, which disappears in preserved
examples.
The above description is drawn up from thirteen specimens
230-360 mm. long. In large examples the profile from the
chin to the vent is evenly rounded, but in the smaller ones it
descends obliquely to the ventrals, where it forms a sharp
angle with the belly line. The latter is either straight or
convex. The specimen figured on plate xvi. is 242 mm. long,
and represents the angular stage, while the rather crude
figure in ‘‘Fauna Japonica’’ shows the rounded profile char-
acteristic of the larger fish.
Relying on the descriptions and figure quoted above, and.
with only the smaller specimens before me, I at first con-
sidered the Australian examples distinct from Z. nebulosus,
as none showed the clouded body markings of Schlegel’s
figure, nor has the angular form been described in the
Japanese works. Having since obtained a specimen from
Tokio Bay, however, and larger ones from the Victorian
coast, I find that they agree in every detail.
FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 85
The thirteen specimens were trawled at the following
stations :—
Off Cape Everard, Victoria, 70 fathoms.
Twenty miles north-east of Babel Island, Bass Strait, 68
fathoms.
Disaster Bay, New South Wales, 45 fathoms.
The genus Zenopsis is commonly regarded as pelagic, but
this is obviously incorrect, though it would seem that some of
the species pass through their earlier stages near the surface.
GENUS CytTTUus, Giinther.
CYTTUS NOV 4#-ZELANDIA, Arthur.
(Plate vii., fig. 2, and fig. 20.)
Zeus nove-zelandie, Arthur, Trans. N.Z. Inst., xvi., 1885,
Pets pl. xiv. hie: 3°
Cyttus nove-selandia, McCulloch, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.
NWiales ex xxv tQtO, p. 307" 10... Waite, Rec. -Canth:
Mitts), :1- TO1r. ps 190, pli xxx:
Devitieeso eke ie 20,5b atl Santon. Tard Nat. Sars lta.
9+ 47.
Height 1°62 to 1°68 in the length from the premaxillary
when the mouth is closed to the hypural. Head almost 3 in
the same. Eye very large, 2°4 in the head and longer than
the snout. Interorbital width at its narrowest point 1°4 in
the eye. Orbit defined above by a curved ridge which is
armed with microscopic denticulations and forms an angle
at either end with the rest of the orbital margin. Another
curved ridge, perforated with numerous pores, extends from
the origin of the lateral line to the anterior end of a triangular
FIG. 20.
depression above the occiput, which receives the posterior
processes of the premaxillaries. All the other bones of the
head are very thin and have their edges smooth. When the
mouth is closed, the hinder margin of the maxillary is slightly
86 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
in advance of the anterior margin of the eye. The teeth are
extremely small in both jaws, conical and arranged in several
rows anteriorly. They are also present on the vomer, but the
palatines and tongue are smooth.
The scales are of somewhat peculiar construction, consist-
ing of two distinct parts separated by a constriction at either
end.
The anterior portion is finely striated vertically, and lies
flat upon the body. The posterior half is trilobed, and bears
only five or six crenulated lines; it rises abruptly from the
other portion and curls over upon the following scale, so that
closed channels are formed beneath each transverse row. At
the bases of the dorsal and anal fins the scales are slightly
enlarged and rounded and armed with rows of denticulations.
From the throat to the ventral fins there are two rows of
angular scales defining a flattened ventral surface on
which all the scales have denticulated edges. Behind the
ventrals there is a deep groove, into which the fin can be
folded, but its edges are not provided with specially modified
scales. The lateral line is strongly arched anteriorly. A
large triangular patch of scales covers the cheek, but the
rest of the head is bare. The vent is situated somewhat in
advance of the middle of the ventral groove.
The first dorsal fin commences vertically over a point mid-
way between the ventral and anal fins. The first spine is very
short, the second, third and fourth are subequal and slightly
longer than the eye. The rays of the second dorsal increase
regularly in length to a point behind the middle of the fin,
where they are a little shorter than the longest spine; thence
they decrease evenly backwards. First anal spine very stout
and almost immovable and longer than the second, which is
minute. The rays similar in form to those of the dorsal.
Ventral spine strong, the longest rays not reaching to the anal
spine. Pectorals rounded, the third ray longer than the eye.
Caudal slightly emarginate, the outer rays almost twice as
long as the eye.
Colour.—Silvery. First dorsal, ventrals and end of caudal
black. Iris golden.
A very young specimen 39 mm. long differs only in having
a deeper and more angular body, the depth being 1°3 in the
length to the hypural. It is marked with large scattered
darker blotches, the most conspicuous of which are two at the
base of the anal fin.
Compared with specimens of C. australis of the same size,
this species is at once distinguished by its much larger eye
and its short dorsal and ventral fins. In C. australis these are
FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 87
very elongate as in the adult. The lateral line is also more
arched, so that there are fewer scales between it and the first
dorsal (nine) than in C. australis (fifteen). Finally, the scales
of the last-named are armed on their outer surface and edges
with minute spines, whereas in this species the edges are
smooth and the surface bears only crenulated ridges.
The specimens described above differ from Arthur’s descrip-
tion in lacking the small roughened scales between the dorsal
fin and the interorbital space and in having only 83 scales
along the lateral line instead of 114. Mr. Waite, however,
has kindly compared some that I have sent him with other
New Zealand examples which he identifies as C. nove-
zelandi@, and has further forwarded me a half-grown example
for examination. ‘This last is undoubtedly identical with my
specimens, the largest of which is 135 mm. long, and we are
agreed that they are really Arthur’s species.
The collection includes fifty-six examples from the following
localities :—
Twenty-five miles south-west from Cape Everard, Victoria,
83-98 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40-70
fathoms.
Oyster and Storm Bays, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
CYTTUS AUSTRALIS, Richardson.
Silver Dorey.
Capros australis, Richardson, Trans. Zool. Soc., iii., 1849,
pee aud Zool, Erebp. and Terr pyrg7, pl! lix,, fics:
1-5.
Very young specimens of this species differ from the adults
in having a much shorter and deeper body and larger eyes. In
an example 75 mm. long the greatest height is 14 in the length
to the hypural, and the eye is 2? in the head. The largest
specimen obtained is 380 mm. long.
It was taken at the following stations :—
Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales,
22-60 fathoms.
Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms.
Thirty-six miles off Cape Everard, Victoria, 75 fathoms.
Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 7o
fathoms.
Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms.
>)
u&
N
Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia,
fathoms.
ing eae Sin ‘- > is
_ oe 7
,
2
.
s ’
Prehrs.
L
- :
hd '
;
!
.
i
-:
——— eh ee
. ’
ad etait
ant
Po Ya
oie
i
1]. Report on the Mollusca obtained by the F.I.S. ‘‘Endea-
vour,”’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia.
PARAS Ic
BY
CHARLES HEDLEY,
ASSISTANT CURATOR AND CONCHOLOGIST,
Australian Museum,
Sydney.
(Plates XvII.-xx.)
go “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
WLR IROIRAP COUN! TENE MI OILILIUSCAY.
ARSnele
1.— INTRODUCTION.
Through the kindness of the Hon. the Minister for Trade
and Customs, the writer, in August and September, 19009,
enjoyed an opportunity of accompanying the Director of
Fisheries on a cruise of the Fishery Investigation Ship,
‘“Endeavour.’’ The voyage extended from Melbourne to the
Nuyts Archipelago, South Australia. At every opportunity
Mr. Dannevig gave me facilities for using my dredge. By
this means a large number of Invertebrates, not procurable
by the trawl, were obtained. The largest collection was made
on August 28th at a depth of 95-100 fathoms, south of Cape
Wiles, South Australia, the precise position being thirty-
nine and a half miles S. 43 E. from Liguanea Island,
itself about four miles from Cape Wiles. eres three
full loads of the bucket dredge were lifted and _ sieved.
The bottom temperature here was not noted, but at 80
fathoms, a short distance away, it was 14'0 Cent. (=57°2
Fahr.), and the surface at midnight was 12°75 Cent. (=52
Fahr.). It was in this neighbourhood that in January,
1905, Dr. J. C. Verco, from the s.s. ‘‘Lady Diana,’’ made a
successful haul thirty-five miles south-west of the Neptune
Islands in to4 fathoms, and whence he has recorded so many
new species.
Including fragments, illegible or undetermined forms, the
Cape Wiles haul contained more than three hundred and fifty
species, of which I record two hundred and twenty-six. This
agrees with my experience in New South Wales and Tas-
mania,! indicating that the molluscan fauna of a yard or two
of the margin of the Australian Continental Shelf consists of
from two hundred and fifty to three hundred and fifty species.
This is richer than usual. Based chiefly on American
experiences, Dr. W. H. Dall? estimates that about four
hundred species would constitute an entire fauna of shell-
bearing molluscs from an ordinary region between the limits
of 40-60 degrees Fahrenheit.
1 Hedley—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1907, p. 273; Op. cit, vii., 1908, p. 109.
2 Dall & Harris—Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, No. 84, 1892, p. 26.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. gl
The species identified from the Cape Wiles station are as
follows :—
Nucula beachportensis, Verco.
Nucula obliqua, Lamarck.
Pronucula decorosa, Hedley.
Leda miliacea, Hedley.
Poroleda ensicula, Angas.
Limopsis erectus, Hedley ¢> Petterd.
Limopsis eucosmos, lerco.
Limopsis tenisoni, Tenison Woods.
Limopsis tenisoni, var. penelevis, Verco.
Cyrilla concentrica, Verco.
Pleurodon maorianus, Hedley
Arca pistachia, Lamarck.
Bathyarca perversidens, Hedley.
Glycymeris pectinoides, Lamarck.
Glycymeris tenuicostatus, Reeve
Philobrya fimbriata, Tate.
Philobrya pectinata, Hedley.
Trigonia margaritacea, Lamarck.
Chlamys antiaustralis, Tate.
Cyclopecten favus, Hedley.
Lima bassi, Tenison Woods.
Lima bullata, Born.
Limea austrina, J ate.
Limea murrayi, Smith.
Limea parvula, Verco.
Modiola linea, Hedley.
Modiolaria barbata, Reeve.
Arcoperna scapha, Verco.
Pholadomya arenosa, Hedley.
Myodora albida, Tenison Woods.
Verticordia ericia, Hedley.
Verticordia setosa, Hedley.
Ectorisma granulata, Tate.
Cuspidaria alta, Verco.
Crassatellites probleema, Verco.
Crassatellites producta, Verco.
Cuna atkinsoni, Tenison Woods.
Cuna comma, Verco.
Cuna concentrica, Hedley.
Cuna delta, Tate & May.
Cuna hamata, Hedley ¢ May.
Cuna obliquissima, Tate.
Venericardia amabilis, Deshayes.
Venericardia bimaculata, Deshayes.
Venericardia delicata, Verco.
“ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Venericardia dilecta, Smith, var. excelsior, Verco.
Venericardia rosulenta, Tate.
Mytilicardia calyculata, Linne.
Condylocardia compressa, Hedley ¢ May.
Cyamiomactra mactroides, Tate ¢~ May.
Myrtaea bractea, Hedley.
Divaricella cumingii, Adams ¢ Angus.
Corbis percostata, Hedley.
Thyasira flexuosa, Montagu.
Turquetia integra, Hedley.
Coriarius semiradiatus, Tute.
Cardium pulchellum, Gray.
Gafrarium angasi, Smith.
Chione mesodesma, Quoy ¢~ Gaimard.
Chione striatissima, Sowerby.
Tellina subdiluta, Tate.
Soletellina hedleyi, Sowerby.
Mactra jacksoniensis, Smith.
Saxicava arctica, Linne.
Acanthochites crocodilus, Torr € Ashby.
Schismope atkinsoni, Tenison JVoods.
Schismope pulchra, Petterd.
Scissurella australis, Hedley.
Emarginula superba, Hedley ¢> Petterd.
Lucapinella nigrita, Sowerby.
Megatebennus concatenatus, Crosse ¢ Fischer.
Puncturella fumarium, Hedley.
Puncturella demissa, Hedley.
Gibbula ocellina, Hedley.
Monilea oleacea, Hedley ¢> Petterd.
Monilea philippensis, Hutson.
Calliostoma allporti, Tenison Woods.
Calliostoma columnarium, Hedley ¢> May.
Calliostoma legrandi, Tenison Woods.
Calliostoma meyeri, Philippi.
Calliostoma retiarium, Hedley > May.
Danilia telebathia, Hedley.
Eucheius tasmanicus, Tenison Woods.
Leptothyra fugitiva, Hedley.
Leptothyra rosea, Tenison Woods.
Cirsonella weldu, Tenison IWoods.
Cyclostrema denselaminatum, I’erco.
Cyclostrema homalon, Jlerco.
Cyclostrema jaffaensis, !erco.
Liotia annulata, Tenison |]Voods.
Liotia denselineata, Tate.
Licta incerta, Tenison Woods.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY.
Phenacolepas calva, Verco.
Cocculina tasmanica, Pilsbry.
Nacella crebristriata, Verco. A
Helcioniscus ilabratus, Verco.
Rissoa hulliana, Tate, var. eucraspeda, Hedley.
Rissoa incompleta, Hedley.
Rissoa lockyeri, Hedley.
Rissoa verconiana, Hedley.
Amphithalamus costatus, Hedley.
Amphithalamus pyramidatus, Hedley.
Epigrus ischnus, Tate.
Rissoina gertrudis, Tenison Woods.
Rissoina rhyllensis, Gatliff G- Gabriel.
Rissoina tasmanica, Tenison Woods.
Cithna angulata, Hedley.
Calyptraea calyptraeformis, Lamarck.
Capulus devotus, Hedley.
Mathilda decorata, Hedley.
Cerithiopsis dannevigi, Hedley.
Cerithiopsis geniculosus, Hedley.
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Triphora
Turritella atkinsoni, Tentson
albovittata, Hedley.
angasi, Crosse.
armillata, Verco.
cana, Verco.
disjuncta, Verco.
epallaxa, Verco.
gemmegens, Verco.
granifera, Brazier.
novapostrema, Verco.
pfeifferi, Crosse.
regina, Hedley.
spica, Verco.
tasmanica, Tenison IVoods.
Woods, var. medio-
angulata, Verco.
Turritella mediolevis, Verco.
Turritella quadrata, Donald.
Turritella smithiana, Donald.
Vermicularia flava, Verco.
Vermicularia nodosa, Hedley .
Ianthina exigua, Lamarck.
Epitonium acanthopleura, Verco.
Epitonium valida, Verco.
Syrnola micra, Pritchard ¢> Gatliff.
Odostomia mayi, Tate.
OF
“ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Cymatium kampylum, Watson.
Cymatium olearium, Linne.
Natica elkingtoni, Hedley & May.
Natica sticta, Verco.
Polinices beddomei, Johnston.
Eunaticina albosutura, Verco.
Ancilla petterdi, Tate.
Cancellaria pergradata, Verco.
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
Marginella
altilabra, May.
biplicata, Tate <> May.
columnaria, Hedley & May.
flindersi, Pritchard & Gatliff.
fulgurata, Hedley.
gabrieli, May.
allporti, Tenison Woods.
indiscreta, May.
loddere, May.
microscopica, May.
multiplicata, Tate € May.
ovulum, Sowerby.
stanislaus, Tenison Woods.
stilla, Hedley.
vercoil, May.
Conus superstes, Hedley.
Daphnella bathentoma, Verco.
Daphnella fenestrata, Verco.
Daphnella legrandi, Beddome.
Daphnella triseriata, Verco.
Mangilia gatlifh, Verco.
Mangilia hilum, Hedley.
Mangilia kingensis, Petterd.
Mangilia spica, Hedley.
Drillia agrestis, Verco.
Drillia denseplicata, Dunker.
Drillia dilecta, Hedley.
Drillia dulcis, Sowerby.
Drillia hectorguia, Verco.
Drillia hedleyi, Verco.
Drillia jaffaensis, Verco.
Drillia lacteola, Verco.
Drillia saxea, Sowerby.
Drillia tricarinata, Tenison Woods.
Drillia trophonoides, Verco.
Drillia woodsi, Beddome.
Mitromorpha alba, Petterd, var. axiscalpta, Verco.
Mitromorpha axicostata, Verco.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 95
Mitromorpha pallidula, Hedley.
Mitromorpha paucilirata, Verco.
Mitromorpha paula, Verco.
Mitromorpha solida, May.
Hemipleurotoma may, Verco.
Mitra retrocurvata, Verco.
Mitra scalariformis, Jenison Woods.
Mitra stadialis, Hedley.
Mitra tasmanica, Tenison Woods.
Imbricaria porphyria, Verco.
Pisania schoutanica, May.
Pyrene atkinsoni, Tenison Woods.
Pyrene axiaerata, Verco.
Pyrene beachportensis, Verco.
Pyrene calva, Verco.
Pyrene jaffaensis, Verco.
Trophon plicilaminatus, Verco.
Trophon recurvatus, lerco.
Trophon segmentatus, Verco.
Coralliophila lischkeana, Dunker.
Typhis bivaricata, lerco.
Actaeon retusus, Verco. ‘
Ringicula meridionalis, Hedley.
Ringicula semisculpta, Hedley.
Cylichna arachis, Quoy € Gaimard.
Cylichna atkinsoni, Tenison IW oods.
Philine columnarius, Hedley €& May.
Philine oscitans, Hedley.
Cavolina inflexa, Lesueur
Cavolina trispinosa, Lesueur.
Cavolina virgula, Rang.
Limacina bulimoides, D’Orbigny.
Limacina inflata, D’Orbigny.
Clio balantium, Rang.
Clio pyramidata, Linne.
Dentalium lubricatum, Sowerby.
Dentalium thetidis, Hedley.
Yerebratulina cavata, Verco.
Megasella cumingil, Davidson.
Megasella vercoi, Blochman.
Campages Jjaffaensis, Blochman.
Cryptopora brazieri, Crane.
Kraussina tasmanica, Tenison Woods.
96 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
II.—DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW OR NOTABLE
SPECIES.
A.—PELECYPODA.
PLEURODON MAORIANUS, Hedley.
Pleurodon maorianus, Hedley, Rec. Austr. Mus., v., 1904,
Pe 875 et 4
Numerous examples of this occurred off Cape Wiles in too
fathoms. Some of these were of larger size than those found
in New Zealand, being 3 mm. long and 4 mm. high. The
species has not been seen previously in Australian waters.
CHLAMYS ANTIAUSTRALIS, Tate.
Pecten antiaustralis, Tate, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., viii.,
1886; p:2106,epl. ix: , of) W7aeZe xi. | SQO. spy" 269 shad.
Harris, Brit. Mus. Cat. Mert Moll. Austr. 1897, p-.355-
Numerous small valves about half an inch in length were
dredged in 100 fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles,
South Australia. Some are brightly coloured either entire
lemon-yellow or irregularly clouded with opaque white and
vermilion. Similar specimens were dredged by myself in 100
fathoms off Wollongong, New South Wales. Specimens
reaching 100 mm. in diameter were taken plentifully by Mr.
Wik: May and myself in too fathoms off Cape Pillar, Tas-
mania. We considered the species,! as Prof. R. Tate himself
had done on first acquaintance, to be a variety of C. asperrt-
mus, Lamarck. Valid distinctions pointed out by Prof. Tate
between the two species are the concentric lamine which
lattice the intercostal furrows in the voung and the multipli-
cation of the ribs in the old stages of C. antiaustralis. Com-
pared with actual fossils, the recent shell is flatter, but its
author expressly notes that C. antiaustralis “exhibits varia-
tions in the degree of convexity.’’ Probably this is the shell
identified by Gatliff and Gabriel as the young of C. radiatus,
Hutton.2 In their reference, to my opinion of the shell,
there is some misunderstanding.
The species has not hitherto been recorded as recent, and
this identification adds another survivor from the Tertiary
Fauna.
VERTICORDIA ERICIA, sp. nov
(Plate xvii., figs. 1, 2, 3.)
Shell small, subcircular, rather solid, apex incurved.
Sculpture, about eighteen prominent radiating spiral ribs,
which rapidly enlarge with the increase of the shell and pro-
1 Hedley & May—Rec. Austr. Mus., vii., 1908, p. 113.
2 Gatliff & Gabriel—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., xxiii., 1910, p. 98.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 97
ject at the margin. These are parted by broad and deep
interstices, roughened with a grain surface, whereas the
summits of the ribs bristle with short, stout, close-set, divari-
cating, little spikes. Lunule reduced to a narrow crescent
under the umbo. Interior nacreous furrowed by the imprint
of the external sculpture. In both valves a single conical
tooth is set at the margin of the lunule. Length 6°7, height
6, depth of single valve 2°3 mm.
A couple of odd valves occurred in 100 fathoms forty miles
south of Cape Wiles, South Australia. Prof. W. A. Haswell
and I dredged a fragment in 80 fathoms twenty-two miles
east of Narrabeen, New South Wales. The strong ribs and
prickly sculpture readily distinguish the species.
VERTICORDIA SETOSA, Hediey.
Verticordia rhomboidea, Hedley, Trans. N.Z. Inst., xxxviii.,
[GOS . Pa 7, pl. Wile. 12.003) ba dds nec: sAustrs Miss;
vi., 1906, p. 215. [Not Verticordia rhomboidea, Tate,
Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., ix., 1886 (1887), p. 149, pl.
aN Uo arelel|
Verticordia setosa, Hedley, nom. mut. Rec. Austr. Mus., vi.,
US OTS) 18h: Seki
A single valve from 100 fathoms, forty miles south of Cape:
Wiles, South Australia, represents a species new to the
Adelaidean Region. I took the species first in t10 fathoms
off Great Barrier Island, New Zealand, and again in 250 and
in 800 fathoms off Sydney. In the South Australian example
the radial ribs are less prominent than in the New Zealand
shells.
VENERICARDIA ROSULENTA, Tate.
(Plate xvii., fig. 4.)
Cardita rosulenta, Tate, Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., ix.,
eS. MO. OOF Plies, 1..3
The ‘‘Endeavour’’ took C. rosulenta off Devonport, Tas-
mania, and in 4o fathoms north of Cape Borda, South Aus-
tralia. A giant from the former locality is 45 mm. in length.
As the original figure is vague I offer an illustration of a
specimen 28 mm. long from St. Vincent’s Gulf, for the iden-
tification and example of which I am indebted to Dr. J. C.
Verco.1!
The nomenclature of this species is involved in difficulty.
After the publication of his name, Prof. Tate observed that
Tenison Woods had previously recognised? his shell as C.
quoyi, Deshayes, and he thereupon withdrew his rosulenta in
1 Verco—Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., xxxii., 1908, p. 349.
2 Tenison Woods—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1877, p. 59.
98 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
its favour.1 But Deshayes proposed his name for a New
Zealand shell figured and described by Quoy and Gaimard as
Venericardia australis, Lamarck. Actually, Deshayes indi-
cated for his species Pl. 80, {. 4 of the ‘‘Astrolabe’’ Atlas, but
that illustration stands for a Tridacna, and the quotation is
an evident error for Pl. 70, f. 12-14. The account of Quoy
and Gaimard did not profess to introduce a new species but
merely to restore the V’. australis of Lamarck,? a small, sub-
orbicular, purple, scale-ribbed shell from New Holland, not
otherwise figured. The contention of Deshayes was that the
Australian shell of Lamarck was wrongly identified with the
New Zealand shell of the ‘‘Astrolabe’’ Expedition. Regard-
ing the latter as a new and nameless species, he proposed to
call it Cardita quoyi. Until the Lamarckian type, now
probably in the Geneva Museum, can be re-examined, we
cannot judge whether Quoy and Gaimard were right in their
identification, and consequently whether Deshayes was, or
was not, justified in renaming their shell. But there can be
no doubt that Reeve erred in reducing Venericardia australis
to a synonym of I’. tridentata, Say.4
In any case the verdict does not affect the name before us.
Our species is quite different from that figured in the *‘Astro-
labe’’ Atlas, and to which, if it be maintained, the name of
‘“‘quoyi’? can only apply. Incidentally it may be remarked
that this name has never been adopted® by the conchologists
of New Zealand whom it chiefly concerns.
V. australis, Lamarck, is not the only species of the genus
that local workers have failed to recognise. Cardita (Actin-
obolus) godeffroyi, Dunker,® from Bass Strait, is here un-
known. I suggest that it is likely to prove identical with
V. bimaculata, Deshayes.
After being unseen for nearly forty years, the Cardita
raouli, Angas,’ has been rediscovered by Mr. W. L. May8
in 40 fathoms off Schouten Island, Tasmania. Probably this
is what Clessin intends by Cardita racuti, Angas (MS.), from
New Zealand.
a M
1 Tate—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxvi., 1901, p. 434.
2 Lamarck—Anim. Sans Vert., v., 1818, p. 610.
3 Deshayes—Proc. Zool. Soc. 1852 (1854), p. 103.
4 Reeve—Conch. Icon., i., 1843, Cardita sp. 22.
5 Suter—Index Faunz Nov. Zeal., 1904, p. 93.
6 Dunker—Malak. Blatt., xviii., 1871, p. 172; Schmeltz—Cat. Mus. Godeff.,
y., 1874, p. 173; Clessin—Conch. Cab., Lief. 353, IREVE, Ton 14, Toll, then HS Ue
7 Angas—Proc. Zool. Soc., 1872, p. 613, pl. xlii., rity eR
8 May—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1910 (1911), p. 312.
9 Clessin—Op. cit., p. 11, pl. ii., figs. 7, 8.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 99
MYRTEA BRACTEA, sp. nov
(Plate xvit., figss:5,)6).7°8,)
Shell rather solid, moderately convex, flatter in the young
stages and becoming more inflated when adolescent, squarely
oblong, subequilateral. Colour cream. No radial sculpture.
Ribs strong, elevate, varying in number and disposition,
usually about fifty and set their breadth apart, spaced medially
crowded anteriorly and posteriorly. An occasional rib pro-
jects at the edge of the lunule and escutcheon, thus forming
a dorsal crest of imbricating scales. Umbo small, prominent.
Lunule narrow, excavate, chiefly developed in the left valve.
Two cardinals in the left valve. Margins of the valve entire.
Length 10’5, height 9°5, depth of single valve 2°5 mm.
This species is near M. brazieri,, Sowerby,! but larger,
rounder, more inflated and more densely ribbed.
M. mayt, Gatliff & Gabriel,? is also like it, but M. bractea
differs hy lacking radial sculpture, by being more inflated and
closer ribbed.
Hab.—Several specimens from 100 fathoms, forty miles
south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
CORBIS PERCOSTATA, sp. nov.
(Plateixvar, isto. TO. Tinie.)
Shell small, rather solid, inflated inequilateral, anteriorly
produced, dorsal margin rather straight, ventral margin
rounded. Umbo incurved, bearing a distinct prodissoconch.
Sculpture: About thirty-two elevated, strong concentric ribs
run from end to end and closely follow one another from the
umbo to the ventral margin. From each rib a thin broad
flange arching downwards conceals most of the interspace
between the ribs. Lunule small, limited by an_ indistinct
groove. Pallial line entire, running from one adductor to the
other. Within the ventral margin is set a line of small
sockets and tubercles about forty-five in number. Dentition:
In the right are two cardinals, the posterior strongest, the
anterior half the size of its fellow, compressed and parallel to
the hinge plate, anteriorly and posteriorly a slender lateral.
In the left, the anterior cardinal of typical Corbis is repre-
sented by a minute tubercle, posterior cardinal is strong and
pointed. Anteriorly a groove receives the right lateral,
posteriorly the margin of the valve is produced to act as a
lateral. Behind the main.cardinals is a slight and elongate
chondrophore. Length 4°5, height 3°6, depth of single valve
i 30mm:
1 Bowerly, Eros, Zook Soc., 1883, rp oil; = vii., f. 2, and Hedley—Mem.
Austr. Mus., 1902, p. 319.
2 Gatlift & Gabriel Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., xxiv., n.s., 1911, p. 189, pl. xlvii.,
gs. 8-
Ioo “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
This species is nearest related to Chione despecta, Hedley,!
from 100 fathoms off Wollongong, New South Wales, than
which the novelty is larger, more inequilateral, longer in pro-
portion to height and more closely ribbed. When I described
C. despecta seven years ago I failed to distinguish the muscle
scars. Now I find there is no pallial sinus. But the dis-
crepancy between its hinge and that of typical Chione warned
me of possible error. Revising the generic position with the
aid of the new and related species, I am now constrained to
refer both to Corbis. Hitherto only a single recent species,
a large and handsome shell from the coral reef zone, has been
admitted to this genus. The hinge characters do not exactly
correspond. These two small species appear to have suffered
such atrophy as descent to calm, deep water might be
expected to induce in the hinge dev elopment of small and thin
shells.
Hab.—Numerous specimens in too fathoms forty miles
south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
CHIONE MESODESMA, Quoy €> Gaimard.
Venus mesodesma, Quoy & Gaimard, Voy. “‘Astrolabe,’’
Zool. , ii), 1835, Pp. S32, plaixexxiv.,) 1.097, 1659... Smithy
Rep: Voy. Challis; Zool’, xii 1885), (ps 131.
A few specimens in 1oo fathoms forty miles south of Cape
Wiles. Mr. W. L. May and I took it in abundance in 100
fathoms off Cape Pillar, Tasmania.2 These specimens were
worn, and, without close scrutiny, were passed for Chione
gallinula, Lamarck. This is the first definite Australian
record, though New Holland was assigned to the species in
the original description.
B.—GASTEROPODA.
PUNCTURELLA FUMARIUM, sp. nov.
(Plate xvneeaies: 13°, 14.)
Shell laterally compressed, thin, translucent, erect, the
posterior profile usually slightly convex and the anterior
slightly concave. Sculpture: Delicate concentric growth
lines, small tubercles, conspicuous in profile, are set in radial
rows. Summit irregularly notched, subcircular seen from
above, cleft with a short, steep posterior limb seen from the
side, the spiral apex disappearing from half-grown specimens
Septal plate deeply inserted, nearly perpendicular. Length
2°15, breadth 1°35, height 1°85 mm.
1 Hedley—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxviii., 1904, p. 193, pl. x., f. 35-8.
2 Hedley & May=Rec. Austr. Mus., vVii., 1908, p. 114.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 101
Already from Australia there are recorded P. hemipsila,
Tate, from the Tasmanian Eocene, and recent P. corolla,
Verco, from South Australia; P. demissa, Hedley, now
recorded from South Australia in association with P. fum-
arium, and previously from New South Wales, Victoria and
New Zealand; P. galerita, Hedley, from Queensland; P.
harrissoni, Beddome, from Tasmania, Victoria and New South
Wales, and P. kestevenit, Hedley, from New South Wales.
The novelty belongs to the section Fissurisepta now first
represented in Australasia.
Hab.—Several specimens from too fathoms, forty miles
south of Cape Wiles.
MONILEA OLEACEA, Hedley & Petterd.
Monilea oleacea, Hedley & Petterd, Rec. Austr. Mus., vi.
19OO,Np-. 255,) Plo SeXvil.., fig. 1.
Some broken but recognisable specimens of this species
were taken in 100 fathoms, forty miles south of Cape Wiles.
The type was from 250 fathoms outside Sydney, so the
present record extends it to another region. The _ specific
name appeared in the description by a misprint as ‘‘oleata,”’
but was spelt correctly on the previous page 214 and in the
explanation of the plate.
b
GIBBULA OCELLINA, sp. nov.
(Plate rxvii., fis.)15-)
Shell small, solid, imperforate, conical, with gradate spire,
prominently keeled at the periphery and again at the shoulder.
Colour: Below the periphery uniform buff, above it broad,
radial stripes of buff pink, alternate with white. Along the
periphery are pairs of dashes of madder brown, sometimes
these enclose a tinted space and have a background of opaque
white, thus assuming an ocellated aspect ; apex pink. Whorls
five. Sculpture: Base with seven flat evenly-spaced concen-
tric riblets, a strong, revolving cord defines the periphery
and ascends the spire. The last and penultimate whorls have
four spiral riblets above the periphery, the uppermost
stronger and forming the angle of a subsutural shelf. Upper
whorls smooth. Aperture round, outer tip simple, dentate by
the spirals, columella perpendicular. Length 3, major diam.
3, minor diam. 2°5 mm.
The profile recalls that of G. coxi, Angas, but by the sum
of its characters this comes nearest to G. tiberiana, Crosse.
From that the angulation and smaller size distinguish the
novelty.
Hab.—Several specimens from too fathoms, forty miles
south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
102 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
DANILIA TELEBATHIA, Sp. nov.
(Plate xvili., figs. 16, 17.)
Shell ovate, acuminate, imperforate, thin and_ slightly
nacreous. Whorls seven, the first wound horizontally, thus
giving the spire a decapitated aspect. Median whorls
separated by a channeled suture, flattened on the shoulder and
subangled at the periphery, the last slightly descending
behind the aperture. Colour: Pale buff with scattered irregular
dashes of ochre alternate chocolate dots on the outer lip.
Sculpture: The last whorl carries eleven widely-spaced fine
spiral cords, the peripheral strongest. Of these six appear on
the penultimate and fade gradually away on the upper whorls.
Both cords and interspaces are crossed by delicate oblique
lamella which rise into scales upon the cords. They are
crowded on the last whorl, do not cross the suture from
whorl to whorl, and become fewer and fainter ascending the
spire. The initial whorl is smooth. Aperture very oblique,
subcircular. Outer lip effuse, fimbriated by the termination of
the spiral sculpture, inner lip projecting over the umbilical
region, thence spread from the axis to the right insertion as
a solid sheet. Columella spirally ascending within, terminat-
ing below in'a downwardly directed tubercle, succeeded by a
deep notch and an answering ridge. Thence along the edge
of the gullet underneath the external varix are about a score
of callus rays, alternately long and short, leading to the
throat. Behind the aperture, about a millemetre from the
free edge, is a sharp, narrow varix rising gradually at the base
and ending abruptly at the suture. Length 10, breadth 8 mm.
Judging from literature, our shell is more elevated and finely
sculptured than D. tinei, Calcara.
This genus has not before been reported from the Southern
Hemisphere. As in the Mediterranean and off the Azores, it
appears to be confined to deep water.
While on the subject of deep-sea Trochoids, I take this
opportunity of pointing out that Trochus (Gibbula) glyptus,
Watson,! from 410 fathoms off Sydney, should be transferred
to Turcicula.
Hab.—Several specimens from roo fathoms forty miles
south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
LEPTOTHYRA FUGITIVA, Sp. nov.
(Plate xviii., figs. 18, 19, 20.)
Shell small, solid, depressed-turbinate, narrowly perforate.
Colour white. Whorls three and a half, rapidly increasing,
last rounded, descending at the aperture. Spire slightly
1 Watson—Chall. Rep., Zool., xv., 1886, p. 75, pl. vi., fig. 6.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 10%
gradate. Sculpture: On the base and spire are faint traces of
radial sculpture. Along the suture runs a GC»ep groove
followed by a corresponding ridge. The remainder of the last
whorl is surrounded by a succession of numerous fine spiral
threads parted by equal grooves. Aperture subcircular, above
with the vestige of a varix, below a fold running from the
anterior edge of the mouth to the margin of the umbilicus,
edge of lip simple bevelled within, columella excavate. Base
rather flat. Umbilicus narrow but deep, a sixth of the shell’s
diameter. Major diameter 1°85, minor diameter 1°55, height
I 2 mm.
This is smaller, flatter and more finely grooved than other
Australian species.
Hab.—Numerous specimens were dredged in too fathoms
forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
RISSOA HULLIANA, Tate,
VAR. EUCRASPEDA, var. nov
(Plate xvi jtios 22)
This deep-sea variety differs from the typical shore form by
being pure white, slightly larger and comparatively broader,
and “by having fewer’ and more prominent radials. Thus it
acquires a lip broader and more scalloped, approaching a
varix.
Hab.—Several specimens in 100 fathoms forty miles south
of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
RISSOA LOCKYERI, sp. nov
(Plate xviit.,- fig 22.)
Shell small, rather thin, ovate-conical, imperforate. Colour
white. Whorls four, of which the two first are sharply
marked off as the protoconch. Sculpture: On the shoulder
is a smooth, unbroken slope, succeeded by elevated, widely-
spaced spiral keels, of which the last whor! bears eight and
the penultimate three. On the earlier whorls are numerous
fine spiral stria. The interstices of the keels are engraved
with close radial scratches. Aperture subcircular, lip slightly
expanded. Behind the columella is a narrow axial crevice.
Length 2, breadth 1°3 mm.
The species is named in honour of Mr. N. Lockyer, Comp-
troller of Customs, under whose auspices these collections
were made. It is related to R. imbrex,! than which it is
smaller, broader in proportion, and possesses more spirals.
Hab.—Numerous specimens were taken in 100 fathoms
forty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
1 Hedley—Proc. Linn. Soe. N.S. Wales, xxxili., 1908, p. 469, pl. x., f. 33.
104 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
RISSOA VERCONIANA, Sp. nov.
(Plate xix., fig. 23-)
Shell small, ovate, thin, translucent. Colour white. Whorls
four, rounded and parted by deep sutures. Sculpture: First
whorl and a half smooth, next with about twenty-five sharp
though delicate radial ribs, these increase till on the last whorl
they amount to about forty, below the periphery they fade
gradually. Different individuals vary in the development and
number of these radials. On the last whorl eight or ten spirals
equal in grade to the radials override them, thus enclosing
rectangular meshes. On the upper whorls the spirals grad-
ually vanish, so that on the base are spirals alone and on the
upper whorls radials alone. A secondary microscopic sculp-
ture of close spiral scratches is most conspicuous in the meshes
of the body whorl. Aperture subcircular, angled above.
Outer lip fortified by a slight external varix, columella margin
expanded and reflected over a small umbilical furrow. Length
2, breadth 1°25 mm.
This species is closely related to R. filosa, Hedley and
Petterd,! from the east coast, but that is larger, has an extra
whorl and is more coarsely sculptured. That the difference
is not due to growth is shown by the contrast between the
upper whorls of the two species. The novelty is dedicated to
Dr. J. C. Verco, who has done such admirable work on the
Marine Mollusca of South Australia.
Hab.—Numerous specimens from 100 fathoms forty miles
south of Cape Wiles, South Australia.
AMPHITHALAMUS COSTATUS, Sp. nov.
(Plate xix., fig. 24.)
Shell small, rather solid, imperforate, narrowly oblong,
glossy. Colour uniform ivory white. Whorls five, including
a smooth turbinate protoconch of two whorls. Adult whorls
wound obliquely, parted by a deeply channeled suture. Sculp-
ture: Broad, flat radial ribs of irregular breadth, crowded on
the last half whorl, their ends denticulate the summits of the
whorls. So sharp and narrow are the interstices as to resemble
cracks. On the last whorl the radials amount to twenty-two.
Aperture trumpet-mouthed, oblique, submedian. Length 3,
breadth 1°3.
Attempts have been made by Tryon? and by Tate’ to sub-
divide the Rissoa of Australia into groups. These arrange-
ments, though helpful, cannot be regarded as final. If only
1 Hedley & Petterd—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1906, p. 217, pl. xxxvii., f. 2.
2 Tryon—Man. Conch., ix., 1887, pp. 314-69.
3 Tate—Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Austr., xxiii., 1899, pp. 232-7.
MOLLUSCA.—HEDLEY. 105
as a convenience it would be desirable to break up a genus so
unwieldy as Rissoa is according to Tryon’s presentation.
Bearing in mind that the type of Rissoa, Freminville, 1814, is
Turbo cimex., Linn.,! it is clear that many of the Australian
shells usually so called are not entitled to the name.
In studying the Rissoide taken by the ‘‘ Thetis’? Expedition,?
I noted that, though Watson’s subgenus Scrobs had been
reduced by Tryon to a synonym of the earlier A mphithalamus,
Carpenter, yet Carpenter’s type was rejected by Tryon as
insufficiently known. Under these circumstances it seemed
unsafe to use Amphithalamus.
By the kindness of Mrs. B. Williamson, of Los Angeles, Cali-
fornia, I have received a specimen of the type species of the
genus A. inclusus, Carp., collected by Mr. Henry Hemphill.
No illustration of the species seems to have yet appeared, so
I figure (PI. xx., fig. 34) the gift of Mrs. Williamson, which
had been identified as A. inclusus, Carp.,5 by Dr. W. H.
Dall. On this foundation I can now accept and use Tryon’s
interpretation of the synonomy.
> ia
re * Ps
ie
9 7"
= a ( = 7
= - se
Sy
. Rely ee ty
_—) vou 7
EXPLANATION OF PLATE V.
Centriscops humerosus, Richardson. Three-fourths natural
size.
ZOOL.
“ee
RESULTS
. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
“ENDEAVOUR.”
a
&
]
g
5
.
-
u
PrATE Ve
EXPLANATION OF PLATE VI.
Fig. 1. Hippocampus abdominalis, Lesson. Natural size.
ey bros ae graciliformis, sp. nov. Twice
natural size.
PLATE V]
“ENDEAVOUR.”’
LOOK IESUIEES
» AG by’ . Bt
; 2 ‘
|
7
"he ae
Str Tit a
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPLANATION OF PEATE Vit:
Fig. 1. Pempheris affinis, sp. nov. Slightly reduced.
» 2. Cyttus nove-gzelandiea, Clarke. Slightly reduced.
PLATE VII.
“ENDEAVOUR.”
SULTS
ZOOL. RE
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE VIII.
Austroberyx gerrardii, Ginther. Natural size.
ZOOL: RESULELS: “ENDEAVOUR.” RrAne SVAN
~ oN
wes,
EROS
~ Re
wit
.
SS
a ~ .
RSS _
ee
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE IX.
Fig. 1. Seriolella brama, Giinther. Almost three-fourths
natural size.
2. Solegnaihus robustus, sp. nov. Almost three-
fourths natural size.
a
IX.
PLATE
AVOUR.”’
NDE
WLAN Sy Yea
ak
RI
ZOOL:
Re f sh
AS
a
at ay
ance
Te tied
a
ie MCCULLOCH, del.
A.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE X.
Fig. 1. Seriolella punctata, Forster. Almost three-fourths
natural size.
2. Taeniomembras microstoma, Gunther. Twice and
one-fourth natural size.
PEATE Xe
NDEAVOUR. ™
oe
LOOK VRESUET'S
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPLANATION OF PEATE XI-
Goniistius vizonarius, Kent. About one-half natural size.
Pie Ai wee
NDEAVOUR.”’
OE
SUIGUS
4
RE
LOOK.
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XII.
Dactylosparus macropterus, Forster. Slightly reduced.
PLATE XII
“RNDEAVOUR. a
Nii
;
é
‘ iy
yy
YI ‘)
‘ PV SLA A Gas
) ‘ ; f
22h a yyeered 1)
&
L KA?
“yi
A R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPEANATION VOR WgAT ESE
Pseudolabrus cyanogenys, Ramsay and Ogilby. One-half
natural size.
PLATE XSLE:
—ENDEAVOUR-”:
ZOOL, ‘(RESULTS
rt t | eee e
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIV.
Chromis hypsilepsis, Giinther. Natural size.
XIV
PLATE
SAVOUR.’
“ENDE
SUETS
LO OW WE
MCCULLOCH, del.
A. R.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XV.
Schuettea scalaripinnis, Steindachner. Slightly reduced.
PLATE, Ve
“ENDEAVOUR.”
SUES
HO OT RE
UY
:
/
———
=
)
iy
om
yy
yi y) AA
ynheiy
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
ol
.
bo
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVI.
Zenopsis nebulosus, Schlegel. Three-fifths naturai
size.
Atherina dannevigi, sp. nov. Once and one-fifth
natural size.
Priopis ramsayi, Macleay. Once and one-fifth
natural size.
PPA exavile
”
“ENDEAVOUR.
RESUEMS
ZOOL:
“yee
SY XVIVITT TTY ( ”
AAO CE OO '
Weddle WA Wve YY
A. R. MCCULLOCH, del.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIT.
Figs. 1, 2, 3. Verticordia ericia, Hedley. Exterior, hinge
and magnified sculpture.
Fig. 4. Venericardia rosulenta, Tate.
5, 6, 7, 8. Myrte@a bractea, Hedley. Lateral and
superior aspects and hinges.
g, 10, 11, 12. Corbis percostata, Hedley. Exterior
and interior aspects and hinges.
ZOOL, RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR?” PLATE XVII.
PHYLLIS CLARKE, del.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIII.
13, 14. Puncturella fumarium, Hedley. Lateral and
superior aspects.
15. Gibbula ocellina, Hedley.
16, 17. Danilia telebathia, Hedley. Shell and varix.
18, 19, 20. Leptothyra fugitiva, Hedley. Lateral,
superior and inferior aspects.
Rissoa hulliana, Vate, var. eucraspeda, Hedley.
», lockyert, Hedley.
ZOOL, RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XVIII.
PHYLLIS CLARKE, del.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIX.
Fig. 23. Rissoa verconiana, Hedley.
,, 24. Amphithalamus costatus, Hedley.
» 25- Onoba bassiana, Hedley.
Figs. 26, 27. Cerithiopsis dannevigi, Hedley.
enlarged apex.
,, 28, 29. Cerithiopsis geniculosus, Hedley.
enlarged apex.
Shell and
‘Shell and
»> 30, 31, 32, 33. Marginella fulgurata, Hedley. Colour
variety and typical form, immature shell in which
the spire whorls appear through a film of callus, and
senile stage in which the spire is buried under a pile
of callus.
ZOOL RESULETS= “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XIX.
eEEAY
i)
PHYLLIS OLARKE, del.
Fig.
Figs.
Fig.
”
Figs.
EXPLANATLON TOR (EIA Xone
34. Amphithalamus inclusus, Carpenter.
35, 36. Conus superstes, Hedley, and separate proto-
conch.
37. Mitra stadialis, Hedley.
38. Ringicula meridionalis, Hedley.
39, 40. Ringicula semisculpta, Hedley. Lateral and
frontal aspects.
41, 42. Campbages jaffensis, Blochmann. Different
aspects of the brachial apparatus.
te,
ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XX
eo,
PHYLLIS CLARKE, del.
III. Report on the Sponges obtained by the F.I.S.
’
‘“ Endeavour’
Victoria, South Australia, Queensland,
manila.
PAR
BY
BE. KF. HALLMANN, B.Sc., ZooLocist
Australian Museum,
Sydney.
Plates) XXI.-xxXV1I.3 Mextfigs: 21-69:
on the Coasts of New South Wales,
and ‘Tas-
42414
SPONGES.—HALLMANN.
Il].— REPORT ON THE SPONGES.
Part I.
I.— INTRODUCTION.
The Sponges which have so far been obtained by the
‘Endeavour’’ consist almost exclusively of Monaxonellida and
IKeratosa in approximately equal numbers. In this Report I
propose to deal only with the former of these; the latter will
scarcely prove suitable for purposes of investigation unless
taken in conjunction with additional material, since in the
main they are preserved in a dry condition, and there are
among them altogether too few specimens of any one species.
Inasmuch as an extensive collection of well-preserved Keratose
sponges, particularly from the Australian area, would un-
questionably be of extreme scientific value, it is greatly to be
hoped that the fullest advantage will be taken of the unique
opportunities provided by the trawling operations of the
‘*Endeavour’’ to bring together as large a number as possible
of these forms.
In order to deal effectively with the material placed at my
disposal, it was found necessary, as a preliminary task, to
undertake the re-investigation of certain previously described
species, including more particularly a number of those which
were first described by Dr. R. von Lendenfeld in his ‘‘ Descrip-
tive Catalogue of Sponges in the Australian Museum,’’! and
afterwards by Mr. 1. Whitelegge in his ‘‘Report on Sponges
from the Coastal Beaches of New South Wales.’ As a
result I find that, whereas the latter author is correct in
pronouncing the original descriptions of these species to be
in many instances inaccurate, yet he himself has committed a
number of serious errors, owing to a too hasty conclusion that
the specimens investigated were the actual types. This
explains the anomalous circumstance that the descriptions
which the two authors have given of certain species are
devoid of agreement in any essential particular. Unfortun-
ately, however, not all the discrepancies can be thus explained,
and considerable caution will be necessary in deciding par-
ticular cases. Mr. Whitelegge evidently proceeded on the
assumption that the specimen carrying the author’s label must
be accepted unquestioningly, in preference to the description,
as the ultimate criterion of the species; but, although such a
1 8vo, Sydney, 1888.
2 Whiteleege—Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 55, pls. x.-xv
118 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
course may be perfectly reasonable and right so long as the
authenticity of the specimen remains undoubted, it surely can
no longer be pursued when sufficient evidence exists to prove
the contrary.
It was not my intention, at the outset, to include in this
Keport any details of the results of this subsidiary investiga-
tion (except in so far as they bore directly upon the species of
the “‘Endeavour’’ collection), but to reserve them as the
subject of an independent paper. Owing, however, to the
very unsatisfactory state of the descriptions of many of the
species examined, and in view of the possibility that a con-
siderable time may elapse before a complete account of them
can be furnished, I came to the conclusion that it would be
wrong to allow this opportunity to pass without at any rate
making such corrections as might render possible their identi-
fication. Accordingly I have added to the Report, often in the
form merely of foot-notes, a series of observations which
practically amount to a brief revision of the Ectyonine
originally described in various publications of the Aus-
tralian Museum. As the work of preparation was con-
ducted in the Australian Museum itself, I have had the advan-
tage of having before me in most cases the actual specimens,
and in many cases the actual slides upon which the original
descriptions were based. In addition, very material assist-
ance was afforded me in the identification of species by a
valuable series of mounted sections of Port Phillip sponges
and a large number of fragments of Australian sponges pre-
served in the British Museum, which Prof. A. Dendy some
years ago generously placed at the disposal of this Museum.
In regard to certain Ectyonine species I have expressed the
opinion that new genera should be established for them, but
I have purposely refrained from introducing such new genera
because I recognise that, in order to do this in a thoroughly
satisfactory manner, it would be necessary to undertake a
much wider comparative study of the species of this group
than—owing to lack of literature, if for no other reason—I
have found to be possible.
After the manuscript of the Report had been completed and
at too late a date to admit of any alterations in the text, I
received a copy of the second part of Dr. Hentschel’s paper
on the sponges of South-west Australia; consequently any de-
ductions which it has enabled me to make are necessarily
relegated to the footnotes, or to concluding paragraphs.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 119
IIl.—DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES.
FamMity SPIRASTRELLIDA.
GENUS SPIRASTRELLA, Schmidt.
SPIRASTRELLA MONTIFORMIS, Sp. nov.
(Plate xxi. ties, 2h andelio. ) 2.1.)
Sponge mound-shaped, rising to a central peak, on the
summit of which one or several oscula are situated;
upper aspect of sponge with short digitiform or ridge-
like processes on which apical oscula are rarely to be
found. No rind. Spicules not aggregated into definite
fibres. Megascleres :—Tylostyli (sometimes reduced to
slyli), of varying length and stoutness, reaching a maxi-
mum size of 710 x 12 4. Maicroscleres :—Spirasters of
two kinds, viz., shorter tuberculated forms principally
confined to the superficial layer, 25 long g; and slender
zigzag sharp-spined forms chiefly to be found in the
canal walls of the interior and reaching to $0 yt or more
in length.
This species is represented in the collection by eight speci-
mens, all of which are preserved in the dry state. Although
showing a moderate amount of variability in external form,
they may be satisfactorily described in general terms as mas-
sive, sessile, somewhat mound- -shaped sponges, roughly
circular in horizontal section, and usually prolonged upwards
into a more or less well-defined pinnacle. They are attached
by a broad base of only slightly lesser extent than the maxi-
mum transversal of the sponge, which is attained some short
distance above it. The fact that the maximum girth does not
coincide with the actual base, renders the term ‘‘mound-
shaped”’ not perfectly applicable, and admits of a distinction
into an extensive upper surface, and a _ restricted lower
one. [rom the former there arise few or many elevations in
the form either of short digitiform processes, or of compressed
ridges. The interior of the sponge, to within a few milli-
metres of the surface, is traversed by numerous rather wide
canals, some of which attain a diameter of 10 mm.; they are
lined by a distinct aspiculous membrane, which also forms
dissepiments across their lumina. ‘The central peak is pene-
trated to its apex by one or several of these canals, which
terminate in a corresponding number of oscula. Occasionally
a few of the secondary elevations are similarly provided, but
usually they contain only minor branches of the canal system.
120 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
In the present condition of the sponges, the oscula are
closed, and not readily perceived; but their presence is, in
every case, indicated by longitudinal furrows and puckers of
the extremity of the processes bearing them, and is, of course,
readily demonstrated by sectioning. Of the specimens of the
present series, the largest and the smallest are those which
depart most from the mean form.
The former is sub-elliptical in
horizontal outline, and in 120 mm.
in height; the principal diameters
of its base are 140 mm. and go
mm. respectively, whilst the cor-
responding measurements of its
greatest transverse section are
200 mm. and 120 mm. It ts fur-
nished with more than 100 pro-
cesses, the greater number of
which are ridge-shaped. The
smallest specimen is subfusiform
in shape, and is provided with
only four digitiform processes.
The consistency in the dry state
is, one might say, intermediate
between that of cork and pith; the
superficial layer is slightly harder
and more friable, but there is no
indication of a rind. The colour
is pale grey within, and yellowish-
grey on the surface. The skeleton
is diffuse, without any indication
of definite fibres, and consists of a
fairly dense and irregular aggre-
gation of straight spicules show-
ing all gradations between styli
and tylostyli. Even in proximity
to the surface there is no well-
Fig. 21—S. montiformis. a defined arrangement of the mega-
Larger tylostyli (basal ex- scleres, although a considerable
tremity). b Slender tylo- proportion of them stand more or
styli (ditto). c Spined spi- face. Specmendicularciy ath thee
rasters. d Tuberculated See cn oles car ae
spiraster. points (or not infrequently, in the
case of the larger spicules, with
their basal extremities) impinging on, or barely projecting
beyond, the surface. The spirasters are comparatively few in
number and are confined almost exclusively to the external
surface and to the walls of the canals immediately beneath
their lining membrane.
SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. Tan
Megascleres.—lIt is difficult to say whether these belong to
one, two, or three categories. At first sight it might appear
that two kinds are to be distinguished, viz., (i.) stouter tylo-
styli, with a tylosis of only moderate size, ‘which is perhaps
most frequently subterminal in position and more or less re-
duced (or sometimes absent) and which has a quite smooth
surface and not very variable contour; and (11.) very slender
tylostyli (of scarcely lesser length), in which the frequently
relatively large tylosis is extremely variable in shape and size,
often exhibits tubercular irregularities of the surface, and is
occasionally several times repeated. The former spicules vary
in length from less than 200 pt to slightly more than 700 jt,
and in diameter up to 12 jt; it is seldom, however, that their
length exceeds 650 jt or their diameter 10 yt; usually they
taper to a quite sharp point, but more or less strongylote
terminations occur. The latter or slender tylostyli appear
to be rarely more than 3 jt in diameter and may attain a length
of at least 640 p. A oe thorough scrutiny of the spicules
shows, however, that forms intermediate between these kinds
occur, though they are comparatively few in number; and,
taking all the facts into consideration, it 1s not possible to
decide with certainty whether the two degrees of stoutness are
merely the expression of different developmental stages, or
whether they have a more important significance and indicate
either that the spicules have undergone a partial differentia-
tion into two groups or actually represent two distinct orders.
Again, it is to be observed that the stouter spicules vary con-
siderably in length; and on analysis it appears not improbable
that in another respect also a certain amount of differentiation
into two groups has been affected since a relatively large pro-
portion of the spicules below a length of 300 y or thereabouts
(the diameter of which is 6 to 8 #) are simply stylote, and are
subfusiform in shape. But these peculiarities are not confined
to the shorter spicules, and are not, indeed, strikingly charac-
teristic of them. These shorter spicules appear to greatly
predominate amongst those which stand perpendicularly at
the surface of the sponge.
Microscleres.—Spirasters of two kinds occur:
(i.) Small tuberculated forms, extremely variable in shape,
often with the tubercules chiefly confined to one side,
12 to 32 # in length, and up to 4 # in breadth exclu-
sive of the tubercules. These, together with an
inconsiderable admixture of those of the second kind,
form an exceedingly thin but apparently not continu-
ous superficial layer, and also occur in_ limited
numbers in the canal walls.
122 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
(ii.) Elongated spined forms, occurring for the most part
only in the immediate circumference of the canals, in
the walls of which they lie tangentially, loosely
scattered in a single layer. It frequently happens that
several together are apposed so closely, and in such
a way, that they cannot by any means be distinguished
from a single large branched spicule. Speaking
generally, they are characterised by their slender zig-
zag form, and the very evident spiral arrangement of
their spines. Their length, which is rather variable,
sometimes reaches above 80 y; their diameter rarely
exceeds 3 pt.
Loc.—East coast of Queensland, seven miles east of
Double Island Point, 33 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
S. montiformis is probably most nearly related to S. vaga-
bunda, Ridley, and S. tentorioides, Dendy. ‘The striking
resemblance which its elongated zigzag spirasters bear to
those of Clionopsis platei, Thiele, and to certain species of
Cliona, not only supports the opinion that Spirastrella, Cliona
and Clionopsis are allied genera, but seems also to show that
such spirasters are of primitive form.
SPIRASTRELLA POCULOIDES, Sp. nov.
(Plate xxi., fig. 1, and fig. 22.)
Sponge sessile, massively cup-shaped. Surface smooth ;
even, or provided with a few low dome-shaped eleva-
tions. The oscula (?) are microscopic circular openings
on an average *25 mm. apart. Skeleton semi-diffuse, non-
fibrous; spirasters scattered in moderate abundance
throughout all parts and forming a cortical layer. Megas-
cleres :—Tylostyli of a single kind measuring 560 x 13 wl.
Microscleres :—Spirasters of a single kind, 50 x to yw.
The following description is based on a single specimen.
The sponge is a stout-walled and exceeding thick-bottomed,
compressed, sessile cup. Its shape may be conceived as hav-
ing been attained by the upgrowth of a broad pillar, in which
growth has proceeded most rapidly at the periphery. The
surface is very smooth, and generally even; the only inequali-
ties are in the form of a few broad, rounded protuberances.
The interior of the sponge is free from noticeable cavities, and
of very uniform structure throughout. The texture of its
internal substance, when dry, is such as might result from the
close compression of some finely divided fibrous material ; there
is no appearance macroscopically of extended fibres. Owing
to the firmness and density of the superficial layer and the
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 1
2
compactness of the skeleton generally, the sponge ts (in the
dry state) fairly hard and incompressible. The dimensions
of the specimen are as follows :—Height, 100 mm. ; depth of
cup, 40 mm.; average thickness of
cup-wall, 15 mm. ; principal internal
diameters of cup, 120 mm. and 30
mm. No oscula are visible to the
naked eye. The surface, however, is
pierced by minute circular openings
40 to 50 p in diameter and, on an
average, about 250 # apart. In a
thick vertical section, cut trans-
versely through the cup-wall, two
regions are roughly distinguishable :
(i.) A superficial layer varying
from t mm. to 4 mm. wide,
in which the spicules are
not at all collected into
strands, but are closely
crowded without recognis-
able order except in some
parts of its outer limits,
where the majority of the
spicules may stand more or
less perpendicularly to the
surface. The spirasters,
which are plentifully scat-
tered throughout the whole
sponge, become more and
more closely aggregated as
the surface is approached,
and ultimately produce, by
their close crowding, a
dense and compact thin
external crust.
(ii.) An extensive central region
traversed by irregularly
sinuous, ascending ‘‘fibres”’
or ‘‘columns’’ composed of
loosely associated spicules.
Tngeeitemssiection the
‘‘columns’’ appear to be
discontinuous, owing pro-
i
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 22—S. poculotdes
a Tylostyle. a4 Ditto
basalextremity). b Spi-
rasters.
bably to their passing out of the plane of section.
They sometimes broaden out into diffuse bands,
sometimes contract into more compact strands. The
124 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
spaces between the ‘‘columns’’ are occupied by a pro-
fusion of single spicules, spicule bundles, short
spicule dies: and sheet-like patches, as w ell as by
scattered spirasters: all of which together constitute
no inconsiderable proportion of the. entire skeleton,
and in macroscopic examination mask from view the
more definitely fibrous aggregations of the spicules.
Spicules.
(i.) The megascleres are tylostyli which, as a rule, are
straight; they are of uniform diameter throughout
the greater part of their length and gradually taper
thence to a sharp point; greatest size 560 x 13 yl.
(i1.) The spirasters are of a single kind and reach a length
of 50 »# (though usually much shorter) and a dia-
meter, exclusive of spines, of 5 to 10 #. The spines
are large, approximating in length to the diameter of
the spicule-shaft, and in the case of the larger spic-
ules are about twenty in number.
Loc.—North coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of
Sandon Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
SPIRASTRELLA ALCYONIOIDES, sp. nov.
(Plate xxdy ioe 2) and) fie 233)
Sponge an erect, compact, sessile cluster of frondiform
or of angular or only slightly compressed digitiform up-
gro: wihs, of which some proceed from the very base of the
sponge, whilst some arise as outgrowths or lobes from
others. Oscula situated apically on the digitiform ter-
minals. Surface smooth, with slight longitudinal in-
equalities and a few small ascendant papilliform projec-
tions. Sponge in the dry state very hard. Skeleton
semi-diffuse; without fibres, but with occasional very
broad columns of parallely-arranged spicules. The sub-
stance of the sponge is abundantly traversed by browntsh
spongin-like streaks which, however, show no particular
relation to the spicule arrangement. Spirasters of a
single kind are plentifully scattered throu gh all parts and
form a compact superficial layer. Spicules :—Tylostyli of
one kind, with blunt rounded distal extremity, measuring
440 x § pw; and large-spined stout spirasters, 40 x 7 Wt.
Two specimens of this species were obtained, both of which
are preserved in a dry state. The characteristic form of the
sponge appears to result from the upgrowth, in the first place,
of a few processes from a basal disk of limited extent, which
processes, as they grow, either remain simply digitiform,
SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. l25
or become broadened and flattened (frondiform) and more or
less subdivided. In any case the uppermost part of the
sponge consists chiefly, of separated digitiform terminals,
which are usually tapered
and somewhat pointed,
and are provided apically
each with one or a few
oscula. The larger speci-
men (Plate xxi., fig. 3),
which measures 130 mm.
in height, consists almost
entirely of frondiform
components; the smaller, 3
if digitiform. Inits dried ,
condition, the sponge 1s
particularly dense, hard
and tough; although the
amount of shrinkage has
seemingly been but slight.
The surface is smooth,
but slightly uneven owing
to the presence of dis-
continuous undulations
and obscure ridges,
which, however, may be
due to contraction. In
addition, the sponge is
provided with small scat-
tered verruciform up-
wardly directed eleva- ,
tions; these are some-
times fairly numerous on
the upper margins of the
more flattened upgrowths,
but, generally speaking,
their occurrence is _ irre-
gular and it is not certain
that they are a constant
feature. ihe colour of
the sponge is _yellowish- Fig. 23—Spirastrella alcyonioides.
grey. a Tylostyle. 4 Ditto. (basal ex-
The precise arrange- ‘émity). b Spiraster.
ment of the skeleton is
not apparent in the present condition of the specimens owing
to the distortion which it has undergone, consequent upon
drying. It is only possible to refer in general terms to its
main features (e.g., as exhibited in longitudinal section of a
126 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
digitiform terminal). Such a section, in general, shows one or
two main or oscular canals cut longitudinally, and a spicular
skeleton which is, for the most part, of a diffuse type, without
any definite aggregation of spicules into fibres. It is traversed,
however, by a few broad ‘‘columns”’ of rather closely packed
parallel spicules, somewhat resembling the ‘‘axial condensa-
tions”’ of certain Axinellids. Some of these run longitudinally,
whilst others are cut transversely. Another feature, perhaps
deserving of note, is the occurrence of numerous longitudinal
pale brownish-coloured streaks, the appearance of which is
somewhat suggestive of spongin. These streaks are absent
from the columnar spicule-tracts.
Megascleres.—The megascleres are straight cylindrical tylo-
styli of a single kind, with strongylote distal extremity ; size,
400-440 x 4-8 ju.
Microscleres.—The spirasters are fairly straight spicules,
provided with twenty to thirty large spines, which are about
7 # in length. They are plentifully scattered through the
tissues, and form a dense superficial layer 100 to 200 i in
thickness ; the size of the largest is about 40 x 7 pu.
Loc.—East coast of Queensland, twenty-five miles south-
east of Double Island Point, 33 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’)
SPIRASTRELLA PAPILLOSA, Ridley and Dendy.
1887. Spirastrella papillosa, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger’’
Monaxonida, 1887, p. 232, pl. xli.,. fig. 5, ply xlve, figs.
ie ta
The Museum collection contains six speciments of this
species. They vary considerably in shape, but are always
provided with several large apically situated oscula, and in
other respects agree exactly with the description of the type,
except that they do not show any sign of ‘“‘deep longitudinal
wrinkles’? near the apex. The warty appearance of the sur-
face appears to be a constant character.
Locs.—Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fms.
(‘‘Endeavour’’); Port Jackson, New South Wales, 30-35 fms.
(‘‘Challenger’’); Port Jackson, New South Wales, and Port
Phillip, Victoria (Austr. Mus. Coll.).
Genus Latruncu.ia, Bocage.
LATRUNCULIA CONULOSA, sp. nov.
(Plate xxil., fig. 1, and fig. 24.)
Sponge submassive, sessile, with aculeated surface.
Consistency and texture dense, somewhat rubber-like.
No oscula. Surface glabrous, dotted with minute pore-
groups. Main skeleton a _ reticulation of strongly-
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 127
developed, stout fibres composed of styli. Surface conuli,
each forming the centre of a radiate system of slender
fibres. There is a dermal layer of discasters of the larger
kind. Megascles:—Blunt-pointed styli 365 x 11 jt,
together with a few (probably immature) sharp-pointed,
slenderer spicules which attain an equal length. Micro-
scleres :—Discasters of two kinds, of which the larger
form a superficial layer and a packing round the main
fibres, and are also scattered through the ground sub-
stance along with the smaller. The larger are provided
with simple spines, the smaller often with compound
spines, the spines in both cases being arranged in four
whorls, two at either end.
The single specimen consists of a sessile, submassive, erect,
cylindrical main portion, together with a similar but smaller
upgrowth which arises partly from the substratum in con-
tinuity with the base of the former and partly from its side.
The main trunk is 70 mm. in height, and 30 mm. in diameter.
The surface, which is smooth and glabrous, is provided with
numerous spine-like conuli, 1 to 3 mm. in height. There are
no oscula. The surface is closely dotted with minute pore
areas, about .2 mm. in
diameter, and each with
two to four pores. The
texture is dense and com-
pact, the consistency firm
and fairly tough; in both
respects the sponge is
somewhat suggestive of
india-rubber, although, of
course, not so. dense,
homogeneous or elastic.
The colour (in spirits) is
pale brownish-grey. 4
The main skeleton con- :
sists of a very loose reti- os
culation of stout fibres (up
to 400 mm. or more in Fig. 24—Latrunculia conulosa. a
thickness) which are com-_ Styli. b Larger discaster. c Smaller
posed solely of densely discasters.
packed parallel _ styli.
Each surface-conulus forms the apex of a convergent pencil of
fibres, of which the axial or principal fibre only is derived
from the main skeletal reticulation, whilst the remainder—
which are very much slenderer fibres—both begin and termin-
ate at the surface. Probably it would be more correct to say
128 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
of the latter, that they proceed from the apex of the conulus,
and after running inwards, with gradually increasing diver-
gence, for a short distance towards the sponge-interior,
gradually curve round and return again to meet the surface
at varying distances from their starting point—the more cen-
trally situated fibres of the pencil proceeding to a further
distance than the more peripheral. Styli similar to those com-
posing the fibres are sparingly scattered through the tissues
together with discasters of two kinds, a larger and a smaller.
The former are closely aggregated in the immediate surround-
ing of all the main fibres encircling them as a kind of loose
sheath. The cortical skeleton is a layer of closely packed
discasters almost exclusively of the larger kind; it is about
300 to 400 p in thickness.
Megascleres.—These are styli, probably of a single kind—
the stouter with a more or less blunt or rounded distal ex-
tremity, and occasionally becoming almost perfectly stron-
gylote; the slenderest usually -sharply pointed. They are
sometimes elongately subtylote at the basal end, and have a
maximum size of 365 x II y.
Microscleres.—(i.) The larger discasters are stout spicules,
having a short central region devoid of spines, and on
either side of this two more or less distinct whorls of
large spines: those of the terminal whorl projecting
obliquely forwards; those of the sub-terminal, stand-
ing more or less perpendicularly to the spicule-axis.
They are about 4o yt in length (exclusive of spines),
and have a diameter in their spineless central region
of about 12 yw. The spines are 10 to 12 4 long.
The smaller discasters are very variable in form, no
two apparently being quite alike. They are much
slenderer spicules than the preceding, with an elon-
gated spineless central region, and at either end, two
more or less distinct whorls of simple or (more usually)
compound spines, the latter of which are columnar in
form, with a few terminal spinules. The terminal
whorl of spines is often reduced and then appears as
a prolongation of the axis of the spicule. | These
spicules are at most 38 yw in length (inclusive of
spines), and have a diameter centrally of 1 to 4
(rarely more than 2.5 m). The stouter individuals
may represent a third kind of discaster intermediate
between the other two.
(ii.
=
Loc.—North coast of Tasmania, off Devonport. (‘“En-
deavour.’’) .
SPONGES. -HALLMANN. 129
FamiLty POLYMASTIID:.
Genus PotyMastTiA, Bowerbank.
POLYMASTIA CRATICIA, sp. nov.
(Plate xxii., fig. 3, and fig. 25-)
Sponge depressed dome-shaped, sessile, with thick-
walled digitiform tubular processes some of which are
provided with a single apical osculum. Main skeleton
consisting of a fairly dense matrix of scattered spicules
and spicule bundles traversed vertically by fairly stout
distant fibres. The fibres lying immediately beneath the
cortex of the processes comprise an outer series of wavy
fibres running circumferentially and forming an elegant
wickerwork, and of an underlying series of equidistant
longitudinal fibres. The cortex consists of styli arranged
ina dense palisade. Spicules:—These are of three kinds,
vig., fusiform styli of two orders of size which (par-
ticularly the larger) are scarcely distinguishable from
oxea, the larger occurring in the main skeleton, the
smaller in the cortex; and fusiform tylostyli which occur
along with the larger styli scattered through the ground
tissues. The first attain a size of 1200 x 22 p; the second,
350 x 9 Hw; and the last, 200 x 5 W.
The sponge is sub-circular in horizontal outline, broadest at
the base, with a convex upper surface from which numerous
longer or shorter stout digitiform processes arise. Of four
specimens, the two which differ most in their proportions are
respectively 55 x 80 x 50 mm., and 4o x go x 75 mm. in
neight, length and breadth. These two also differ most in the
lengths of their processes, which in the former are never more
than 10 mm. long, in the latter usually between 15 and 30 mm.
The processes are usually tapered to a point and vary from
60 to 80 in number. When, as sometimes is the case, they
are cylindrical and distally rounded, the osculum, if it occurs,
is situated on the summit of a small terminal papilla.
The specimens are preserved in a dry state, and the follow-
ing remarks therefore apply to the sponge in that condition.
The surface is quite smooth to the touch but has a minutely
velvety appearance due to the slightly projecting points of the
densely crowded cortical spicules. Internally the sponge con-
sists of a dense, but rather soft and friable matrix traversed
vertically by fibres about 250 # in stoutness. The fibres are
composed solely of closely packed spicules of the largest kind,
which are fusiform styli closely resembling oxea; the matrix
consists of a disorderly profusion of spicule-bundles and single
130 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Fig. 25— P. craticia.
a Stylus (of the fibres).
b Stylus (of the cortex,
drawn to a larger scale
than the preceding).
c Tylostylus (of the
cortex).
spicules of the same kind together with
smaller tylostyli. The cortical skeleton
proper consists of crowded fusiform sub-
styli arranged perpendicularly to the
surface, but immediately beneath and
closely associated with it is a_ thin
matted layer of mostly horizontally dis-
posed styli of the larger kind. Fibres
from the inner skeleton penetrate into
the cortex, spreading out slightly at
their extremities in a penicillate fashion ;
the terminal spicules of these fibres
usually project slightly at the surface.
The arrangement of the fibres imme-
diately underlying the cortex is one of
marked regularity. In the body of the
sponge, a series of equidistant parallel
fibres running upwards from the base is
most conspicuous, but in the processes,
a series of circumferentially directed
fibres external to these also comes into
prominence. The latter run undulat-
ingly and intercross so as to form a
wickerwork-like structure of very ele-
gant pattern. The specific name has
been bestowed in reference to this
feature.
Spicules.—
(i.) The larger oxea-like styli are
straight, and measure 660-
1200 X 12-22 4.
Gi.) The smaller are usually slightly
curved and more distinctly
stylote ; they range in size from
220 X ©) tO’ 350 x © #-
(iii.) The tylostyli (or subtylostyli)
are fusiform and _ usually
slightly curved. They occur
singly and in small bundles in
the ground substance. Size:
120 X 3 tO 200 X § HL.
Loc.—North coast of New South
Wales, eight miles east of Sandon
Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’)
>
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 121
Famity ASTRAXINELLIDA, Dendy.
Dendy! has suggested the advisability of instituting a new
fa. 1ily—Astraxinellide—for the reception of certain Axinel-
lide which are distinguished by the possession of astrose
microscleres. The Astraxinellide he would place in the divi-
sion Astromonaxonellida, whilst the Axinellide in the
restricted sense would remain in the Sigmatomonaxonellida.
If we could learn all the facts concerning the phylogeny of the
Axinellide it would no doubt be found that, whereas some
have been evolved from Desmacidonid and Haplosclerid
ancestors and some (? e.g., Tvachycladus®) directly from more
primitive sigmatophorous forms, yet a considerable number
have developed along lines of descent which diverge from the
Astrotetraxonid stem. In a natural system of classification
the last-mentioned would be excluded from the Sigmatomon-
axellida, and they would probably require several families for
their reception. Unfortunately, it is impossible in the present
state of our knowledge to determine, in the majority of cases,
to which of the two primary Tetraxonid subdivisions a given
Axinellid genus belongs, and consequently no altogether
satisfactory bipartition of the family is to be expected without
much further enquiry. Nevertheless, there is much to be said
in favor of a removal forthwith from the Axinellidz of such
genera as afford sufficient evidence of their Astrotetraxonid
affinities ; and these might very well be placed provisionally
in a single family, irrespective of any question as to whether
their relationships are close or distant. On this understanding
I feel but slight hesitation in placing under the family Astrax-
inellidee the new genus Paracordyla, which possesses an Axin-
ellid type of skeletal structure and yet has microscleres in the
form of amphiasters.
1 Dendy—Rept. Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, with Rept. Mar.
Biol. Ceylon, Part 3, 1905, p. 107.
2 In this connection, I would suggest that a new family—Spirasigmidze
—be established to include Trachya globosa. Carter (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,
5, Xvil., 1886, p. 121), and its variety, rugosa (Op. cit., xviii. 1886, p. 457),
Gellius aculeatus, Whitelegge (Sponges of Funafuti, Austr. Mus. Mem.,
lii., 5, 1897, p. 326), and perhaps also the genus Trachycladus. For the first-
mentioned of these species Topsent (Mém. Soc. Zool. France, vii., 1894,
p. 8), has already proposed the genus. Trachygellius; for the second I now
propose a new genus Spirasigma. In both of these genera the micro-
scleres resemble the sigmaspires of Trachycladus more closely than they
resemble ordinary sigmata, and the conformation of the skeleton is
strongly suggestive of their derivation from the Tetillide. Of these
species I have examined (only) sections which were prepared by Mr.
Whitelegge—those of TJ. globosa and its variety having been cut from
pieces of British Museum specimens, and that of the latter from its type-
specimen. If the former sections are correctly labelled—and I scarcely
doubt that they are—T. globosa and T’. globosa, var. rugosa are specifically
distinct. Both in Trachygellius and Spirasigma the skeleton has a radial
arrangement recalling that of the Donatiide. In the former the large
diactinal spicules (oxea in the two known species) are accompanied by
sigmata only; in the latter (in which, in the single species, the large
132 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTs.
GENUS PARACORDYLA, gen. nov.
The inner skeleton is a dense columnar aggregation @
large oxea which, in linear outgrowths of the sponge” -
body (if these be present), takes the form of a very com-
pact axial core. Spongin appears to be wholly absent.
The ectosomal skeleton is a dense palisade of vertical
microxea supplemented by ‘‘dermal brushes’’ of styli or
oxea. Between the ectosomal layer and the inner
skeleton-mass is a narrow zone penetrated by canals and
crossed by strands of the large oxea. In addition to
microxea, microscleres in the form of small amphiasters
are present.
The spiculation of this genus is remarkably similar to that
of Scolopes moseleyi, Sollas ;t but since Sollas speaks of fibres
in connection with his species, and remarks that the
general character of its skeleton reminds one forcibly of that
in Carter’s genus T'rachya, there is evidently a distinct generic
difference between Paracordyla and Scolopes. Amongst the
Axinellidae, the genus which makes the nearest approach to
Paracordyla, appears to be Ceratopsis, Thiele.?
PARACORDYLA LIGNEA, sp. nov.
\
(Platerxxi, fie: 2) and figss 20.277)
Sponge sessile, with a massive body from which
branch-like elongations may arise. Consistency, owing
to the enormous development of the spicules, very dense
and solid. Surface even, pilose. Oscula wanting. The
skeleton of the whole of the inner mass of the sponge to
within a few millimetres of the surface is formed of closely
aggregated large oxea, with a general parallel arrange-
ment, which, in the branch- like parts, form an almost
solid core. Between the core and the superficial layer
(cortex) is @ narrow zone, 2 to 3 mm. wide, crossed by
strands of similar oxea, the outer spicules of which pro-
ject well beyond the surface. The surface is also pro-
tected by brushes of shorter spicules varying in form from
styli to oxea. The canals of the subcortical sone are
surrounded by radially disposed microxea, and similar
spicules, together with minute amphiasters, are scattered
through the ground substance. Megascleres :—(i.) Oxea
of the main skeleton reaching a size of 3200 x 50 qt; (il.)
styli and asymmetrical oxea of the dermal brushes vary-
ing in length from less than 200 to about 7oo jt, with
spicules of the fibres are substrongyla) there are in addition scattered
small oxea. If in Spirasigma aculeata the fibre-forming strongyla dis-
appeared, the species would, without doubt, owing to the mode of dis-
tribution of its smaller oxea, be classed as a Gellius.
1 Sollas—‘‘Challenger” Tetraxonida, 1885, p. 432, pl. xliii., figs. 1-9.
2 Thiele—Studien uber pazifische spongien, Zoologica, Heft 24, 1898, p. 56.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN.
33
maximum diameter of 1S py. Microscleres :—(i.) Mi-
croxea, 100 to 140 pw in length by about 4 jt in diameter;
(ii.) amphiasters, 4 to 5 yw long.
The single specimen is a moderately
large, massive, sessile sponge, of great
density and solidity, with a rounded
cuboidal or sub-globose body which
measures about 120 mm. in each of its
three principal directions. From the
marginal region of the somewhat flat-
tened upper surface of the main body
there are given off, at sub-equal dis-
tances, three stout branch-like pro-
cesses, 100 to 150 mm. in length. One
of these is cylindrical, the others are
club-shaped and are polytomously
divided at their extremities into in-
cipient branches. The specimen, which
has been longitudinally bisected, is, with
the exception of one of its processes,
preserved in a dry state. The contrac-
tion resulting from drying has caused
the surface to split in places, giving rise
to a number of shallow gaping fissures,
such as are occasioned under similar
circumstances in many Axinellids. The
surface of the dried portion somewhat
resembles short-piled velvet, both in
appearance and to the touch; that of
the spirit piece has a harsher feeling.
The colour of the former is yellowish-
white, both externally and internally ;
the latter is similarly tinted, except
superficially, where to a depth of about
one-third of a millimetre, it exhibits an
intense purple colouration which, how-
ever, is almost certainly a stain derived
from crinoids originally preserved in the
same liquid. The texture, as revealed
by the cut surface resulting from the
bisection of the specimen, bears a close
resemblance to that of some coarse and
exceedingly short-grained hardwood.
The densely packed spicules are visible
to the naked eye, and throughout the
entire central mass of the sponge have
i
| '
| i
a
Fig. 26—P. lignea.
a Oxea (showing the
spicule’s extremities.and
its diameter relatively
to that of the other
spicules). b Styli (of
the dermal brushes). c¢
Microxea.
134 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
an approximately parallel arrangement. (The general struc-
ture and arrangement of the skeleton were examined micro-
scopically only in the branch-like processes; the following
description 1s drawn from a rather thick median longitudinal
section of one of such preserved in alcohol. Owing to the
great development of spicules and their disposition, the pre-
paration of a transverse section would be wholly impossible
without desilicification. The structure of the main body of
the sponge is apparently not essentially different from that
described for the processes).
Fig. 27—Faracordylalignea. Vertical section, show-
ing the arrangement of the skeleton in the cortical
and subcortical region.
Superficially, there is a fairly well-defined layer, about 150
in thickness, densely packed with perpendicular microxea
which appear to project about half their length beyond the
surface. In addition, the surface is provided with brushes of
fusiform styli and oxea, of much shorter length than the
spicules composing the main skeleton. The components of a
single bundle diverge from a point close beneath the cortex.
With the exception of a sub-cortical zone about two or three
millimetres wide the whole of the interior of the branch-like
process is occupied by an almost solid core of longitudinally-
SPONGES.—HALLMANN.
135
lisposed large oxea. The sub-cortical zone is crossed at clos
aisposed large Oxea. qe sub-cortical zone 1s Crossed at Close
intervals by slightly penicillate fascicles of similar spicules,
which give support to: the cortical layer. The innermost
spicules of these bundles emerge from between the spicules of
the core; the outermost project for a considerable distance
beyond the surface. ‘here are thus three orders of projecting
spicules at the surface. ‘The inter-fascicular spaces of the
subcortical. zone are filled-in with soft tissues containing
scattered spicules and traversed by canals which in cross-
section show a circular outline and a surrounding whorl of
radially-disposed microxea. The largest canals occur in the
deeper parts of the zone, and may attain a diameter of .6 mm.
In the immediate neig hbourhood of the cortex, the canals are
of capillary dimensions, and the microxea-—w hich presumably
surround them—are so closely and coniusedly intermingled,
that the precise inner limit of the cortex is very often difficult
of determination.
Megascleres.—
(i.) The oxea of the inner skeleton are straight or only
slightly curved symmetrical fusiform spicules attain-
ing a size of 3200 x 50 #. They are usually much more
than 1000 jt long, but spicules of all lengths between
these larger oxea and the dermal oxea occur, and
(since the asymmetry of the latter is sometimes in-
appreciable) consequently no actual lower limit can
be assigned to their size. Abnormalities of these
spicules in the shape of styli of only about one-half
their length are of extremely rare occurrence
(ii.) The fusiform styli and (usually asymmetrical) oxea,
which form the dermal brushes and are also to be
found in small number scattered in the subcortical
zone, range in length from somewhat less than 200
to slightly more than 700 #1; the largest may attain
a diameter of 18 It. All intermediate grades of form
between styli and oxea occur.
Microscleres.—
(i.) The microxea are similar in form to the largest oxea,
but are about twice as stout in proportion to their
length. They are rarely less than 100 #1, or more
than 140 » long, and attain a diameter of slightly
more than 4 pt. Occasionally spicules intermediate
in size between these and the shortest dermal oxea
are met with, but appear to belong rather to the latter
category.
ww
136 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
(ii.) The amphiasters! bear at either end a terminal whorl of
about six to eight rays which stand almost perpen-
dicularly to the sete or are directed forwards at a
small angle (up to 30°, say). The width of the spicule
between the tips oF the rays, measures from about
three-fourths of, to slightly less than the length of
the spicule, which is rarely as much as 5 #.
Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of San-
don Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’)
Famity DESMACIDONIDA.
Whether the Desmacidonide be divided into two sub-
families, Mycaline and Ectyonine, in the usual way; or
whether, in accordance with Topsent’ S proposal, the Myca-
linee be sub-divided so as to yield an additional sub-family, the
Dendoricinee—the result, if a natural grouping of the genera
be our aim, is not altogether satisfactory. Of the two, Top-
sent’s classification is the better since, with very few excep-
tions as their microscleres show, the genera w hich remain in
the Mycalinze after the removal of the Dendoricine stand well
apart from the rest of the family. The main fault lies in the
artificiality of the distinction upon which the separation of the
Ectyoninee and Dendoricine is based. Species are placed in
one or the other of these sub-families according as spicules of
one particular kind—the accessory spicules—are present or
absent, whilst no value at all is placed upon the presence or
absence of the equally important ‘‘skeletal’? and ‘‘dermal’’
spicules, nor any notice taken of the plain indications afforded
by the microscleres. As a consequence, we have closely allied
if not almost identical genera like Ectyodoryx and Lissoden-
doryx, Ectyomyxilla and Myxilla, Pocillon and lophon, Hyme-
trochota and lotrochota placed, the one in the Ectyonine, the
other in the Dendoricine, whilst on the other hand wholly un-
related species like those of [Vilsonella and Clathria are put in
a single genus without question or comment. Under these
circumstances there is no advantage in maintaining these sub-
divisions, and I propose therefore to merge the Dendoricin:e
and Ectyoninz in a single sub-family, to be called the Myxil-
line. It is probable that the My xillinge are capable of sub-
division into two fairly natural groups in the way suggested
below, but on this question I prefer to reserve judgment. I
would, however, venture the opinion that the Myxilline are
derived from a single stem distinct from that from which the
great majority of the Mycaline have sprung, and from this
point of view will enter upon a brief discussion of the sub-
family.
1 Not Laine cnocesded in ine out the details of the structure of
this spicule, I have not attempted to figure it. The rays appear to be
often bifurecate and to have at times a slightly tuberculated surface.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. :
w
eT
SUB-FAMILY MYXILLINA.
The preponderance of evidence is in favour of the supposi-
tion that the most primitive Myxilline possessed a type of
organisation closely resembling that which obtains in Certain
existing genera such as Leptosia, Hymenancora, Hymetro-
chota and Hymeraphia ; and it is possible, in accordance there-
with, to imagine a common ancestral form, or hypothetical
‘*Promyxilline,’’ characterised by the following features :—The
sponge grew in the form of a thin encrustment, and produced
in contact with the substratum a basal layer of spongin echi-
nated by erect acanthostylote spicules which acted as pillars
for the support of the soft structures. These spicules (which
for convenience will be termed the basical megascleres) ex-
hibited a tendency to differentiate into two kinds, a less spiny
larger, and a more spiny smaller kind, and this was probably
associated with an accompanying tendency towards an ar-
rangement of the spicules in clusters, in each of which larger
individuals were surrounded by smaller. Megascleres of a
second kind, smooth and probably monactinal, were also
present, these (which may be distinguished as auxiliary
megascleres) occurred, without definite arrangement, more
particularly in the superficial layers of the ‘sponge, and also
formed descending strands stretching towards the sponge-
base. Shonen fibres were not produced, but the pri-
mordia of such, in the form of low dome- shaped elevations
of the basal hoe lamina, coinciding in position with the
areas occupied by the spicule- clusters, had probably made their
appearance. It is difficult to say what the microscleres were,
but since cheloids, sigmata, toxa and rhaphides (often in drag-
mata) are found in the group, it is necessary to assume that
these, or at least the forms from which they have been derived,
were present.
From such a hypothetical form all the different types of
Myxillinee are capable of being derived.
The evidence afforded by the microscleres, considered in
conjunction with other facts, indicates either that a consider-
able amount of evolution in various directions had been ac-
complished, and that the prototypes of quite a number of
different groups of co-related genera had already come into
existence prior to the origin of sponginous fibres and to the
1 These spicules are commonly known as “dermal” or ‘“ectosomal”’
megascleres; but the part which they play in the conformation of the
skeleton varies to such an extent in different genera that it is advisable
in a comparative treatment to designate them by a term unsuggestive of
position or function. The term ‘auxiliary’ is not altogether an appro-
priate one, but it will suit the present purpose; the spicules to which it
applies correspond for the most part, in the Myxilline, to the megascleres
which Bowerbank included under the same name. I shall apply the
epithet ‘dermal’ only to those spicules, of whatever category, which
are specially concerned in the formation of a dermal skeleton.
138 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
assumption of an erect habit of growth, or that a return to a
primitive condition on the part of more or less highly evolved
species has occurred again and again within the group; other-
wise it is impossible to account for the existence of groups of
gener g. Hymeraphia, Microciona, Clathria and: O phlita-
See gs a, Stylostichon, Ectyodoryx and Lissoden-
doryx; Hymenancora, Plumohalichondria, Ectyomyxilla and
Myxilla; Dragmatyle, Tedania and Acheliderma ; and others—
each of which comprises a natural series connecting ‘‘promyx-
illine’’ with Ectyonine and Dendoricine forms. Whilst it is
probable that each of the two possible explanations contains
some portion of the truth, it would seem that the former is
more satisfactorily in accord with the bulk of the evidence,
although it involves the assumption that, amongst the My xil-
linge, sponginous fibres have originated independently many
times over. If, however, as is scarcely to be doubted, such
fibres have arisen as linear upgrowths of the basal spongin-
lamina, there is no great improbability in such an assumption
provided that there already existed in the common ancestor an
incipient tendency, such as has been postulated, towards fibre-
formation.
Taking into account only those features which belong to the
skeleton, but neglecting, for the time being, any considerations
in reference to the microscleres, it may be said that nearly all
of the diversities of spiculation and structure which occur in
the Myxilline are ascribable to (a) modifications in the form of
the megascleres and the division of either or both of the origi-
nal groups of megascleres into two or more kinds; (b)
differences in the arrangement and constitution of the fibres,
and in connection therewith different combinations of the
megascleres in respect to their particular location in the skele-
ton; or (c) the loss by atrophy of one or more groups of megas-
cleres formerly present.
Of very common occurrence has been the differentiation of
the basical megascleres into two kinds, a larger, in the case of
which the primitive spination has usually undergone partial
reduction or become entirely lost, and a smaller, in which it has
almost invariably been retained; these may be distinguished
as principal and accessory basical megascleres respectively, or
simply as ‘‘principals’’ and ‘‘accessories.’’ The resultant tri-
megascleric condition is that which is characteristic of normal
“Ectyonine.’ ’ In many Myxilline, however, the “‘basicals’’
are only incompletely differentiated ‘and in such cases, unless
(as in Crella) there be a determinable difference of function
between the spicules which lie at one end of the series and those
which lie at the other, it is difficult to decide whether they
should-be regarded as belonging to one or to two groups (e.g.
species of Stylostichon, Clathrissa, etc. ). The maximum
-_——
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 139
degree of differentiation between principal and accessory spic-
ules appears to have been attained in genera like Raspailia and
Echinodictyum and in those in which the microscleres are
isochelze palmate and toxa, though amongst the last-men-
tioned there are species (vide Clathria caelata, sp. n.) in which
an unbroken transition of spicule forms occurs between the
small echinating spined ‘‘accessories’’ and the large (often
quite smooth) principal styli of the fibre-core. Finally, in a
third group of genera, comprising the ‘‘Dendoricinz’’ and
certain ‘‘Ectyonine’’ (e.g., Ophlitaspongia, Echinoclathria,
Wilsonella, Agelas, etc.) the basical spicules are unequivocally
of but a single kind. The iogical conclusion with regard to
these is that either a differentiation of their basical spicules has
never occurred or that one or the other of the resultants of such
a differentiation has subsequently disappeared in the course of
evolution ; in most cases, the probability is that the absence of
a second kind is due to loss, inasmuch as the (basical) spicules
actually present, usually exhibit, in the matter of form and
function, features which are more characteristic either of prin-
cipal megascleres or of accessory. The further consideration
of the spicules renders it necessary to take into account other
features of the skeleton, and particularly the fibres.
In the Myxilline: skeletal fibres have originated in apparently
two quite independent ways, viz., by the upgrowth of processes
from the basal lamina, and by the ‘‘ingrowth’’ of strands of
auxiliary spicules from the superficial layer. In many cases,
however, the fibres are the product of both modes of forma-
tion. Fibres which are wholly or partly of basal origin are,
with possible exceptions, more or less sponginous and traverse
‘the whole extent of the sponge; those of purely superficial
origin are, at the most, scantily provided with spongin and
proceed from the surface (usually?) only for a short distance
(as, for example in ‘‘Echinodictyum”’ arenosum, “‘ Plumohali-
chondria’? gravida and Fusifer fistulatus).1| The former might
be distinguished as basifugal, the latter as basipetal fibres.
The mode of origination of basifugal fibres in the Myxilline
is capable of being explained as follows :—The spongoblasts
(and probably also the ‘‘basical’’ scleroblasts) which primi-
tively—it may be presumed—were uniformly distributed over
the surface of the basal lamina, became at particular points on
it more closely aggregated. The consequent more rapid de-
position of spongin at these points produced at each of them
a thickening of the lamina which gradually assumed the
form, say, of a papilla. Scattered over the surface of this
papilla, just as over other portions of the surface of the
lamina, though perhaps more closely, were scleroblasts
1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, ix. (n.s.), 1897.
140 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
producing echinatingly-disposed basical megascleres. As
a final step the cells, which, by their proliferation, main-
tain the supply of spongoblasts and_ scleroblasts, became
localised at the extremity of the papilla, the further growth of
which was thereby limited to increase in length. The manner
of growth of the fibre might accordingly be likened to that of
a Phanerogam stem—the spongoblast- and scleroblast-produc-
ing cells of the former corresponding to the apical meriste-
matic cells of the latter, and the spicules, like the leaves,
developing in acropetal succession. Thus at every stage of
growth the fibre would be surmounted at its extremity by a
‘‘tuft’’? of newly-formed basical spicules, and it would depend
almost solely upon the initial orientation of these spicules with
regard to the direction of growth of the fibre, and their precise
location (whether at the extreme tip of the fibre or subtermin-
ally) whether they subsequently became wholly enveloped by
the onwardly developing spongin as coring spicules or whether,
being more or less perpendicularly disposed, they were left
with only their bases imbedded in spongin, as echinating spi-
cules. When the fibre-forming spicules are of a single kind
the attempt to draw a distinction between coring and echinat-
ing spicules is, to a great extent, artificial, and usually breaks
down in practice ; as a matter of fact the spicules at the time of
their formation at the growing-point of the fibre are, in a
sense, all of them echinating. Accordingly Ophlitaspongia
and Echinoclathria which, by common agreement, were placed
in the ‘‘Ectyonine,’’ should logically have been included in the
‘“Dendoricine.’”’
The foregoing remarks concerning the mode of origin and
formation of basifugal fibres apply more particularly to those
of which the constituent spicules are basical megascleres only.
Although fibres of this kind are the rule, there are a number of
genera in which auxiliary spicules also participate in their
formation and some again in which these are the only fibre-
forming spicules. In these exceptional cases we may consider
either that the ascending sponginous fibres have come into
association with, and have enveloped in their progress the
‘“descending”’ (basipetal) strands of auxiliary spicules 31 or that
in connection with the formation of the fibres, ‘‘auxiliary’’
scleroblasts have come to take a regular place amongst the
cells of the fibre-growing point. From the point of view of
spicular constitution merely, the skeletal fibres of the Myxil-
line are referable to three main types, according as basical
megascleres only, basical and auxiliary both, or auxihary
megascleres only, take part in their formation.
1 In_ Aulosvongus. tubulatus, Bowbk. (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1873, p. 29; Dendy,
Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (6), iii., 1889, p. 29), the fibres appear to grow up in
an analagous way around the tubes of commensal worms.
SPONGES.--HALLMANN. IAI
This introduces an interesting point in connection with the
megascleres, viz., their versatility in respect to the different
parts they play in different genera in the conformation of the
skeleton ; and it also raises the question as to the nature of the
criteria at our disposal for determining, in a given species, to
which category—principal, accessory or auxiliary—the megas-
cleres of each kind belong. According to my interpretation,
if we take into account only the situation of the megascleres,
the following types of skeleton are, amongst others, dis-
tinguishable :—
I.—The spicules of the fibres are ‘‘basicals’’ of one or two
kinds; the ‘‘auxiliaries,’’ if (as is almost invariably the case)
present, occur interstitially and dermally.
(a) The ‘‘basicals’’ are of two kinds, both of which occur
in connection with the fibres.
(i1.) The fibres are cored by ‘“‘principals’’ and echinated
by “‘accessories.’’ Normal ‘‘Ectyonine.”’
(ii.) Both kinds of “‘basicals’’ are longitudinally dis-
posed in the fibres. ‘‘Clathria’’ chartacea (vide
remarks on Clathria); Heteroclathria.
(b) The ‘‘basicals’’ are scarcely or not at all differentiated
into two groups, and echinating spicules, if present, are not
distinguishable in form from the directive spicules ; or either
the one kind or the other of the “‘principal’’ and ‘‘acces-
sory’’ groups has been lost by atrophy.
(ii.) The ‘“‘basicals’’ are imperfectly differentiated.
Stylostichon.
(iv.) “‘Accessories’’ are absent. Normal ‘‘Dendori-
cine,’’? Ophlitaspongia, Echinoclathria.
(wins Principals’; are. absent» ~ Clathria*’ mollrs:+
Paramyxilla infrequens.?
I1.—The spicules composing the fibres comprise both ‘“‘basi-
cals’’ and ‘‘auxiliaries ;’’ the latter, which are situated axially
in the fibres also occur interstitially or dermally.
(vi.) Principal and accessory spicules are well distin-
guished, and both kinds are associated with the
fibres. ‘‘Echinodictyum”’ ridleyi (p. 151).
1 Kirkpatrick—Marine Investigations in South Africa, ii., 1904, p. 249.
2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), vii., 1881, 369; Dendy—Report Pearl
Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, ili., 1805, p p. 233.
142 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
(vii.) Principal and accessory spicules are more or less
well distinguished ; the former echinate the fibres,
the latter are interstitial and dermal. Crella.
(vili.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are scarcely or not at all differ-
entiated into two kinds or are represented only by
accessory spicules. Clathrissa, Plumohalichondria,
Stylotellopsis, JWilsonella, Fusifer, ‘‘Echino-
dictyum’’ spongiosum,! *‘E.”’ arenosum,} ‘‘ Micro-
ciona’’ scabida (p. 150).
(ix.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are represented only by principal
spicules. Echinochalina.
I11.—The fibre-forming spicules are ‘‘auxiliaries’’ only ;
basical spicules, if present, are (so far as known) of a single
kind, and, on account of their spination, appear to belong
rather to the category of accessory than of principal mega-
scleres.
(x.) Basical megascleres are present. Pseudoclathria
Grayella, Histodermella, Microtylotella.
(xi.) Auxiliary megascleres only are present. Species
of JIotrochota and Melonanchora, and_ certain
species included in the Mycalinee.
In the case of those Myxilline in which the megascleres are
of three kinds, the homologies of the spicules are, as a rule,
obvious; and almost invariably it is found that the directive or
axial spicules of the fibres belong to the principal, the echinat-
ing spicules to the accessory, and the interstitial or dermal to
the auxiliary category of megascleres. When this mode of
arrangement of the spicules obtains, or when it is departed
from only through the loss of accessory spicules, the skeleton
might be described as being of the normal type, since it is that
in particular which is characteristic of most Myxilline.
Amongst ‘‘trimegascleric’’ genera, Crella is exceptional in the
fact that in it the fibres are cored by auxiliary and echinated by
principal megascleres whilst the accessory occur extra-fibrally.
From a study of the different forms assumed by the spicules
(both megascleres and microscleres) amongst the normal Myx-
illinae, we obtain much information Sich is of service in
enabling us to form a conclusion concerning the identity of the
megascleres i in cases where the skeleton is ‘of an anomalous or
aberrant type. Thus there can be absolutely no doubt that the
‘‘skeletal’’ spicules of Melonanchora emphysema, Forcepia
1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii., 1896, p. 50.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 143
colonensis,4 lotrochota coccinea? and of other species which
might be mentioned, are auxiliary megascleres, and that they
therefore differ from normal species of their respective genera
in the absence of principal megascleres; and since we are en-
abled to detect the relationships of these species only by reason
of the marked peculiarities of their microscleres, it is extremely
probable that a number of the species included in certain My-
caline genera (e.g., Desmacidon, Amphilectus, Esperiopsis and
Batzella) are similarly derived from various Myxillinee which
are lacking in striking microscleric characters. Further, one
feels scarcely any hesitation in asserting that the dermal spi-
cules of Pseudociathria, Crella and Grayella, and the scattered
spined diactinal sprcules of Histodermella, are accessory or,
at any rate, undifferentiated basical megascleres; whilst the
peculiar forms assumed by the accessory spicules in certain
species of Icarnus, e.g., by the ‘‘cladotylostyles”’ of A. tortilis$
and the cladotylota of A. tenuis4 lead one to suspect that the
microtylota of Microtylotella giintheri belong to the same cate-
gory, and that this genus ought therefore to be given a place
in the vicinity of Acarnus. Also, it is not altogether improb-
able that the spined forcipes of Leptobasis and Forcepia are
derivatives of accessory megascleres; the larger forcipes of
L. arcuata5 are especially suggestive of such a derivation,
and it is worthy of notice also that in the genera Crella, Gray-
ella and Histodermella, which, like Forcepia and Leptobasis,
possess chele arcuate, the scattered accessory spicules are
frequently curved and diactinal. If the megascleres other than
the accessory are of a single kind only, it is not always pos-
sible to decide with certainty whether they are principal or
auxiliary spicules; as a rule, however, reasons can be found,
depending upon their form, in support of their identification
with one, rather than with the other, of these categories.
Principal megascleres, in nearly all cases in which their identity
is certain, are sub-conical or more or less fusiform, somewhat
curved styli, which are either quite smooth or are provided
with spines over a greater or less portion of their length ex-
tending from the basal extremity upwards. The auxiliary
megascleres, on the other hand, are typically straight and of
fairly uniform diameter, and are rarely spined except at their
extremities ; in comparison with the principal spicules they are
of relatively slender proportions, and in most genera are typi-
cally diactinal in the fully developed state, with usually tornote,
1 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xv., 1885, p. 110. For this species
Hentschel (1911) has recently proposed a new name, IL’. Michaelsent.
2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xviii., 1886, p. 378; Dendy—Proc. Roy.
Soc. Vict., viii (n.s.), 1896, p. 23.
3 Topsent—Résultats Camp. Scient. Pr. de Monaco, Fasc. xxv., 1904,
Dp. Lis ple xive, file. 8:
4 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii., (n.s.), 1896, p. 50.
5 Topsent—Op. cit., p. 183, pl. xv., fig. 18b.
144 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
strongylote or tylote extremities. One is inclined to think,
therefore —in regard to those genera included in the Mycalinz
which afford reason for believing that they are degraded Myx-
illinee—that the megascleres of typical species of Desmacidon
and Homeodictya are homologous with principal spicules
whilst in some species at least which have been assigned to
the same genera and to Amphilectus and Batzella they are
homologous with auxiliary megascleres.t The presence or
absence of spination on the principal spicules has been found
lacking in generic value, and everything points to the fact that
the spined condition is the more primitive; it is perhaps not a
rare occurrence in species in which they are smooth when fully
mature, that they are spined in their early developmental stages
(as, for example, in Myxilla diversianc -orata?), or during the
larval period of life of the sponge (as in Myxilla pedunculata’).
It is a peculiar circumstance that the principal megascleres are
almost invariably curved; exceptions to the rule are provided
by Raspailia and its allies, but it is significant that these are
also aberrant in other respects. In Ec thinodictyum and Tri-
kentrion amongst the ‘‘Ectyonine,’’ and in Dendoricella and
some species of other genera (e.g., lotrochota) amongst the
‘“Dendoricine,’’ they are diactinal (as in Desmacidon and
Homeeodictya), and take the form of oxea or strongyla; yet
they still exhibit the curvature and fusiformity which, in
general, are characteristic of principal megascleres.
Certain Myxillinze are possessed of more than three
kinds of megascleres owing to the division of one or
more of the primary groups into two kinds; and _ this
division usually appears to be correlated with, and to have
been the outcome of a performance by the spicules concerned
of two different functions. Instances of such, in which the
principal megascleres have undergone division, are provided by
Echinodictyum clathratum4 and species of Ra spailia (enone
vamosa, Mont., and R. tenuis, R. and D.); and in w Pea the
‘“accessories’’ have undergone division by the species of Plo-
camia. That the ‘‘dumbbell’’ spicules of the last-named genus
are derivatives of the accessory megascleres, the indication
afforded by P. plena® leaves scarcely any room to doubt; and
this species also, by reason of its possession of stunted ab-
normal forms of the principal megascleres, renders it probable
1 Examples of such are provided by Homaodictya dendyi (Whit.); Des-
macidon nlicatum (=D. stelliderma, Carter); D. psammodes and
Ratzella inaequalis. (Hentschel, Fauna Sudwest- Australiens, Bd. iii.,
1911); and by
Sed
in short strands. In other respects the main skeleton agrees
with that of the preceding species, C. c@lata; that is to say,
the principal styli of the fibres are arranged more or less semi-
plumosely and frequently assume the attitude of echinating
spicules ; the superficial transverse fibres are closely echinated
on their outer aspect by both accessory and principal styli;
and, finally, the principal and accessory megascleres are con-
nected by a series of spicules of intermediate form. The
passage between the two kinds of megascleres is, however,
more abrupt than in C. c@lata, and transitional forms are
rarely met with except amongst the spicules which echinate
the superficial fibres. In two respects the species differs
markedly from C. celata; firstly, in the absence of tricurvate
toxa; and, secondly, in the presence of a well-developed dermal
skeleton in the form of a thin layer of closely packed hori-
zontally-disposed auxiliary subtylostyli, which in the dry state
forms a whitish incrustation similar in appearance to that
shown by species of Rhaphidophlus.
Megascleres.—
(1.) The principal styli are curved or (less frequently)
straight subconical smooth spicules, varying in length
from about 120 to 300 and in diameter up to 10;
the stoutest are usually those of intermediate length,
say from 220 to 250. The shortest often exhibit a
slight degree of ruggedness or other surface in-
equality, which rarely extends for more than a short
distance from the basal extremity and is seldom met
with in individuals of greater length than 160. A
certain proportion show a slight basal knob marked
off by a faint constriction ; this i is of relatively larger
size in smaller and slenderer individuals, which are
then subtylostyli sometimes scarcely distinguishable
from the shorter auxiliary spicules.
(ii.) The accessory acanthostyles are straight or slightly
curved subconical spicules occasionally with a slight
basal knob. In length, they range from 4o to 120 4
though usually less than 90. Individuals above
1007 long are comparatively rare, and are inter-
mediate in form between the accessory spicules proper
and the principal spicules. The accessory spicules
proper are minutely spined over their whole length or,
like those of intermediate form, are merely rugged.
(iii.) The auxiliary subtylostyli (or, less frequently, simple
styli) are straight or curved spicules, v arying in length
from less ne 160 to 380} and in diameter up
to 6p.
218 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Microscleres.—
These are of one kind only, viz., long very slender, hair-like
sinuous spicules of indefinite form, which are undoubtedly
modified toxa. They are scattered singly and are moderately
abundant, and may attain a length of (at least) 260 p. ;
ifoc.——Bast 1coastanot ) blindegslslande: sBass a Strat
(‘‘Endeavour’’).
CLATHRIA RUBENS, Lendenfeld.
(Plate xxaut) tio sis and aes 4s.)
1888. Thalassodendron rubens, var. dura (pars), Lendenfeld,
Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 223.
Thalassodendron rubens, var. lamella (pars), Lenden-
feld, Loc. cit.
4go1. Clathria rubens (pars), Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus.,
Ven 25 PP) O5n CO» Pl. Xie, fg. 13:
(Thalassodendron rubens), Whitelegge, Loc. cit., p. 86.
Sponge profusely rvamose, stipitate, branching poly-
tomously with anastomosis. Branches cylindrical except
at nodes. ‘‘Asterisks’’ (of radiately-disposed grooves),
sometimes associated each with a conical process, occur
at intervals over the otherwise even surface. Dermal
membrane very thin, indistinct; containing scattered
horizontally-lying (auxiliary) spicules. Main skeleton an
irregular reticulation of well-developed horny fibres, all
of which contain slender axial spicules (principal styli).
those in the main fibres arranged in a fairly compact thin
core. Principal styli of stouter proportions than those
within the fibres, occur sporadically as echinating spicules
and are scattered interstitially along with a few (auxiliary)
tylostyli. Accessory (echinating and scattered) acantho-
styles ave somewhat scarce, and spicules occur (although
rather rarely) which are intermediate in form between
them and the principal styli. Megascleres :—(i.) Principal
styli (proper), straight, smooth, subfusiform, rarely 165
x ro p; (ii) accessory acanthostyli (proper), small-
spined, rarely 80 x 6 pt; (iti.) auxiliary subtylostyli, 170 x
3.5 #. Microscleres :—(i.) Scarce isochele palmate, 5-
12 w long; (ii.) slender toxa of characteristic form, 160 to
260 yp long.
SPONGES._HALLMANN. 219
Introductory Remarks.—I have already pointed out (p. 179)
that the two sponges (ser three as W hitelegge supposed)
described by Lendenfeld under the name of Thalassodendron
rubens and ‘distinguished as varieties dura and lamella respec-
tively, belong to different species, and that in their original
descriptions the two were confused. This I have been enabled
to establish owing to the fortunate circumstance that the
actual specimen figured by Lendenfeld under the latter name is
still in existence. ahs specimen, strangely enough, is labelled,
in Dr. Lendenfeld’s handwriting, ‘ ‘Thalassodendron rubens,
var. dura;’’ and thus it appears certain that the name dura
was purely a manuscript one used in connection with the latter
variety, and that its application to the former, for which it is
extremely inappropriate, was due to inadvertence. Luckily,
however, there are nomenclatural reasons why this name
should be rejected.
Description.—The sponge is profusely ramose and attains to
a considerable size. Its chief external characteristics lie in the
mode of branching and in the occurrence at irregular intervals
over its surface of stellate groove-groups (‘‘asterisks’’).
The branches, which in their internodal portions are—
roughly speaking —cylindrical (6 to 12 mm. in diameter) or
only slightly compressed, become at intervals much broadened,
forming nodes of more or less triangular shape. The forma-
tion of such a node is almost inv ariably followed by a division
of the branch into a number (two to five or more) of secondary
branches. The secondary’ branches arise from the distal side
of the nodal region either on the same level or consecutively in
close succession; the mode of branching might in either case
—though less correctly so in the latter—be described as poly-
tomous. The resultants of any one polytomy, but usually not
of successive polytomies, lie in the same plane. Owing to the
rapid multiplication of branches in this way, the transverse
dimensions of the sponge increase rapidly upwards. The
branches are usually crooked, and this, in conjunction with
their frequent anastomoses tends to bring about the formation
of a tangled and reticulate mass in which the mode of branch-
ing may become more or less obscured. The ‘‘asterisks’’
—groups of radiately-disposed, shallow, sharply-incised fur-
rows—occur chiefly on the more compressed parts of the
‘branches; as a rule their centre-points lie on or near the
margins of the branches. Quite commonly the central region
of the area occupied by such a group is raised up into a con.
spicuous conical process, to the apex of which the grooves
ascend. ‘The number of furrows which arrive at the centre of
an asterisk varies from about six to ten; each of these main
furrows usually results from the confluence of a number of
220 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
tributary furrows. Often, a single furrow is continuous be-
tween the centres of two adjoining asterisks. That some
special significance attaches to these furrows is indicated by
the occurrence along them of ‘‘pores”’ of distinctly larger size
than any to be found elsewhere on the surface. Although
I
Fig. 45— Clathria rubens. a Principal styles.
b Auxiliary styles. ec Acanthostyles. d Chela.
e Toxa.
these ‘‘pores’’ are probably exhalant openings, it would
appear (from a single specimen rather imperfectly preserved
in alcohol) that, in the living condition, they are roofed over
by dermal membrane
The largest specimen—that which is figured herein—
measures 450 mm. in height and 250 x 130 mm. in its greatest
transverse dimensions. ‘The older portions of the sponge are
SPONGES..-HALLMANN. eon
firm and tough, and of compact texture; the younger portions
are fine-textured, and, in the dry sponge, of almost silky soft-
ness. She colour in Bicone is dark brown; in the dry state
it varies from greyish yellow to brown.
As seen under moderately low powers of the microscope,
the main skeleton, except in the vicinity of the surface of the
sponge, bears a striking resemblance to that of a Chalinine
sponge. This is mainly due to the comparatively small size
and only moderate abundance of the spicules; to the agerega-
tion of the intrafibral spicules into a well-defined axial core ;
and to the fewness of the echinating acanthostyles. Generally
speaking, the skeleton reticulation consists chiefly of closely
approximated and frequently inosculating longitudinal main
fibres, which contain a somewhat meagre, fairly compact
spicular core, and are joined at irregular intervals by short
usually unispicular connecting fibres.
In the superficial parts of the sponge-branches, however,
the pattern of the skeleton is of a somewhat different char-
acter. Thus, the “‘excurrent’’ main fibres (i.e., those which run
obliquely outwards to the surface of the branches) become
somewhat widely separated as the surface is approached, and
between them the connecting fibres form an interreticulation
or plexus. Moreover, the spicules of these main fibres become
reduced in number and more dispersed, whilst those of the
connecting fibres increase in number. The distinction between
main and connecting fibres consequently tends to become
obscure, and the general pattern of the skeleton approaches
that which is characteristic rather of Myxilla. It is to be noted
also that the fibral spicules (principal styli) of this portion of
the skeleton are of distinctly stouter proportions than those
which core the main fibres of the interior.
Irrespective of this contrast between its inner and outer por-
tions, the skeleton may yet present quite different appearances
in different parts of the sponge, ow ing to disparity in the stout-
ness of fibres. Thus, in the denser parts-—especially in the
internodal regions of the branches—the fibres are composed
chiefly of spongin and may attain a diameter of 80 jt; whilst
in the younger portions of the spong e—especially in the nodal
regions of the branches—spongin is much reduced in amount
—often to such an extent that it forms but a scarcely percep-
tible sheath enclosing the spicules—and even the stoutest
fibres may be less than 20 y in diameter. There is in this
connection a further difference also, due to the fact that those
fibres which are deficient in spongin likewise show a reduction
in the number of their axial spicules. In regions of greater
density, accordingly, the inner or deeper skeleton is a close
222 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
reticulation of fairly stout fibres with well-marked differences
in spiculation between the main and connecting fibres;
whereas, in regions of least density, it is a very loose reticu-
lation of fine fibres, and the main fibres, in point of stoutness
and spiculation, are but slightly distinguished from the con-
necting.
Echinating acanthostyles are irregular in occurrence, and,
on the whole, comparatively scarce; they are sometimes com-
pletely enclosed within the fibres. Principal and auxiliary
spicules, the former in greater number, are somewhat-spar-
ingly scattered between the fibres, and with them occur also a
few acanthostyles.
Fig. 47—C. transiens
(typical form). a Prin- Fig. 47a—Clathria transiens
cipal styles. b Aux- (typical form). a Accessory styles.
iliary style. b Chela. ec Toxa.
SPONGES.—-HALLMANN. 22)
(2) Hormme(b). (Pl. xxx, fie-'2, and fies. 4g, 49a).
The branches are sub-cylindrical or but slightly compressed,
5 to 7 mm. in diameter, and lie in a single plane. The main
branches divide dichotomously and occasionally anatomose ;
the secondary branches often extend across the interval be-
tween adjoining main branches and effect a connection between
them. Ihe sponge is accordingly flabellate, and consists of a
reticulation of branches; it measures 120 mm. in height and
30 mm. in breadth. Wart-like prominences of irregular size
and shape are scattered over the surface. As in the typical
form, there is no appearance of a dermal
membrane, and the colour in alcohol is
pale yellowish grey; owing to the smaller
size of the principal styli, however, the
surface is much less distinctly hispid.
aD)
QO
('
Fig. 48—C. tran-
siens (form 6). a Fig. 48a—Clathria transiens
Principal styles. b (form 6). a Accessory styles.
Auxiliary tylostyle. b Chelze. c Toxa.
Megascleres.—
(i.) The principal styli vary in length from rio to 430 #1,
but very seldom exceed 320; their maximum dia-
meter is 13 }.
to
32 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
(1i.) The accessory styli are commonly quite smooth, and
are never distinctly spined. They range in length
from 55 to very rarely more than 80, and in dia-
meter up to 5}; occasional individuals up to 95 p in
length have been observed.
(ii.) The auxiliary tylostyli vary in length from less than
120 to 355 #, but only in extremely rare cases
exceed 300 j1; maximum diameter, 4.5 p.
Microscleres.—
(i.) Chelee, somewhat scarce, 14 to 204 long.
(ii.) Toxa, fairly plentiful, 12 to 132 in length, and
rarely slightly more than 2 in diameter.
Loc.—Coast of South Australia, forty miles west of
Kingston, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
(2) Somme (G)-am Els xexoctlie ines. 23))
The specimen is a broken one; the largest piece of it—the
subject of the figure—measures 210 mm. in length. The
primary branches, which appear to have been confined more or
Jess to one plane, are slightly compressed, and measure
about 15 mm. broad by 10 mm. thick. The secondary branches
usually arise along the lateral borders of the primaries.
The characteristic surface elevations are closely approxi-
mated ; in the sulci between them are the traces of an extremely
thin dermal membrane. The colour in alcohol is light greyish
brown.
Megascleres.—
(i.) The principal styli range in length from 120 to 365 #;
the stoutest are 16 7 in diameter.
(ii.) The accessory styli are commonly quite smooth and
are never distinctly spined. They vary in length
from 50 to 85, and up to 5 w in diameter.
(iii.) The auxiliary tylostyli vary in length from less than
110 to rarely more than 280 1; the largest observed
measured 320 x 4.54. They occur in considerable
abundance.
Microscleres.—
(i.) Chele, rather scarce, 16 to 19 p long.
(ii.) Toxa abundant, 25 to 172 in length, and up to
2 in diameter.
Loc.—Coast of South Australia, forty miles west of King-
ston, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 233
(4)-.F orm (d). 9(Pl: xxiv, tioe 2):
The specimen now to be described is perhaps sufficiently
distinguished in several respects from the three preceding to
permit of its being regarded as representing a variety of the
species, or even (if its differences be constant), as representing
an independent species. Its chief distinctive characters are:
(i.) The absence of chele; (ii.) a minute wartiness of the basal
ends of the auxiliary tylostyli; and (iii. ?) a restricted range of
length of the toxa.
The specimen, from which the stalk (save for a small por-
tion) is missing, measures 90 mm. in height. The branches
are, for the most part, irregularly cylindrical, and average
7 mm. in diameter. The primary branches, as in the specimen
of form (c), exhibit a kind of bilaterality expressing itself in a
tendency towards a distichous arrangement upon them of the
short secondary branches. The characteristic surface-eleva-
tions sometimes assume the form of short ridges, but usually
they are rounded and somewhat wart-like. There is a distinct
but very thin dermal membrane. The colour (in alcohol) is
purplish pink; this colour, however, is confined to a thin
superficial layer of the sponge, the inner parts being yellowish
grey. In life, the specimen was brick-red.}
Megascleres.—
(i.) The principal styli vary in length from 100 to 340 4,
and in diameter up to 11 ww. The smallest approxi-
mate extremely closely in size and shape to the acces-
sory styli. and figs si.)
Sponge stipitate with erect compressed branches.
Oscula small, marginal. Surface even. Dermal mem-
brane distinct, thin. Main skeleton an irregular reticu-
lation of stout densely echinated fibres; the main fibres
1 Owing to their rarity these spicules were at first overlooked and were
thus omitted from the text-figure.
2 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.). 1896, p. 32.
248 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
only, with a thin core of skeletal styli. Interstitial
spicules rave. Megascleres of both kinds (the acantho-
styles in lesser number) occur sparsely in the dermal
membrane, together with scattered chele. Megascleres:
—(i.) Skeletal, smooth substyli, 160 x 4 ; (i.) accessory
acanthostyli, 96 x 8 wp. Microscleres :—Isochele arcuate
18 to 27 p long.
The single specimen, preserved in alcohol, consists of a
sub-cylindrical stalk (about 80mm. long by 15mm. in dia-
meter) from which by two dichotomies there arise four erect
slightly compressed branches. The branches are closely
appressed and coalescent. Distantly separated oscula, seldom
more than 1mm. in diameter, occur in an irregular series
along the edges of the branches. The surface is free from
inequalities.1 There is a very thin but quite distinct dermal
membrane. The texture is dense; the
consistency, firm and fairly tough; the
colour, yellowish-brown. The total
height of the specimen is 325 mm.
a} je
The main skeleton is an irregular,
relatively small-meshed reticulation of
rather stout spongin fibres (sometimes
exceeding 200 # in diameter) somewhat
densely echinated by short acantho-
styles. In general, the area occupied
; : by the fibres themselves is greater than
that of the intervening spaces. A small
a
proportion of the fibres are provided
with a slender compact spicular core,
but except in this respect there is no
Fig. 51—W. curvi- evident distinction between main and
chela. a Showing connecting fibres. A notable feature of
basal d fet B
styli An al ben the skeleton is the almost entire ab-
tremity of same. b sence, except in close vicinity to the
Acanthostyle. c surface, of interstitial scattered megas-
Chela. cleres. The dermal membrane contains
scattered megascleres of both kinds (the
acanthostyles in lesser number) and fairly numerous chele ;
the last-mentioned, also, are somewhat scarce in the choano-
somal tissues.
Megascleres.—
(i.) The (auxiliary) smooth spicules are sharp-pointed
cylindrical subtylostyli (or less frequently simple
styli) with an elongate tylosis which usually tapers
1 The transverse ridges shown in the figure were produced by an en-
twining sea-weed.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 249.
more or less towards its extremity. Quite com-
monly the basal extremity of the spicule is either
abruptly or acuminately pointed, and the spicule ac-
cordingly sometimes passes into an asymmetrical
oxea. The length varies from 140 to 170 and the
maximum diameter is 4}.
(ii.) The (accessory) acanthostyles are sub-conical, with
moderately large, irregularly scattered, recurved
spines. They are rarely less than 60 long and
attain a size of 96 x 8y.
Microscleres.—
The chelze (isochele arcuate) vary from about 18 to 27 in
length ; except for a greater curvature of the shaft in the case:
of the shorter spicules there is no appreciable difference in
form between the longest and the shortest. In their earliest
stage of development they appear as a slender, slightly curved
rod; the ale are well advanced in development before the
rudiment of the front palm makes its appearance. At a certain
stage of their growth many bear a rather close resemblance to.
the longest of the three chelaee shown in text-figure 52a for
Wilsonella oxyphila.
Loc.—Coast of South Australia; (?) fifteen miles south of
St. Francis Island (‘‘Endeavour.’’)
WILSONELLA OXYPHILA, sp. nov.
(Plate xxxiv., fig. 3; and figs. 52, 52a.)
Sponge flabellate, simple or proliferous. (?) Oscula
small, marginal. Surface even, or with faint radiating
grooves, or areolately pitted. Dermal membrane dis-
tinct, thin. Main skeleton an irregular reticulation of
moderately slender, closely echinated fibres, with a
slender core of skeletal spicules. Interstitial spicules
scarce. Megascleres of both kinds (the accessory in
lesser number) are sparsely scattered in the dermal mem-
brane, together with frequent chele. Megascleres :—
(i.) Skeletal smooth substyli, 200 x 3 yw; (u.) accessory
acanthostyli and (occasional) acanthoxea, 80 x 4.5 i.
Microscleres: —Isochele arcuate, approaching the
palmate form, 16 to 26 yw long.
Introductory Remarks.—There are two specimens which I
assign to this species. In their external appearance there 1s
nothing that would suggest a specific identity, but they agree
so perfectly in their spicular characters that one hesitates to
separate them even as different varieties. Accordingly I have
thought it best, whilst uniting them under a single name, to:
!
|
250 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
keep their descriptions separate. The specimen which, on
account of its better preservation, I select as typical of the
species, is divided longitudinally into two equal portions; one
portion has been retained in spirits, the other was removed
and preserved in a dry state. Asa
result of its drying the latter has
undergone a remarkable amount of
shrinkage, being now scarcely more
than one-half its former size.1 The
second specimen is both macerated
and dry.
Description.—
(a) Typical Specimen. ‘The speci-
men, when complete, had the form of
an oval leaf-shaped plate, with the
narrower end drawn out into a short
stalk, and measured 120 mm. in
height, 90 mm. in greatest breadth
and 8 to ro mm. in thickness. Both
surfaces exhibit a number of obscure,
longitudinal, somewhat radiately
disposed grooves which become more
distinct towards the margin. ‘These
grooves are apparently due to the
presence of canals lying immediately
beneath the thin dermal membrane
which have caused the latter to
undergo a slight collapse. Owing to
the somewhat damaged state of the
Fig. 52—W. oxyphila. surface, it is impossible to speak with
Showing variations of the Certainty regarding oscula; it ap-
opposite extremities of G :
the smooth megascleres. PEars that the canals terminate along
the margin of the plate in small
circular openings.
The main skeleton is a reticulation of slender fibres which
are fairly closely echinated by small acanthostyles. The main
fibres contain a slender compact spicular core; the connecting
fibres interreticulate to a slight extent and are destitute of
axial spicules. Owing to the paleness of the spongin, the
main fibres, by reason of their axial spicules, stand out rather
conspicuously in comparison with the connecting fibres, so
that at first glance the skeleton might appear to be dendritic;
the false impression is, however, immediately corrected by the
presence of echinating spicules on the connecting fibres. Both
1 The piece was subsequently returned to alcohol and expanded again.
almost to its original size.
SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 251
kinds of megascleres, in very small number, are scattered
through the ground tissues and dermal membrane. Chelz are
fairly abundant in the dermal membrane, or at least in some
portions of it; but are rare in the interior.
Megascleres.—
(i.) The smooth (auxiliary) spicules show all gradations
in form between elongately-‘‘headed’’ subtylostyli
and asymmetrical oxea;
they are rarely less than
140 #, and usually between
160 and 170 } in length,
whilst their maximum size
is about 200 x 3 pH.
(ii.) The spined accessory spi-
cules are styli and oxea of a
similar dimensions, — the
latter occurring in relatively
small number. The spines
are small, and_ scattered
over the whole length of the
spicule. The maximum size
is 80 x 5 #; the length is
rarely less than 50 » and Fig. 52a—W. oayphila.
seldom more than 70 }. a Chel. b Acanthostyli.
Microscleres.—
Isochele of slightly variable shape, ranging in length from
20 to 26. Asarule, as seen in profile their form approaches
that of palmate isochele, but the shafe is slightly curved and
makes a rather wide angle with the sront palm; a small pro-
portion bear a close resemblance to arcuate isochele. Their
mode of development, however, indicates that their relation-
ship is rather with the arcuate type of chela. In their earliest
developmental stage they appear as a slender, slightly curved
rod; the rudiments of the ale next make their appearance, ex-
tending along the shaft at either end for about one-third of its
length; and finally the front palm is added. In the case of
quite an appreciable number of the chela—which otherwise
attain to full proportions and indeed are usually somewhat
longer than the average—the palm remains relatively small
and the spicule then often bears a striking resemblance to in-
completely developed chele of Wilsonella curvichela. The
normal form is that of the shortest of the three chela shown in
the adjoining text figure, though the spicule is usually not so
robust.
252 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Loc.—Near Kangaroo Island, South Australia, 17 fms.
(‘‘Endeavour’’).
(b). W. oxyphila, var.? (Plate xxxiv., fig. 3).
The different appearance presented by the second specimen
is partly due to its intense purplish colour, and perhaps partly
also to its dry macerated condition. The colour difference is
of little consequence since it probably results from the presence
of a symbrotic alga similar to that which affects certain other
Australian species, notably Chalina polychotoma, Carter,
Arenochalina mirabilis (Lendf.), Whitelegge,! and Echino-
clathria ramosau, sp. nov.
In shape (Pl. xxxiv., fig. 3) it is not materially different
from the typical specimen. It consists of a stipitate flabelli-
form plate (170 mm. in height and about the same in breadth,
and 6 to 8mm. thick) to which are added, mainly on one side,
a few lamelliform outgrowths, joined to it along vertical lines..
The washed-out condition of the specimen is most unsatis-
factory from many points of view for the purpose of full and
accurate description, but in this case it possesses the ad-
vantage of permitting the rather characteristic gross structure
of the skeleton to be readily perceived. I have not been able
to convince myself that the type specimen, if macerated, would.
show a similar structure. The surface is everywhere irregu-
larly covered with shallow, roughly polygonal or rounded
honeycombcell-like pits on an average 2 mm. in diameter, and
more or less distinctly arranged in longitudinal series running
from the base to the margin of the plate. Where the sponge
is thin, the ‘‘cells’’ may completely perforate it; when the
1 From an examination of a section which I have prepared of a frag-
ment of a British Museum specimen labelled ‘ Arenochalina mirabilis:
Lendenfeld, Torres Straits,’ and a comparison of its skeletal structure
with that figured by Lendenfeld (Zool. Jahrb., 1387. taf. xxvii., fig. 28).
I feel sure that this specimen is truly representative of Lendenfeld’s
species. I find, also, that Whitelegge’s Arenochalina mirabilis, from Port
Jackson, is closely allied to, if not identical with, the same species.
Lendenfeld’s description is accordingly wrong in stating that the megas-
cleres are oxea; they are slightly fusiform subtylostyli with relatively
large axial canal. Whether the typical 4A. mirabilis possesses chele or
not I am unable to say, since, in the fragment referred to, owing to its
washed-out condition, interstitial spicules are entirely absent. However,
in the Port Jackson sponge there occur scattered anisochele palmate of
simple form, and, since the close relationship of this sponge to Lenden-
feld’s is beyond doubt, one can therefore say that the genus Arenochalina
possesses the spiculation of Mycale, and that it will probably form one of
the sub-genera into which the latter genus will no doubt ultimately
be subdivided. The external resemblance of Arenochalina mirabilis to
Spongelia elegans (c.f.. Whitelegge—Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., pl. x., fig. 7, and
Lendenfeld—Monogr. Horny Sponges, pl. xxxix., fig. 2) is so striking that
it almost casts doubt on Lendenfeld’s record of the occurrence of the:
latter species in the same area as the former, viz., at Broken Bay, New
South Wales. ‘
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 253
sponge is held up before the light, the partition between the
rows of ‘‘cells’’ appear as ribs traversing the sponge longi-
tudinally in a slightly radiating fashion. The consistency is
fairly soft and slightly brittle.
The fibres are so densely surrounded by pigmented matter
that the section required to be decolorised in order to bring
them into view. The colour dissolves out in nitric acid as a
bright carmine which soon disappears, particularly on warm-
ing. ‘The skeleton differs from that of the preceding specimen
in its much greater irregularity, but this is probably more
apparent than real and due to the fact that the connecting
fibres—owing to the dry state of the specimens and the conse-
quent absence of interfibral substance-—are no less conspicuous
than the connecting fibres. In all other respects the two
sponges appear to be identical.
Loc.—Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 20-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
A ES) SY san}
Assuming the descriptions of Clathria elegantula, Ridley
and Dendy, and Clathria piniformis, Carter,! to be correct in
detail, it might be said that WV. oxyphila forms a connecting
link between them. The three species agree very closely in
their characters; but oxeote modifications of the megascleres
have not been mentioned for C elegantula, nor have chelz
been recorded for C. piniformis. It is, however, quite
possible that the typical specimen of W. oxyphila may
prove to belong to Carter’s species, and the varietal specimen,
to Ridley and Dendy’s.
GENUS OPHLITASPONGIA, Bowerbank.
In view of the existence of such a species as Clathria tran-
siens, sp. nov.—in one of the forms of which, the accessory
styli are smooth—the definition of Ophlitaspongia, as pro-
posed by Dendy,? needs amendment so as to restrict the genus
to species whose echinating and coring spicules (if both be
present) are similar or, at any rate, not definably different.
The amendment will probably necessitate the removal of O.
membranacea, Thiele (vide p. 215), to Clathria; but, so far as
I know, it affects no other species of the genus. The definition
requires also to be modified in such a way as to clearly dis-
tinguish the genus from Echinochalina (q.v.). Ophlitaspongia
has commonly been spoken of as differing from Clathria in the
1 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 354; Dendy—Proc. Roy.
Soc. Vict. (n.s.), vili., 1896, p. 34.
2 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 36.
254 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
smoothness of its echinating spicules; in its restricted sense,
it will be more correct to say of the genus that it differs from
Clathria in the absence of accessory spicules. The genus is,
however, a very generalised one and such species as might be
included in it are capable of derivation from a number of
different genera.
Owing to such species as Clathria transiens, Echinochalina
intermedia, Whitelegge, O. tenuis, Carter, O. tubulosa, sp. n.,
and O. nidificata, Kirkpatrick,! the task of satisfactorily de-
fining Ophlitaspongia is rendered rather difficult. With the
exception of O. nidificata (for which almost unquestionably a
new genus should be established) the species of which I have
information seem to require some such definition as the follow-
ing: “‘External form various, but never regularly honey-
combed. Skeleton a reticulation of usually well-developed
horny fibre which is cored or echinated, or both cored and
echinated by smooth basical! styli (sometimes accompanied by
oxeote modifications). The basical styli, which are typically
of a single kind, may exhibit some degree of differentiation
into two kinds, but there is never any definable difference of
form between those which core and those which echinate, the
fibres. Monactinal auxiliary spicules, occurring interstitially
and in the dermal layer, are typically present. Microscleres, if
present, are isochele palmate and (or) toxa.’’
In O. papilla, Bowbk., the type-species, and in O. seriata,
Bowbk., the fibres are said to be provided only with echinating
spicules. In the species described in the present paper the
echinating spicules are relatively few in number and, to
some extent, accidental in the occurrence; they are, in
fact, precisely analagous to the spicules (of common
occurrence in the genus Clathria) which in the case of
C. partita I have referred to as ‘‘quasi-echinating’’ spi-
cules. That such spicules are, in some cases at least,
to be regarded as, in a sense, accidental, is evident from
the following considerations. (i.) In the species in which
these occur, the (principal) spicules are not confined to the
fibres only, but also occur in the ground substance; it is quite
to be expected, therefore, that some proportion of them
should be found to occupy an intermediate situation, i.e.,
partly within, and partly projecting from the fibre. (ii.) The
formation of spicules at the growing-point of the fibre pre-
cedes their envelopment by spongin, and since these terminal
spicules are often spread penicillately, it follows that outlying
1 Kirkpatrick—Nat. Antarctic Exped., iv., 1908, Tetraxonida, p. 25.
2 Vide pp. 137, 138.
SBPONGES.—HALLMANN.
un
SW
Fo)
individuals may sometimes be left only partially included
‘within the completed fibre. (iii.) Owing to the continued
growth in stoutness of a fibre, spicules originally lying ex-
ternally, but in close proximity to it, might secondarily come
to be surrounded at their basal extremity by the fibre-spongin.
(iv.) In the superficial regions of the sponge, spicules which
appear as if echinating, are often nothing more than the
axial spicules of incipient connecting fibres; this occurs most
frequently when the connecting fibres are unispicular. (v.) It
sometimes happens that the development of a connecting fibre
—say, an unispicular fibre—proves abortive, the fibre then
appearing as a process from its supporting main fibre; in such
a case, if the process were very short, its axial spicule would
appear to echinate the main fibre.
In the species of Ophlitaspongia described herein, the echi-
nating spicules appear to arise in one or other of the ways
andicated.
Dendy! has remarked that his Siphonochalina bispiculata
resembles an Ophlitaspongia save in the fact that the spicules
.are oxea; perhaps this species should be placed in the genus
Diplodemia, Bowerbank.
OPHLITASPONGIA CONFRAGOSA, Sp. nov.
(Plate xxxv., fig. 2, and fig. 53.)
Sponge small, delicate; of indeterminate habit;
probably consisting, in most cases, of compressed up-
growths arising from a thin encrusting base. Oscula
indistinguishable, perhaps absent. Skeleton an irregular
sub-renieroid reticulation of thin pauci- or uni-spicular
spongin-fibres, with meshes the sides of which are
usually of not more than a spicule’s length. Quasi-
echinating spicules are of occasional occurrence. Aux-
iliavy spicules are scattered interstitially—in some parts,
sparsely; in others, in dense profusion. Megascleres :—
(i.) Straight or (seldom) slightly curved principal styli,
cylindrical throughout the greater portion of their length,
slightly inflated at the base and gradually tapering to a
point, attaining a size of 190 x 12 pl; (il.) auxiliary sub-
tylostyli with a maximum size of 300 x 5.5 #. Micro-
scleres :—(i.) Palmate isochele 10 yt long; (iti.) bow-
shaped toxa, 80 x 3 # in maximum size.
1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vii. (n.s.), 1895, p. 246.
“ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
The single specimen, preserved in a dry state, is a small
sponge of indefinite shape growing dispersedly over the fronds
of a foliaceous calcareous Bryozoan. It consists in part of a
thin spreading layer closely in-
vesting the surface of the fronds,.
and in part of irregular com-
pressed outgrowths arising
along their margins. The
lamellar portions of the sponge
(which constitute by far the
greater portion of its bulk) have
an uneven, irregularly undulat-
ing surface, and, owing to vary-
ing rates of growth at different
points, an irregularly lobed and
broken margin; they vary from
b B 1 to 3 mm. in thickness, are
indefinite in width, and attain, in
the present instance, a maxi-
a mum height of 50 mm. Owing
to incomplete coalescence be-
tween the marginal lobes as
growth proceeds, the lamelle
are frequently fenestrate. There
are no certain indications of
oscula. The surface is minutely
(
porous. The colour is yellowish-
grey; the consistency firm, com-
pressible, slightly brittle; the
texture, finely fibrous.
The main skeleton is a web-
like sub-renieroid irregular re--
ticulation of pale slender horny
fibres with pauciserially or uni-
serially arranged axial spicules
(principal styli). The precise
formation of the skeleton is diffi-
cult of determination ; apparently
there is a primary reticulation
of stouter fibres, the meshes
Fig. 53—O. contragosa. a of which are occupied by a
Fe ce Ate: eae second DE Sy interreticulum | of
‘ mostly unispicular connecting
fibres. The outlines of the
stouter fibres are vague, and the arrangement of their spicules.
is disorderly; they seldom exceed gop in diameter. The
(usually single) spicules forming the sides of the angular
meshes of the interreticulum are probably always surrounded.
SPONGES._HALLMANN. 257
by a layer of spongin; but this is often so thin as to be indis-
cernible, and in such cases the spicules sometimes appear as if
echinating. Quasi-echinating spicules are also of common
occurrence on the more superficial fibres; these, in some if
not all cases, mark the starting-points of new fibres. Scattered
(auxiliary) subtylostyli occur interstitially, in some parts
sparsely, in other parts in great abundance.
Megascleres.—
(i.) Principal styli straight, usually slightly expanded at
the base, very nearly cylindrical throughout about
three-fourths of their length and tapering thence to a
sharp point, ranging in length from about 130 to
190 zx, and with a maximum diameter of 12 j.
(ui.) Straight auxiliary subty lostyli or styli, 130 to 300 yp
in length and 6 # in maximum diameter.
-Microscleres.—
(i.) Isochelee palmate, fairly plentiful, 10 long.
(ii.) Toxa, comparatively scarce, in shape somewhat re-
sembling the conventional bow of archery; length,
25 to 80; diameter of the stoutest, 3 p.
Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, Shoalhaven Bight,
15-45 fms. (“‘Endeavour’’).
OPHLITASPONGIA SUBHISPIDA, Carter.
(Plate xxxvi., fig. 1; and fig. 52.)
1885. Echinoclathria subhispida, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat.
list(S), xVi., 1888, p. 350:
Echinoclathria gracilis, Carter, Loc. cit., p. 356.
1896. Ophlitaspongia subhispida, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc.
Vict. (n-s.), viit:, 1896, p. 36.
Sponge stipitate, with slender usually somewhat flattened
branches which multiply dichotomously or (occasionally)
polytomously, and extend, with or without anastomosis,
in the same or in overlapping planes. Dermal membrane
absent, or, at any rate, indistinct. Oscula not visible.
Skeleton a regular scalariform reticulation of strongly
developed horny fibres; the main fibres contain a discrete
paucispicular core, the transverse fibres are without con-
tained spicules. Principal styli are tolerably abundant
in the ground substances and common as echinating
Principal styli. b Auxiliary
tylostylus. c Toxa.
“ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
spicules. Scarce auxiliary spicules are scattered inter-
stitially. Megascleres :—(i.) Principal styli, usually more
or less curved, sub-fusiform, with a slight sub-basal
waist, varying in length from about 50 (seldom less than
80) to 155 p, and in diameter up to 5.5 pw; (i.) auxiliary
tylostyli, straight or in variable manner curved, 100 (or
less) to 250 pw in length, and rarely as muchas 1.5 ¢ in
diameter. Microscleres :—Toxa, by no means scarce, 30
to 80 win length and never more than 1 « in diameter.
The external form of this
species has already been suff-
ciently well described, but no
adequate account of the skeleton:
has so far been rendered; also,
the information concerning the
spicules is incomplete, and, to
some extent, misleading. The
| specimen herein figured measures
100 mm. in height. The skeleton
is a very regular reticulation of
densely horny fibres, which are of
a b a pale brownish tint and (except in
proximity to the sponge-surface)
rarely less than 70 or more than:
, 100 # in diameter ; the main fibres.
| contain a meagre wispy core of
slender styli, the connecting fibres
are vacant. As seen in median
longitudinal section of a branch,
the main fibres run longitudinally
(in subparallelism, and from 80 to
120 p apart) with a slight outward
trend which gradually increases
to a curvature as the exterior is
| approached, and arrive at the
surface at an inclination to it
varying (in different parts of the
sponge) from about 45° to nearly
go°; they are joined at irregular
intervals, in a scalariform fashion,
by the short, stout transverse
fibres. The meshes») off) the
reticulation have their angles
ee
Fig. 54—O. subhispida. a
rounded off, and are usually elongated in the longitudinal
direction; they vary in shape from circular to oblong.
Owing to the absence of a dermal membrane, the free ex-
tremities of the main fibres give to the surface an appearance
of hispidity.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 259
Styli similar to those which core the fibres, 7.e., principal
styli, occur in moderate number, both as echinating and as
interstitial spicules; when interstitial, they are for the most
part disposed parallely to the main fibres. Scattered between
the fibres also, are a small number of very slender (auxiliary)
tylostyli. The echinating spicules appear to be most abundant
on the superficial fibres ; but the majority of those which occur
in that situation are partly or completely invested by a sheath
of spongin and are evidently nothing more than the rudiments
of developing new fibres. According to Carter’s description
the echinating spicules are of a different kind to those which
core the fibres—but this is not so; for although the former are
perhaps, on the average, of smaller size than the latter, yet
between the two there is absolutely no difference of shape.
Accordingly, it would be incorrect to suppose that O. sub-
hispida bears any close. relationship to such a sponge as
Clathria transita, form (d), (p. 233), in which the echinating
styli, although quite smooth, are quite distinct from the
principal spicules.
Loc.—Port Philip, Victoria (Carter; Dendy; Austr. Mus.
Cole):
OPHLITASPONGIA SUBHISPIDA, Carter, VAR. VIMINALIS,
Lendenfeld.
(Plate xxxvi., fig. 1, and fig. 55.)
1888. Thalassodendron viminalis, Lendenfeld, Cat. Sponges
Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 225.
1902. Thalassodendron viminalis, Whitelegge, Rec. Austr.
Mus. iv., 5, 1902, p. 214.
[1g01. Not Thalassodendron viminalis, Whitelegge, Op. cit.,
IV962,, TOOL, p. 87.\|
My acquaintance with this sponge is limited to a single dry
specimen (the one described by Whitelegge, and herein figured)
which in outward form approaches, and in internal characters
—except in regard to the size and, to some extent, to the
shape of its spicules—exactly resembles O. subhispida.
Indeed, the differences between the two are not so great that
they might not be due to individual variation; but in order to
establish this point further material is required.
The description which I have given of the skeleton pattern
of O. subhispida is here again applicable without qualification.
and as regards the external features, Whitelegge’s account
will suffice. The latter author’s description of the skeleton is
slightly misleading in one respect, inasmuch as it conveys the
260 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
“
impression that the fibres ‘‘which curve gracefully outwards
and terminate at the surface’’ are branches arising from the
stouter main fibres of the ‘‘axial plexus’’ (as for example in
Clathria arcuophora), whereas, as a matter of fact, they
appear rather to be direct
continuations of those
fibres. The description
also errs in attempting to
fix precise limits to the
diameters of the axial,
superficial and transverse
fibres.
The principal styli vary
in length from about 75 to
220 p, and in diameter up
to 8 or (very rarely) 9 y;
generally speaking, they
agree in form with those
of O. subhispida but are
somewhat peculiar in the
fact that a _ considerable
proportion (usually of the
stouter individuals) are
wanting in the slight basal
swelling or knob charac-
teristic of the latter, and
thus have the basal ex-
tremity shaped somewhat
like the handle of an oar.
However, I find that this
peculiarity is also occa-
sionally exhibited, though
Fig. 55—Ophlitaspongia subhispida, in a less marked degree,
var. viminalis. a Principal styli by the spicules of O. sub-
(selected) showing in varying degree BG .
the basal peculiarity. b Auxiliary hispida, and is therefore of
tylostyli. doubtful value as a dis-
tinctive character of the
variety.
The auxiliary spicules are slender, usually curved or flexuous
tylostyli which seldom exceed 200 7 in length, and appear to
be never more than 1 in diameter; the longest observed
measured 240}. In O. subhispida also, it should be noted,
the auxiliaries are sometimes flexuous.
The toxa are similar in form to, and (except for a slighter
stoutness) of the same dimensions, as those of O. subhispida.
Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, Illawarra (Austr. Mus.
Colle):
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 261
OPHLITASPONGIA TENUIS, Carter.
"(Plate xxxv., fig. 1, and fig..'56-)
to)
1885. Echinoclathria tenuis, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.(5),
Viel GSS Ps 355:
1886. Phakellia papyracea, Carter, Op. cit. (5), xvili., 1886,
P= 379:
1896. Ophlitaspongia tenuis, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict.,
Willa (Mss >) OGOs paraze
[Not Clathria tenuis, Hentschel, Fauna Siidwest-
Australiens, Tetraxonida, ii., 1911, p. 377. |
[ 1887. (?) Antherochalina tenuispina, Lendenfeld, Zool.
Jahrb. 1887, p. 780. |
Sponge flabelliform, thin, stipitate. Surface even.
Oscula apparently absent. No dermal membrane.
Skeleton: In young parts of ithe sponge, spongin being
yet but scantily developed, the skeleton appears as a
more or less ‘‘venieroid’’ reticulation which, in the mid-
region of the lamina, is irregularly isodictyal, but which,
in vicinity to the surface (owing to the presence there
of outwardly-running paucispicular fibres), becomes
generally rectangular; usually, also, longitudinally dis-
posed sheaves of spicules, lying in the mid-region, pro-
duce an appearance of axial condensation. Later, there
is developed in the mid-region a dense plexus of stout
horny fibres which to some extent obscure, and perhaps
in part ensheath, the spicules of the “‘isodictyal’’ mesh-
work; with increase of age, also, the lamina thickens,
the excurrent fibres are correspondingly prolonged, and
the rectangularly-meshed outer layer is consequently of
greater width. Auxiliary tylostyli are scattered inter-
stitially in variable number, generally singly, but also in
bundles. Quasi-echinaling (principal) styli are, as a rule,
moderately scarce. Megascleres:—(i.) Curved tapering
principal styli, typically more or less fusiform and basally
manubriate or sub-basally constricted, showing signs of
a slight differentiation into two kinds, ranging in length
from about 75 to upwards of 240 p, and varying in maxi-
mum diameter in different specimens from & to 12 y;
(ii.) auxiliary tylostyli, straight or flexuous, with a length
of from 160 to upwards of 250 p, and a maximum
diameter of 3.5 #. Microscleres absent.
262 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
This species is represented in the Australian Museum col-
lection by eight specimens, the largest of which measures
Fig. 56—O. fenuts.
a Principal styli. b
Auxiliary tylostylus.
(From a Port Phillip
specimen.)
250 mm. in height by about the same in
breadth, and varies in thickness from 2
mm. at the margin, where it is thinnest,
to a maximum of 5.5 mm. Smaller
specimens are proportionately thinner.
The lamina is, frequently, irregularly
subdivided in a partite manner, and its
margin is sometimes lobate. In most
specimens, more or less distinct external
indications of intermittent growth are
noticeable; Carter no doubt refers to
these when he describes the surface (of
Phakellia papyracea) as ‘‘concentrically
lineated.”’
The skeleton is condensed along
radiating branched lines, and _ also,
owing to continued development of
spongin, greatly increases in density
with increase of age; accordingly, sec-
tions taken from different portions of
the same specimen may differ consider-
ably in the pattern which they reveal.
In consequence of the linear condensa-
tions of the skeleton, the marginal re-
gion of the sponge lamina, if sufficiently
thin to be at all translucent, usually
shows to the naked eye an appearance
of subparallel venation—-the ‘‘veins’’
being, on an average, rather less than
I mm. apart. These veins are found to
be due to the presence of abundant
longitudinally disposed spicules, mostly
arranged in bundles.
In the youngest, or marginal portions
of the sponge, before any readily notice-
able amount of spongin is developed,
the skeleton (except in proximity to the
surface) is an irregular ‘‘renieroid’’
reticulation with triangular to polygonal
meshes, the sides of which are formed,
as a rule, each of a single spicule
enveloped in a minimum amount of
spongin. Towards the surface, how-
ever, excurrent pauciserial spongin-ensheathed lines of
somewhat plumosely arranged spicules (secondary fibres)
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 263
make their appearance, which become more distinct as
the surface is approached and terminate each in a few pro-
jecting spicules. In longitudinal section, perpendicular to the
sponge lamina, these fibres are seen to be arranged pinnately
with regard to the mid-line of the section; and since they usu-
ally lie closely, and are then connected by short (mostly
unispicular) transverse fibres, the skeleton in its superficial
portions becomes for the most part rectangular in mesh. Thus,
the pattern of the skeleton changes in passing outwards from
the mid-plane to the surface, from more or less irregularly
‘“‘isodictyal’’ to more or less ‘‘scalariform.’’ The isodictyal
pattern of the mid-region is, however, in most sections, to
some extent obscured or interrupted by the dense spicular ag-
gregations constituting the ‘‘veins’’ above referred to.
In older portions of the sponge, the skeleton presents a quite
different aspect, owing mainly to the presence, in the mid-
region of the lamina, of a dense plexus of stout horny fibres.
These appear to be quite analogous to the primary fibres of
such species as Clathria arcuophora and C. frondosa, and ac-
cordingly might be so designated, although they are subse-
quent in order of formation to those which have been termed
‘*secondary’’ or excurrent fibres. In contrast with the latter
fibres, which are pale-coloured, the primary fibres are of a
deep yellowish tint and are generally aspiculous: as the latter
fact indicates, they arise, for the greater part at least, inde-
pendently of the “‘isodictyal’’ spicular meshwork occupying
the same region. Apparently, they are earliest developed in
connection with the radial venations above referred to—the
intermediate belts remaining for some time unaffected; ulti-
mately, however, the plexus which they form extends in the
mesial plane continuously. In sections from the marginal
region, it is seldom that primary fibres are sufficiently
developed to be distinguished ; but such sections often show,
in the place of these, a yellowish colouration suggestive of
diffused spongin.
The different appearance of the skeleton (as seen in longi-
tudinal section perpendicular to the lamina) in the older
portions of the sponge, is due also to the increased width (con-
sequent upon the growth in thickness of the lamina, and in
length of the secondary fibres) of the rectangularly-meshed
superficial layer extending between the mesial or ‘“‘plexal’’
region and the surface; and, furthermore, the secondary fibres
and their connectives are here provided with a well-developed
sheath of spongin. In the older parts of the sponge, therefore,
there is nothing in the character of the skeleton to warrant the
statement (which Dendy has made) that ‘‘The species is in-
teresting because it shows a structure intermediate betweer
264 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
the Ectyoninz and the Axinellide, so that it might, with
almost equal justice, be placed in either group.’’
The principal megascleres are slightly differentiated (but are
not separable) into two kinds as regards size, though not to
any appreciable extent as regards shape. The larger—which
are the less numerous—occur chiefly as coring spicules in the
excurrent or secondary fibres and as longitudinally directed
interstitial spicules in the mesial region of the sponge. Quasi-
echinating spicules are most commonly met with in connection
with the secondary fibres and their connectives ; the frequency
of their occurrence varies greatly in different specimens, and in
some they are comparatively rare. The auxiliary megascleres
(tylostyli) also vary in abundance, though they are never by
any means scarce: they are, for the most part, scattered singly
and lie parallel to the fibres; but parallel bundles—chiefly con-
fined to the mid-region of the lamina and_ longitudinally
disposed—also occur.
The spicule characters are as follows :-—
(i.) The principal megascleres are straight to curved, grad-
ually tapering; styli, of very variable length in any given
specimen, and in different specimens differing to some extent
in regard to their precise form and maximum size. In the
specimen from which the spicules shown in the text figure
were drawn, and in a mounted slide prepared from a piece of a
British Museum specimen labelled Echinoclathria tenuis, they
almost invariably exhibit a handle-like basal part (suggestive
of the handle of an oar), about to to 20 in length, which may
or may not expand slightly at the end of the spicule to form a
faint basal knob. In some specimens obtained by the ‘‘En-
deavour,’’ on the other hand, the spicules approach very
closely in form those of O. inornata, sp. nov. (text-fig. 57),
and only a small proportion of them are marked by a ‘“‘handle’’
which, even so, is usually not well defined. In the first-
mentioned specimen, in which these spicules are of slenderer
proportions than in any of the others, they range from about
70 to 280 (but are very seldom more than 240) » in length, and
are at most 8 in diameter ; whilst in the last-mentioned speci-
mens, in which their size is greatest, they range in length from
80 to 310 and attain a maximum diameter of 12. The
largest spicules are mostly to be found amongst those which
project at the surface. Oxeote modifications, which appear
to be always of lesser than the medium length, are of oc-
casional occurrence. Usually, amongst the shorter spicules
(of length below, say, 130 4) there are some with a few (seldom
more than one or two) spine-like prominences ; these (vestigi-
ally spined?) spicules appear to occur most frequently in
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 265
stouter-spiculed specimens, but in any case they are scarce
and in the first-mentioned two specimens have not been
observed.
(ii.) The auxiliary tylostyli are normally straight, but in
some specimens a considerable proportion, perhaps even a
majority, are variously flexed. They range in length from less
than 160 to (usually) slightly more than 300; their greatest
observed length in any specimen was 350}.
I have quoted Antherochalina tenuispina, Lendenfeld, as a
probable synonym of O. tenuis on the evidence of a small
piece of a British Museum specimen labelled with the name
and locality (viz., Western Port, Victoria) of Lendenfeld’s
species. As the fragment conforms in external features with
Lendenfeld’s description, I have but little doubt that the name
attached to it is the correct one, and would say, therefore, that
in respect of its spicular characters A. tenuispina has been
wrongly described.
In some features of the skeleton QO. tenuis resembles
Clathria (?) chartacea, Whitelegge (vide p. 208)—a species
from which, externally, it appears to be indistinguishable.
Locs.—Port Philip, 18-20 fms. (Carter; Dendy; Austr.
Mus. Coll.); forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia,
30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
OPHLITASPONGIA INORNATA, Sp. nov.
(Plate xxxvi., fig. 2, and fig. 57:)
Sponge stipitate, ramose; branches short and crooked,
mostly confined to one plane, sometimes anastomosing.
No apparent dermal membrane. Oscula doubtfully
present. Skeleton: In the older parts of the sponge, the
axial region of the branches ts occupied by a dense plexus
of stout, generally aspiculous, horny fibres, by a pro-
fusion of longitudinally-disposed extrafibral spicules
(principal styli) arranged in loose bundles and strands,
and by single spicules which, though generally scattered
without order, appear in places as if arranged reticulately.
From the axial region there run outwards and upwards
to the surface, fibres with divergingly disposed and fre-
> quently echinating spicules which, at the.extremity of the
fibre, form a projecting tuft; these fibres are joined by
transverse and interreticulating paucispicular connecting
fibres forming with them rectangular and polygonal
266 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
meshes with sides of a spicule’s length. All the spicules
afore-mentioned are principal styli; auxiliary tylostyli are
scattered in moderate number in the ground substance of
the interior, but become rather abundant in parts of the
outermost layer. In the youngest portions of the sponge
the skeleton differs from this mainly in absence of an
axial fibre-plexus. Megascleres:—(i.) Principal styli
curved, subconical to slightly fusiform, usually with a
slight sub-basal waist and slight basal knob, ranging in
length from 75 to 220 pt, and in diameter up to 12 p; (ii.)
straight auxiliary tylostyli, 140 to 240 p in length, 2.5 u
in maximum diameter. Microscleres absent.
The single (spirit-preserved) specimen, the form of which
is sufficiently indicated by the figure (Pl. xxxvi., fig. 2),
measures 90 mm. in height, inclusive of the stalk. The colour
is yellowish-grey ; the consistency moderately firm and tough.
Scattered over the surface at fairly close though irregular
intervals, are minute rounded openings mostly less than $ mm.
in diameter. These are scarcely discernible on some parts of
the surface, very noticeable on others, being most pronounced
where apparently maceration has occurred; it is therefore
probable that they are subdermal. No dermal membrane,
however, is observable; this may be due to imperfect preserva-
tion, yet the membrane, if originally present, must have been
very thin. Towards the upper extremity of the branches a few
larger openings (up to 1 mm. in diameter) occur, which are
possibly oscula.
The appearance of the skeleton undergoes a marked change
with increase of age owing to the formation in the axial region
of the branches of a dense plexus of horny fibres. In this
respect the species is quite analogous to O. tenuis, to which
very probably it is related. The character of the skeleton in
the older portions of the sponge is so similar in the two
species, that what has been said in regard thereto in the case
of O. tenuis is also applicable in the present instance, except-
ing that here the extrafibral spicules of the axial region are
more abundant, the reticulation formed by the secondary and
their connecting fibres is less regular, the coring spicules of the
fibres are arranged in an axinelloid manner, echinating spi-
cules are plentiful, and auxiliary megascleres are rather
scarce. The formation of the axial plexus, however, appears
to be much longer delayed in the present species, being clearly
marked only in the stalk and the basal portions of the
branches.
In the upper region of the branches, for a considerable por-
tion of their length, the skeleton is composed chiefly of
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 267
abundant longitudinally-directed (principal) spicules for the
most part arranged in close multispicular fibre-like strands, the
appearance and disposition of which is such that, at first sight,
they might be mistaken for main skeletal fibres, their resem-
blance to the latter being
heightened by the fact that
the spicules composing them
are held together by some
amount of yellowish spon-
ginous material. In addition <
to these spicular strands,
however, though more or
less concealed by them ex-
cept towards the surface,
there is a _ reticulation of
longitudinal (main) and
transverse (connecting) slen-
der horny fibres with pauci-
serially-arranged coring,
and frequent echinating,
spicules; the _ transverse a a a b
fibres are usually of not
more than a spicule’s length.
Owing to the partial con-
cealment of the primary
fibres proper, by the dense
array of longitudinal spi-
cules, it is with the strands
which these spicules form,
rather than with the main
fibres, that the transverse
fibres appear to reticulate.
Finally, there are many
irregularly scattered princi- ;
pal and auxiliary spicules, Fig. 57—O. inornata. a Princi-
the former in greater abun- pal styli. b Auxiliary tylostylus.
dance. The general appear-
ance of the skeleton in this
region of the sponge, as seen in longitudinal section, is not
unlike that of O. tenuis as seen in a marginal section parallel
to the plane of the sponge lamina—the multispicular strands in
the present case taking the place of the less closely arranged
“linear condensations”’ or ‘‘venations’’ of the latter species.
The auxiliary spicules increase in number in the superficial
layer, and in some parts of it are very abundant; they lie
generally parallel to the surface. Projecting beyond the sur-
face at the extremities of the main fibres are tufts of diver-
gently-arranged principal spicules—the terminal spicules of
268 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
the fibres; the number of spicules composing such a tuft is,
however, frequently greater than that in a cross-section of the
fibre.
The form and size of the spicules have been given in the
diagnosis.
Loc.—Coast of South Australia, fifteen miles south of St.
Francis Island, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
OPHLITASPONGIA AXINELLOIDES (?), Dendy.
(Plate xxxvi., fig. 3, and fig. 58.)
1896. Ophlitaspongia axinelloides, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc.
Vict., vill. (n.s.), 1896, p. 309.
Sponge erect, lobose, stipitate; the lobes compressed.
Oscula covered by a membrane. Surface even, with a
minutely reticulate appearance. Main skeleton composed
of moderately stout horny fibres forming an irregular to
subrectangular reticulation with meshes of greatly vary-
ing size, except superficially, where they are uniformly
smaller. Main fibres provided with a meagre core of
loosely arranged (principal) spicules, some of which are
disposed echinatingly; connecting fibres generally with
one or a few spicules uniserially arranged. Superficial
skeleton consisting of closely arranged, outwardly pro-
jecting tufts of principal spicules. Auxiliary spicules
(styli) are scattered interstitially in moderate numbers,
together with less numerous principal spicules, and are
vather abundant in the oscular membranes where they
are arranged radiately. Megascleres :—(i.) The principal
spicules are normally styli, straight, subconical to
slightly fusiform, but an appreciable proportion (say 1
in 20) are secondarily diactinal (oxea); their length ranges
from about So to 135 p, whilst theiy maximum diameter
(which is rarely attained by individuals longer than 120 })
is 11 p; (it.) auxiliary styli, straight, cylindrical, rapidly
tapering to a sharp point, 115 to 200 p in length, and
with a maximum diameter of 5 }.
A single specimen, in the collection of the Australian
Museum, agrees so well, on the whole, with O. axinelloides,
as to render it highly probable that its points of difference
from the specimen described by Dendy are purely individual ;
accordingly I have refrained from bestowing upon it a
distinctive name. The specimen (PI. xxxvi., fig. 3), which
measures 115mm. in height, is incomplete, representing ap-
parently about one-half of the original, and consists of a single
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 2609
much compressed lobe, together with the longitudinally bi-
sected stalk.
It differs from O. axinelloides as described, chiefly in regard
to the situation of the
oscula, in the larger size,
and lesser abundance in
the fibres, of the principal
spicules, and in the much
greater development of the
superficial (‘““dermal’’)
skeleton.
On casual inspection,
oscula appear to be ab-
sent; but along the mar-
gin and one side of the
lobe are to be noticed, here
and there, light-coloured
rounded spots, 1.5 mm. or
less in diameter, which
prove to be _ concealed
oscula-like openings
covered only by a thin
membranous diaphragm
continuous with the (else-
where very thin and
scarcely discernible) der-
mal membrane.
the!) s;oscular mem-
branes’’ contain numerous
radially disposed horizon-
tally-lying auxiliary styli, Fig. 58—O. axinelloides _ a Princi-
which are absent from P2! Styli. b Oxeote Ree of
other parts of the dermal same. Auxiliary stylus (unlettered).
layer. A dermal skeleton
proper can,” therefore,
hardly be said to be
present. There is, however, a superficial skeleton of a special
kind, formed of closely situated tufts of principal spicules ;
these tufts, to the presence of which is due a minutely reticulate
appearance of the surface, are borne upon extremely short
fibres, or rather processes, which arise from the superficial
transverse fibres.
In the description of O. axinelloides the fibres are said to be
about 7oy thick and to be pretty abundantly cored by styli
about 100 x Sy in size. In the present specimen, the fibres
may attain a diameter of 100 y#, and are sparsely cored—the
270 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
spicules being seldom more than, or even as many as, three
in a cross-section of the fibre; moreover, the spicules (7.e., the
principal spicules) are, as already indicated in the diagnosis,
of notably larger size. Similar spicules in moderate number
also occur interstitially ; and scattered plentifully among them,
as in O. axinelloides, are longer and slenderer (auxiliary) styl
of variable size. The range in size of the auxiliary styli can be
determined with certainty only by measurement of those which
lie in the ‘‘oscula membranes”’ (from which principal spicules
are always absent), since the shorter individuals are scarcely,
it at all, distinguishable from the slenderer principal styl.
Loc.—-Port Phillip (Austr. Mus. Coll.).
OPHLITASPONGIA CHALINOIDES, Carter.
(Fig. 59-)
1885. Axinella chalinoides, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5),
XVI OOS pe sgo:
1886. Axinella chalinoides, var. cribrosa, Carter, Op. cit., (5),
Xvill., 1886, p. 358.
Sponge stipitate, ramose; branches usually somewhat
compressed, about g mm. in lesser diameter, multiplying
dichotomously or sometimes polytomously, and occa-
sionally uniting by anastomosis. Oscula, chiefly in two
rows on opposite sides of the branches, usually more or
less concealed by an extension across them of the thin
dermal membrane. Skeleton composed of well-developed
horny fibres (60 p in diameter), forming a _ small-
meshed irregular to subrectangular reticulation. Main
fibres provided with a meagre core of loosely and some-
what plumosely arranged small (principal) styli; connect-
ing fibres with one or a few spicules uniserially arranged.
The terminal spicules of the main fibres project slightly
beyond the extremity of the fibre, but there is no special
development of superficial tufts of spicules as in O.
axinelloides. Quasi-echinating spicules somewhat scarce.
Auxiliary spicules (styli) are scattered interstitially in
considerable number, accompanied by a few principal
styli; they become more abundant close beneath the
surface (here lying parallel with the main fibres), and in
the dermal membrane, where they lie horizontally.
Megascleres :—(i) Principal styli (rarely oxea) straight,
cylindrical throughout the greater part of their length,
and gradually tapering to a sharp point, 75 to 110 pt in
length, and, in different specimens, from 3 to 5.5 } in
maximum diameter ; (ii.) auxiliary styli straight or flexed,
cylindrical to within a short distance of the pointed end,
120 to 195 # long, and up to 2.5 ¢ in diameter.
SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 271
This species has been written by Dendy! as a possible
synonym of O. subhispida—though there is little in the des-
criptions of the two that would suggest
an identity. However, in the Austra-
lian Museum collection of Port Phillip
sponges there are five specimens, in
external appearance much resembling |
a Chalina, which—if allowance be made
for certain differences attributable to
differences in condition of preservation
—agree so well with the description of
Axinella chalinoides, var. cribrosa, that
I feel no hesitation in identifying them
as such. These also agree equally well
with the typical A. chalinoides, save
that, concerning the latter, auxiliary
megascleres have not been mentioned ; b
but these spicules might easily be over-
looked, and I therefore regard it as
extremely probable that A. chalinoides
and its so-called variety are the same.
melemnansmalainges
One of the five specimens, which is
dry and dermally denuded, has com-
pressed dichotomous’ branches and
many marginally-situated shallow
crateriform oscula, each of which forms
the common orifice of several (usually
three or four) excurrent canals opening
into its base. In the remaining speci- _ Fig. 59—O. chal-
mens, preserved in alcohol, the tnovdes. a Princi-
branches are either cylindrical or com- ir bes a a
. ~ : iliary stylus.
pressed and, owing to rapidly repeated
dichotomy, sometimes appear to divide
polytomously; and the oscula which
are not entirely confined to opposite sides of the branches,
are more or less concealed from view by a covering membrane
or diaphragm, continuous with the thin though well-defined
dermal membrane. The oscula diaphragms may be (ap-
parently) entire, or may have a small central circular aperture ;
sometimes, owing probably to collapse, they are depressed
below the general surface, and are then in a few cases radially
wrinkled. Immediately beneath the thin transparent dermal
membrane are numerous subdermal spaces or lacunz, which
can be seen to lead by rather large circular pores into the in-
current canals. To these lacunz and pores is due, probably, a
1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 36.
272 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
certain uneven and pitted condition of the surface in the dry
specimen mentioned above; but when, as in the other speci-
mens, the dermal membrane is intact, the surface is generally
free from inequalities.
With regard to the oscula in the specimens examined by
him, Carter says concerning A. chalinoides, that they are
‘‘often accompanied by a stelliform radiation,’’ due to ‘‘col-
lapse of the dermal sarcode over subjacent excretory canals’’
immediately surrounding them; and concerning A. chalinoides,
var. cribrosa, that they are ‘‘deeply sunk into the tissue and
rendered stelliform by grooves radiating from them to the
surface.’’ Although in the case of the present specimens no
such appearance is exhibited, the facts concerning them to
which I have referred, render it conceivable that this is due
merely to difference in condition of preservation.
The arrangement of the fibres is very similar to that of O.
axinelloides, but the meshes are of more uniform size. Oxeote
modifications of the principal megascleres have been observed,
but they are rare. The slenderer principal megascleres are
scarcely or not at all distinguishable from the shorter auxiliary
megascleres.
Loc.—Port Phillip, Victoria (Carter; Austr. Mus. Coll.).
OPHLITASPONGIA TUBULOSA, sp. nov.
(Plate xxxv., fie. 3, and’ fig. Go.)
Sponge with the habit and texture of Siphonochalina ;
sessile, with short erect tubes arranged in panpipe-like
series. Surface even. Skeleton a tolerably regular reti-
culation of slender, though tough and dense, horny
fibres; the main fibres only, are very sparsely cored with
straight stylote and (very rare) oxeote spicules, cylin-
drical to within a short distance of the pointed extremity,
and attaining to a maximum size of 120 x 4 4. Quasi-
echinating spicules of like kind are of occasional occur-
vence. Scattered interstitially, though chiefly or entirely
confined to membranes stretched between the fibres, are
(relatively) moderately abundant megascleres of perhaps
two kinds, viz.: (i.) Straight styli (and rare oxea) of
similar shape to those of the fibres, but usually much
longer, and somewhat slenderer, with a maximum size of
220 x 3.5 w; and (ii.) very slender flexuous styli and oxea
attaining a maximum length of about 260 y. Microscleres
absent.
SPONGES.—-HALLMANN. 273
This species is represented by two dry and washed-out speci-
mens. The sponge, which is attached by an encrusting basal
disc, consists of a clustered mass of short erect tubes which
multiply both by branching and by the upgrowth of new ones
from the base. Branching takes place, typically, in such a
way as to give rise to an arrangement of the tubes side by side
in singie, longer or shorter, series. The component tubes of
each such series may fuse with each other laterally so as to
form a plate with the tube-orifices in a single row along its
upper margin, or they are more or less free from one another
except at their bases. Anastomosis occurs freely wherever
tubes of the same or different series come
into contact. The two specimens are ap-
proximately equal in size: the slightly
larger is 75 mm. high and 100 mm. by 65
mm. broad. The free terminal portions of
the tubes in no case exceed 20 mm. in
length, and are 6 to 10 mm. in external,
and 3 to 5 mm. in internal, diameter. The
pseudoscula are of the same diameter as
the otubes anternally.—) ihe itexture: yas
shown by washed-out specimens, 1s
similar to that of a Chalinine sponge. As \)
regards consistency, the sponge is com-
pressible and elastic, and fairly tough.
The colour varies, even in different por-
tions of the same specimen, from brownish-
yellow to dark-brown.
The skeleton is a wide-meshed reticula-
tion of densely horny fibres of a deep
brownish-yellow colour, of which only the
main fibres contain a slender core of pauci-
serially (or sometimes even uniserially)
arranged small spicules. The main fibres Fig. 60—O. tubu-
may (rarely) attain to 80 » in stoutness, joc” a Principal
but are usually less than 60 yp; the dia- styli—the shorter,
meter of the connecting fibres varies from intrafibral; the
10 to about 40 wp. The former are dis- longer, interstitial.
tinguishable into two categories which pg) UBSUEIS ai
might be termed, respectively, primary j
and secondary (or excurrent) main fibres, viz.: (i.) those
which ramify over the inner surface of the pseudoscular tubes
and form, with the aid of connecting fibres, a strong, irregu-
larly-meshed, supporting reticulation; and (ii.) those which,
arising as branches from the preceding, traverse the tube-wall
obliquely upwards and outwards to the exterior surface. The
last-mentioned, or secondary main fibres, rarely branch; but,
274 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
towards the outer surface, they are supplemented by the inter-
polation of others which arise from their connecting fibres.
Their connecting fibres either may be simple, forming direct
transverse connections between them—in which case the re-
ticulation is more or less rectangular—or, less frequently, may
branch and interunite, thus forming between them an interre-
ticulation, and rendering the pattern of the skeleton irregular.
The fibres are here and there, at very wide intervals, echinated
by spicules (similar to those within the fibres) which, as a rule,
project but slightly beyond the spongin. The meshes of the
reticulation are tympanized by very thin membranes (visible,
perhaps, only in washed-out specimens) in which moderately
abundant slender spicules lie scattered.
There is no indication, in the present condition of the speci-
mens, of a dermal membrane or of a dermal skeleton. The
main fibres terminate abruptly at the surface with their end-
spicules projecting slightly beyond the spongin.
Spicules.—Microscleres are absent ; the megascleres are, for
the purpose of description, separable into three groups :—
(i.) The spicules of the fibres, straight styli, cylindrical
to within a short distance of their pointed extremity,
ranging in length from 80 to about 120 #, and rarely
slightly more than 4 in diameter; occasionally an
oxea is found amongst them.
Straight or but slightly flexed interstitial spicules,
identical in form with the preceding, but mostly much
longer, attaining to a length of 220, and not more
than 3.5 #4 in diameter. Oxeote modifications of these
occur more frequently than amongst the fibral spi-
cules but are nevertheless comparatively rare.
(ii.
2
(iii.) Variously curved and flexuous, very slender, intersti-
tial spicules, about equal in abundance to those of
the second group, frequently exhibiting oxeote modi-
fications, seldom exceeding 1.5} in diameter, and of
very variable length; the longest observed measured
264 pl.
The identity in form of the spicules of the first two groups
and the complete transition between them in the matter of size,
permit of no other conclusion than that they are but partially
differentiated derivatives of an originally single spicule-form.
I regard them as homologous with the principal megascleres
of other species. Whether the spicules of the third group are
merely variants of the same, or whether they are represent-
ative of auxiliary megascleres, I am unable to decide.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 275
O. tubulosa, regarded as a species of Ophlitaspongia, seems
to me rather divergent. In a number of respects it bears
analogies with Siphonochalina bispiculata, Dendy,! and is
possibly related thereto.
Loc.—South-east coast of Australia (‘‘Endeavour’’).
GENUS ECHINOCLATHRIA, Carter.
External form various; sponge made up of a honey-
comb-like mass of anastomosing flattened trabeculae.
Skeleton—except, perhaps, when foreign particules are
included in excessive abundance—a reticulation of fibres
usually well provided with spongin. Megascleres of two
kinds, distinguishable into principal and auxiliary; the
former are smooth styli, typically occurring in association
with the fibres as coring or echinating ¢ spicules ; the latter,
which vary in form from tylotornota to amphistrongyla,
occur interstitially. Microscleres may be present in the
form of palmate isochele.
The above, which is an adaptation of the original diagnosis
proposed by Ridley and Dendy, is designed so as to secure on
the one hand the exclusion from the genus of such species as
FE. glabra, R. and D., and on the other the admission into it
of the species of Lendenfeld’s genus Aulena.2 The modifica-
tion of the definition in these respects introduces no innova-
tion, for Thiele’ has already expressed the probably correct
opinion (vide p. 288) that E. glabra belongs to his genus
Echinochalina, and Dendy,‘ by his inclusion in Echinoclathria
of a species of Aulena has tacitly rejected the latter genus.
Speaking of Echinoclathria and Aulena in the sense in
which they would be understood if maintained as separate
genera, it may be said that although each of the species of
Aulena departs in several noteworthy respects from those of
Echinoclathria, yet they possess in common no single charac-
ter of recognised systematic value by which they may be
distinguished from the latter, unless it be their habit of includ-
ing foreign particles in the skeleton. In other words, the
separation of the two genera depends ultimately upon the
presence or absence of extraneous skeletal elements. Similarly,
1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vii. (n.s), 1895, p. 246.
2 Lendenfeld—Monograph of the Horny Sponges, 1888, p. 91.
3 Thiele—Kieselschwamme von Ternate, ii., 1903, p. 962.
4 Dendy— Echinoclathria arenifera, Proc. Roy. Soe. Vict., 1896, p. 40.
276 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIO RESULTS.
Echinoclathria is ultimately separable from Ophlitaspongia
only by virtue of its characteristic honeycomb-like structure ;
for although the auxiliary spicules of the former are typically
quasi-diactinal, yet in E. carteri, as in the species of Ophlita-
spongia, they are stylote. This structural peculiarity of
Echinoclathria (and of Aulena) is, however, theoretically of
questionable generic value, inasmuch as it is probably nothing
more than the extreme specialisation of a not uncommon mode
of growth, and is, in fact, actually attained in other genera
in the case of Plectispa macropora and certain species of
Echinochalina. Consequently, whether the proposal might be
to merge Echinoclathria and Aulena in Ophlitaspongia or to
keep all three genera distinct, no serious objection could in
either case be raised, but the more reasonable course seems
to be to regard the series of forms which they embrace as con-
stituting two genera, with the line of division falling between
Ophlitaspongia and Echinocluthria rather than between Echi-
noclathria and Aulena.
I might here remark that the peculiar genus Allantophora,
Whitelegge,! which its author regarded as intermediate be-
tween Ophlitaspongia and Echinoclathria, offers no justifica-
tion for its retention amongst the Myxillinze, and perhaps had
better be placed, provisionally, with the Mycaline. In its
microscleric characters, the genus—which is represented by
but a single species—stands unique; but of known forms it
perhaps most nearly approaches the equally peculiar Crambe
crambe, O. Schmidt.? Apart from a certain amount of
similarity in the formation of their fibres, an argument in
favour of a relationship between the two lies in the possibility
of an homology between the desmoids of Crambe and the
microstrongyles of Allantophora. I cannot agree with White-
legge that in A. plicata, the so-called echinating spicules are in
any way different from those of the fibre-axis.
ECHINOCLATHRIA FAVUS (Carter), Ridley and Dendy.
(Fig. 61.)
1885. Echinoclathria favus, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5),
KVijwtOOS, Pseege-
1887. Echinoclathria favus, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger”’
Monaxonida, 1887,,p..200, pl: xxxi-) les 4 sna.
1 Whitelegge—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1907, p. 505.
2 Thiele—Arch. f. Naturg., 1899, p. 87.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 277
Sponge massive or branched, commonly growing upon
the shell of a Pecten. The superficial lamelle present
their edges to the exterior, forming cells of irregular,
often elongate and meandrine, shape; these cells vary in
width, in any given specimen, from about 2 to 6 mm.
The main fibres are sparsely cored; the connecting fibres
are usually aspiculous. Echinating spicules are not
wholly confined, as is usually the case
in other species, to the external aspect
of the superficial connecting fibres.
Auxiliary spicules moderately abun-
dant. Megascleres:—(i.) Principal
styli straight, fusiform, with greatest
diameter about the middle of their
length—size, 75-105 x 5 p; (ii.) aux-
iliary strongyla ranging in length
from (rarely less than) 135 to 170 1,
and seldom as much as 1.5 y in dia-
meter. Microscleres :—Isochele pal-
mat@, scarce, of extreme tenuity, 8 to
12.5 jt long.
Four specimens of this species were
obtained, all of which encrust the shells of
living Pectens. They very closely re-
semble in external appearance the speci-
men shown in Pl. xxxi., fig. 4, of the
‘Challenger’? Report. There is nothing
of importance that I can add to Ridley
and Dendy’s description except that I
have found the auxiliary spicules to be
invariably strongyla.
Locs.—Bass Strait, off Moncceur Is-
land, 38 fm. (‘‘Challenger’’); off Devon-
port, Tasmania (‘‘Endeavour’’).
ECHINOCLATHRIA RAMOSA, Sp.
Fig. 61—Z. favus.
a Principai style.
b Auxiliary stron-
gyle. (Chela not
figured.)
nov.
(Blate*xxx:, fig. 3, and fies 62:)
1go1. Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Rec. Austr.
Mus. ;iVs,)2; 1901; pp. 89, 1x7;
[Not Plectispa macropora, Lendenfeld, Austr. Mus.
Cat. Sponges, 1888, p. 226. |
[Not Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Austr.
Mus. Mem-, iv., 10, 1907, p. 504. |
Shrubby substipitate sponges, with short cylindrical or
but slightly compressed branches (averaging about 10
mm. in diameter) which multiply dichotomously and
8 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
to
NJ
usually anastomose freely. The superficial lamella
present their edges to the exterior. The superficial ‘‘cell-
apertures’’ are polygonal or slightly rounded, averaging
about 2 mm. in diameter. Main fibres with a pauci-
spicular core; connecting fibres usually vacant. Echin-
ating spicules (apparently) confined to the superficial
fibres. Auxiliary megascleres rather scarce. Mega-
scleres :—(1.) Principal styli, straight, with a sub-basal
waist or constriction, usually slightly fusiform, varying
in size in different specimens from 70-95 x 5 # to go-120
x & p; (i.) auxiliary strongyla, with a maximum length of
between 140 and 160 jt, and a maximum diameter of
between 1.2 and 2 #. Miucroscleres :—Isochele palmate,
vare (or absent ?).
Reasons for regarding this species as distinct from Len-
denfeld’s Plectispa macropora are indicated in the remarks on
the genus Plectispa.
It is a low, generally profusely branched and shrubby sponge
with a much. “aUIR AED iated stalk, the base of which often is
extended into a disc-like foot; the first-formed branches some-
times take origin from the disc, and the sponge may then ap-
pear as if provided with several stalks. The basal portion
of the sponge, just as are the branches, is formed of reticulat-
ing lamella. Branching takes place by dichotomy which, as a
rule, is rapidly repeated. The sponge, as growth proceeds,
typically assumes the form of a hemispherical cluster of short
freely anastomosing branches; occasionally, owing to a re-
duction of the tendency towards rapid branching - the branches
become more elongated, anastomosis is less frequent and the
sponge assumes a more erect and arborescent habit. The
largest of a considerable number of specimens measures 150
mm. in height and 200 x 130mm. in transverse dimensions.
The longest unbranched branches met with in any specimen,
measured 7 mm. in length. (The species recorded as E.
macro pora bg Whitelegge in his report on the ‘‘Thetis”’
sponges, in which the branches sometimes attain a length of
over 300 mm., and the sponge a height of 500 mm., is E.
carteri, R. and D.)
The superficial lamelle do not, as a rule, stand quite per-
pendicularly to the general surface, but are directed somewhat
obliquely forwards, i.e., in the direction of growth of the
branches; their outer edges are usually somewhat jagged.
The superficial ‘‘cell apertures’? are normally hexagonal, but
in some specimens, particularly when the branches are com-
pressed, they show a tendency to become elongated in the
direction of the branch-axis; they average slightly less than
2 mm., and rarely exceed 2.5 mm., in diameter.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 27
Judging from the rather abundant material at my disposal,
it would seem that decrease in the frequency of branching and
anastomosis, increase in the length of branches and the as-
sumption of a more erect habit, the tendency of branches to
become compressed, of cell-apertures to become elongated,
and of the external edges of the superficial lamelle to become
jagged—are concomitant variations.
The sponge is of fibrous texture, and, in the dry state,
tough and resilient. Some specimens are of an intense purplish
colour owing to the presence of a sym-
biotic alga ; “otherwise the colour of the
dry sponge varies between yellowish-
grey and pale brown.
The skeleton is a compact reticulation
of slender horny fibres readily distin-
guishable into main and connecting.
The main fibres, which run (in approxi-
mate parallelism) in the direction of
growth of the lamella, contain a meagre
core of (principal) styli; at the outer a
or growing edge of any lamella, their
terminal spicules form a slightly pro-
jecting tuft. The connecting fibres to
some extent interreticulate irregularly
between the main fibres and are usually
aspiculous. The echinating — styli,
which—contrary to the statement of
Whitelegge—are in no way different
from those within the fibres, appear to
be entirely confined to the outer side of Fig. 62—£. ramosa
the fibres which lie immediately beneath 2 Principal styles. —b
the lateral surfaces of the lamellae. The “"*!#ary strongyle.
auxiliary megascleres are strongyla
not subtylostvli, as previously stated.
In none of the specimens which I have examined have I been
able to detect chele. Whitelegge, however, has observed ‘‘in
well-preserved specimens’’ a few scattered isochele to} in
length.
A point worthy of special note is the relatively great varia-
bility in the maximum size (95 x 5 to 120 x 8) of the principal
megascleres ; and in reference thereto I might mention that,
between specimens which showed the opposite extremes in this
particular, I have been unable to discern any difference what-
ever in external characters
Hab.—Coast of New South Wales, in shallow water (Austr.
Mus. Coll.).
280 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
ECHINOCLATHRIA ARBOREA, Lendenfeld.
(Plate cxix:, “hig.'2, and ip. 103°)
1888. Plectispa arborea, Lendenfeld, Cat. Sponges Austr.
Mus., 1888, p. 226.
[Not Clathria (Plectispa) arborea, Whitelegge, Rec.
Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 88. |
1901. Echinoclathria elegans, Whitelegge, Loc. cit., p. 90.
[Not Plectispa elegans, Lendenfeld, Cat. Sponges
Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 226. |
Sponge stipitate, arborescent, branching dichoto-
mously; branches elongated, cylindrical, averaging 7
mm. in diameter, seldom anastomosing. The superficial
cell-apertures are not bounded by lamell@ disposed edge-
wise to the surface: normally, they are circular or oval
in outline, and, on the average, are less than 2 mm. in
width and about the same distance apart; but in some
specimens the trabecule are rod-shaped, and the structure
is then no longer cellular, but clathrate. Main fibres
with a paucispicular core; connecting fibres either with
uniserially arranged spicules, or vacant. Echinating
spicules most abundant upon, but not restricted to, the
superficial fibres. Auxiliary megascleres variable in
number, sometimes rather scarce. Megascleres (similar
in form to those of E. ramosa) :—(i.) Principal styli vary-
ing in maximum size in dijferent specimens from 100 x
5.5to 120 x 7 p; (ii.) auxiliary strongyles, maximum size,
135 x 1.3. Chele (apparently) absent.
Introductory.—I have already pointed out (p. 204) that the
sponge identified by Whitelegge as Plectispa elegans 1s cer-
tainly not that species, and have indicated the chief reasons
for regarding it as identical with Lendenfeld’s Plectispa
arborea. These reasons perhaps require to be more explicitly
stated. Concerning Plectispa arborea, Lendf., one can draw
the conclusion from what Lendenfeld has written, that the
species is possessed of a structure in some way analogous to
that which is characteristic of Echinoclathria—and, more par-
ticularly, of such species as E. ramosa: for the sponge is
described as ‘‘dendritically ramifying ;’’ and in the diagnosis of
the genus Plectispa we are told that the sponges belonging
thereto are ‘‘elegantly reticulate.’’ The account of its spicu-
lation also, lends support to the opinion that the species
belongs to Echinoclathria. Consequently, considerable im-
portance attaches to the statement that the sponge has—an
unusual feature amongst the species of Echinoclathria—a
‘‘clearly-defined stem.’’ As to the precise nature of the reticu-
lar structure of P. arborea, the description omits to inform us:
the omission, however, affords reason for supposing that the
external appearance of the sponge is, at any rate, not altogether
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 281
such as would suggest the term ‘‘honeycomb-like,’’ inasmuch
as Lendenfeld expressly uses this term, apparently in a dis-
tinctive way, in connection with another of his three species of
Plectispa (viz., P. macropora). To sum up, we may say that
the evidence is greatly in favour of the supposition that P.
arborea is a species of Echinoclathria, peculiar in the posses-
sion of a well-defined stem and in the
lack (owing probably to the manner of
arrangement of the trabecule) of an
external appearance resembling that of
honeycomb. Since it is precisely in
these respects that the specimens of
Whitelegge’s Echinoclathria elegans
are distinguished from the sponges of
the remaining known species of Echino-
clathria, it is without hesitation that I
here further describe them, with the a
addition of figures, under the name of
E. arborea, Lendf.
Description.—In its skeletal char-
acters generally, including the size and
form of the spicules, this species shows
no points of difference from E. ramosa.
Like the latter, also, it is invariably of
ramose habit; but the branches are
relatively fewer and longer, and the
sponge, therefore, is arborescent—not
shrub-like. The essential differences .
between the two species lie in the aan Ae he
a a Principal styles. b
character of the stalk and the form and auxiliary strongyle.
disposition ot the trabecule.
The stalk is peculiar in the fact that it is structurally dif-
ferent from the branches—being almost or, sometimes, even
quite solid; its condition in certain cases, however, indicates
that the non-trabecular structure is secondary. The foot of the
stalk usually spreads out into a disc of attachment: in the
specimen described by Lendenfeld, this would seem to have
been unusually large—‘‘an extensive basal plate, slightly com-
pressed, and about 8 mm. thick.”’
The trabecule of the branches are normally more or less
lamellar, but are relatively much stouter than in other species.
Occasionally, in parts of a specimen, or even throughout an
entire specimen, they are cylindrical, rod-shaped; and, ac-
cordingly, in such cases, the structural character typical of
Echinoclathria is widely departed from. When the trabecule
are lamellar, those which are situate at the surface of the
sponge are not disposed edgewise to the exterior, as in other
species, but are directed tangentially, and form wide
282 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
“‘borders’’ between perfectly rounded (circular or oval) ‘‘cell-
apertures :’’ the effect is analogous to that which would be
produced in a species (like E. rotunda) with large ‘‘cells’’
separated by vertical lamellez, if the outer edge of the lamella
were to expand into a broad horizontal flange, thus concealing
the lamellae themselves and reducing the size of the ‘‘cell-
apertures.”’
Of the half-dozen specimens in the Australian Museum, the
largest (shown in PI. xxix., fig. 2) is that which Whitelegge
(loc. cit.) mistakenly supposed to be the type of Plectispa
elegans; it measures 230mm. in height, and is thus not so
tall as the largest of Lendenfeld’s specimens, which measured
300mm. In the dry state, the sponge varies in colour from
brownish-grey to dark brown, and is of compressible and
elastic consistency ; there is some peculiarity in the texture of
the sponge which produces a ‘‘soft’’ appearance, suggesting
that of felt. Whitelegge’s statement that the sponge is
‘rather brittle when dry,”’ is true only of his ‘‘type’’ specimen,
mentioned above; the brittleness in this case appears to be due
to decay. Both Lendenfeld and Whitelegge have stated that
the echinating styli are shorter than those which core the
fibres; I fail, however, to find any difference between them.
Also I find that the auxiliary megascleres are invariably
strongyla—not subtylostyli, as stated by Whitelegge.
Locs.-—The species is known only from two closely situated
localities, Port Jackson and Tuggerah Beach.
ECHINOCLATHRIA ROTUNDA, sp. nov.
(Plate xxx., fig. 1, and fig. 64.)
Sponge oval or pear-shaped, unbranched, symmetrical.
The lamelle throughout are arranged parallely to the
lines of growth of the sponge, and at the surface, accord-
ingly, are disposed edgewise to the exterior; in the inner
region of the sponge they are elongated and so form the
partition-walls of radially disposed tubes. External ‘‘cell-
apertures’’ hexagonal or (occasionally) elongate, on the
average about 4 mm. in width. Skeleton consisting of
subparallel multi- or pauci-spicular main fibres joined by
interreticulating uni- and a-spicular connecting fibres.
Echinating styli plentiful, confined to the outer aspect of
the fibres. Scattered auxiliary spicules fairly abundant ;
interstitial principal styli scarce. Megascleres: GQ.)
Principal styli, straight, with slight sub- basal waist when
fully grown, subfusiform in younger stages, size 80 to 125
x 7-5 pW; (ii.) auxiliary amphistrongyla, or occasionally
subtylostrongyla, size 120 to 170 x 2 4. Microscleres :—
Slender isochele palmate, moderately abundant, g to
12 # long.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 282
This species is represented by two specimens, the larger of
which is 1oomm. high, 30 mm. in diameter at the base, and
65mm. in diameter near its upper extremity where it is
broadest. The lamellae are thin and somewhat parchment-like,
and, in keeping with the sym-
metrical shape of the sponge,
display a marked uniformity )
of arrangement, being so dis-
posed that their planes lie
parallel to imaginary lines
radiating upward with an
outward curvature from the
sponge-base to the _ free
periphery. The — superficial
lamellz enclose between them
usually hexagonal ‘‘cells,”’
averaging 4 mm. in diameter ; Pee hs 5 4
occasionally, however, owing
to the incompletion (or non-
formation) of intervening
lamella, several adjoining
‘‘cells’’ may, so to speak,
run into one. In the interior
of the sponge the lamelle are ¢
relatively long and thus give
rise to a tubular structure;
in the outer portions of the
pe . = apie
ees ae ee Fig. 64—L£chinoclathria rotunda,
short an rind a more Open 4 Principal styles. b Auxiliary
reuculation. strongyles. c Isochela palmata.
With regard to skeletal
characters, there is nothing of
importance which might be added to what has been mentioned
in the diagnosis, except that the fibres within the lamellze
1 The regularity of the arrangement of the lamelle in this species
enables one to perceive more readily than in the other species herein
described, the mode of growth by which the characteristic Ecihnoclathrian
structure is attained. The formation of new tissue appears to be con-
fined chiefly, if not entirely, to the peripheral region of the sponge, an¢
proceeds in two ways—(i.) by the outward growth, at their outer edge,
of the superficial lamelle; and (ii.) by the formation of new lamelle.
Growth of the first kind increases not only the external dimensions of the
sponge, but also, owing to the convexity of its surface, the size of the
superficial “‘cell-apertures.’”’ Outward growth of the edge of any given
lamella appears to be limited, or, at least, intermittent; and this cessa-
tion of growth of now one, now another. of the superficial lamelle, results
in the confluence of adjoining ‘‘cells,’’ and thus is also, indirectly, a cause
of cell-enlargement. The formation of new lamellze counteracts this in-
crease in size of the ‘“‘cell apertures;’”’ each lamella arises, as a tongue-
or strap-shaped process, at or near the outer edge of an older superficial
lamella—particularly one forming the longer side of an elongated cell—
and, growing across the cell aperture, forms at first a narrow septum,
dividing it into two. Thereafter, its further increase of size is effected
by outward growth along its exterior edge, i.e., in a direction at right
angles to its earliest direction of growth.
284 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
appear, not to form a tri-dimensional reticulation, as in the
preceding species, but, in keeping with the thinness of the
lamella, to reticulate in a single plane.
Loc.—South coast of Australia; exact locality unknown
(‘‘Endeavour’’).
ECHINOCLATHRIA CARTERI, Ridley and Dendy.
(Fig. 65.)
1887. Echinoclathnia cartert, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger”’
Monaxonida, 1887, ps 11625) Pls xxix. ies. 12s aiaae
PI exXsci.,, figs. 25, 3a:
1907. Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Austr. Mus.
Miem.); 1V.,° 10,0897, p. 504:
[Not Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Rec.
Austr. Mus:;iv., 2,(1901, pp.-So, 1175 |
Sponge (unless young) ramose, probably astipitate and
basally encrusting; branches cylindrical, growing to a
considerable length. Lamelle thin; superficial lamelle,
as a rule, disposed edgewise to the exterior. Superficial
““cell-apertures’’ rounded or polygonal, 2 to 3 mm. in
width. Skeleton a very irregular small-meshed reticula-
tion, apparently in one plane (as in E. rotunda), consist-
ing of pauci- and wni-spicular (or, rarely, aspicular)
spongin-fibres, together with a few multispicular fibres
poor in spongin. The outlines of the fibres are indistinct,
owing to interstitial membranes, and the pattern of the
skeleton much obscured by the abundance of irregularly
scattered (principal and auxiliary) spicules. Echinating
styli plentiful, almost entirely restricted to the exterior
aspect of the fibres. Megascleres:—(i.) Principal styli
straight, subconical when fully grown, slightly fusiform
in their early stages, 95 to about 150 wu in length, and at
the most to y in diameter; (ti.) somewhat tornotely
pointed, cylindrical, auxiliary styli or subtylostyli, rang-
ing in length from (rarely less than) 120 to 160 yp, and in
diameter up to 2.5 . Microscleres :—Isochele palmate,
fairly plentiful, 9 to 15 (usually not more than 13) » long.
In the Australian Museum are some half-dozen specimens of
a sponge which I identify as Echinoclathria carteri. These
agree among themselves, but differ slightly in four respects
from the original specimens as described. In the latter, the
‘“‘anastomosing trabecule usually present a flat surface to-
wards the outside,’’ the maximum size of the principal styli is
132 x 9}, the auxiliary spicules are basally subtylote and the
chele attain a length of 15; in the present specimens the
superficial trabecule (although often disposed obliquely to the
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 285
surface) present their edges to the exterior, the principal styli
(although in some instances rarely exceeding 130 in length)
are in no case less than 145 x 9 }! in
size, only a very small proportion of the
auxiliary styli are basally enlarged, and
the chele are never more than 13 #
long.
These specimens were obtained by the
‘“Thetis’’ Expedition and were recorded
an inexplicable error—as_ Echino-
clathria macropora (= FE. ramosa, nom.
nov.). They differ externally from
specimens of the latter species in their
relatively few and elongated branches,
which in one case reach a length of 400
mm. Owing to incompleteness, none
of them affords any clue as to the mode
of fixation, whether by means of a stalk
or otherwise. A single small specimen
(obtained by the ‘‘Endeavour’’) encrust-
ing, and growing between, the lower
portions of the branches of a_ horny
coral, agrees perfectly in skeletal char-
acters with the “‘Thetis’’ specimens. It
would appear, therefore, that this
species, like E. favus, is of variable Fig. 65—£. cartert.
habit. a Principal style. b
Auxiliary tornostron-
Locs.—Neighbourhood of Port Jack- gyle. c¢ Isochela pal-
son, 15 to 52 fms. (‘‘Challenger,’’ meta.
‘‘Thetis’’); Shoalhaven Bight, 15 to
45 fms. (‘‘Thetis,’’ ‘‘Endeavour’’); south-east Australia, 120
fms., and Bass Strait, 38 fms. (‘‘Challenger’’).
ECHINOCLATHRIA GIGANTEA, Lendenfeld.
1886. Halme gigantea, varr. macropora, intermedia, et
micropora, Lendenfeld, Proc. Linn. Soc. New South
Wales, x., 1886, p. 847.
1888. Aulena gigantea, varr. macropora, etc., Cat. Sponges
Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 228.
1889. Aulena gigantea, varr. macropora, etc., Lendenfeld,
Monograph of the Horny Sponges, 1889, p. 97, pl.
Witietiosa 3.04, 758, 18, 195 pl. ix.) mes) 2-4.
igo1. Aulena gigantea, var. micropora, Whitelegge, Rec.
AUStoaN erty. 2, TOOL, p. O2..anG pe 1LS:
1907. Aulena gigantea, var. micropora, Whitelegge, Mem.
Austr. Mus.,.iv., 10, 1907, p. 504.
286 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
From examination of numerous specimens of this species,
brought together from many localities, I find that its sub-
division into three varieties, as proposed by Lendenfeld, cannot
be maintained. So far as I am able.to judge, the specimens
being without exception preserved in a dry state, Lendenfeld’s
very full account of the external and skeletal structure, is
substantially correct; but it falls short in reference to ‘the
great variability display ed, not only in the size of the meshes
formed by the reticulating lamella, but also in the degree of
dev elopment of the spicules both in point of size and number.
Thus, to take first the case of the spicules:
(i.) The styli vary in maximum size in different specimens
from 70 x 3p to 115 x 7p, their range of length (7.e., the
difference between the longest and shortest) i in any given speci-
men being about two- fifths of the length of the longest. The
greater the size of these spicules, the greater apparently 1s
their relative abundance; in some specimens in which they are
of least size, their number is extremely small. In shape they
are normally very similar to the styli of E. (Aulena) crassa,
as depicted by Lendenfeld (op. cit., pl. vill., figs. 20, 21), but
as a rule they are not quite So) abruptly pointed as these:
always, however, a certain proportion of them approach more
or less to the conical form represented by Lendenfeld (loc. cit.,
pl. viii., fig. 18) as characteristic for the variety intermedia
(and presumably, therefore, for the species). In none of the
specimens that I have examined have I found a preponderance
of conically-shaped spicules, and I therefore regard Lenden-
feld’s figures as misleading to the extent that they convey the
impression of a difference. between FE. gigantea ‘and E. laxa
in the forms of their styli.
(ii.) The auxiliary spicules vary in different specimens from
140 to 195 # in maximum length, and from 2 to 4 in maxi-
mum diameter. In some specimens they are rather rare; in
others comparatively abundant: also, their number relatively
to that of the styli varies greatly. They are, in general,
stoutest in the case of specimens in which they are most
abundant, and vice versa; their stoutness, however, varies, to
some extent at least, independently of their length. A peculiar
point in connection with these spicules is the fact that whereas
in some specimens they are almost exclusively tornostyles, in
others they are almost exclusively amphistrongyles; in this
respect the species resembles Echinochalina anomala, sp. nov.
From Lendenfeld’s description one would suppose the
spicule to be invariably a strongyle; but, as a matter of
fact, specimens with strongyles appear to be the exception.
So far I have met with no specimen in which there was any
approach to equality in number of the two forms of the
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 287
spicule ; but, as in Echinochalina reticulata (text-fig. 66), there
usually occur in any specimen transitional forms between the
tornostyles and strongyles.
In the three varieties (macropora, intermedia and micropora)
distinguished by Lendenfeld, the greatest width of the meshes
enclosed by the reticulating lamella were stated to be 7 mm.,
5 mm. and 3 mm. respectively ; but, as mentioned above, there
is great variability in this respect, and even in single speci-
mens I have found the meshes to vary in width so much as
from 4 to 13 mm.
Lendenfeld has described in his Monograph two other
species of Aulena, A. laxa and A. crassa. The sponges of the
former species, regarded by Lendenfeld as embracing two
varieties—the types of which, I suppose, are in the British
Museum—will possibly prove to be merely growth-forms of
FE. gigantea; according to the original descriptions of the
species, auxiliary megascleres are absent, but in two Aus-
tralian Museum specimens which Lendenfeld has identified as
A. laxa, and which presumably are two of those referred to
by him under that name in his Catalogue (1888), I find
scattered auxiliary strongyla.
Aulena crassa, of which I have examined specimens that
come from the type-locality (Port Phillip) and agree very well
with the description, is quite distinct from E. gigantea and
presumably also from FE. arenifera;! its chief distinguishing
features are the concealment from external view of its ‘‘cell-
apertures’’ by a covering membrane, and its brittleness and
friability in the dry state. Its correct name may be accepted
for the present as Echinoclathria crassa, Lendenfeld (non
Carter) ; but the specific name perhaps should be altered, since
the Holopsamma crassa® of Carter, with which Lendenfeld
partly identified the species, is evidently more entitled to be
identified with and to confer its name upon the sponge now
known as Psammopemma crassum.
Locs.—The specimens in the Australian Museum Collection
were collected from various parts of the New South Wales
coast from Jervis Bay on the south to Sandon Bluffs on the
north; a number of specimens were obtained by the ‘‘Endea-
vour’’ at the last-mentioned locality at a depth of 35-40 fms.
Specimens are very commonly found upon the beaches after
storms. Lendenfeld records the species also from Port Phillip,
Victoria, and from Fremantle, Western Australia.
1 Carter—Ann Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 350; Dendy—Proc. Roy.
Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p 40.
2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xv., 1884, p. 211.
288 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS
ECHINOCHALINA, Thiele (emend).
1903. Echinochalina, Thiele, Kieselschwamme von Ternate,
it, 1963. (Pp. GOT:
Sponge of various habit; in some cases, like Echino-
clathria, consisting of a honeycomb-like reticulation of
thin lamella. Skeletona reticulation of horny fibres cored
by smooth cylindrical spicules—either monactinal or
quasi-diactinal—and echinated by smooth conoidal styli.
The former spicules represent the auxiliary, the latter the
principal, megascleres of other Myxilline: no other kind
of megasclere is present. Microscleres are typically
absent.
The genus Echinochalina was introduced by Thiele for a
species which he regards as identical with Ophlitaspongia
australiensis, Ridley. In expressing the opinion that the
species should be removed from the genus to which Ridley
assigned it, Thiele says, ‘‘eher scheint sie mir sich an Echino-
dictyum anzuschliessen, da sie wie diese Gattung Zuge von
gleichendigen Nadeln enhalt, von denen ungleichendige
abstehen; wahrend aber bei Echinodictyum die gleichendigen
Spicula grosse Amphioxe sind, sind es hier schw. ache Amphi-
strongyle und die abstehenden Style sind hier glatt, bei Echino-
dictyum stachlig.’’? Topsent is also of the opinion that Echino-
chalina is related to Echinodictyum, for he says,! “‘I] ne se
distingue du genre Echinodictyum qu’en ce que les spicules
qui hérissent les fibres sont de styles lisses, les Echinochalina
étant, en somme, aux Echinodictyum ce que les Ophlitaspongia
sont aux Clathria. > Both writers, however, have disregarded
certain very important differences in the spiculation of the two
genera, which render it highly improbable that they are in any
way closely related: as an example of such a difference it may
be mentioned that, whereas in Ec hinodictyum there are typi-
caly three kinds of megascleres, there are in Echinochalina
only two.
Besides Echinochalina australiensis, Thiele includes in his
genus Echinoclathria glabra, Ridley and Dendy, and Thalas-
sodendron digttata, Lendenfeld ; Whitelegge has since added
a fourth species, Echinochalina reticulata, and two others are
described in the present paper. Of these E. glabra and E.
reticulata are of special interest, since both in their honeycomb-
like external structure and in the forms of their spicules they
bear so striking a resemblance to species of Echinoclathria
that their close relationship to the latter seems indisputable.
One can therefore assert with some confidence concerning
these two species that they differ from Echinoclathria only in
the fact that their fibres are cored, not by principal spicules,
re eae Zool. Exp., Notes et imaene 1904, p. xcili.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 289
but by auxiliary; and as the remaining species are very ana-
logous to E. glabra and E. reticulata in point of spiculation, it
is extremely probable that in their case also, the axial spicules
of the fibres are auxiliary. The supposed resemblance between
Echinochalina and Echinodictyum is therefore a fictitious one,
since in the latter genus it is unquestionably the principal
spicules which core the fibres.
ECHINOCHALINA RETICULATA, JVhitelegge.
(Pit scocs olicmersandpiess OO.)
Sponge of rounded massive form, consisting of a honey-
comb-like reticulation of very thin, almost membranous,
lamelle; the superficial lamelle, as a rule, present their
edges to the exterior. Superficial ‘‘cell-apertures’’
averaging about S mm. in diameter. Skeleton (of each
lamella) an irregular ‘“‘bi-dimensional’’ reticulation of
main and connecting fibres. Main fibres with a sparse
core of slender cylindrical (auxiliary) megascleres varying
in form from tornotely-pointed subtylostyli to amphistron-
gyla; connecting fibres vacant: all the fibres abundantly
echinated by principal styli, conical in shape except for a
slight sub-basal constriction. Auxiliary megascleres are
abundantly scattered between the fibres. Megascleres,
sizes of :—(i.) Principal styli, length 120 to 170 p, maxi-
mum diameter ro p; (ii.) auxiliary spicules, length 180 to
230 #, maximum diameter 4 jt. Microscleres absent.
An examination of the single specimen (the type-specimen,
preserved in a dry state) which I have seen of this species,
provides nothing of importance that might be added to the
original description, except as regards the auxiliary megas-
cleres. These—which are cylindrical, more or less basally
expanded (i.e., subtylote), monactinal spicules—are usually
tornotely pointed ; but in a small proportion of them—between
which and the preceding are many individuals of intermediate
character—the distal extremity is rounded off like the end of
a strongyle. I am unable to support Whitelegge in his
statement that these strongylotely-ended spicules, which he
erroneously terms tylota, occur chiefly in the dermal layer;
rather does it appear to me that they are intermingled with
the others promiscuously.
In agreement with the thin membranous character of the
lamelle, the reticulation of fibres which forms the supporting
skeleton of any given lamella extends only in two dimensions
or, in other words, all the fibres composing it are parallel to
the plane of the lamella.
As the original figure does not convey a sufficiently clear
idea of the appearance of the sponge, a further figure on a
290 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
y \
WAVY
Fig. 66—E£. reticulata. a
Principal styles. b Auxiliary
spicules. b/ Showing vari-
ations of the distal extremity
of same.
larger scale is included herein; this
will the better enable one to per-
ceive the difference in aspect be-
tween the typical form of the species
and that described hereunder which
for the present I regard as a
variety.
Echinochalina reticulata var. (PI.
SKI Le Nt)
This variety, represented in the
collection by five specimens of
various irregularly massive form
and comparatively large size—the
largest specimen measuring 150
mm. in height, 230 mm. in length,
and 180 mm. in breadth—is of
much more compact structure than
the typical variety, and has spicules
of smaller size; the lamelle, also,
appear to be much less regularly
interwoven than in the latter.
The meshes enclosed by the
reticulating lamelle average 4 mm.
in width, which is only about one-
half that of the meshes (of) the
typical variety. The principal styli
range from 80 to 130 # in length,
and attain to 8 pw in diameter; the
auxiliary spicules are 160 to 200 y
in length, and in diameter not more
than 3.5 }!
Locs.—-South-east coast of Australia; east coast of Flinders
Island; off Devonport (‘‘Endeavour’’).
ECHINOCHALINA GLABRA, Ridley and Dendy.
(Rig. 67-)
1887. Echinoclathria glabra, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger’”’
Monaxonida, 1887, p. 163, pl. xxix., figs. 11, 11a;
ply sexi. eer 2s
#1896. Echinoclathria glabra, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc. Wact.,
viii. (n.s.), 1896,
p- 40.
[Not Echinochalina glabra, Whitelegge, Austr. Mus.
Mem., iv., pt. x,
1907, p- 504. |
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 291
Sponge of rounded massive form, consisting of a honey-
comb-like reticulation of thin lamelle@ ; lamell@ interwoven
in a somewhat irregular manner, and at the surface in-
differently disposed. ‘‘Cell-apertures,’? 3 to 5 mm. in
diameter. Skeleton (of each
lamella) an irregular ‘‘bi-
dimensional’’ reticulation of
main and connecting fibres.
Main fibres with a sparse core
of (auxiliary) subtylostrongyla ;
connecting fibres vacant: all
the fibres rather plentifully
echinated by (principal) styli.
Auxiliary megascleres are
rather abundantly scattered be-
tween the fibres. Megascleres:
—(i.) Principal styli, sub-con-
ical, slightly fusiform, gen- a a b
erally with a well-marked sub-
basal constriction, varying in
length from about 7o to Tro yt
or slightly less, and attaining a
maximum diameter of 6 or 7 #;
(i7.) auxiliary subtylostrongyla
or (occasionally) amphistron-
gyla varying in maximum
length in different specimens
from 200 to 220 yt.
Several specimens which I identify
as E. glabra, agree in all essential
respects with Ridley and Dendy’s
description save that the auxiliary
megascleres are not tylota, but sub- |
tylostrongyla and simple strongyla,
the number of the latter being re- J
latively very small. In this connec-
tion, however, the original descrip- _, Fig. 67—Z. glabra. a Prin-
tion is almost undoubtedly wrong, ees ae, peeextlia sy
since the spicule, as represented in i.
Ridley and Dendy’s figure, shows
an enlargement only at one extremity, the other being simply
rounded off like that of a strongyle.
In the two specimens which I have examined, and in a
mounted section! presented to the Australian Museum by
Prof. Dendy, the spicules apt: in size; the auxiliary vary in
1 This section is not, as Whitelegge ee cit.) supposed, a portion of the
type-specimen, but was cut from a specimen obtained in Port Phillip.
292 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
length from 160 to (rarely) 205 », and attain a maximum dia-
meter (rarely) of 4, whilst the principal vary in length from
75 to 110}, and reach a diameter of 7. In the ‘‘Challenger”’
specimen the maximum dimensions of the spicules were
220 X 3.2 and I10 x 6.3 p, respectively.
The specimens which Whitelegge, in his report on the
sponges of the ‘‘Thetis’’ Expedition, recorded as E. glabra,
prove to belong to a new species described below as R.
anomala.
-Locs.—Oft Moncceur Island, Bass Strait, 38 fms. (‘‘Chal-
lenger’’); Port Phillip (Dendy); forty miles west of Kingston,
South Australia, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’).
ECHINOCHALINA ANOMALA, Sp. nov.
(Fig. 68.)
1907. Echinochalina glabra (err., non Ridley and Dendy),
Whitelegge, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 10, 1907, p. 507.
External form massive, rounded. Sponge (in the dry
macerated condition) somewhat of honeycomb-like struc-
ture, being formed of very thin membranous lamelle
which tympanize the (on an average 3 mm. wide) meshes
of an irregular reticulation of stout (up to 250 u in dia-
meter) spiculo-spongin fibre; the lamelle are themselves
crossed only by a few (interreticulating) fibres of lesser
stoutness. All the fibres are provided with a stout com-
pact axial strand of (auxiliary) monactinally tapered am-
phistrongyla and (or) tornostyles, and are echinated—
fairly abundantly in the case of the stouter fibres—by sub-
conical (principal) styli, which, as a rule, are disposed
more or less perpendicularly to them. Abundant auxiliary
spicules are scattered interstitially, together with a few
principal spicules. Megascleres, sizes of :—(i.) Principal,
160 to 200 4 in length, 9 to 10 ¢ in maximum diameter ;
(ii.) auxiliary, t80 to 240 p in length, and about 5 4 in
maximum diameter. Microscleres absent.
Having had the opportunity of examining undoubted ex-
amples of Echinochalina glabra, I am able to say that the five
specimens recorded and briefly described as such by White-
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 293
legge, belong to another and new species, for which, on
account of its structural peculiarity, I propose the name
anomala. The fact that the species was mistaken for EF.
glabra, is sufficient indication of its ex-
ternal resemblance to species of Echino-
clathria. Its structure, however, differs
from that of Echinoclathria (and of Echino-
chalina glabra) in two readily noticeable
respects: firstly—along the lines of junc-
tion of the reticulating lamelle there runs
(or, to put it in other words, along each of
their joined edges the lamella are bounded
by) a very stout strand of spicules thinly
ensheathed by spongin ; and, secondly—the
lamella themselves, which are of membran-
ous thinness, are destitute of any support-
ing reticulation of main and connecting
fibres such as is found in the lamella of 4
Echinoclathria, but are traversed merely by
a very few irregularly interreticulating
fibres similar, except in point of stoutness,
to those which bound them. Consequently,
in the case of dry macerated (and some-
what damaged) specimens such as the
present are, the sponge appears as a loose
irregular reticulation of stout fibres with
meshes (which average about 3 mm. in
width) tympanized by thin membrane. In
their present condition, indeed, the speci-
mens might easily pass for washed-out
examples of some loosely reticulately-
fibred solid (i.e., not trabecular) sponge—-
such, for example, as many species of Big 6s Bene:
Mycale—with extraordinarily well-de- chalina anomala. a
veloped ‘‘interstitial membranes.”’ Principal style. b
strongylote aux ili-
ary spicules.
or
Measurement of the spicules in all five
specimens gave approximately identical
values, the auxiliary spicules attaining a
maximum size of 240 x 5 p, and the principal, 200 x 9g p
(not 160 x 8 yz as stated by Whitelegge).
Vhe auxiliary spicules are not quite cylindrical, but gradu-
ally taper from base to apex. At their apical extremity, they
294 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
«<
are either tornotely pointed (tornostyles) or strongylotely
rounded off (amphistrongyles); and, in this connection, it is
rather remarkable that whereas in four of the specimens these
spicules are almost exclusively amphistrongyles, in the fifth
they are almost exclusively tornostyles. The name ‘‘tylota’’
used by Whitelegge in reference to the auxiliary spicules is
quite inapplicable, since in no instance do they show any indi-
cation of a terminal enlargement, except occasionally at the
basal extremity; the distal extremity of the tornostyles is
variously modified in the same way as in FE. reticulata
(Fig. 66).
All the specimens are attached, as Whitelegge mentions, to
the branches of gorgonaceans, hydrocorallines, or bryozoans,
and also grow over and around these branches so as to en-
close them. ‘The sponge is without definite shape, but always
assumes a more or less rounded contour. The largest speci-
men, which happens to be of compressed form, measures
110mm. in height, 75mm. in breadth, and 25 mm. in thick-
ness.
Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, off Wollongong, 55-56
fmsemecLihetis”));
ECHINOCHALINA INTERMEDIA, Whitelegge.
(Fig. 69).
1go1. Thalassodendron viminalis (err., non Lendenfeld, 1888),
Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 87.
1902. Echinoclathria intermedia, Whitelegge, Op. cit., iv., 5,
1902, p. 214.
Sponge sessile, of clathrate structure and erect massive
form; composed of reticulating, erect and_ transverse,
flattened trabecule of various size, 5 to 30 mm. long, 4
to 20 mm. wide, and 2 to 4 mm. thick. Skeleton an
irregular reticulation of fibres which are comparatively
poor in spongin and are mostly provided with a stout,
often fairly dense, multispicular axial strand of (auxiliary)
cylindrical tornostyles and (scarce) amphistrongyles; the
connecting fibres sometimes contain few or no spicules.
The fibres are echinated, at all angles of inclination, by
comparatively few conical smooth (principal) styli, Aux-
iliary spicules are scattered interstitially in moderate
abundance, together with a few principal spicules. Mega-
scleres, sizes of :—(i.) Principal, 80 to 150 p in length,
g # in maximum diameter; (ii.) auxiliary, 140 to 185 win
length, 4 in maximum diameter. Microscleres absent.
SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 295
The only available example of this
species is that which Whitelegge has
described. It is an incomplete dry
specimen in a very imperfect state of
preservation, and, as such, accords
fairly well with Whitelegge’s descrip-
tion except in regard to spiculation. I
am unable, however, to confirm the
statement that numerous small oscula
are present, and regard the term
‘‘honeycomb-like,’’ used to describe the
external structure of the sponge, as
misleading, since it tends to call to mind ‘ :
the cellular structure characteristic of
Echinoclathria. In its present condi-
tion the specimen shows no semblance
of a dermal membrane, nor of any
specialised dermal layer.
The original account of the spicular
characters, which is quite misleading,
must have been based upon some por-
tion of the specimen in which there were Fig. 69 — Echino-
fibres of another sponge. chalina intermedia.
a Principal style. b
The locality of the specimen is un- Auxiliary torno-
age strongyle.
GENUS CLATHRIODENDRON, Lendenfeld.
1888. Clathriodendron, Lendenfeld, Descr. Cat. Sponges
Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 215.
The three species for the reception of which Lendenfeld
founded this genus, led him to propose for it the following
definition :—‘‘Desmacidonide with exceedingly large tylo-
stylote megasclera scattered in the ground substance. The
spongin-fibres of the supporting skeleton contain only a few
spicules. Echinating spicules spined styli.’’ In the descrip-
tion of the species we learn further that the arrangement of the
fibres is reticular, and that microscleres are absent. The
character of the spicules suggests that Clathriodendron may
be related to Raspailia, and, indeed, in his recently described
R. pavadoxa, a somewhat aberrant species of the latter,
Hentschel! has found reasonable grounds for supposing the
two genera to be identical. It transpires, however, that C.
arbuscula (the first-described of the three species, and, there-
fore, best entitled to rank as the genotype) whilst exhibiting
1 Hentschel—Die Fauna Stidwest-Australiens, Tetraxonida, ii., 1911, p. 383.
296 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
points of resemblance to certain species of Raspailia, possesses
characters sufficiently distinctive to justify the retention of
Clathriodendron as an independent genus. As regards the
two remaining species, I can offer no positive opinion, since in
the existing collection of the Australian Museum no specimen
occurs which satisfies the description of either; but, accepting
Lendenfeld’s statement that C. irregularis is similar, both in
‘skeleton and spiculations,’’ to C. arbuscula, this one of them
we may reckon provisionally as likewise belonging to Clathrio-
dendron. As for the other, C. nigra,! there is reason to sus-
pect that its description is inaccurate, and that its proper place
is in the genus Raspailia.
I have examined well-preserved spirit-specimens? of C.
arbuscula, and find that the surface of the sponge is perfectly
1 Included amongst the small pieces of British Museum sponges which
Prof. Dendy has placed at the disposal of the Australian Museum, is one
labelled Clathriodendron nigra, Lendenfeld. It is a small portion of a
slender branch, quite black in colour, and in external attributes, accord-
ingly harmonises with the species whose name it carries; moreover, its
identification as such is understood to be due to Lendenfeld himself. One
is quite at a loss, therefore, on finding that its spicular characters are
not in accordance with requirements, to decide whether the specimen is
wrongly named or the species wrongly described. In the description of
C. nigra, the only spicules mentioned are the tylostyli, “.7 mm. long and
.017 mm. thick,’’ and the “comparatively very scarce” acanthostyli, ‘.1
mm. long and .01 mm. thick, with very small spines.” In this reputed
example of the species, I note, as regards the spicules, the following
particulars :—The tylostyli attain a maximum size of 2000 x 25 j1, and the
acanthostyli, which are fairly abundant and are provided with moderate-
sized spines, have a range in length from 75 to 130 », with a maximum
stoutness of 12 yp. Large tylostyli project singly beyond the surface of
the sponge and are surrounded at their point of emergence each by a
divergent tuft of slightly fusiform styli which vary in length from about
300 to 380 » and attain a maximum stoutness of 9 ; but are seldom of
greater size than 345 x 4.5 ji. Finally, slender asymmetrical oxea, 200 to
380 ». in length and at most 4.5 j1 in diameter, are sparsely scattered in
the ground substance. Owing to the dry, much-shrunken condition of
the fragment, I am unable to determine what was the pattern of the
skelton; but it appears to have been reticular and devoid of any well-
marked ‘‘axial condensation,’’ resembling in these respects that of
Clathriodendron and of Raspailia paradoxa, Hentschel.
2 Although I consider it beyond doubt that these specimens are genuine
examples (if not the actual type-specimens) of C. arbuscula. 1 think it only
right to mention—inasmuch as I have to remark the incorrectness, in
some particulars, of Lendenfeld’s description of the species—that the
documentary proof of their identity is not complete. The specimens are
labelled (in Lendenfeld’s handwriting) only with the manuscript name,
“ Geraospina arbuscula,’ and a reference number; and I find, on consult-
ing the key-list of Lendenfeld’s manuscript names (vide Whitelegge, Rec.
Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 64), that. for this particular name (and num-
ber), no synonym is given.
I might here mention that the name “ Ceraospina arbuscula”? also occurs
under number 307 of the key-list, and in this instance is stated to be a
synonym of Echinonema anchoratum var. ramosa, Lendenfeld. This in-
formation, however, is wrong, and has led to an error on the part of
Whitelegge; for the only specimen in the Australian Museum labelled
“Ceraospina arbuscula, No. 307’—that which Whitelegge (Rec. Austr.
Mus., iv., ii., 1901, p. 81) has erroneously (and, I must add, not quite
correctly) described under the name of Hechinonema anchoratum_ var.
ramosa—proves to be, in point of spiculation, skeleton pattern and sur-
face conulation, the counterpart of Clathriodendron arbuscula, It differs
to some extent from the other specimens of this species, however, in
habit and texture, and so may be another species; but since it is of
small size and is preserved in a dry state, the probability is that these
differences are due merely to differences of age and state of preservation.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 207
glabrous, there being an entire absence of the dermal brushes
of spicules so characteristic of Raspailia, and, indeed, an
absence of any dermally situated spicules whatsoever. The
skeleton is a well-defined, moderately small-meshed, reticula-
tion of horny fibres, and is without any trace of an ‘‘axial
condensation.’’ The main or longitudinal fibres, which lie
rather widely apart, are sparsely cored with long tylostyles,
whilst the connecting fibres are without axial spicules; both
main and connecting fibres are fairly plentifully echinated by
acanthostyles. Tylostyli, exceeding in number those within
the fibres, occur also interstitially, disposed in approximate
parallelism with the main fibres; and further, there are scat-
tered between the fibres, though somewhat rare in their occur-
rence, slender asymmetrical oxea (auxiliary spicules) which lie
either singly or in contiguous parallel pairs. The tylostyli,
which are usually more or less curved, are rarely less than
500 # long, and may reach a length of 1 mm.; the stoutest of
them have a diameter of 16 to 20 pw. The largest acantho-
styles measure about 110 x 8 yw; and the oxea, which are
commonly between 270 and 320 yp in length and rarely more
than 4.5 # in diameter, attain a maximum size of 410 x 5.5 #.
In external features the specimens are in close accord with
the original description. Lendenfeld’s statement, however,
that the “‘sponge has the shape of a tree,’’ is rather vague,
and perhaps does not convey a correct idea of its habit of
growth. The actual appearance of the sponge is exceedingly
like that of the specimen which Lendenfeld! has figured as
Clathrissa arbuscula, but which, as I have already ventured
to assert, does really represent an example of the present
species.
Having examined a slide of Carter’s Dictyocylindrus cac-
ticutis,2 presented to the Australian Museum by Prof. Dendy,
I] am in a position to say that this is also a species of Clathrio-
dendron, and that it approaches fairly closely both in the size
and form of its spicules to C. arbuscula, with which it agrees
also in habit of growth and in having a conulose surface. The
maximum dimensions of the spicules prove to be as follows :—
Tylostyli, 975 x 16 #; acanthostyli, 120 x 10 pW; oxea, 320 x
3 4. The last-mentioned spicules appear to be extremely rare.
1 Lendenfeld—Loce. cit., pl. v., fig. 2.
2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 354; Dendy—Proc. Roy.
Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 48. Vide also, Dendy —Rept. Pearl Oyster
Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, etc., 1905, p. 176.
298 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
I1I.—APPENDIX.
Below is given a list of synonyms, as far as I have been
able to establish them, of the species of Ectyonine described
by Lendenfeld in his ‘‘Catalogue of the Sponges in the Aus-
tralian Museum’’ (pp. 214-227), and of the species wrongly
identified with (some of) these by Whitelegge. The names
are listed in the order in which they appear in the Catalogue,
Lendenfeld’s species being indicated by the letter ‘‘L,’’? White-
legge’s by the letter ‘“W;”’ along with the synonym of each
is a reference to the page herein on which the species is dealt
with. Species of which I have seen no specimens are marked
by an asterisk.
Myxilla.—
M. jacksoniana, L. Lissodendoryx jacksoniana, L.!
Clathriodendron.—
C. arbuscula, L. Clathriodendron arbuscula, L. 295).
(p.
*C. irregularis, L. ? Clathriodendron irregularis, L. (p. 296).
Cynisra,.L. ? Raspailia nigra, L. (p. 296).
Clathrissa.—
C. arbuscula, L. Clathrissa arbuscula, L. (p. 146).
*C. elegans, L. ? Clathrissa elegans, L. (p. 146).
C. pumila, L. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. pumila, L.
(p. 168).
C. pumila, var. rubra, L. CG. inerustans, Carter, var:
rubra, L. (p. 170).
Echinonema.—
*EH. anchoratum, var. ramosa, L. ? Wilsonella ramosa, L.
(p. 243).
*E. anchoratum, var. ramosa, W. Clathriodendron arbu-
scula, L. (p. 296).
? Wilsonella dura, L., non
Whitlg. (p. 243).
1 An examination of the type-specimen of Myzxilla jacksoniana has
shown that the chele are of the arcuate type, and that the species,
therefore, belongs to Lissodendorya.
SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 299
FE. anchoratum, var. dura, W. Clathria (?) indurata,
sp. nov.2
*E. anchoratum, var. lamellosa, L. ? Wailsonella lamellosa,
L. (p. 243).
E. anchoratum, var. lamellosa, W. Clathria spicata, sp.
nov. (p. 210).
E. levis, L. (and W.) Crella incrustans, Carter, var.
levis, eo. (pen16a)).
E. rubra, L. (and W.) Crella incrustans, Carter, var.
levis, L. (p. 164).
Clathria.—
*C. macropora, L. ? Wilsonella macropora, L. (p. 240).
C. macropora, W. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. arenaced,
Garter (p. vom):
C. pyramida, L. Wilsonella pyramida, L. (p. 240).
“Os australise le ? Wilsonella australis, L. (p. 239).
C. australis, W. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. arenacea,
Carter (p. 16%):
Thalassodendron.—
ol avotiata, le. ? Echinochalina digitata, L. (p. 288).
he typica. LL. ? Wilsonella typica, L. (p. 203)
T. typica, W. Echinodictyum elegans, L. (p. 203).
T. rubens, var. dura, L. Clathria rubens, L. (p. 219).
1 For the sponge which Whitelegge (Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 81)
mistook for Lendenfeld’s Echinonema achoratum var. dura, I now pro-
pose the name Clathria indwrata. Whitelegge’s description is substan-
tially correct except in regard to the dimensions of the spicules. His
use of the term ‘“honeycomb-like,” in reference to the external conforma-
tion of the sponge, however, is inappropriate; and the statement that
“the texture is... minutely porous throughout” is correct only so far
as it applies to the surface, which is minutely porous over its entire
entent. As a matter of fact, the texture (of dry specimens) is particularly
dense and compact; and the consistency, in consequence, is unusually
firm and hard. The available specimens (three in number) are destitute
of any traces of a specialised dermal skeleton; but the information which
they afford in this particular is unreliable, since their preservation is
imperfect; and it is possible, therefore, that the species may prove to
belong to Rhaphidophlus. Indeed, it is to be noted that in certain of its
spicular characters, more particularly in regard to its auxiliary mega-
scleres, it exhibits points of resemblance to Rhaphidophlus_ typicus; but
toxa are absent, and the chele are of only a single kind. Thus, the
auxiliary spicules (subtylostyli) are pretty abundant; they exhibit a very
considerable range in length; the shortest of them—which are very
slender—are curved; and a fair proportion are provided, upon their extreme
basal end, with a minute spination; also, the acanthostyles, the spines of
which are moderately large, show a tendency towards a reduction of their
spination over the sub-basal portion of their length. The principal
spicules are without special features, being more or less curved, subconical
styli. The dimensions of the megascleres, taking into account their range
in length and maximum stoutness, are as follows:—Principal, 120 to 200
x 13 yp; accessory, 55 to 70 x 7.5 71; auxiliary, 95 to 220 x 5.5 »). The greatest
length of the chele is 12 7. The “‘ill-defined and hair-like spicules men-
tioned in Whitelegge’s description as being present in small number in
the ground substance, were no doubt some of the very slenderest of the
auxiliary spicules.
300 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
T. rubens, var. dura, W. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, L.
(p. 179).
T. rubens, var. lamella, L. (and W.) Rhaphidophlus pauci-
spinus, (pp. 179, 219).
T. paucispinus, L. (and W). Rhaphidophlus paucispinus
(p. 179):
T. brevispina, L. (and W.) Rh. typicus, Carter, var. brevi-
Spins, 12) (ps 292):
T. viminalis, L. (and W.) O phlitaspongia subhis pida,
Carter, var. viminalis, L. (p. 259).
Plectispa.—
*Pelegaus, L: ? Echinoclathria elegans, L. (p. 204)
P. elegans, W. Echinoclathria arborea, L. (p. 280).
Pearbored, ls. Echinoclathria arborea, L. (p. 280).
P. arborea, W. Clathria multipes, sp. nov. (p. 211).
“Peamacropora, LL. ? IVilsonella macropora (bis.), L.
(p: 205)
P. macropora, W. Echinoclathria ramosa, sp. nov.
(p. 278).
Clathriopsamma.—
C. lobosa, L. (and W.) Wilsonella australiensis, Carter,
(p. 239).
C. reticulata, L. Rhaphidophlus reticulatus, L. (p. 177).
* r" al 3
il a »d Woy
;
LJ
im ‘
=
i
j
=.
a
1 Z
y’ .
v
‘
Ps ‘
7 '
>
By,
;
.
' ‘
i
}
ma)
.
f * a
ic. Ll 7 .
i j * =)!
3 { i
a : :
to
o>)
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXI-
Spirastrella poculoides, sp. nov.; x 7/10.
The specimen, which has been longitudinally bi-
sected, is viewed from the inner surface.
Spirastrella alcyonioides, sp. nov.; X 3/5-
Spirastrella montiformis, sp. nov.; x 5/6.
The surface markings are traces left by an en-
crusting Cornulariid Alcyonarian.
X XI.
PLATE
‘ENDEAVOUR.”’
RESUETS
LOO
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
Fig.
bo
Ow
EXPLANATION OF PLATE OG:
Latrunculia conulosa, sp. nov. ; natural size.
Paracordyla lignea, gen. et sp. nov.; x 2/3.
The specimen, which has been longitudinally bi-
sected, is viewed from the inner surface.
Polymastia craticia, sp. nov. ; x 3/8.
LOOT RE SUMRS: = NDE AW OWIR: 7? PLATE XXII.
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
ie
bo
(oS)
EXPLANATION ‘OB (PLADE TXT
Echinodictyum elegans, Lendenfeld; x 1/3.
Crella incrustans, Carter, var. digitata, var. nov.,
encrusting a bivalve; viewed from the side; x 1/2.
Crella incrustans, var. arenacea, Carter; x 4/9.
Showing the irregularity of form assumed by the
shallow-water New South Wales representatives of
the species; the dermal encrustation is almost en-
tirely denuded ; the surface-grooves are less apparent
in the figure than in the specimen itself.
ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XXIII.
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIV.
A
Fig. 1. Crella incrustans, var. perramosa, var. nov. ; X 1/3.
PLATE XXIV.
“ENDEAVOUR.”
RESULTS
ZOOM:
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXV.
Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, Lendenfeld; x 1/2.
I
Fig. 2. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, Lendenfeld, var. multi-
porus, Whitelegge; x 2/7.
ZOOL] RESUS, “ENDEAVOUR.” REATE xoxaVe
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVI.
Fig. 1. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, Lendenfeld; x 1/3.
ZOOL. RESULES “ENDEAVOUR. ? PLATE XXVI.
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
” - ,
7 ‘ Ty _ Nips
vt a “
ei .
a
/
f ‘ 4
% +
(a s
’
+
’
'
‘
t
‘
®
'
: j '
‘
, 4 a
Ve !
bi
f *
,
‘ 2 “y
‘ =
i
d -
s
”
+
t
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVII.
Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var.
MOVa ss X99) 56
stellifer, var.
BATE XGxavill:
AVOUR.”’
SE NDE
SWIES
ZO Ose
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
as
i
\
More
j
re
be) hau ii 7 © _— sober wri
ss Sout ‘
* ras
i
ae
f
i ti
' si
“ ‘x
- 2
7) ud
oA
'
, i= tok
'
.
"
;
. se
4
¥
~
i
(
i
oi t es
|
is ra iv t
é
2 es ;
2 pea A re a We
to
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVIII
Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. obesus,
NOV. 5 x 5/8:
Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. geminus,
MOV 5 KTH 22
Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. proximus,
NOV. 563% H/2.
Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. proximus,
NOV. 5 X¢E/2:
Var.
Var-
Var-
Var.
ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XXVIII.
H. BARNES, JUNB., Photo.
ae Or ~y a
See ee) ee Ge,
me hs be ee i j
peur eae? ; ‘ i
:
.
$ D
= b
j i -
‘
.
J il 2
i
.
! .
‘ ‘ :
W \
’
A
i
z
{ t
D
7 |
A
iT oes .
Ny 7
te y
Lely Ga Ser attrias, ee ne = i cei, ae. te ian
7 i“ ah &-ge S Let : eines f ; a 5. Bs, :
iad : veut
\ P note M +
. 4 ; 4
' : ve : ;
> . S , Pa
_ z OPP cet. ee . t 7-2 ai i 19 . UY an
‘ : . a eo} &. §
, oy » tas, oh
~ oa c : ; f ; Wp ee esa J
wh ait PTC ea Tyee, > RUA iy eel eng enn Pe 7 ) : F - ‘ oa i 79 A! : :
i * ; ) MP A: |g
> 65 ¢ Pt 33 8 a - Ai
%
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIX.
Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. anchoratus,
Carter; x 3/3:
Fig. 1.
Echinoclathria arborea, Lendenfeld; x 1/2.
LS)
Fig.
LOOLS (RESULELS JE NDEAV OUR PLATE XXIX.
. st ia a
= a Sorel as bee Tes > A
Ol
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
j Was me coli J <
4 y a” py oath
ia er 44)
tute
e¢ <8 7 oy -s
a - (
d ‘ ¢ -
7 ee -
i -
~*
z
~
- res
s
e
=
.
.
=<)
j
(
f ‘
a ‘
ar
'
fs ‘ 7 j
. - e
+
€ ‘
U
" ‘
i " ,
o
>
i=
¢
iy ‘
4
~
Se reas
"
TPise ees |
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXX.
Bigs
‘ ‘
, -
‘
; S
-
’
j
a f
i
\
: 1
*
4 -
j
a
A
id 4 i
= a
ms
; a . ,; : i
oe on i en a
ry 7
& W Nb
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXIII.
Clathria transiens, sp. nov., typical form; x 2/3.
Clathria transiens, form (b); x 3/5.
Clathria transiens, form (c); x 3/5.
Clathria caelata, sp. nov.; x 2/3.
XXXII.
PLATE
“ENDEAVOUR.”’
ZOOL. RESULTS
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
eel
==)
=
Vo
ico)
go dQ oq
Poles)
=
EXPLANATION’ OF--PEATE XOXXciy-
Ophlitaspongia subhispida, Carter, var. viminalis,
Lendenfeld; x 1/2.
Clathria transiens, form (d); x 3/4.
Wilsonella oxyphila, sp. nov.; ? var.; x 1/2.
Wilsonella-curvichela, sp. nov. ; x 5/13.
ZOOL RESUELS “ENDEAVOUR? PLATE XXXI\
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXV.
Ophlitaspongia tenuis, Carter; x 3/5.
Ophlitaspongia confragosa, sp. nov.; x 2/3.
Ophlitaspongia tubulosa, sp. nov. ; x 3/5.
ZOOL RESUERS “ENDEAVOUR: PLATE XXXV.
¥
2
et
-
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
xe
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
to
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVI.
Ophlitaspongia subhispida, Carter; x 9/10.
Ophlitaspongia inornata, sp. nov. ; x 8/9.
The specimen is encrusted with a Cornulariid
Alcyonarian.
Ophlitaspongia axinelloides, Dendy; x 7/9.
ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.”’ PLATE XXXVI.
H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo.
IV. A new species of Asymmetron from the Great
Australian Bight, South Australia.
JANET W. RAFF, B.Sc.,
GOVERNMENT RESEARCH SCHOLAR,
Biological Laboratory, Melbourne University.
Plate XXXVII.
A NEW SPECIES OF ASYMMETRON.
].—INTRODUCTION.
The Commonwealth F.1I.S. ‘‘Endeavour,’’ whilst conducting
its operations along the southern coast of Australia, secured
specimens of the well-known Asymmetron bassanum, and also
of another species of the same genus which, on examination,
proves to be a new one. The Department of Trade and Cus-
toms, to whom the material secured by the ‘‘Endeavour’’
belongs placed these specimens in the hands of Professor W.
Baldwin Spencer for identification and description, and at his
request I have undertaken the work.
Asymmetron bassanum is not uncommonly met with at
depths of about twenty fathoms off the Victorian coast in Bass
Strait and in Western Port in four fathoms. Specimens were
secured by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ on the east side of Flinders
Island, to the south of St. Francis Island in the Australian
Bight, and also off Shoalhaven on the New South Wales
coast. It has not hitherto been met with to the west of Bass
Strait.
The new species was dredged at a depth of thirty-five
fathoms on the south side of St. Francis Island in the Aus-
tralian Bight in company with 4. bassanum, from which it,
however, is quite distinct. In the following account a des-
cription is given of its more important features.
1].—DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIES.
ASYMMETRON AUSTRALIS, sp. now.
(Plate xxxvu., figs. 1-7.)
The average length of twelve specimens is 26 mm.; the
average number of myotomes, 55; the average myotome
formulat + 38,.9, 13.
The rostral fin is slightly raised above the dorsal fin, and is
rounded anteriorly. The anterior end of the notochord is
inclined a little upwards in the rostral fin (Pl. xxxvii., fig. 1).
There are 25-33 oral cirri bearing sense papilla, arranged
in a single series and united together by a web. They are
disposed at about equal intervals to the right and left of a
median ventral one, as shown in PI. xxxvii., figs. 3, 4 and 5.
The web is continuous all along, and is highest in the mid-
ventral portion, becoming lower anteriorly on each side. In
Pl. xxxvii., fig. 6, there is a small basal portion only, in the
mid line, but this, I think, must be the result either of injury
or arrest of growth, for new tentacles do not develop in between
304 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
other tentacles. As regards this point, Willey! writes :—‘‘It
is important to note that the buccal skeleton grows at each
end only, and that fresh elements are not for med interstitially.
In the adult the median cirri are smaller than the others; and
one would at first naturally suppose that these were the
youngest, and that this was the point at which fresh cirri
would be formed; as a matter of fact, however, the small size
of the median ventral cirri of the adult is deceptive, for they
are the oldest cirri, and new ones are only added at the free
extremities, right and left, of the buccal skeleton.’’ Therefore
I think the hoods with the tentacles arranged as in Pl. xxxvii.,
figs. 6 and 7, are also of the ordinary type, having a median
unpaired tentacle.
The oval sphincter is situated in a line with the angle of the
sixth myotome, and has about fifteen velar tentacles.
The ventral fin has chambers and fin rays. I have not been
able to determine whether the rays are single or double.
The dorsal fin is about one-thirteenth the vertical height of
the body, and the fin rays stop behind about the 49th mvotome.
The vight metapleur is continuous behind with the median
ventral fin, the left stops immediately behind the atriopore.
There are two post-atrioporal ceca, the right continuing
much further back than the left and reaching almost to the
anus.
The gonads are arranged ina es series on the right side
and vary in number from 17-22. An important point noted
is the presence of the gastrula stz age of the egg. In examining
the specimens I found several of the ova in this stage, but
they are not preserved well enough for a good microscopical
examination.
The above characters would place the species in the same
subdivision of the genus Asymmetron as that in which we pre-
viously placed A. bassanum.?
In length, number of myotomes and myotome formula, and
the number of oral cirri, Asymmetron australis agrees very
closely with Heteropleuron hedleyi, found in Torres Strait,
and described by Professor W. A. Haswell.5 The rostral fin,
however, differs in being raised above the level of the dorsal
fin and in being more expanded; the dorsal fin rays extend
further back, and ventral fin rays are present. In the descrip-
tion of H. hedleyi there is no mention of the post-atrioporal
region of the atrial cavity, nor of the oral hood excepting the
number of oral cirri.
1 Willey—Quart. Jour. Micro. Sci., xa 1891, p. 914,
2 Morris & Raff—Notes on the Structure of Asymmetron bassanwn—Proc..
Roy. Soc. Vict., xxii. (n.s.), Pt. I., 1909, p. 88
3 Haswell—Rec. Austr. Mus., vii., 1, 1908, p. 33, fig. 1.
ASYMMETRON.—RAFF. 305
Enumerating the species previously found in the Austral-
asian seas, it will be seen that hitherto only one has been found
along the south coast of Australia, viz., 4. bassanum. The
following is a list of the Australasian species and their distribu-
tion, as set out by Mr. W. M. Tattersall, B.Sc.,1 with the
addition of Professor Haswell’s new species :—
Branchiostoma belcheri, Gray.—
Borneo, Singapore, Torres Strait, Maldive Islands and
Ceylon.
Asymmetron bassanum, Giunther.—
Bass Strait, and as far north as Port Jackson.
A. hectori, Benham.—
East oe of North Island of New Zealand.
A. cultellum, Peters.—
Torres Strait, north-east coast of Australia, Thursday
Island and Ceylon.
A. lucayanum, Andrews.—
Bahamas, Louisiade Archipelago, Maldive Islands,
Zanzibar and Vorres Strait (Haswell).
Heteropleuron hedleyi, Haswell.—
Torres Strait.
As the species described differs entirely from A. bassanum,
the only other species from the southern coast, it may be worth
while to here note the difference in general external appearance
between the two (PI. xxxvii., fig. 2). Roughly speaking, we
can say that in A. bassanum ‘the widest portion of the body is
at about its middle third, and from here it tapers gradually
towards both ends. In A. australis, however, it appears
widest at about the second quarter from its anterior end, and
tapers gradually from here towards the posterior end and only
very little towards the anterior end. Thus the anterior half of
the animal is much wider than the posterior, whereas in 4A.
bassanum the anterior and posterior halves are fairly equal.
This seems to be a most striking difference between the two
species. In addition, the smaller size of this species, and also
the absence of the incomplete ring of pigment always found in
A. bassanum, may be noted as further differences seen easily
with the naked eye.
In comparing the oral hoods of the two species, an im-
portant difference is seen between them. As was noted above,
the most median ventral oral cirrus in A. australis is unpaired.
In A. bassanum the arrangement of the mid-ventral portion
1 Tattersall—Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., xvii., p. 293.
206 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
varies very much in the different specimens examined, for here
there may be either a median pair of tentacles or a median
unpaired one. I have to thank Miss Ethel Summons, Mel-
bourne University, for first drawing my attention to the paired
arrangement. In Pl. xxxvil, figs. 8 to 15, I have represented
the bases of the oral cartilages. in the mid-ventral portion of
the hood of eight different specimens, and it will be seen by
them that there is a great amount of variation here. Pi
xxxvil., figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 show no median unpaired ten-
tacle, but a distinct median pair, while in Pl. xxxvil., figs. 13,
14, 15 there is a median unpaired one. In Pl. xxxvil., fig. 16,
the margin of the oral hood with the cirri cartilages 1s repre-
sented, and it will be seen that the basal portions of the
cartilages of the median pair are smaller than the others and
are inclined at a different angle to the margin of the hood, and
so are clearly distinguishable. The two ventral cirri repre-
sented in Pl. xxxvii., fig. 12, are not so clearly paired as in
the others
In referring to the literature on the subject I can find no-
thing very definite. In 1895, Miss J. W. Kirkaldy,! giving
the characteristic features of the Family Branchiostomide,
says:—'‘A preoral muscular hood is developed in front of the
mouth, provided along its circular margin with numerous
tentacles, supported by a cartilaginoid skeleton; there is one
median unpaired tentacle in the median ventral line, and from
ten to twenty (according to age and species) on either side.”’
In 1876, Peters? described Epigonichthys cultellum as
having ten to twelve pairs of oral cirri, and figuring the under
Surface of the anterior end draws the cirri showing clearly that
there is no median cirrus, but he does not state definitely the
presence of a median ventral pair. Miss Kirkaldy, however,
in her paper, describes this species as having forty-one to
forty-three oral cirri, thus giving it a median tentacle.
Then, again, Mr. J. D. F. Gilchrist® gives the number of
oral cirri in Branchiostoma capense as thirty- =Sixiiuiealleneelite
as is generally taken to be the case, the cirri are paired on the
two pide of the hood (with the exception of the median ven-
tral one), i.e., if the number of cirri is the same on the two
sides, this would not allow of a median cirrus being present
in this species. It is thus evident there is some uncertainty as
to the exact arrangement of the cirri and that a structure
previously described as characteristic of the Family Branch-
iostomide is actually subject to variation within the limits of
a single species.
1 i W. anid ouart rou Micro. Sci., xxxvii. (n.s.), 1895, p. 309.
2 Peters—Monat. K. Preuss. Akad., 1870.
3 Gilehrist—Marine Investigation in South Africa, ii., 1904, p. 111.
4 .
: ‘
; A
v
1
Br
¥
- ec,
“4 f a ;
7 8 A
it
Mi '
i .
¥ '
'
'
i
j as
bi 4
F 7 4 . ii
t 4 J ~~
'
= i
‘ '
rt . ‘alas , i
4 (A .
a] c
hi / %,
o ; ‘
i ‘ ji i fi
| sj ‘ aie, | a hy ae
= } bd t
i i
, & yi ‘
{ 1 ne. u 7 : =
oS ey : ‘
r ‘ »
i
ph }
a oie 1S i ”
¥ nh
@ "es hk
- . i h ;
¥ , ;
r
4 /
BD:
i ye
iar ‘ ’
fe: bo
on Ai. aan -.
peer 3.0 a os ‘a
EXPLANATION ‘OF PEATE XXXVI:
In all figures—
AX. CART. ~~ — Axial cartilage
B. (CART. = Basal cartilage.
Ba ee = Dorsal fin chambers.
D.F-.R. = Dorsal fin rays.
M.P. CART. = Median paired cartilages.
N.C. = Nerve cord.
N.T. = Notochord.
R.F. = | Rostral fin:
Fig. 1.—Anterior end of A. australis showing rostral fin and
notochord slightly raised. Drawn with the camera
lucida.
Fig. 2.—-Outlines of A. bassanum and A. australis to show
proportional widths. Drawn with the camera
Ineida. )Nat,isizes:
Figs. 3, 4 and 5.—Bases of the cartilages of the mid-ventral
portion of the oral hood in three different specimens
of 4. australis to show median ventral unpaired
tentacle.
Figs. 6 and 7.—The same in two other specimens with the
median ventral unpaired tentacle stunted.
Figs. 8 to 12.—Bases of the cartilages of the mid-ventral
portion of the oral hood in five different specimens
of 4. bassanum to show median paired tentacles.
Figs. 13, 14 and 15.—Bases of the cartilages of the mid-
ventral portion of the oral hood in three other speci-
mens of 4d. bassanum showing median unpaired
tentacle.
Fig. 16.—Cartilages of oral cirri of 4. bassanum showing
position of the median ventral pair.
(ENON EU |S) BN UC Ee rd LM eV LOH noes | ENA DOO. OVAL
ie
} scm $V |
By B CART. 4 /
SS
M. P. CART SQ)
J. W. RAFF, del
16 15
=_ r > =:
= -
: : - ; ht es A. ae
ca, | +
H er
alll
b=
»
aa *
t = I
.
{
V. Report on a sample of G/obigertna Ooze trom
fathoms, East of T‘asmania.
BY
F. CHAPMAN, A.LS.
PALHONTOLOGIST TO THK NATIONAL MUSEUM,
Melbourne.
Li22
- i
< Me a f
:
\
Ps
a]
4
*
j ‘
)
N
|
ad
U
ey
‘
*
_ i q } ' > ;
] » ‘ ' "i i 3 " :
- ap ( ’ _ of
ci ve
a) ek ’
5 So! ao! « ~ i TRG Ax) Gy sy 7 a
GLOBIGERINA OOZE.—CHAPMAN. 2
V.—REPORT ON SAMPLE OF GLOBIGERINA OOZE.
Date, 13th July, 1909. Position, 42:17) S:,, P46.51 (E-
Depth, 1122 fathoms (bottom sample).
Details.—Globigerina Ooze. Colour, pale green, with a
slight greenish tinge.
CARBONATE OF LIME.
PER- . San ~ : r
CENTAGE. FORAMINIFERA, OTHER ORGANISMS,
79 Chiefly Globigeringe and Kchinoid spines, rare;
Pulvinuline. Tue Yextu- | Ostracodes, rare (for
larids present are chiefly | species see list); Alcyon-
hyaline forms. arian spicules, frequent ;
(For species see list). | Coccoliths, abundant.
|
Sse
RESIDUE.
boucace. | SILICIOUS ORGANISMS. | FINE WASHINGS.
| 7 ery a |
21 | Sponge-spicules, abun- | Fine mineral particles,
dant; Radiolarians, rare; of a greenish colour.
Arenaceous Foraminifera,
moderately common, as
_ Haplophragmium, Reo-
| phax, Technitella.
| |
NOTE ON THE SAMPLE.
This is a fairly typical Globigerina ooze, with a large per-
centage of residue insoluble in HCl, owing to the abundance
of silicious sponge-remains. This occurrence of sponge-
spicules would naturally lead one to conclude that some of the
arenaceous foraminifera which form their tests of these
silicious needles would be present, and in this we are not
disappointed. Both Technitella and Marsipella occur here,
and the locality is new for both genera. Technitella legumen
was previously recorded off Sydney and near Kerguelen Island.
T. raphanus is an exceedingly rare form, having been hitherto
obtained from only one locality, viz., off Kandavu, Fiji
210 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
Islands. The nearest locality to that from which the present
sounding was taken hitherto recorded for Marsipella cylin-
drica, curiously enough, is also Kandavu. The family Milio-
lide is represented by the deep-water variety of Biloculina
depressa and a few minute forms of Miliolina. Yhe family
Textulariida is much in evidence, chiefly represented by
the genera Bulimina and Bolivina. Some starved forms of
Nodosaria and some typical Uvigerine are the only members
of the Lagéenide. Globigerina is well represented and com-
petes closely in numbers with Pulvinulina. A few other rota-
line genera beside the last-named are found, some of very
great interest. The foraminiferal fauna of this sample is
fairly rich in species, and contains some apparently new
varieties, and will repay an exhaustive research.
The Ostracoda are not common, but are, nevertheless, of
especial importance. Writhe producta and Cytheropteron
abyssorum are both deep-water forms; the latter being a very
rare species, and recorded by Dr. Brady from one *‘Chal-
lenger’’ station only, viz., No. 161, to the west of Tasmania
at 2600 fathoms. Cythere lepralioides is a South Atlantic
form occurring here for the first time.
List OF FORAMINIFERA IN ABOVE SAMPLE, FROM 1122
FATHOMS.
Biloculina depressa, d’Orb., var. murrhyna, Schw.
Miliolina tricarinata, d’Orb., sp.
Sigmoilina schlumbergeri, A. Silv.
Technitella legumen, Norman.
a raphanus, Brady.
Marsipella cylindrica, Brady.
Rhizammina indivisa, Brady.
Reophax fusiformis, Will., sp.
A dentaliniformis, Brady.
Haplophragmium canariense, d’Orb., sp.
Gaudryina pupoides, d’Orb.
Bulimina inflata, Seg.
ee aculeata, d’Orb.
Bifarina limbata, Brady, sp.
Bolivina textilarioides, Reuss.
a beyricht, Reuss.
pygmea, Brady.
Re obsoleta, Eley.
? Pleurostomella alternans, Schw.
Cassidulina murrhyna, Schw., sp.
51,
GLOBIGERINA OOZE.—CHAPMAN.
Lagena lagenoides, Will., sp.
Ah levigata, Reuss, sp.
5 quadricostulata, Reuss.
Nodosaria aff. proxima, Silv.
Pe mucronota, Neug. sp.
Uvigerina aculeata, d’Orb.
m3 pygmea, d’Orb.
+ angulosa, Will.
Globigerina bulloides, d’Orb.
fs triloba, Reuss.
a dubia, Egger.
ei rubra, d’Orb.
5 equilateralis, Brady.
im inflata, d’Orb.
Orbulina universa, d’Orb.
Pullenia spheroides, d’Orb., sp.
Spheroidina bulloides, d’Orb.
Patellina corrugata, Will.
Truncatulina ungeriana, d’Orb., sp.
3 culter, Parker & Jones.
si lobatula, W. & J., sp.
a humiis, Brady.
Pulvinulina canariensis, d’Orb., sp.
fe crassa, d’Orb., sp.
patagomca, d’Orb., sp.
* exigua, Brady.
- truncatulinoides, d’Orb., sp.
Rotalia soldaniu, d’Orb., sp.
Nonionina umbilicatula, Mont., sp.
pompilioides, F. & M., sp.
bo]
List OF OSTRACODA.
Cythere scabrocuneata, G. S. Brady.
i lepralioides, G. S. Brady.
Krithe producta, G. S. Brady.
Xestoleberis nana, G. S. Brady.
”
Cytheropleron abyssorum, G. S. Brady.
sp. nov., aff. X. setigera, G. S. Brady.
ed = ¢ ~~ o-
mel: : \ $i °
ot)
2 F ;
‘ * foe ae 7 phe ;
. - Coe i)
‘ " - : ‘ ,
» int 'oee F
* ’ ; * a,
rf 7 he
—* e®.. ‘ 4 .
7 .
” wes ; it
bo Sad ¥ i‘.
‘ae ‘os
ws a i
Po ae
3 > oe 43
oe ‘ can
aes , ~- us
* 5
a ¥ ‘
e A
oS
_ a at
‘ .
ua mA
+ all :
J
F a @ : ;
’ H
+ “2 d Y
oT
a
i
7” a va
= ‘ U ; ;
» :
5 €
. ~
. 2
. ‘ 4 4 ,
* . . r) ry a
° ‘
{
r .
‘ = ,
i
‘ .
, ‘a
iJ i mst
| oN ' a
{
~ . ij A | y . rr
\
- 5 ,
| a oe rn ee %y
e ’ a a)
ee Cd |
7 s : LD *) +5 ea is eer
’ ae
PRT CM Ve RM ly fh
; ae if Wiis ib =) a
’ ; 7 ’ . 7% sis -" a int s ho Dein Aas a
a : + an : co ial ube ¢ ae pedo
Be Ba: iy}? fy ae) i
ae hie eS pies oo 2
Bee aie” aun as
INDEX.
A
PAGE
ABASASSIS, Sp. . 58
abdominals, Hippocampus 29, 30
abyssorum, CYTHEROPTERON
310, 311
AGANTHIAS megalops 9
ACANTHOCHITES crocodilus 92
acanthodes, CLATHRIA ee wig
acanthopleura, EPITONIUM 93
ACARNUS, sp, : 143, 145
tenuis... Je .. 148
tortilis 568 ... 148
ACHELIDERMA, Sp. --- 138, 145
ACROPERNA scapha... soo
AGTAEON retusus --- 50g. ED
ACTINOBOLUS godeffroy? ..- 98
aculeata, BULIMINA
aculeata, UVIGERINA
aequilateralis, GLOBIGERINA 311
AmroBaTus australis a ks)
affinis, AUSTROBERYX ob 43
affinis, BrERYx “40, 43
affinis, HOPLOPTERYX Fen oe
affinis, PEMPHERIS ... . 45
AGBELAS, Sp. --- 139, 146
agrestis, DRILLIA ..- sco
alata, CLATHRIA soo BY)
alba, Mi1rROMORPHA rare OA!
albida, MYODORA .-. ae OL
albosutura, HUNATICINA .-- 94
albovittata, TRIPHORA son
alcyonioides, SPIRASTRELLA
124, 241
ALLANTOPHORA plicata 276
Gils see nap sca. CAND
allporti, CALLANTHIAS —.-- 51
allporti, CALLIOSTOMA — --- 92
allporti, MARGINELLA fb Oe
alta, CUSPIDARIA ..- 91
alternans, PEMGROSTOMELLA 310
altilabra, MARGINELLA .-- 94
ALVANIA olivacea ... Peel Oi7
salebrosa OS
amabilis, Soe CoeMLOPaIS 151
amabilis, VENBRICARDIA ... 91
PAGE
AMBASSIS gymmnocephalus ... 58
ramsayt se Be BU
AMPHIASTRELLA, Sp. ... 145
AMPHILECTUS ceratosus 244
Spots an 143, 144
AMPHITHALAMUS eS
mus , POS
bicolor 106
capricorneus... 106
columnius .-- = 106
costatus .. 93, 104, 106
dubitabilis 106
flamnveus 106
flindersir 106
frauenfeldi 106
frenchiensis ... ye eLOG
incidatus ae LOT
inclusus = OS
jacksont ss 105, 107
kershawt nae eee LO
olivaceus ane re LOR
pellucidus joo ONS
petterdr ace 105, 107
pulvillus aes LO
pyramidatus... 98, 107
rubicundus ... bon LOZ
salebrosus los
scrobiculator... 105, 108
See cod Sao ee Oo
subfuscus ... e108
tasmanicus ..- a 108
woodst Zia sos KOs!
anale, SCYLLIUM .. ae 3
analis, SoviiownINus a8 3
anchoratum, HCHINONEMA
152, 185, 189
anchoratum, var. dura,
EcHINONEMA 299
anchoratum, var. lamellosa,
Ecutnonama 210, 299
anchoratum, var. ramosa,
ECHINONEMA 298
anchoratus (var.), typtcus,
RHAPHIDOPHLUS 185,
194, 196
ANCILLA petterdi ... we 1Od
5]
314
“* ENDEAVOUR ’
PAGE
anemone, CONUS 112
ANEROCHALINA mirabilis 252
angasi, GAFRARIUM 06S
angasi, 'TRIPHORA ... seo,
angulata, CITHNA ... fen OO
angulifera, CLATHRIA 24.7
angulosa, UVIGBRINA 311
annulata, LiotiaA ... re 92
annilata, Rissoa 106
ANOGRAMMA, sp. ... san
unomalu, ECHINOCHALINA
286, 292
anomalus, APOGONOPS OO
ANTHEROCHALINA tenwis-
pina 261
ANTHIAS extensus ... OS
pleurotenia ... coo eABO)
pulchellus ... Soe 1540)
Sp ees sis OW)
antiaustralis, CHLAMYS 91, 96
antiaustralis, PaorEn ae 96
antipodum, CLUPRA sone ali
APOGONOPS anomalus ae 55
Si0se) sures ate cos O13)
approvina, RIssoa ... 105
approvimus, AMPHITHALA-
MUS 25 105
aquila, MyLIoBaTIs ties 15
aquila, RAJA oor ene g ts)
arachis, CYLICHNA ... St 95
arborea, CLATHRIA (PLECTISPA)
204, 280
arborea, ECHINOCLATHRIA
280, 3800
arborea, PLECTISPA 208, 280, 300
arboresceus, MyxILLAa 148
arbuscula, CLATHIODENDRON
147, 295, 298
arbuscula, CLATHRISSA 146, 158
297, 298
arbuscula, CRELLA ... 151
ARCA pistachia Sa ae OL
arctica, SAXICAVA ... oa 92
arcuata, LEPTOBASIS sn 43
arcuophora, CLATHRIA 211, 228
234, 260, 263
arenacea, CRELLA... 157
arenacea (var.), incrustans,
CRELLA OTeeloes
160, 299
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAGE
arenacea, PLUMOHALICHON-
DRIA re neo 1Ks{0)
arenifera, ECHINOCLATHRIA 287
arenosa, PHOLADOMYA Bee gpI
arenosum, ECHINODICTYUM
139, 142
ARGENTINA elongata Zag 1 dls}
ARGYROTHECA, sp. ... bon, AEE
armatus, CHATODON mie 54
armatus, ENOPLOSUS aoe 54
armillata, 'TRIPHORA om 93
ARTEMISINA, sp. : vant, LAO
asperrimus, CHLAMYS OO
ASYMMETRON australis... 303
bassanum 308, 304.
cultellum 305
hectort 305
lucayanum soo | BOB
Sd ace a .. BOA
atelodes, CYNOSCION OS
atelodus, OTOLITHUS Bae 63
ATHERINA dannevigi tee = wot
hepsetoides ... son
hepsetus, ‘ia soo
microstoma ... sel SOS
Sipser aco Soo
ATHIAS rasor ao 500 = es
atkinsoni, CUNA a8 Sil
atkinsoni, CYLICHNA Be OF
atkinsoni, PYRENE ... ce 20
atkinsoni, SCHISMOPE Man Oe
atkinsoni, TURRITELLA ... 93
atun, SCOMBER a 80
atun, THYRSITES ... 80
AULENA crassa 286, 287
gigantea, var. macro-
pora 285
lava 287
Sine | Se Ris oan KS
AULOPUS purpurissatus ... 22
AULOSPONGUS sp. 145
australiensis, HCHINOCHALINA
288
australiensis, OPHLITA-
SPONGIA Stoe ae4sts}
australiensis, WILSONELLA
239, 300
australis, AETOBATUS ste 15
australis, CAPROS ... Sab Asif
australis, CAPULUS 109
australis, CISTELLA,,. 114
PAGE
160, 197,
239, 299
australis, CLATHRIA
australis, COCLORHYNCHUS 38
australis, CYTYUS 86, 87
australis, GALEUS 9
australis, LHPIDOLEPRUS 38
australis, MACRURUS 38
australis, MUR#NICHTHYS 20
australis, MyLIOBATIS 15
australis, PATELLA... 109
australis platet, CALLANTHIAS 51
australis, PLUMOHALICHON-
DRIA 160, 165
australis, RAIA 10
australis, RAJA 10
australis, RINGICULA 1138
australis, SCISSURELLA ... 92
australis, TRACHICHTHYS ... 40
australis, VENERICARDIA .... 97
australis, WILSONELLA ... 299
australis, ZnuS ee 82
austrina, LIMHA .... sei, ROL:
AUSTROBERYX affinis 43
gerrardi Al
lineatus 43
Sis ease : 39
aviaerata, PYRENE ... 95
INDEX.
axicostata, MITROMORPHA... 94
AXINELLA chalinoides 270
chalinoides var.
cribrosa 270
Sp. 152
symbiotica 237
axinelloides, OPHLITASPONGIA
188, 268, 272
B
badia, Rissoa 107
badia, Rissoa (ScROBS) 107
balantium, CLIo 95
barbata, MopIoLARIA 91
barbatus, PHysicuLuUs 38
barbatus, PSEUDOPHYCIS 38
BARLEEIA subfusca... 108
bassanum, ASYMMETRON 3038, 304
bassensis, CLUPEA (Romo-
LOBUS) fe. 16
bassensis, SILLAGO ... 60, 61, 62
bassiana, ONOBA 108
bassi, LIMA ... = aioe OL
bathentoma, DAPHNELLA ... 94
315
PAGE
BATHYARGA perversidens ... 91
BATzELLA, sp. 143, 144.
beachportensis, NUCULA 91
beachportensis, PYRENE 95
beddomei, POLINICES 94
beddomei, Rissoa 106
belcheri, BRANCHIOSTOMA B05
BERyYX affinis 40, 43
decadactylus... .. 40
gerrardi 40, 41
lineatus 40
Bie ane ei 1
beyrichi, BOLIVINA ... sao OHIO)
bicolor, AMPHITHALAMUS ... 106
bicolor, Rissoa 106
BIFARINnA limbata S50, cs! k0)
bilamellatum, ECHINODIC-
TYUM 175
bilineata, SERIOLELLA 36
bilineatus, PEPTONEMUS 36
BILoOcuLIna depressa 310
bimaculata, VENERICARDIA 91, 98
biplicata, MARGINELLA 94
bispiculata, SIPHONOCHINA
255, 275
bispinosa, CLATHRIA 211
bispinosus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS
177, 215
_bivaricata, TYPHIs... 95
bizonarius, CHILODACTYLUS 64
Boulvina beyrichi ... 310
obsoleta 310
pygmea 310
Semen aes sue 310
textilarioides 310
bostockii, SILLAGO ... 60, 63
bractea, Myrtma 92, 99
brama, NEPTONEMUS 34
brama, SERIOLELLA 34.
BRAMICHTHYS, sp. 80
woodwardr ...80, 81
BRANCHIOSTOMA belcheri ... 3805
capense : 306
braziert, CRYPTOPORA 95
brazieri, MyRTmA Save 99
breviceps, MURZNICHTHYS... 20
brevispina, 'THALASSODENDRON
179, 185, 1938, 202, 300
brevispinus (var.), typicus,
RHAPHIDOPHLUS
185, 193, 300
316 “ENDEAVOUR”
PAGE
breviusculus, PSEUDOPHYCIS 38
BuuimMina aculeata... soo i)
inflata ASG aco HL
Vite one soo | GIO)
bulimoides, LIMACINA Sete 15)
bullata, Lima ae Joa.
bulloides, GLOBIGERINA ... 311
bulloides, SPpHHROIDINA ... 311
burrws, SILLAGO ... ae 62
C
cacticutis, DicryoCcyLINDRUS 297
celata, CLATHRIA 139, 212, 217
CAESIOPERCA extensa OS
lepidoptera ... 50, 54
yasor ... bee one 50
SO dec ‘as OO
cespitosa, PLUMOHALICHON-
DRIA aan soo 4)
CALLANTHIAS allporti eee oll!
plater... See ee 51
plater qustralis wat 51
CALLIOSTOMA allportr 500
columnariun sop |
legrandi 505 son
meyerr 5k soo |
retiarwny ... ase 92
callorynchus, CALLORHYN-
CHUS sat a 16
calopora, CLAVTHRIA sop HL
calva, PHENACOLEPAS soo)
calva, PYRENE = OO
calyculata, Myrinicarpra... 92
calyptra, CAPULUS . ELLOS
CALYPTRAEA calyptraeformis 93
calyptraeformis, CALYPTRAEA 93
calyptra, PATELLA ... soo IO)
CAMPAGES furcifera ee let
jaffaensis 95, 114
Sees oSc see LAs
canariense, HAPLOPHRAGMIUM
310
conariensis, PULVINULINA... 311
cana, TRIPHORA ... sco 83
CANCELLARIA pergradata ... 94
capense, BRANCHIOSTOMA ... 306
capricorneus, AMPHITHALA-
MUS nee LOG
CAPROS australis... Si
CaAPULUS australis ... eee LOS,
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
CAPULUS calyptra
daniel
devotus
Si. Soe
CARANX declivis
georgianus
platessa :
CaRpita (ACTINOBOLUS)
godeffroyi ...
quoyi...
racutt
raoult
rosulenta
CaRDIUM pulchellum
carponemus, CHILODACTYLUS 66
carponemus, DACTYLOSPARUS 66
CARPONEMUS, sp.
carteri, EcHINOCLATHRIA
2
CASSIDULINA muirrhyna
cavata, TEREBRATULINA
CAVOLINA inflexa
trispinosa
virgula oes
CENTRACION philippi
CENTRISCOPS humerosus
Sps- ee:
CENTRISCUS Foumter osus
scolopax :
CEPHALOSCYLLIUM isabellan
laticeps
sabella
CERATOPSIS, sp.
ceratosus, AMPHILECTUS
CERBARIS, sp.
CERITHIOPSIS dannevigi
geniculosus
132
244.
146
"93, 109
93, 110
cervicornis, RHAPHIDOPHLUS' 177
CESTRACION guleatus
CHBTODON armatus
CHALINA polychotoma
CHALININE sp. :
chalinoides, AXINELLA
54
252
221
270
chalinoides, OPHLITASPONGIA 27
CHANDA gymnocephalus 58
ramsayt ; 58
chartacea, CLATHRIA 141,
208, 265
CHEILOBRANCHUS rufus 18
CHEILODACTYLUS gibbosus,.. 64
sp. 65
vittatus
CHILOBRANCHUS rufus
CHILODACTYLUS bizonarius
carponemus ...
macropterus ...
vizonarius
CHIMERA ogilbyi
CHIONRE despecta
gallinula
mesodesma
PAGE
65
18
64
66
66
64
15
100
100
‘92, 100
striatissima ... : 92
CHLAMYS antiaustralis ion 96
asperrimus 96
radiatus 96
CHLOROPHTHALMUS
nigripinnis 22
CHONDROPSIS, sp. 173
CHROMIS chromis 56 75
hypsilepis aT 3, 74
immaculatus... 74
CHTHAMALOPTERYX
melbournensis ste 63
ciliata, SILLAGO 59, 61, 62
cimex, TURBO 105
cinereus, HEPTANCHUS 2
cinereus, NOTIDANUS 2
cinereus, SQUALUS ... 2
(CINGULA) Rissoa + rineragia 107
cirratus, PRISTIOPHORUS ... 9
curratus, PRISTIS 9
CIRSONELLA weldii ... 92
CISTELLA australis ... 114
SPs) = ack: 114
CITHNA angulata 93
CLATHIODENDRON ay Raoeeuibe 147
clathrata, CLATHRIA 205, 215
clathrata, CLATHRIA
(THNACIA) 187
clathrata, MicRocIona 209
clathrata, TENACIA.. peli)
clathratum, Ecuinopicryum 144
CLATHRIA acanthodes Madi
alata ... 239
angulifera .. 247
arcuophora ... 211, 228
234, 260, 263
australis 160, 197,
239, 299
bispinosa 211
celata 212, 217
callata 139
{NDEX.
317
PAGE
calopora ae nog, aul
chartacea 141, 208, 265
clathrata 205, 215
coppingeri 215
costifera 215
decumbens 239
diechinata so alll
dura i: 239, 242
elegantula 241
favosa son lta)
frondosa 237, 263
imperfecta. w. 242
inanchorata ... 206, 215
indica 242
indurata son AY
jugosa 177, 187
macropora 16], 165,
240, 299
mollis 141, 207, 243
multipes 300
multipora 178
myxilloides .. 242
partita 223, 254
pellicula 208
prniformis : 241
(PLEcrispa) < ar ner eu
204, 280
pyramida 239, 297
(RHAPHIDOPHLUS)
spiculosa ... aon welletel
rubens 179, 2038, 218.
224. 299
Sp. 186, 138, 145, 175,
205, 288
spicata 210, 215, 226, 299
striata ‘ sou, wlll
(Tenacta) clathrata 187
tenebrata 211
tenuifibra a doo) sell
transiens 205, 226, 254
transita fe s.. 209
typica .. 185, 196 208
CLATHRIODENDRON arbuscula
295, 298
irregularis 296, 298
nigra ... 296, 298
Gis. 206 ape 145, 295
CLATHRIOPSAMMA lobosa 239, 300
reticulata 177, 300
sp. 175, 237
’
318 “RNDEAVOUR’
PAGE
CLATHRISSA arbuscula 146, 151,
152, 158, 297, 298
elegans 5 146, 298
pumila 146, 168, 298
pumila var. rubra 170, 298
sp. 138, 142, 145, 146,
152, 165
Cuio balantium wae as {OD
pyramidata... ste PE
CLIONA, Sp. ... oe 5650
CLIONOPSIS platei ... soon pelle)
Go S06 ide soo
clopetaria, PLOCAMIA .. =145
(CLUPANODON) CLUPEA neopil-
cChardus ... bat 17
CLUPEA antipodum... soa epi
(CLUPANODON) neopil-
chardus ... ae 7
(PomMoLoBus) bassen-
SUS) -- BAG fe 16
Sajax ... Sse Oe ales}
sprattus is gaa KG)
coccinea, lOTROCHOTA non les}
CoccuLina tasmanica coe,
C@LORHYNCHUS australis... 38
mortont Bae ave 38
SOs, — Bae seis Rae 1
collare, PARASCYLLIUM © ... a
colonensis, FORCEPIA 142, 143
columnaria, MARGINELLA... 94
columnaria, RISSOA pee OG:
columnariwn, CALLIOSTOMA 92
columnarius, AMPHITHAL-
AMUS... a 106
columnarius, PHILINE ee (95
comma, CUNA =ee ee 91
commensalis, YORSIA sf. 149
compressa, CONDYLOCARDIA 92
compressa, PEMPHERIS 45, 47
compressa, PSBUDOCLATHRIA 245
concentrica, CUNA ... bem eo) |
concentrica, CYRILLA nae 91
CONDYLOCARDIA compressa 92
conectens, WILSONELLA 244, 245
confragosa, OPHLITASPONGIA 255
CONGERMURANA habenata 18
CONGROMURANA longicauda 19
Cona@Rus habenatus Boe 18
conspicillatus, CORYTHROICH-
THYS aa cee
conulosa, LATRUNCULIA ... 126
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAGE
conulosum, STYLOSTICHON... 148
CONUS anemone Sat Bee val}
converus fen Bon. LILY
superstes ‘ise 94, 111
converus, CONUS... et Lb)
coppingeri, CLATHRIA meee iliey
CORALLIOPHILA lischkeana 95
coralliophilus, RHAPHI-
DOPHLUS ... Seem LINE
CorBIS percostata ... 92, 99
Site" ade Ses “a2 99
CORIARIUS semiradiatus ... 92
CORNULUM sp. ae 1 LAS
corolla, PUNCTURELLA oO
corrugata, PATBLLINA poet eeallal
CoRYTHROICHTHYS conspicil-
latus atic LAU 27
intestinalis ... ae 26
margaritifer aero)
phillipi Wes ccc,
waitei ae sean) 24h
costatus, AMPHITHALAMUS 93,
104, 106
costifera, CLATHRIA seo Allis
cowl, GIBBULA aE eae LOR
CRAMBE crambe aoe sq ea
crassa, AULENA Lab Stn CAST
crassa, ECHINOCLATHRIA ... 287
crassa, HCHINOCLATHRIA
(AULENA) ... 286
crassa, HOLOPSAMMA wap PASH
crassa, PULVINULINA ero lal
CRASSATELLITES probleema 91
producta nee eel
crassum, PSAMMOPEMMA ... 287
craticia, POLYMASTIA eae an 4!)
cratitius, RHAPHIDOPHLUS
177, 187
crebristriata, NACELLA ... 93
CRELLA arbuscula ... Sean Lua
arenacea 157
incrustans 151, 152, 156
incrustans var. arenacea
158, 160, 197, 299
incrustans var. digitata
153, 156, 159
uncrustans var. levis 153,
164, 299
incrustans var. mam-
millata ... oeelG2
PAGE
incrustans Var. perra-
mosa 153, 159
unerustans var. punila
153, 168, 298
incrustans var. rubra
153, 170, 298
levis sos dliasy/
pumila var. rubr cas Keg)
sp. 138, 146, 152
cribrosa (var.), chalinoides,
AXINELLA.. ; 270
crocodilus, ACANTHOCHITES 92
cruciatus, RAJA 14
cruciatus, UROLOPHUS 14
CRYPTOPORA brazieri 95
cultellum, ASYMMETRON 3805
cultellum, HPIGONICHTHYS... 3806
culter, TRUNCATULINA SIL
cumingti, DIVARICELLA 92
cumingii, MBGASELLA 95
CuNA atkinsoni 91
comma 91
concentrica 91
delta 91
hamata 91
obliquissimea ... 91
curvichela, WILSONELLA 238,
247, 251
CUSPIDARIA alta 91
cuvieri, LABRICHTHYS : 76
CYAMIOMACTRA mactroides 92
CYAMON, sp.. ; 145
cyanogenys, LABRIC) HTHYS. 76
cyanogenys, Pseupotasrus 76
CYCLOPECTEN favus... OL
cyclostoma, Rissoa.., 106, 108
CYCLOSTREMA denselamin-
atum 92
homalon 92
jafiaensis 92
CYLICHNA arachis 95
atkinsoni 95
cylindrica, MARCIPELLA 310
Cymatium kampylum 94,
oleariwm G4
CyNoscion atelodus 63
CYPSILURUS speculiger 30
CYRILLA concentrica, 91
CYTHERE lepralioides 311
scabrocuneata 311
319
INDEX.
PAGE
CYTHEROPTERON abyssorum
310, 311
CyTTuUS austrahs ... ..86, 87
nove-zelandie 85
D
DAcTYLOSPARUS carponemus 66
macropterus ... 66
Se, 506 So ee OO
danieli, CAPULUS zs 109
Danita telebathia... 92, 102
CUNT ae LO?
dannevigi, ADHERIN NA 0 31
dannevigi, CERITHIOPSIS 93, 109
DAPHNELLA bathentoma 94
fenestrata ... 508 94
legrandi S00 WS
triseriata 94
decadactylus, BERYx 40
DECAPTERUS, sp. 79
declivis, CARANX 79
declivis, TRACHURUS oo wD
decorata, MAVHILDA 93, 110
decrosa, PRONUCULA 91
decumbens, CLATHRIA 239
delecta, RINGICULA... LS
delicata, VENERICARDIA 91
deléa, CUNA ... 91
dermiasa. PUNCTURELLA ‘92, 101
DENDORICELLA, Spee 144, 145
denselaminatum, CYcLos-
TREMA 92
denselineata, LIoTia 92
denseplicuta, DR1ILLIA 94
dentaliniformis, REOPHAX... 310
DENTALIUM lubricatum ... 95
thetidis Sey JIS}
denticulatus, OPTONURUS... 38
depressa, BILOCULINA 310
DESMACIDONIDA, sp. .. 146
DESMACIDON, sp. 143, 144
despecta, CHIONE 100
devotus, CAPULUS 93
DIALa twmnida LOT,
DicryocyLINDRUS cacticutis 297
diechinata, CLATHRIA 211
diemenensis, RISSOA 107
digitata, ECHINOCHALINA... 299
digitata (var.), incrustans
CRELLA 158, 156, 159
’
320 ‘ ENDEAVOUR ”
PAGE
digitata, 'THALASSODENDRON
202, 288, 299
dilecta, DRILLIA ... nee (OA
dilecta, VENERICARDIA Aap 92
DIPLODEMIA, sp. ... ZOO
disjuncta, TRIPHORA esl 93
DIVARICELLA cumingii .... 92
diversiancorata, MyxiLua... 144
dobula, SERIOLELLA ee tl
DRAGMATYLE, sp. ... 138, 145
DRILLIA agrestis... ay 94
denseplicata ... Ree ee
dilecta es Joe O4.
dulcis... sais me, OA
hectorquia ... ee Ot
hedleyi are seo OM
jaffaensis —... eee hoa:
lacteola Bae oe 94
sawed... ane 5a 94.
tricarinata ... tay 94.
trophonoides... oz, OA
woodsi rer Mer 9A
dubia, GLOBIGERINA son lll
dubitabilis, AMPHITHALAMUS 106
dubitabilis, Rissoa ... LOG
duleis, DRILLIA mils Ee 94
dura var. anchoratiwn,
ECHINONEMA ... 299
dura, CLATHRIA 239, 242
dura (var.), rwbens, 'THALAS-
SODENDRON 178, 202,
218, 299
dura, WILSONELLA ... seo) As!
H
ECHINOCHALINA anomala
286, 292
australiensis... Soo sks:
digitata SoC sao | SY)
glabra 5a8 206, 292
wtermedia 254, 286, 294
reticulata ... 287, 289
sp. 142, 146, 206, 253, 288
ECHINOCLATHRIA arborea
280, 300
GNENAT CTC eer 28
(AULENA) crassa... 286
cartert 276, 278, 284
crassa ae 287
elegans CoO 280, 3800
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAGE
fuvus ... i 276, 285
gigantea ace ZOO
glabra 275, 288, 290
gracilis 3 Ol
laces Soe ee Z8O
WUACVOPOra 55 itis 284
ranvosa 204, 252, 277,
280, 285, 300
rotunda 282
subhispida ... ee eo
tenwis 261, 264
EcHINODICTYUM arenosum
139, 142
bilamellatum goa hehe
clathratum ... tee BSA
elegans 171, 299
(KALYKENTERON) elegans
208
ridleyi ia 141, 151
Ss occ 145, 237, 288
spongiosum 142, 151
ECHINONEMA anchoratum
152, 185, 189
anchoratum var. dura 299
anchoratum var. lanel-
losa Ses 210, 299
anchoratum var.
ramosa aa sa) 6298
flabelliformis Hecre tsts)
incrustans ... 154, 155
levis 161, 164, 165, 299
pectiniformis 185, 19-4
pumila ase soe Al(ats)
rubra 161, 164, 165, 299
SD eee a0it coo 5)
typicun es 185, 188
echinonematissima, WILSON-
ELLA ... Sie cae. ete
EcTorRIsMA granulata cat 91
Ecryoporyx, sp. 136, 138, 145
EcryoOMYXILLA, sp.... 136, 145
EcryoNninaé, sp. ; sean -9Is)
ECTYONOPSIS, sp. ... ony LAG
elegans, CLATHRISSA 146, 298
elegans, HCHINOCLATHRIA
280, 800
elegans, EcHinopicryum 171, 299
elegans, HCHINODICTYUM
(K ALYKENTERON) 203
elegans, KALYKENTERON ... 171
elegans, PLECTISPA 208, 280, 800
elegantula, CLATHRIA ee eel
elevatus, HisviopTERUS ... 67
elevatus, MACRORHAM-
PHOSUS Boe ade 23
elevatus, GANCLISTIUS nao LeU
elkingtoni, Na'rica ... 94, 110
elongata, ARGENTINA Room ates,
elongata, PaMPHERIS sou 47
elongatus, 'VRACHICHTHYS .., 40,
E MARGINULA supe rba aii 92
EMMELICHTHYS nitidus ... 66
emphysema, MELONANCHORA 112
ENOPLOSUS arnuttys a a4
ensicula, POROLEDA Sar 91
epallava, TRIPHORA En) 98
ephippiwm, LABRIGHTHYS ... 76
EPIGONICHTHYS culle!lum... 306
HPIGRUS ischnus ... sae 93
HPINEPHELUS septemfuscia-
EDS ane onG 49
EprroniumM ac anthopleur a. 93
valida Sue ic 93
erectus, LIMOPSIS ... Bore
erectus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS ... 177
ericia, VERTICORDIA 91, 96
ESPERIOPSIS, sp. ... wn 148
EucHELUS tasinanicus Seer OP
eucosmos, LiMopsIs... Darren ts}
EuLima munita ... oe LELO
tasmanica ... 5 LOS
EUNATICINA albosutura ... 94
exigua, IANTHINA ... foe 498
exigua, PULVINULINA so) 2 eli
Exoce@rus speculiger spo. 0)
EXONAUTES speculiger sho oi)
extensa, CASIOPERCA oer 538
extensus, ANTHIAS ... Sey a
1
faber, Zeus ... =o: a60 82
farnelli, HistTroprerus at 72
fasciatus, SOLENOGNATHUS 27, 28
favosa, CLATHRIA ... Pa 86
favosus var. typicus, Rua-
PHIDOPHLUS 186, 201
favus, CYCLOPECTEN eee ll
favus, ECHINOCLATHRIA 276, 285
fenestrata, DAPHNELLA ... 94
ferrugineum, PARASCYLLIUM a
filifer, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 177, 187
321
PAGE
jilifer var. spinifera, RHA-
PHIDOPHLUS son alfsiy/
filosa, Rissoa S00 ... 104
jimbriata, PHILOBRYA noth all
FISSURISEPTA, Sp. ... “6, 6 LOI
jistulatus, FUSIFER... son. tet
flubellata, PHAKELLIA Sone RC
flabelliformis, ECHINONEMA = 185
flamia, Rissoa he sso | LOG
flammea, Rissoa ... son, KOs:
flammea, SABANHA... ee elOG
flanuneus, AMPHITHALAMUS 106
flava, VERMICULARIA ae 93
flexuosa, 'THYASIRA... was 92
flindersi, MARGINELLA ... 94
flindersti, AMPHITHALAMUS 106
flindersii, RIssoina... Pe OG
FoRCEPIA colonensis 142, 143
Si 608 143, 145, 150
forsteri, SCOMBRESOX idee 180)
frauenfeldi, AMPHITHALAMUS
106
fraueifeldi, Rissoa LOG
Jreuchiensis, AMPHITH-
ALAMUS ... v7, LOG
frenchiensis, RIssoa woe LO6
Jroudosa, CLATHRIA 237, 263
fugitiva, LEprorHyRa 92, 102
Julgurata, MARGINELLA 94, 110
fumarium, PUNCTURELLA
92, 100, 101
furcifera, CAMPAGES snot AE
FUuSIFER fistulatus ... Soo BY)
Spx | kes poo 142, 145
fusiformis, RHOPHAX 506 BIO)
G
gabrieli, MARGINELLA one Oe
GAFRARIUM angasi... S00, |
galeatus, CESTRACION 306 3
guleatus, GYROPLEURODUS 3
galerita, PUNCTURELLA ... 101
GALEUS australis... ; 9
gallinago, MacroRHAMPHOSUS 23
gallinula, CHIONE .., Sag 110.0)
GASTEROSTEUS punctatus ... 36
gatlifi, MANGELIA ... o. §«=©6 DL
GAUDRYINA pupoides poe «33! (0)
geminus (var.) typrcus, Rwa-
PHIDOPHLUS 185, 191
gemmegens, 'RIPHORA US
’
322 ‘“HNDEAVOUR’
PAGE
geniculosus, CERITHIOPSIS 93,110
georgianus, CARANX ee) Oo
gerrardi, AUSTROBERYX ... 41
gerrardi, BERYX ... 40, 41
GERRES melbowrnensis ae ae
gertrudis, Rissoina soa
gibbosus, CHEILODACTYLUS 64:
GIBBULA covi ae soa LOL
ocellina ae 92, 101
tiberiana ve LOW
(T'rocuus) glyptus ... 102
gigantea, HCHINOCLATHRIA 285
gigantea var. macropora,
AULENA ae 285
gigantea var. macropora,
HaLME .... sae ASD
GILBERTIA senvicincta Boo Oy
glabra, Be ese ee 206,
275, 288, 290, 292
glauca, PRIONACE ... aoe i)
glaucus, SQUALUS ... nue 9
GLOBIGERINA eguilateralis 311
bulloides a 306 ull
dubia... ae soo. . Bll
inflata wnt aoe LN
ooze ... ie ee OO)
rubra... nee Sy oll
De: “ae ont 309, 310
triloba ace “er oul
glomerosa, ONOBA ... 108
gloria-maris, Monocenrrris 44.
GLYCYMERIS pectinoides ... 91
tenwicostatus aoe 5 el
GLYPHISODON, sp. ... sone) O15)
glyptus, TROCHUS (GIBBULA) 102
godeffroyi, CARDITA (ACTINO-
BOLUS)... sen
GONIISTIUS vittatus OD
ViZzONariUs ... pe 64:
GONIOCIDARIS tubaria soe LO)
graciliformis, HipPOCAMPUS 29
gracilis, HCHINOCLATHRIA 257 |
gracilis, SILLAGO,.. 60, 62
grandis, LovELLA ... ee 38
granvfera, TRIPHORA :
granulata, EororisMA =... 91
gravida, PLUMOHALICHON-
DRIA 3 soo JUGS)
.
GRAYELLA, sp. 500 . 142
guithert, Microrynoren.a 143
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAG
gymnocephalus, AMBASSIS... 58
gymnocephalus, CHANDA ... 58
gynnotus, MuRNICHTHYS 20
GYROPLEURODUS galeatus ... 3
H
habenata, CONGERMURA[NA 18
habenatus, CONGRUS ae 18
HAtMe gigantea var.
macropora eEZSO
hamata, CuNA ae aie 91
HAMIGERA, sp. Ke ee 145
HAPLOPHRAGMIUM canariense 3810
sp. ue si saa, - @h0)9)
hardwickii, SoLEGNATHUS... 28
harrissoni, PUNCTURELLA... 101
hectorguia, DRILLIA ose, QA
hectori, ASYMMBTRON sto GA0}5)
hedleyi, Drinuta... Bee) oe
hedleyi, HerTHROPLEURON ... 304
hedleyt, SOLHTELLINA aoe or
HeLcIoNntiscus illabratus ... 98
HELiasres hypsilepsis base, aif)
immaculatus... sce on
HEMIPLEUROTOMA mayi ... 95
hemipsila, PUNCTURELLA ... 101
HeEMIscyLiium variolatum U
hepsetoides, ATHHRINA ane 32
hepsetus, ATHERINA Ae
HE&PTANCHUS cinereus oe 2
indicus ae ae 2
HEPTRANCHIAS indicus... 2
perlo ... bos wad 2
HETEROCLATHRIA, sp. 141, 145
HTrERODON’US philippi ... 2
HETEROPLEURON hedleyi ... 304
hilwm, MANGILIA ... soee OA
Hippocampus abdominalis 29,30
graciliformis pop)
Hipponyx, sp. : Te LO9
HistioprEervs elevatus ... 67
farnelli os sen = oH
labiosus ane ee te
recurvirostris Seamed
HISTODERMA, sp. ... OAS
HistODERMELLA, sp. 142, 148,
145
HOLOPSAMMA crassa SG. ZASih
HO.Loress sevlineatus OO
HoLoTHURIA, sp. ... iss eel
homaton, CYCLOSTREMA .,. 92
PAGE
Hom@opicrya, sp.... 144.
HopLopreryx «ffinis 43
lewesiensis 40
SVs 0c 400 40
Hopbosretuus mediterraneus 40
sp. ae ae 40
hulliana, RiIssoa 93, 108
humerosus, CANTRISCUS 24
hunvilis, TRUNCATULINA ... 311
HYMENANCORA, sp. 137, 138,
145, 147
HyMERAPHIA, sp. 1387, 138, 145,
208
HYMERHABDIA, Sp. ... .. 146
HyMeErrocHora, sp. 136, 187, 145
HYPOPLECTRODES senicincta 50
hypsilepis, CHROMIS 73, 74
hypsilepis, H®LIASTES goo. hs
Hypsipors microlepis 75
Hypsypors microlepis 75
sp. 75
I
IANTHINA exviqgua a eS
illabratus, HELCIONISCUS ... 92
imbrex, RISSOA 103
IMBRICARIA porphyria 95
immaculatus, CHROMIS 74.
immaculatus, HELIAS'TES 74:
unvperfecta, CLATHRIA .. 242
inanchorata, CLATHRIA 206, 215
incerta, LIoTA 92
incidata, SABAN@MA... 107
incidatus, AMPHITHALAMUS 107
inclusus, AMPHI'THALAMUS 105
incompleta, RISSOA ... 93
incrustans Var. arenacea,
CRELLA 158, 160, 197,
299
incrustans, CRELLA 151, 152, 156
incrustans var. digitata,
CRELLA 1538, 156, 159
incrustans var. levis,
CRELLA 153, 164, 299
incrustans var. maminilata,
CRELLA 162
tnerustans Var. perraiiosa,
CRELLA 153, 159
incrustans, PLUMOHALICHON-
DRIA ste LO
INDEX.
323
PAGE
incrustans var. pumila,
CRELLA 1538, 168, 298
licrustans var. rubra,
CRELLA 153, 170, 298
tidica, CLATHRIA 242
undicus, HEPTANCHUS 5G 2
indicus, HBPTRANCHIAS ... 2
indiscreta, MARGINELLA 94
indivisa, RHIZAMMINA 310
indurata, CLATHRIA 299
inflata, BULIMINA 310
inflata, GLOBIGERINA 311
inflata, Limacina 95
inflera, CAVOLINA 5 33)
mmfrequens, PARAMYXILLA... 141
inornata, OPHLITASPONGIA
264, 265
insignis, RIGHARDSONIA 72
integra, 'TURQUETIA 92
intermedia, ECHINOCHALINA
254, 294
intermedia, ECHINOCLATHRIA
286, 294
intermedius, TRACHICHTHYS 40
intestinalis, CORY THROICH-
THYS eae awe 0
intestinalis, SYNGNATHUS... 26
IoPHON, sp. ... 136, 145
LorROCHOTA coccinea oe was
sp. 136, 142, 144, 145
irregularis, CLATHRIODEN-
DRON 296, 298
isabella, CBPHALOSCYLLIUM 6
isabella, SQUALUS ... aes 6
ischnus, HPIGRUS 93
ISOSILLAGO maculata 60
punctata sca 9)
sp. 59, 60
J
jucksoni, AMPHITHALAMUS
105, 107
jacksonvana, LISSODENDORYX 298
jucksoniana, MyXILLA 298
jacksoniensis, MACTRA 92
juffuensis, CAMPAGES 95, 114.
juffaensis, CYCLOSTREMA 92
jufiaensis, DRILLIA... . 94
jujfaensis, MAGASBELLA goo flute!
jafiaensis, PYRENE ... 500
324 ‘6 BNDEAVOUR ””
PAGE
japonicus, SCOMBER 80
jogosa, CLATHRIA Wil Wsitf
jowbini, MAGELLANIA 114:
K
(KALYKENTERON) ECHINODIC-
TYUM eleguns 208
elegans 171
silex Nzalt
sp. hee 173
kampylum, CYMATIUM G4.
kershawi, AMPHITHALAMUS ~~ 107
kershawi, RISSOINA... 107
kesteveni, PUNCTURELLA 101
kingensis, MANGILIA 94
klunzingeri, PEMPHERIS 47
KRiTHE producta 310, 311
KRAUSSINA tasmanica 95
L
labiosa, MAccULLOCHIA 2
labiosus, HisTriopTERUS 72
LABRICHTHYS cwviert 67
cyanogenys ... Sfapie (lO
ephippiun ... oe aio)
mortont au Poe eee
psittacula ... aod
rubicunda ... pate ai
vestita eae WG
LABRUS psittaculus... Boo ee hall
(LauroGa) psittucula 77
lacteola, DRILLIA 94,
levigata, LAGENA 311
levis, HCHINONEMA... 165
Laagena levigata 311
lagenoides . dil
quadricostuluta 311
lagenoides, LAGENA... : 311
lamella (var.) rubens, THALAS-
SODENDRON 178, 218,
lamellosa (var.) anchoratum,
ECHINONEMA 210, 289
lamellosa (var.) rubens, THA-
LASSODENDRON 178
lamellosa, WILSONELLA 299
laticeps, CEPHALOSCYLLIUM 6
laticeps, SCYLLIUM... 6
LATRUNCULIA conulosa 126
lava, AULENA : Ce ol
lawa, ECHINOCLATHRIA ... 286
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
| PAGE
| Leva meliacea : 91
legrandi, CALLIOSTOMA 92
legrandi, DAPHNELLA ae 94.
legqumen, TECHNITELLA 309, 310
| LEPIDOLEPRUS australis 38
| lepidoptera, CHSIOPERCA 50, 54
| lepralioides, CyTHERE 310, 311
LEPTOBASIS arcuatau sce 1415}
Spiene . 148, 145
LEPTOSIA, sp. 137, 188, 145
| Leproruyra fugitiva 92, 102
| rosea ... 92
levis, CRELLA = 157
levis, ECHINONEMA... 161, 164,
165, 299
| levis (var.) incrustans,
CRELLA 153, 164, 299
lewesiensis, HoPLOPTERYX ... 40
lewini, SPHYRNA 9
lewini, ZYGHNA 9
| lignea, PARACORDYLA 132
| Laima bassi .. 91
bullata 91
LIMACINA bulimoides 95
inflata Gd
LIMA austrina 91
murrayr SL
parvula 91
LIMOPSIS erectus 91
ewcosmos 91
tenisoni 9]
linea, Mopiona 91
lineatus, AUSTROBERYX 43
lineatus, BERYX 40
lineatus, PEMPHERIS 45
Liora annulata 92
denselineata 92
incerta na 92
lischkeana, CORALLIOPHILA 95
LIsSODENDORYX jacksoniana 298
sp. 136, 138, 145
stipitata 244
liturata, MARGINELLA itl
lobatula, ''RUNCATULINA ... 311
lobosa, CLATHRIOPSAMMA
239, 300
lockyeri, Rissoa 93, 103
loddere, MARGINELLA . 94
longicauda, CONGROMURHNA 19
Loves grandis eS
lubricatum, DENTALIUM ... 95
INDEX. 325
PAGE PAGE
LuCAPINELLA nigrita ae 92 | marguritacea, TRIGONIA ... 91
lucayanum, ASYMMETRON... 305 | margaritifer, CORYVHROICH-
THYS ce jos 48)
M MARGINELLA allporti ... 94
| altilabra Mais a 94.
Maccunnocutia labiosa 25) biplicata Bi ie od
San yas aoe sae UE | columnaria ... sas OA
macleayi, TRACHICHTHYS ... 44 flinderst ee : 94.
macrolepis, PEMPHERIS ... 45 fulgurata ... 94, 110
macropora, CLATHRIA 161, 165 | gabrieli oe ae OA
240,259 | indiscreta ... Re 94.
macropora, HCHINOCLATHRIA liturata She ee Lt
277, 284 loddere 16 ae 94.
muacropora, ECHINOCLATHRIA microscopica ... ay) a OA
(PLECTISPA ) soo AQHA | multiplicata ... son eel
macropora (var.) gigantea, ovulum oe on Om
AULENA ... soo ise | pulchella oe Sey ua
macropora (var.) gigantea, | sagittata ae roe elit:
HALME ... ace Ash) | stanislaus ... soa) EE
macropora, PLECTISPA 242,276 | SHULL Once ae soo ed
Dili. sm, BOO) | vercor. wee (OA:
macropora, WILSONELLA marmorata, NeosiLago =s- 60
299, 800 MARMORATUS, sp. ... oe 6
macropterus, CHILODACTYLUS 66 MARSIPELLA ee le =e oO
macropterus, DACTYLOSPARUS 66 Ss. ade 0 soa 018)
macropterus, MURHENICHTHYS 21 MatvrHinpa econ oH IK)
MACRORHAMPHOSUS elevalus 23 mayi, HEMIPLEUROTOMA ... 95
gallinago —... Soe eer 433 mayt, MYRTBA ae goo
scolopax a son mayi, ODOSTOMIA ... oe
sp. poe ace 1 mediolevis, TURRITELLA ... 93
Macrurus austr Abe. ae 38 mediterraneus, HOPLOSTE-
Mactra jacksoniensis ; 92 THUS Sd eA)
mactroides, Cyamiomacrra 92 megalops, ACANTHIUS sac 9
maculata, ISOSULLAGO soo (XG) megalops, SQUALUS.. 5 9
maculata, SILLAGO .. 59, 61 MEGATEBENNUS conc Ciena 92
maculatum, SCYLLIUM vse 3 melbournensis, CHTHAMALOP-
Macunsocuia labiosa sae ie TERYX ae ee eeiGs
Sp oe see oo 72 melbournensis, GERRES ... 68
MADREPORA, sp. -» 212 MELONANCHORA emphysema 142
MAGASELLA jiffwensis Boe = A Spirent Sta 4s
Sp. + : . 114 membranacea, OPHLITAS-
MAGELLANIA joubini saan PONGIA ... 215, 253
mamamillata (var.) inerustais, meridionalis, RinaicuLa 95, 112
_ CRELLA ... ee lG2 MnEsApos, sp. oA Lesine
mamiillata, PLUMOHALI- ; S = ane 92. 100
coon 155 mesodesma, CEOS Ki 92, 106
MANGELIA gatliffi ae er 94 mesodesmut, VENUS ... cols 100
hulwint seamen. 94 meyeri, CALLIOSTOMA =... 92
kingensis pe ee OA. nricra, SYRNOLA sts a BOS
spica ... ae 94 Microcionajelathrata Seen AOS)
maorianus, PLEURODON 91, 96 scubidu 142, 150, 151
”
326 ‘¢ ENDEAVOUR
PAGE
MICROCIONA, sp. 138, 145, 208
(Microctona) STYLOTEL-
LOPSIS scabida 151
microcionides, PLUMOHALI-
CHONDRIA 146
microlepis, HypSyPOPs 75
microscopica, MARGINELLA 94.
microstoma, ATHERINA 32
microstoma, THNIOMEMBRAS — 32
MicroryLoreLLa giintheri 148
Snort 142, 145
miliacea, LEDA 91
MILIOLINA, sp, 310
tricarinata aon @xK0)
mirabilis, ANEROCHALINA... 2052
Mirra retrocurvata 95
scalariformis a 95
stadialis 95, 112
tasmanica 952,
Mirromorpnua alba 94,
avicostata... ae 94.
pallidula 95
paucilirata 95
paula... 95
solida... 95
MoptIo0.a linea 91
Mopt10.uaria barbata Sep Ow
mollis, CLATHRIA 141, 207, 243
Moni.Lea oleacea 92, 161
philippensis ... a
MOonocentRIS glorta-maris 44.
montiformis, SPIRASTELLA 119
mortoni, C@LORHYNCHUS ... 38
mortoni, LABRICHTHYS aa
moseleyi, SCOLOPES... 132
mucronota, NODOSARIA Sl
miilleri, PEMPHERIS 47
multipes, CLATHRIA 300
multipes, PLECTISPA .. 204
multiplieata, MARGINELLA 94
multipora, CLATHRIA 178
multipora (var.) pawcipinus,
RHAPHIDOPHLUS
178, 184
multiradiata, PEMPHERIS
45, 47
multiradiatus, PEMPHERIS 45
munitau, HULIMA 110
MuR2NICHTHYS australis... 20
breviceps... 20
gymnotus, ... 20
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAGE
macropterus ... 21
tusmaniensis 19
murrayt, Lima 91
nurrhyna, CASSIDULINA 310
My iopatis aquila 15
australis 15
niewhofi 15
niewhofir 15
Son ese 15
Myopora albida xo
Myrrma bractea 92, 99
brazieri 99
may ue 99
MyTInicaRDIA ealyc alate 500
MyxXI“ua arborescens 148
diversiancorata 144
jacksoniana 298
pedunculata .. 144
sp. 136, 138, 145, 221
mywilloides, CLATHRIA 242
N
Nace na crebristriata 93
nana, XESTOLEBERIS 3lt
NARCINE tasmaniensis a 14
Navrica elkingtoni 94, 110
sticta... See 94
nebulosa, ZENOPSIS ... 83
nebulosus, ZEUS 83
neopilchardus, CLUPEA
(CLUPANODON) 17/
NEOSILLAGO marmorata 60
NEProngemMuSs bilineatus 36
brama 34
trevale ; Pray:
neptunt, PLUMOHALICHON-
DRIA 146
nidificata, OPHEITASPONGIA. 254
niewhofi, MYLIOBATIS 15
niewhofi, RAJA 15
niewhofii, MYLIOBATIS 15
nigra, CLATHRIODENDRON
aes 298
nigra, RASPAILIA 298
nigripinnis, CHLOROPHTHAL-
MUS 22
nigrita, LUCAPINELLA 92
nitida, RAJA... 10
nitida, RINGICULA 113
nitidus, HMMELICHTHYS 66
INDEX. 327
PAGE | PAGE
Noposaria mucronota 311 | oscitans, PHILINE ... won eh)
proxima 311 | OsrRacoDa, sp. 311
Sp. . 310) | OvToLITHUS atelodus Lae 63
nodosa, VERMICULARIA 93 ovulum, MARGINELLA Be 94.
(Nopuxvs) Rissoa pellucida 107 ovyphila, WILSONELLA = 244, 249
NONIONINA pompilioides 311 | P
umbilicatula... 311 |
NovipaNwus cinereus 2 | pallidula, MrivRoMorRPHa... 95
NOTOTHENIIDA, sp. 60 palmatus, PHysicuLus ... 38
nove-zelandiec, CyTTUS 85 papilla, OPHLITASPONGIA ... 254
nove-zelandie, ZBUS 85 | papillosa, SPIRASTRELLA 126
novapostrema, TRIPHORA 93 papyracea, PHAKELLIA 261
Nucuta beachportensis 91 PARACORDYLA lignea 25 BY
obliqua 91 Sp. ane cee 1315 132
nudipinnis, PristiopHorus 10 paradova, RASPAILIA 295
PARAMYXILLA infrequens 141
O jie eae ae LAD
PARASCYLLIUM collare ste if
obesus (var.) typicus, Rua- | ferrugineum ... he 7
PHIDOPHLUS 196 | variolatum ... ‘S 7
obliqua, NUCULA ol PARATRACHICHTHYS trailli 44.
obliquissima, CUNA... 91 partita, CLATHRIA 223, 254
obsoleta, BOLIVINA ... so DUO parvula, LIMHA ... Oil
ocellina, GIBBULA 92, 101 patagonica, Punvinunina... 311
ODOSTOMIA mayi 93 | PaTELua australis ... 109
ogilbyi, CHIMHRA Bool) calyptra 109
oleacea, MONILEFA ... 92, 101 PAYTELLINA corrugata Sulit
olearium, CYMATIUM 94. paucilirata, MivROMORPHA 95
olivacea, ALVANIA ... goa OY paucispina, 'lHALASSODEN-
olivaceus, AMPHITHALAMUS 107 DRON 202
ONOBA bassiana 108 paucispinus var. multipora,
glomerosa 108 RHAPHIDOPHLUS 178, 184
00ze, GLOBIGERINA... 309 paucispinus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS
OPHLITASPONGIA austra- 176, 195, 203, 300
liensis as aa 74shs} paucispinus, THALASSODEN-
avinelloides 188, 268, 272 DRON oe 178, 300
chalinoides 270 paula, MIrTROMORPHA sca
confragosa «ee ZOD Pecren antiaustralis soa)
inornata 264, 265 Cie Bene ob wie L0G
membranacea 215, 2538 pectinata, PHILOBRYA sone Aly od
nidificata .., .-. 204 pectiniformis, ECHINONEMA
papilla aie seey 1204: 185, 194
seriata ares .. «204 pectinoides, GLYCYMERIS ... 91
Spe ea 138, 203, 253 pedunculata, MyxILLa 144
subhispida 257, 259, 271 pellicula, CLATHRIA 208
subhispida var. vimi- pellucida, Rissoa (Noputus) 107
nalis .-. 800 naliucidus, AMPHITHALAMUS§ 107
tenuis... Bee 254, 261 PEMPHERIS affinis ... bt HO
tubulosa oe 254, 272 compressu 45, 47
OpronuRwus denticulatus 38 elongata rer geo AT
ORBULINA universa... 311 klunzingert ... pene mA,
328 ‘© ENDEAVOUR ””
PAGE
lineatus — teks 45
macrolepis ... .. 45
mitlleri me ube 47
multiradiata 45, 14.7
mulliradiatus + 47
Unwind Hes a 48
PENTACEROPSIS recwirviros-
thus... Ate abe Wl
percostata, CORBIS ... 92, 99
pergradata, CANCELLARIA,... 94
perlo, HpPrRANCHIAS 2
9
perlo, SQUALUS aoe
perranvosa (var.) incrustans,
CRELLA 58, 159
perversidens, BArHYARCA ... 91
petterdi, AMPHITHALAMUS
105, 107
petterdi, ANCILLA ... ee 93
petterdi, Rissoa soe OY
pfeifieri, 'TRIPHORA... Bt 93
PHAKELLIA flabellata sco |
papyracen 261
ventilabrume ... So
PHENACOLEPAS calva et 193
PHILINE columnarius noc. ON
oscitans se eo OS
philippensis, MONILEA so OH
philippi, CENTRACION 63 2
philippi, HETERODONTUS ... 2
philippi, SQUALUS ; 2
phillipi, CORYTHROICHTHYS 26
phillipi, SYNGNATHUS ates 26
PHILOBRYA fimbriata ioe SOL
pectinata ... Boo wl
PHOLADOMYA arenosa fee will
Puysicuuus barbatus gop
palmatus ... 535)» ahs}
Sp. Ae Hes to 1
piniformis, CLATHRIA .. 241
PISANIA schoutanica re 95
pistachia, ARCA oor 91
platei var. australis, CALLAN-
THIAS he on. Oil
platei, CALLANTHIAS seen” AOU
platei, CLIONOPSIS ... ee li22
platessa, CARANX ... sasSts«)
PLECTISPA arborea 208, 280, 300
(PLecTIsPA) CLATHRIA
arborea 204, 280
ECHINOCLATHRIA
macropord... . 204
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAGE
PuEcTIsPa elegans 208, 280, 300
macropora 208, 242, 276,
277, 281, 300
multipes : 204
Sp. wee 3 Sop . 21083
PLECTROPOMA susuki Bee tS)
plena, PLOCAMIA . 144
PLEURODON maorianus 91, 96
PLEUROSTOMELLA alternans 310
plewrotenia, ANTHIAS seg 0)
plicata, ALLANTOPHORA 276
plicilaminatus, TROPHON ... 95
PLOCAMIA aes 145
plena ... .. 144
SiO ae eyes 144, 145, 146
PLOCAMIOPSIS, sp. 145
PLUMOHALICHONDRIA
arenacea 160
australis 165, 160
cespitosa 149
gravida 139
ucrustans 152
mammillata sce» GS)
microcionides 146
neptunt Wat ... 146
Sp. a 138, 142, 146
POCILLON, sp. 136, 145
poculoides, SPIRAS'TELLA 122
Pouinices beddonei Ve 94.
polychotoma, CHALINA 252
PoLyMASTIA craticia ace = 29
(PomoLosus) CLupHa bassensis 16
pompilioides, NONIONINA 311
POROLEDA ensicula... oc Oil
poresa, SERIOLELLA Se 8h
porphyria, IMBRICARIA .... 95
PRIONACE glauca... ne 9
PRIOPIS ransayi... eo
PRISTIOPHORUS cirratus ... 9
nudipinnis nae oe LO
PRISTIS cirratus ... 9
probleema, CRASSATELLITES- Ol
producta, CRASSATELLITES... 91
producta, KritHE 310,311
PRONUCULA decorosa foaet soil
PROSOPLISMUS recurvirostris 72
prowima, NoposaRta BLL
prowimus (var.) typicus, RHa-
PHIDOPHLUS 185, 190
PSAMMOPEMMA crassum 287
PSEUDOAMBASSIS ramsayi ... 57
PAGH
PSEUDOCLATHRIA compressa 245
Sp. 142, 143, 146
PsHUDOLABRUS cyanogenys 76
psittaculus 77
vestitus Ul
PsEUDOPHYCIS bar batus 38
breviusculus ... 38
psittacula, LABRICHTHYS 77
psittacula, Laprus (‘lauroaa) 77
psittaculus, LABRUS 717
psittaculus, PSEUDOLABRUS Ud
pulchella, MARGINELLA Tali
pulchella, Rissoa 107
pulchellum, CARDIUM 92
pulchellus, ANTHIAS 50
pulchra, SCHISMOPE > 6
PULLENIA spheroides ee woul
pulvillus, AMPHITHALAMUS — 107
pulvillus, Risso soa. LO zy
PULVINULINA canariensis... 3811
crassa 311
extgua 311
patagonica Soo Selal
Spe wei. 809, 310
tr wncatulinoides 311
PULVINULINA, sp. 809
pumila, CLATHRISSA 146, 168, 298
pumila, ECHINONEMA 168
pumila (var.) iierustans,
CRELLA 153, 168, 298
pumila (var.) rubra, CLATH-
RISSA 170, 298
pumila (var.) rubra, CRELLA 169
punctata, [ISOSILLAGO 59
punctata, SERIOLELLA 36
punctata, SILLAGO ce 160
punctatus, GASTEROSTEUS... 36
PuNCrURELLA corolla 101
demissa i 92, 101
Fumariun 92, 100, 101
galerita 101
harrissont 101
hemipsila 101
kesteveni a 101
pupoides, GUADRYINA 310
purpurea, Rissoa 108
purpurissatus, AULOPUS 22
pygmea, BOLIVINA... 310
pygmea, UVIGERINA S09 alll
pyramida, CLATHRIA 239, 299
pyramida, WILSONELLA ,,, 299
INDEX.
329
PAGE
pyramidata, CLio 95
pyramidatus, AMPHITHALA-
MUS ree 93, 107
pyramidatus, SCROBS 107
PYRENE atkinsoni 95
aviaerata 95
beachportensis 95
calva ... 95
jauffaensis 95
PYVHEAS, sp, 152
Q
quadrata, 'TURRITELLA 93
quadricostulata, LAGENA 311
quoyi, CARDITA 97
R
racuti, CARDITA 98
radiatus, CHLAMYS... 96
Rata australis 10
Rasa aquila... 15
australis 10
cruciatus 14
niewhofi 15
nitida 10
waitir 12
ramosa (var.) anchoratum,
ECHINONEMA 298
ramosa, HCHINOCLATHRIA 204,
252, 277, 280, 285, 300
ranosa, RASPAILIA... 144
ranvosa, WILSONELLA 298
ramsayi, AMBASSIS ... 57
ramsayi, CHANDA 58
ramsayi, PRIOPIS 57
ramsayi, PseUDOAMBASBIS.. 57
yaoull, CARDITA nae 98
raphanus, 'UECHNITELLA 809, 310
rasor, ANTHIAS 53
rasor, CHSIOPERGA ... a 50
rasov, SERRANUS... Sr 53
RASPAILIA nigra 298
paradoxa 295
ranvosa, 144
Sp. 139, 144, 295
tenwis 144
recurvatus, TROPHON 95
recurvirostris, Hisrioprerus 71
recurvirostris, PENTACEROPSIS 71
recurvirostiis, PROSOPLIMUS 72
336 ‘¢ ENDEAVOUR ”
PAGE
regina, 'TRIPHORA ... aoe 93
REopHAX dentaliniformis ... 310
fusiformis ... sco ult)
sp. n06 --. 309
retiarium, CALLIOSTOMA ... 92
reticulata, CLATHRIOPSAMMA
177, 300
reticulata, ECHINOCHALINA
287, 289
reticulatus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS
176, 300
retrocurvata, Mirra ae 95
retusus, ACTAEON ... sists 95
RHAPHIDOPHLUS bispinosus
177, 215
cervicormis ... perma LT,
(RHAPHIDOPHLUS) CLATHRIA
spiculosa ... sacameliie
RHAPHIDOPHLUS corallio-
philus 2p S05 Wei
cratitius Wits Sia
erectus a Ba rath
TOP oor Weftie, itty
filifer, var. spinifera 187
paucispnus 176, 178, 195,
203, 300
paucispinus, var. mul-
tipora set poe db eaSs
paucispinus, var. mul-
tiporus ... bee SA
reticulatus 176, 300
ridleyt Se sco Lltsi7/
seriatus sok wader eal,
Spo ener 145, 175, 205
spinifer ser Beonan ect
topsenti ad a escesee LNTAL
ty pica ied eee arcs
typicus oe Foeme Lihat
184, 185
typicus, var. anchor-
atus 185, 194, 196
typicus, var. brevis-
pinus 185, 198, 300
typicus, var. favosus
186, 201
typicus. var. geminus
185, 191
typicus, var. obesus
186, 196
typicus, var. provimus
185, 190
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
PAGE
typicus, var. stellifer
186, 199, 235
RHINA squatina —... en) PALO
RHIZAMMINA indivisa Sea) BLO)
rhomboidea, VERTICORDIA... 97
rhyllensis, RISSOINA ewe
RICHARDSONIA insignis... 72
sp. Bae 500 coo 72
ridleyi, EcH1iNopicryumM 141, 151
ridleyi, RHAPHIDOPHLUS ... 187
RINGICULA australis see LS
delecta ae see lds
meridionalis ... 95, 112
nitida aise we, elas
semrmsculpla ... 95, 118
Rissoa annulata ... =. 06
aupprowima ... - 05
badia sats Sons Oe
beddomet ast 25, VLOG
bicolor ae _eelOG
(CINGULA) rubicunda 107
columnaria ... oe LOG
cyclostoma ... 106, 108
diemenensis ... foo, Ale
dubitabilis ... ee LOG
filosa ... oe yoo LOS
flania see “3% LOG
flammea a LOG
frauenfeldi ... aoe LOG
frenchiensis ... 06
hulliana sce 93, 103
inbrex ae soo IOS
incompleta ... inp OB
lockyeri a 93, 103
(NopuLus) pellucida 107
petterdi Ae me LOT
pulchella ae pace LO
pulvillus miele eee LOM
purpurea... ee LOS
(Scross) badia sco ORE
(Scross) scrobiculator 108
sophie 300 fe LOG
sp. ae sate ... 104
verconiand ... 93, 104
woodsi Ba ee OS8
RIssoina flindersii ... LOG
gertrudis ae stn 98
kershawi re son Oe
rhyllensis ... Bore ete
tasmanica ... ih ee
tumida ee: aLOd
INDEX. 331
PAGE PAGE
robusta, SILLAGO ... =e » 60 ScHuETrTEHA scalaripinnis 80, 81
robustus, SOLEGNATHUS.... 28 Sie ance te BL
rosea, LEPTOTHYRA... Pe a Oe SCISSURELLA pishrolin soe ee
rosulenta, CARDITA ... aoe 97 SCOLECENCHELYS, sp, us 21
rosulenta, VENERICARDIA 92, 97 scolopax, CENTRISCUS 24
RovaLia soldanii... sop GLA scolopax, MacrorHAaMPHosu s 23
rotunda, ECHINOCLATHRIA 282 SCOLOPES moseley? ... son JG
rubens, CLATHRIA 179, 203, 218, Spe) se: ae eo ay
224, 299 SCOMBER atwun at Shas 80
rubens var. dura, THALASSO- japonicus... 80
DENDRON 178, 202, SCOMBRESOX forsteri 5a 30
218, 299 scrobiculator, AMPHITHALA-
rubens var. lamella, THALAS- MUS ... en Oo 1Os
SODENDRON 178, 218, 300 scrobiculator, Rissoa (Scross) 108
rubens var. lamellosa, THAL- Scross pyramidatus see LOW
ASSODENDRON.....__ 178 (Scross) Rissoa badia .... 107
rubens, THALASSODENDRON 218 (Scross) Rissoa serobicu-
rubicunda, LABRICHTHYS ... 717 lator ~ eo OS
rubicunda, Rissoa (CINGULA) 107 SPs —: oo LOS
rubicundus, AMPHITHALAMUS 107 ScyYLIORHINUS Bennie 3
rubra, HCHINONEMA 161, 164, 299 sp. 3
rubra, GLOBIGERINA soo ola vincents 4.
rubra (var.) incrustans, ScyLiium anale 3
CRELLA 1538, 170, 298 laticeps 6
rubra (var.) pumila, CLATH- maculatunr 3
RISSA 170, 298 vincenti 4.
rubra (var.) pumila, CRELLA 169 segmentatus, 'TROPHON 95
rufus, CHILOBRANCHUS ... 18 semicincta, GILBERTIA 50
semicinctau, HyPOPLECTRODES 50
S semiradiatus, CORIARIUS 92
semisculpta, RINGIcULA 95, 118
SABANHA flammeu ... ae LOG septemfasciatus, HPINEPHELUS 49
incidata 30e LOT seriata, OPHLITASPONGIA ... 254
sabella, CEPHALOSCYLLIUM 6 seriatus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS... 177
sagittata, MARGINELLA ... 111 SERIOLELLA bilineata see
sajaz, CLUPHA ae Heer ly bramu aac Saks, tae
salebrosa, ALVANIA.. soo U@s} dobula oe pee PST
salebrosus, AMPHITHALAMUS 108 porosa se eh oi
sawed, DRILLIA wis ne OM punctata oF SSO
SAXICAVA arctica ... se 92 Sp. se Pe ae 1
scabida, MicRocIona 142, 150 trevale ae oa
seabida, STYLOTELLOPSIS SERRANUS raso7r ‘ sae 53
(Microciona) ... 151 setigera, XESTOLEBERIS ... 311
scabrocuneata, CYTHERE ... 311 setosa, VERTICORDIA 91, 97
scalariformis, Mirra ae | 95 sexlineatus, HOLoTES ce OO
scalaripiinis, SCHUBTTA 80, 81 sexlineatus, TERAPON ce 66
scupha, ARCOPERNA aie OL SIGMOILINA schlumbergeri... 310
SCHISMOPE atkinsoni on Oe, sihama, SILLAGO ,,.. aoe 60
pulchra aa 5. silea, KALYKENTERON Ban 2 defill
schlunbergeri, Si@Mo1LINA 310 SILLAGO bussensis 60, 61, 62
schoutanica, PISANIA 05 bostockii ae 60, 63
332 ‘‘ PNDEAVOUR ”
PAGE
burrus 23 noo OY
ciliata OO G1 GZ
gracilis : 60, 62
maculata PHe 59, 61
punctata Hes san SO)
robusta Boe Boe K0L)
sihama su son ——«(830)
Sp. a0 nine ane 59
terrm@-regine... 5
SIPHONOCHINA bispic eae 275
smithiana, TURRITELLA ... 938
soldanti, ROTALIA ... soa LIL
SOLEGNATHUS fasciatus 27, 28
hardwickiu... soo nes)
robustus sats ba 28
spinosissimus 27, 28
SOLETELLINA hedleyr son
solida, MITROMORPHA sen
sophie, Rissoa ne eeELOG
SPANIOPLON, sp... .. = 145
speculiger, CYPSILURUS ... 30
speculiger, Hxoc@7rus eS)
speculiger, EXONAUTES ... 30
spheroides, PULLENIA ong til
SPHM#RORDINA bulloides... 31]
SPHYRNA lewini.... 2 9
spica, MANGILIA.... one oe
spica, TRIPHORA ... 93
spictata, CLATHRIA 210, 215, 226,
229
spiculosa, CLATHRIA (RHA-
PHIDOPHLUS) ... 177
spinifera (var.) filifer, RuapH-
IDOPHLUS ... sso Listy
spinifer, RHAPHIDOPHLUS... 177
spinosissimus, SOLEGNATHUS 27,
28
spinosissinus, SOLENOGNA-
THUS eee 27
SPIRASTRELLA aleyonioides
124, 241
montiformis ... aso LI,
papillosa —... son WAG
poculoides... jan 12}
SI verre oe jag LE)
tentorioides ... soa PS
vagabunda ... se 122
spongiosum, ECHINODICTYUM
142, 151
sprattus, CLUPEA ... fee uAlG
squatina, KHINA ... aco |= LO
SCIENTIFIC RESULTS.
squatina, SQUALUS
SQUATINA squatina...
SQUALUS cinereus
glaweus
isabella
perlo
philippi
megalops
squatina
stadialis Mirra E
stanislaws, MARGINELLA
927
ONNDOW <
10
112
94.
stellifer (var.) typicus, RHAPH-
IDOPHLUS
sticta, NATICA :
stilla, MARGINELLA...
186, 199, 235
94.
94.
STIPHONOCHALINA bispiculata 255
stipitata, LissENDENDORYX 244
striata, CLATHRIA 211
striatissima, CHIONE apo,
STYLOSTICHON conulosum... 148
ins. 08s 188, 141, 145
STYLOTELLOPSIS amabilis... 151
(Microciona) eae 151
sp. , 146, 150
subdiluta, TELLINA.. x 92
SUBEROTELITES, sp. 146, 208
subfusca, BARLEEIA oe ls}
subfuscus, AMPHITHALAMUS 108
subhispida, ECHINOCLATHRIA 257
subhispida, OPHLITASPONGIA
257, 259, 271
subhispida var. viminalis,
OPHLITASPONGIA 3800
superba, HMARGINULA 92
superstes, CONUS 94, 111
susuki, PLECTROPOMA 49
symbiotica, AXINELLA 237
SYNAGROPS, sp. 55
SYNGNATHUS intestinalis 26
phillipi 26
SYRINGELLA, sp. 145
SYRNOLA micra 93
ay
'THNIOMEMBRAS microstoma 32
sp. ae 32
tasmanica, COCCULINA 93
tasmanica, HuLIMA 108
tasmanica, KRAUSSINA cee oh
tasmanica, Mirra ... 95, 112
tasmanica, RisSOINA
: ts Hee
oa
sft
ht
oh
tetera ste
fat
se
beh
tite
tehiele:
vie >
c ‘2
pis <8 267s a)
Nubieha dy bysady Muda tte)
Pyke
hy Betty on
reve!
itie
’
i
feat
+1
etat
f
*,
t
‘3
be
3.
>
43
}
f
ate? at eye
epee
sts
th
Otte
4
© ee e8
et
Mb fe ie ty
te — ee tee ry
See
+.
6
+
om
)
7
-*
eee
0h i he
Tea
alate?
Meter tis
i* * ‘ '
atte
leletett
i Tee
*
at
Tete i
T.
¥?
tit
-
4
ae
sists
>
>
-)
:
t
;
Pies
+
t
> t
“:
ze
2
s
a
ht le ene
,
.
.
.
‘