. : tS + 4°45" spre pebebeoeaear) ’ eres eit yaa be peagh ro 7) ai 4° a ; other hts 4 1tie j 4 . Pye trate 4 "i? + i vert i : ~ 4d ‘ [ i OO err rare APE Cot ‘ : : ere UL ern ot 7 : 7 é PRP AARNE aiicealttintteprnntnitanaaninn tannins Ramana E NN ay ia : see yt eye fy a] weed eee + : } - ; ; ae ‘ = — ; is +33 z *; i * ; cot ot ee ee i satel a Steeles , : : ee, i is fs o eee : j : ; ’ 7 44 It) it é a3 bere bred sad i'bs ee ' + 44° brhreiers ; Derr Hits Srhat on oot he) . aj 58 448 : , tts Pe oe) Sot ot bebe) Ort oe oe oe: Cots ; CSU Pt bene rt be bt be be ear ast OS, aig a i" : 5 j +3 . Hae aa)4 ties isis < + : “i + agetas ete : tie . ai : : oy yy : wis “i +3 : ‘ if ory ‘ ve + ber aye ede me ; a4 . 43058 4 oo sri 444 e ot he | +4") + G58 roe , + i : ié : Mi ‘ 4 48 as ht aeiery “1 N s apes me) ‘ a4) 4 a ee * ‘ of i a8 + 4 e + « a e &- 4 44 uy i 53 ay 3b bey ‘ a “ + ‘ St ts ~~ * ~~ ene e+ h h@2TSoOoO TOEO O MMA A 1IOHM/198W Commonwealth of Australia. DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND CUSTOMS. Heel colteltenka tele: Reo Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by F.I.S. “Endeavour” 1909-10 under H. C. DanNnevie, Commonwealth Director of Fisheries. VOLUME-T PUBLISHED BY DIRECTION OF THE MINISTERS FOR TRADE AND Customs, Hon. FRANK GWYNNE TUDOR AND Hon. LITTLETON E. GRoOomM. SYDNEY, 1911-1914. & Tv - r « « os = a = . 4 ew ‘ 4 = . i i CONTENTS. PART I.—PusuiisuEp 22ND Dxecemeper, 1911. Page Plates Report on the Fishes obtained by the F.I.8. ‘‘ Endeav- our’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Tasmania. Partl. By Allan R. McCulloch ... ae oe 5s 385 ie 1 L.-XVI. Report on the Mollusca obtained by the F. I. 8. ‘‘En- deavour’’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia. Part 1. By Charles Hedley ... bs st wis 90 XVII.- , XX. PART IJ.—PuBuisHEep 9TH JuLy, 1912. Report on the Sponges obtained by the F.1I. 8. ‘*En- deavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tas- mania. Partl. By. E.F.Hallmann _... sso AUN DO PART IIJ.—PusuisHep 29TH Aucust, 1912. A new Species of Asymmetron from the Great Austra- lian Bight, South Australia. By Janet W. Raff... 304 XXXVII. Report on a sample of Globigerina Ooze from 1122 fathoms, East of Tasmania. By F.Chapman ... 309 PART IV.—PusuisHEep 47TH Juty, 1914. Title Page, Contents, and Index. EIST SOR SHE CONTRIBUTORS: With References and Catalogue Numbers. Chapman, F.— 59.512 (26.5: 94.6). Report on a Sample of Globigerina Ooze from 1122 fathoms, East of Tasmania. Zool. Res. End., i., 3, 1912. Hallmann, E. F.— 59.54 (26.5: 94.2-5). Report on the Sponges obtained by the F. I. 8. ‘‘ Endeavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland, and 'l'asmania. Part 1. Zool. Res. End. 1., 2, 1912, Hedley, Charles— 59.4 (26.5: 94.2). teport on the Mollusca obtained by the F. I. S. ‘* Endeavour’’ chiefly off Cape Wiles, South Australia. Part 1. Zool. Res. End. i., 1, 1911. McCulloch, Allan R.— 59.7 (26.5: 94.2-6). Report on the Fishes obtained by the F. I. 8. ‘‘ Endeavour’’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, and Tasmania. Part 1. Zool. Res. End., v., 1, 1911, Raff, Janet W.— 59.71 (26.5: 94.2), A New Species of Asymmetron from the Great Australian Bight. Zool. Res. End., 1., 3, 1912. ‘snoumuolp—, ATWO[ ol, pod URID0 Atoyy UT dodf OYZ PUL BULTPLS oy} oto LOY] ‘Ajoy guq ‘poydeuun yods VW ROS UOT ‘OUOT 944 UO ST o1OTLY, ,. Sn Memoriam “Had I been any god of power, I would Have sunk the sea within the earth or ere It should the good ship so have swallowd and The fraughting souls within her.”—The Tempest. H. C. DANNEVIG, DIREcTOoR ; G. W. C. PIM, Masrsr ; C. T. HARRISSON, Browoeist ; And eighteen others, comprising the crew of the F.LS. ‘‘ Endeavour,’ who were lost at sea December, 1914. The pages of this Part are numbered in Roman numerals to enable the reader to insert the letterpress in any position in Vol. ILI. he may think fit. HARALD CHRISTIAN DANNEVIG, DIRECTOR, and the Work and Loss of the BsS. 7 Endeavour.” “There dwells a wife by the Northern Gate, And a wealthy wife is she ; She breeds a breed 0’ rovin’ men And casts them oversea.”—Kipling. On 20th November, 1914, the Fisheries Investigation ship left Hobart for Macquarie Island. She arrived there on Ist December, and, after a delay of two days occasioned by bad weather. fulfilled her mission of relieving an operator at the Wireless Station. She started on her return journey on 3rd December. A brief view by the solitary officers stationed at the island of the staunch little ship as she disappeared into the sea mists, a terrific gale two days later, and that, perhaps, is all we shall ever know of the end of our friend, Harald Dannevig, who, in his knowledge of the mysteries of the sea knew no superior ; of Captain Pim, a capable navigator, whose pre- vious career in tropical seas knew every resource of defence from storm or danger; and of a good and true ship’s company. The sea has taken toll, and the ** Endeavour’s ”’ work is finished. In years to come that work will be appreciated at its proper value. No more capable man could have been chosen to direct it than Harald Christian Dannevig, who combined a knowledge of the habits and of the life of fish, acquired from childhood, with the enthusiasm of one who loved his profession and lived almost solely for it. Out in all weather, in storm and sunshine, when he could have readily directed the work from a comfortable office on shore, his one thought and ambition was to succeed in bringing home to the many doubting minds in Australia that there is a rich reserve of food supply in the fisheries of our coast, simply waiting to be harvested. From the coast of Queensland to those of Western Australia a great portion of the sea-bed has been explored, and extensive areas suitable for trawling and rich in food fishes have been surveyed and charted. There is no monopoly of the sea- bed; there are no fences. It waits for enterprise and industry ; and with care and reasonably good management must yield profit to the harvester and, what is of greater Iv. concern to our people, a certain and abundant cheap supply of fish food. That was the objective of the *‘ Endeavour’s ” work during the brief period of her existence—less than six years—and the foundations have been laid for what in time will prove to be a flourishing and permanent industry. Harald Christian Dannevig was born at ‘‘ Flodevig Hiso,”’ an island owned by his father, on one of the fiords of Norway, near Arendal. His father, Gunnar Mathias Dannevig, was the first to introduce fish culture into Norway, and the Norwegian Government established the first fish hatchery on his island. Harald Dannevig was thirteen years old at the time, and he thus became familiar with the work from childhood. He studied at the Christiania University under the eminent Professor G. O. Sars, and chose those subjects most likely to be of practical value in the work of fish culture and acclimatisation. In 1894 he was selected by the Fisheries Board of Scotland to supervise the completion of the Marine Hatcheries at Dunbar, and later on he selected the new site at Aberdeen, designed the new plant, and constructed the tidal spawning pond. In 1895 he was consulted by the Lancashire Fisheries Board, and again designed the necessary plant, and in the same year visited Italy for a similar purpose at the invitation of the authorities. Still engaged in the service of the Fisheries Board of Scotland, he spent a considerable portion of his time at sea on fishing vessels and trawlers, investigating the various methods of capture and the habits of fish life. In 1902 the Agent-General for New South Wales was requested to consult the best authorities and obtain, as far as possible, the most competent fisheries expert available. Harald Dannevig was recommended and appointed. On his journey to Australia Mr. Dannevig conducted, with unqualified success, an experiment which until then was unexampled. He fitted in the between decks of an Orient mail steamer two tanks in which he succeeded in bringing to Sydney from England several hundred live adult plaice, turbot, and other fish. Hesecured sufficient fish food before leaving, which he kept in the freezing room ofthe ship. Sleeping alongside the tanks he regulated, as far as practicable, the temperature, and kept his charges under continual obser- vation. On arrival in Sydney the fish ponds provided were found to be ill-constructed and unsuitable; a heat wave occurred soon afterwards, and it became necessary to release the fish in the deeper and freer waters of the sea. That incident was characteristic of the man—patient and thorough, with only one thought, his work, V. He designed and constructed the Fish Hatchery at Gunna- matta Bay, Port Hacking, New South Wales. In 1906 he sueceeded in transferring from Hobart to the Hatchery 2.000 adult flounders, from which he hatched and liberated 20,000,000 fry. He conducted a later similar experiment with greater results. Amongst the more important original works which, in addition to his work on the ‘“ Endeavour,” will prove an enduring record of his valuable services, may be mentioned investigation in regard to the reproduction of food fishes ; where fish eggs are deposited; the natural dangers and troubles of fish life ; periodicity in the abundance of fish and its causes (a paper on which he read before the Royal Society) ; fresh water fish culture in New South Wales ; the habits and migrations of the Mullet ; the life history of the Cray Fish, together with many Bther interesting a useful features associated with the history of fish life. Harald Dannevig was an interesting man personally, as well as in regard to his particular work. Kind hearted, of splendid physique, he will be sadly missed by those who knew him. To the Government he has rendered good service. There was no necessity for him to visit Macquarie Island. The vessel was engaged in work apart from her ordinary responsibilities. He was, however, above all, a courageous man. Scenting danger, he thought his proper place was with his crew on board the ship. He went and died in what he conceived to be the performance of his duty. He leaves, mourning, a widow, a daughter of sixteen, and a son of five years of age. Captain George Pim was in command of the “ Endeavour ” from 9th October, 1911, and she never had a more capable master. He had held a command since he was 22 years of age without an accident of any kind. He had considerable experience of the Pearl Shell and Beche-de-mer Fisheries in Torres Straits and Northern Australia, and for some time had sole charge of a number of vessels engaged in the pearling industry. He was a member of the Scientific Expedition to New Guinea in 1905 of Major Cooke Daniels, who wrote :— ““T count myself lucky to have found so good a skipper. Your loyalty to my interests, which were those of the whole expedition, and your enthusiasm of helpfulness, earned the reward of a very great deal of work. ‘Topography, Hydro- graphy, Technology and general Ethnography, you did them all more than well. So on the side of actual work you did not only all you ought to have done as the master of the “ Kori,” but all you could do as a man of many capabilities vi. in many directions.’’ High but deserved praise for a quiet, modest, capable man; and it is comforting to know, what- ever happened to the “‘ Endeavour ” two good men were in charge, and no accident which could possibly have been avoided by those on board contributed to the disaster. Some unforeseen disaster overwhelmed the ship and her crew. Captain Pim has left a widow to mourn her sad loss. There are sorrowing hearts for others who were on board the “‘ Endeavour,” and these equally claim our sympathy for their loss, and a kindly memory for those for whom they orieve. The names of those on board were :— Director of Fisheries... .. Harald Christian Dannevig Master .. ve — .. George William Charles Pim Mate - .. wt a .. Joseph Reynoldson Burkitt Biologist H ie .. Charles Turnbull Harrisson Second Mate & Chief Fisherman Alfred Ackers Fisherman ve a .. Herbert A. Farrant ss aw: Fi .. L. Olsen My ae oi .. George Cooper 43 sae Harold E. Samson Chief Hngineer a .. Angus Ross Mackay Second *) a .. Stanley Ditcham Third 55 gh .. Richard Charles Hoe Fireman Pe Bu .. Alfred Holmes Nils Rasmussen ) + att a .. J. Byrne Ordinary Seaman oe .. Thomas Rice -; Yi is wat eo W.., Jackson: Chief Cook and Steward .. A. Wythe Assistant Cook a .. Harry Kitching Messroom Boy st .. Thomas Scott Clerk, Meteorological Bureau Harold Power. They now rest in the depths of the sea, the mysteries of which they had been seeking to understand. May they rest in peace ! N. LOCKYER. GEORGE WILLIAM CHARLES PIM, MASTER MARINER. * And now the storm-blast came, and he Was tyrannous and. strong : He struck with his o’er taking wings, And chased us south along.’ °—Coleridge. CapTraiIn G. W. C. Prov was born at Gloucester, England, on 9th March, 1866, the son of Mr. John Robert Pim, a gentle- man of means. He came of a well-known nautical family, the eldest son in every instance having been in the Royal Navy, a practice extending backwards for upwards of two hundred years. The subject of this notice was the first who, although he had been entered as a Naval cadet. was in conse- quence of unforeseen causes unable to continue a naval career. The family of Pim, or Pym, as originally written, has left its mark in British history. There is reason to believe that Captain Pim is a lineally descended kinsman of the celebrated English parliamentarian, John Pym, who, with John Hampden, equally eminent in the same direction, was one of the ‘five members ” impeached by Charles I. in 1642. The name appears to have originally been Pym, but in the reign of James I. some of the younger and gayer members, it is said, became courtiers, but this step not meeting with the approbation of the older Quakers, the latter expressed their resentment by changing the family name to Pim. The name is well known in naval history. From 1798 to 1810 one Lieutenant Samuel Pym (subsequently Captain and finally Admiral Sir Samuel Pym) did great service in the Anglo-French naval fights in the West Indies. His most important commands appear to have been the 74-gun ship ** Atlas,” and the frigate ‘“‘ Sirius.”’ In recent years the best known naval member of the family was Admiral Bedford Clapperton Pim (grand-uncle to Captain Pim), who was born at Bideford in Devonshire in 1826. He took part, amongst other achievements, in the Franklin Search Expedition to the Arctic regions under Sir EK. Belcher, in 1852. After severing his connection with the naval training ship, George Pim, to use a colloquial phrase, “went to sea ”’ about 1881, serving in various capacities in at least three sea-going vessels agi 1886, when, being then in Queensland, he ente1 ed the Lighthouse service and was attached to the Proudtoot Lightship on the Proudfoot Shoal, Torres Strait. After some vill. months of this monotonous life Pim transferred to the Moreton Bay Pilot service. Henceforth tired of subordinate positions, he struck out for himself, and either alone or in partnership occupied himself for some years in “‘ sandalwood getting’ on the Queensland coast; then migrating to Thursday Island he entered the ‘‘ beche-de-mer ”’ trade, and to some slight extent that of ‘pearl shelling’ also. He successively owned, or part owned (it is uncertain which), and commanded, when not more than twenty-three years of age, in 1888 the ‘“ Violet,’ a cutter of nine tons; in 1889, the * Alice ” and the “ P.C.E.” respectively, a lugger of ten and a cutter of nineteen tons ; and finally the ‘‘ Whaup,” a ketch of thirty-four tons. In this last venture Captain Pim was in partnership with a Mr. Luff, of Thursday Island. In these several voyages the subject of our notice made money, which was spent in scientific research in New Guinea and North Queensland. Towards the end of 1903 Mr. Pim was in Sydney with the view of obtaining a certificate ; he passed as “‘only mate” for fore-and-aft vessels on 11th February, 1904. Towards the end of 1903 there arrived in Sydney Major W. Cooke Daniels, of the United States Army, who had been Adjutant-General of Division in the Cuban campaign, accom- panied by certain scientific friends. It was his purpose to rarry out anthropological and ethnological researches in South- east New Guinea. For this purpose a schooner-yacht of 67 tons, called the “ Kori,” with auxiliary steam power and a sea-going steam launch was brought from England. Mr. Pim was appointed master, and the expedition left Sydney in April, 1904. During the cruise he did excellent work by surveying and charting Tokunu, or Alcester Island, in the Trobriand Group, and Gawa Island, in the Marshall Bennett Group. He also furnished a description of Kwaiawata Island, in the same group, and this, with the above charts, appeared in the “* Geographical Journal ” for April, 1906, as portion of a paper by Drs.C. G. Saligmann and W. M. Strong, members of the expedition, the former of whom expressed his thanks to Captain Pim for the latter’s excellent services. After navigating the “Kori” to Singapore on the break up of the expedition Mr. Pim, in 1906, became con- nected for a time with the Celebes Trading Company at the Aru Islands. Mr. Pim was appointed master of the ‘* Endeavour ”’ on the 9th October, 1911, and so remained until disaster brought about the untimely death of himself and companions, some- where between Macquarie Island and either New Zealand or Tasmania. rb He is described as an indefatigable worker, a careful navi- gator, and ever on the watch for trouble when the “Endea- vour ’ was at work. The nature of her investigations called for much marine surveying and hydrographic work for the charting of rocks and other irregularities ; these duties had often to be carried out by Captain Pim under the most trying circumstances. The investigation of new areas called for unremitting care and attention, and he was to be seen in all parts of the ship watching the trawl-warps and controlling the soundings, etc., whilst at the same time keeping a sharp eye on the navigation. When Mr. Dannevig was not on board the whole responsibility of the trawling operations and scientific work fell wpon Captain Pim’s shoulders. The difficulties of working with comparatively so small a vessel in exposed areas made his task a very difficult one. He was a keen collector, with a sharp eye for anything unusual, and many interesting and new organisms in the “ Endeavour’s * collections were personally secured and preserved by him. Whilst master of the ‘“‘ Endeavour ” Captain Pim, in 1913, conveyed Captain Brewis, R.N., who was engaged in re- porting upon the lighthouses around Australia, from Fre- mantle to Busselton in Western Australia. Captain Pim was a man of indomitable resolution, keen and persevering in his professional duties, quiet and rather reserved in demeanour, but, beneath all, of a kind and sym- pathetic nature. His end, and those of his companions, was, alas, only another exemplification of the fate of many “ that go down to the sea in ships—that do business in great waters.” R. ETHERIDGE. CHARLES TURNBULL HARRISSON, BIOLOGIST. “We bring no store of ingots, Of spice or precious stones, But that we have we gathered With sweat and aching bones.’’—Kipling. THE zoological knowledge of Charles T. Harrisson was gathered not in a laboratory nor from lectures, but under the open sky, from beach, mountain and forest. This type of pioneer, to whom Biology owes so much, seems more and more rarely bred under modern conditions. Yet there is work to be done on the frontiers of science that none do so well as that self-taught, self-reliant, keen free-lance the field naturalist. He belonged to a family long settled in Tasmania, which, like the Atkinsons and the Hulls, were mostly naturalists, and to whom such scientific leaders of the last generation as Tate and Tenison Woods expressed their indebtedness. Charles was the eldest son of Frank Harrisson, who had an extensive orchard on the Brown River Road, south of Hobart, and for some years was a near neighbour of Lieut. C. EK. Beddome, the well-known Conchologist. The second son, Ernest Harrisson, was also a keen and successful collector. The brothers were smart yachtsmen, and explored with the dredge a wide area of the Derwent Estuary and D’Entrecasteaux Channel. As far back as 1882, Beddome dedicated Cemort harrissoni and Alexia harrissoni to Mr. Charles Harrisson “‘ one of my fellow workers.” Ornithology was one of the first subjects to interest him, and he formed a large collection of Tasmanian birds and their eggs. On the death of the parents, the home broke up, and Harrisson tried various occupations without much success. For a time he had a dairy farm at Long Bay. Then he set up a studio in Melbourne, but though a clever artist, with especial ability in landscapes, he failed to obtain sufficient recognition. A small post in the Government service at Hobart was then offered him, in which position he lived pleasantly for several years, and during the tenure of which he married and had ason. The local Scientific Society found in him a zealous and active member. With success he entered on the study of Tasmanian Crustacea. So that when Sir Douglas Xl. Mawson required a good all-round collector for his Antarctic expedition, the services of Mr. Harrisson were recommended, and he was enrolled. The position of Naturalist to the Western Party, under Mr. F. Wild, was allotted to him. Opportunities for zoological collecting were scarce, but what could be done was done. Ever cheerful, ever helpful, he was a comrade whose energy and good temper were proof against starvation and such miseries as Antarctic explorers endure. In the ‘““ Home of the Blizzard,’ Wild writes, “‘ many of the gusts must have exceeded one hundred miles per hour, since one of them lifted Harrisson, who was standing beside me, clean over my head and threw him nearly twenty feet.” A number of Harrisson’s coloured drawings of Antarctic scenery embellish Mawson’s book. A shipmate on the “ Aurora ” (Mr. J. H. Collinson Close) has supplied the following information :—‘‘ Mr. C. T. Har- risson was deeply respected and liked by us all. He impressed. one, on my first acquaintance, as being one whom the Ex- pedition Leader and we, his comrades, would ill have afforded to dispense with. Usually preoccupied in thought, and of earnest, serious manner, his slow, deliberate conversation was listened to attentively by the most thoughtful among us. Whether it was heaving on the ‘ Noah’s Ark ’ windlass to weigh anchor, turning out in the ‘wee sma’ hours of a dirty morning to haul—in_ bitter icy gale—on frozen topsail- halliards and weather braces, or taking a trick at the wheel, manning a boat in a ‘jobbly’ sea or ‘shovelling coal in the stoke-hole, Harrisson was ever to the fore. Harrisson’s sledging exploits around the ‘ Second Base ’ of the Expedition need no comment here, beyond remarking that he did as much—if not more—sledging than anybody else in the party, or indeed in the Expedition, with the exception of our courageous leader, Sir D. Mawson, and his own Base-leader, Mr. Frank Wild. “*His artistic work with brush, crayon and pastel excited universal admiration. The first icebergs we encountered, steaming south, he transferred to canvas, sketching with remarkable fidelity and rapidity the various shaded azure tints of the crevassed ice, and snow mantles of virgin white enshrouding the bergs. Harrisson was always ready to impart useful information from knowledge born of his years of practical training and experience, to any caring to avail themselves of the opportunity. In view of his many admir- able talents, and the circumstances that he was, in all things, a shining example to younger men, his presence on such an Xl. expedition was invaluable. The news of his loss with the ill-fated ‘ Endeavour’ throws an indescribable sadness over his comrades of other days, and it is safe to say the hearts of all beat with the deepest sympathy for his dear ones left to mourn his loss.” On his return from the Antarctic he was appointed by the Federal Government Biologist to the Fisheries Bureau. In this capacity his work was admirable, large collections were sorted out, and despatched with a skill and neatness much appreciated by those whose duty it was to deal with them at a later stage. As an expression of this appreciation a new shark has been callel by Mr. McCulloch Centrophorus harrissoni. In the interests of Australian Marine Biology it was hoped that he would long continue such excellent work. When he embarked on the last cruise of the “‘ Endeavour ” he had reached the age of forty-seven. Mr. W. L. May, a life-long neighbour, writes :—“‘ He was a man of most courteous and pleasant manner, and his loss will be deplored by a large circle of friends, of whom I am one.” C. HEDLEY. INTRODUCTORY NO BE: The Reports comprised in the ‘‘Zoological Results of the Fishing Experiments carried out by the F.I.S. ‘Endeavour’ ”’ have been prepared at the Australian Museum, Sydney, under the authority of the Trustees, and at the request of the Hon. The Minister for Trade and Customs. The material for investigation is sent direct from the - “‘Endeavour’’ by the Director of Fisheries (Mr. H. C. Dan- nevig) to the Australian Museum, and, after elaboration, is b) distributed as follows :—-All ‘‘types’’ are held in reserve for the Fisheries Branch of the Department of Trade and Customs ; a set of ‘‘co-types’’ are retained by the Trustees; the remainder of the specimens are distributed to the other Aus- tralasian State Museums in the name of the Minister for Trade and Customs. The Reports deal with the Fishes collected on the coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tas- mania. The Asteroidea and Sponges are from the same waters with the addition of those of the Queensland coast. The Mollusca are a more specialised series, chiefly obtained off Cape Wiles, South Australia. The new Asymmetron comes from the Great Australian Bight, and a sample of Globigerina Ooze was obtained to the east of Tasmania. my a a ik. Sa ; Ot | i bit | i" li P be iP i we om Ais aly Mi we el s i as Ais ili " ‘on be , “d Be - a A 24/3. I. Report on the Fishes obtained by the F.I.S. ‘* Endeavour,’ on the Coasts of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania. BY ALLAN R. McCULLOCH, Zoo_ocist, Australian Museum Sydney. Plates 1-xvI.; Text figs. 1-20. . ~~ u : Ce ’ ‘ d 4 | ype pet al | ‘a. 3a j Dit rity ist: / | { o L—REPORI: ON SHE BISHES: PART Ele I.—INTRODUCTION. The collections dealt with in this Report were obtained by the Federal Fisheries Investigation Ship ‘‘Endeavour,’’ under the direction of Mr. H. C. Dannevig. They were obtained at many localities along the New South Wales, Victorian, Tasmanian and South Australian coasts at various depths down to ninety fathoms. The present part deals with the greater number of the fishes forwarded for examination to the Australian Museum from this area, but the Scleroparei and Jugulares of the Acanthopterygii and the Pediculati and Plectognathi are reserved for a second part. In all about 1070 specimens, representing 94 species, have been critically examined, which, in conjunction with the large collections in the Australian Museum, have afforded excellent material for a detailed study of variation in many hitherto little known species. With a series of forty or fifty specimens from wide-spread localities before one, it is often a simple matter to recognise the identity of fishes which have been regarded as distinct when isolated examples afford no clue. In the follow- ing pages I have endeavoured to clear up the synonymy of species of Coelorhynchus, Physiculus, Seriolella, Callanthias, Ce@sioperca, etc., while figures are given showing the remark- able variation of Zanclistius, Macrorhamphosus, Centriscops, Beryx and others. Many of the more striking variations were specially selected by Mr. Dannevig on board the ship, and it is largely due to his discrimination in this direction that so many extreme forms are here dealt with. When individuals were lacking to complete a series he has gone to considerable trouble to obtain them, and in the case of fishes in which the colours were of importance, he has sent me fresh material packed in ice. For this and other valuable help I owe him my best thanks. I have also to acknowledge the kindness of the Com- mittee of the Macleay Museum who have allowed me to borrow some of Sir William Macleay’s type specimens for examination and comparison with the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collec- tions. Ten species are described as new, and four others and two genera are recorded from Australia for the first time. Thirty- three are figured, and I have to acknowledge the very willing assistance of Mr. Dene Fry, of the Australian Museum, in the preparation of the plates. 2 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. IIl.—DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES. Famiry HEXANCHID. GenuS HEPTRANCHIAS, Rafinesque. HEPTRANCHIAS PERLO, Bonnaterre. Seven-gilled Shark. (Plate 13pfie. 1-) Squalus perlo, Bonnaterre, Encycl. Meth., Ichth., 1788, p. ro. Squalus cinereus, Gmelin, Linn. Syst. Nat., 1789, p. 1497. Heptanchus cinereus, Muller & Henle, Plagiost., 1839, p. 81, play. Notidanus cinereus, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., vii, 1870, p. 398. The collection includes seven examples which I am unable to separate from the European H. perlo, Bonnaterre. ‘Their teeth agree exactly with Muller and Henle’s figure, and they also fit the description fairly well. I forwarded a photograph of one of the specimens, together with some notes, to Mr. C. Tate Regan for his opinion, and he has favoured me with the following reply :—‘‘So far as I can judge from your photo- graph the shark is H. cinereus.” These specimens are readily distinguished from H. indicus, Agassiz, the only other Australian species, by the following characters :— Head broad, snout broadly rounded; a single median tooth in the upper jaw; colour greyish with darker spots :—indicus. Head narrow, snout pointed; no single median tooth in the upper jaw; colour uniform grey :— perlo. All the specimens were taken in the one haul in 60-70 fathoms, sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria. Famiry HETERODONTID. Genus HETERODONTUS, Blainville. HETERODONTUS PHILIPPI, Bloch and Schneider. Port Jackson Shark, Bullhead Shark, Oyster Crusher. Squalus philippi, Bloch and Schneider, Syst. Ichth., 1801, PP: 737- Cestracion phillipi, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8)p2 4-5 1908, p. 495- FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 3 Specimens of this common species were preserved from the following localities :— Between Newcastle and Port Stephens, New South Wales, 22-60 tathoms. Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20 fathoms. Fifty miles south of Cape Wiles, South Australia, 75 fathoms. Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 70 fathoms. GENUS GYROPLEURODUS, Gill. GYROPLEURODUS GALEATUS, Giinther. Crested Port Jackson Shark. Cestracion galeatus, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870, p. 416. Gyropleurodus galeatus, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 1., 1908, p. 495. Two specimens from 43 fathoms, six miles off Port Stephens, New South Wales. Famiry SCYLIORHINID/-. GENUS SCYLIORHINUS, Blainville. SCYLIORHINUS ANALIS, Ogilby. Spotted Dog-fiskh, Spotted Cat-shark. Scyllium anale, Ogilby, Proc. Linn: Soc. N.S. Wales, x., 1885, Pp. 445. Scyliorhinus analis, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), 1., 1908, pp. 455 and 460. Scyllium maculatum, Ramsay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1880, p. 97; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 . (1883), p. 138 (nec. S. maculatum, Bl. Schn.). The collection includes two males, one from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and the other from off Babel Island, Bass Strait. Ogilby! has suggested that the specimen doubtfully recorded from Tasmania by R. M. John- ston as Scyllium maculatum is really this species, and this view is confirmed by the second ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen. The size of the anal tin is variable in different specimens of this species and therefore cannot be relied upon as has been done by Regan in his key to the species of Scyliorhinus. 1 Ogilby—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), iv., 1889, p. 180. 4 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. SCYLIORHINUS VINCENTI, Zietsz. (Plate 11., fig. 3, and fig. 1.) Scyllium vincenti, Zietz, Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, XXxXI., 1908, p. 287. Through the kindness of Professor E. C. Stirling, Director of the South Australian Museum, I have been able to compare one of Mr. Zietz’s specimens with another taken by the ‘‘En- deavour’’ in 20 tathoms off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia. They differ slightly in the relative positions of the fins which, however, I find to be equally variable in allied species. According to Zietz, the origin of the first dorsal is behind the middle of the total length. In both I have examined it is a little nearer the tip of the snout than the extremity of the tail. In the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen the base of the anal is shorter than that of the co-type and terminates below the anterior portion of the second dorsal instead of nearer the middle of that fin. ~The end of the bases of the ventrals is in advance of the origin of the dorsal, not below it, as described by Zietz, though in his specimen the flesh is shrunken around the base of the dorsal, making it appear farther forward than it really is. Finally, the colour in the better preserved example is a dark chocolate brown above, with numerous creamy-white spots all over the body and fins, except on the front half of the head. The dark cross-bands are ill-defined, and there appears to be a series of darker blotches on the sides. The belly is creamy-white in colour. The following is a description of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ speci- men :—Head to last gill-opening 5.3 in the length, its width 1.5 in its length; eye 6.5 in the head and about equal to half the length of the snout which is 3.1 in the head. The inter- orbital space is greater than the length of the snout. Preoral portion of the head 1.5 in the width of the mouth which is 2.4 in the head and greater than the snout. Body elongate, slightly compressed. Head depressed, flat above; snout rounded, blunt in profile, its width before the eyes one-third greater than its length. Eyes lateral, with the inferior fold well marked. Spiracle large, oval, and placed just behind the eye. Gill-slits decreasing in size back- wards, the last being about half as wide as the first and placed over the base of the pectoral. Nasal valves produced as lobes directed outwards and backwards, with emarginate posterior borders; they are separated from each other and from the mouth, the space between them being rather more than the FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 5 width of one lobe. No cirrus. A well-marked labial fold extends round the angle of the mouth, its anterior limb rather shorter than its posterior which extends less than half way towards the middle of the lower jaw. ‘Teeth similar in both jaws, arranged in several rows, tricuspid, with the median point longer than thg lateral ones. FIG, 1. First dorsal originating a little behind the posterior base of the ventrals and slightly in advance of the middle of the total length. The length of its base is much greater than its height ; its anterior margin is very oblique, and the posterior nearly vertical, and the lower angle is pointed. The second dorsal is a trifle higher than the first, and is of similar form, though the posterior angle 1s slightly produced; its origin is over the posterior portion of the anal, and the hinder angle is midway between the posterior insertion of the first dorsal and the tip of the caudal. The anal is considerably larger than either of the dorsals, and its base is longer than its dis- tance from the caudal; the posterior angle acute. Greatest breadth of the caudal a little less than one-third of its length. Posterior angles of the ventrals acute and the margins united in the male. Scales quadrilateral and keeled on the head, becoming tri- angular and acutely pointed dorsally and tricuspid on the sides. Colour.—Chocolate brown above, with ill-defined darker cross-bars. ‘There are indications of some dark blotches on the sides, and the hinder half of the head, body, tail and fins bear many creamy-white spots which tend to form rings. Total length of adult male 414 mm. 6 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. The tollowing key will serve to distinguish the four species of Scyliorhinus hitherto recorded from Australia :— a. Nasal valves separated from each other and from the mouth. b. Labial fold extending along the lower jaw half or less than half the distance to the symphysis. c. Body lighter with brown spots and sometimes cross- bands. Ventral fins of males not directly in con- tact behind the claspers but with an intermediate integument :— analis. cc. Body darker, with white spots and obscure cross- bands. Ventral fins of males in contact behind the * claspers :-—— vincentt. bb. Labial fold extending along the lower jaw nearly to the symphysis. d. Body with scattered darker spots:— maculatum. aa. Nasal valves overlapping the edge of the upper lip. e. Body with darker spots, sometimes confluent into cross bands or ocelli :— marmoratus- GENUS CEPHALOSCYLLIUM, Gill. CEPHALOSCYLLIUM ISABELLA, Bonnaterre. Swell Shark, Carpet Shark. L’ Isabelle, Broussonet, Mem. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1780, p. 648 (non binomial). Squalus isabella, Bonnaterre, Encycl. Meth., Ichth., 1788, p: 6: Squalus (i)sabella, Gmelin, Linn. Syst. Nat., 1789, p. 1489, Scyllium laticeps, Dumeril, Rev. et Mag. Zool., 1853, p. 84, Pl. Ciil:.,. HB). 2% Cephaloscyllium laticeps, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., 1., No- 2, 1900,)p:! 6., ipl. xiv., fig igmand pl sexi.d thie: aie Cephaloscyllium sabella, Waite, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., xli., 1910, p. 384. A small example is in the collection which was trawled off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 7 Famity ORECTOLOBIDZ:. GENUS PARASCYLLIUM, Gill. PARASCYLLIUM VARIOLATUM, Dumeril. (Plate ii., fig. 1.) Hemiscylliium variolatum, Dumeril, Rev. et. Mag. Zool., 1853, Pol2h, plo tiene. 12 Parascyllium variolatum, Ogilby and McCulloch, Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S.Wales, xlii., 1908, p.260. Two fine female examples were taken off Port Phillip Heads in November, 1909. PARASCYLLIUM COLLARE, Kamsay and Odgtlby. Collared Cat Shark. Parascylium collare, Ramsay and Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soe. Nes Wales (2), -1., 1886s. p= 1310; 1d., “Ogilby and McCulloch, Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S. Wales, xlii., 1908, p. 267. Three males from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. PARASCYLLIUM FERRUGINEUM, Sp. nov. (Plate 11., fig. 2, and fig. 2.) Head to last gill-opening, 5.8 in the length, its width 1% in its length. Eye g in the head, 2.8 in the snout which is 3.2 in the head. Interorbital space almost equal to the snout. Preoral portion of head equal to half the width of the mouth which is 1.3 in the snout. Body elongate, somewhat depressed anteriorly, cylindrical posteriorly. Head much depressed with its upper surface flat; snout broadly rounded, obtusely conical in profile and increasing in width backwards. Eyes lateral with a prominent fold below. Spiracle minute and situated half an eye-diameter from the infero-posterior angle of the eye. Gill-openings in- creasing regularly in size from the first to the fourth, the last very large, 3% the width of the first and more than half as long as the snout; the last two are placed over the base of the pectoral. Nasal cirrus short and thick, just reaching to the lips; exterior nasal fold with two or three small lobes posteriorly, the outer the longest and pointed. Lower labial fold extending about half way towards the middle of the jaw and continued round the angle of the mouth. Teeth similar in 8 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. both jaws, small, flattened, triangular and acute, with rounded projections on each side basally but not tricuspid. First dorsal fin originating well behind the ventrals, but a little nearer the tip of the snout than the end of the tail; its posterior margin nearly vertical and forming a right angle with the lower margin. Second dorsal subequal to the first and of similar form, its hinder angle about midway between the posterior insertion of the first and the tip of the caudal. Anal fin low with its outer border oblique and terminating below the anterior part of the second dorsal; the length of its base about 14 in its distance from the caudal. Greatest breadth of the caudal a little less than one-fourth its length. Pectorals longer than broad, with the angles rounded. Ven- trals quadrilateral, 1% as long as broad. Colour.—Greyish brown above with indistinct darker cross- bands; the first narrow and extending between the eyes, the next broader and covering the space between the gill-openings. There are two more before the first dorsal and one in front of the second dorsal. Entire body with evenly spaced large brown spots which are darkest on the cross-bars and become elongate on the caudal. Three similar spots on each side of the nuchal band. Fins also with spots which are most numerous on the dorsal. Type.—A female, 730 mm. long, taken outside Port Phillip Heads, Victoria, in November, 1909. Of the two described species of Parascyllium this is nearest allied to P. collare, Rams. and Ogil., but it may be at once distinguished by its much broader head, more rounded snout, larger fins and different colouration. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 9 Famity CARCHARIID. GENus GALEUS, Rafinesque. GALEUS AUSTRALIS, Macleay. School Shark. Galeus australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi., 1881, p. 354. Six small examples, each about 110 mm. long, were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tasmania. GENUS) PRIONACE, Cantor. PRIONACE GLAUCA, Linneus. Blue Shark. y | Squalus glaucus, Linneus, Syst. Nat., roth ed., 1758, p. 235. A number of specimens of this widely distributed species were caught with hand-lines off the South Australian coast. Famiry SPHYRNIDAE. GENUS SPHYRNA, Rafinesque. SPHYRNA LEWINI, Lord. Hammer-headed Shark. Zygena lewini, Lord in Griffith, Anim. Kingd., x., 1834, p- 640. One small male from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Famity SQUALID. GENUS SQUALUS, Linn@us. SQUALUS MEGALOPS, Macleay. Dog-fish. Acanthias megalops, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, Vie LOOT, 0. 307. Numerous examples of this species were preserved from off Babel and Flinders Islands, Bass Strait. Famiry PRISTIOPHORID-. GENUS PRISTIOPHORUS, Miiller and Henle. PRISTIOPHORUS CIRRATUS, Latham. Saw Shark. Pristis cirratus, Latham, Trans. Linn. Soc., i1., 1794, p. 281, pl. xxvi., fig. 5, and pl. xxvii. Numerous foetal specimens and several young of this species are in the collection from Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and north of Goose Island, Bass Strait. Io “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PRISTIOPHORUS NUDIPINNIS, Giinther. Saw Shark. (Plate 1., fig. 2.) Pristiophorus nudipinnis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., vili., 1870, p. 432; 1d., McCoy, Prodr. Zool: Vict.; 1881, pl. Ivi., fig. 2; id., Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), i1., 1908, p. 57. : The collection includes several foetal and young specimens from off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20 fathoms, and from Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. Plate 1., fig. 2, represents a young example, 445 mm. long, from the latter locality. Famity SQUATINID. GENUS SQUATINA, Dumeril. SQUATINA SQUATINA, Linneus. Angel Shark. Squalus squatina, Linnzeus, Syst. Nat., 10 ed., 1758, p. 233- Rhina squatina, McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., Dec. iv., 1879, pl. xacxiv. Young and foetal examples were preserved from the follow- ing localities :— Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. North-west of Greenly Island, South Australia, 44 fathoms. Forty-two miles south of St. Francis Island, South Aus- tralia, 35 fathoms. Famity RAJID AE. GeENus Raja, Linne@us. RAJA AUSTRALIS, Macleay. Skate. Raia australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, viii., 1884, p. 461. Raja australis, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 40, pl. iv. Two large males were preserved from the Shoalhaven Bight, N.S. Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Raja nitipa, Giinther. (Fig. 3-) Raja nitida, Gunther, ‘‘Challenger’’ Rept., Zool. i., 1880, Po 27 Pi ive fie: a. This species has hitherto been known only from a small male, five inches wide, from off Twofold Bay, New South Wales, 120 fathoms. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection includes FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 11 three females and one male from seven and a half to eight inches wide, which present considerable differences from Ginther’s figure, but, in view of their larger size and the fact that they come from deep water, 90 fathoms, only one to two hundred miles from Twofold Bay, I have no hesitation in identifying them with this species. The most striking difference lies in the teeth which are described as ‘‘with very small points, almost obtuse.’’ This description fits those of my female specimens which are almost pavement-like with blunt points, but in the male they are long and acute. The development of spines on the head and body, pectorals and tail, is much greater in the larger specimens, though less in the female than the male. None of my specimens have quite the same outward form as the young one figured, but this is variable in the different speci- mens and does not afford a specific character. Finally, the dark blotches shown in the figure are wanting in my four, though the clusters of white spots are similarly distributed. The following description is drawn up from the four **En- deavour’’ specimens :— Snout to anterior nostrils 3.3 in the head to the last gill-slit. Interorbital space less than two-thirds of the eye, which is 4.7 in the head. Width of the mouth about 3.5 in the head. Disk very broad, its width greater than the length from the tip of the snout to its hinder margin; its anterior margin more or less undulated, the border of the pectoral either forming an unbroken line or distinct angle with the sides of the head ; hinder margin rounded and somewhat angular posteriorly- Snout with a small median papilla. The distance between the outer borders of the eyes is greater than that between the latter and the edge of the disk. Preoral length of the head equal to the width between the outer edges of the spiracles. Nasal lobes produced backwards and outwards, the space between them less than half the preoral length. Inner margin of the nostrils with two interior and one exterior lobe when folded, all of which form a broad-mouthed tube when ex- panded. Gill-slits decreasing in size backwards, much smaller than the spiracle which is-about half the length of the eye. Teeth small, with expanded though not confluent bases in the male, and long median points directed backwards. In the female they are rounded, flattened and juxtaposed, the median point being reduced to a small prominence only. Entire upper surface covered with minute prickles directed backwards. ‘There are two large curved spines before each eye and three or four behind them. One to three are present on the mid-line behind the head, which may be surrounded by 12 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. several smaller ones also. Behind these are several irregular rows of thorns which range themselves in one median row and two lateral ones on the tail and extend to the first dorsal fin. —_— ae Ne SS ne —— a ~~ FIG. 3. Sides of the pectoral without larger thorns in the female, but these are well developed in the male, the innermost ones being the largest. Entire lower surface perfectly smooth. Dorsal fins subequal, the space between them half or less than half the length of their bases. In some the interval between the second dorsal and the caudal is equal to that between the two dorsals, in others the two fins are almost united. A skinny flap, which is widest posteriorly, extends varying distances along the sides of the tail, sometimes reach- ing as far as the ventrals. Colour.—Light brown above with very indistinct darker marblings. Clusters of white spots are scattered over the body, the most prominent of which is on the mid-line behind the head, two pairs on each side of it, and one near the middle of each pectoral fin. Total length 350 mm. Trawled in go fathoms, east Si East Sister Island, Bass Strait, and elsewhere off the Victorian Coast. RAJA WAITH, sp. nov. (Plate iii., and fig. 4.) Space between the nostrils equal to their distance from the tip of the snout. Greatest width of the mouth 2.5 in the head to the last gill-slit. Interorbital width 5 in the same, and a little greater than the length of the eye. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. rege Disk broad and rounded, ‘its length 1.1 In its breadth. Snout broadly rounded, with a median rounded papilla, and confluent with the anterior margins of the pectorals which are almost straight. The lateral margins of the pectorals are rounded, as is the angle between them and the posterior border. The distance between the outer margins of the eyes is greater than that of the latter from the edge of the disk. Preoral length much less than the distance between the outer margins of the spiracles and 2.7 in the head to the last gill- opening. Width of the spiracles one-third the preoral length. >— FIG. 4, Nasal lobes produced backwards and outwards, the exterior margins truncate, the posterior sinuate; the distance between them near the mouth about two-thirds of that between the nostrils. Nostrils with a raised tubular margin which forms a lobe posteriorly. Gill-slits decreasing in size backwards, the 14 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. first rather more than half the width of the spiracle. Teeth small and rounded, scarcely juxtaposed, each with a small median point. Upper surface of disk quite smooth except for two pairs of spines above the anterior part of the eyes and four over the posterior portions. Several minute spines are also present on the upper eye-lid. ‘Tail with several rows of spines which are largest anteriorly but most numerous posteriorly. Both dorsal fins are also covered with minute spines. Dorsal fins subequal, the space between them equal to half the length of their bases. Caudal absent. A broad skinny flap extends along each side of the tail as far as the end of the ventrals. Anterior lobes of the ventrals greatly produced, the gaps between them and the posterior lobes each with four small triangular lobes. On the upper surface, where the fins are covered by the disk, there is a pair of large fatty glands. Colour.—Pale brown above with lighter patches which are covered with small brown dots. Body, fins and tail with numerous small bluish spots which are absent only on the lighter patches on the disk; in places they are confluent and form reticulate patterns. Lower surfaces slate-coloured. Length of specimen 454 mm. A single female specimen was trawled in 44 fathoms, north- west of Greenly Island, South Australia. This species is at once distinguished from all other Aus- tralian species of Raja by its rounded and perfectly smooth body. Famity NARCOBATIDA. GENUS NARCINE, Henle. NARCINE TASMANIENSIS, Richardson. Tasmanian Numb-fish. Narcine tasmaniensts, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1841, p:-22, and Trans. Zool. gSoe.,, 1i.,-0849, «ps 176, pl xt., heats ae ent were preserved from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. amity DASYBATID/E. Genus UroLopnuus, Miiller and Henle. UROLOPHUS CRUCIATUS, Lacépede. Banded Stingaree. Raja cruciatus, Lacépéde, Ann. Mus., iv., 1804, pp. 201 and 210, lesan oo.) 2. Urolophus cruciatus, Richardson, Zool. Erebus and Terror, Fishes, 1844, p. 35, pl. xxiv. Two specimens from 4o fathoms off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. 15 Famity AETOBATID. Genus AEtTOBATUS, Blainville. AETOBATUS AUSTRALIS, Macleay. Eagle Ray. Myliobatis aquila, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., viii., 1870, p- 489; id., Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1., 1872, p. 225 (nec Raja aquila, Linn.). Myliobatis nieuhofii, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1., 1872, p. 226, and ii., 1873, p. 58 (nec Raja nieuhofi, Bl. Schn. ). Myliobatis australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi., 1881, p. 380; id., McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict., pl. Ixiil., 1882. A young specimen is preserved from the Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Gunther identified some very young Myliobatis from Sydney with M. aquila, Linneus, though he noted certain characters in their teeth which did not agree with those of that species. Castelnau (1873) suggested that this identification was in- correct and considered that they were probably the young of M. nieuhofi, Bl. Schn. Waite regarded them as M. australis, Macleay, as is evident from the fact that he omitted aquila from his list of the fishes of New South Wales.! In another paper? he expressed the opinion that WM. nieuhofi and M. aus- tvalis were identical, but it would seem that they differ in the forms of their snouts, it being somewhat produced in the former, and blunt and short in the latter. McCoy showed that M. australis occurred in Port Phillip, and under the circumstances I have little doubt that Castel- nau’s specimens were really that species and not M. nieuhofi. I therefore arrange the synonymy as above. Famity CHIMAERIDE. GENUS CHIM&RA, Linn@us. CHIMERA OGILBYI, Waite. Ghost Shark. Chimera ogilbyi, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., pt. 1., 1899, p. 48, pl. vi. ; id., Shigeho Tanaka, Journ. Coll. Sci. Imp. Wniv. Vokio, xxau., Art: 7, pote: 1 Waite—Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club., ii., i904. 2Waite-—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 47. 16 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Two males are in the collection which were trawled in 40 fathoms off the East Coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Waite’s specimens were all females, but the males have been well described by Shigeho Tanaka from Japan. Famity CALLORHYNCHID-. GENUS CALLORHYNCHUS, Cuvier. CALLORHYNCHUS CALLORYNCHUS, Linn@us. Elephant-fish. Callorhynchus callorynchus, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i., Nor 2)-1900,, p. 23, pl. sau, figs 2. A small specimen is preserved taken off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, and six others from the Victorian coast: Famity CLUPEID. GENUS CLUPEA, Linneus. CLUPEA (POMOLOBUS) BASSENSIS, sp. nov. Australian Sprat. (Plate iv., fig. 2.) Clupea sprattus, Gunther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1871, p. 672 (nec ’. sprattus, Linnzeus). DP 185, Av 18-207 0P. 17>) Vanes © 1914 Scales) a4eore: Body elongate, its greatest breadth less than half its height, which is 4.4 to 4.8 in the length from the snout to the hypural. Belly somewhat rounded, the scutes small, twenty-one between the head and the ventrals, and eleven more to the vent. Scales large, cycloid, commencing above the preopercle and extending onto the base of the tail. Head 3.5 to 4 in the length, and either very little or con- siderably longer than the body is deep. Eye 3.1 to 3.6 in the head, with a narrow adipose lid before and behind. Inter- orbital space flat, equal to about two-thirds of the eye. Maxillary very large, its greatest width one-third its length, reaching to below the anterior third or almost to the middle of the eye; supplemental bone very large. Upper posterior border of the operculum emarginate; hindermost portion formed of a skinny flap. Cheeks and upper portion of oper- culum covered with translucent flesh, the rest of the head naked. Lower margin ,of the maxillary microscopically denticulate. A few microscopic teeth are placed at widely- spaced intervals on the anterior part of the jaws.! Origin of the dorsal well in advance of the middle of the total length and just behind the vertical of the ventral fins ; 1 Gunther stated that he found palatine teeth in his specimens “as well developed as in Cl. sprattus.’’ I have failed to find any in either species, but this character is generally admitted to be inconstant. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 7 the length of its base is just about equal to the distance from the tip of the snout to the hinder margin of the eye and longer than the anterior rays. Anal low, its length much greater than that of the dorsal. Ventrals as long as half their distance from the vent. Colour.—Silvery, the upper third of the body dark blue. Scattered darker specks are found on the jaws and preorbitals and on the caudal peduncle. Rays of the dorsal, caudal and pectoral fins also dark spotted. Length of largest specimen 117 mm. Described from two specimens from off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Others are from the entrance to Storm Bay, Tas- mania. It is only after a detailed comparison of these specimens with many others of C. sprattus from the London markets that I venture to regard them as distinct. They appear to differ by their more elongate form, my deepest specimen, the one figured, having the depth of the body less than the length of the head, whereas in C. sprattus it is considerably deeper. That species further seems invariably to have but seven rays in the ventral fin without counting the imperfect short one in front. All of C. bassensis have eight. C. antipodum, Hector, is a very distinct species with a much shorter body, well developed abdominal scutes, and with the ventral placed below instead of just in advance of the anterior portion of the dorsal. From C. sajax, Jenyns, the new species is at once distinguished by the position of its ventral fin. In 1867 a note from Mr. J. E. Calder was published! in which he recorded an immense shoal of these Herrings being driven ashore in Simmons’ Cove, Bruni Island, Tasmania, by Barracouta, Kingfish and others. He considered there were about one hundred tons of them on the shore and fully two hundred more at the bottom of the water, all dead. Carts and boats were used to take them away for manure, yet they were scarcely lessened in quantity. Mr. Allport also noted that a similar shoal had been observed in 1844, and numbers of the fish had passed far up into the Derwent River. CLUPEA (CLUPANODON) NEOPILCHARDUS, Steindachner. Pilchard. Clupanodon neopilchardus, Steindachner, Denk. K. Akad. Wass. Wien xii: 1970; p. iz: Three specimens from 26-30 fathoms, eight miles off Wooded Bluff, Clarence River, New South Wales, are of 1 Calder—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1867, p. 5. 18 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. interest as showing how far north this species extends on our coast. It extends around southern Australia and up to Hout- man’s Abrolhos on the west coast, and is also known from Vasmania and New Zealand. Famity ARGENTINIDZ. GENUS ARGENTINA, Linn@us. ARGENTINA ELONGATA, Hutton. Argentina elongata, Hutton, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), iii., LO7Owpeiseu td-, VWaitemwec, Cantb.sMins:5 45, moninep: TOL ple xiv. Thirteen examples of this species, 65-125 mm. long, differ from a larger one from New Zealand only in the colour-mark- ings. All have a dark band above the silvery lateral line on which are arranged six to nine blackish spots. Near the tail there is a second series on the lateral line and more or less alternate to those above them. There is also a dark mark on the side of the snout. Though they can be traced, these markings are very indistinct in the larger specimen. They were taken at the following localities :— Entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 30 fathoms. Fifteen miles off Norah Head, New South Wales, 45-58 fathoms. No species of this genus has been previously recorded from Australian waters. Famity SYMBRANCHID&. GENUS CHEILOBRANCHUS, Richardson. CHEILOBRANCHUS RUFUS, Macleay. Red-banded Shore Eel. Chilobranchus rufus, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, Wiss OOL spy 200, Cheilobranchus rufus, Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., Vi1., 1906, Dros asplimexxivicy fies om Numerous specimens were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tas- mania. Famity LEPTOCEPHALID@. GENUS CONGERMUR-ENA, Kaup. CONGERMUR-ENA HABENATA, Richardson. Little Conger Eel. Congrus habenatus, Richardson, Zool. Ereb. & Terr., Fishes, [846; P- "209, plod, Gea ey. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 19 Congromurena longicauda, Ramsay & Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales (2), ii., 1888) p. 1o22. A single specimen from Port Arthur, Tasmania, belongs to the long-tailed form of this species. Comparison with five other Australian specimens and one from New Zealand shows that the lengths of the body and tail are variable and have no specific value. As this is the only character which can be relied upon to distinguish C. longicauda from C. habenata, the former name can no longer stand. Famity MYRID. GENUS MuR-ENICHTHYS, Bleeker. MuUR-ENICHTHYS TASMANIENSIS, sp. nov. (Fig. 5.) Body worm-like, the depth 3.3 in the head. Head 12.8 in the total length, and 4.3 in the space between the gill opening and the vent. Eve 3.2 in the snout, which is long and obtusely pointed, and 4.8 in the head. Cleft of mouth extending far behind the eye, and 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of the mouth. Tube of anterior nostril with a minute exterior lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril overhanging the lip and placed below the anterior portion of the eye. Teeth in single rows on the jaws and palate; three or four larger ones on either side of the vomer. Rows of widely- spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper surface of the snout and behind the eyes. Gill-opening narrow, about as wide as the eye. The lateral line appears to be almost straight anteriorly, but the sides of the head between the gill-opening and the preoperculum are considerably damaged and render this character uncertain. Vent well in advance of the middle of the length, its distance from the tip of the snout 1.4 in the tail. Dorsal and anal fins very low, almost rudimentary. Origin of the dorsal a trifle nearer the tip of the snout than the tail, its distance from the vent equal to the length of the head. +SEE = reer 5 fe a Nn rar er ae Si a a A ne OSes 3) - ae oS y] SS < Se FIG. 5. Colour.—Pale green in formalin, the upper portion speckled with minute brown dots which are of uniform size. Anteriorly they are confined to the upper half of the body, but posteriorly they approach the lower surface. On the head they extend onto the sides and the lower jaw. Length 170 mm. One specimen from the entrance to Oyster ‘Bay, Tasmania. 36 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. This species differs from the specimen I have identified as M. breviceps, Gunther, in the position of the origin of the dorsal which is behind instead of far in advance of the vent. It has also a much longer and sharper snout, smaller eye, and more rudimentary fins; the colour-marking is different, the spots on the back being similar to those on the sides, and they extend onto the sides of the head and the lower jaw. It is very closely allied to, and possibly identical with M. australis, Macleay, but differs from the five specimens I have examined of that species in having the origin of the dorsal far instead of only slightly behind that of the anal. The snout is also somewhat longer, being 4.8 in the head instead of 5.3. MuR2&NICHTHYS AUSTRALIS, Macleay. (Fig. 6.) ?Murenichthys gymnotus ?, Gunther, Chall. Rept., Zool., 1., 1880, p. 30 (nec Bleeker). Murenichthys australis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, vi., 1881, p. 272. Body terete and vermiform, its depth behind the gill open- ing 3.3, behind the vent 3.9 in the head. Head 13 in the total length, and 4.5 in the trunk. Eye very small, nearly 3 in the snout, which is obtusely pointed and 5.3 in the head. Cleft of mouth extending far behind the eye, its length from the tip of the snout 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of the mouth. Tube of anterior nostril with a minute exterior lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril overhanging the lip and placed below the anterior margin of the eye. Teeth in single rows on the jaws and palate; three or four larger ones on either side of the vomer. Rows of widely-spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper surface of the snout, behind the eye and up towards the origin of the lateral line. Gill opening as wide as the eye. Lateral line a little arched over the branchial sac. Vent wel! in advance of the middle of the length, its distance from the end of the snout 1.35 in the tail. Dorsal and anal fins very low except near the end of the tail where they are a little broadened out and extend around the point. The origin of the dorsal is a little behind that of the anal, not over the vent as stated by Macleay. ——— ] FIG. 6. Colour.—After long preservation, uniform brown, with minute darker specks above the lateral line and on the head where they extend onto the sides and lower jaw. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 21 Described from the type, 248 mm. long, from Lane Cove, Port Jackson. Two other specimens are in the Macleay Museum without data, and two in the Australian Museum from Port Jackson. I am indebted to Professors W. A. Haswell and T. W. E. David for the opportunity of redescribing and figuring Macleay’s original specimen. It is very probable that the specimen from Port Jackson which Gunther doubtfully identified as M. gymnotus, Bleeker, is not that species but is M. australis. The two may be easily distinguished, the latter having but a single row of maxillary teeth instead of several, and its mouth extending not slightly but far behind the eye. Ogilby has proposed the genus Scolecenchelys! for this species, and in a letter he informs me that it ‘‘differs from Murenichthys in the much more slender and elongate body and the origin and dev elopment of the dorsal fin (as comparing australis with breviceps).’’ I regard these as specific rather than generic characters. MUR4ENICHTHYS BREVICEPS, Giinther. (Fig. 7-) ?Murenichthys macropterus, lunzinger, Arch. Nat., XXXViil., i., 1872, p. 43 (nec Bleeker). Murenchthys breviceps, Giinther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4), XVile 1970, AO A nam specimen, 195 mm. long, from South Auceraka, is possibly the young of this species. As will be seen by the figure, its proportions do not quite agree with those of the type, which is twenty inches long, but the differences may perhaps be accounted for by its small size. The following is a description of the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimen :— Body worm-like, the depth 4 in the head. Head 10.8 in the total length and 2.7 in the trunk. Eye 2.6 in the snout, which is 44 in the head. Cleft of the mouth extending far behind the eye and 2.7 in the head; a longitudinal fold below the end of the mouth. ‘Tube of the anterior nostril very large, with a minute external lobe; flap covering the posterior nostril over- hanging the lip and placed just before the eye. Rows of large widely-spaced pores extend along each jaw, on the upper sur- face of the head and behind the eye. Lateral line arched above the branchial sac. Dorsal and anal fins very low, extending 1 Ogilby—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxii., i897, p. 240. 22 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. around the end of the tail. Origin of the dorsal a trifle nearer the tip of the snout than the vent, its distance from the gill opening 2.3 in that from the vent. —= oe FIG. 7. Colour.—Pale green in formalin, speckled with minute brown dots which are very small and crowded on the upper surface, and larger near the lateral line; anteriorly they scarcely extend below the middle of the body, but posteriorly they approach the ventral surface. Extreme end of the dorsal and caudal darker, the fins otherwise colourless. Trawled in 35 fathoms, south of St. Francis Island, South Australia. The specimens identified as Murenichthys macropterus, Bleeker, from Port Phillip and the Murray River, are probably not that species, but are M. breviceps, which is said by its author to differ from the former by its comparatively shorter head and longer snout. Famity AULOPID/E. GENUS AULOPUS, Cuvier. AULOPUS PURPURISSATUS, Richardson. Sergeant Baker. Aulopus purpurissatus, Richardson, Icones Piscium, 1843, p- Wie ipl iis ihe. 3. Already known from western and eastern Australia, this species is now recorded from South Australia, a specimen having been trawled in 75 fathoms, fifty miles south of Cape Wiles. Famity SUDID/Z. GENUS CHLOROPHTHALMUS, Bonaparte. CHLOROPHTHALMUS NIGRIPINNIS, Giinther. Cucumber Fish. Chlorophthalmus nigripinnis, Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5) il 1878, p. 182, ande@nall. Rept.) Zool) scxiit, ap: 193, opls lt whic. “a; id. VWeate,, Proc. "NoZ. inst. woTo; p. 25) and Rec. Cantb. Mais 1.) 1911, p: 164, "plo xxv. This species exhibits considerable variation in its markings according to age, young specimens of about five inches long having the sides blotched and spotted with bluish-grey, whereas others of eleven inches are immaculate. The mark- FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 2 H ings on the fins also differ in intensity in a large series of specimens. C. nigripinnis was, until recently, known only from the deeper waters of New South Wales. Waite has recorded it from New Zealand, however, and it must now be added to the Victorian and Tasmanian lists, about one hundred and fifty specimens having been preserved from the following localities :— Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Famity MACRORHAMPHOSIDE. Genus MACRORHAMPHOSUS, Lacépede. MACRORHAMPHOSUS ELEVATUS, Waite. Bellows Fish. (Figgs83) Macrorhamphosus scolopax, var. elevatus, Waite, Mem. AUIStE MUS. piv sLO90, Pa SOmple Vile, 2. Ti Macrorhamphosus gallinago, Ogilby, Proc. Roy. Soc. Qld., Mexia) LOGS. ips 10: In the Report of the ‘‘Thetis’’” Expedition, Waite noted certain characters in which his specimens differed from the published descriptions of M. scolopax, but in consideration of the variations to which members of this genus are subject, he regarded the Australian representative as but a variety of that species. Having compared specimens of each, I am able to point out that there are well marked specific differences between them. Examples of M. elevatus of the same size as others of M. scolopax are much deeper and have shorter and thicker snouts. The variations in the lengths of the spines in different specimens of M. scolopax have been tabulated by Gunther,! and I find similar though less striking variations in the Australian species, but it is always longer and usually much longer than the snout in M. elevatus, whereas it appears to be usually if not always shorter in M. scolopax. The large series of specimens available to me shows that the relative depth of the body increases considerably with age, but it is also clear that the exact form of the body differs even in specimens of the same length. Under these circum- stances I have no hesitation in “regarding M. gallinago, Ogilby, as identical with M. elevatus, especially as there are ‘“Thetis’’ specimens which only differ from Ogilby’s descrip- 1 Gunther—Brit. Mus. Oat. Fish., iji., 1861, p. 519. ; 24 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. tion in having eighteen instead of sixteen anal rays.1 The last dorsal spine is minute and often rudimentary, while the position of the base of the second spine is altered by the development or otherwise of the hump on the back. In order to show the change with growth more clearly I give a figure of the smallest specimen of the series for com- parison with Waite’s figure of the adult. It is 66 mm. long and was trawled off Cape Three Points, New South Wales, in 32-40 fathoms. As Centriscus scolopax, this species has been recorded from Tasmania by Johnston,? and there is a specimen in the Aus- tralian Museum collection from Ulverstone. The ‘‘Endea- vour’’ trawled it at the following stations :— Twenty miles off Babel Island, Bass Strait, 68 mene Off the east coast of Bide Island, Bass Strait, 60 fathoms. Disaster Bay, New South Wales, 45 fathoms. Between Port Stephens and Sydney, New South Wales, 22-65 fathoms. Ogilby’s specimen of M. gallinago came from the Tweed River Heads at the northern boundary of New South Wales. GENUS CENTRISCOPS, Gill. CENTRISCOPS HUMEROSUS, Richardson. (Plate v., and! fig.-9.) Centriscus humerosus, Richardson, Voy. ‘‘Erebus’’ and = error, | Fishes, 1846, pegs6, pl xxxiv., figs. 5-0; d-- Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii1., 1861, p. 522. 1 Mr. J. D. Ogilby has very kindly compared “Thetis” specimens with his type and he informs me that he considers them to be identical. He further notes that the latter has eighteen and not sixteen anal rays as described, a mistake due to a printer’s error. 2 Johnston—Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 123. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 25 As Richardson’s description and figure of this species were prepared from a dried specimen which had apparently shrunk considerably, they are very inaccurate. Certain errors were corrected by Gunther in his later description of the same specimen, so that it only remains to give reliable figures to place the species on a sound basis. My specimens differ from the original description in the following details. None show the mesial row of small scutes before the dorsal spine, while those on the sides and around the vent are so differently arranged that they must have been considerably distorted in the type. The ‘‘acute curved teeth at the base in front’’ of the dorsal spine really represent a small detached spine anteriorly, and a pair of lateral ones, the latter being only occasionally developed. Finally, the skin is not nearly so rough as figured, but is covered with closely-set microscopic spines which give a veivety feel to the touch. te > LO IG. 9. The form of the body changes greatly with growth, the body becoming much deeper and the snout longer, while the dorsal spines are greatly reduced. The eye is comparatively larger in young specimens. Full grown specimens develop a peculiar patch of bristles on the dorsal line just before the hump of the back. They are also very beautifully coloured in life, though the only tints remaining in my specimens are delicate rose-pink areas on the breast and upper portion of the sides which bear numerous large silvery spots and bars. A silvery pink bar is present on the snout below and before the eye. A broad oblique dark bar extends from behind the 26 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. pectorals to the origin of the anal, behind which is a similar lighter band, and both are bordered with silvery streaks. The smallest and largest specimens in the collection are the two selected for illustration, and measure 70 mm. and 265 mm. respectively. Mr. Dannevig says this species is exceed- ingly abundant in the deeper waters of southern Australia, and one hundred and seventy-eight specimens were preserved from the following localities :— Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Off Storm Bay, Tasmania. Babel Island, near Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 68 fathoms. East from E. Sister Island, Bass Strait, go fathoms. Sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms. Famiry SYNGNATHID. GENUS CORYTHROICHTHYS, Kaup. CORYTHROICHTHYS PHILLIPI, Lucas. (Fig. 10.) Syngnathus phillipi, Lucas, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. (n. ser.), ill. LEOISnps kes Four specimens of this species were obtained in Oyster Bay, Tasmania. They differ from Lucas’ excellent descrip- tion only in having the osseus rings and fin rays rather more numerous which brings the formula up to the following :— D. 25-28, osseus rings 18-19 + 44-48. This species is very closely allied to the more northern C. margaritifer, Peters, but is distinguished by having a larger number of tail rings, the dorsal fin placed a little farther back in relation to the vent, and by the greater development of the ridges of the head and body, particularly the ventral keel. FIG. 10. | Corythroichthys intestinalis, Ramsay. Having had occasion to compare the above-mentioned specimens with Syngnathus intestinalis, Ramsay,! I dis- covered that the types of that species were not Australian, as has been generally supposed, but came from Bougainville Island in the Solomon Group. Ramsay gave no locality, but merely stated that they were taken from the intestinal cavity 1 Ramsay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 494. FISHES.—MCOULLOCH. 27 of Holothuria. Duncker! considers this species to be syn- onymous with C. cons picillatus, Jenyns,?2 together with several other species described by Jordan and his colleagues. Having examined all the material available to me, I am sure that C. intestinalis and C. waitei, Jord. & Seale,3 are identical, and, as I have recorded? the latter from Cooktown, Queens- land, Ramsay’s species is rightly included in Australian literature. | GENUS SOLEGNATHUS, Swainson. SOLEGNATHUS SPINOSISSIMUS, Giinther. Spiny Sea-Horse. Solenognathus spinosissimus, Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish. Vili, LOZO,)p: 195); 74-, Waites Proc) Linn: Soc. iN:S. Wales, ix. (2), 1894, p. 222, pl. xvii., figs. 5 and 8. Sixteen specimens of this species were preserved. They were obtained in 15-45 fathoms in Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales. SOLEGNATHUS FASCIATUS, Giinther. Solenognathus fasciatus, Ginther, Chall. Rep., Zool., i., Teco, p. 20, pl xiv., fie. Bo; 1dyy Waite, Proc. Linn. ‘Soc: N.S. Wales, ix. (2), 1894, pp. ‘220 and 227. Duncker® considers this species to be identical with the pre- ceding. I have carefully compared the thirteen specimens obtained with those of S. spinosissimus and have endeavoured to find some more definite character than the form of the scutes to distinguish the two. They are, however, identical in every other respect, and though this one difference holds good in a large number of specimens, yet the species cannot but be considered to be based on a very uncertain footing. The scutes are well shown by Waite in the figures quoted. Though several specimens have the pseudo-marsupium in such a condition that it is evident that they were carrying eggs when obtained, only two have them still attached. The most perfect of these bears forty-five eggs, and it would seem that only a very few are missing. ‘They are very similar to those of S. spinosissimus as described by Waite, but are in a less advanced stage of development, and are arranged in about five very irregular rows commencing directly behind the vent 1 Duncker—Faun. Sudwest-Austr., ii., 1909, p. 237. 2 Jenyns—Zool. Beagle, iii., 1842, p. 147, pl. xxvii., fig. 4. 3 Jordan and Seale—Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., xxv., 1905 (1906), p. 212, fig. 17.. 4 McCulloch—Proe. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxxv., 1910, p. 432. 5 Duncker—Faun. Sudwest-Austr., ii., 1909, p. 235. 28 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. and occupying thirteen tail-rings. “They were collected in the latter part of November, 1909. The specimens are from the following localities :— South-east from Babel Island, off Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Disaster Bay, southern New South Wales. SOLEGNATHUS ROBUSTUS, sp. nov. (Platesec, tice 725) D. 34, P. 24-25. Body rings, 26 + 50. Head 6'4 in the length and 3°7 in the trunk. Length of tail a little less than the distance between the vent and the pec- torals, its depth behind the dorsal 3'2 in the base of that fin. Snout 1°7 in the head, its depth nearly 5 in its length, and less than the diameter of the eye which is 4°1 in the snout. Narrowest interorbital width a little less than half the diameter of the eye. Dorsal fin occupying ten body rings, the length of its base almost equal to the distance between the tip of the snout and the posterior border of the eye. The lateral row of scutes is not continued along the side of the tail as in S. hardwickii, but passes upwards and merges into the supero-lateral row, though, owing to the upper surface being very convex, this is less conspicuous than in S. spinosissimus and S. fasciatus. Scutes of the body with radiating lines of well-developed spines, and each with a stronger flattened one in the centre. On the anterior portion of the body and sides these central spines are higher than broad and_ widely separated, but before the dorsal on the mid-line they become broader ; on the tail, especially along the median superior and inferior lines, they are much broader than high, and are arranged so closely together as to form an almost continuous keel. The whole head and space before the pectorals is covered with uniform upstanding spines which are arranged in radiating lines on the opercles. The last thirty tail rings are prehensile and are provided with fleshy excrescences on their inferior surfaces. Total length, 300 mm. One specimen from 37 fathoms off Flinders Island, South Australia, August 30th, 1909. This species is easily distinguished from the others by its broad snout and very thick tail, and also by the form of the scutes. The following is a key to the Australian species :-— a. Lateral row of scutes extending along the sides of the tail, not merging into the upper row. b. Scutes rugose but with scarcely any spines :— hardwicki. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. ; 20 aa. Lateral row of scutes merging into those on the upper edge of the tail behind the dorsal fin. c. Depth of the tail behind the dorsal 4 or more in the base of that fin. Depth of snout 6 or more in its length. d. Scutes intensely spiny and convex :—spinosissimus. dd. Scutes rugose with one spine and flatter :— fasciatus. cc. Depth of the tail behind the dorsal about 3 in the base of that fin. Depth of snout 5 in its length. e. Scutes with rows of spines and little convex :— robustus. GENus Hippocampus, Rafinesque. HippocAMPUS ABDOMINALIS, Lesson. (Plate vi., figemu) Hippocampus abdominalis, Lesson in Ferussac, Bull. Sci. Nati xl. erO2 7 pe et27; td. Gunehers Brit.) Mus. Cat: Fish., viii., 1870, p. 199; id., Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Ixxx., i., p. 420; 1d., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), p. 135; id-, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Nisa Noy skoo7,.p. 16sntdemloc. cit. TOM. ps 175. pl. xxviii. ; id.. Duncker, Faun. Siidwest-Austr. ii., 1909, P24 7- The specimen figured is a very large one from Merimbula, near Twofold Bay, New South Wales, where this species is. said to be common. It is recorded from New Zealand, Tas- mania and Victoria, while Gunther records a specimen in the British Museum from Sydney which was presented by Sir John Richardson. If this specimen really came from Port Jackson the species must be very rare here, as it has not been included in any of the catalogues of New South Wales fishes, nor have any local specimens come under my notice. HIPPOCAMPUS GRACILIFORMIS, Sp. nov. (Plate-vi., figemen} Din 27 coke LO INI Ss h2) =} 452 Body slender, its greatest depth being only 1°5 the width behind the pectorals. Tail nearly twice as long as the dis- tance between the tip of the coronet and the vent. Snout very short and thick, as long as the postorbital portion of the head. Eye 12 in the snout. Supra-orbital spines low and triangular, converging before the eyes where they form a prominent keel on the proximal portion of the snout. Behind the eyes the profile extends obliquely upwards to just before 30 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. the coronet where it is notched. The coronet is quadrangular with very indistinct tubercles and ridges. Tubercles of the body almost uniformly obtuse, the lateral row a little more developed than the others; below the dorsal fin those of the back are somewhat enlarged. On the tail the fifth, ninth and twelfth are prominent. None of the tubercles bear filaments. The dorsal fin stands on four body and three tail rings; its- anterior portion is damaged but it appears to have had twenty-seven rays. Colour.—Light brown, the tail with nine darker cross- bands. The head has large scattered dark spots arranged around the eye and on the snout, and there are others on the sides and under surfaces of the anterior portion of the body. Total length 87 mm. One specimen taken somewhere near Bass Strait, but the exact locality is unknown. The large number of rays in the dorsal fin distinguishes this from all other Australian species except H. abdominalis, Lesson. From that species it is easily separated by its slender body, the form of the supraocular spines and coronet, and the poor development of the tubercles. Famity SCOMBRESOCID. GENUS SCOMBRESOX, Lacepede. SCOMBRESOX FORSTERI, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Scombresox forsteri, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., xvili., 1846, p. 481. A single specimen was taken in a landing net at night, one hundred and twenty miles south-south-west of St. Francis Island, South Australia. Famity EXOCCETIDAS. GeNuS Exonautes, Jordan and Evermann. EXONAUTES SPECULIGER, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Flying Fish. Exoceetus speculiger, Cuvier and Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poissa. XIx.,, 1526, (p: 194k Cypsilurus speculiger, Jordan and Seale, Bull. U.S. Bur. Hisht, xxv.,.1905 (1906)*ipa zoo, fig. 13" A single specimen agreeing perfectly with the descriptions and figure quoted was obtained between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 31 Famity ATHERINIDA. GENUS ATHERINA, Linneus. ATHERINA DANNEVIGI, sp. nov. (Plate xvi., fig. 2.) Dee vintsine i en Ae i: Seales 173-75: <2=03. Meet o=TA cat Ni 1.) Ge edie Body very elongate, the depth 6’5 to 7°3 in the length to the hypural. Head 4 to 4°3. Eye 3 to 3% in the head, equal to or longer than the snout. Mouth oblique, not very large, the gape reaching almost to the anterior orbital rim; maxillary continued backwards to below the anterior third of the eye. The teeth are exceedingly minute and appear to be present on the jaws, vomer and palatines. Gill-rakers slender, equal to about half the length of the eve, sixteen on the lower limb of the first arch. Upper surface of the head flat, the interorbital width equal to the diameter of the eye. Muciferous system well developed, with large open pores. A row of about nine commences on the snout and extends over the eye, then downwards and along the upper margin of the opercles. Nine more are arranged from behind the eye, around the angle of the preoperculum to the mouth, where they join another row running along the margin of the preorbital. Five more pores are found along each ramus of the lower jaw. Scales extending forwards on the back as far as the hinder portion of the eye, and there are about thirty-nine along the mid-line of the back to the first dorsal, and twenty-four between the two dorsals. Those on the sides of the body are rounded but for a small median lobe which gives them an angular appearance. ‘There are three rows on the cheeks and about seven on the operculum. They also extend well onto the base of the caudal fin. Origin of the first dorsal behind the ventrals but well before the middle of the distance between the tip of the snout and the base of the tail; second spine longest, equal to two-thirds or more of the space between the tip of the snout and the hinder orbital margin. Soft dorsal commencing over the first third of the anal, its third ray a trifle shorter than the longest spines. Anal similar to the soft dorsal but with a longer base. Origin of ventrals almost midway between the snout and the end of the anal, or a little nearer the latter. Pectorals reaching to above the base of the ventrals. Vent between the ventrals and rather nearer their tips than their bases. Colour.—Sandy yellow (in formalin), each scale of the back margined with a row of minute brown dots. A silver 32 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS band, which is rather wider than the row of scales it covers, is uniformly dotted with minute brown specks, and may or may not be defined by a black line above. Occiput darker. Described from three specimens 75 to 85 mm. long from two stations—Spencer’s Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms, and the entrance to Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Selected type 75 mm. long from the latter locality. This is distinguished from all other Australian species by its very small scales. It is apparently nearest to A. hep- setoides, Richardson,! but the description of that species 1s so imperfect I am unable to compare it satisfactorily. Richardson, however, compared his species with A. hepsetus, Linn., to which, as his name denotes, he considered it very similar. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens are so very different in appearance from the latter that I have little doubt they are distinct from Richardson’s species also, and this, together with the fact that they come from somewhat deep water induces me to describe them as new. GENUS TA:NIOMEMBRAS, Ogilby. T@niomembras, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxiii. 1898, p. 41. Ogilby has erected this genus for Atherina microstoma, Gunther, considering that it differs from Atherina by (1) its more elongate body, (2) pointed snout, (3) small mouth, (4) stronger dentition, (5) shorter, stouter and fewer gill-rakers. I regard 1, 2 and q as being of specific value only, but 3 and 5 may perhaps be conveniently used to split up the large number of Australian species of Atherina. Notwithstanding Ginther’s statement, ‘‘teeth conspicuous in the jaws and on the vomer,’’ Ogilby describes the latter as smooth, while he finds a single row on the palatines. These are lacking in the specimens described below, but the vomerine teeth are well developed. ‘TENIOMEMBRAS MICROSTOMA, Giinther. (Plate xe. 2.) Atherina microstoma, Ginther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii.,. 1861, p. 401; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, Vi.; Loot, p. 395 2d., Johnston, Proc. Roy. /Soc.)iasm., 1882 (1883), p. 122, and 1890 (1891), p. 34. Br. (627.5 (D-ewi.-vil. 10-DT seaeeti-12 5 P. raotae Wie Bi oe C207; sc. lat 38-40; Sc. trae: 1 Richardson—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., xi. (1), 1843, p. 178. SE ee Ee ay 23 Height of the body 52-7, length of the head 4-44 in the length to the hypural. Eye 3, a little wider than the inter- orbital space, snout 44 in the head. Depth of the caudal peduncle a little less than the width of the eye. Body moderately elongate, somewhat compressed, its breadth equal to about two-thirds of its height. Head flat above with a series of very large pores extending from the snout, over the eye, to a canal above the operculum. A second series crosses the snout in front of the eye and follows the preorbital, joining another which extends around the margins of the preoperculum. There is a series on each ramus of the lower jaw, and a single pore behind the eye. A few large scales on the upper surface of the head extending forward to the eyes, snout and preorbital region bare. A single row of large scales on the cheek, and three rows on the operculum; a single row on the sub- and interoperculum. Mouth small, the maxillary not reaching the anterior margin of the eye; jaws subequal. Teeth minute but distinct, in several rows on the anterior parts of both jaws, none on the sides; a well-developed patch on the vomer, palatines tooth- less. Gill-rakers short and stout, the longest less than a third the length of the eye; about fifteen on the first arch. Scales of the body large, cycloid and concentrically striated. There are thirty-eight to forty on the silvery lateral band from behind the base of the pectoral to the hypural, and eight in a transverse series not counting the median ones on the back and belly. There are fourteen to fifteen between the nape and the first dorsal fin. Origin of the dorsal a little behind that of the ventrals, and a little nearer the end of the snout than the hypural. The spines are very weak and flexible, the second and third the longest, subequal, and about half as long again as the eye. The distance between the first spines of the two dorsals equals that between the end of the second and the hypural. Anal originating well in advance of the second dorsal, the length of its base once and a half in its distance from the hypural. Margins of the pectorals rounded, the second and third upper rays the longest, not quite reaching the vertical of the ventrals. Ventrals reaching back a little more than half their distance from the anal, the vent placed between their tips. Colour.—Whitish in formalin with a broad dark silvery lateral band along the fourth row of scales. The upper parts of the head and back are densely spotted with minute olive green dots, which also border the scales of the body above the lateral band and sometimes those below it as well. All the fins with more or less numerous scattered dots on the rays. 34 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Described from five specimens, about 63 mm. long, taken in the estuary of the Derwent River, Tasmania, by Mr. E. F. Lovett, who presented them to the Australian Museum. Two other very battered specimens are in the ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection from Storm Bay, Tasmania. They differ from Gunther’s description only in being rather more slender, in having one ray less in the anal fin, and in the position of the silvery lateral band, but I do not regard any of these as being of much importance. Famity STROMATEIDA. GENUS SERIOLELLA, Guichenot. SERIOLELLA BRAMA, Giinther. Snotgall Trevally, Trevalla. (Plate 1x yiies 1.) Neptonemus brama, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., ii., 1860, p:! 390;)7¢d-5) Johnston, (Proce Roy. Soc, asm.) s1s82 (1883), pp. 85 and 120. Neptonemus? travale, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i., LO72 5p los Seriolella brama, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), x., 1902, Pp. 1295102, Waite, Ree!?Cantb, Muss,/1-. 1911.) 9.82295 pls: Notwithstanding the numerous differences appearing in the two descriptions of S. brama and S. trevale, | agree with Regan that they represent but one species. I think there can be no doubt that my specimens are correctly identified with S. brama, while the fact that they were recognised as the common trevalla or trevally of the Melbourne markets by Mr. Dannevig bears out their association with S. trevale which was originally obtained from that source. I have examined over a dozen specimens from various localities extending from Tasmania to Port Jackson and find the variation in the number of fin-rays and spines to be con- siderable, as the following selected examples will show :— (i) Der wais, oi.) 30';A., ii., se2nmbered-.) (2) 1) avi iigyesia rine Hines set.) (3) Di vil. ue eoreA- Pil. 2p 5 Ps eon (Aaa ii. 32; A. ill. 23; P. 20. The lengths of the spines before the second dorsal are very variable, and the second may be replaced by a jointed ray. The disagreement in the propor- tions of the head and body, as given by the two authors, is doubtless accounted for by a different system of measuring adopted by each. The depth in my specimens is about 2°6 in the length to the hypural and 3°4 in that to the tip of the tail. The only other important difference is in the armature of FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 35 the preoperculum, as described by Castelnau, but I find this to be a very unreliable character, some specimens having the ridges and denticulations distinctly, though feebly, developed, while in others there is no trace of them. The following description is drawn up from all the material available to me :— DO Vi=Vily i.-t. 820-3300 0A. lil. vemeass Bs 20-27) Vi t5 5 C. 17; 1. lat. about 90. Depth 2°6, head 34 to 34, pectoral 3 to 3°4, base of dorsal 1°7, base of anal 3 to 3°2 in length to the hypural. Caudal peduncle 3'5. Eye-opening 4 to 4°5. Vertical diameter of orbit 3°4 to 4 in the head. Body compressed, rather deep, its dorsal and ventral pro- files almost equally arched, covered with moderate cycloid scales, those of the lateral line somewhat smaller than the others. Caudal peduncle narrow. Whole upper surface and sides of the head covered with a thick fleshy skin which largely hides the scales and other characters beneath it. Snout tumid, the nostrils placed close together and nearer the end of the snout than the eye, the anterior the largest and rounded, the posterior slit-like. Mouth oblique, maxillary small and weak, and reaching to or a little beyond the vertical of the anterior margin of the eye. Preorbital narrow, its margin smooth or crenulated. Eye large, placed in the middle line of the head. Bones of the head very weak, their margins either feebly denticulated or smooth; posterior margin of the preoperculum emarginate, the angle produced and broadly rounded. Oper- culum terminating in a very thin flat point margined with skin. Teeth extremely fine and small, arranged in a single row on each jaw; vomer, palatines and tongue toothless. Dorsal fin commencing a little before, over, or behind the base of the pectoral; the spinous portion is low and the middle spines the longest. If present, the second spine of the second dorsal is generally higher than any of those of the first; the second and third rays are the longest and about as long as the distance between the tip of the snout and the hinder margin of the eye. The two first spines of the anal are short and thick and somewhat detached from the rest of the fin; third spine longer and weaker and adpressed to the first ray. Soft portion of the fin similar to, but lower than, the second dorsal. Pectoral falcate reaching to or beyond the vertical of the first anal ray. Ventrals rather small, placed below the posterior base of the pectorals, and reaching about two-thirds of the distance between their insertion and the vent. Caudal deeply forked. Colour.—Body with large somewhat irregular blotches dis- tributed over its upper half, of which the most conspicuous is a 36 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. dark rounded one at the origin of the lateral line. Two large and less distinct marks descend from the origin and middle of the second dorsal to below the lateral line, and besides these there are numerous smaller markings scattered over the body. These markings have not been noted by Castelnau, whose description was prepared from fresh specimens, and as all mine have lost most of their scales it may be that they are not shown or are indistinct in perfect examples. A dark bar extends vertically across the eye which is otherwise golden. Dorsal, anal, pectorals and ventrals dusky, especially towards their margins. Fifteen specimens were preserved from the following localities :— Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms. Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. Oyster Bay, Tasmania. SERIOLELLA PUNCTATA, Forster. (Plate: x. teat. ) Gasterosteus punctatus, Forster, in Bloch and Schneider, Syst. [chthe. reo, ‘p. 36: Neptonemus bilineatus, Hutton, Trans. N. Zeal. Inst., v., RO7Z2— (P- e20leupla Vall. Seriolella bilineata, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), x., 1902, .P-, 120: Seriolella punctata, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., i., 1911, p. 231, pl. li. Di ivi--vils 34-39; A. ii. 22-24 eee 2o0-22— Vou. 55°C. 17: Depth 3°3 to 4, head 3°4 to 3°6, pectoral about 4, base of dorsal 1°7, and base of anal 3°8 in the length to the hypural. Caudal peduncle 4 to 4°5, eye-opening 4°8 to 55, vertical diameter of the orbit 3°4 to 3°8 in the head. Body compressed, elongate, the dorsal and ventral profiles evenly arched, upper parts covered with large pores. Caudal peduncle narrow. Upper surface and sides of the head covered with a thick fleshy porous skin which hides the scales and other characters beneath it. Snout somewhat fleshy and rounded. Nostrils close together, nearer the tip of the snout than the eye; the posterior longer than the anterior which is round. Mouth oblique; maxillary rather narrow and weak, FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 27, extending to or beyond the vertical of the anterior margin of the eye. Preorbital narrow. Eye moderate, placed a little above the mid-line of the head. Opercular bones very weak, and with smooth margins in all my specimens, but they are doubtless subject to the same variation as in S. brama. Posterior margin of the preoperculum oblique and usually a little emarginate, the angle produced and broadly rounded; operculum terminating in a very thin flat point margined with skin. Dorsal fin commencing a little behind the vertical of the base of the pectoral; the spinous portion is low and the middle spines are the longest. The third or fourth rays are the longest, but are shorter than the distance between the tip of the snout and the hinder margin of the eye. The two first spines of the anal are very small and more or less hidden in the skin; the third is longer and adpressed to the first ray. Soft portion of the fin similar to, but lower than that of the dorsal. Pectoral falcate not nearly reaching the vertical of the vent. Ventrals small, inserted just behind the pectorals and reaching one-third or more of the distance between them and the anal. Caudal forked. Colour.—Body with numerous small round spots along the middle line, and a large dark mark behind the head, near the base of the lateral line, which is deeper than broad. A dark vertical bar across the eye. Pectorals, dorsal and anal fins dusky, especially towards their margins. Ventrals and caudal lighter. Longest specimen 280 mm. Seriolella porosa, Guichenot,! is said to differ from S. punctata in being more slender, the depth being 4 to 44 in the length as against 33 to 33. The original figure of that species, however, agrees very well in this respett with my specimens of S. punctata. Regan* considers the Tasmanian S. dobula, Gunther, to be synonymous with S. porosa, and I think it possible that both will prove to be merely variations of Forster’s species, though I have seen no specimens in which the depth is 44 in the length as described by Gunther. Two specimens were preserved which were taken between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms, and seven others from the Victorian coast and from Oyster Bay, Tasmania. 1 Guichenot in Gay—Fauna Ohilena, Pisces, 1847, p. 238; Atlas ii., Ichth. pistvil-; Le) 2: 2 Regan—Ann. Mag. Nat Hist. (7), x., 1902, p. 128. 38 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Famity GADIDA. GeENnuS PuysIcuLus, Kaup. PHYSICULUS BARBATUS, Giinther. Rock Cod, Cape Cod, Red Cod. Pseudophycis barbatus, Gunther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (3), XI, 1663, p. 116; id., Gastelnau, Proc. Zool.-Acclim. SoCs Vict, 1872, p.mio2;-id.. (McCoys Jerodry Zool: Vict ppl xx.)31578; tdee|ohnston, Proc: Royse soc: Tasm., 1882 (1883), pp. 88 and 126. Physiculus palmatus, Klunzinger, Arch. fur. Naturg., XK ielo7e. Pp. 3o: Lotella grandis, Ramsay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v 1881, p. 462. Physiculus barbatus, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, 1904, p. 24. Only one specimen of this common southern species was preserved. It is fifteen inches long and was obtained off Cape Everard, Victoria, in 70 fathoms. There seems to ine little doubt that P. pialmoalns Klunzinger, from Hobson’s Bay, Port Phillip, is identical with the common Victorian Rock Cod since the description agrees perfectly with that given by McCoy of the latter species. The fact that Klunzinger compared his fish with P. breviusculus, Richard- son, only, indicates that he was unaware of Gunther’s species. wt i Famity MACROURID. GENUS CGLORHYNCHUS, Guiorna. Cc:LORHYNCHUS AUSTRALIS, Richardson. Lepidoleprus australis, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., ae p. 100, and Trans. Zool. Soc., m., 1849, p. 151, pl. Vill. ree ae ; Macrurus australis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., iv., 1862, Pp: 301; 1d.4 Johnston, Proce, Roy. Soc, Lasm., 1982 (1883), p. 127; id., Giinther, Chall. Rept., Zool., xxii., 1807. Pp. '27. Celorhynchus mortoni, Ogilby, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1896 (1897), p- 83. ; Ceelorhynchus australis, Waite, Rec. Cantb. Mus., 1., 1911, Boul] Zane ys pl. XXUKS neal When recording Optonurus denticulatus from New South Wales I noted! that several specimens lacked the ends-of their 1 McCulloch—Rec. Austr. Mus., vi., 1907, p. 346. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 39 tails, and that in one the dorsal and anal fins had grown together around the injured portion, thereby giving it the appearance of being perfect. Many examples of C. australis in the ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection exhibit this same peculiarity, some having the tail so truncated and the anal rays so com- plete around it that they almost seem to have heterocercal instead of leptocercal tails. Dissection shows that the injured vertebra spreads out into a cartilaginous fan somewhat resembling a true hypural bone, to which the rays are movably articulated. A large series of specimens, seventy-five in number, con- clusively proves that C. mortoni, Ogilby (the type specimen of which is lost), is identical with Richardson’s species, and that the differences noted between the two are nearly all due to the one having a more perfect and therefore longer tail than the other. The only character that cannot be so explained lies in the armature of the scales, Ogilby counting 18 to 23 ridges in C. mortoni, while C. australis is said to have 12 to 18 only. I find that the number varies according to the size of the specimens, my smallest having only six ridges, whereas a large scale in a big example has twenty-two. When fresh, the specimens were greyish with darker bands extending along the body and occupying the overlapping por- tions of each row of scales. There is a more or less distinct dark band between the eyes, and the operculum is blackish. Upper half of the first dorsal black with a lighter margin. Anal dark with a white border. Pectorals and ventrals dusky with lighter edges. Specimens were preserved from off Storm Bay, Tasmania, 60 fathoms, and from Oyster Bay, Tasmania. FaMiLty BERYCIDA:. GENUS AUSTROBERYX, gen. nov. Body rather deep, compressed, covered with moderately large, ctenoid scales which are regularly arranged. Abdomen trenchant, with a row of slightly enlarged, keeled scales. Head large, with thin bones and high ridges which have deep muciferous cavities between them; the exposed bones rough with raised striz. Snout short, mouth oblique, the chin prominent. Eye large. Jaws, vomer and palatines with villiform teeth. Opercles serrated ; operculm with two spines, preoperculum with more or less strongly developed spines on its inner border. Dorsal with six or seven spines which in- crease regularly in height, and eleven to fourteen soft rays. Anal with four spines and twelve to fourteen rays, its base shorter than that of the dorsal. Ventrals with one spine and seven rays. 40 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS Type Beryx affinis, Gunther. B. gerrardi, Gunther, and B_ lineatus, Cuvier and Valenciennes, also belong to this genus. They are distinguished from Beryx, Cuvier (type B. decadactylus, Cuv. and Val.), by having the anal shorter than the dorsal and composed of only 12-14 rays instead of 26-30. The bones of the head also appear to be more strongly armed, and the suborbitals are broader. Regan! has placed Beryx affinis, Gunther, and its allies in the genus Hoplopteryx, Agassiz?, of which most of the species are Cretaceous fossils. Judging from Woodward's restoration of H. lewesiensis,3 Mantell, however, the recent forms seem to differ in having the opercular bones more strongly armed and in having much smaller scales. Note on the genera Trachichthys, Shaw and Nodder, and Hoplostethus, Cuvier and Valenciennes.—It would seem that Trachichthys (type T. australis, Shaw & Nodder) is a mono- typic genus characterised by having three dorsal and two anal spines which are placed close together, and, like the rays, are entirely covered with minute asperities. Minute tuberculiform teeth are crowded on the jaws, vomer and palatines. Gunther‘ counted three spines and twelve rays in the dorsal, and two spines and ten rays in the anal of the type specimen Obi. vadstvalis: McCoy® describes iv./11 and iii./g (10) respectively, but has mistaken the anterior rays for spines, while Waite® expressly states that there are three and not two anal spines in Trachichthys. I have counted nine specimens of T. australis, and find the number of spines and rays to be as stated by Gunther. Boulenger’ has united Hoplostethus with Trachichthys, re- garding some Australian and New Zealand species (T. inter- medius, Hector, and T. elongatus, Gunther) as intermediate between the two. Both these fishes, however, bear little resemblance to T. australis, haying four and six dorsal spines and three anal spines which are well separated, and which, together with the rays, are not covered with minute asperities. They are much nearer to Hoplostethus (type H. mediter- vaneus, Cuv. & Val.), but both differ from that genus, as 2 Agassiz—Poiss. Foss., iv., 1838, p. 4. 3 Woodward—Brit. Mus. Cat. Foss. Fish., iv., 1901, p. 398, fig. 31. 4 Gunther—Cat. Fish. Brit. Mus., i., 1859, p. 10. 5 McCoy—Prodr. Zool. Vict., 1886, pl. cxiv. 6 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 66. 7 Boulenger—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), ix., 1902, p. 202. 8 Jordan & Fowler—Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxvi., 1902, p. 7. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 41 vomerine teeth, while T. elongatus also has only four instead of six dorsal spines. In all other respects, however, they agree with Hoplostethus, T. intermedius indeed being very closely allied to H. mediterraneus, so that I think it better to expand the limits of that genus to include them rather than form an unnatural group by uniting Hoplostethus and Tra- chichthys. AUSTROBERYX GERRARDI. Giinther. (Plate viii.). Beryx "Gerrardt, (Gunther, Ann. Mage Nat. THuist:) (5), xx, 1887, p. 238, fig. BEmocw OY Viena nA. ive, 12-1 Jemeaeiar Ws 15. 7s. Gs l. lat. 36-39; 1. tr. 6 + 11. Height 118-2, head 24-22 in the length to the hypural. Eye 24 in the head. Interorbital width slightly less than % of the eye, and equal to the length of the snout. Base of the anal 2 that of the dorsal which equals the length of the head. Caudal peduncle # of the eye and almost equal to the post-orbital portion of the head. Body short and deep. Upper profile very convex from the snout to the first dorsal spine which marks its highest point. The curve from the snout to the ventral fin is much less than that of the back; the line between the ventrals and the anal is straight and bears 9-11 keeled scales which decrease in size backwards. Maxillary reaching to below the posterior third of the eye, stiliform anteriorly but very broad behind; there is a small rough patch of spines on the narrow portion which is in con- tact with the supplemental bone, but the rest is smooth. Supplemental bone with numerous ridges each ending in spines. Turbinal bones bilobed and margined with sharp spines. Preorbital denticulated, without a curved spine but with a slight notch at its upper end to receive a blunt spine projecting from the maxillary. Bones of the infraorbital arch spine-like and roughened. Interorbital space narrowest above the middle of the eye, becoming a little wider forwards, then narrowing again towards the nostrils. Supraciliary edges finely denticulated, terminating anteriorly above the nostrils; between these are two curved, slightly roughened ridges which approach each other at either end and enclose a some- what elliptical area, with truncate ends, which is 34-4 times as long as broad. Above the first third of the eye these ridges each give off a branch which again divides and passes back- wards ending in some rather strong spines some distance before the suprascapular. Preoperculum with two parallel margins, the hinder borders of which are serrated ; the angle of the inner margin is formed 42 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. of two flattened, denticulated spines, while that of the outer is armed with smaller simple spines. Both lower borders. finely denticulated. Operculum narrow, its anterior half covered with scales, the posterior portion with coarse striz ending in marginal points; two strong spines on the upper portion of the bone. Subopercle with one or two small spines at its lowest point. Interoperculum with a broad notch near its junction with the subopercle, its angle and lower border striated and finely denticulated. Margin of the suprascapular denticulated, its lower portion with an oblique ridge terminat- ing in some enlarged spines. Nostrils more widely separated than in A. affinis, the hinder ones being very close to the orbital margins. First bran- chiostegals very slender, second to fifth broad and denti- culated below, the others smooth. Gill-rakers very long and slender posteriorly, about half as long as the eye; twenty-two on the lower limb of the first arch. Exceedingly fine villiform teeth on the jaws without larger ones near the middle. A small triangular patch on the vomer and a long cuneiform band on each palatine bone. With the exception of the form of the ridges on top of the head, the position of the nostrils and the absence of enlarged teeth, all the characters of the head are almost exactly similar to those of young A. affints. Dorsal spines gradually increasing in length, the last 14-14 as long as the eye and 2 the length of the second ray; all are more or less angular and striated. Second ray the longest, about 24 as long as the last. The first anal spine is placed below the third dorsal ray, the fourth equals the fifth dorsal spine in length and is about # as long as the second ray; the last ray is placed far behind that of the dorsal. Pectoral not quite ? in the head and reaching to above the base of the anterior anal rays. Ventrals with strong, flattened, striated spines, 3 as long as the rays which extend to the base of the fourth anal spine. Caudal deeply forked, the lobes somewhat pointed and about equal to the head in length. All the scales rather coarsely denticulated, the external half of their exposed surfaces with smooth ridges ending in mar- ginal teeth. Bases of the dorsal and anal fins protected by sheaths formed of several rows of scales, the outermost of which is the largest. A small patch of scales on the cheeks. A large angular scale at the axil of the ventral fin. Lateral line straight, each scale with a median excavation. Colourless in formalin. Described from twelve specimens, 150-200 mm. in length. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 43 This species is distinguished from A. affinis and A. lineatus by its small number of scales on the lateral line, different fin formulz and by its short and deep form. Trawled in 37 fathoms off Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia. AUSTROBERYX AFFINIS, Giinther. Nanny gai. (Bites oa 1.) Beryx affinis, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i., 1859, p. 13; and Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xx., 1887, p. 238, fig. ; id., Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, p. 60, pl. xxi. ; id., Stead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 48, pl. xvii. Hoplopteryx affinis, Regan, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8), vii., Piss el): This species is extremely variable with age, the young being short bodied and round, and the depth only 22 in the total length, while large specimens are much more elongate with the depth 34. The form and armature of the bones of the head is essentially the same in both, but those of the young have much more spinate edges, and their surfaces are smooth and with but few ridges. The same remarks apply to the ms a7 iG 4 OBB "SRE. FIG. 11. scales which have very coarsely denticulated edges and almost smooth surfaces; in the adult the denticulations are much finer and they are continued back as ridges almost half way across the exposed portions of the scales. The accompanying figure represents my smallest specimen (7o mm. long). 44 “ENDEAVOUR” SOIENTIFIC RESULTS. Constant characters appear to be afforded by the number of spines and rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and the number of perforated scales along the lateral line. In nine examples 23-16 inches long, I find them to be as follows :—D. vii./11-12, A. iv./12, lateral line 42-44. Gunther has stated that the length of the head equals the height of the body. As this character has been used in com- parison with other species, it is worth noting that it is con- siderably shorter in all the specimens I have seen, and is shown to be so in all the figures published. Only three specimens were preserved in the ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection which came from the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, and sixty miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms. GENUS PARATRACHICHTHYS, Waite. PARATRACHICHTHYS TRAILLI, Hutton.. Paratrachichthys trailli, Hutton—Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 65. Waite noted that the number and form of the abdominal scutes of his single specimen differed slightly from the des- criptions and figure of Tvachichthys macleayi, Johnston, and T. trailli, Hutton. In the ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens I find from twelve to sixteen scutes, and the first either divided or single, and with one median or two lateral spines. This, therefore, proves the identity of T. macleay: with Hutton’s species. Referring to the vomerine teeth, Waite states that the patch could be covered by a pin’s head. This agrees well with most of my specimens, but in others they are entirely wanting. The collection includes seventeen specimens from off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms, and Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Famity MONOCENTRID/. GENUS Monocentris, Bloch and Schneider. MONOCENTRIS GLORIA-MARIS, de Vis. Knight Fish. Monocentris gloria-maris (de Vis.)—Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p. 67, pl. vili., figs. 1-2, and Rec. Austr. Mims: Vi... 1905,,p. GO: Two specimens were obtained fifteen miles off Saddle Hill, New South Wales, in 35 fathoms. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. FaMILy PEMPHERID. GENUS PEMPHERIS, Cuvier. PEMPHERIS MULTIRADIATA, Klunzinger. Pempheris multiradiatus, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. VER px. Iw rOZO. p.. 3S1. Pempheris macrolepis, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 516; id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., IV LOGO, Ps 735. Plax Pempheris lineatus, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, x., 1886, p. 447. Having carefully examined all the material at my disposal, I have no doubt that P. multiradiata is identical with P. macrolepis, as has been suggested by Macleay.1 Klunzinger’s description agrees exactly with my specimens which come from various localities between the Bellinger River, New South Wales, and Kingston, South Australia. In twelve examples I find the following number of fin-rays and scales :-— D. v./11-13, A. i1./32-38, lateral line to the hypural 46-so. Waite (loc. cit.) has suggested that P. multiradiata is identical with P. compressa, Shaw, but I can see no reason for this conclusion. The former has most of its scales cycloid, only those on the anterior and lower portion of the head, breast, and on the back before the dorsal fin being ctenoid. In P. compressa all are very distinctly ctenoid, and they are much smaller, there being 62-64 along the lateral line instead of only 46-50. The *‘Endeavour’’ specimens were taken at the following stations :— Off Bellengen, New South Wales, 40-52 fathoms. Between Port Stephens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island and north of Goose Island, Bass Strait. Forty miles off Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. PEMPHERIS AFFINIS, sp. nov. (Plate vii., Fig. 1.) De yepplO-Lin Aamo; P. 16a 62 °C. rei lat: 60-62; |. tr. 7 + 19. Depth 23-23, head 33-34 in the length to the hypural. Eye 2-2} in the head; interorbital width 14- 1} in the eye and about twice as wide as the snout is long. Depth of caudal peduncle # of the eye. 1 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884. p. 21 46 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Body rather deep; the profile arched to the first dorsal, thence straight to the tail. Lower profile forming an even curve to the origin of the anal, the base of which is very oblique. Interorbital space convex. Maxilla reaching to slightly behind the middle of the eye, and covered with large, rough ctenoid scales. Preoperculum with a very strong spine at the angle and one or two weaker ones on each border. Operculum with two very small flat points separated by a broad excavation ; above and close to the upper one are several small points which may be indistinct. Whole head, with the exception of the tip of the snout and the lips, covered with moderately large scales which are mostly cycloid, only those of the preorbital and lower portion of the head being ctenoid. Upper jaw with an outer row of large canines which increase in size as they approach the median toothless excavation; anteriorly there is an inner row of smaller teeth behind them. Lower jaw with a few large teeth directed outwards anteriorly, and two rows of smaller teeth along the sides which become united into one about half way back. A row of small conical teeth is present on each side of the vomer, and still smaller ones form bands on the palatines. Posterior gill-rakers long and slender, more than one-third the length of the eye; there are twenty-three on the lower limb of the first arch. On the back, in front of the dorsal fin, and also on the ventral surface, except on the bases of and between the ven- trals, the scales are extremely rough and ctenoid; their edges are turned obliquely outwards from the body, and they are firm and adherent. The rest of the body is covered with large, flat, cycloid scales which are only marked with very fine con- centric striz, and are very deciduous. ‘The lateral line is continued to the end of the middle caudal rays, and has 60-62 scales as far as the hypural and fifteen more to the end. The exposed portion of each scale is smooth and smaller than those on either side of it, and the edges are broken both above and below the canal by small rounded indentations. Origin of the dorsal well behind the vertical of the ventral spine; the distance between it and the end of the snout is slightly less than half that between the same point and the end of the middle caudal rays. ‘The fifth spine is more than two-thirds the length of the second ray, which is equal to three-fourths or more of the length of the head. The base of the anal is 24 that of the dorsal, and its anterior rays are as long as the last dorsal spine; the first spine is placed below the last dorsal ray. Third pectoral ray the longest, reaching to above the fourth anal ray. Ventrals placed beneath the pectorals and reaching backwards to the vent. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 47 Colour.—Body everywhere closely speckled with minute red- ‘dish-brown dots which are more crowded on the back and head. Dorsal, caudal and ventrals tipped with black, while the anal also has a narrow black border. With the exception of these markings and some crowded dots on the anterior portion of the dorsal and on the caudal lobes, the fins are colourless. Described from four specimens 96-135 mm. long. Length of type (B. 7332) 135 mm. This species is very closely allied to P. multiradiata, but may be at once distinguished by its much smaller scales. It has also a somewhat different number of rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and the tail portion of the body is longer, while a good recognition character lies in the black tips to the fins. Three small specimens were taken by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ in thirteen fathoms off Nobby’s Head, Newcastle, New South Wales. A larger and somewhat better preserved example is in the Australian Museum collection from Port Jackson, and has been selected as the type. PEMPHERIS KLUNZINGERI, nom. nov. Pempheris miilleri, Klunzinger, Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Xxx O79, p. 1360, pl. vin (Mec smullert, Poey. 1860). Both Macleay! and Waite? have suggested that this species is identical with P. compressa, Shaw, but it appears to be distinguished by its much more elongate form, somewhat larger number of anal rays and smaller scales. I have counted eight specimens of P. compressa and find the number of fin-rays and scales to be as follows:—-D. vi./9-10, A. iii./ 35-38, lateral line to the hypural, 62-64. Klunzinger gives for the same in his species :—D. v./10, A. iii./39-40, lateral line 75. he different forms of the two species may be seen by comparing Klunzinger’s figure with that of Stead of P. com- pressa.4 The type came from King George’s Sound. It was not obtained by the ‘‘Endeavour,’’ nor have I seen any specimens. PEMPHERIS ELONGATA, Sp. nov. (Plate iv., Fig. 1.) De ive-Ven 10-82 Ami: 24-27) eel Ve tee S 5 Co 178 i. lat. 68-71; 1. tr. 8-9 + 18-20. Height 3:1 to 2°7 in the length to the hypural. Profile slightly arched to the dorsal fin, thence straight to the tail; lower profile considerably more curved than the upper one. Caudal peduncle narrow, ied inthe eye: 1 daciode Pree Linn. soe. N.S. ae ee 1884, p. ‘a. 2 Waite—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, 3 Shaw in White—Voy. N.S. Wales, fan a4 267, fig. 2a 4 Stead—Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 49, pl. xviii. 48 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Head 2°8 to 311 in the length. Orbit 2°4 in the head, much greater than the interorbital width which is rather more than one-fourth of the head, convex, and one-third longer than the snout. Operculum with two very weak spines which are almost hidden by scales. With the exception of the snout and lips the whole head is covered with small scales set in a fleshy skin, beneath which are numerous muciferous canals with small pores opening onto the surface. Teeth minute, in a single row on the jaws and in very narrow bands or almost single rows on the vomer and palatines. Median portion of the scales of the body more or less pro- duced and usually with several microscopic points which are variable both in number and degree of development. There are from sixty-eight to seventy-one scales along the lateral line to the hypural and about ten more extend onto the base of the caudal; they are enlarged, those of the anterior portion being almost twice as broad as long, and have either truncate or excavate spiny margins. Below the lateral line the scales are arranged in oblique rows which descend backwards towards the lower surface of the body. The distance between the origin of the dorsal and the end of the snout is usually somewhat less, sometimes rather more than half that between it and the tip of the caudal. The first spine may be either well developed, small or absent ; the others increase regularly in height, the last being about two-thirds the length of the first ray. The latter is simple and a little longer than the space between the end of the snout to the hinder orbital margin. The length of the base of the anal is 1°5 to 1°7 that of the dorsal; its anterior rays are much higher than the posterior ones, but are only two-thirds, or less, the length of the first dorsal ray. The first spine is placed either below the hindermost portion of the dorsal or entirely behind that fin and is often minute and hidden in the scales. Third upper ray of the pectoral the longest, reaching almost to or a little beyond the vertical of the anal. Ventrals placed below the pectorals and not reaching so far back as the vent. Colour.—Upper surface of the head, back and upper portion of the sides closely speckled with microscopic brown dots ' which give them a greyish colour. Breast, lower jaw and lips more or less similarly dotted, and the specks also-extend onto the dorsal and caudal rays. Otherwise colourless in preserved examples. Described from sixteen specimens go to 132 mm. long, the longest of which is selected as the type. This species is allied to P. unwini, Ogilby, but is at once distinguished by its much less spiny and more numerous FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 49 scales. The dorsal and anal fins also have several more rays each, but otherwise the two are very similar. The specimens were trawled off Flinders Island, Bass Strait, in 4o fathoms, and off Wilson’s Promontory, Victoria. The following key will serve to distinguish the Australian species of Pempheris :— a. Anal fin with more than 30 rays; body rather deep. b. Scales mostly cycloid, ctenoid anteriorly, deciduous. c. Seales large, 46-50 on lateral line (to the hypural) :— multivadiata. cc. Seales smaller, 60-62 on the lateral line:— — affinis. bb. Scales ctenoid, adherent. d. 62-64 scales on the lateral line :— compressa. dd. 75 scales on the lateral line :— klunzingert. -aa. Anal fin with less than 30 rays, body rather elongate. e. Edges of the scales with minute, irregular points, though scarcely ctenoid :— elongata. FaMILy SERRANIDZ.. GENUS EPINEPHELUS, Bloch. EPINEPHELUS SEPTEMFASCIATUS, Thunberg. Grey-banded Rock Cod. Plectropoma susuki, Giinther, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1867, p. 100. Epinephelus septemfasciatus, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 1., 1895, p- 226; :d., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., tv., 1899, p. 75; id., Jordan & Richardson, Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., XxXxXvii., 1910, p. 458. Jordan and Richardson have recently expressed the opinion that the Australian records of this species are probably in- correct. I have compared the specimen taken by the ‘“Thetis,’? another of unknown origin, and two in the ‘‘En- deavour’’ collection with the description given by these authors of Japanese specimens, and find that they differ in two small details only. None show the small patch of very fine scales near the tip of the maxillary, nor in any is the sixth band divided as described. Gunther stated, however, that the colouration of his Port Jackson specimens was as in that figured by Schlegel, so that, though I think it possible that the Australian fish represents a distinct subspecies, it is best to leave the matter open until examples from both localities can be compared. Two specimens trawled off the Clarence River, New South ‘Wales, in 26-30 fathoms. 50 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. GENUS HYPOPLECTRODES, Gill. HYPOPLECTRODES SEMICINCTA, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Half-banded Sea Perch. Gilbertia semicincta, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd diner OOK, Ps, 3075 A single specimen was preserved from six miles off Port Stephens, New South Wales, 43 fathoms. Genus Anrtuias, Bloch. Anthias, Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed., i., 1895, paegZo: A careful examination of fourteen specimens of A. pulchel- lus, Waite, shows that the differences between this genus and Cesioperca are very slight. Comparing the definitions of the two, as given by Boulenger (loc. cit., pp. 311 and 320), it appears that the only reliable differences between them are as follows :— Scales rough on the border, denticulated; tubes of the lateral line bifurcate, short. Dorsal with 19-23 rays. Anal with 9-10 rays :— Ce@sioperca.. Scales ciliated, smooth. ‘Tubes straight or with an ascend- ing tubule and) extending along nearly the entire scales. Dorsal with 14-18 rays. Anal with 6-8 rays :-— Anthias. In A. pulchellus I find the number of fin rays agrees with Anthias, while the characters of the scales are distinctly those: of Cesioperca. In the fourteen specimens the number of fin- rays and scales is as follows:—D. x./16-17; A. ui./8; P. 15-16; 1. lat. 41-45. My colleague, Mr. E. F. Hallmann, very kindly pre- pared microscopical mounts for me of the scales of Anthias pleurotenia, Bleeker, A. pulchellus, Waite, C@sioperca rasor, Rich., and C. lepidoplera, Forster. In the first-named only are they smooth with ciliated edges. Those of the other three have their borders roughened for varying distances FIG. 12. within the ciliated edges. In none do I find the tubes of the lateral line bifurcate, as stated by Boulenger, though they extend further across the scales in A. pleurotenia than in the: others. FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 51 It follows, therefore, that if A. pulchellus be admitted as a true Anthias, the differences in the number of fin-rays alone can be used to distinguish C@sioperca from that genus. ANTHIAS PULCHELLUS, Waite. (Fig. 12.) Anthias pulchellus, Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, Pi-7775) Dla xt Of eleven specimens preserved only three bear the black spot on the dorsal fin. They were obtained off Norah Head, New South Wales, in 65 fathoms, and 60 miles south of Cape Everard, Victoria, 60-70 fathoms. GENUS CALLANTHIAS, Lowe. CALLANTHIAS ALLPORTI, Giinther. Allport’s Perch. Callanthias allporti, Giinther, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (4), xvil., 1876, p. 390; id., Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd Cdr in mroOs ep. 335) pl. xvid Waite, Prelam. Rept. ppihetis; Exped’) 1898, p:331., pl: Callanthias platei, Boulenger, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7), iii, 1899, p- 346; id.. Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1899, p2co;td.. ibid. Rec: Austr. Mus.,w2; 1903, p. 56 (nec C. platei, Steindachner). Callanthias platei australis, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales; xxiv... 1899,°p: 173. In 1898 Waite (Prelim. Rept. ‘‘Thetis’’) recorded six speci- mens from the New South Wales coast as C. allporti, Gunther, but noted that they did not wholly agree with the published descriptions of that species. Boulenger (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.), with Gunther’s type before him, considered that Waite’s figure represented a distinct species and identified it with C. platei, Steindachner,! which had just been described from Juan Fernandez. Later, Ogilby (Proc: Linn Soc. N.S.W.), noting certain differences between Steindachner’s figure and the Australian fish, proposed to separate the latter under the varietal name australis, but this name was not adopted by Waite, who referred to it simply as C. platet (Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., and Rec. Austr. Mus., v.). With twenty-three specimens taken by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ and four others in the museum collection before me, I find that the ‘‘Thetis’’ specimens were correctly identified as C. allporti, and that C. platei australis is merely the young form 1 pond ennen nana Chilensis, Zool. Jahrb., Suppl., iv., 2, 1898, p. 284, plo xv: 52 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS of that species. C. allporti varies greatly with age both in the depth of the body and height of the vertical fins, so that Waite’s figure represents the half-grown fish about 200 mm. long, while that in the British Museum Catalogue is the figure of an adult specimen. Though closely approaching the figure of C. platei in its younger stages, C. allporti nevertheless appears to be dis- tinguished by its larger eye and higher vertical fins. The other characters used by Ogilby to differentiate the variety australis are dealt with below. My series includes specimens from less than five inches to others over eleven inches long, and they show that the body is much more slender in young individuals than in adults. The greatest depth in the smallest specimen is 3°21 in the length from the snout to the hypural, and it regularly increases with age until in the largest it is 2°66 in the same. The height of the vertical fins also varies with age, as well as individually. In the smallest specimen the longest anal rays are 7°3 in the above length, while a large example has them 5°04 in the same. In none are they so short as in the figure of C. platei which shows them to be about 8°3 in that length. The length of the head varies from 3°88 (young) to 4°61 (adult) in the length from the snout to the hypural. In his comparison of C. platei with C. p. australis, Ogilby’s figures show the head to be much smaller in the first-named. My specimens, however, and a comparison of Steindachner’s and Waite’s illustrations show that this difference is not so great as is indicated. The eye of the young is larger than that of the adult, being 2°77 as against 3 in. the leagtajot ‘the. head=a@heveve oteC: platei is proportionately smaller. The maxillary generally extends to below the anterior margin of the pupil, but in one specimen reaches almost to the middle of the eye. Ogilby’s counting of the fins and scales agrees with mine. Ogilby has erected the genus Anogramma for C. allporti regarding the strength of the vomerine teeth to be of generic importance. I have large specimens agreeing in every other way with the figure of C. allporti in which these are either small or absent, while others of the australis form have them well developed. Anogramma is therefore unnecessary. ’ The ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection includes forty-three specimens, most of which come from off Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Six were preserved from eleven miles east of Rarrenjoey Head, New South Wales, 40 fathoms. : FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 53 GENUS C4:SIOPERCA, Castelnau. C4ESIOPERCA RASOR, Richardson. Red Perch. Serranus rasor, Richardson, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1839, p- 95, and Trans. Zool: Soe:;\1i.; 1849; p2'73), pl: iv., fig. 1. Anthias rasor, Gunther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., i., 1859, p. 93; td-> Macleay Proc. ‘Linn. ‘Soc NtS: Wales, v.; 1881, Po oitwid.. johnston, -Broc. GRoys soc. Pasm:, 1882 (1883), p. Se ii. Lucas,’ Proc: ixoya soc: Vict., 2 ser. -, 1890, p. ee vasOYr, espinal Proc. Zooalksoc) Vict-, 1., 1872 p-. 49; 7d., Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd ed., 1895, P- 313- Anthias rasor var. extensus, Klunzinger, Arch. fur. Nat., WV is, O72, Pp. 17. ais Lo SSEG, ee , sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien, Ixxx , P- 339, pl. 1 epee: es Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., 2nd Cdr pa LoO sos 213. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ specimens show that the colour markings of this species are subject to great variation. The black mark on the side may be large or only moderately developed, or altogether absent. One specimen shows a large black spot on one side and none on the other, while in a second example it covers fifteen scales on the left side and two on the right. The blue bands around the eye and on the body are well developed in some and wanting in others. Having counted fifteen specimens I find the number of scales and fin-rays to be as follows:—D. x.-x1./19-22; A. ui./g-10; P. 14-15; V. Ser LS salvlat, 4o-s6. In separating his Anthias extensus from A. rasor, Klunzinger considered that it had a, more slender body, longer pectorals, smooth preorbital, and lacked the characteristic markings of Richardson’s species. The above notes prove that the latter character has no specific value, while Boulenger shows that the length of the pectorals does not differ in the two. Castel- nau described the preorbital as strongly ciliated, but in all my specimens it is either entire or somewhat crenulate, and therefore agrees with both Klunzinger’s and Richardson’s figures. I find that the depth of the body varies from 2°75 to 30 in the length to the hypural, so that but one character, the smaller scales, is left to distinguish extensus. Klunzinger counted 62-63 scales on the lateral line, but it seems that he included some unperforated ones on the base of the tail, as his figure, which is by that most accurate artist, Konopicky, shows only 58. 54 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Having disposed of these apparent differences I have ne hesitation in following Macleay! in uniting the two species. The ‘‘Endeavour”’ collection includes fifteen specimens from the following stations :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. Oyster Bay, Tasmania. Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. Five others are in the Australian Museum from Tasmania and South Australia. C4:SIOPERCA LEPIDOPTERA, Forster. Bastard Longfin. Cesioperca lepidoptera (Forster), Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. Bish endieds, 1.) 1805s pghe5 1d., Viale. brelim- swept. Uhetisqebxpeds, 1SQS, payer. ple. Though a large black spot on each side below the lateral line is characteristic of this species, yet some specimens in the collection show that it may occasionally be absent. Others also are marked with many small greenish spots which some- times form short, irregular lines, and may be so crowded on the upper parts as to darken them considerably, while still others show three yellow longitudinal bands along the sides below the lateral line. Twenty-two specimens were examined from the following localities :— Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms. Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 40 fathoms. Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 40-60 fathoms. Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. GENUS ENnopLosus, Lacepede ENOPLOSUS ARMATUS, Shaw. Old Wife, Bastard Dorey, Zebra Fish. Chetodon armatus, Shaw in White, Voy. N.S. Wales, 1790, pe 54,ue. 1. Specimens of this widely distributed species were preserved from off the Clarence River, New South Wales, 26-30 fathoms, Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fathoms, and off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o fathoms. 1 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ix., 1884, p. 4. FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. ate Famity APOGONICHTHYIDZ. Genus Apoconops, Ogilby. ‘lpogonops, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, xxi., 1896, p- 23 (anomalus). Ogilby’s definition of this genus requires amendment and correction. Studying his type specimen I find that whereas he saw no supplemental bone to the maxillary there is really a very distinct bone lying along the upper and inner margin of the maxillary. He writes, also, ‘‘vomer, palatines and tongue edentulous ;’’ both the first-named bear very minute teeth, and there are also some larger ones intermingled with the others on the vomer. ‘The teeth on the jaws are as described in the type, but in large examples they are as described below. Instead of ‘‘a single dorsal fin, deeply notched,’’ there are two dorsals separated by a short inter- space. No scales remain on any part of the body but the lateral line in the type, but in one of the specimens taken by the ““Thetis’’ Expedition there are some on the upper portion of the head, body and base of the tail. Ogilby has stated that they are cycloid and concentrically striated. This applies to the head scales only, they being distinctly ctenoid everywhere else. All these characters are much more easily detected in my largest specimens, 122 mm. long, than in the type which is only 54 mm. long, and, considering the care which Mr. Ogilby usually lavished on his descriptions, the differences detected are doubtless due to the want of sufficient microscopical appliances on his part. Apogonops is apparently closely allied to Synagrops, Gun- ther, but is distinguished by having three instead of only two anal spines. APOGONOPS ANOMALUS, Ogilby. (Figs) Apogonops anomalus, Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, RK LOO, "ps 24.510., Waite, Mem- Austr Mus... iv-, T8995 p- 74, pl. xin, die. 1. Disixe tao loan 7). 13 ee oor Gre dat. 46-50 to hypural. Head 22-34, depth 4;4, in the length to the hypural. Eye 3-34 in the head, longer than the snout which is 3%. Interorbital space 44. Caudal peduncle 24-24, as long as broad, its depth equal to the length of the eye. Body elongate-oblong, tapering posteriorly, compressed. Head large, some of the bones covered with membrane enclosing canals beneath it. Mouth oblique, maxillary reach- 56 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFi:C RESULTS. ing to or not so far as the middle of the eye, its posterior border slightly emarginate ; supplemental bone distinct, lying along the upper margin of the maxillary and turned in towards its inner side. Preorbital entire. Preoperculum with two borders, the inner entire; the outer serrated at and near the angle which is a little produced; short ridges extend from each tooth across the bone. Operculum with two spines, the lower a little longer than the upper. Suprascapular rounded, with a dentate margin, and a ridge on its lower portion extending forwards. Nostrils situated on the hinder half of the snout, almost equal in size, the anterior with a skinny margin. Teeth in villiform bands on the jaws, vomer and palatines, with scarcely any larger ones in the young. In the adult the premaxillaries bear crowded villiform teeth along their whole length, and have a pair of large curved fangs near their symphyses which may be double. Between these bones there is a median excavation which is toothless. Mandible with a narrow band of villiform teeth which is widest anteriorly. A strong pair of canines, corresponding to but smaller than those of the upper jaw, in front; on either side large curved teeth occur among the others which increase in size as they extend backwards, and terminate about half way along the length of the jaw. ‘These larger teeth are variable in size and number in different specimens. Vomer with two diverging bands of minute teeth, among which are some larger ones. Palatines each with a long, narrow band of minute villiform teeth. Gill- rakers of first arch long and slender, the hinder ones more than half as long as the eye and each with the inner margin minutely denticulated ; 21-22 on the lower limb. FIG, 13. Scales very deciduous, those of the upper part of the head, preorbital and mandible rounded, concentrically striated and cycloid. They also appear to have been present on the cheeks FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 577 and operculum. On the body they are similarly rounded and striated, but ctenoid; those of the lateral line have a deep notch in their posterior margins. The scales extend onto the fleshy bases of the dorsal and anal fins and onto the caudal. Lateral line almost straight and extending onto the scaly base of the caudal. First dorsal fin originating over or a little behind the base of the pectorals; the third and fourth spines are subequal, 2 or almost half as long as the head. The ninth spine is the shortest and 1s separated from the second dorsal by an inter- space a little longer than its own length. Spine of the second dorsal slightly less than half as long as the rays, which are about equal to the length of the longest spines. Anal com- mencing below the third or fourth dorsal ray; the first spine is short and stout, the second shorter than but usually much stronger than the third which is but little shorter than the rays. Ventrals placed below the anterior part of the base of the pectoral and not nearly reaching to the vent; the spine is about two thirds the length of the second ray which is the longest. Pectorals very long, 2-2 as long as the head, the upper ray rather longer than the others. Colour.—Brownish or greyish above, lighter below; oper- culum, thorax and abdomen silvery. A series of about five: dark blotches along the sides which are less distinct or absent in large specimens. Two darker patches on the scaly portion of the tail. Upper portion of the dorsal fin with a blackish patch between the second and fifth spines. Described from two specimens, 54 and 122 mm. long, the smaller one being the type of the species. Fin formula and lateral line counted in nineteen specimens. Forty-three specimens were preserved from the following localities :— Between Port Setphens and Newcastle, New South Wales, 22-60 fathoms. Twenty-five miles south-west of Cape Everard) Victoria, 83-98 fathoms. Thirty-six miles off Cape Everard, Victoria, 75 fathoms. Famity AMBASSID. Genus Priopis, Kuhl and Van Hasselt. PRIOPIS RAMSAYI, Macleay, (Plate xvi., fig. 3.) Pseudoambassis ramsayi, Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 340. Ambassis ramsayi, Ogilby, Cat. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1886, jo hme 58 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Chanda ramsayi, Waite, Mem. N S. Wales Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, Pp. 29. Ambassis gymnocephalus, Ramsay and Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i. (2), 1887, p. 1102. (Perhaps not A. gymnocephalus (Lacépéde) Bleeker. ) Abasassis, sp., Ogilby, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii. (2) 1889, p. 1559. Chanda gymnocephalus, Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, No? 2, 1904, p. 20. Di wis-vile ro) Ay tigee@ar Te: ea Meier C58 Niro sc. lat. 25-26; sc. tr. 3 + 7. Depth nearly 24, head 3i in the length to the hypural. Eye 23-3, orbit 24 in the head, and twice as long as the snout. Interorbital width 14 in the orbit. Caudal peduncle 2 in the head. Body rather deep, compressed. Upper anterior profile interrupted over the eye, the back between the nape and the dorsal more or less keeled. ‘Supraorbital ridge smooth anteriorly, armed with three to five spines on its posterior portion which is bent downwards. Antero-inferior orbital ring crenulate or spinulate. Preorbital strongly denticulate. Lower limbs of preoperculum denticulated, all the other bones smooth. Maxillary reaching to below the anterior margin of the eye. Two rows of scales on the cheeks, one behind the eye; operculum with large irregular scales, a single row on the interoperculum. Minute teeth on the jaws, vomer, palatines and tongue. Gill-rakers flattened, spinulate on their inner edges, the longest about half as long as the eye. Scales of the body extending forwards to above the middle of the eye and onto the bases of the dorsal, anal and caudal fins. Lateral line interrupted below the spine of the second dorsal or farther forward, each scale with its free margin notched. There are ten to thirteen scales on the first portion which is arched, and twelve to fourteen on the straight portion. Origin of the first dorsal a little nearer the end of the second than the tip of the snout. The first spine short, the second strong and subequal to the third and 1+ to rd in the head; the last is joined to the second dorsal by membrane. Spine of the second dorsal two-thirds as long as those of the first, shorter than the anterior rays. Anal commencing and terminating behind the second dorsal, its base either slightly longer or shorter than that fin; the first spine short, the second and third long and stout, the last as long as the rays but shorter than the second dorsal spines. Pectorals almost reaching the vertical of the first anal spines. Ventrals reach- ing to or slightly beyond the vent which is placed well in advance of the anal fin. Caudal deeply forked. ’ FISHES.—McCCULLOCH. ~ Se) Colour.—Whitish, the scales of the upper portion of the body margined with olive-green dots. A thin dark line on the median line of the tail, and a silvery lateral band in specimens in spirits. Upper portion of the head, lips and lower jaw densely spotted with olive-green. Membrane between the second and third dorsal spines blackish, and the tips of the soft dorsal and anal are darker. Caudal more or less spotted, its margin darker. Described from two specimens, 80 and 88 mm. long, recently collected in a prawn net at San Souci, Botany Bay, by Mr. J. H. Wright, and presented by him to the Australian Museum. ‘Two very imperfect specimens are in the ‘‘Endea- vour’’ collection which were taken near Sydney. I have examined the type of Pseudoambassis ramsayi in the Macleay Museum. It is very shrivelled and has lost many of its scales, but leaves no doubt that the specimens described above are correctly identified. I have also examined the specimens from the Parramatta River, identified by Ramsay and Ogilby as 4. gymnoc ephalus, and find them to be identical with Macleay’ s species, though whether they are really gymnocephalus also 1 am unable to say. They appear, how- ever, to have a much deeper body and less slender caudal peduncle than that species. Famiry SILLAGINIDAE. References to the Australian species of this family are in an extremely confused state. I have endeavoured to sort some of them into the order I believe they should be, and furnish a key which is drawn up principally from an examination of a number of specimens of each species :— a. Dorsal fins united, the first with 12-14 spines. Scales in about 130 rows :— ISOSILLAGO. b. D. xii.-xiv., 25-27; A. 24-25. Body with small dark Spots. punctata. aa. Dorsal fins separate, the first with ro-12 spines. Scales in 65-75 rows :— SILLAGO. Gap Etice ae dark mark at the base of the pectoral. d. Caudal peduncle as broad as the postorbital portion of the head. é. Do xa.. 18; A. 17-18 elat. 63-65 :— ciliata. dd. Caudal peduncle narrower than the postorbital por- tion of the head. Ae Xteoxll 9 2O-20ieteeed le, lab 70-70 3 maculata. 60 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS cc. No black mark on the base of the pectoral. g. Ventrals placed below the origin of the first dorsal. h. D. X1GaUereA® 2071: lat-.65):—-robusta: Ventrals placed in advance of the origin of the dorsal. 1. 1D. xed. 18-20,. As h20-22F leat JT? 660-68:-— bassensis. i: Dee 21-22. Ae i Qeone le ulate 69-74 :— bostockut. ni. D. sxihe22-23.5 A. 24-25 1. lat. yo sthama. Neosillago marmorata, Castelnau,! having only five spines in the first dorsal, is evidently not a member of this family, but possibly belongs to the Nototheniide. Having had the opportunity of examining the types of Tsosillago maculata, Macleay,2 I find that the number of spines and rays in the dorsal and anal fins are incorrectly stated in the original description. There are thirteen spines in the first dorsal and one spine and twenty-four or five rays in the second; the anal has twenty-four spines and rays in all. In these and all other characters they agree with Sillago punctata, Cuv. & Val., but may very well form the type of a distinct genus Jsosillago, characterised by the union of the two dorsals, larger number of spines in the first, and by having very small scales. I am unable to find any specimens marked as the types of Sillago gracilis, Alleyne and Macleay,> in the Macleay Museum, but there are two small specimens labelled ‘‘Sillago sp? Torres Straits,’’ which I have no doubt are the types. Through the kindness of Professor Haswell and Professor David, I have been allowed to borrow them for examination. One is a little larger than the other, and from the snout to the end of its broken tail is almost 82 mm. long, which is exactly the length of the figure of S. gracilis. In other details also, such as the form of the damaged tail and the pronounced shrinkage marks on the head, it agrees perfectly with the figure, though it has lost all trace of the colour markings with the exception of the silvery lateral band. Both differ from the description in the number of fin-rays in the dorsal and anal, there being only one spine and twenty rays in each instead of one, twenty- 1 Castelnau—Res. Fish. Austr. (Vict. Rec. Philad. Exhib.), 1876, p. 16. 2 Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1878, p. 34, pl. iv., fig. 3. 3 alley ne and Macleay—Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i., 1877, p. 279, pl. vi., fig. FISHES.—MCCULLOCH. 61 two as stated. I regard this of little importance, however, since Macleay also counted the same fins wrongly in his much larger specimens of Isosillago maculata, as noted above. If these two specimens be regarded as the types of S. gracilis, that species must be sunk as a synonym of S. macu- lata, Q. & G., as both the specimens and the figure agree well with that species. GENUS SILLAGO, Cuvier. SILLAGO BASSENSIS, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Bass Whiting, School Whiting. Sillago bassensis, Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., ili-y Lo29, -p..412+ 1d. Ogilby .ed™ Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, pp- 99, 101, 102; id., Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., [902 p. 190.20-— Stead, Proc) Bimn- Soe: ?NsS- Vales, xx LOGO, 4p. 574, ands Ed). Bish) (N-S. Wales, 1908; Pan0S5 u pl ex. Sillago maculata, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1.,-1872, p- 94; td., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), 116: 71d... eucas. Proc, ‘Roy-ssoc-, Vict. (m. ser), i. 1890, p. 26 (after Castelnau); id., Waite, Mem. Austr. Mus. 1V.2 1SO9..p. 109); (wee. Sa wnaculata, ©. & G.): Sillago ciliata, Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1882 (1883), Pplco, tio (nec ’S.. ciliata, ‘Cuvues Vial>): Many specimens of this common southern species were preserved. I have counted the fin-rays and scales of forty specimens from New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and West Australia and find them to be as follows: —D. x.-xi./18-20; A. 20-22; |. lat. 66-68. The °‘Endeavour”’ stations :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia, 20 fathoms. specimens were taken at the following South-east of Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. SILLAGO MACULATA, Quoy and Gaimard. Trumpeter Whiting. Sillago maculata, Quoy & Gaimard, Voy. “‘Uranie,’’ 1824, p- 261, pl. li., fig. 2; id., Giinther, Brit. Mus. Cat. Fish., li., 1860, p. 245 (part.); id., Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien., liii., p. 444; td., Alleyne & Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i., 1877, p. 279; 1d., Castelnau, , 62 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, iii., 1879, pp. 380-381 ; id.., Klunzinger, Sitzb., Ak. Wiss. Wien., Ixxx. i., p. 370; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p- 566; 1d., Woods, Fish. N.S. Wales, 1882, p. 65, pl. xxiil. ; id., Ogilby, Cat. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1886, p. 31; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, pp. 292, B37 Oe Mto Ogilby» Ed. Fish) Nes) Wales, 1893) p-) 101, (pant): id., Waite, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 1902, pp. 190, 191; id., Waite, Mem. N.S. Wales Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, Dp» Quinta. stead, Ed aiish. INS. Wales: 1908, p. 64, plo xxiv. Sillago burrus, Richardson, Icones Piscium, 19435, P= (55) plain fig. 1; 1d., Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ii. LO7 Ow Oa 232r Sillago gracilis, Alleyne & Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales imc, ai877, D.27G,mplbavias) tie 2: ’ These are all the Australian references I know of which can be definitely associated with this species. I have examined specimens from the neighbourhood of Sydney, the Gulf. of Carpentaria and Fremantle, West Australia. SILLAGO CILIATA, Cuvier and Valenciennes. Sand Whiting. Sillago ciliata, Cuvier & Valenciennes, Hist. Nat. Poiss., iii.,. 1620, p» 415, -0¢., Gunthepaporit. Muss Cat.” Kish: sais 1860, p. 245; id., Steindachner, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien., liii., 1866, p. 443; 7d., Kner, Reise Novara, Fische, 1869, p.127 00. all & Macleseroc. Linn. Soc. Nis Wales: i., 1877, p. 279; 1d., Klunzinger, Sitzb. Ak. Wiss. Wien, IxkxeeieerS79, p. 3693 "d=aViacleay, Proc Linn: (Soc NESs Wales, ov.0 ‘1881 vose5e7.7d., Woods; Mish IN-S: Wales 1882)op. 65,» plies. 542d., Ogilby, 6@at. Bish. N.S. Wales, 1886, p. 31; 1d., McCoy, Prodr. Zool. Vict.,, 1889, pl. clxxxii.; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, pp. 2902 andi370, pl. xlv.,figaeema...Osilby.. Ed. Fish. NCS: Wales, 1893, p. 102, pl. xxvii. ; 1d., Waite, Rec. Austr. Mitisessivs, L901, *p..47 saidemevVaite,, Mem: N.S3 Wales: Nat. Club, No. 2, 1904, p. 31; 1d., Jordan & Seale, Bull. US. Burs ish, xxviqm@osn(1900), (p. 277 5 10., stead: Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 63, pl. xxxiil. Sillago terre-regine, Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, i elOZO, pr 52.32: Sillago bassensis, Castelnau, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, ili., 1879, p. 381; id., Macleay, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. Wales, v., 1881, p. 567; id., Kent, Gt. Barrier Reef, 1893, p- 291; id., Tosh, Proc. Roy. Soc. Olds, xwit, 1903. p. 175, pls. viii-xiv. (nec. S. bassensis, C. & V.). FISHES.—McCULLOOR. 63: This species occurs all along the eastern coast of Australia, and has been recerded from Cape York to Port Phillip. A specimen in the British Museum is said to be from Tasmania. The specimens recorded by Castelnau from Fremantle dis- trict, West Australia, as S. ciliata* are not that species. The Australian Museum has recently received some fine examples from the same locality, from Mr. A. Abjornssen, which differ from S. ciliata in having smaller scales, a much narrower caudal peduncle, more rays in the dorsal and anal fins, and in lacking the characteristic dark mark at the base of the pectorals. They are evidently identical with Castelnau’s specimens and must, therefore, receive the alternative name, bostockii, which he proposed in case they should prove distinct from the- eastern species. Famity SCIAANIDZ. GENUS CyNOSCION, Gill. CyYNOSCION ATELODUS, Giinther. Teraglin. Otolithus atelodus, Ogilby, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1893, aye Wasp tidl eo.daile Cynoscion atelodus, Stead, Ed. Fish. N.S. Wales, 1908, p. 67, pl. xxxviil. Three examples of this species, each about a foot long, were taken fifteen miles off Saddle Hill, New South Wales, in 35 fathoms. Famity GERRID/. GENUS CHTHAMALOPTERYX, Ogziby. CHTHAMALOPTERYX MELBOURNENSIS, Castelnau. Gerres melbournensis, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., 1.,. 1872, p: 159, andiil., 1873, Pp. 37. Chthamalopteryx melbournensis, Ogilby, Proc. Zool. Soc. 1887, p. 616, fig. The ‘‘Endeavour’’ collection includes many specimens of this species which were taken at the following stations :— Off the east coast of Flinders Island, Bass Strait, 4o fathoms. Off the mouth of the Murray River, South Australia,, 20 fathoms. f Forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fathoms. Spencer Gulf, South Australia, 20 fathoms. South-east of Flinders Island, Investigator Group, South Australia, 37 fathoms. 1 Castelnau—Proe. Zool. Soc. Vict., ii., 1873, p. 133. “64 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Famity CHEILODACTYLIDA. GENUS GonustTius, Gill. GONIISTIUS VIZONARIUS, Kent. Magpie Perch. (Plate xi.) Cheilodactylus gibbosus, Castelnau, Proc. Zool. Soc. Vict., i., 1872, p. 75; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy Socy lasm. 1882 (1883), p. 112; id., Lucas, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., (n. ser.), il., 1890, p. 21 (after Castelnau) (necriG. gibbosus, Richardson). Chilodactylus visonarius, Kent, Proc. Roy. Soc. Tasm., 1887, pp. XxXx., xxxi. and 48; id., Johnston, Proc. Roy. Soe. Tasm., 1890 (1891), p. 31 ~Chilodactylus bizonarius, Kent, Naturalist in Austr., 1897, pp. 165, 166, pl. xxvili., fig. 13. DVillow25-205° A. ii Tos) bee See 6m Ve eer Oe I. lat. 65-68. Height of the body 2°6 to 2°8, length of the head 3°50 to 3°66 in the length to the hy pural Snout much longer than the hnee: of the eye which is 4°2 to 4°8 in the head. Nostrils large, close together, the anterior with two skinny lobes. Mouth rather small, the maxillary reaching to below the postertor nostril. A band of villiform teeth in each jaw; vomer, palatines and tongue toothless. There is a large conical projection in front of each eye, extending slightly outwards and upwards. 15; First dorsal originating a little behind the vertical of the preoperculum, the fifth spine generally the longest, and either equal to the distance from the snout to the preoperculum or considerably shorter. Anterior rays subequal in length, eradually decreasing backwards, the longest somewhat longer than the snout. Thee anal spine longer than the second; the second ray the longest and equal to the length from the snout to the preoperculum. The simple rays of the pectoral are very variable in their relative lengths; the second is always the longest and reaches either to the origin or middle of the anal fin. Ventral spine slender, generally equal to the fourth dorsal spine in length; the first ray reaches to, or almost to the vent. Caudal deeply forked. Scales large anteriorly, becoming smaller behind. They form a sheath to the bases of the dorsal and anal fins. On the head they are very small and extend forwards to the -anterior margin of the eyes above and to the maxillary below, leaving the snout bare. They are very small on the breast FISHES.—McCULLOCH. 6 = also, and on a narrow band which extends backwards to the ventrals. Lateral line feebly arched, its course directed to the upper part of the caudal peduncle, whence it extends onto the base.of the tail. Colour.—Silvery, the scales with or without darker margins. A broad black band occupies the space between the fifth and thirteenth dorsal spines and extends to the ventrals, narrowing considerably as it approaches them. > ia re * Ps ie 9 7" = a ( = 7 = - se Sy . Rely ee ty _—) vou 7 EXPLANATION OF PLATE V. Centriscops humerosus, Richardson. Three-fourths natural size. ZOOL. “ee RESULTS . R. MCCULLOCH, del. “ENDEAVOUR.” a & ] g 5 . - u PrATE Ve EXPLANATION OF PLATE VI. Fig. 1. Hippocampus abdominalis, Lesson. Natural size. ey bros ae graciliformis, sp. nov. Twice natural size. PLATE V] “ENDEAVOUR.”’ LOOK IESUIEES » AG by’ . Bt ; 2 ‘ | 7 "he ae Str Tit a A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPLANATION OF PEATE Vit: Fig. 1. Pempheris affinis, sp. nov. Slightly reduced. » 2. Cyttus nove-gzelandiea, Clarke. Slightly reduced. PLATE VII. “ENDEAVOUR.” SULTS ZOOL. RE A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPLANATION OF PLATE VIII. Austroberyx gerrardii, Ginther. Natural size. ZOOL: RESULELS: “ENDEAVOUR.” RrAne SVAN ~ oN wes, EROS ~ Re wit . SS a ~ . RSS _ ee A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPLANATION OF PLATE IX. Fig. 1. Seriolella brama, Giinther. Almost three-fourths natural size. 2. Solegnaihus robustus, sp. nov. Almost three- fourths natural size. a IX. PLATE AVOUR.”’ NDE WLAN Sy Yea ak RI ZOOL: Re f sh AS a at ay ance Te tied a ie MCCULLOCH, del. A. EXPLANATION OF PLATE X. Fig. 1. Seriolella punctata, Forster. Almost three-fourths natural size. 2. Taeniomembras microstoma, Gunther. Twice and one-fourth natural size. PEATE Xe NDEAVOUR. ™ oe LOOK VRESUET'S A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPLANATION OF PEATE XI- Goniistius vizonarius, Kent. About one-half natural size. Pie Ai wee NDEAVOUR.”’ OE SUIGUS 4 RE LOOK. A. R. MCCULLOCH, del EXPLANATION OF PLATE XII. Dactylosparus macropterus, Forster. Slightly reduced. PLATE XII “RNDEAVOUR. a Nii ; é ‘ iy yy YI ‘) ‘ PV SLA A Gas ) ‘ ; f 22h a yyeered 1) & L KA? “yi A R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPEANATION VOR WgAT ESE Pseudolabrus cyanogenys, Ramsay and Ogilby. One-half natural size. PLATE XSLE: —ENDEAVOUR-”: ZOOL, ‘(RESULTS rt t | eee e A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIV. Chromis hypsilepsis, Giinther. Natural size. XIV PLATE SAVOUR.’ “ENDE SUETS LO OW WE MCCULLOCH, del. A. R. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XV. Schuettea scalaripinnis, Steindachner. Slightly reduced. PLATE, Ve “ENDEAVOUR.” SUES HO OT RE UY : / ——— = ) iy om yy yi y) AA ynheiy A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. ol . bo EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVI. Zenopsis nebulosus, Schlegel. Three-fifths naturai size. Atherina dannevigi, sp. nov. Once and one-fifth natural size. Priopis ramsayi, Macleay. Once and one-fifth natural size. PPA exavile ” “ENDEAVOUR. RESUEMS ZOOL: “yee SY XVIVITT TTY ( ” AAO CE OO ' Weddle WA Wve YY A. R. MCCULLOCH, del. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIT. Figs. 1, 2, 3. Verticordia ericia, Hedley. Exterior, hinge and magnified sculpture. Fig. 4. Venericardia rosulenta, Tate. 5, 6, 7, 8. Myrte@a bractea, Hedley. Lateral and superior aspects and hinges. g, 10, 11, 12. Corbis percostata, Hedley. Exterior and interior aspects and hinges. ZOOL, RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR?” PLATE XVII. PHYLLIS CLARKE, del. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIII. 13, 14. Puncturella fumarium, Hedley. Lateral and superior aspects. 15. Gibbula ocellina, Hedley. 16, 17. Danilia telebathia, Hedley. Shell and varix. 18, 19, 20. Leptothyra fugitiva, Hedley. Lateral, superior and inferior aspects. Rissoa hulliana, Vate, var. eucraspeda, Hedley. », lockyert, Hedley. ZOOL, RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XVIII. PHYLLIS CLARKE, del. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIX. Fig. 23. Rissoa verconiana, Hedley. ,, 24. Amphithalamus costatus, Hedley. » 25- Onoba bassiana, Hedley. Figs. 26, 27. Cerithiopsis dannevigi, Hedley. enlarged apex. ,, 28, 29. Cerithiopsis geniculosus, Hedley. enlarged apex. Shell and ‘Shell and »> 30, 31, 32, 33. Marginella fulgurata, Hedley. Colour variety and typical form, immature shell in which the spire whorls appear through a film of callus, and senile stage in which the spire is buried under a pile of callus. ZOOL RESULETS= “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XIX. eEEAY i) PHYLLIS OLARKE, del. Fig. Figs. Fig. ” Figs. EXPLANATLON TOR (EIA Xone 34. Amphithalamus inclusus, Carpenter. 35, 36. Conus superstes, Hedley, and separate proto- conch. 37. Mitra stadialis, Hedley. 38. Ringicula meridionalis, Hedley. 39, 40. Ringicula semisculpta, Hedley. Lateral and frontal aspects. 41, 42. Campbages jaffensis, Blochmann. Different aspects of the brachial apparatus. te, ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XX eo, PHYLLIS CLARKE, del. III. Report on the Sponges obtained by the F.I.S. ’ ‘“ Endeavour’ Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, manila. PAR BY BE. KF. HALLMANN, B.Sc., ZooLocist Australian Museum, Sydney. Plates) XXI.-xxXV1I.3 Mextfigs: 21-69: on the Coasts of New South Wales, and ‘Tas- 42414 SPONGES.—HALLMANN. Il].— REPORT ON THE SPONGES. Part I. I.— INTRODUCTION. The Sponges which have so far been obtained by the ‘Endeavour’’ consist almost exclusively of Monaxonellida and IKeratosa in approximately equal numbers. In this Report I propose to deal only with the former of these; the latter will scarcely prove suitable for purposes of investigation unless taken in conjunction with additional material, since in the main they are preserved in a dry condition, and there are among them altogether too few specimens of any one species. Inasmuch as an extensive collection of well-preserved Keratose sponges, particularly from the Australian area, would un- questionably be of extreme scientific value, it is greatly to be hoped that the fullest advantage will be taken of the unique opportunities provided by the trawling operations of the ‘*Endeavour’’ to bring together as large a number as possible of these forms. In order to deal effectively with the material placed at my disposal, it was found necessary, as a preliminary task, to undertake the re-investigation of certain previously described species, including more particularly a number of those which were first described by Dr. R. von Lendenfeld in his ‘‘ Descrip- tive Catalogue of Sponges in the Australian Museum,’’! and afterwards by Mr. 1. Whitelegge in his ‘‘Report on Sponges from the Coastal Beaches of New South Wales.’ As a result I find that, whereas the latter author is correct in pronouncing the original descriptions of these species to be in many instances inaccurate, yet he himself has committed a number of serious errors, owing to a too hasty conclusion that the specimens investigated were the actual types. This explains the anomalous circumstance that the descriptions which the two authors have given of certain species are devoid of agreement in any essential particular. Unfortun- ately, however, not all the discrepancies can be thus explained, and considerable caution will be necessary in deciding par- ticular cases. Mr. Whitelegge evidently proceeded on the assumption that the specimen carrying the author’s label must be accepted unquestioningly, in preference to the description, as the ultimate criterion of the species; but, although such a 1 8vo, Sydney, 1888. 2 Whiteleege—Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 55, pls. x.-xv 118 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. course may be perfectly reasonable and right so long as the authenticity of the specimen remains undoubted, it surely can no longer be pursued when sufficient evidence exists to prove the contrary. It was not my intention, at the outset, to include in this Keport any details of the results of this subsidiary investiga- tion (except in so far as they bore directly upon the species of the “‘Endeavour’’ collection), but to reserve them as the subject of an independent paper. Owing, however, to the very unsatisfactory state of the descriptions of many of the species examined, and in view of the possibility that a con- siderable time may elapse before a complete account of them can be furnished, I came to the conclusion that it would be wrong to allow this opportunity to pass without at any rate making such corrections as might render possible their identi- fication. Accordingly I have added to the Report, often in the form merely of foot-notes, a series of observations which practically amount to a brief revision of the Ectyonine originally described in various publications of the Aus- tralian Museum. As the work of preparation was con- ducted in the Australian Museum itself, I have had the advan- tage of having before me in most cases the actual specimens, and in many cases the actual slides upon which the original descriptions were based. In addition, very material assist- ance was afforded me in the identification of species by a valuable series of mounted sections of Port Phillip sponges and a large number of fragments of Australian sponges pre- served in the British Museum, which Prof. A. Dendy some years ago generously placed at the disposal of this Museum. In regard to certain Ectyonine species I have expressed the opinion that new genera should be established for them, but I have purposely refrained from introducing such new genera because I recognise that, in order to do this in a thoroughly satisfactory manner, it would be necessary to undertake a much wider comparative study of the species of this group than—owing to lack of literature, if for no other reason—I have found to be possible. After the manuscript of the Report had been completed and at too late a date to admit of any alterations in the text, I received a copy of the second part of Dr. Hentschel’s paper on the sponges of South-west Australia; consequently any de- ductions which it has enabled me to make are necessarily relegated to the footnotes, or to concluding paragraphs. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 119 IIl.—DESCRIPTION OF THE GENERA AND SPECIES. FamMity SPIRASTRELLIDA. GENUS SPIRASTRELLA, Schmidt. SPIRASTRELLA MONTIFORMIS, Sp. nov. (Plate xxi. ties, 2h andelio. ) 2.1.) Sponge mound-shaped, rising to a central peak, on the summit of which one or several oscula are situated; upper aspect of sponge with short digitiform or ridge- like processes on which apical oscula are rarely to be found. No rind. Spicules not aggregated into definite fibres. Megascleres :—Tylostyli (sometimes reduced to slyli), of varying length and stoutness, reaching a maxi- mum size of 710 x 12 4. Maicroscleres :—Spirasters of two kinds, viz., shorter tuberculated forms principally confined to the superficial layer, 25 long g; and slender zigzag sharp-spined forms chiefly to be found in the canal walls of the interior and reaching to $0 yt or more in length. This species is represented in the collection by eight speci- mens, all of which are preserved in the dry state. Although showing a moderate amount of variability in external form, they may be satisfactorily described in general terms as mas- sive, sessile, somewhat mound- -shaped sponges, roughly circular in horizontal section, and usually prolonged upwards into a more or less well-defined pinnacle. They are attached by a broad base of only slightly lesser extent than the maxi- mum transversal of the sponge, which is attained some short distance above it. The fact that the maximum girth does not coincide with the actual base, renders the term ‘‘mound- shaped”’ not perfectly applicable, and admits of a distinction into an extensive upper surface, and a _ restricted lower one. [rom the former there arise few or many elevations in the form either of short digitiform processes, or of compressed ridges. The interior of the sponge, to within a few milli- metres of the surface, is traversed by numerous rather wide canals, some of which attain a diameter of 10 mm.; they are lined by a distinct aspiculous membrane, which also forms dissepiments across their lumina. ‘The central peak is pene- trated to its apex by one or several of these canals, which terminate in a corresponding number of oscula. Occasionally a few of the secondary elevations are similarly provided, but usually they contain only minor branches of the canal system. 120 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. In the present condition of the sponges, the oscula are closed, and not readily perceived; but their presence is, in every case, indicated by longitudinal furrows and puckers of the extremity of the processes bearing them, and is, of course, readily demonstrated by sectioning. Of the specimens of the present series, the largest and the smallest are those which depart most from the mean form. The former is sub-elliptical in horizontal outline, and in 120 mm. in height; the principal diameters of its base are 140 mm. and go mm. respectively, whilst the cor- responding measurements of its greatest transverse section are 200 mm. and 120 mm. It ts fur- nished with more than 100 pro- cesses, the greater number of which are ridge-shaped. The smallest specimen is subfusiform in shape, and is provided with only four digitiform processes. The consistency in the dry state is, one might say, intermediate between that of cork and pith; the superficial layer is slightly harder and more friable, but there is no indication of a rind. The colour is pale grey within, and yellowish- grey on the surface. The skeleton is diffuse, without any indication of definite fibres, and consists of a fairly dense and irregular aggre- gation of straight spicules show- ing all gradations between styli and tylostyli. Even in proximity to the surface there is no well- Fig. 21—S. montiformis. a defined arrangement of the mega- Larger tylostyli (basal ex- scleres, although a considerable tremity). b Slender tylo- proportion of them stand more or styli (ditto). c Spined spi- face. Specmendicularciy ath thee rasters. d Tuberculated See cn oles car ae spiraster. points (or not infrequently, in the case of the larger spicules, with their basal extremities) impinging on, or barely projecting beyond, the surface. The spirasters are comparatively few in number and are confined almost exclusively to the external surface and to the walls of the canals immediately beneath their lining membrane. SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. Tan Megascleres.—lIt is difficult to say whether these belong to one, two, or three categories. At first sight it might appear that two kinds are to be distinguished, viz., (i.) stouter tylo- styli, with a tylosis of only moderate size, ‘which is perhaps most frequently subterminal in position and more or less re- duced (or sometimes absent) and which has a quite smooth surface and not very variable contour; and (11.) very slender tylostyli (of scarcely lesser length), in which the frequently relatively large tylosis is extremely variable in shape and size, often exhibits tubercular irregularities of the surface, and is occasionally several times repeated. The former spicules vary in length from less than 200 pt to slightly more than 700 jt, and in diameter up to 12 jt; it is seldom, however, that their length exceeds 650 jt or their diameter 10 yt; usually they taper to a quite sharp point, but more or less strongylote terminations occur. The latter or slender tylostyli appear to be rarely more than 3 jt in diameter and may attain a length of at least 640 p. A oe thorough scrutiny of the spicules shows, however, that forms intermediate between these kinds occur, though they are comparatively few in number; and, taking all the facts into consideration, it 1s not possible to decide with certainty whether the two degrees of stoutness are merely the expression of different developmental stages, or whether they have a more important significance and indicate either that the spicules have undergone a partial differentia- tion into two groups or actually represent two distinct orders. Again, it is to be observed that the stouter spicules vary con- siderably in length; and on analysis it appears not improbable that in another respect also a certain amount of differentiation into two groups has been affected since a relatively large pro- portion of the spicules below a length of 300 y or thereabouts (the diameter of which is 6 to 8 #) are simply stylote, and are subfusiform in shape. But these peculiarities are not confined to the shorter spicules, and are not, indeed, strikingly charac- teristic of them. These shorter spicules appear to greatly predominate amongst those which stand perpendicularly at the surface of the sponge. Microscleres.—Spirasters of two kinds occur: (i.) Small tuberculated forms, extremely variable in shape, often with the tubercules chiefly confined to one side, 12 to 32 # in length, and up to 4 # in breadth exclu- sive of the tubercules. These, together with an inconsiderable admixture of those of the second kind, form an exceedingly thin but apparently not continu- ous superficial layer, and also occur in_ limited numbers in the canal walls. 122 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (ii.) Elongated spined forms, occurring for the most part only in the immediate circumference of the canals, in the walls of which they lie tangentially, loosely scattered in a single layer. It frequently happens that several together are apposed so closely, and in such a way, that they cannot by any means be distinguished from a single large branched spicule. Speaking generally, they are characterised by their slender zig- zag form, and the very evident spiral arrangement of their spines. Their length, which is rather variable, sometimes reaches above 80 y; their diameter rarely exceeds 3 pt. Loc.—East coast of Queensland, seven miles east of Double Island Point, 33 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). S. montiformis is probably most nearly related to S. vaga- bunda, Ridley, and S. tentorioides, Dendy. ‘The striking resemblance which its elongated zigzag spirasters bear to those of Clionopsis platei, Thiele, and to certain species of Cliona, not only supports the opinion that Spirastrella, Cliona and Clionopsis are allied genera, but seems also to show that such spirasters are of primitive form. SPIRASTRELLA POCULOIDES, Sp. nov. (Plate xxi., fig. 1, and fig. 22.) Sponge sessile, massively cup-shaped. Surface smooth ; even, or provided with a few low dome-shaped eleva- tions. The oscula (?) are microscopic circular openings on an average *25 mm. apart. Skeleton semi-diffuse, non- fibrous; spirasters scattered in moderate abundance throughout all parts and forming a cortical layer. Megas- cleres :—Tylostyli of a single kind measuring 560 x 13 wl. Microscleres :—Spirasters of a single kind, 50 x to yw. The following description is based on a single specimen. The sponge is a stout-walled and exceeding thick-bottomed, compressed, sessile cup. Its shape may be conceived as hav- ing been attained by the upgrowth of a broad pillar, in which growth has proceeded most rapidly at the periphery. The surface is very smooth, and generally even; the only inequali- ties are in the form of a few broad, rounded protuberances. The interior of the sponge is free from noticeable cavities, and of very uniform structure throughout. The texture of its internal substance, when dry, is such as might result from the close compression of some finely divided fibrous material ; there is no appearance macroscopically of extended fibres. Owing to the firmness and density of the superficial layer and the SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 1 2 compactness of the skeleton generally, the sponge ts (in the dry state) fairly hard and incompressible. The dimensions of the specimen are as follows :—Height, 100 mm. ; depth of cup, 40 mm.; average thickness of cup-wall, 15 mm. ; principal internal diameters of cup, 120 mm. and 30 mm. No oscula are visible to the naked eye. The surface, however, is pierced by minute circular openings 40 to 50 p in diameter and, on an average, about 250 # apart. In a thick vertical section, cut trans- versely through the cup-wall, two regions are roughly distinguishable : (i.) A superficial layer varying from t mm. to 4 mm. wide, in which the spicules are not at all collected into strands, but are closely crowded without recognis- able order except in some parts of its outer limits, where the majority of the spicules may stand more or less perpendicularly to the surface. The spirasters, which are plentifully scat- tered throughout the whole sponge, become more and more closely aggregated as the surface is approached, and ultimately produce, by their close crowding, a dense and compact thin external crust. (ii.) An extensive central region traversed by irregularly sinuous, ascending ‘‘fibres”’ or ‘‘columns’’ composed of loosely associated spicules. Tngeeitemssiection the ‘‘columns’’ appear to be discontinuous, owing pro- i | | | | | Fig. 22—S. poculotdes a Tylostyle. a4 Ditto basalextremity). b Spi- rasters. bably to their passing out of the plane of section. They sometimes broaden out into diffuse bands, sometimes contract into more compact strands. The 124 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. spaces between the ‘‘columns’’ are occupied by a pro- fusion of single spicules, spicule bundles, short spicule dies: and sheet-like patches, as w ell as by scattered spirasters: all of which together constitute no inconsiderable proportion of the. entire skeleton, and in macroscopic examination mask from view the more definitely fibrous aggregations of the spicules. Spicules. (i.) The megascleres are tylostyli which, as a rule, are straight; they are of uniform diameter throughout the greater part of their length and gradually taper thence to a sharp point; greatest size 560 x 13 yl. (i1.) The spirasters are of a single kind and reach a length of 50 »# (though usually much shorter) and a dia- meter, exclusive of spines, of 5 to 10 #. The spines are large, approximating in length to the diameter of the spicule-shaft, and in the case of the larger spic- ules are about twenty in number. Loc.—North coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of Sandon Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). SPIRASTRELLA ALCYONIOIDES, sp. nov. (Plate xxdy ioe 2) and) fie 233) Sponge an erect, compact, sessile cluster of frondiform or of angular or only slightly compressed digitiform up- gro: wihs, of which some proceed from the very base of the sponge, whilst some arise as outgrowths or lobes from others. Oscula situated apically on the digitiform ter- minals. Surface smooth, with slight longitudinal in- equalities and a few small ascendant papilliform projec- tions. Sponge in the dry state very hard. Skeleton semi-diffuse; without fibres, but with occasional very broad columns of parallely-arranged spicules. The sub- stance of the sponge is abundantly traversed by browntsh spongin-like streaks which, however, show no particular relation to the spicule arrangement. Spirasters of a single kind are plentifully scattered throu gh all parts and form a compact superficial layer. Spicules :—Tylostyli of one kind, with blunt rounded distal extremity, measuring 440 x § pw; and large-spined stout spirasters, 40 x 7 Wt. Two specimens of this species were obtained, both of which are preserved in a dry state. The characteristic form of the sponge appears to result from the upgrowth, in the first place, of a few processes from a basal disk of limited extent, which processes, as they grow, either remain simply digitiform, SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. l25 or become broadened and flattened (frondiform) and more or less subdivided. In any case the uppermost part of the sponge consists chiefly, of separated digitiform terminals, which are usually tapered and somewhat pointed, and are provided apically each with one or a few oscula. The larger speci- men (Plate xxi., fig. 3), which measures 130 mm. in height, consists almost entirely of frondiform components; the smaller, 3 if digitiform. Inits dried , condition, the sponge 1s particularly dense, hard and tough; although the amount of shrinkage has seemingly been but slight. The surface is smooth, but slightly uneven owing to the presence of dis- continuous undulations and obscure ridges, which, however, may be due to contraction. In addition, the sponge is provided with small scat- tered verruciform up- wardly directed eleva- , tions; these are some- times fairly numerous on the upper margins of the more flattened upgrowths, but, generally speaking, their occurrence is _ irre- gular and it is not certain that they are a constant feature. ihe colour of the sponge is _yellowish- Fig. 23—Spirastrella alcyonioides. grey. a Tylostyle. 4 Ditto. (basal ex- The precise arrange- ‘émity). b Spiraster. ment of the skeleton is not apparent in the present condition of the specimens owing to the distortion which it has undergone, consequent upon drying. It is only possible to refer in general terms to its main features (e.g., as exhibited in longitudinal section of a 126 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. digitiform terminal). Such a section, in general, shows one or two main or oscular canals cut longitudinally, and a spicular skeleton which is, for the most part, of a diffuse type, without any definite aggregation of spicules into fibres. It is traversed, however, by a few broad ‘‘columns”’ of rather closely packed parallel spicules, somewhat resembling the ‘‘axial condensa- tions”’ of certain Axinellids. Some of these run longitudinally, whilst others are cut transversely. Another feature, perhaps deserving of note, is the occurrence of numerous longitudinal pale brownish-coloured streaks, the appearance of which is somewhat suggestive of spongin. These streaks are absent from the columnar spicule-tracts. Megascleres.—The megascleres are straight cylindrical tylo- styli of a single kind, with strongylote distal extremity ; size, 400-440 x 4-8 ju. Microscleres.—The spirasters are fairly straight spicules, provided with twenty to thirty large spines, which are about 7 # in length. They are plentifully scattered through the tissues, and form a dense superficial layer 100 to 200 i in thickness ; the size of the largest is about 40 x 7 pu. Loc.—East coast of Queensland, twenty-five miles south- east of Double Island Point, 33 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’) SPIRASTRELLA PAPILLOSA, Ridley and Dendy. 1887. Spirastrella papillosa, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger’’ Monaxonida, 1887, p. 232, pl. xli.,. fig. 5, ply xlve, figs. ie ta The Museum collection contains six speciments of this species. They vary considerably in shape, but are always provided with several large apically situated oscula, and in other respects agree exactly with the description of the type, except that they do not show any sign of ‘“‘deep longitudinal wrinkles’? near the apex. The warty appearance of the sur- face appears to be a constant character. Locs.—Shoalhaven Bight, New South Wales, 15-45 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’); Port Jackson, New South Wales, 30-35 fms. (‘‘Challenger’’); Port Jackson, New South Wales, and Port Phillip, Victoria (Austr. Mus. Coll.). Genus Latruncu.ia, Bocage. LATRUNCULIA CONULOSA, sp. nov. (Plate xxil., fig. 1, and fig. 24.) Sponge submassive, sessile, with aculeated surface. Consistency and texture dense, somewhat rubber-like. No oscula. Surface glabrous, dotted with minute pore- groups. Main skeleton a _ reticulation of strongly- SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 127 developed, stout fibres composed of styli. Surface conuli, each forming the centre of a radiate system of slender fibres. There is a dermal layer of discasters of the larger kind. Megascles:—Blunt-pointed styli 365 x 11 jt, together with a few (probably immature) sharp-pointed, slenderer spicules which attain an equal length. Micro- scleres :—Discasters of two kinds, of which the larger form a superficial layer and a packing round the main fibres, and are also scattered through the ground sub- stance along with the smaller. The larger are provided with simple spines, the smaller often with compound spines, the spines in both cases being arranged in four whorls, two at either end. The single specimen consists of a sessile, submassive, erect, cylindrical main portion, together with a similar but smaller upgrowth which arises partly from the substratum in con- tinuity with the base of the former and partly from its side. The main trunk is 70 mm. in height, and 30 mm. in diameter. The surface, which is smooth and glabrous, is provided with numerous spine-like conuli, 1 to 3 mm. in height. There are no oscula. The surface is closely dotted with minute pore areas, about .2 mm. in diameter, and each with two to four pores. The texture is dense and com- pact, the consistency firm and fairly tough; in both respects the sponge is somewhat suggestive of india-rubber, although, of course, not so. dense, homogeneous or elastic. The colour (in spirits) is pale brownish-grey. 4 The main skeleton con- : sists of a very loose reti- os culation of stout fibres (up to 400 mm. or more in Fig. 24—Latrunculia conulosa. a thickness) which are com-_ Styli. b Larger discaster. c Smaller posed solely of densely discasters. packed parallel _ styli. Each surface-conulus forms the apex of a convergent pencil of fibres, of which the axial or principal fibre only is derived from the main skeletal reticulation, whilst the remainder— which are very much slenderer fibres—both begin and termin- ate at the surface. Probably it would be more correct to say 128 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. of the latter, that they proceed from the apex of the conulus, and after running inwards, with gradually increasing diver- gence, for a short distance towards the sponge-interior, gradually curve round and return again to meet the surface at varying distances from their starting point—the more cen- trally situated fibres of the pencil proceeding to a further distance than the more peripheral. Styli similar to those com- posing the fibres are sparingly scattered through the tissues together with discasters of two kinds, a larger and a smaller. The former are closely aggregated in the immediate surround- ing of all the main fibres encircling them as a kind of loose sheath. The cortical skeleton is a layer of closely packed discasters almost exclusively of the larger kind; it is about 300 to 400 p in thickness. Megascleres.—These are styli, probably of a single kind— the stouter with a more or less blunt or rounded distal ex- tremity, and occasionally becoming almost perfectly stron- gylote; the slenderest usually -sharply pointed. They are sometimes elongately subtylote at the basal end, and have a maximum size of 365 x II y. Microscleres.—(i.) The larger discasters are stout spicules, having a short central region devoid of spines, and on either side of this two more or less distinct whorls of large spines: those of the terminal whorl projecting obliquely forwards; those of the sub-terminal, stand- ing more or less perpendicularly to the spicule-axis. They are about 4o yt in length (exclusive of spines), and have a diameter in their spineless central region of about 12 yw. The spines are 10 to 12 4 long. The smaller discasters are very variable in form, no two apparently being quite alike. They are much slenderer spicules than the preceding, with an elon- gated spineless central region, and at either end, two more or less distinct whorls of simple or (more usually) compound spines, the latter of which are columnar in form, with a few terminal spinules. The terminal whorl of spines is often reduced and then appears as a prolongation of the axis of the spicule. | These spicules are at most 38 yw in length (inclusive of spines), and have a diameter centrally of 1 to 4 (rarely more than 2.5 m). The stouter individuals may represent a third kind of discaster intermediate between the other two. (ii. = Loc.—North coast of Tasmania, off Devonport. (‘“En- deavour.’’) . SPONGES. -HALLMANN. 129 FamiLty POLYMASTIID:. Genus PotyMastTiA, Bowerbank. POLYMASTIA CRATICIA, sp. nov. (Plate xxii., fig. 3, and fig. 25-) Sponge depressed dome-shaped, sessile, with thick- walled digitiform tubular processes some of which are provided with a single apical osculum. Main skeleton consisting of a fairly dense matrix of scattered spicules and spicule bundles traversed vertically by fairly stout distant fibres. The fibres lying immediately beneath the cortex of the processes comprise an outer series of wavy fibres running circumferentially and forming an elegant wickerwork, and of an underlying series of equidistant longitudinal fibres. The cortex consists of styli arranged ina dense palisade. Spicules:—These are of three kinds, vig., fusiform styli of two orders of size which (par- ticularly the larger) are scarcely distinguishable from oxea, the larger occurring in the main skeleton, the smaller in the cortex; and fusiform tylostyli which occur along with the larger styli scattered through the ground tissues. The first attain a size of 1200 x 22 p; the second, 350 x 9 Hw; and the last, 200 x 5 W. The sponge is sub-circular in horizontal outline, broadest at the base, with a convex upper surface from which numerous longer or shorter stout digitiform processes arise. Of four specimens, the two which differ most in their proportions are respectively 55 x 80 x 50 mm., and 4o x go x 75 mm. in neight, length and breadth. These two also differ most in the lengths of their processes, which in the former are never more than 10 mm. long, in the latter usually between 15 and 30 mm. The processes are usually tapered to a point and vary from 60 to 80 in number. When, as sometimes is the case, they are cylindrical and distally rounded, the osculum, if it occurs, is situated on the summit of a small terminal papilla. The specimens are preserved in a dry state, and the follow- ing remarks therefore apply to the sponge in that condition. The surface is quite smooth to the touch but has a minutely velvety appearance due to the slightly projecting points of the densely crowded cortical spicules. Internally the sponge con- sists of a dense, but rather soft and friable matrix traversed vertically by fibres about 250 # in stoutness. The fibres are composed solely of closely packed spicules of the largest kind, which are fusiform styli closely resembling oxea; the matrix consists of a disorderly profusion of spicule-bundles and single 130 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Fig. 25— P. craticia. a Stylus (of the fibres). b Stylus (of the cortex, drawn to a larger scale than the preceding). c Tylostylus (of the cortex). spicules of the same kind together with smaller tylostyli. The cortical skeleton proper consists of crowded fusiform sub- styli arranged perpendicularly to the surface, but immediately beneath and closely associated with it is a_ thin matted layer of mostly horizontally dis- posed styli of the larger kind. Fibres from the inner skeleton penetrate into the cortex, spreading out slightly at their extremities in a penicillate fashion ; the terminal spicules of these fibres usually project slightly at the surface. The arrangement of the fibres imme- diately underlying the cortex is one of marked regularity. In the body of the sponge, a series of equidistant parallel fibres running upwards from the base is most conspicuous, but in the processes, a series of circumferentially directed fibres external to these also comes into prominence. The latter run undulat- ingly and intercross so as to form a wickerwork-like structure of very ele- gant pattern. The specific name has been bestowed in reference to this feature. Spicules.— (i.) The larger oxea-like styli are straight, and measure 660- 1200 X 12-22 4. Gi.) The smaller are usually slightly curved and more distinctly stylote ; they range in size from 220 X ©) tO’ 350 x © #- (iii.) The tylostyli (or subtylostyli) are fusiform and _ usually slightly curved. They occur singly and in small bundles in the ground substance. Size: 120 X 3 tO 200 X § HL. Loc.—North coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of Sandon Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’) > SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 121 Famity ASTRAXINELLIDA, Dendy. Dendy! has suggested the advisability of instituting a new fa. 1ily—Astraxinellide—for the reception of certain Axinel- lide which are distinguished by the possession of astrose microscleres. The Astraxinellide he would place in the divi- sion Astromonaxonellida, whilst the Axinellide in the restricted sense would remain in the Sigmatomonaxonellida. If we could learn all the facts concerning the phylogeny of the Axinellide it would no doubt be found that, whereas some have been evolved from Desmacidonid and Haplosclerid ancestors and some (? e.g., Tvachycladus®) directly from more primitive sigmatophorous forms, yet a considerable number have developed along lines of descent which diverge from the Astrotetraxonid stem. In a natural system of classification the last-mentioned would be excluded from the Sigmatomon- axellida, and they would probably require several families for their reception. Unfortunately, it is impossible in the present state of our knowledge to determine, in the majority of cases, to which of the two primary Tetraxonid subdivisions a given Axinellid genus belongs, and consequently no altogether satisfactory bipartition of the family is to be expected without much further enquiry. Nevertheless, there is much to be said in favor of a removal forthwith from the Axinellidz of such genera as afford sufficient evidence of their Astrotetraxonid affinities ; and these might very well be placed provisionally in a single family, irrespective of any question as to whether their relationships are close or distant. On this understanding I feel but slight hesitation in placing under the family Astrax- inellidee the new genus Paracordyla, which possesses an Axin- ellid type of skeletal structure and yet has microscleres in the form of amphiasters. 1 Dendy—Rept. Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, with Rept. Mar. Biol. Ceylon, Part 3, 1905, p. 107. 2 In this connection, I would suggest that a new family—Spirasigmidze —be established to include Trachya globosa. Carter (Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 5, Xvil., 1886, p. 121), and its variety, rugosa (Op. cit., xviii. 1886, p. 457), Gellius aculeatus, Whitelegge (Sponges of Funafuti, Austr. Mus. Mem., lii., 5, 1897, p. 326), and perhaps also the genus Trachycladus. For the first- mentioned of these species Topsent (Mém. Soc. Zool. France, vii., 1894, p. 8), has already proposed the genus. Trachygellius; for the second I now propose a new genus Spirasigma. In both of these genera the micro- scleres resemble the sigmaspires of Trachycladus more closely than they resemble ordinary sigmata, and the conformation of the skeleton is strongly suggestive of their derivation from the Tetillide. Of these species I have examined (only) sections which were prepared by Mr. Whitelegge—those of TJ. globosa and its variety having been cut from pieces of British Museum specimens, and that of the latter from its type- specimen. If the former sections are correctly labelled—and I scarcely doubt that they are—T. globosa and T’. globosa, var. rugosa are specifically distinct. Both in Trachygellius and Spirasigma the skeleton has a radial arrangement recalling that of the Donatiide. In the former the large diactinal spicules (oxea in the two known species) are accompanied by sigmata only; in the latter (in which, in the single species, the large 132 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTs. GENUS PARACORDYLA, gen. nov. The inner skeleton is a dense columnar aggregation @ large oxea which, in linear outgrowths of the sponge” - body (if these be present), takes the form of a very com- pact axial core. Spongin appears to be wholly absent. The ectosomal skeleton is a dense palisade of vertical microxea supplemented by ‘‘dermal brushes’’ of styli or oxea. Between the ectosomal layer and the inner skeleton-mass is a narrow zone penetrated by canals and crossed by strands of the large oxea. In addition to microxea, microscleres in the form of small amphiasters are present. The spiculation of this genus is remarkably similar to that of Scolopes moseleyi, Sollas ;t but since Sollas speaks of fibres in connection with his species, and remarks that the general character of its skeleton reminds one forcibly of that in Carter’s genus T'rachya, there is evidently a distinct generic difference between Paracordyla and Scolopes. Amongst the Axinellidae, the genus which makes the nearest approach to Paracordyla, appears to be Ceratopsis, Thiele.? PARACORDYLA LIGNEA, sp. nov. \ (Platerxxi, fie: 2) and figss 20.277) Sponge sessile, with a massive body from which branch-like elongations may arise. Consistency, owing to the enormous development of the spicules, very dense and solid. Surface even, pilose. Oscula wanting. The skeleton of the whole of the inner mass of the sponge to within a few millimetres of the surface is formed of closely aggregated large oxea, with a general parallel arrange- ment, which, in the branch- like parts, form an almost solid core. Between the core and the superficial layer (cortex) is @ narrow zone, 2 to 3 mm. wide, crossed by strands of similar oxea, the outer spicules of which pro- ject well beyond the surface. The surface is also pro- tected by brushes of shorter spicules varying in form from styli to oxea. The canals of the subcortical sone are surrounded by radially disposed microxea, and similar spicules, together with minute amphiasters, are scattered through the ground substance. Megascleres :—(i.) Oxea of the main skeleton reaching a size of 3200 x 50 qt; (il.) styli and asymmetrical oxea of the dermal brushes vary- ing in length from less than 200 to about 7oo jt, with spicules of the fibres are substrongyla) there are in addition scattered small oxea. If in Spirasigma aculeata the fibre-forming strongyla dis- appeared, the species would, without doubt, owing to the mode of dis- tribution of its smaller oxea, be classed as a Gellius. 1 Sollas—‘‘Challenger” Tetraxonida, 1885, p. 432, pl. xliii., figs. 1-9. 2 Thiele—Studien uber pazifische spongien, Zoologica, Heft 24, 1898, p. 56. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 33 maximum diameter of 1S py. Microscleres :—(i.) Mi- croxea, 100 to 140 pw in length by about 4 jt in diameter; (ii.) amphiasters, 4 to 5 yw long. The single specimen is a moderately large, massive, sessile sponge, of great density and solidity, with a rounded cuboidal or sub-globose body which measures about 120 mm. in each of its three principal directions. From the marginal region of the somewhat flat- tened upper surface of the main body there are given off, at sub-equal dis- tances, three stout branch-like pro- cesses, 100 to 150 mm. in length. One of these is cylindrical, the others are club-shaped and are polytomously divided at their extremities into in- cipient branches. The specimen, which has been longitudinally bisected, is, with the exception of one of its processes, preserved in a dry state. The contrac- tion resulting from drying has caused the surface to split in places, giving rise to a number of shallow gaping fissures, such as are occasioned under similar circumstances in many Axinellids. The surface of the dried portion somewhat resembles short-piled velvet, both in appearance and to the touch; that of the spirit piece has a harsher feeling. The colour of the former is yellowish- white, both externally and internally ; the latter is similarly tinted, except superficially, where to a depth of about one-third of a millimetre, it exhibits an intense purple colouration which, how- ever, is almost certainly a stain derived from crinoids originally preserved in the same liquid. The texture, as revealed by the cut surface resulting from the bisection of the specimen, bears a close resemblance to that of some coarse and exceedingly short-grained hardwood. The densely packed spicules are visible to the naked eye, and throughout the entire central mass of the sponge have i | ' | i a Fig. 26—P. lignea. a Oxea (showing the spicule’s extremities.and its diameter relatively to that of the other spicules). b Styli (of the dermal brushes). c¢ Microxea. 134 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. an approximately parallel arrangement. (The general struc- ture and arrangement of the skeleton were examined micro- scopically only in the branch-like processes; the following description 1s drawn from a rather thick median longitudinal section of one of such preserved in alcohol. Owing to the great development of spicules and their disposition, the pre- paration of a transverse section would be wholly impossible without desilicification. The structure of the main body of the sponge is apparently not essentially different from that described for the processes). Fig. 27—Faracordylalignea. Vertical section, show- ing the arrangement of the skeleton in the cortical and subcortical region. Superficially, there is a fairly well-defined layer, about 150 in thickness, densely packed with perpendicular microxea which appear to project about half their length beyond the surface. In addition, the surface is provided with brushes of fusiform styli and oxea, of much shorter length than the spicules composing the main skeleton. The components of a single bundle diverge from a point close beneath the cortex. With the exception of a sub-cortical zone about two or three millimetres wide the whole of the interior of the branch-like process is occupied by an almost solid core of longitudinally- SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 135 lisposed large oxea. The sub-cortical zone is crossed at clos aisposed large Oxea. qe sub-cortical zone 1s Crossed at Close intervals by slightly penicillate fascicles of similar spicules, which give support to: the cortical layer. The innermost spicules of these bundles emerge from between the spicules of the core; the outermost project for a considerable distance beyond the surface. ‘here are thus three orders of projecting spicules at the surface. ‘The inter-fascicular spaces of the subcortical. zone are filled-in with soft tissues containing scattered spicules and traversed by canals which in cross- section show a circular outline and a surrounding whorl of radially-disposed microxea. The largest canals occur in the deeper parts of the zone, and may attain a diameter of .6 mm. In the immediate neig hbourhood of the cortex, the canals are of capillary dimensions, and the microxea-—w hich presumably surround them—are so closely and coniusedly intermingled, that the precise inner limit of the cortex is very often difficult of determination. Megascleres.— (i.) The oxea of the inner skeleton are straight or only slightly curved symmetrical fusiform spicules attain- ing a size of 3200 x 50 #. They are usually much more than 1000 jt long, but spicules of all lengths between these larger oxea and the dermal oxea occur, and (since the asymmetry of the latter is sometimes in- appreciable) consequently no actual lower limit can be assigned to their size. Abnormalities of these spicules in the shape of styli of only about one-half their length are of extremely rare occurrence (ii.) The fusiform styli and (usually asymmetrical) oxea, which form the dermal brushes and are also to be found in small number scattered in the subcortical zone, range in length from somewhat less than 200 to slightly more than 700 #1; the largest may attain a diameter of 18 It. All intermediate grades of form between styli and oxea occur. Microscleres.— (i.) The microxea are similar in form to the largest oxea, but are about twice as stout in proportion to their length. They are rarely less than 100 #1, or more than 140 » long, and attain a diameter of slightly more than 4 pt. Occasionally spicules intermediate in size between these and the shortest dermal oxea are met with, but appear to belong rather to the latter category. ww 136 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (ii.) The amphiasters! bear at either end a terminal whorl of about six to eight rays which stand almost perpen- dicularly to the sete or are directed forwards at a small angle (up to 30°, say). The width of the spicule between the tips oF the rays, measures from about three-fourths of, to slightly less than the length of the spicule, which is rarely as much as 5 #. Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, eight miles east of San- don Bluffs, 35-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour.’’) Famity DESMACIDONIDA. Whether the Desmacidonide be divided into two sub- families, Mycaline and Ectyonine, in the usual way; or whether, in accordance with Topsent’ S proposal, the Myca- linee be sub-divided so as to yield an additional sub-family, the Dendoricinee—the result, if a natural grouping of the genera be our aim, is not altogether satisfactory. Of the two, Top- sent’s classification is the better since, with very few excep- tions as their microscleres show, the genera w hich remain in the Mycalinze after the removal of the Dendoricine stand well apart from the rest of the family. The main fault lies in the artificiality of the distinction upon which the separation of the Ectyoninee and Dendoricine is based. Species are placed in one or the other of these sub-families according as spicules of one particular kind—the accessory spicules—are present or absent, whilst no value at all is placed upon the presence or absence of the equally important ‘‘skeletal’? and ‘‘dermal’’ spicules, nor any notice taken of the plain indications afforded by the microscleres. As a consequence, we have closely allied if not almost identical genera like Ectyodoryx and Lissoden- doryx, Ectyomyxilla and Myxilla, Pocillon and lophon, Hyme- trochota and lotrochota placed, the one in the Ectyonine, the other in the Dendoricine, whilst on the other hand wholly un- related species like those of [Vilsonella and Clathria are put in a single genus without question or comment. Under these circumstances there is no advantage in maintaining these sub- divisions, and I propose therefore to merge the Dendoricin:e and Ectyoninz in a single sub-family, to be called the Myxil- line. It is probable that the My xillinge are capable of sub- division into two fairly natural groups in the way suggested below, but on this question I prefer to reserve judgment. I would, however, venture the opinion that the Myxilline are derived from a single stem distinct from that from which the great majority of the Mycaline have sprung, and from this point of view will enter upon a brief discussion of the sub- family. 1 Not Laine cnocesded in ine out the details of the structure of this spicule, I have not attempted to figure it. The rays appear to be often bifurecate and to have at times a slightly tuberculated surface. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. : w eT SUB-FAMILY MYXILLINA. The preponderance of evidence is in favour of the supposi- tion that the most primitive Myxilline possessed a type of organisation closely resembling that which obtains in Certain existing genera such as Leptosia, Hymenancora, Hymetro- chota and Hymeraphia ; and it is possible, in accordance there- with, to imagine a common ancestral form, or hypothetical ‘*Promyxilline,’’ characterised by the following features :—The sponge grew in the form of a thin encrustment, and produced in contact with the substratum a basal layer of spongin echi- nated by erect acanthostylote spicules which acted as pillars for the support of the soft structures. These spicules (which for convenience will be termed the basical megascleres) ex- hibited a tendency to differentiate into two kinds, a less spiny larger, and a more spiny smaller kind, and this was probably associated with an accompanying tendency towards an ar- rangement of the spicules in clusters, in each of which larger individuals were surrounded by smaller. Megascleres of a second kind, smooth and probably monactinal, were also present, these (which may be distinguished as auxiliary megascleres) occurred, without definite arrangement, more particularly in the superficial layers of the ‘sponge, and also formed descending strands stretching towards the sponge- base. Shonen fibres were not produced, but the pri- mordia of such, in the form of low dome- shaped elevations of the basal hoe lamina, coinciding in position with the areas occupied by the spicule- clusters, had probably made their appearance. It is difficult to say what the microscleres were, but since cheloids, sigmata, toxa and rhaphides (often in drag- mata) are found in the group, it is necessary to assume that these, or at least the forms from which they have been derived, were present. From such a hypothetical form all the different types of Myxillinee are capable of being derived. The evidence afforded by the microscleres, considered in conjunction with other facts, indicates either that a consider- able amount of evolution in various directions had been ac- complished, and that the prototypes of quite a number of different groups of co-related genera had already come into existence prior to the origin of sponginous fibres and to the 1 These spicules are commonly known as “dermal” or ‘“ectosomal”’ megascleres; but the part which they play in the conformation of the skeleton varies to such an extent in different genera that it is advisable in a comparative treatment to designate them by a term unsuggestive of position or function. The term ‘auxiliary’ is not altogether an appro- priate one, but it will suit the present purpose; the spicules to which it applies correspond for the most part, in the Myxilline, to the megascleres which Bowerbank included under the same name. I shall apply the epithet ‘dermal’ only to those spicules, of whatever category, which are specially concerned in the formation of a dermal skeleton. 138 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. assumption of an erect habit of growth, or that a return to a primitive condition on the part of more or less highly evolved species has occurred again and again within the group; other- wise it is impossible to account for the existence of groups of gener g. Hymeraphia, Microciona, Clathria and: O phlita- See gs a, Stylostichon, Ectyodoryx and Lissoden- doryx; Hymenancora, Plumohalichondria, Ectyomyxilla and Myxilla; Dragmatyle, Tedania and Acheliderma ; and others— each of which comprises a natural series connecting ‘‘promyx- illine’’ with Ectyonine and Dendoricine forms. Whilst it is probable that each of the two possible explanations contains some portion of the truth, it would seem that the former is more satisfactorily in accord with the bulk of the evidence, although it involves the assumption that, amongst the My xil- linge, sponginous fibres have originated independently many times over. If, however, as is scarcely to be doubted, such fibres have arisen as linear upgrowths of the basal spongin- lamina, there is no great improbability in such an assumption provided that there already existed in the common ancestor an incipient tendency, such as has been postulated, towards fibre- formation. Taking into account only those features which belong to the skeleton, but neglecting, for the time being, any considerations in reference to the microscleres, it may be said that nearly all of the diversities of spiculation and structure which occur in the Myxilline are ascribable to (a) modifications in the form of the megascleres and the division of either or both of the origi- nal groups of megascleres into two or more kinds; (b) differences in the arrangement and constitution of the fibres, and in connection therewith different combinations of the megascleres in respect to their particular location in the skele- ton; or (c) the loss by atrophy of one or more groups of megas- cleres formerly present. Of very common occurrence has been the differentiation of the basical megascleres into two kinds, a larger, in the case of which the primitive spination has usually undergone partial reduction or become entirely lost, and a smaller, in which it has almost invariably been retained; these may be distinguished as principal and accessory basical megascleres respectively, or simply as ‘‘principals’’ and ‘‘accessories.’’ The resultant tri- megascleric condition is that which is characteristic of normal “Ectyonine.’ ’ In many Myxilline, however, the “‘basicals’’ are only incompletely differentiated ‘and in such cases, unless (as in Crella) there be a determinable difference of function between the spicules which lie at one end of the series and those which lie at the other, it is difficult to decide whether they should-be regarded as belonging to one or to two groups (e.g. species of Stylostichon, Clathrissa, etc. ). The maximum -_—— SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 139 degree of differentiation between principal and accessory spic- ules appears to have been attained in genera like Raspailia and Echinodictyum and in those in which the microscleres are isochelze palmate and toxa, though amongst the last-men- tioned there are species (vide Clathria caelata, sp. n.) in which an unbroken transition of spicule forms occurs between the small echinating spined ‘‘accessories’’ and the large (often quite smooth) principal styli of the fibre-core. Finally, in a third group of genera, comprising the ‘‘Dendoricinz’’ and certain ‘‘Ectyonine’’ (e.g., Ophlitaspongia, Echinoclathria, Wilsonella, Agelas, etc.) the basical spicules are unequivocally of but a single kind. The iogical conclusion with regard to these is that either a differentiation of their basical spicules has never occurred or that one or the other of the resultants of such a differentiation has subsequently disappeared in the course of evolution ; in most cases, the probability is that the absence of a second kind is due to loss, inasmuch as the (basical) spicules actually present, usually exhibit, in the matter of form and function, features which are more characteristic either of prin- cipal megascleres or of accessory. The further consideration of the spicules renders it necessary to take into account other features of the skeleton, and particularly the fibres. In the Myxilline: skeletal fibres have originated in apparently two quite independent ways, viz., by the upgrowth of processes from the basal lamina, and by the ‘‘ingrowth’’ of strands of auxiliary spicules from the superficial layer. In many cases, however, the fibres are the product of both modes of forma- tion. Fibres which are wholly or partly of basal origin are, with possible exceptions, more or less sponginous and traverse ‘the whole extent of the sponge; those of purely superficial origin are, at the most, scantily provided with spongin and proceed from the surface (usually?) only for a short distance (as, for example in ‘‘Echinodictyum”’ arenosum, “‘ Plumohali- chondria’? gravida and Fusifer fistulatus).1| The former might be distinguished as basifugal, the latter as basipetal fibres. The mode of origination of basifugal fibres in the Myxilline is capable of being explained as follows :—The spongoblasts (and probably also the ‘‘basical’’ scleroblasts) which primi- tively—it may be presumed—were uniformly distributed over the surface of the basal lamina, became at particular points on it more closely aggregated. The consequent more rapid de- position of spongin at these points produced at each of them a thickening of the lamina which gradually assumed the form, say, of a papilla. Scattered over the surface of this papilla, just as over other portions of the surface of the lamina, though perhaps more closely, were scleroblasts 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, ix. (n.s.), 1897. 140 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. producing echinatingly-disposed basical megascleres. As a final step the cells, which, by their proliferation, main- tain the supply of spongoblasts and_ scleroblasts, became localised at the extremity of the papilla, the further growth of which was thereby limited to increase in length. The manner of growth of the fibre might accordingly be likened to that of a Phanerogam stem—the spongoblast- and scleroblast-produc- ing cells of the former corresponding to the apical meriste- matic cells of the latter, and the spicules, like the leaves, developing in acropetal succession. Thus at every stage of growth the fibre would be surmounted at its extremity by a ‘‘tuft’’? of newly-formed basical spicules, and it would depend almost solely upon the initial orientation of these spicules with regard to the direction of growth of the fibre, and their precise location (whether at the extreme tip of the fibre or subtermin- ally) whether they subsequently became wholly enveloped by the onwardly developing spongin as coring spicules or whether, being more or less perpendicularly disposed, they were left with only their bases imbedded in spongin, as echinating spi- cules. When the fibre-forming spicules are of a single kind the attempt to draw a distinction between coring and echinat- ing spicules is, to a great extent, artificial, and usually breaks down in practice ; as a matter of fact the spicules at the time of their formation at the growing-point of the fibre are, in a sense, all of them echinating. Accordingly Ophlitaspongia and Echinoclathria which, by common agreement, were placed in the ‘‘Ectyonine,’’ should logically have been included in the ‘“Dendoricine.’”’ The foregoing remarks concerning the mode of origin and formation of basifugal fibres apply more particularly to those of which the constituent spicules are basical megascleres only. Although fibres of this kind are the rule, there are a number of genera in which auxiliary spicules also participate in their formation and some again in which these are the only fibre- forming spicules. In these exceptional cases we may consider either that the ascending sponginous fibres have come into association with, and have enveloped in their progress the ‘“descending”’ (basipetal) strands of auxiliary spicules 31 or that in connection with the formation of the fibres, ‘‘auxiliary’’ scleroblasts have come to take a regular place amongst the cells of the fibre-growing point. From the point of view of spicular constitution merely, the skeletal fibres of the Myxil- line are referable to three main types, according as basical megascleres only, basical and auxiliary both, or auxihary megascleres only, take part in their formation. 1 In_ Aulosvongus. tubulatus, Bowbk. (Proc. Zool. Soc., 1873, p. 29; Dendy, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (6), iii., 1889, p. 29), the fibres appear to grow up in an analagous way around the tubes of commensal worms. SPONGES.--HALLMANN. IAI This introduces an interesting point in connection with the megascleres, viz., their versatility in respect to the different parts they play in different genera in the conformation of the skeleton ; and it also raises the question as to the nature of the criteria at our disposal for determining, in a given species, to which category—principal, accessory or auxiliary—the megas- cleres of each kind belong. According to my interpretation, if we take into account only the situation of the megascleres, the following types of skeleton are, amongst others, dis- tinguishable :— I.—The spicules of the fibres are ‘‘basicals’’ of one or two kinds; the ‘‘auxiliaries,’’ if (as is almost invariably the case) present, occur interstitially and dermally. (a) The ‘‘basicals’’ are of two kinds, both of which occur in connection with the fibres. (i1.) The fibres are cored by ‘“‘principals’’ and echinated by “‘accessories.’’ Normal ‘‘Ectyonine.”’ (ii.) Both kinds of “‘basicals’’ are longitudinally dis- posed in the fibres. ‘‘Clathria’’ chartacea (vide remarks on Clathria); Heteroclathria. (b) The ‘‘basicals’’ are scarcely or not at all differentiated into two groups, and echinating spicules, if present, are not distinguishable in form from the directive spicules ; or either the one kind or the other of the “‘principal’’ and ‘‘acces- sory’’ groups has been lost by atrophy. (ii.) The ‘“‘basicals’’ are imperfectly differentiated. Stylostichon. (iv.) “‘Accessories’’ are absent. Normal ‘‘Dendori- cine,’’? Ophlitaspongia, Echinoclathria. (wins Principals’; are. absent» ~ Clathria*’ mollrs:+ Paramyxilla infrequens.? I1.—The spicules composing the fibres comprise both ‘“‘basi- cals’’ and ‘‘auxiliaries ;’’ the latter, which are situated axially in the fibres also occur interstitially or dermally. (vi.) Principal and accessory spicules are well distin- guished, and both kinds are associated with the fibres. ‘‘Echinodictyum”’ ridleyi (p. 151). 1 Kirkpatrick—Marine Investigations in South Africa, ii., 1904, p. 249. 2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), vii., 1881, 369; Dendy—Report Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, ili., 1805, p p. 233. 142 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (vii.) Principal and accessory spicules are more or less well distinguished ; the former echinate the fibres, the latter are interstitial and dermal. Crella. (vili.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are scarcely or not at all differ- entiated into two kinds or are represented only by accessory spicules. Clathrissa, Plumohalichondria, Stylotellopsis, JWilsonella, Fusifer, ‘‘Echino- dictyum’’ spongiosum,! *‘E.”’ arenosum,} ‘‘ Micro- ciona’’ scabida (p. 150). (ix.) The ‘‘basicals’’ are represented only by principal spicules. Echinochalina. I11.—The fibre-forming spicules are ‘‘auxiliaries’’ only ; basical spicules, if present, are (so far as known) of a single kind, and, on account of their spination, appear to belong rather to the category of accessory than of principal mega- scleres. (x.) Basical megascleres are present. Pseudoclathria Grayella, Histodermella, Microtylotella. (xi.) Auxiliary megascleres only are present. Species of JIotrochota and Melonanchora, and_ certain species included in the Mycalinee. In the case of those Myxilline in which the megascleres are of three kinds, the homologies of the spicules are, as a rule, obvious; and almost invariably it is found that the directive or axial spicules of the fibres belong to the principal, the echinat- ing spicules to the accessory, and the interstitial or dermal to the auxiliary category of megascleres. When this mode of arrangement of the spicules obtains, or when it is departed from only through the loss of accessory spicules, the skeleton might be described as being of the normal type, since it is that in particular which is characteristic of most Myxilline. Amongst ‘‘trimegascleric’’ genera, Crella is exceptional in the fact that in it the fibres are cored by auxiliary and echinated by principal megascleres whilst the accessory occur extra-fibrally. From a study of the different forms assumed by the spicules (both megascleres and microscleres) amongst the normal Myx- illinae, we obtain much information Sich is of service in enabling us to form a conclusion concerning the identity of the megascleres i in cases where the skeleton is ‘of an anomalous or aberrant type. Thus there can be absolutely no doubt that the ‘‘skeletal’’ spicules of Melonanchora emphysema, Forcepia 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii., 1896, p. 50. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 143 colonensis,4 lotrochota coccinea? and of other species which might be mentioned, are auxiliary megascleres, and that they therefore differ from normal species of their respective genera in the absence of principal megascleres; and since we are en- abled to detect the relationships of these species only by reason of the marked peculiarities of their microscleres, it is extremely probable that a number of the species included in certain My- caline genera (e.g., Desmacidon, Amphilectus, Esperiopsis and Batzella) are similarly derived from various Myxillinee which are lacking in striking microscleric characters. Further, one feels scarcely any hesitation in asserting that the dermal spi- cules of Pseudociathria, Crella and Grayella, and the scattered spined diactinal sprcules of Histodermella, are accessory or, at any rate, undifferentiated basical megascleres; whilst the peculiar forms assumed by the accessory spicules in certain species of Icarnus, e.g., by the ‘‘cladotylostyles”’ of A. tortilis$ and the cladotylota of A. tenuis4 lead one to suspect that the microtylota of Microtylotella giintheri belong to the same cate- gory, and that this genus ought therefore to be given a place in the vicinity of Acarnus. Also, it is not altogether improb- able that the spined forcipes of Leptobasis and Forcepia are derivatives of accessory megascleres; the larger forcipes of L. arcuata5 are especially suggestive of such a derivation, and it is worthy of notice also that in the genera Crella, Gray- ella and Histodermella, which, like Forcepia and Leptobasis, possess chele arcuate, the scattered accessory spicules are frequently curved and diactinal. If the megascleres other than the accessory are of a single kind only, it is not always pos- sible to decide with certainty whether they are principal or auxiliary spicules; as a rule, however, reasons can be found, depending upon their form, in support of their identification with one, rather than with the other, of these categories. Principal megascleres, in nearly all cases in which their identity is certain, are sub-conical or more or less fusiform, somewhat curved styli, which are either quite smooth or are provided with spines over a greater or less portion of their length ex- tending from the basal extremity upwards. The auxiliary megascleres, on the other hand, are typically straight and of fairly uniform diameter, and are rarely spined except at their extremities ; in comparison with the principal spicules they are of relatively slender proportions, and in most genera are typi- cally diactinal in the fully developed state, with usually tornote, 1 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xv., 1885, p. 110. For this species Hentschel (1911) has recently proposed a new name, IL’. Michaelsent. 2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xviii., 1886, p. 378; Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii (n.s.), 1896, p. 23. 3 Topsent—Résultats Camp. Scient. Pr. de Monaco, Fasc. xxv., 1904, Dp. Lis ple xive, file. 8: 4 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii., (n.s.), 1896, p. 50. 5 Topsent—Op. cit., p. 183, pl. xv., fig. 18b. 144 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. strongylote or tylote extremities. One is inclined to think, therefore —in regard to those genera included in the Mycalinz which afford reason for believing that they are degraded Myx- illinee—that the megascleres of typical species of Desmacidon and Homeodictya are homologous with principal spicules whilst in some species at least which have been assigned to the same genera and to Amphilectus and Batzella they are homologous with auxiliary megascleres.t The presence or absence of spination on the principal spicules has been found lacking in generic value, and everything points to the fact that the spined condition is the more primitive; it is perhaps not a rare occurrence in species in which they are smooth when fully mature, that they are spined in their early developmental stages (as, for example, in Myxilla diversianc -orata?), or during the larval period of life of the sponge (as in Myxilla pedunculata’). It is a peculiar circumstance that the principal megascleres are almost invariably curved; exceptions to the rule are provided by Raspailia and its allies, but it is significant that these are also aberrant in other respects. In Ec thinodictyum and Tri- kentrion amongst the ‘‘Ectyonine,’’ and in Dendoricella and some species of other genera (e.g., lotrochota) amongst the ‘“Dendoricine,’’ they are diactinal (as in Desmacidon and Homeeodictya), and take the form of oxea or strongyla; yet they still exhibit the curvature and fusiformity which, in general, are characteristic of principal megascleres. Certain Myxillinze are possessed of more than three kinds of megascleres owing to the division of one or more of the primary groups into two kinds; and _ this division usually appears to be correlated with, and to have been the outcome of a performance by the spicules concerned of two different functions. Instances of such, in which the principal megascleres have undergone division, are provided by Echinodictyum clathratum4 and species of Ra spailia (enone vamosa, Mont., and R. tenuis, R. and D.); and in w Pea the ‘“accessories’’ have undergone division by the species of Plo- camia. That the ‘‘dumbbell’’ spicules of the last-named genus are derivatives of the accessory megascleres, the indication afforded by P. plena® leaves scarcely any room to doubt; and this species also, by reason of its possession of stunted ab- normal forms of the principal megascleres, renders it probable 1 Examples of such are provided by Homaodictya dendyi (Whit.); Des- macidon nlicatum (=D. stelliderma, Carter); D. psammodes and Ratzella inaequalis. (Hentschel, Fauna Sudwest- Australiens, Bd. iii., 1911); and by Fig. 47—C. transiens (typical form). a Prin- Fig. 47a—Clathria transiens cipal styles. b Aux- (typical form). a Accessory styles. iliary style. b Chela. ec Toxa. SPONGES.—-HALLMANN. 22) (2) Hormme(b). (Pl. xxx, fie-'2, and fies. 4g, 49a). The branches are sub-cylindrical or but slightly compressed, 5 to 7 mm. in diameter, and lie in a single plane. The main branches divide dichotomously and occasionally anatomose ; the secondary branches often extend across the interval be- tween adjoining main branches and effect a connection between them. Ihe sponge is accordingly flabellate, and consists of a reticulation of branches; it measures 120 mm. in height and 30 mm. in breadth. Wart-like prominences of irregular size and shape are scattered over the surface. As in the typical form, there is no appearance of a dermal membrane, and the colour in alcohol is pale yellowish grey; owing to the smaller size of the principal styli, however, the surface is much less distinctly hispid. aD) QO (' Fig. 48—C. tran- siens (form 6). a Fig. 48a—Clathria transiens Principal styles. b (form 6). a Accessory styles. Auxiliary tylostyle. b Chelze. c Toxa. Megascleres.— (i.) The principal styli vary in length from rio to 430 #1, but very seldom exceed 320; their maximum dia- meter is 13 }. to 32 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. (1i.) The accessory styli are commonly quite smooth, and are never distinctly spined. They range in length from 55 to very rarely more than 80, and in dia- meter up to 5}; occasional individuals up to 95 p in length have been observed. (ii.) The auxiliary tylostyli vary in length from less than 120 to 355 #, but only in extremely rare cases exceed 300 j1; maximum diameter, 4.5 p. Microscleres.— (i.) Chelee, somewhat scarce, 14 to 204 long. (ii.) Toxa, fairly plentiful, 12 to 132 in length, and rarely slightly more than 2 in diameter. Loc.—Coast of South Australia, forty miles west of Kingston, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). (2) Somme (G)-am Els xexoctlie ines. 23)) The specimen is a broken one; the largest piece of it—the subject of the figure—measures 210 mm. in length. The primary branches, which appear to have been confined more or Jess to one plane, are slightly compressed, and measure about 15 mm. broad by 10 mm. thick. The secondary branches usually arise along the lateral borders of the primaries. The characteristic surface elevations are closely approxi- mated ; in the sulci between them are the traces of an extremely thin dermal membrane. The colour in alcohol is light greyish brown. Megascleres.— (i.) The principal styli range in length from 120 to 365 #; the stoutest are 16 7 in diameter. (ii.) The accessory styli are commonly quite smooth and are never distinctly spined. They vary in length from 50 to 85, and up to 5 w in diameter. (iii.) The auxiliary tylostyli vary in length from less than 110 to rarely more than 280 1; the largest observed measured 320 x 4.54. They occur in considerable abundance. Microscleres.— (i.) Chele, rather scarce, 16 to 19 p long. (ii.) Toxa abundant, 25 to 172 in length, and up to 2 in diameter. Loc.—Coast of South Australia, forty miles west of King- ston, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 233 (4)-.F orm (d). 9(Pl: xxiv, tioe 2): The specimen now to be described is perhaps sufficiently distinguished in several respects from the three preceding to permit of its being regarded as representing a variety of the species, or even (if its differences be constant), as representing an independent species. Its chief distinctive characters are: (i.) The absence of chele; (ii.) a minute wartiness of the basal ends of the auxiliary tylostyli; and (iii. ?) a restricted range of length of the toxa. The specimen, from which the stalk (save for a small por- tion) is missing, measures 90 mm. in height. The branches are, for the most part, irregularly cylindrical, and average 7 mm. in diameter. The primary branches, as in the specimen of form (c), exhibit a kind of bilaterality expressing itself in a tendency towards a distichous arrangement upon them of the short secondary branches. The characteristic surface-eleva- tions sometimes assume the form of short ridges, but usually they are rounded and somewhat wart-like. There is a distinct but very thin dermal membrane. The colour (in alcohol) is purplish pink; this colour, however, is confined to a thin superficial layer of the sponge, the inner parts being yellowish grey. In life, the specimen was brick-red.} Megascleres.— (i.) The principal styli vary in length from 100 to 340 4, and in diameter up to 11 ww. The smallest approxi- mate extremely closely in size and shape to the acces- sory styli. and figs si.) Sponge stipitate with erect compressed branches. Oscula small, marginal. Surface even. Dermal mem- brane distinct, thin. Main skeleton an irregular reticu- lation of stout densely echinated fibres; the main fibres 1 Owing to their rarity these spicules were at first overlooked and were thus omitted from the text-figure. 2 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.). 1896, p. 32. 248 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. only, with a thin core of skeletal styli. Interstitial spicules rave. Megascleres of both kinds (the acantho- styles in lesser number) occur sparsely in the dermal membrane, together with scattered chele. Megascleres: —(i.) Skeletal, smooth substyli, 160 x 4 ; (i.) accessory acanthostyli, 96 x 8 wp. Microscleres :—Isochele arcuate 18 to 27 p long. The single specimen, preserved in alcohol, consists of a sub-cylindrical stalk (about 80mm. long by 15mm. in dia- meter) from which by two dichotomies there arise four erect slightly compressed branches. The branches are closely appressed and coalescent. Distantly separated oscula, seldom more than 1mm. in diameter, occur in an irregular series along the edges of the branches. The surface is free from inequalities.1 There is a very thin but quite distinct dermal membrane. The texture is dense; the consistency, firm and fairly tough; the colour, yellowish-brown. The total height of the specimen is 325 mm. a} je The main skeleton is an irregular, relatively small-meshed reticulation of rather stout spongin fibres (sometimes exceeding 200 # in diameter) somewhat densely echinated by short acantho- styles. In general, the area occupied ; : by the fibres themselves is greater than that of the intervening spaces. A small a proportion of the fibres are provided with a slender compact spicular core, but except in this respect there is no Fig. 51—W. curvi- evident distinction between main and chela. a Showing connecting fibres. A notable feature of basal d fet B styli An al ben the skeleton is the almost entire ab- tremity of same. b sence, except in close vicinity to the Acanthostyle. c surface, of interstitial scattered megas- Chela. cleres. The dermal membrane contains scattered megascleres of both kinds (the acanthostyles in lesser number) and fairly numerous chele ; the last-mentioned, also, are somewhat scarce in the choano- somal tissues. Megascleres.— (i.) The (auxiliary) smooth spicules are sharp-pointed cylindrical subtylostyli (or less frequently simple styli) with an elongate tylosis which usually tapers 1 The transverse ridges shown in the figure were produced by an en- twining sea-weed. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 249. more or less towards its extremity. Quite com- monly the basal extremity of the spicule is either abruptly or acuminately pointed, and the spicule ac- cordingly sometimes passes into an asymmetrical oxea. The length varies from 140 to 170 and the maximum diameter is 4}. (ii.) The (accessory) acanthostyles are sub-conical, with moderately large, irregularly scattered, recurved spines. They are rarely less than 60 long and attain a size of 96 x 8y. Microscleres.— The chelze (isochele arcuate) vary from about 18 to 27 in length ; except for a greater curvature of the shaft in the case: of the shorter spicules there is no appreciable difference in form between the longest and the shortest. In their earliest stage of development they appear as a slender, slightly curved rod; the ale are well advanced in development before the rudiment of the front palm makes its appearance. At a certain stage of their growth many bear a rather close resemblance to. the longest of the three chelaee shown in text-figure 52a for Wilsonella oxyphila. Loc.—Coast of South Australia; (?) fifteen miles south of St. Francis Island (‘‘Endeavour.’’) WILSONELLA OXYPHILA, sp. nov. (Plate xxxiv., fig. 3; and figs. 52, 52a.) Sponge flabellate, simple or proliferous. (?) Oscula small, marginal. Surface even, or with faint radiating grooves, or areolately pitted. Dermal membrane dis- tinct, thin. Main skeleton an irregular reticulation of moderately slender, closely echinated fibres, with a slender core of skeletal spicules. Interstitial spicules scarce. Megascleres of both kinds (the accessory in lesser number) are sparsely scattered in the dermal mem- brane, together with frequent chele. Megascleres :— (i.) Skeletal smooth substyli, 200 x 3 yw; (u.) accessory acanthostyli and (occasional) acanthoxea, 80 x 4.5 i. Microscleres: —Isochele arcuate, approaching the palmate form, 16 to 26 yw long. Introductory Remarks.—There are two specimens which I assign to this species. In their external appearance there 1s nothing that would suggest a specific identity, but they agree so perfectly in their spicular characters that one hesitates to separate them even as different varieties. Accordingly I have thought it best, whilst uniting them under a single name, to: ! | 250 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. keep their descriptions separate. The specimen which, on account of its better preservation, I select as typical of the species, is divided longitudinally into two equal portions; one portion has been retained in spirits, the other was removed and preserved in a dry state. Asa result of its drying the latter has undergone a remarkable amount of shrinkage, being now scarcely more than one-half its former size.1 The second specimen is both macerated and dry. Description.— (a) Typical Specimen. ‘The speci- men, when complete, had the form of an oval leaf-shaped plate, with the narrower end drawn out into a short stalk, and measured 120 mm. in height, 90 mm. in greatest breadth and 8 to ro mm. in thickness. Both surfaces exhibit a number of obscure, longitudinal, somewhat radiately disposed grooves which become more distinct towards the margin. ‘These grooves are apparently due to the presence of canals lying immediately beneath the thin dermal membrane which have caused the latter to undergo a slight collapse. Owing to the somewhat damaged state of the Fig. 52—W. oxyphila. surface, it is impossible to speak with Showing variations of the Certainty regarding oscula; it ap- opposite extremities of G : the smooth megascleres. PEars that the canals terminate along the margin of the plate in small circular openings. The main skeleton is a reticulation of slender fibres which are fairly closely echinated by small acanthostyles. The main fibres contain a slender compact spicular core; the connecting fibres interreticulate to a slight extent and are destitute of axial spicules. Owing to the paleness of the spongin, the main fibres, by reason of their axial spicules, stand out rather conspicuously in comparison with the connecting fibres, so that at first glance the skeleton might appear to be dendritic; the false impression is, however, immediately corrected by the presence of echinating spicules on the connecting fibres. Both 1 The piece was subsequently returned to alcohol and expanded again. almost to its original size. SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 251 kinds of megascleres, in very small number, are scattered through the ground tissues and dermal membrane. Chelz are fairly abundant in the dermal membrane, or at least in some portions of it; but are rare in the interior. Megascleres.— (i.) The smooth (auxiliary) spicules show all gradations in form between elongately-‘‘headed’’ subtylostyli and asymmetrical oxea; they are rarely less than 140 #, and usually between 160 and 170 } in length, whilst their maximum size is about 200 x 3 pH. (ii.) The spined accessory spi- cules are styli and oxea of a similar dimensions, — the latter occurring in relatively small number. The spines are small, and_ scattered over the whole length of the spicule. The maximum size is 80 x 5 #; the length is rarely less than 50 » and Fig. 52a—W. oayphila. seldom more than 70 }. a Chel. b Acanthostyli. Microscleres.— Isochele of slightly variable shape, ranging in length from 20 to 26. Asarule, as seen in profile their form approaches that of palmate isochele, but the shafe is slightly curved and makes a rather wide angle with the sront palm; a small pro- portion bear a close resemblance to arcuate isochele. Their mode of development, however, indicates that their relation- ship is rather with the arcuate type of chela. In their earliest developmental stage they appear as a slender, slightly curved rod; the rudiments of the ale next make their appearance, ex- tending along the shaft at either end for about one-third of its length; and finally the front palm is added. In the case of quite an appreciable number of the chela—which otherwise attain to full proportions and indeed are usually somewhat longer than the average—the palm remains relatively small and the spicule then often bears a striking resemblance to in- completely developed chele of Wilsonella curvichela. The normal form is that of the shortest of the three chela shown in the adjoining text figure, though the spicule is usually not so robust. 252 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Loc.—Near Kangaroo Island, South Australia, 17 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). (b). W. oxyphila, var.? (Plate xxxiv., fig. 3). The different appearance presented by the second specimen is partly due to its intense purplish colour, and perhaps partly also to its dry macerated condition. The colour difference is of little consequence since it probably results from the presence of a symbrotic alga similar to that which affects certain other Australian species, notably Chalina polychotoma, Carter, Arenochalina mirabilis (Lendf.), Whitelegge,! and Echino- clathria ramosau, sp. nov. In shape (Pl. xxxiv., fig. 3) it is not materially different from the typical specimen. It consists of a stipitate flabelli- form plate (170 mm. in height and about the same in breadth, and 6 to 8mm. thick) to which are added, mainly on one side, a few lamelliform outgrowths, joined to it along vertical lines.. The washed-out condition of the specimen is most unsatis- factory from many points of view for the purpose of full and accurate description, but in this case it possesses the ad- vantage of permitting the rather characteristic gross structure of the skeleton to be readily perceived. I have not been able to convince myself that the type specimen, if macerated, would. show a similar structure. The surface is everywhere irregu- larly covered with shallow, roughly polygonal or rounded honeycombcell-like pits on an average 2 mm. in diameter, and more or less distinctly arranged in longitudinal series running from the base to the margin of the plate. Where the sponge is thin, the ‘‘cells’’ may completely perforate it; when the 1 From an examination of a section which I have prepared of a frag- ment of a British Museum specimen labelled ‘ Arenochalina mirabilis: Lendenfeld, Torres Straits,’ and a comparison of its skeletal structure with that figured by Lendenfeld (Zool. Jahrb., 1387. taf. xxvii., fig. 28). I feel sure that this specimen is truly representative of Lendenfeld’s species. I find, also, that Whitelegge’s Arenochalina mirabilis, from Port Jackson, is closely allied to, if not identical with, the same species. Lendenfeld’s description is accordingly wrong in stating that the megas- cleres are oxea; they are slightly fusiform subtylostyli with relatively large axial canal. Whether the typical 4A. mirabilis possesses chele or not I am unable to say, since, in the fragment referred to, owing to its washed-out condition, interstitial spicules are entirely absent. However, in the Port Jackson sponge there occur scattered anisochele palmate of simple form, and, since the close relationship of this sponge to Lenden- feld’s is beyond doubt, one can therefore say that the genus Arenochalina possesses the spiculation of Mycale, and that it will probably form one of the sub-genera into which the latter genus will no doubt ultimately be subdivided. The external resemblance of Arenochalina mirabilis to Spongelia elegans (c.f.. Whitelegge—Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., pl. x., fig. 7, and Lendenfeld—Monogr. Horny Sponges, pl. xxxix., fig. 2) is so striking that it almost casts doubt on Lendenfeld’s record of the occurrence of the: latter species in the same area as the former, viz., at Broken Bay, New South Wales. ‘ SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 253 sponge is held up before the light, the partition between the rows of ‘‘cells’’ appear as ribs traversing the sponge longi- tudinally in a slightly radiating fashion. The consistency is fairly soft and slightly brittle. The fibres are so densely surrounded by pigmented matter that the section required to be decolorised in order to bring them into view. The colour dissolves out in nitric acid as a bright carmine which soon disappears, particularly on warm- ing. ‘The skeleton differs from that of the preceding specimen in its much greater irregularity, but this is probably more apparent than real and due to the fact that the connecting fibres—owing to the dry state of the specimens and the conse- quent absence of interfibral substance-—are no less conspicuous than the connecting fibres. In all other respects the two sponges appear to be identical. Loc.—Oyster Bay, Tasmania, 20-40 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). A ES) SY san} Assuming the descriptions of Clathria elegantula, Ridley and Dendy, and Clathria piniformis, Carter,! to be correct in detail, it might be said that WV. oxyphila forms a connecting link between them. The three species agree very closely in their characters; but oxeote modifications of the megascleres have not been mentioned for C elegantula, nor have chelz been recorded for C. piniformis. It is, however, quite possible that the typical specimen of W. oxyphila may prove to belong to Carter’s species, and the varietal specimen, to Ridley and Dendy’s. GENUS OPHLITASPONGIA, Bowerbank. In view of the existence of such a species as Clathria tran- siens, sp. nov.—in one of the forms of which, the accessory styli are smooth—the definition of Ophlitaspongia, as pro- posed by Dendy,? needs amendment so as to restrict the genus to species whose echinating and coring spicules (if both be present) are similar or, at any rate, not definably different. The amendment will probably necessitate the removal of O. membranacea, Thiele (vide p. 215), to Clathria; but, so far as I know, it affects no other species of the genus. The definition requires also to be modified in such a way as to clearly dis- tinguish the genus from Echinochalina (q.v.). Ophlitaspongia has commonly been spoken of as differing from Clathria in the 1 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 354; Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. (n.s.), vili., 1896, p. 34. 2 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 36. 254 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. smoothness of its echinating spicules; in its restricted sense, it will be more correct to say of the genus that it differs from Clathria in the absence of accessory spicules. The genus is, however, a very generalised one and such species as might be included in it are capable of derivation from a number of different genera. Owing to such species as Clathria transiens, Echinochalina intermedia, Whitelegge, O. tenuis, Carter, O. tubulosa, sp. n., and O. nidificata, Kirkpatrick,! the task of satisfactorily de- fining Ophlitaspongia is rendered rather difficult. With the exception of O. nidificata (for which almost unquestionably a new genus should be established) the species of which I have information seem to require some such definition as the follow- ing: “‘External form various, but never regularly honey- combed. Skeleton a reticulation of usually well-developed horny fibre which is cored or echinated, or both cored and echinated by smooth basical! styli (sometimes accompanied by oxeote modifications). The basical styli, which are typically of a single kind, may exhibit some degree of differentiation into two kinds, but there is never any definable difference of form between those which core and those which echinate, the fibres. Monactinal auxiliary spicules, occurring interstitially and in the dermal layer, are typically present. Microscleres, if present, are isochele palmate and (or) toxa.’’ In O. papilla, Bowbk., the type-species, and in O. seriata, Bowbk., the fibres are said to be provided only with echinating spicules. In the species described in the present paper the echinating spicules are relatively few in number and, to some extent, accidental in the occurrence; they are, in fact, precisely analagous to the spicules (of common occurrence in the genus Clathria) which in the case of C. partita I have referred to as ‘‘quasi-echinating’’ spi- cules. That such spicules are, in some cases at least, to be regarded as, in a sense, accidental, is evident from the following considerations. (i.) In the species in which these occur, the (principal) spicules are not confined to the fibres only, but also occur in the ground substance; it is quite to be expected, therefore, that some proportion of them should be found to occupy an intermediate situation, i.e., partly within, and partly projecting from the fibre. (ii.) The formation of spicules at the growing-point of the fibre pre- cedes their envelopment by spongin, and since these terminal spicules are often spread penicillately, it follows that outlying 1 Kirkpatrick—Nat. Antarctic Exped., iv., 1908, Tetraxonida, p. 25. 2 Vide pp. 137, 138. SBPONGES.—HALLMANN. un SW Fo) individuals may sometimes be left only partially included ‘within the completed fibre. (iii.) Owing to the continued growth in stoutness of a fibre, spicules originally lying ex- ternally, but in close proximity to it, might secondarily come to be surrounded at their basal extremity by the fibre-spongin. (iv.) In the superficial regions of the sponge, spicules which appear as if echinating, are often nothing more than the axial spicules of incipient connecting fibres; this occurs most frequently when the connecting fibres are unispicular. (v.) It sometimes happens that the development of a connecting fibre —say, an unispicular fibre—proves abortive, the fibre then appearing as a process from its supporting main fibre; in such a case, if the process were very short, its axial spicule would appear to echinate the main fibre. In the species of Ophlitaspongia described herein, the echi- nating spicules appear to arise in one or other of the ways andicated. Dendy! has remarked that his Siphonochalina bispiculata resembles an Ophlitaspongia save in the fact that the spicules .are oxea; perhaps this species should be placed in the genus Diplodemia, Bowerbank. OPHLITASPONGIA CONFRAGOSA, Sp. nov. (Plate xxxv., fig. 2, and fig. 53.) Sponge small, delicate; of indeterminate habit; probably consisting, in most cases, of compressed up- growths arising from a thin encrusting base. Oscula indistinguishable, perhaps absent. Skeleton an irregular sub-renieroid reticulation of thin pauci- or uni-spicular spongin-fibres, with meshes the sides of which are usually of not more than a spicule’s length. Quasi- echinating spicules are of occasional occurrence. Aux- iliavy spicules are scattered interstitially—in some parts, sparsely; in others, in dense profusion. Megascleres :— (i.) Straight or (seldom) slightly curved principal styli, cylindrical throughout the greater portion of their length, slightly inflated at the base and gradually tapering to a point, attaining a size of 190 x 12 pl; (il.) auxiliary sub- tylostyli with a maximum size of 300 x 5.5 #. Micro- scleres :—(i.) Palmate isochele 10 yt long; (iti.) bow- shaped toxa, 80 x 3 # in maximum size. 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vii. (n.s.), 1895, p. 246. “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. The single specimen, preserved in a dry state, is a small sponge of indefinite shape growing dispersedly over the fronds of a foliaceous calcareous Bryozoan. It consists in part of a thin spreading layer closely in- vesting the surface of the fronds,. and in part of irregular com- pressed outgrowths arising along their margins. The lamellar portions of the sponge (which constitute by far the greater portion of its bulk) have an uneven, irregularly undulat- ing surface, and, owing to vary- ing rates of growth at different points, an irregularly lobed and broken margin; they vary from b B 1 to 3 mm. in thickness, are indefinite in width, and attain, in the present instance, a maxi- a mum height of 50 mm. Owing to incomplete coalescence be- tween the marginal lobes as growth proceeds, the lamelle are frequently fenestrate. There are no certain indications of oscula. The surface is minutely ( porous. The colour is yellowish- grey; the consistency firm, com- pressible, slightly brittle; the texture, finely fibrous. The main skeleton is a web- like sub-renieroid irregular re-- ticulation of pale slender horny fibres with pauciserially or uni- serially arranged axial spicules (principal styli). The precise formation of the skeleton is diffi- cult of determination ; apparently there is a primary reticulation of stouter fibres, the meshes Fig. 53—O. contragosa. a of which are occupied by a Fe ce Ate: eae second DE Sy interreticulum | of ‘ mostly unispicular connecting fibres. The outlines of the stouter fibres are vague, and the arrangement of their spicules. is disorderly; they seldom exceed gop in diameter. The (usually single) spicules forming the sides of the angular meshes of the interreticulum are probably always surrounded. SPONGES._HALLMANN. 257 by a layer of spongin; but this is often so thin as to be indis- cernible, and in such cases the spicules sometimes appear as if echinating. Quasi-echinating spicules are also of common occurrence on the more superficial fibres; these, in some if not all cases, mark the starting-points of new fibres. Scattered (auxiliary) subtylostyli occur interstitially, in some parts sparsely, in other parts in great abundance. Megascleres.— (i.) Principal styli straight, usually slightly expanded at the base, very nearly cylindrical throughout about three-fourths of their length and tapering thence to a sharp point, ranging in length from about 130 to 190 zx, and with a maximum diameter of 12 j. (ui.) Straight auxiliary subty lostyli or styli, 130 to 300 yp in length and 6 # in maximum diameter. -Microscleres.— (i.) Isochelee palmate, fairly plentiful, 10 long. (ii.) Toxa, comparatively scarce, in shape somewhat re- sembling the conventional bow of archery; length, 25 to 80; diameter of the stoutest, 3 p. Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, Shoalhaven Bight, 15-45 fms. (“‘Endeavour’’). OPHLITASPONGIA SUBHISPIDA, Carter. (Plate xxxvi., fig. 1; and fig. 52.) 1885. Echinoclathria subhispida, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. list(S), xVi., 1888, p. 350: Echinoclathria gracilis, Carter, Loc. cit., p. 356. 1896. Ophlitaspongia subhispida, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. (n-s.), viit:, 1896, p. 36. Sponge stipitate, with slender usually somewhat flattened branches which multiply dichotomously or (occasionally) polytomously, and extend, with or without anastomosis, in the same or in overlapping planes. Dermal membrane absent, or, at any rate, indistinct. Oscula not visible. Skeleton a regular scalariform reticulation of strongly developed horny fibres; the main fibres contain a discrete paucispicular core, the transverse fibres are without con- tained spicules. Principal styli are tolerably abundant in the ground substances and common as echinating Principal styli. b Auxiliary tylostylus. c Toxa. “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. spicules. Scarce auxiliary spicules are scattered inter- stitially. Megascleres :—(i.) Principal styli, usually more or less curved, sub-fusiform, with a slight sub-basal waist, varying in length from about 50 (seldom less than 80) to 155 p, and in diameter up to 5.5 pw; (i.) auxiliary tylostyli, straight or in variable manner curved, 100 (or less) to 250 pw in length, and rarely as muchas 1.5 ¢ in diameter. Microscleres :—Toxa, by no means scarce, 30 to 80 win length and never more than 1 « in diameter. The external form of this species has already been suff- ciently well described, but no adequate account of the skeleton: has so far been rendered; also, the information concerning the spicules is incomplete, and, to some extent, misleading. The | specimen herein figured measures 100 mm. in height. The skeleton is a very regular reticulation of densely horny fibres, which are of a b a pale brownish tint and (except in proximity to the sponge-surface) rarely less than 70 or more than: , 100 # in diameter ; the main fibres. | contain a meagre wispy core of slender styli, the connecting fibres are vacant. As seen in median longitudinal section of a branch, the main fibres run longitudinally (in subparallelism, and from 80 to 120 p apart) with a slight outward trend which gradually increases to a curvature as the exterior is | approached, and arrive at the surface at an inclination to it varying (in different parts of the sponge) from about 45° to nearly go°; they are joined at irregular intervals, in a scalariform fashion, by the short, stout transverse fibres. The meshes») off) the reticulation have their angles ee Fig. 54—O. subhispida. a rounded off, and are usually elongated in the longitudinal direction; they vary in shape from circular to oblong. Owing to the absence of a dermal membrane, the free ex- tremities of the main fibres give to the surface an appearance of hispidity. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 259 Styli similar to those which core the fibres, 7.e., principal styli, occur in moderate number, both as echinating and as interstitial spicules; when interstitial, they are for the most part disposed parallely to the main fibres. Scattered between the fibres also, are a small number of very slender (auxiliary) tylostyli. The echinating spicules appear to be most abundant on the superficial fibres ; but the majority of those which occur in that situation are partly or completely invested by a sheath of spongin and are evidently nothing more than the rudiments of developing new fibres. According to Carter’s description the echinating spicules are of a different kind to those which core the fibres—but this is not so; for although the former are perhaps, on the average, of smaller size than the latter, yet between the two there is absolutely no difference of shape. Accordingly, it would be incorrect to suppose that O. sub- hispida bears any close. relationship to such a sponge as Clathria transita, form (d), (p. 233), in which the echinating styli, although quite smooth, are quite distinct from the principal spicules. Loc.—Port Philip, Victoria (Carter; Dendy; Austr. Mus. Cole): OPHLITASPONGIA SUBHISPIDA, Carter, VAR. VIMINALIS, Lendenfeld. (Plate xxxvi., fig. 1, and fig. 55.) 1888. Thalassodendron viminalis, Lendenfeld, Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 225. 1902. Thalassodendron viminalis, Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus. iv., 5, 1902, p. 214. [1g01. Not Thalassodendron viminalis, Whitelegge, Op. cit., IV962,, TOOL, p. 87.\| My acquaintance with this sponge is limited to a single dry specimen (the one described by Whitelegge, and herein figured) which in outward form approaches, and in internal characters —except in regard to the size and, to some extent, to the shape of its spicules—exactly resembles O. subhispida. Indeed, the differences between the two are not so great that they might not be due to individual variation; but in order to establish this point further material is required. The description which I have given of the skeleton pattern of O. subhispida is here again applicable without qualification. and as regards the external features, Whitelegge’s account will suffice. The latter author’s description of the skeleton is slightly misleading in one respect, inasmuch as it conveys the 260 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. “ impression that the fibres ‘‘which curve gracefully outwards and terminate at the surface’’ are branches arising from the stouter main fibres of the ‘‘axial plexus’’ (as for example in Clathria arcuophora), whereas, as a matter of fact, they appear rather to be direct continuations of those fibres. The description also errs in attempting to fix precise limits to the diameters of the axial, superficial and transverse fibres. The principal styli vary in length from about 75 to 220 p, and in diameter up to 8 or (very rarely) 9 y; generally speaking, they agree in form with those of O. subhispida but are somewhat peculiar in the fact that a _ considerable proportion (usually of the stouter individuals) are wanting in the slight basal swelling or knob charac- teristic of the latter, and thus have the basal ex- tremity shaped somewhat like the handle of an oar. However, I find that this peculiarity is also occa- sionally exhibited, though Fig. 55—Ophlitaspongia subhispida, in a less marked degree, var. viminalis. a Principal styli by the spicules of O. sub- (selected) showing in varying degree BG . the basal peculiarity. b Auxiliary hispida, and is therefore of tylostyli. doubtful value as a dis- tinctive character of the variety. The auxiliary spicules are slender, usually curved or flexuous tylostyli which seldom exceed 200 7 in length, and appear to be never more than 1 in diameter; the longest observed measured 240}. In O. subhispida also, it should be noted, the auxiliaries are sometimes flexuous. The toxa are similar in form to, and (except for a slighter stoutness) of the same dimensions, as those of O. subhispida. Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, Illawarra (Austr. Mus. Colle): SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 261 OPHLITASPONGIA TENUIS, Carter. "(Plate xxxv., fig. 1, and fig..'56-) to) 1885. Echinoclathria tenuis, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.(5), Viel GSS Ps 355: 1886. Phakellia papyracea, Carter, Op. cit. (5), xvili., 1886, P= 379: 1896. Ophlitaspongia tenuis, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., Willa (Mss >) OGOs paraze [Not Clathria tenuis, Hentschel, Fauna Siidwest- Australiens, Tetraxonida, ii., 1911, p. 377. | [ 1887. (?) Antherochalina tenuispina, Lendenfeld, Zool. Jahrb. 1887, p. 780. | Sponge flabelliform, thin, stipitate. Surface even. Oscula apparently absent. No dermal membrane. Skeleton: In young parts of ithe sponge, spongin being yet but scantily developed, the skeleton appears as a more or less ‘‘venieroid’’ reticulation which, in the mid- region of the lamina, is irregularly isodictyal, but which, in vicinity to the surface (owing to the presence there of outwardly-running paucispicular fibres), becomes generally rectangular; usually, also, longitudinally dis- posed sheaves of spicules, lying in the mid-region, pro- duce an appearance of axial condensation. Later, there is developed in the mid-region a dense plexus of stout horny fibres which to some extent obscure, and perhaps in part ensheath, the spicules of the “‘isodictyal’’ mesh- work; with increase of age, also, the lamina thickens, the excurrent fibres are correspondingly prolonged, and the rectangularly-meshed outer layer is consequently of greater width. Auxiliary tylostyli are scattered inter- stitially in variable number, generally singly, but also in bundles. Quasi-echinaling (principal) styli are, as a rule, moderately scarce. Megascleres:—(i.) Curved tapering principal styli, typically more or less fusiform and basally manubriate or sub-basally constricted, showing signs of a slight differentiation into two kinds, ranging in length from about 75 to upwards of 240 p, and varying in maxi- mum diameter in different specimens from & to 12 y; (ii.) auxiliary tylostyli, straight or flexuous, with a length of from 160 to upwards of 250 p, and a maximum diameter of 3.5 #. Microscleres absent. 262 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. This species is represented in the Australian Museum col- lection by eight specimens, the largest of which measures Fig. 56—O. fenuts. a Principal styli. b Auxiliary tylostylus. (From a Port Phillip specimen.) 250 mm. in height by about the same in breadth, and varies in thickness from 2 mm. at the margin, where it is thinnest, to a maximum of 5.5 mm. Smaller specimens are proportionately thinner. The lamina is, frequently, irregularly subdivided in a partite manner, and its margin is sometimes lobate. In most specimens, more or less distinct external indications of intermittent growth are noticeable; Carter no doubt refers to these when he describes the surface (of Phakellia papyracea) as ‘‘concentrically lineated.”’ The skeleton is condensed along radiating branched lines, and _ also, owing to continued development of spongin, greatly increases in density with increase of age; accordingly, sec- tions taken from different portions of the same specimen may differ consider- ably in the pattern which they reveal. In consequence of the linear condensa- tions of the skeleton, the marginal re- gion of the sponge lamina, if sufficiently thin to be at all translucent, usually shows to the naked eye an appearance of subparallel venation—-the ‘‘veins’’ being, on an average, rather less than I mm. apart. These veins are found to be due to the presence of abundant longitudinally disposed spicules, mostly arranged in bundles. In the youngest, or marginal portions of the sponge, before any readily notice- able amount of spongin is developed, the skeleton (except in proximity to the surface) is an irregular ‘‘renieroid’’ reticulation with triangular to polygonal meshes, the sides of which are formed, as a rule, each of a single spicule enveloped in a minimum amount of spongin. Towards the surface, how- ever, excurrent pauciserial spongin-ensheathed lines of somewhat plumosely arranged spicules (secondary fibres) SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 263 make their appearance, which become more distinct as the surface is approached and terminate each in a few pro- jecting spicules. In longitudinal section, perpendicular to the sponge lamina, these fibres are seen to be arranged pinnately with regard to the mid-line of the section; and since they usu- ally lie closely, and are then connected by short (mostly unispicular) transverse fibres, the skeleton in its superficial portions becomes for the most part rectangular in mesh. Thus, the pattern of the skeleton changes in passing outwards from the mid-plane to the surface, from more or less irregularly ‘“‘isodictyal’’ to more or less ‘‘scalariform.’’ The isodictyal pattern of the mid-region is, however, in most sections, to some extent obscured or interrupted by the dense spicular ag- gregations constituting the ‘‘veins’’ above referred to. In older portions of the sponge, the skeleton presents a quite different aspect, owing mainly to the presence, in the mid- region of the lamina, of a dense plexus of stout horny fibres. These appear to be quite analogous to the primary fibres of such species as Clathria arcuophora and C. frondosa, and ac- cordingly might be so designated, although they are subse- quent in order of formation to those which have been termed ‘*secondary’’ or excurrent fibres. In contrast with the latter fibres, which are pale-coloured, the primary fibres are of a deep yellowish tint and are generally aspiculous: as the latter fact indicates, they arise, for the greater part at least, inde- pendently of the “‘isodictyal’’ spicular meshwork occupying the same region. Apparently, they are earliest developed in connection with the radial venations above referred to—the intermediate belts remaining for some time unaffected; ulti- mately, however, the plexus which they form extends in the mesial plane continuously. In sections from the marginal region, it is seldom that primary fibres are sufficiently developed to be distinguished ; but such sections often show, in the place of these, a yellowish colouration suggestive of diffused spongin. The different appearance of the skeleton (as seen in longi- tudinal section perpendicular to the lamina) in the older portions of the sponge, is due also to the increased width (con- sequent upon the growth in thickness of the lamina, and in length of the secondary fibres) of the rectangularly-meshed superficial layer extending between the mesial or ‘“‘plexal’’ region and the surface; and, furthermore, the secondary fibres and their connectives are here provided with a well-developed sheath of spongin. In the older parts of the sponge, therefore, there is nothing in the character of the skeleton to warrant the statement (which Dendy has made) that ‘‘The species is in- teresting because it shows a structure intermediate betweer 264 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. the Ectyoninz and the Axinellide, so that it might, with almost equal justice, be placed in either group.’’ The principal megascleres are slightly differentiated (but are not separable) into two kinds as regards size, though not to any appreciable extent as regards shape. The larger—which are the less numerous—occur chiefly as coring spicules in the excurrent or secondary fibres and as longitudinally directed interstitial spicules in the mesial region of the sponge. Quasi- echinating spicules are most commonly met with in connection with the secondary fibres and their connectives ; the frequency of their occurrence varies greatly in different specimens, and in some they are comparatively rare. The auxiliary megascleres (tylostyli) also vary in abundance, though they are never by any means scarce: they are, for the most part, scattered singly and lie parallel to the fibres; but parallel bundles—chiefly con- fined to the mid-region of the lamina and_ longitudinally disposed—also occur. The spicule characters are as follows :-— (i.) The principal megascleres are straight to curved, grad- ually tapering; styli, of very variable length in any given specimen, and in different specimens differing to some extent in regard to their precise form and maximum size. In the specimen from which the spicules shown in the text figure were drawn, and in a mounted slide prepared from a piece of a British Museum specimen labelled Echinoclathria tenuis, they almost invariably exhibit a handle-like basal part (suggestive of the handle of an oar), about to to 20 in length, which may or may not expand slightly at the end of the spicule to form a faint basal knob. In some specimens obtained by the ‘‘En- deavour,’’ on the other hand, the spicules approach very closely in form those of O. inornata, sp. nov. (text-fig. 57), and only a small proportion of them are marked by a ‘“‘handle’’ which, even so, is usually not well defined. In the first- mentioned specimen, in which these spicules are of slenderer proportions than in any of the others, they range from about 70 to 280 (but are very seldom more than 240) » in length, and are at most 8 in diameter ; whilst in the last-mentioned speci- mens, in which their size is greatest, they range in length from 80 to 310 and attain a maximum diameter of 12. The largest spicules are mostly to be found amongst those which project at the surface. Oxeote modifications, which appear to be always of lesser than the medium length, are of oc- casional occurrence. Usually, amongst the shorter spicules (of length below, say, 130 4) there are some with a few (seldom more than one or two) spine-like prominences ; these (vestigi- ally spined?) spicules appear to occur most frequently in SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 265 stouter-spiculed specimens, but in any case they are scarce and in the first-mentioned two specimens have not been observed. (ii.) The auxiliary tylostyli are normally straight, but in some specimens a considerable proportion, perhaps even a majority, are variously flexed. They range in length from less than 160 to (usually) slightly more than 300; their greatest observed length in any specimen was 350}. I have quoted Antherochalina tenuispina, Lendenfeld, as a probable synonym of O. tenuis on the evidence of a small piece of a British Museum specimen labelled with the name and locality (viz., Western Port, Victoria) of Lendenfeld’s species. As the fragment conforms in external features with Lendenfeld’s description, I have but little doubt that the name attached to it is the correct one, and would say, therefore, that in respect of its spicular characters A. tenuispina has been wrongly described. In some features of the skeleton QO. tenuis resembles Clathria (?) chartacea, Whitelegge (vide p. 208)—a species from which, externally, it appears to be indistinguishable. Locs.—Port Philip, 18-20 fms. (Carter; Dendy; Austr. Mus. Coll.); forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). OPHLITASPONGIA INORNATA, Sp. nov. (Plate xxxvi., fig. 2, and fig. 57:) Sponge stipitate, ramose; branches short and crooked, mostly confined to one plane, sometimes anastomosing. No apparent dermal membrane. Oscula doubtfully present. Skeleton: In the older parts of the sponge, the axial region of the branches ts occupied by a dense plexus of stout, generally aspiculous, horny fibres, by a pro- fusion of longitudinally-disposed extrafibral spicules (principal styli) arranged in loose bundles and strands, and by single spicules which, though generally scattered without order, appear in places as if arranged reticulately. From the axial region there run outwards and upwards to the surface, fibres with divergingly disposed and fre- > quently echinating spicules which, at the.extremity of the fibre, form a projecting tuft; these fibres are joined by transverse and interreticulating paucispicular connecting fibres forming with them rectangular and polygonal 266 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. meshes with sides of a spicule’s length. All the spicules afore-mentioned are principal styli; auxiliary tylostyli are scattered in moderate number in the ground substance of the interior, but become rather abundant in parts of the outermost layer. In the youngest portions of the sponge the skeleton differs from this mainly in absence of an axial fibre-plexus. Megascleres:—(i.) Principal styli curved, subconical to slightly fusiform, usually with a slight sub-basal waist and slight basal knob, ranging in length from 75 to 220 pt, and in diameter up to 12 p; (ii.) straight auxiliary tylostyli, 140 to 240 p in length, 2.5 u in maximum diameter. Microscleres absent. The single (spirit-preserved) specimen, the form of which is sufficiently indicated by the figure (Pl. xxxvi., fig. 2), measures 90 mm. in height, inclusive of the stalk. The colour is yellowish-grey ; the consistency moderately firm and tough. Scattered over the surface at fairly close though irregular intervals, are minute rounded openings mostly less than $ mm. in diameter. These are scarcely discernible on some parts of the surface, very noticeable on others, being most pronounced where apparently maceration has occurred; it is therefore probable that they are subdermal. No dermal membrane, however, is observable; this may be due to imperfect preserva- tion, yet the membrane, if originally present, must have been very thin. Towards the upper extremity of the branches a few larger openings (up to 1 mm. in diameter) occur, which are possibly oscula. The appearance of the skeleton undergoes a marked change with increase of age owing to the formation in the axial region of the branches of a dense plexus of horny fibres. In this respect the species is quite analogous to O. tenuis, to which very probably it is related. The character of the skeleton in the older portions of the sponge is so similar in the two species, that what has been said in regard thereto in the case of O. tenuis is also applicable in the present instance, except- ing that here the extrafibral spicules of the axial region are more abundant, the reticulation formed by the secondary and their connecting fibres is less regular, the coring spicules of the fibres are arranged in an axinelloid manner, echinating spi- cules are plentiful, and auxiliary megascleres are rather scarce. The formation of the axial plexus, however, appears to be much longer delayed in the present species, being clearly marked only in the stalk and the basal portions of the branches. In the upper region of the branches, for a considerable por- tion of their length, the skeleton is composed chiefly of SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 267 abundant longitudinally-directed (principal) spicules for the most part arranged in close multispicular fibre-like strands, the appearance and disposition of which is such that, at first sight, they might be mistaken for main skeletal fibres, their resem- blance to the latter being heightened by the fact that the spicules composing them are held together by some amount of yellowish spon- ginous material. In addition < to these spicular strands, however, though more or less concealed by them ex- cept towards the surface, there is a _ reticulation of longitudinal (main) and transverse (connecting) slen- der horny fibres with pauci- serially-arranged coring, and frequent echinating, spicules; the _ transverse a a a b fibres are usually of not more than a spicule’s length. Owing to the partial con- cealment of the primary fibres proper, by the dense array of longitudinal spi- cules, it is with the strands which these spicules form, rather than with the main fibres, that the transverse fibres appear to reticulate. Finally, there are many irregularly scattered princi- ; pal and auxiliary spicules, Fig. 57—O. inornata. a Princi- the former in greater abun- pal styli. b Auxiliary tylostylus. dance. The general appear- ance of the skeleton in this region of the sponge, as seen in longitudinal section, is not unlike that of O. tenuis as seen in a marginal section parallel to the plane of the sponge lamina—the multispicular strands in the present case taking the place of the less closely arranged “linear condensations”’ or ‘‘venations’’ of the latter species. The auxiliary spicules increase in number in the superficial layer, and in some parts of it are very abundant; they lie generally parallel to the surface. Projecting beyond the sur- face at the extremities of the main fibres are tufts of diver- gently-arranged principal spicules—the terminal spicules of 268 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. the fibres; the number of spicules composing such a tuft is, however, frequently greater than that in a cross-section of the fibre. The form and size of the spicules have been given in the diagnosis. Loc.—Coast of South Australia, fifteen miles south of St. Francis Island, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). OPHLITASPONGIA AXINELLOIDES (?), Dendy. (Plate xxxvi., fig. 3, and fig. 58.) 1896. Ophlitaspongia axinelloides, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vill. (n.s.), 1896, p. 309. Sponge erect, lobose, stipitate; the lobes compressed. Oscula covered by a membrane. Surface even, with a minutely reticulate appearance. Main skeleton composed of moderately stout horny fibres forming an irregular to subrectangular reticulation with meshes of greatly vary- ing size, except superficially, where they are uniformly smaller. Main fibres provided with a meagre core of loosely arranged (principal) spicules, some of which are disposed echinatingly; connecting fibres generally with one or a few spicules uniserially arranged. Superficial skeleton consisting of closely arranged, outwardly pro- jecting tufts of principal spicules. Auxiliary spicules (styli) are scattered interstitially in moderate numbers, together with less numerous principal spicules, and are vather abundant in the oscular membranes where they are arranged radiately. Megascleres :—(i.) The principal spicules are normally styli, straight, subconical to slightly fusiform, but an appreciable proportion (say 1 in 20) are secondarily diactinal (oxea); their length ranges from about So to 135 p, whilst theiy maximum diameter (which is rarely attained by individuals longer than 120 }) is 11 p; (it.) auxiliary styli, straight, cylindrical, rapidly tapering to a sharp point, 115 to 200 p in length, and with a maximum diameter of 5 }. A single specimen, in the collection of the Australian Museum, agrees so well, on the whole, with O. axinelloides, as to render it highly probable that its points of difference from the specimen described by Dendy are purely individual ; accordingly I have refrained from bestowing upon it a distinctive name. The specimen (PI. xxxvi., fig. 3), which measures 115mm. in height, is incomplete, representing ap- parently about one-half of the original, and consists of a single SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 2609 much compressed lobe, together with the longitudinally bi- sected stalk. It differs from O. axinelloides as described, chiefly in regard to the situation of the oscula, in the larger size, and lesser abundance in the fibres, of the principal spicules, and in the much greater development of the superficial (‘““dermal’’) skeleton. On casual inspection, oscula appear to be ab- sent; but along the mar- gin and one side of the lobe are to be noticed, here and there, light-coloured rounded spots, 1.5 mm. or less in diameter, which prove to be _ concealed oscula-like openings covered only by a thin membranous diaphragm continuous with the (else- where very thin and scarcely discernible) der- mal membrane. the!) s;oscular mem- branes’’ contain numerous radially disposed horizon- tally-lying auxiliary styli, Fig. 58—O. axinelloides _ a Princi- which are absent from P2! Styli. b Oxeote Ree of other parts of the dermal same. Auxiliary stylus (unlettered). layer. A dermal skeleton proper can,” therefore, hardly be said to be present. There is, however, a superficial skeleton of a special kind, formed of closely situated tufts of principal spicules ; these tufts, to the presence of which is due a minutely reticulate appearance of the surface, are borne upon extremely short fibres, or rather processes, which arise from the superficial transverse fibres. In the description of O. axinelloides the fibres are said to be about 7oy thick and to be pretty abundantly cored by styli about 100 x Sy in size. In the present specimen, the fibres may attain a diameter of 100 y#, and are sparsely cored—the 270 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. spicules being seldom more than, or even as many as, three in a cross-section of the fibre; moreover, the spicules (7.e., the principal spicules) are, as already indicated in the diagnosis, of notably larger size. Similar spicules in moderate number also occur interstitially ; and scattered plentifully among them, as in O. axinelloides, are longer and slenderer (auxiliary) styl of variable size. The range in size of the auxiliary styli can be determined with certainty only by measurement of those which lie in the ‘‘oscula membranes”’ (from which principal spicules are always absent), since the shorter individuals are scarcely, it at all, distinguishable from the slenderer principal styl. Loc.—-Port Phillip (Austr. Mus. Coll.). OPHLITASPONGIA CHALINOIDES, Carter. (Fig. 59-) 1885. Axinella chalinoides, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), XVI OOS pe sgo: 1886. Axinella chalinoides, var. cribrosa, Carter, Op. cit., (5), Xvill., 1886, p. 358. Sponge stipitate, ramose; branches usually somewhat compressed, about g mm. in lesser diameter, multiplying dichotomously or sometimes polytomously, and occa- sionally uniting by anastomosis. Oscula, chiefly in two rows on opposite sides of the branches, usually more or less concealed by an extension across them of the thin dermal membrane. Skeleton composed of well-developed horny fibres (60 p in diameter), forming a _ small- meshed irregular to subrectangular reticulation. Main fibres provided with a meagre core of loosely and some- what plumosely arranged small (principal) styli; connect- ing fibres with one or a few spicules uniserially arranged. The terminal spicules of the main fibres project slightly beyond the extremity of the fibre, but there is no special development of superficial tufts of spicules as in O. axinelloides. Quasi-echinating spicules somewhat scarce. Auxiliary spicules (styli) are scattered interstitially in considerable number, accompanied by a few principal styli; they become more abundant close beneath the surface (here lying parallel with the main fibres), and in the dermal membrane, where they lie horizontally. Megascleres :—(i) Principal styli (rarely oxea) straight, cylindrical throughout the greater part of their length, and gradually tapering to a sharp point, 75 to 110 pt in length, and, in different specimens, from 3 to 5.5 } in maximum diameter ; (ii.) auxiliary styli straight or flexed, cylindrical to within a short distance of the pointed end, 120 to 195 # long, and up to 2.5 ¢ in diameter. SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 271 This species has been written by Dendy! as a possible synonym of O. subhispida—though there is little in the des- criptions of the two that would suggest an identity. However, in the Austra- lian Museum collection of Port Phillip sponges there are five specimens, in external appearance much resembling | a Chalina, which—if allowance be made for certain differences attributable to differences in condition of preservation —agree so well with the description of Axinella chalinoides, var. cribrosa, that I feel no hesitation in identifying them as such. These also agree equally well with the typical A. chalinoides, save that, concerning the latter, auxiliary megascleres have not been mentioned ; b but these spicules might easily be over- looked, and I therefore regard it as extremely probable that A. chalinoides and its so-called variety are the same. melemnansmalainges One of the five specimens, which is dry and dermally denuded, has com- pressed dichotomous’ branches and many marginally-situated shallow crateriform oscula, each of which forms the common orifice of several (usually three or four) excurrent canals opening into its base. In the remaining speci- _ Fig. 59—O. chal- mens, preserved in alcohol, the tnovdes. a Princi- branches are either cylindrical or com- ir bes a a . ~ : iliary stylus. pressed and, owing to rapidly repeated dichotomy, sometimes appear to divide polytomously; and the oscula which are not entirely confined to opposite sides of the branches, are more or less concealed from view by a covering membrane or diaphragm, continuous with the thin though well-defined dermal membrane. The oscula diaphragms may be (ap- parently) entire, or may have a small central circular aperture ; sometimes, owing probably to collapse, they are depressed below the general surface, and are then in a few cases radially wrinkled. Immediately beneath the thin transparent dermal membrane are numerous subdermal spaces or lacunz, which can be seen to lead by rather large circular pores into the in- current canals. To these lacunz and pores is due, probably, a 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 36. 272 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. certain uneven and pitted condition of the surface in the dry specimen mentioned above; but when, as in the other speci- mens, the dermal membrane is intact, the surface is generally free from inequalities. With regard to the oscula in the specimens examined by him, Carter says concerning A. chalinoides, that they are ‘‘often accompanied by a stelliform radiation,’’ due to ‘‘col- lapse of the dermal sarcode over subjacent excretory canals’’ immediately surrounding them; and concerning A. chalinoides, var. cribrosa, that they are ‘‘deeply sunk into the tissue and rendered stelliform by grooves radiating from them to the surface.’’ Although in the case of the present specimens no such appearance is exhibited, the facts concerning them to which I have referred, render it conceivable that this is due merely to difference in condition of preservation. The arrangement of the fibres is very similar to that of O. axinelloides, but the meshes are of more uniform size. Oxeote modifications of the principal megascleres have been observed, but they are rare. The slenderer principal megascleres are scarcely or not at all distinguishable from the shorter auxiliary megascleres. Loc.—Port Phillip, Victoria (Carter; Austr. Mus. Coll.). OPHLITASPONGIA TUBULOSA, sp. nov. (Plate xxxv., fie. 3, and’ fig. Go.) Sponge with the habit and texture of Siphonochalina ; sessile, with short erect tubes arranged in panpipe-like series. Surface even. Skeleton a tolerably regular reti- culation of slender, though tough and dense, horny fibres; the main fibres only, are very sparsely cored with straight stylote and (very rare) oxeote spicules, cylin- drical to within a short distance of the pointed extremity, and attaining to a maximum size of 120 x 4 4. Quasi- echinating spicules of like kind are of occasional occur- vence. Scattered interstitially, though chiefly or entirely confined to membranes stretched between the fibres, are (relatively) moderately abundant megascleres of perhaps two kinds, viz.: (i.) Straight styli (and rare oxea) of similar shape to those of the fibres, but usually much longer, and somewhat slenderer, with a maximum size of 220 x 3.5 w; and (ii.) very slender flexuous styli and oxea attaining a maximum length of about 260 y. Microscleres absent. SPONGES.—-HALLMANN. 273 This species is represented by two dry and washed-out speci- mens. The sponge, which is attached by an encrusting basal disc, consists of a clustered mass of short erect tubes which multiply both by branching and by the upgrowth of new ones from the base. Branching takes place, typically, in such a way as to give rise to an arrangement of the tubes side by side in singie, longer or shorter, series. The component tubes of each such series may fuse with each other laterally so as to form a plate with the tube-orifices in a single row along its upper margin, or they are more or less free from one another except at their bases. Anastomosis occurs freely wherever tubes of the same or different series come into contact. The two specimens are ap- proximately equal in size: the slightly larger is 75 mm. high and 100 mm. by 65 mm. broad. The free terminal portions of the tubes in no case exceed 20 mm. in length, and are 6 to 10 mm. in external, and 3 to 5 mm. in internal, diameter. The pseudoscula are of the same diameter as the otubes anternally.—) ihe itexture: yas shown by washed-out specimens, 1s similar to that of a Chalinine sponge. As \) regards consistency, the sponge is com- pressible and elastic, and fairly tough. The colour varies, even in different por- tions of the same specimen, from brownish- yellow to dark-brown. The skeleton is a wide-meshed reticula- tion of densely horny fibres of a deep brownish-yellow colour, of which only the main fibres contain a slender core of pauci- serially (or sometimes even uniserially) arranged small spicules. The main fibres Fig. 60—O. tubu- may (rarely) attain to 80 » in stoutness, joc” a Principal but are usually less than 60 yp; the dia- styli—the shorter, meter of the connecting fibres varies from intrafibral; the 10 to about 40 wp. The former are dis- longer, interstitial. tinguishable into two categories which pg) UBSUEIS ai might be termed, respectively, primary j and secondary (or excurrent) main fibres, viz.: (i.) those which ramify over the inner surface of the pseudoscular tubes and form, with the aid of connecting fibres, a strong, irregu- larly-meshed, supporting reticulation; and (ii.) those which, arising as branches from the preceding, traverse the tube-wall obliquely upwards and outwards to the exterior surface. The last-mentioned, or secondary main fibres, rarely branch; but, 274 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. towards the outer surface, they are supplemented by the inter- polation of others which arise from their connecting fibres. Their connecting fibres either may be simple, forming direct transverse connections between them—in which case the re- ticulation is more or less rectangular—or, less frequently, may branch and interunite, thus forming between them an interre- ticulation, and rendering the pattern of the skeleton irregular. The fibres are here and there, at very wide intervals, echinated by spicules (similar to those within the fibres) which, as a rule, project but slightly beyond the spongin. The meshes of the reticulation are tympanized by very thin membranes (visible, perhaps, only in washed-out specimens) in which moderately abundant slender spicules lie scattered. There is no indication, in the present condition of the speci- mens, of a dermal membrane or of a dermal skeleton. The main fibres terminate abruptly at the surface with their end- spicules projecting slightly beyond the spongin. Spicules.—Microscleres are absent ; the megascleres are, for the purpose of description, separable into three groups :— (i.) The spicules of the fibres, straight styli, cylindrical to within a short distance of their pointed extremity, ranging in length from 80 to about 120 #, and rarely slightly more than 4 in diameter; occasionally an oxea is found amongst them. Straight or but slightly flexed interstitial spicules, identical in form with the preceding, but mostly much longer, attaining to a length of 220, and not more than 3.5 #4 in diameter. Oxeote modifications of these occur more frequently than amongst the fibral spi- cules but are nevertheless comparatively rare. (ii. 2 (iii.) Variously curved and flexuous, very slender, intersti- tial spicules, about equal in abundance to those of the second group, frequently exhibiting oxeote modi- fications, seldom exceeding 1.5} in diameter, and of very variable length; the longest observed measured 264 pl. The identity in form of the spicules of the first two groups and the complete transition between them in the matter of size, permit of no other conclusion than that they are but partially differentiated derivatives of an originally single spicule-form. I regard them as homologous with the principal megascleres of other species. Whether the spicules of the third group are merely variants of the same, or whether they are represent- ative of auxiliary megascleres, I am unable to decide. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 275 O. tubulosa, regarded as a species of Ophlitaspongia, seems to me rather divergent. In a number of respects it bears analogies with Siphonochalina bispiculata, Dendy,! and is possibly related thereto. Loc.—South-east coast of Australia (‘‘Endeavour’’). GENUS ECHINOCLATHRIA, Carter. External form various; sponge made up of a honey- comb-like mass of anastomosing flattened trabeculae. Skeleton—except, perhaps, when foreign particules are included in excessive abundance—a reticulation of fibres usually well provided with spongin. Megascleres of two kinds, distinguishable into principal and auxiliary; the former are smooth styli, typically occurring in association with the fibres as coring or echinating ¢ spicules ; the latter, which vary in form from tylotornota to amphistrongyla, occur interstitially. Microscleres may be present in the form of palmate isochele. The above, which is an adaptation of the original diagnosis proposed by Ridley and Dendy, is designed so as to secure on the one hand the exclusion from the genus of such species as FE. glabra, R. and D., and on the other the admission into it of the species of Lendenfeld’s genus Aulena.2 The modifica- tion of the definition in these respects introduces no innova- tion, for Thiele’ has already expressed the probably correct opinion (vide p. 288) that E. glabra belongs to his genus Echinochalina, and Dendy,‘ by his inclusion in Echinoclathria of a species of Aulena has tacitly rejected the latter genus. Speaking of Echinoclathria and Aulena in the sense in which they would be understood if maintained as separate genera, it may be said that although each of the species of Aulena departs in several noteworthy respects from those of Echinoclathria, yet they possess in common no single charac- ter of recognised systematic value by which they may be distinguished from the latter, unless it be their habit of includ- ing foreign particles in the skeleton. In other words, the separation of the two genera depends ultimately upon the presence or absence of extraneous skeletal elements. Similarly, 1 Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., vii. (n.s), 1895, p. 246. 2 Lendenfeld—Monograph of the Horny Sponges, 1888, p. 91. 3 Thiele—Kieselschwamme von Ternate, ii., 1903, p. 962. 4 Dendy— Echinoclathria arenifera, Proc. Roy. Soe. Vict., 1896, p. 40. 276 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIO RESULTS. Echinoclathria is ultimately separable from Ophlitaspongia only by virtue of its characteristic honeycomb-like structure ; for although the auxiliary spicules of the former are typically quasi-diactinal, yet in E. carteri, as in the species of Ophlita- spongia, they are stylote. This structural peculiarity of Echinoclathria (and of Aulena) is, however, theoretically of questionable generic value, inasmuch as it is probably nothing more than the extreme specialisation of a not uncommon mode of growth, and is, in fact, actually attained in other genera in the case of Plectispa macropora and certain species of Echinochalina. Consequently, whether the proposal might be to merge Echinoclathria and Aulena in Ophlitaspongia or to keep all three genera distinct, no serious objection could in either case be raised, but the more reasonable course seems to be to regard the series of forms which they embrace as con- stituting two genera, with the line of division falling between Ophlitaspongia and Echinocluthria rather than between Echi- noclathria and Aulena. I might here remark that the peculiar genus Allantophora, Whitelegge,! which its author regarded as intermediate be- tween Ophlitaspongia and Echinoclathria, offers no justifica- tion for its retention amongst the Myxillinze, and perhaps had better be placed, provisionally, with the Mycaline. In its microscleric characters, the genus—which is represented by but a single species—stands unique; but of known forms it perhaps most nearly approaches the equally peculiar Crambe crambe, O. Schmidt.? Apart from a certain amount of similarity in the formation of their fibres, an argument in favour of a relationship between the two lies in the possibility of an homology between the desmoids of Crambe and the microstrongyles of Allantophora. I cannot agree with White- legge that in A. plicata, the so-called echinating spicules are in any way different from those of the fibre-axis. ECHINOCLATHRIA FAVUS (Carter), Ridley and Dendy. (Fig. 61.) 1885. Echinoclathria favus, Carter, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), KVijwtOOS, Pseege- 1887. Echinoclathria favus, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger”’ Monaxonida, 1887,,p..200, pl: xxxi-) les 4 sna. 1 Whitelegge—Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 1907, p. 505. 2 Thiele—Arch. f. Naturg., 1899, p. 87. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 277 Sponge massive or branched, commonly growing upon the shell of a Pecten. The superficial lamelle present their edges to the exterior, forming cells of irregular, often elongate and meandrine, shape; these cells vary in width, in any given specimen, from about 2 to 6 mm. The main fibres are sparsely cored; the connecting fibres are usually aspiculous. Echinating spicules are not wholly confined, as is usually the case in other species, to the external aspect of the superficial connecting fibres. Auxiliary spicules moderately abun- dant. Megascleres:—(i.) Principal styli straight, fusiform, with greatest diameter about the middle of their length—size, 75-105 x 5 p; (ii.) aux- iliary strongyla ranging in length from (rarely less than) 135 to 170 1, and seldom as much as 1.5 y in dia- meter. Microscleres :—Isochele pal- mat@, scarce, of extreme tenuity, 8 to 12.5 jt long. Four specimens of this species were obtained, all of which encrust the shells of living Pectens. They very closely re- semble in external appearance the speci- men shown in Pl. xxxi., fig. 4, of the ‘Challenger’? Report. There is nothing of importance that I can add to Ridley and Dendy’s description except that I have found the auxiliary spicules to be invariably strongyla. Locs.—Bass Strait, off Moncceur Is- land, 38 fm. (‘‘Challenger’’); off Devon- port, Tasmania (‘‘Endeavour’’). ECHINOCLATHRIA RAMOSA, Sp. Fig. 61—Z. favus. a Principai style. b Auxiliary stron- gyle. (Chela not figured.) nov. (Blate*xxx:, fig. 3, and fies 62:) 1go1. Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus. ;iVs,)2; 1901; pp. 89, 1x7; [Not Plectispa macropora, Lendenfeld, Austr. Mus. Cat. Sponges, 1888, p. 226. | [Not Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Austr. Mus. Mem-, iv., 10, 1907, p. 504. | Shrubby substipitate sponges, with short cylindrical or but slightly compressed branches (averaging about 10 mm. in diameter) which multiply dichotomously and 8 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. to NJ usually anastomose freely. The superficial lamella present their edges to the exterior. The superficial ‘‘cell- apertures’’ are polygonal or slightly rounded, averaging about 2 mm. in diameter. Main fibres with a pauci- spicular core; connecting fibres usually vacant. Echin- ating spicules (apparently) confined to the superficial fibres. Auxiliary megascleres rather scarce. Mega- scleres :—(1.) Principal styli, straight, with a sub-basal waist or constriction, usually slightly fusiform, varying in size in different specimens from 70-95 x 5 # to go-120 x & p; (i.) auxiliary strongyla, with a maximum length of between 140 and 160 jt, and a maximum diameter of between 1.2 and 2 #. Miucroscleres :—Isochele palmate, vare (or absent ?). Reasons for regarding this species as distinct from Len- denfeld’s Plectispa macropora are indicated in the remarks on the genus Plectispa. It is a low, generally profusely branched and shrubby sponge with a much. “aUIR AED iated stalk, the base of which often is extended into a disc-like foot; the first-formed branches some- times take origin from the disc, and the sponge may then ap- pear as if provided with several stalks. The basal portion of the sponge, just as are the branches, is formed of reticulat- ing lamella. Branching takes place by dichotomy which, as a rule, is rapidly repeated. The sponge, as growth proceeds, typically assumes the form of a hemispherical cluster of short freely anastomosing branches; occasionally, owing to a re- duction of the tendency towards rapid branching - the branches become more elongated, anastomosis is less frequent and the sponge assumes a more erect and arborescent habit. The largest of a considerable number of specimens measures 150 mm. in height and 200 x 130mm. in transverse dimensions. The longest unbranched branches met with in any specimen, measured 7 mm. in length. (The species recorded as E. macro pora bg Whitelegge in his report on the ‘‘Thetis”’ sponges, in which the branches sometimes attain a length of over 300 mm., and the sponge a height of 500 mm., is E. carteri, R. and D.) The superficial lamelle do not, as a rule, stand quite per- pendicularly to the general surface, but are directed somewhat obliquely forwards, i.e., in the direction of growth of the branches; their outer edges are usually somewhat jagged. The superficial ‘‘cell apertures’? are normally hexagonal, but in some specimens, particularly when the branches are com- pressed, they show a tendency to become elongated in the direction of the branch-axis; they average slightly less than 2 mm., and rarely exceed 2.5 mm., in diameter. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 27 Judging from the rather abundant material at my disposal, it would seem that decrease in the frequency of branching and anastomosis, increase in the length of branches and the as- sumption of a more erect habit, the tendency of branches to become compressed, of cell-apertures to become elongated, and of the external edges of the superficial lamelle to become jagged—are concomitant variations. The sponge is of fibrous texture, and, in the dry state, tough and resilient. Some specimens are of an intense purplish colour owing to the presence of a sym- biotic alga ; “otherwise the colour of the dry sponge varies between yellowish- grey and pale brown. The skeleton is a compact reticulation of slender horny fibres readily distin- guishable into main and connecting. The main fibres, which run (in approxi- mate parallelism) in the direction of growth of the lamella, contain a meagre core of (principal) styli; at the outer a or growing edge of any lamella, their terminal spicules form a slightly pro- jecting tuft. The connecting fibres to some extent interreticulate irregularly between the main fibres and are usually aspiculous. The echinating — styli, which—contrary to the statement of Whitelegge—are in no way different from those within the fibres, appear to be entirely confined to the outer side of Fig. 62—£. ramosa the fibres which lie immediately beneath 2 Principal styles. —b the lateral surfaces of the lamellae. The “"*!#ary strongyle. auxiliary megascleres are strongyla not subtylostvli, as previously stated. In none of the specimens which I have examined have I been able to detect chele. Whitelegge, however, has observed ‘‘in well-preserved specimens’’ a few scattered isochele to} in length. A point worthy of special note is the relatively great varia- bility in the maximum size (95 x 5 to 120 x 8) of the principal megascleres ; and in reference thereto I might mention that, between specimens which showed the opposite extremes in this particular, I have been unable to discern any difference what- ever in external characters Hab.—Coast of New South Wales, in shallow water (Austr. Mus. Coll.). 280 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. ECHINOCLATHRIA ARBOREA, Lendenfeld. (Plate cxix:, “hig.'2, and ip. 103°) 1888. Plectispa arborea, Lendenfeld, Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 226. [Not Clathria (Plectispa) arborea, Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 88. | 1901. Echinoclathria elegans, Whitelegge, Loc. cit., p. 90. [Not Plectispa elegans, Lendenfeld, Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 226. | Sponge stipitate, arborescent, branching dichoto- mously; branches elongated, cylindrical, averaging 7 mm. in diameter, seldom anastomosing. The superficial cell-apertures are not bounded by lamell@ disposed edge- wise to the surface: normally, they are circular or oval in outline, and, on the average, are less than 2 mm. in width and about the same distance apart; but in some specimens the trabecule are rod-shaped, and the structure is then no longer cellular, but clathrate. Main fibres with a paucispicular core; connecting fibres either with uniserially arranged spicules, or vacant. Echinating spicules most abundant upon, but not restricted to, the superficial fibres. Auxiliary megascleres variable in number, sometimes rather scarce. Megascleres (similar in form to those of E. ramosa) :—(i.) Principal styli vary- ing in maximum size in dijferent specimens from 100 x 5.5to 120 x 7 p; (ii.) auxiliary strongyles, maximum size, 135 x 1.3. Chele (apparently) absent. Introductory.—I have already pointed out (p. 204) that the sponge identified by Whitelegge as Plectispa elegans 1s cer- tainly not that species, and have indicated the chief reasons for regarding it as identical with Lendenfeld’s Plectispa arborea. These reasons perhaps require to be more explicitly stated. Concerning Plectispa arborea, Lendf., one can draw the conclusion from what Lendenfeld has written, that the species is possessed of a structure in some way analogous to that which is characteristic of Echinoclathria—and, more par- ticularly, of such species as E. ramosa: for the sponge is described as ‘‘dendritically ramifying ;’’ and in the diagnosis of the genus Plectispa we are told that the sponges belonging thereto are ‘‘elegantly reticulate.’’ The account of its spicu- lation also, lends support to the opinion that the species belongs to Echinoclathria. Consequently, considerable im- portance attaches to the statement that the sponge has—an unusual feature amongst the species of Echinoclathria—a ‘‘clearly-defined stem.’’ As to the precise nature of the reticu- lar structure of P. arborea, the description omits to inform us: the omission, however, affords reason for supposing that the external appearance of the sponge is, at any rate, not altogether SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 281 such as would suggest the term ‘‘honeycomb-like,’’ inasmuch as Lendenfeld expressly uses this term, apparently in a dis- tinctive way, in connection with another of his three species of Plectispa (viz., P. macropora). To sum up, we may say that the evidence is greatly in favour of the supposition that P. arborea is a species of Echinoclathria, peculiar in the posses- sion of a well-defined stem and in the lack (owing probably to the manner of arrangement of the trabecule) of an external appearance resembling that of honeycomb. Since it is precisely in these respects that the specimens of Whitelegge’s Echinoclathria elegans are distinguished from the sponges of the remaining known species of Echino- clathria, it is without hesitation that I here further describe them, with the a addition of figures, under the name of E. arborea, Lendf. Description.—In its skeletal char- acters generally, including the size and form of the spicules, this species shows no points of difference from E. ramosa. Like the latter, also, it is invariably of ramose habit; but the branches are relatively fewer and longer, and the sponge, therefore, is arborescent—not shrub-like. The essential differences . between the two species lie in the aan Ae he a a Principal styles. b character of the stalk and the form and auxiliary strongyle. disposition ot the trabecule. The stalk is peculiar in the fact that it is structurally dif- ferent from the branches—being almost or, sometimes, even quite solid; its condition in certain cases, however, indicates that the non-trabecular structure is secondary. The foot of the stalk usually spreads out into a disc of attachment: in the specimen described by Lendenfeld, this would seem to have been unusually large—‘‘an extensive basal plate, slightly com- pressed, and about 8 mm. thick.”’ The trabecule of the branches are normally more or less lamellar, but are relatively much stouter than in other species. Occasionally, in parts of a specimen, or even throughout an entire specimen, they are cylindrical, rod-shaped; and, ac- cordingly, in such cases, the structural character typical of Echinoclathria is widely departed from. When the trabecule are lamellar, those which are situate at the surface of the sponge are not disposed edgewise to the exterior, as in other species, but are directed tangentially, and form wide 282 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. “‘borders’’ between perfectly rounded (circular or oval) ‘‘cell- apertures :’’ the effect is analogous to that which would be produced in a species (like E. rotunda) with large ‘‘cells’’ separated by vertical lamellez, if the outer edge of the lamella were to expand into a broad horizontal flange, thus concealing the lamellae themselves and reducing the size of the ‘‘cell- apertures.”’ Of the half-dozen specimens in the Australian Museum, the largest (shown in PI. xxix., fig. 2) is that which Whitelegge (loc. cit.) mistakenly supposed to be the type of Plectispa elegans; it measures 230mm. in height, and is thus not so tall as the largest of Lendenfeld’s specimens, which measured 300mm. In the dry state, the sponge varies in colour from brownish-grey to dark brown, and is of compressible and elastic consistency ; there is some peculiarity in the texture of the sponge which produces a ‘‘soft’’ appearance, suggesting that of felt. Whitelegge’s statement that the sponge is ‘rather brittle when dry,”’ is true only of his ‘‘type’’ specimen, mentioned above; the brittleness in this case appears to be due to decay. Both Lendenfeld and Whitelegge have stated that the echinating styli are shorter than those which core the fibres; I fail, however, to find any difference between them. Also I find that the auxiliary megascleres are invariably strongyla—not subtylostyli, as stated by Whitelegge. Locs.-—The species is known only from two closely situated localities, Port Jackson and Tuggerah Beach. ECHINOCLATHRIA ROTUNDA, sp. nov. (Plate xxx., fig. 1, and fig. 64.) Sponge oval or pear-shaped, unbranched, symmetrical. The lamelle throughout are arranged parallely to the lines of growth of the sponge, and at the surface, accord- ingly, are disposed edgewise to the exterior; in the inner region of the sponge they are elongated and so form the partition-walls of radially disposed tubes. External ‘‘cell- apertures’’ hexagonal or (occasionally) elongate, on the average about 4 mm. in width. Skeleton consisting of subparallel multi- or pauci-spicular main fibres joined by interreticulating uni- and a-spicular connecting fibres. Echinating styli plentiful, confined to the outer aspect of the fibres. Scattered auxiliary spicules fairly abundant ; interstitial principal styli scarce. Megascleres: GQ.) Principal styli, straight, with slight sub- basal waist when fully grown, subfusiform in younger stages, size 80 to 125 x 7-5 pW; (ii.) auxiliary amphistrongyla, or occasionally subtylostrongyla, size 120 to 170 x 2 4. Microscleres :— Slender isochele palmate, moderately abundant, g to 12 # long. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 282 This species is represented by two specimens, the larger of which is 1oomm. high, 30 mm. in diameter at the base, and 65mm. in diameter near its upper extremity where it is broadest. The lamellae are thin and somewhat parchment-like, and, in keeping with the sym- metrical shape of the sponge, display a marked uniformity ) of arrangement, being so dis- posed that their planes lie parallel to imaginary lines radiating upward with an outward curvature from the sponge-base to the _ free periphery. The — superficial lamellz enclose between them usually hexagonal ‘‘cells,”’ averaging 4 mm. in diameter ; Pee hs 5 4 occasionally, however, owing to the incompletion (or non- formation) of intervening lamella, several adjoining ‘‘cells’’ may, so to speak, run into one. In the interior of the sponge the lamelle are ¢ relatively long and thus give rise to a tubular structure; in the outer portions of the pe . = apie ees ae ee Fig. 64—L£chinoclathria rotunda, short an rind a more Open 4 Principal styles. b Auxiliary reuculation. strongyles. c Isochela palmata. With regard to skeletal characters, there is nothing of importance which might be added to what has been mentioned in the diagnosis, except that the fibres within the lamellze 1 The regularity of the arrangement of the lamelle in this species enables one to perceive more readily than in the other species herein described, the mode of growth by which the characteristic Ecihnoclathrian structure is attained. The formation of new tissue appears to be con- fined chiefly, if not entirely, to the peripheral region of the sponge, an¢ proceeds in two ways—(i.) by the outward growth, at their outer edge, of the superficial lamelle; and (ii.) by the formation of new lamelle. Growth of the first kind increases not only the external dimensions of the sponge, but also, owing to the convexity of its surface, the size of the superficial “‘cell-apertures.’”’ Outward growth of the edge of any given lamella appears to be limited, or, at least, intermittent; and this cessa- tion of growth of now one, now another. of the superficial lamelle, results in the confluence of adjoining ‘‘cells,’’ and thus is also, indirectly, a cause of cell-enlargement. The formation of new lamellze counteracts this in- crease in size of the ‘“‘cell apertures;’”’ each lamella arises, as a tongue- or strap-shaped process, at or near the outer edge of an older superficial lamella—particularly one forming the longer side of an elongated cell— and, growing across the cell aperture, forms at first a narrow septum, dividing it into two. Thereafter, its further increase of size is effected by outward growth along its exterior edge, i.e., in a direction at right angles to its earliest direction of growth. 284 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. appear, not to form a tri-dimensional reticulation, as in the preceding species, but, in keeping with the thinness of the lamella, to reticulate in a single plane. Loc.—South coast of Australia; exact locality unknown (‘‘Endeavour’’). ECHINOCLATHRIA CARTERI, Ridley and Dendy. (Fig. 65.) 1887. Echinoclathnia cartert, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger”’ Monaxonida, 1887, ps 11625) Pls xxix. ies. 12s aiaae PI exXsci.,, figs. 25, 3a: 1907. Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Austr. Mus. Miem.); 1V.,° 10,0897, p. 504: [Not Echinoclathria macropora, Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus:;iv., 2,(1901, pp.-So, 1175 | Sponge (unless young) ramose, probably astipitate and basally encrusting; branches cylindrical, growing to a considerable length. Lamelle thin; superficial lamelle, as a rule, disposed edgewise to the exterior. Superficial ““cell-apertures’’ rounded or polygonal, 2 to 3 mm. in width. Skeleton a very irregular small-meshed reticula- tion, apparently in one plane (as in E. rotunda), consist- ing of pauci- and wni-spicular (or, rarely, aspicular) spongin-fibres, together with a few multispicular fibres poor in spongin. The outlines of the fibres are indistinct, owing to interstitial membranes, and the pattern of the skeleton much obscured by the abundance of irregularly scattered (principal and auxiliary) spicules. Echinating styli plentiful, almost entirely restricted to the exterior aspect of the fibres. Megascleres:—(i.) Principal styli straight, subconical when fully grown, slightly fusiform in their early stages, 95 to about 150 wu in length, and at the most to y in diameter; (ti.) somewhat tornotely pointed, cylindrical, auxiliary styli or subtylostyli, rang- ing in length from (rarely less than) 120 to 160 yp, and in diameter up to 2.5 . Microscleres :—Isochele palmate, fairly plentiful, 9 to 15 (usually not more than 13) » long. In the Australian Museum are some half-dozen specimens of a sponge which I identify as Echinoclathria carteri. These agree among themselves, but differ slightly in four respects from the original specimens as described. In the latter, the ‘“‘anastomosing trabecule usually present a flat surface to- wards the outside,’’ the maximum size of the principal styli is 132 x 9}, the auxiliary spicules are basally subtylote and the chele attain a length of 15; in the present specimens the superficial trabecule (although often disposed obliquely to the SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 285 surface) present their edges to the exterior, the principal styli (although in some instances rarely exceeding 130 in length) are in no case less than 145 x 9 }! in size, only a very small proportion of the auxiliary styli are basally enlarged, and the chele are never more than 13 # long. These specimens were obtained by the ‘“Thetis’’ Expedition and were recorded an inexplicable error—as_ Echino- clathria macropora (= FE. ramosa, nom. nov.). They differ externally from specimens of the latter species in their relatively few and elongated branches, which in one case reach a length of 400 mm. Owing to incompleteness, none of them affords any clue as to the mode of fixation, whether by means of a stalk or otherwise. A single small specimen (obtained by the ‘‘Endeavour’’) encrust- ing, and growing between, the lower portions of the branches of a_ horny coral, agrees perfectly in skeletal char- acters with the “‘Thetis’’ specimens. It would appear, therefore, that this species, like E. favus, is of variable Fig. 65—£. cartert. habit. a Principal style. b Auxiliary tornostron- Locs.—Neighbourhood of Port Jack- gyle. c¢ Isochela pal- son, 15 to 52 fms. (‘‘Challenger,’’ meta. ‘‘Thetis’’); Shoalhaven Bight, 15 to 45 fms. (‘‘Thetis,’’ ‘‘Endeavour’’); south-east Australia, 120 fms., and Bass Strait, 38 fms. (‘‘Challenger’’). ECHINOCLATHRIA GIGANTEA, Lendenfeld. 1886. Halme gigantea, varr. macropora, intermedia, et micropora, Lendenfeld, Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales, x., 1886, p. 847. 1888. Aulena gigantea, varr. macropora, etc., Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 228. 1889. Aulena gigantea, varr. macropora, etc., Lendenfeld, Monograph of the Horny Sponges, 1889, p. 97, pl. Witietiosa 3.04, 758, 18, 195 pl. ix.) mes) 2-4. igo1. Aulena gigantea, var. micropora, Whitelegge, Rec. AUStoaN erty. 2, TOOL, p. O2..anG pe 1LS: 1907. Aulena gigantea, var. micropora, Whitelegge, Mem. Austr. Mus.,.iv., 10, 1907, p. 504. 286 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. From examination of numerous specimens of this species, brought together from many localities, I find that its sub- division into three varieties, as proposed by Lendenfeld, cannot be maintained. So far as I am able.to judge, the specimens being without exception preserved in a dry state, Lendenfeld’s very full account of the external and skeletal structure, is substantially correct; but it falls short in reference to ‘the great variability display ed, not only in the size of the meshes formed by the reticulating lamella, but also in the degree of dev elopment of the spicules both in point of size and number. Thus, to take first the case of the spicules: (i.) The styli vary in maximum size in different specimens from 70 x 3p to 115 x 7p, their range of length (7.e., the difference between the longest and shortest) i in any given speci- men being about two- fifths of the length of the longest. The greater the size of these spicules, the greater apparently 1s their relative abundance; in some specimens in which they are of least size, their number is extremely small. In shape they are normally very similar to the styli of E. (Aulena) crassa, as depicted by Lendenfeld (op. cit., pl. vill., figs. 20, 21), but as a rule they are not quite So) abruptly pointed as these: always, however, a certain proportion of them approach more or less to the conical form represented by Lendenfeld (loc. cit., pl. viii., fig. 18) as characteristic for the variety intermedia (and presumably, therefore, for the species). In none of the specimens that I have examined have I found a preponderance of conically-shaped spicules, and I therefore regard Lenden- feld’s figures as misleading to the extent that they convey the impression of a difference. between FE. gigantea ‘and E. laxa in the forms of their styli. (ii.) The auxiliary spicules vary in different specimens from 140 to 195 # in maximum length, and from 2 to 4 in maxi- mum diameter. In some specimens they are rather rare; in others comparatively abundant: also, their number relatively to that of the styli varies greatly. They are, in general, stoutest in the case of specimens in which they are most abundant, and vice versa; their stoutness, however, varies, to some extent at least, independently of their length. A peculiar point in connection with these spicules is the fact that whereas in some specimens they are almost exclusively tornostyles, in others they are almost exclusively amphistrongyles; in this respect the species resembles Echinochalina anomala, sp. nov. From Lendenfeld’s description one would suppose the spicule to be invariably a strongyle; but, as a matter of fact, specimens with strongyles appear to be the exception. So far I have met with no specimen in which there was any approach to equality in number of the two forms of the SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 287 spicule ; but, as in Echinochalina reticulata (text-fig. 66), there usually occur in any specimen transitional forms between the tornostyles and strongyles. In the three varieties (macropora, intermedia and micropora) distinguished by Lendenfeld, the greatest width of the meshes enclosed by the reticulating lamella were stated to be 7 mm., 5 mm. and 3 mm. respectively ; but, as mentioned above, there is great variability in this respect, and even in single speci- mens I have found the meshes to vary in width so much as from 4 to 13 mm. Lendenfeld has described in his Monograph two other species of Aulena, A. laxa and A. crassa. The sponges of the former species, regarded by Lendenfeld as embracing two varieties—the types of which, I suppose, are in the British Museum—will possibly prove to be merely growth-forms of FE. gigantea; according to the original descriptions of the species, auxiliary megascleres are absent, but in two Aus- tralian Museum specimens which Lendenfeld has identified as A. laxa, and which presumably are two of those referred to by him under that name in his Catalogue (1888), I find scattered auxiliary strongyla. Aulena crassa, of which I have examined specimens that come from the type-locality (Port Phillip) and agree very well with the description, is quite distinct from E. gigantea and presumably also from FE. arenifera;! its chief distinguishing features are the concealment from external view of its ‘‘cell- apertures’’ by a covering membrane, and its brittleness and friability in the dry state. Its correct name may be accepted for the present as Echinoclathria crassa, Lendenfeld (non Carter) ; but the specific name perhaps should be altered, since the Holopsamma crassa® of Carter, with which Lendenfeld partly identified the species, is evidently more entitled to be identified with and to confer its name upon the sponge now known as Psammopemma crassum. Locs.—The specimens in the Australian Museum Collection were collected from various parts of the New South Wales coast from Jervis Bay on the south to Sandon Bluffs on the north; a number of specimens were obtained by the ‘‘Endea- vour’’ at the last-mentioned locality at a depth of 35-40 fms. Specimens are very commonly found upon the beaches after storms. Lendenfeld records the species also from Port Phillip, Victoria, and from Fremantle, Western Australia. 1 Carter—Ann Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 350; Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p 40. 2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xv., 1884, p. 211. 288 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS ECHINOCHALINA, Thiele (emend). 1903. Echinochalina, Thiele, Kieselschwamme von Ternate, it, 1963. (Pp. GOT: Sponge of various habit; in some cases, like Echino- clathria, consisting of a honeycomb-like reticulation of thin lamella. Skeletona reticulation of horny fibres cored by smooth cylindrical spicules—either monactinal or quasi-diactinal—and echinated by smooth conoidal styli. The former spicules represent the auxiliary, the latter the principal, megascleres of other Myxilline: no other kind of megasclere is present. Microscleres are typically absent. The genus Echinochalina was introduced by Thiele for a species which he regards as identical with Ophlitaspongia australiensis, Ridley. In expressing the opinion that the species should be removed from the genus to which Ridley assigned it, Thiele says, ‘‘eher scheint sie mir sich an Echino- dictyum anzuschliessen, da sie wie diese Gattung Zuge von gleichendigen Nadeln enhalt, von denen ungleichendige abstehen; wahrend aber bei Echinodictyum die gleichendigen Spicula grosse Amphioxe sind, sind es hier schw. ache Amphi- strongyle und die abstehenden Style sind hier glatt, bei Echino- dictyum stachlig.’’? Topsent is also of the opinion that Echino- chalina is related to Echinodictyum, for he says,! “‘I] ne se distingue du genre Echinodictyum qu’en ce que les spicules qui hérissent les fibres sont de styles lisses, les Echinochalina étant, en somme, aux Echinodictyum ce que les Ophlitaspongia sont aux Clathria. > Both writers, however, have disregarded certain very important differences in the spiculation of the two genera, which render it highly improbable that they are in any way closely related: as an example of such a difference it may be mentioned that, whereas in Ec hinodictyum there are typi- caly three kinds of megascleres, there are in Echinochalina only two. Besides Echinochalina australiensis, Thiele includes in his genus Echinoclathria glabra, Ridley and Dendy, and Thalas- sodendron digttata, Lendenfeld ; Whitelegge has since added a fourth species, Echinochalina reticulata, and two others are described in the present paper. Of these E. glabra and E. reticulata are of special interest, since both in their honeycomb- like external structure and in the forms of their spicules they bear so striking a resemblance to species of Echinoclathria that their close relationship to the latter seems indisputable. One can therefore assert with some confidence concerning these two species that they differ from Echinoclathria only in the fact that their fibres are cored, not by principal spicules, re eae Zool. Exp., Notes et imaene 1904, p. xcili. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 289 but by auxiliary; and as the remaining species are very ana- logous to E. glabra and E. reticulata in point of spiculation, it is extremely probable that in their case also, the axial spicules of the fibres are auxiliary. The supposed resemblance between Echinochalina and Echinodictyum is therefore a fictitious one, since in the latter genus it is unquestionably the principal spicules which core the fibres. ECHINOCHALINA RETICULATA, JVhitelegge. (Pit scocs olicmersandpiess OO.) Sponge of rounded massive form, consisting of a honey- comb-like reticulation of very thin, almost membranous, lamelle; the superficial lamelle, as a rule, present their edges to the exterior. Superficial ‘‘cell-apertures’’ averaging about S mm. in diameter. Skeleton (of each lamella) an irregular ‘“‘bi-dimensional’’ reticulation of main and connecting fibres. Main fibres with a sparse core of slender cylindrical (auxiliary) megascleres varying in form from tornotely-pointed subtylostyli to amphistron- gyla; connecting fibres vacant: all the fibres abundantly echinated by principal styli, conical in shape except for a slight sub-basal constriction. Auxiliary megascleres are abundantly scattered between the fibres. Megascleres, sizes of :—(i.) Principal styli, length 120 to 170 p, maxi- mum diameter ro p; (ii.) auxiliary spicules, length 180 to 230 #, maximum diameter 4 jt. Microscleres absent. An examination of the single specimen (the type-specimen, preserved in a dry state) which I have seen of this species, provides nothing of importance that might be added to the original description, except as regards the auxiliary megas- cleres. These—which are cylindrical, more or less basally expanded (i.e., subtylote), monactinal spicules—are usually tornotely pointed ; but in a small proportion of them—between which and the preceding are many individuals of intermediate character—the distal extremity is rounded off like the end of a strongyle. I am unable to support Whitelegge in his statement that these strongylotely-ended spicules, which he erroneously terms tylota, occur chiefly in the dermal layer; rather does it appear to me that they are intermingled with the others promiscuously. In agreement with the thin membranous character of the lamelle, the reticulation of fibres which forms the supporting skeleton of any given lamella extends only in two dimensions or, in other words, all the fibres composing it are parallel to the plane of the lamella. As the original figure does not convey a sufficiently clear idea of the appearance of the sponge, a further figure on a 290 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. y \ WAVY Fig. 66—E£. reticulata. a Principal styles. b Auxiliary spicules. b/ Showing vari- ations of the distal extremity of same. larger scale is included herein; this will the better enable one to per- ceive the difference in aspect be- tween the typical form of the species and that described hereunder which for the present I regard as a variety. Echinochalina reticulata var. (PI. SKI Le Nt) This variety, represented in the collection by five specimens of various irregularly massive form and comparatively large size—the largest specimen measuring 150 mm. in height, 230 mm. in length, and 180 mm. in breadth—is of much more compact structure than the typical variety, and has spicules of smaller size; the lamelle, also, appear to be much less regularly interwoven than in the latter. The meshes enclosed by the reticulating lamelle average 4 mm. in width, which is only about one- half that of the meshes (of) the typical variety. The principal styli range from 80 to 130 # in length, and attain to 8 pw in diameter; the auxiliary spicules are 160 to 200 y in length, and in diameter not more than 3.5 }! Locs.—-South-east coast of Australia; east coast of Flinders Island; off Devonport (‘‘Endeavour’’). ECHINOCHALINA GLABRA, Ridley and Dendy. (Rig. 67-) 1887. Echinoclathria glabra, Ridley and Dendy, ‘‘Challenger’”’ Monaxonida, 1887, p. 163, pl. xxix., figs. 11, 11a; ply sexi. eer 2s #1896. Echinoclathria glabra, Dendy, Proc. Roy. Soc. Wact., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p- 40. [Not Echinochalina glabra, Whitelegge, Austr. Mus. Mem., iv., pt. x, 1907, p- 504. | SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 291 Sponge of rounded massive form, consisting of a honey- comb-like reticulation of thin lamelle@ ; lamell@ interwoven in a somewhat irregular manner, and at the surface in- differently disposed. ‘‘Cell-apertures,’? 3 to 5 mm. in diameter. Skeleton (of each lamella) an irregular ‘‘bi- dimensional’’ reticulation of main and connecting fibres. Main fibres with a sparse core of (auxiliary) subtylostrongyla ; connecting fibres vacant: all the fibres rather plentifully echinated by (principal) styli. Auxiliary megascleres are rather abundantly scattered be- tween the fibres. Megascleres: —(i.) Principal styli, sub-con- ical, slightly fusiform, gen- a a b erally with a well-marked sub- basal constriction, varying in length from about 7o to Tro yt or slightly less, and attaining a maximum diameter of 6 or 7 #; (i7.) auxiliary subtylostrongyla or (occasionally) amphistron- gyla varying in maximum length in different specimens from 200 to 220 yt. Several specimens which I identify as E. glabra, agree in all essential respects with Ridley and Dendy’s description save that the auxiliary megascleres are not tylota, but sub- | tylostrongyla and simple strongyla, the number of the latter being re- J latively very small. In this connec- tion, however, the original descrip- _, Fig. 67—Z. glabra. a Prin- tion is almost undoubtedly wrong, ees ae, peeextlia sy since the spicule, as represented in i. Ridley and Dendy’s figure, shows an enlargement only at one extremity, the other being simply rounded off like that of a strongyle. In the two specimens which I have examined, and in a mounted section! presented to the Australian Museum by Prof. Dendy, the spicules apt: in size; the auxiliary vary in 1 This section is not, as Whitelegge ee cit.) supposed, a portion of the type-specimen, but was cut from a specimen obtained in Port Phillip. 292 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. length from 160 to (rarely) 205 », and attain a maximum dia- meter (rarely) of 4, whilst the principal vary in length from 75 to 110}, and reach a diameter of 7. In the ‘‘Challenger”’ specimen the maximum dimensions of the spicules were 220 X 3.2 and I10 x 6.3 p, respectively. The specimens which Whitelegge, in his report on the sponges of the ‘‘Thetis’’ Expedition, recorded as E. glabra, prove to belong to a new species described below as R. anomala. -Locs.—Oft Moncceur Island, Bass Strait, 38 fms. (‘‘Chal- lenger’’); Port Phillip (Dendy); forty miles west of Kingston, South Australia, 30 fms. (‘‘Endeavour’’). ECHINOCHALINA ANOMALA, Sp. nov. (Fig. 68.) 1907. Echinochalina glabra (err., non Ridley and Dendy), Whitelegge, Mem. Austr. Mus., iv., 10, 1907, p. 507. External form massive, rounded. Sponge (in the dry macerated condition) somewhat of honeycomb-like struc- ture, being formed of very thin membranous lamelle which tympanize the (on an average 3 mm. wide) meshes of an irregular reticulation of stout (up to 250 u in dia- meter) spiculo-spongin fibre; the lamelle are themselves crossed only by a few (interreticulating) fibres of lesser stoutness. All the fibres are provided with a stout com- pact axial strand of (auxiliary) monactinally tapered am- phistrongyla and (or) tornostyles, and are echinated— fairly abundantly in the case of the stouter fibres—by sub- conical (principal) styli, which, as a rule, are disposed more or less perpendicularly to them. Abundant auxiliary spicules are scattered interstitially, together with a few principal spicules. Megascleres, sizes of :—(i.) Principal, 160 to 200 4 in length, 9 to 10 ¢ in maximum diameter ; (ii.) auxiliary, t80 to 240 p in length, and about 5 4 in maximum diameter. Microscleres absent. Having had the opportunity of examining undoubted ex- amples of Echinochalina glabra, I am able to say that the five specimens recorded and briefly described as such by White- SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 293 legge, belong to another and new species, for which, on account of its structural peculiarity, I propose the name anomala. The fact that the species was mistaken for EF. glabra, is sufficient indication of its ex- ternal resemblance to species of Echino- clathria. Its structure, however, differs from that of Echinoclathria (and of Echino- chalina glabra) in two readily noticeable respects: firstly—along the lines of junc- tion of the reticulating lamelle there runs (or, to put it in other words, along each of their joined edges the lamella are bounded by) a very stout strand of spicules thinly ensheathed by spongin ; and, secondly—the lamella themselves, which are of membran- ous thinness, are destitute of any support- ing reticulation of main and connecting fibres such as is found in the lamella of 4 Echinoclathria, but are traversed merely by a very few irregularly interreticulating fibres similar, except in point of stoutness, to those which bound them. Consequently, in the case of dry macerated (and some- what damaged) specimens such as the present are, the sponge appears as a loose irregular reticulation of stout fibres with meshes (which average about 3 mm. in width) tympanized by thin membrane. In their present condition, indeed, the speci- mens might easily pass for washed-out examples of some loosely reticulately- fibred solid (i.e., not trabecular) sponge—- such, for example, as many species of Big 6s Bene: Mycale—with extraordinarily well-de- chalina anomala. a veloped ‘‘interstitial membranes.”’ Principal style. b strongylote aux ili- ary spicules. or Measurement of the spicules in all five specimens gave approximately identical values, the auxiliary spicules attaining a maximum size of 240 x 5 p, and the principal, 200 x 9g p (not 160 x 8 yz as stated by Whitelegge). Vhe auxiliary spicules are not quite cylindrical, but gradu- ally taper from base to apex. At their apical extremity, they 294 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. «< are either tornotely pointed (tornostyles) or strongylotely rounded off (amphistrongyles); and, in this connection, it is rather remarkable that whereas in four of the specimens these spicules are almost exclusively amphistrongyles, in the fifth they are almost exclusively tornostyles. The name ‘‘tylota’’ used by Whitelegge in reference to the auxiliary spicules is quite inapplicable, since in no instance do they show any indi- cation of a terminal enlargement, except occasionally at the basal extremity; the distal extremity of the tornostyles is variously modified in the same way as in FE. reticulata (Fig. 66). All the specimens are attached, as Whitelegge mentions, to the branches of gorgonaceans, hydrocorallines, or bryozoans, and also grow over and around these branches so as to en- close them. ‘The sponge is without definite shape, but always assumes a more or less rounded contour. The largest speci- men, which happens to be of compressed form, measures 110mm. in height, 75mm. in breadth, and 25 mm. in thick- ness. Loc.—Coast of New South Wales, off Wollongong, 55-56 fmsemecLihetis”)); ECHINOCHALINA INTERMEDIA, Whitelegge. (Fig. 69). 1go1. Thalassodendron viminalis (err., non Lendenfeld, 1888), Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 87. 1902. Echinoclathria intermedia, Whitelegge, Op. cit., iv., 5, 1902, p. 214. Sponge sessile, of clathrate structure and erect massive form; composed of reticulating, erect and_ transverse, flattened trabecule of various size, 5 to 30 mm. long, 4 to 20 mm. wide, and 2 to 4 mm. thick. Skeleton an irregular reticulation of fibres which are comparatively poor in spongin and are mostly provided with a stout, often fairly dense, multispicular axial strand of (auxiliary) cylindrical tornostyles and (scarce) amphistrongyles; the connecting fibres sometimes contain few or no spicules. The fibres are echinated, at all angles of inclination, by comparatively few conical smooth (principal) styli, Aux- iliary spicules are scattered interstitially in moderate abundance, together with a few principal spicules. Mega- scleres, sizes of :—(i.) Principal, 80 to 150 p in length, g # in maximum diameter; (ii.) auxiliary, 140 to 185 win length, 4 in maximum diameter. Microscleres absent. SPONGES.—_HALLMANN. 295 The only available example of this species is that which Whitelegge has described. It is an incomplete dry specimen in a very imperfect state of preservation, and, as such, accords fairly well with Whitelegge’s descrip- tion except in regard to spiculation. I am unable, however, to confirm the statement that numerous small oscula are present, and regard the term ‘‘honeycomb-like,’’ used to describe the external structure of the sponge, as misleading, since it tends to call to mind ‘ : the cellular structure characteristic of Echinoclathria. In its present condi- tion the specimen shows no semblance of a dermal membrane, nor of any specialised dermal layer. The original account of the spicular characters, which is quite misleading, must have been based upon some por- tion of the specimen in which there were Fig. 69 — Echino- fibres of another sponge. chalina intermedia. a Principal style. b The locality of the specimen is un- Auxiliary torno- age strongyle. GENUS CLATHRIODENDRON, Lendenfeld. 1888. Clathriodendron, Lendenfeld, Descr. Cat. Sponges Austr. Mus., 1888, p. 215. The three species for the reception of which Lendenfeld founded this genus, led him to propose for it the following definition :—‘‘Desmacidonide with exceedingly large tylo- stylote megasclera scattered in the ground substance. The spongin-fibres of the supporting skeleton contain only a few spicules. Echinating spicules spined styli.’’ In the descrip- tion of the species we learn further that the arrangement of the fibres is reticular, and that microscleres are absent. The character of the spicules suggests that Clathriodendron may be related to Raspailia, and, indeed, in his recently described R. pavadoxa, a somewhat aberrant species of the latter, Hentschel! has found reasonable grounds for supposing the two genera to be identical. It transpires, however, that C. arbuscula (the first-described of the three species, and, there- fore, best entitled to rank as the genotype) whilst exhibiting 1 Hentschel—Die Fauna Stidwest-Australiens, Tetraxonida, ii., 1911, p. 383. 296 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. points of resemblance to certain species of Raspailia, possesses characters sufficiently distinctive to justify the retention of Clathriodendron as an independent genus. As regards the two remaining species, I can offer no positive opinion, since in the existing collection of the Australian Museum no specimen occurs which satisfies the description of either; but, accepting Lendenfeld’s statement that C. irregularis is similar, both in ‘skeleton and spiculations,’’ to C. arbuscula, this one of them we may reckon provisionally as likewise belonging to Clathrio- dendron. As for the other, C. nigra,! there is reason to sus- pect that its description is inaccurate, and that its proper place is in the genus Raspailia. I have examined well-preserved spirit-specimens? of C. arbuscula, and find that the surface of the sponge is perfectly 1 Included amongst the small pieces of British Museum sponges which Prof. Dendy has placed at the disposal of the Australian Museum, is one labelled Clathriodendron nigra, Lendenfeld. It is a small portion of a slender branch, quite black in colour, and in external attributes, accord- ingly harmonises with the species whose name it carries; moreover, its identification as such is understood to be due to Lendenfeld himself. One is quite at a loss, therefore, on finding that its spicular characters are not in accordance with requirements, to decide whether the specimen is wrongly named or the species wrongly described. In the description of C. nigra, the only spicules mentioned are the tylostyli, “.7 mm. long and .017 mm. thick,’’ and the “comparatively very scarce” acanthostyli, ‘.1 mm. long and .01 mm. thick, with very small spines.” In this reputed example of the species, I note, as regards the spicules, the following particulars :—The tylostyli attain a maximum size of 2000 x 25 j1, and the acanthostyli, which are fairly abundant and are provided with moderate- sized spines, have a range in length from 75 to 130 », with a maximum stoutness of 12 yp. Large tylostyli project singly beyond the surface of the sponge and are surrounded at their point of emergence each by a divergent tuft of slightly fusiform styli which vary in length from about 300 to 380 » and attain a maximum stoutness of 9 ; but are seldom of greater size than 345 x 4.5 ji. Finally, slender asymmetrical oxea, 200 to 380 ». in length and at most 4.5 j1 in diameter, are sparsely scattered in the ground substance. Owing to the dry, much-shrunken condition of the fragment, I am unable to determine what was the pattern of the skelton; but it appears to have been reticular and devoid of any well- marked ‘‘axial condensation,’’ resembling in these respects that of Clathriodendron and of Raspailia paradoxa, Hentschel. 2 Although I consider it beyond doubt that these specimens are genuine examples (if not the actual type-specimens) of C. arbuscula. 1 think it only right to mention—inasmuch as I have to remark the incorrectness, in some particulars, of Lendenfeld’s description of the species—that the documentary proof of their identity is not complete. The specimens are labelled (in Lendenfeld’s handwriting) only with the manuscript name, “ Geraospina arbuscula,’ and a reference number; and I find, on consult- ing the key-list of Lendenfeld’s manuscript names (vide Whitelegge, Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 64), that. for this particular name (and num- ber), no synonym is given. I might here mention that the name “ Ceraospina arbuscula”? also occurs under number 307 of the key-list, and in this instance is stated to be a synonym of Echinonema anchoratum var. ramosa, Lendenfeld. This in- formation, however, is wrong, and has led to an error on the part of Whitelegge; for the only specimen in the Australian Museum labelled “Ceraospina arbuscula, No. 307’—that which Whitelegge (Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., ii., 1901, p. 81) has erroneously (and, I must add, not quite correctly) described under the name of Hechinonema anchoratum_ var. ramosa—proves to be, in point of spiculation, skeleton pattern and sur- face conulation, the counterpart of Clathriodendron arbuscula, It differs to some extent from the other specimens of this species, however, in habit and texture, and so may be another species; but since it is of small size and is preserved in a dry state, the probability is that these differences are due merely to differences of age and state of preservation. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 207 glabrous, there being an entire absence of the dermal brushes of spicules so characteristic of Raspailia, and, indeed, an absence of any dermally situated spicules whatsoever. The skeleton is a well-defined, moderately small-meshed, reticula- tion of horny fibres, and is without any trace of an ‘‘axial condensation.’’ The main or longitudinal fibres, which lie rather widely apart, are sparsely cored with long tylostyles, whilst the connecting fibres are without axial spicules; both main and connecting fibres are fairly plentifully echinated by acanthostyles. Tylostyli, exceeding in number those within the fibres, occur also interstitially, disposed in approximate parallelism with the main fibres; and further, there are scat- tered between the fibres, though somewhat rare in their occur- rence, slender asymmetrical oxea (auxiliary spicules) which lie either singly or in contiguous parallel pairs. The tylostyli, which are usually more or less curved, are rarely less than 500 # long, and may reach a length of 1 mm.; the stoutest of them have a diameter of 16 to 20 pw. The largest acantho- styles measure about 110 x 8 yw; and the oxea, which are commonly between 270 and 320 yp in length and rarely more than 4.5 # in diameter, attain a maximum size of 410 x 5.5 #. In external features the specimens are in close accord with the original description. Lendenfeld’s statement, however, that the “‘sponge has the shape of a tree,’’ is rather vague, and perhaps does not convey a correct idea of its habit of growth. The actual appearance of the sponge is exceedingly like that of the specimen which Lendenfeld! has figured as Clathrissa arbuscula, but which, as I have already ventured to assert, does really represent an example of the present species. Having examined a slide of Carter’s Dictyocylindrus cac- ticutis,2 presented to the Australian Museum by Prof. Dendy, I] am in a position to say that this is also a species of Clathrio- dendron, and that it approaches fairly closely both in the size and form of its spicules to C. arbuscula, with which it agrees also in habit of growth and in having a conulose surface. The maximum dimensions of the spicules prove to be as follows :— Tylostyli, 975 x 16 #; acanthostyli, 120 x 10 pW; oxea, 320 x 3 4. The last-mentioned spicules appear to be extremely rare. 1 Lendenfeld—Loce. cit., pl. v., fig. 2. 2 Carter—Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (5), xvi., 1885, p. 354; Dendy—Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict., viii. (n.s.), 1896, p. 48. Vide also, Dendy —Rept. Pearl Oyster Fisheries, Gulf of Manaar, etc., 1905, p. 176. 298 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. I1I.—APPENDIX. Below is given a list of synonyms, as far as I have been able to establish them, of the species of Ectyonine described by Lendenfeld in his ‘‘Catalogue of the Sponges in the Aus- tralian Museum’’ (pp. 214-227), and of the species wrongly identified with (some of) these by Whitelegge. The names are listed in the order in which they appear in the Catalogue, Lendenfeld’s species being indicated by the letter ‘‘L,’’? White- legge’s by the letter ‘“W;”’ along with the synonym of each is a reference to the page herein on which the species is dealt with. Species of which I have seen no specimens are marked by an asterisk. Myxilla.— M. jacksoniana, L. Lissodendoryx jacksoniana, L.! Clathriodendron.— C. arbuscula, L. Clathriodendron arbuscula, L. 295). (p. *C. irregularis, L. ? Clathriodendron irregularis, L. (p. 296). Cynisra,.L. ? Raspailia nigra, L. (p. 296). Clathrissa.— C. arbuscula, L. Clathrissa arbuscula, L. (p. 146). *C. elegans, L. ? Clathrissa elegans, L. (p. 146). C. pumila, L. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. pumila, L. (p. 168). C. pumila, var. rubra, L. CG. inerustans, Carter, var: rubra, L. (p. 170). Echinonema.— *EH. anchoratum, var. ramosa, L. ? Wilsonella ramosa, L. (p. 243). *E. anchoratum, var. ramosa, W. Clathriodendron arbu- scula, L. (p. 296). ? Wilsonella dura, L., non Whitlg. (p. 243). 1 An examination of the type-specimen of Myzxilla jacksoniana has shown that the chele are of the arcuate type, and that the species, therefore, belongs to Lissodendorya. SPONGES.—HALLMANN. 299 FE. anchoratum, var. dura, W. Clathria (?) indurata, sp. nov.2 *E. anchoratum, var. lamellosa, L. ? Wailsonella lamellosa, L. (p. 243). E. anchoratum, var. lamellosa, W. Clathria spicata, sp. nov. (p. 210). E. levis, L. (and W.) Crella incrustans, Carter, var. levis, eo. (pen16a)). E. rubra, L. (and W.) Crella incrustans, Carter, var. levis, L. (p. 164). Clathria.— *C. macropora, L. ? Wilsonella macropora, L. (p. 240). C. macropora, W. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. arenaced, Garter (p. vom): C. pyramida, L. Wilsonella pyramida, L. (p. 240). “Os australise le ? Wilsonella australis, L. (p. 239). C. australis, W. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. arenacea, Carter (p. 16%): Thalassodendron.— ol avotiata, le. ? Echinochalina digitata, L. (p. 288). he typica. LL. ? Wilsonella typica, L. (p. 203) T. typica, W. Echinodictyum elegans, L. (p. 203). T. rubens, var. dura, L. Clathria rubens, L. (p. 219). 1 For the sponge which Whitelegge (Rec. Austr. Mus., iv., 2, 1901, p. 81) mistook for Lendenfeld’s Echinonema achoratum var. dura, I now pro- pose the name Clathria indwrata. Whitelegge’s description is substan- tially correct except in regard to the dimensions of the spicules. His use of the term ‘“honeycomb-like,” in reference to the external conforma- tion of the sponge, however, is inappropriate; and the statement that “the texture is... minutely porous throughout” is correct only so far as it applies to the surface, which is minutely porous over its entire entent. As a matter of fact, the texture (of dry specimens) is particularly dense and compact; and the consistency, in consequence, is unusually firm and hard. The available specimens (three in number) are destitute of any traces of a specialised dermal skeleton; but the information which they afford in this particular is unreliable, since their preservation is imperfect; and it is possible, therefore, that the species may prove to belong to Rhaphidophlus. Indeed, it is to be noted that in certain of its spicular characters, more particularly in regard to its auxiliary mega- scleres, it exhibits points of resemblance to Rhaphidophlus_ typicus; but toxa are absent, and the chele are of only a single kind. Thus, the auxiliary spicules (subtylostyli) are pretty abundant; they exhibit a very considerable range in length; the shortest of them—which are very slender—are curved; and a fair proportion are provided, upon their extreme basal end, with a minute spination; also, the acanthostyles, the spines of which are moderately large, show a tendency towards a reduction of their spination over the sub-basal portion of their length. The principal spicules are without special features, being more or less curved, subconical styli. The dimensions of the megascleres, taking into account their range in length and maximum stoutness, are as follows:—Principal, 120 to 200 x 13 yp; accessory, 55 to 70 x 7.5 71; auxiliary, 95 to 220 x 5.5 »). The greatest length of the chele is 12 7. The “‘ill-defined and hair-like spicules men- tioned in Whitelegge’s description as being present in small number in the ground substance, were no doubt some of the very slenderest of the auxiliary spicules. 300 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. T. rubens, var. dura, W. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, L. (p. 179). T. rubens, var. lamella, L. (and W.) Rhaphidophlus pauci- spinus, (pp. 179, 219). T. paucispinus, L. (and W). Rhaphidophlus paucispinus (p. 179): T. brevispina, L. (and W.) Rh. typicus, Carter, var. brevi- Spins, 12) (ps 292): T. viminalis, L. (and W.) O phlitaspongia subhis pida, Carter, var. viminalis, L. (p. 259). Plectispa.— *Pelegaus, L: ? Echinoclathria elegans, L. (p. 204) P. elegans, W. Echinoclathria arborea, L. (p. 280). Pearbored, ls. Echinoclathria arborea, L. (p. 280). P. arborea, W. Clathria multipes, sp. nov. (p. 211). “Peamacropora, LL. ? IVilsonella macropora (bis.), L. (p: 205) P. macropora, W. Echinoclathria ramosa, sp. nov. (p. 278). Clathriopsamma.— C. lobosa, L. (and W.) Wilsonella australiensis, Carter, (p. 239). C. reticulata, L. Rhaphidophlus reticulatus, L. (p. 177). * r" al 3 il a »d Woy ; LJ im ‘ = i j =. a 1 Z y’ . v ‘ Ps ‘ 7 ' > By, ; . ' ‘ i } ma) . f * a ic. Ll 7 . i j * =)! 3 { i a : : to o>) EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXI- Spirastrella poculoides, sp. nov.; x 7/10. The specimen, which has been longitudinally bi- sected, is viewed from the inner surface. Spirastrella alcyonioides, sp. nov.; X 3/5- Spirastrella montiformis, sp. nov.; x 5/6. The surface markings are traces left by an en- crusting Cornulariid Alcyonarian. X XI. PLATE ‘ENDEAVOUR.”’ RESUETS LOO H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. Fig. bo Ow EXPLANATION OF PLATE OG: Latrunculia conulosa, sp. nov. ; natural size. Paracordyla lignea, gen. et sp. nov.; x 2/3. The specimen, which has been longitudinally bi- sected, is viewed from the inner surface. Polymastia craticia, sp. nov. ; x 3/8. LOOT RE SUMRS: = NDE AW OWIR: 7? PLATE XXII. H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. ie bo (oS) EXPLANATION ‘OB (PLADE TXT Echinodictyum elegans, Lendenfeld; x 1/3. Crella incrustans, Carter, var. digitata, var. nov., encrusting a bivalve; viewed from the side; x 1/2. Crella incrustans, var. arenacea, Carter; x 4/9. Showing the irregularity of form assumed by the shallow-water New South Wales representatives of the species; the dermal encrustation is almost en- tirely denuded ; the surface-grooves are less apparent in the figure than in the specimen itself. ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XXIII. H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIV. A Fig. 1. Crella incrustans, var. perramosa, var. nov. ; X 1/3. PLATE XXIV. “ENDEAVOUR.” RESULTS ZOOM: H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXV. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, Lendenfeld; x 1/2. I Fig. 2. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, Lendenfeld, var. multi- porus, Whitelegge; x 2/7. ZOOL] RESUS, “ENDEAVOUR.” REATE xoxaVe H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVI. Fig. 1. Rhaphidophlus paucispinus, Lendenfeld; x 1/3. ZOOL. RESULES “ENDEAVOUR. ? PLATE XXVI. H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. ” - , 7 ‘ Ty _ Nips vt a “ ei . a / f ‘ 4 % + (a s ’ + ’ ' ‘ t ‘ ® ' : j ' ‘ , 4 a Ve ! bi f * , ‘ 2 “y ‘ = i d - s ” + t EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVII. Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. MOVa ss X99) 56 stellifer, var. BATE XGxavill: AVOUR.”’ SE NDE SWIES ZO Ose H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. as i \ More j re be) hau ii 7 © _— sober wri ss Sout ‘ * ras i ae f i ti ' si “ ‘x - 2 7) ud oA ' , i= tok ' . " ; . se 4 ¥ ~ i ( i oi t es | is ra iv t é 2 es ; 2 pea A re a We to EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXVIII Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. obesus, NOV. 5 x 5/8: Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. geminus, MOV 5 KTH 22 Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. proximus, NOV. 563% H/2. Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. proximus, NOV. 5 X¢E/2: Var. Var- Var- Var. ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.” PLATE XXVIII. H. BARNES, JUNB., Photo. ae Or ~y a See ee) ee Ge, me hs be ee i j peur eae? ; ‘ i : . $ D = b j i - ‘ . J il 2 i . ! . ‘ ‘ : W \ ’ A i z { t D 7 | A iT oes . Ny 7 te y Lely Ga Ser attrias, ee ne = i cei, ae. te ian 7 i“ ah &-ge S Let : eines f ; a 5. Bs, : iad : veut \ P note M + . 4 ; 4 ' : ve : ; > . S , Pa _ z OPP cet. ee . t 7-2 ai i 19 . UY an ‘ : . a eo} &. § , oy » tas, oh ~ oa c : ; f ; Wp ee esa J wh ait PTC ea Tyee, > RUA iy eel eng enn Pe 7 ) : F - ‘ oa i 79 A! : : i * ; ) MP A: |g > 65 ¢ Pt 33 8 a - Ai % EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIX. Rhaphidophlus typicus, Carter, var. anchoratus, Carter; x 3/3: Fig. 1. Echinoclathria arborea, Lendenfeld; x 1/2. LS) Fig. LOOLS (RESULELS JE NDEAV OUR PLATE XXIX. . st ia a = a Sorel as bee Tes > A Ol H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. j Was me coli J < 4 y a” py oath ia er 44) tute e¢ <8 7 oy -s a - ( d ‘ ¢ - 7 ee - i - ~* z ~ - res s e = . . =<) j ( f ‘ a ‘ ar ' fs ‘ 7 j . - e + € ‘ U " ‘ i " , o > i= ¢ iy ‘ 4 ~ Se reas " TPise ees | EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXX. Bigs ‘ ‘ , - ‘ ; S - ’ j a f i \ : 1 * 4 - j a A id 4 i = a ms ; a . ,; : i oe on i en a ry 7 & W Nb EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXIII. Clathria transiens, sp. nov., typical form; x 2/3. Clathria transiens, form (b); x 3/5. Clathria transiens, form (c); x 3/5. Clathria caelata, sp. nov.; x 2/3. XXXII. PLATE “ENDEAVOUR.”’ ZOOL. RESULTS H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. eel ==) = Vo ico) go dQ oq Poles) = EXPLANATION’ OF--PEATE XOXXciy- Ophlitaspongia subhispida, Carter, var. viminalis, Lendenfeld; x 1/2. Clathria transiens, form (d); x 3/4. Wilsonella oxyphila, sp. nov.; ? var.; x 1/2. Wilsonella-curvichela, sp. nov. ; x 5/13. ZOOL RESUELS “ENDEAVOUR? PLATE XXXI\ H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXV. Ophlitaspongia tenuis, Carter; x 3/5. Ophlitaspongia confragosa, sp. nov.; x 2/3. Ophlitaspongia tubulosa, sp. nov. ; x 3/5. ZOOL RESUERS “ENDEAVOUR: PLATE XXXV. ¥ 2 et - H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. xe Fig. Fig. Fig. to EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVI. Ophlitaspongia subhispida, Carter; x 9/10. Ophlitaspongia inornata, sp. nov. ; x 8/9. The specimen is encrusted with a Cornulariid Alcyonarian. Ophlitaspongia axinelloides, Dendy; x 7/9. ZOOL. RESULTS “ENDEAVOUR.”’ PLATE XXXVI. H. BARNES, JUNR., Photo. IV. A new species of Asymmetron from the Great Australian Bight, South Australia. JANET W. RAFF, B.Sc., GOVERNMENT RESEARCH SCHOLAR, Biological Laboratory, Melbourne University. Plate XXXVII. A NEW SPECIES OF ASYMMETRON. ].—INTRODUCTION. The Commonwealth F.1I.S. ‘‘Endeavour,’’ whilst conducting its operations along the southern coast of Australia, secured specimens of the well-known Asymmetron bassanum, and also of another species of the same genus which, on examination, proves to be a new one. The Department of Trade and Cus- toms, to whom the material secured by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ belongs placed these specimens in the hands of Professor W. Baldwin Spencer for identification and description, and at his request I have undertaken the work. Asymmetron bassanum is not uncommonly met with at depths of about twenty fathoms off the Victorian coast in Bass Strait and in Western Port in four fathoms. Specimens were secured by the ‘‘Endeavour’’ on the east side of Flinders Island, to the south of St. Francis Island in the Australian Bight, and also off Shoalhaven on the New South Wales coast. It has not hitherto been met with to the west of Bass Strait. The new species was dredged at a depth of thirty-five fathoms on the south side of St. Francis Island in the Aus- tralian Bight in company with 4. bassanum, from which it, however, is quite distinct. In the following account a des- cription is given of its more important features. 1].—DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIES. ASYMMETRON AUSTRALIS, sp. now. (Plate xxxvu., figs. 1-7.) The average length of twelve specimens is 26 mm.; the average number of myotomes, 55; the average myotome formulat + 38,.9, 13. The rostral fin is slightly raised above the dorsal fin, and is rounded anteriorly. The anterior end of the notochord is inclined a little upwards in the rostral fin (Pl. xxxvii., fig. 1). There are 25-33 oral cirri bearing sense papilla, arranged in a single series and united together by a web. They are disposed at about equal intervals to the right and left of a median ventral one, as shown in PI. xxxvii., figs. 3, 4 and 5. The web is continuous all along, and is highest in the mid- ventral portion, becoming lower anteriorly on each side. In Pl. xxxvii., fig. 6, there is a small basal portion only, in the mid line, but this, I think, must be the result either of injury or arrest of growth, for new tentacles do not develop in between 304 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. other tentacles. As regards this point, Willey! writes :—‘‘It is important to note that the buccal skeleton grows at each end only, and that fresh elements are not for med interstitially. In the adult the median cirri are smaller than the others; and one would at first naturally suppose that these were the youngest, and that this was the point at which fresh cirri would be formed; as a matter of fact, however, the small size of the median ventral cirri of the adult is deceptive, for they are the oldest cirri, and new ones are only added at the free extremities, right and left, of the buccal skeleton.’’ Therefore I think the hoods with the tentacles arranged as in Pl. xxxvii., figs. 6 and 7, are also of the ordinary type, having a median unpaired tentacle. The oval sphincter is situated in a line with the angle of the sixth myotome, and has about fifteen velar tentacles. The ventral fin has chambers and fin rays. I have not been able to determine whether the rays are single or double. The dorsal fin is about one-thirteenth the vertical height of the body, and the fin rays stop behind about the 49th mvotome. The vight metapleur is continuous behind with the median ventral fin, the left stops immediately behind the atriopore. There are two post-atrioporal ceca, the right continuing much further back than the left and reaching almost to the anus. The gonads are arranged ina es series on the right side and vary in number from 17-22. An important point noted is the presence of the gastrula stz age of the egg. In examining the specimens I found several of the ova in this stage, but they are not preserved well enough for a good microscopical examination. The above characters would place the species in the same subdivision of the genus Asymmetron as that in which we pre- viously placed A. bassanum.? In length, number of myotomes and myotome formula, and the number of oral cirri, Asymmetron australis agrees very closely with Heteropleuron hedleyi, found in Torres Strait, and described by Professor W. A. Haswell.5 The rostral fin, however, differs in being raised above the level of the dorsal fin and in being more expanded; the dorsal fin rays extend further back, and ventral fin rays are present. In the descrip- tion of H. hedleyi there is no mention of the post-atrioporal region of the atrial cavity, nor of the oral hood excepting the number of oral cirri. 1 Willey—Quart. Jour. Micro. Sci., xa 1891, p. 914, 2 Morris & Raff—Notes on the Structure of Asymmetron bassanwn—Proc.. Roy. Soc. Vict., xxii. (n.s.), Pt. I., 1909, p. 88 3 Haswell—Rec. Austr. Mus., vii., 1, 1908, p. 33, fig. 1. ASYMMETRON.—RAFF. 305 Enumerating the species previously found in the Austral- asian seas, it will be seen that hitherto only one has been found along the south coast of Australia, viz., 4. bassanum. The following is a list of the Australasian species and their distribu- tion, as set out by Mr. W. M. Tattersall, B.Sc.,1 with the addition of Professor Haswell’s new species :— Branchiostoma belcheri, Gray.— Borneo, Singapore, Torres Strait, Maldive Islands and Ceylon. Asymmetron bassanum, Giunther.— Bass Strait, and as far north as Port Jackson. A. hectori, Benham.— East oe of North Island of New Zealand. A. cultellum, Peters.— Torres Strait, north-east coast of Australia, Thursday Island and Ceylon. A. lucayanum, Andrews.— Bahamas, Louisiade Archipelago, Maldive Islands, Zanzibar and Vorres Strait (Haswell). Heteropleuron hedleyi, Haswell.— Torres Strait. As the species described differs entirely from A. bassanum, the only other species from the southern coast, it may be worth while to here note the difference in general external appearance between the two (PI. xxxvii., fig. 2). Roughly speaking, we can say that in A. bassanum ‘the widest portion of the body is at about its middle third, and from here it tapers gradually towards both ends. In A. australis, however, it appears widest at about the second quarter from its anterior end, and tapers gradually from here towards the posterior end and only very little towards the anterior end. Thus the anterior half of the animal is much wider than the posterior, whereas in 4A. bassanum the anterior and posterior halves are fairly equal. This seems to be a most striking difference between the two species. In addition, the smaller size of this species, and also the absence of the incomplete ring of pigment always found in A. bassanum, may be noted as further differences seen easily with the naked eye. In comparing the oral hoods of the two species, an im- portant difference is seen between them. As was noted above, the most median ventral oral cirrus in A. australis is unpaired. In A. bassanum the arrangement of the mid-ventral portion 1 Tattersall—Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., xvii., p. 293. 206 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. varies very much in the different specimens examined, for here there may be either a median pair of tentacles or a median unpaired one. I have to thank Miss Ethel Summons, Mel- bourne University, for first drawing my attention to the paired arrangement. In Pl. xxxvil, figs. 8 to 15, I have represented the bases of the oral cartilages. in the mid-ventral portion of the hood of eight different specimens, and it will be seen by them that there is a great amount of variation here. Pi xxxvil., figs. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 show no median unpaired ten- tacle, but a distinct median pair, while in Pl. xxxvil., figs. 13, 14, 15 there is a median unpaired one. In Pl. xxxvil., fig. 16, the margin of the oral hood with the cirri cartilages 1s repre- sented, and it will be seen that the basal portions of the cartilages of the median pair are smaller than the others and are inclined at a different angle to the margin of the hood, and so are clearly distinguishable. The two ventral cirri repre- sented in Pl. xxxvii., fig. 12, are not so clearly paired as in the others In referring to the literature on the subject I can find no- thing very definite. In 1895, Miss J. W. Kirkaldy,! giving the characteristic features of the Family Branchiostomide, says:—'‘A preoral muscular hood is developed in front of the mouth, provided along its circular margin with numerous tentacles, supported by a cartilaginoid skeleton; there is one median unpaired tentacle in the median ventral line, and from ten to twenty (according to age and species) on either side.”’ In 1876, Peters? described Epigonichthys cultellum as having ten to twelve pairs of oral cirri, and figuring the under Surface of the anterior end draws the cirri showing clearly that there is no median cirrus, but he does not state definitely the presence of a median ventral pair. Miss Kirkaldy, however, in her paper, describes this species as having forty-one to forty-three oral cirri, thus giving it a median tentacle. Then, again, Mr. J. D. F. Gilchrist® gives the number of oral cirri in Branchiostoma capense as thirty- =Sixiiuiealleneelite as is generally taken to be the case, the cirri are paired on the two pide of the hood (with the exception of the median ven- tral one), i.e., if the number of cirri is the same on the two sides, this would not allow of a median cirrus being present in this species. It is thus evident there is some uncertainty as to the exact arrangement of the cirri and that a structure previously described as characteristic of the Family Branch- iostomide is actually subject to variation within the limits of a single species. 1 i W. anid ouart rou Micro. Sci., xxxvii. (n.s.), 1895, p. 309. 2 Peters—Monat. K. Preuss. Akad., 1870. 3 Gilehrist—Marine Investigation in South Africa, ii., 1904, p. 111. 4 . : ‘ ; A v 1 Br ¥ - ec, “4 f a ; 7 8 A it Mi ' i . ¥ ' ' ' i j as bi 4 F 7 4 . ii t 4 J ~~ ' = i ‘ ' rt . ‘alas , i 4 (A . a] c hi / %, o ; ‘ i ‘ ji i fi | sj ‘ aie, | a hy ae = } bd t i i , & yi ‘ { 1 ne. u 7 : = oS ey : ‘ r ‘ » i ph } a oie 1S i ” ¥ nh @ "es hk - . i h ; ¥ , ; r 4 / BD: i ye iar ‘ ’ fe: bo on Ai. aan -. peer 3.0 a os ‘a EXPLANATION ‘OF PEATE XXXVI: In all figures— AX. CART. ~~ — Axial cartilage B. (CART. = Basal cartilage. Ba ee = Dorsal fin chambers. D.F-.R. = Dorsal fin rays. M.P. CART. = Median paired cartilages. N.C. = Nerve cord. N.T. = Notochord. R.F. = | Rostral fin: Fig. 1.—Anterior end of A. australis showing rostral fin and notochord slightly raised. Drawn with the camera lucida. Fig. 2.—-Outlines of A. bassanum and A. australis to show proportional widths. Drawn with the camera Ineida. )Nat,isizes: Figs. 3, 4 and 5.—Bases of the cartilages of the mid-ventral portion of the oral hood in three different specimens of 4. australis to show median ventral unpaired tentacle. Figs. 6 and 7.—The same in two other specimens with the median ventral unpaired tentacle stunted. Figs. 8 to 12.—Bases of the cartilages of the mid-ventral portion of the oral hood in five different specimens of 4. bassanum to show median paired tentacles. Figs. 13, 14 and 15.—Bases of the cartilages of the mid- ventral portion of the oral hood in three other speci- mens of 4d. bassanum showing median unpaired tentacle. Fig. 16.—Cartilages of oral cirri of 4. bassanum showing position of the median ventral pair. (ENON EU |S) BN UC Ee rd LM eV LOH noes | ENA DOO. OVAL ie } scm $V | By B CART. 4 / SS M. P. CART SQ) J. W. RAFF, del 16 15 =_ r > =: = - : : - ; ht es A. ae ca, | + H er alll b= » aa * t = I . { V. Report on a sample of G/obigertna Ooze trom fathoms, East of T‘asmania. BY F. CHAPMAN, A.LS. PALHONTOLOGIST TO THK NATIONAL MUSEUM, Melbourne. Li22 - i < Me a f : \ Ps a] 4 * j ‘ ) N | ad U ey ‘ * _ i q } ' > ; ] » ‘ ' "i i 3 " : - ap ( ’ _ of ci ve a) ek ’ 5 So! ao! « ~ i TRG Ax) Gy sy 7 a GLOBIGERINA OOZE.—CHAPMAN. 2 V.—REPORT ON SAMPLE OF GLOBIGERINA OOZE. Date, 13th July, 1909. Position, 42:17) S:,, P46.51 (E- Depth, 1122 fathoms (bottom sample). Details.—Globigerina Ooze. Colour, pale green, with a slight greenish tinge. CARBONATE OF LIME. PER- . San ~ : r CENTAGE. FORAMINIFERA, OTHER ORGANISMS, 79 Chiefly Globigeringe and Kchinoid spines, rare; Pulvinuline. Tue Yextu- | Ostracodes, rare (for larids present are chiefly | species see list); Alcyon- hyaline forms. arian spicules, frequent ; (For species see list). | Coccoliths, abundant. | Sse RESIDUE. boucace. | SILICIOUS ORGANISMS. | FINE WASHINGS. | 7 ery a | 21 | Sponge-spicules, abun- | Fine mineral particles, dant; Radiolarians, rare; of a greenish colour. Arenaceous Foraminifera, moderately common, as _ Haplophragmium, Reo- | phax, Technitella. | | NOTE ON THE SAMPLE. This is a fairly typical Globigerina ooze, with a large per- centage of residue insoluble in HCl, owing to the abundance of silicious sponge-remains. This occurrence of sponge- spicules would naturally lead one to conclude that some of the arenaceous foraminifera which form their tests of these silicious needles would be present, and in this we are not disappointed. Both Technitella and Marsipella occur here, and the locality is new for both genera. Technitella legumen was previously recorded off Sydney and near Kerguelen Island. T. raphanus is an exceedingly rare form, having been hitherto obtained from only one locality, viz., off Kandavu, Fiji 210 “ENDEAVOUR” SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. Islands. The nearest locality to that from which the present sounding was taken hitherto recorded for Marsipella cylin- drica, curiously enough, is also Kandavu. The family Milio- lide is represented by the deep-water variety of Biloculina depressa and a few minute forms of Miliolina. Yhe family Textulariida is much in evidence, chiefly represented by the genera Bulimina and Bolivina. Some starved forms of Nodosaria and some typical Uvigerine are the only members of the Lagéenide. Globigerina is well represented and com- petes closely in numbers with Pulvinulina. A few other rota- line genera beside the last-named are found, some of very great interest. The foraminiferal fauna of this sample is fairly rich in species, and contains some apparently new varieties, and will repay an exhaustive research. The Ostracoda are not common, but are, nevertheless, of especial importance. Writhe producta and Cytheropteron abyssorum are both deep-water forms; the latter being a very rare species, and recorded by Dr. Brady from one *‘Chal- lenger’’ station only, viz., No. 161, to the west of Tasmania at 2600 fathoms. Cythere lepralioides is a South Atlantic form occurring here for the first time. List OF FORAMINIFERA IN ABOVE SAMPLE, FROM 1122 FATHOMS. Biloculina depressa, d’Orb., var. murrhyna, Schw. Miliolina tricarinata, d’Orb., sp. Sigmoilina schlumbergeri, A. Silv. Technitella legumen, Norman. a raphanus, Brady. Marsipella cylindrica, Brady. Rhizammina indivisa, Brady. Reophax fusiformis, Will., sp. A dentaliniformis, Brady. Haplophragmium canariense, d’Orb., sp. Gaudryina pupoides, d’Orb. Bulimina inflata, Seg. ee aculeata, d’Orb. Bifarina limbata, Brady, sp. Bolivina textilarioides, Reuss. a beyricht, Reuss. pygmea, Brady. Re obsoleta, Eley. ? Pleurostomella alternans, Schw. Cassidulina murrhyna, Schw., sp. 51, GLOBIGERINA OOZE.—CHAPMAN. Lagena lagenoides, Will., sp. Ah levigata, Reuss, sp. 5 quadricostulata, Reuss. Nodosaria aff. proxima, Silv. Pe mucronota, Neug. sp. Uvigerina aculeata, d’Orb. m3 pygmea, d’Orb. + angulosa, Will. Globigerina bulloides, d’Orb. fs triloba, Reuss. a dubia, Egger. ei rubra, d’Orb. 5 equilateralis, Brady. im inflata, d’Orb. Orbulina universa, d’Orb. Pullenia spheroides, d’Orb., sp. Spheroidina bulloides, d’Orb. Patellina corrugata, Will. Truncatulina ungeriana, d’Orb., sp. 3 culter, Parker & Jones. si lobatula, W. & J., sp. a humiis, Brady. Pulvinulina canariensis, d’Orb., sp. fe crassa, d’Orb., sp. patagomca, d’Orb., sp. * exigua, Brady. - truncatulinoides, d’Orb., sp. Rotalia soldaniu, d’Orb., sp. Nonionina umbilicatula, Mont., sp. pompilioides, F. & M., sp. bo] List OF OSTRACODA. Cythere scabrocuneata, G. S. Brady. i lepralioides, G. S. Brady. Krithe producta, G. S. Brady. Xestoleberis nana, G. S. Brady. ” Cytheropleron abyssorum, G. S. Brady. sp. nov., aff. X. setigera, G. S. Brady. ed = ¢ ~~ o- mel: : \ $i ° ot) 2 F ; ‘ * foe ae 7 phe ; . - Coe i) ‘ " - : ‘ , » int 'oee F * ’ ; * a, rf 7 he —* e®.. ‘ 4 . 7 . ” wes ; it bo Sad ¥ i‘. ‘ae ‘os ws a i Po ae 3 > oe 43 oe ‘ can aes , ~- us * 5 a ¥ ‘ e A oS _ a at ‘ . ua mA + all : J F a @ : ; ’ H + “2 d Y oT a i 7” a va = ‘ U ; ; » : 5 € . ~ . 2 . ‘ 4 4 , * . . r) ry a ° ‘ { r . ‘ = , i ‘ . , ‘a iJ i mst | oN ' a { ~ . ij A | y . rr \ - 5 , | a oe rn ee %y e ’ a a) ee Cd | 7 s : LD *) +5 ea is eer ’ ae PRT CM Ve RM ly fh ; ae if Wiis ib =) a ’ ; 7 ’ . 7% sis -" a int s ho Dein Aas a a : + an : co ial ube ¢ ae pedo Be Ba: iy}? fy ae) i ae hie eS pies oo 2 Bee aie” aun as INDEX. A PAGE ABASASSIS, Sp. . 58 abdominals, Hippocampus 29, 30 abyssorum, CYTHEROPTERON 310, 311 AGANTHIAS megalops 9 ACANTHOCHITES crocodilus 92 acanthodes, CLATHRIA ee wig acanthopleura, EPITONIUM 93 ACARNUS, sp, : 143, 145 tenuis... Je .. 148 tortilis 568 ... 148 ACHELIDERMA, Sp. --- 138, 145 ACROPERNA scapha... soo AGTAEON retusus --- 50g. ED ACTINOBOLUS godeffroy? ..- 98 aculeata, BULIMINA aculeata, UVIGERINA aequilateralis, GLOBIGERINA 311 AmroBaTus australis a ks) affinis, AUSTROBERYX ob 43 affinis, BrERYx “40, 43 affinis, HOPLOPTERYX Fen oe affinis, PEMPHERIS ... . 45 AGBELAS, Sp. --- 139, 146 agrestis, DRILLIA ..- sco alata, CLATHRIA soo BY) alba, Mi1rROMORPHA rare OA! albida, MYODORA .-. ae OL albosutura, HUNATICINA .-- 94 albovittata, TRIPHORA son alcyonioides, SPIRASTRELLA 124, 241 ALLANTOPHORA plicata 276 Gils see nap sca. CAND allporti, CALLANTHIAS —.-- 51 allporti, CALLIOSTOMA — --- 92 allporti, MARGINELLA fb Oe alta, CUSPIDARIA ..- 91 alternans, PEMGROSTOMELLA 310 altilabra, MARGINELLA .-- 94 ALVANIA olivacea ... Peel Oi7 salebrosa OS amabilis, Soe CoeMLOPaIS 151 amabilis, VENBRICARDIA ... 91 PAGE AMBASSIS gymmnocephalus ... 58 ramsayt se Be BU AMPHIASTRELLA, Sp. ... 145 AMPHILECTUS ceratosus 244 Spots an 143, 144 AMPHITHALAMUS eS mus , POS bicolor 106 capricorneus... 106 columnius .-- = 106 costatus .. 93, 104, 106 dubitabilis 106 flamnveus 106 flindersir 106 frauenfeldi 106 frenchiensis ... ye eLOG incidatus ae LOT inclusus = OS jacksont ss 105, 107 kershawt nae eee LO olivaceus ane re LOR pellucidus joo ONS petterdr ace 105, 107 pulvillus aes LO pyramidatus... 98, 107 rubicundus ... bon LOZ salebrosus los scrobiculator... 105, 108 See cod Sao ee Oo subfuscus ... e108 tasmanicus ..- a 108 woodst Zia sos KOs! anale, SCYLLIUM .. ae 3 analis, SoviiownINus a8 3 anchoratum, HCHINONEMA 152, 185, 189 anchoratum, var. dura, EcHINONEMA 299 anchoratum, var. lamellosa, Ecutnonama 210, 299 anchoratum, var. ramosa, ECHINONEMA 298 anchoratus (var.), typtcus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 185, 194, 196 ANCILLA petterdi ... we 1Od 5] 314 “* ENDEAVOUR ’ PAGE anemone, CONUS 112 ANEROCHALINA mirabilis 252 angasi, GAFRARIUM 06S angasi, 'TRIPHORA ... seo, angulata, CITHNA ... fen OO angulifera, CLATHRIA 24.7 angulosa, UVIGBRINA 311 annulata, LiotiaA ... re 92 annilata, Rissoa 106 ANOGRAMMA, sp. ... san unomalu, ECHINOCHALINA 286, 292 anomalus, APOGONOPS OO ANTHEROCHALINA tenwis- pina 261 ANTHIAS extensus ... OS pleurotenia ... coo eABO) pulchellus ... Soe 1540) Sp ees sis OW) antiaustralis, CHLAMYS 91, 96 antiaustralis, PaorEn ae 96 antipodum, CLUPRA sone ali APOGONOPS anomalus ae 55 Si0se) sures ate cos O13) approvina, RIssoa ... 105 approvimus, AMPHITHALA- MUS 25 105 aquila, MyLIoBaTIs ties 15 aquila, RAJA oor ene g ts) arachis, CYLICHNA ... St 95 arborea, CLATHRIA (PLECTISPA) 204, 280 arborea, ECHINOCLATHRIA 280, 3800 arborea, PLECTISPA 208, 280, 300 arboresceus, MyxILLAa 148 arbuscula, CLATHIODENDRON 147, 295, 298 arbuscula, CLATHRISSA 146, 158 297, 298 arbuscula, CRELLA ... 151 ARCA pistachia Sa ae OL arctica, SAXICAVA ... oa 92 arcuata, LEPTOBASIS sn 43 arcuophora, CLATHRIA 211, 228 234, 260, 263 arenacea, CRELLA... 157 arenacea (var.), incrustans, CRELLA OTeeloes 160, 299 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAGE arenacea, PLUMOHALICHON- DRIA re neo 1Ks{0) arenifera, ECHINOCLATHRIA 287 arenosa, PHOLADOMYA Bee gpI arenosum, ECHINODICTYUM 139, 142 ARGENTINA elongata Zag 1 dls} ARGYROTHECA, sp. ... bon, AEE armatus, CHATODON mie 54 armatus, ENOPLOSUS aoe 54 armillata, 'TRIPHORA om 93 ARTEMISINA, sp. : vant, LAO asperrimus, CHLAMYS OO ASYMMETRON australis... 303 bassanum 308, 304. cultellum 305 hectort 305 lucayanum soo | BOB Sd ace a .. BOA atelodes, CYNOSCION OS atelodus, OTOLITHUS Bae 63 ATHERINA dannevigi tee = wot hepsetoides ... son hepsetus, ‘ia soo microstoma ... sel SOS Sipser aco Soo ATHIAS rasor ao 500 = es atkinsoni, CUNA a8 Sil atkinsoni, CYLICHNA Be OF atkinsoni, PYRENE ... ce 20 atkinsoni, SCHISMOPE Man Oe atkinsoni, TURRITELLA ... 93 atun, SCOMBER a 80 atun, THYRSITES ... 80 AULENA crassa 286, 287 gigantea, var. macro- pora 285 lava 287 Sine | Se Ris oan KS AULOPUS purpurissatus ... 22 AULOSPONGUS sp. 145 australiensis, HCHINOCHALINA 288 australiensis, OPHLITA- SPONGIA Stoe ae4sts} australiensis, WILSONELLA 239, 300 australis, AETOBATUS ste 15 australis, CAPROS ... Sab Asif australis, CAPULUS 109 australis, CISTELLA,,. 114 PAGE 160, 197, 239, 299 australis, CLATHRIA australis, COCLORHYNCHUS 38 australis, CYTYUS 86, 87 australis, GALEUS 9 australis, LHPIDOLEPRUS 38 australis, MACRURUS 38 australis, MUR#NICHTHYS 20 australis, MyLIOBATIS 15 australis, PATELLA... 109 australis platet, CALLANTHIAS 51 australis, PLUMOHALICHON- DRIA 160, 165 australis, RAIA 10 australis, RAJA 10 australis, RINGICULA 1138 australis, SCISSURELLA ... 92 australis, TRACHICHTHYS ... 40 australis, VENERICARDIA .... 97 australis, WILSONELLA ... 299 australis, ZnuS ee 82 austrina, LIMHA .... sei, ROL: AUSTROBERYX affinis 43 gerrardi Al lineatus 43 Sis ease : 39 aviaerata, PYRENE ... 95 INDEX. axicostata, MITROMORPHA... 94 AXINELLA chalinoides 270 chalinoides var. cribrosa 270 Sp. 152 symbiotica 237 axinelloides, OPHLITASPONGIA 188, 268, 272 B badia, Rissoa 107 badia, Rissoa (ScROBS) 107 balantium, CLIo 95 barbata, MopIoLARIA 91 barbatus, PHysicuLuUs 38 barbatus, PSEUDOPHYCIS 38 BARLEEIA subfusca... 108 bassanum, ASYMMETRON 3038, 304 bassensis, CLUPEA (Romo- LOBUS) fe. 16 bassensis, SILLAGO ... 60, 61, 62 bassiana, ONOBA 108 bassi, LIMA ... = aioe OL bathentoma, DAPHNELLA ... 94 315 PAGE BATHYARGA perversidens ... 91 BATzELLA, sp. 143, 144. beachportensis, NUCULA 91 beachportensis, PYRENE 95 beddomei, POLINICES 94 beddomei, Rissoa 106 belcheri, BRANCHIOSTOMA B05 BERyYX affinis 40, 43 decadactylus... .. 40 gerrardi 40, 41 lineatus 40 Bie ane ei 1 beyrichi, BOLIVINA ... sao OHIO) bicolor, AMPHITHALAMUS ... 106 bicolor, Rissoa 106 BIFARINnA limbata S50, cs! k0) bilamellatum, ECHINODIC- TYUM 175 bilineata, SERIOLELLA 36 bilineatus, PEPTONEMUS 36 BILoOcuLIna depressa 310 bimaculata, VENERICARDIA 91, 98 biplicata, MARGINELLA 94 bispiculata, SIPHONOCHINA 255, 275 bispinosa, CLATHRIA 211 bispinosus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 177, 215 _bivaricata, TYPHIs... 95 bizonarius, CHILODACTYLUS 64 Boulvina beyrichi ... 310 obsoleta 310 pygmea 310 Semen aes sue 310 textilarioides 310 bostockii, SILLAGO ... 60, 63 bractea, Myrtma 92, 99 brama, NEPTONEMUS 34 brama, SERIOLELLA 34. BRAMICHTHYS, sp. 80 woodwardr ...80, 81 BRANCHIOSTOMA belcheri ... 3805 capense : 306 braziert, CRYPTOPORA 95 brazieri, MyRTmA Save 99 breviceps, MURZNICHTHYS... 20 brevispina, 'THALASSODENDRON 179, 185, 1938, 202, 300 brevispinus (var.), typicus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 185, 193, 300 316 “ENDEAVOUR” PAGE breviusculus, PSEUDOPHYCIS 38 BuuimMina aculeata... soo i) inflata ASG aco HL Vite one soo | GIO) bulimoides, LIMACINA Sete 15) bullata, Lima ae Joa. bulloides, GLOBIGERINA ... 311 bulloides, SPpHHROIDINA ... 311 burrws, SILLAGO ... ae 62 C cacticutis, DicryoCcyLINDRUS 297 celata, CLATHRIA 139, 212, 217 CAESIOPERCA extensa OS lepidoptera ... 50, 54 yasor ... bee one 50 SO dec ‘as OO cespitosa, PLUMOHALICHON- DRIA aan soo 4) CALLANTHIAS allporti eee oll! plater... See ee 51 plater qustralis wat 51 CALLIOSTOMA allportr 500 columnariun sop | legrandi 505 son meyerr 5k soo | retiarwny ... ase 92 callorynchus, CALLORHYN- CHUS sat a 16 calopora, CLAVTHRIA sop HL calva, PHENACOLEPAS soo) calva, PYRENE = OO calyculata, Myrinicarpra... 92 calyptra, CAPULUS . ELLOS CALYPTRAEA calyptraeformis 93 calyptraeformis, CALYPTRAEA 93 calyptra, PATELLA ... soo IO) CAMPAGES furcifera ee let jaffaensis 95, 114 Sees oSc see LAs canariense, HAPLOPHRAGMIUM 310 conariensis, PULVINULINA... 311 cana, TRIPHORA ... sco 83 CANCELLARIA pergradata ... 94 capense, BRANCHIOSTOMA ... 306 capricorneus, AMPHITHALA- MUS nee LOG CAPROS australis... Si CaAPULUS australis ... eee LOS, SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. CAPULUS calyptra daniel devotus Si. Soe CARANX declivis georgianus platessa : CaRpita (ACTINOBOLUS) godeffroyi ... quoyi... racutt raoult rosulenta CaRDIUM pulchellum carponemus, CHILODACTYLUS 66 carponemus, DACTYLOSPARUS 66 CARPONEMUS, sp. carteri, EcHINOCLATHRIA 2 CASSIDULINA muirrhyna cavata, TEREBRATULINA CAVOLINA inflexa trispinosa virgula oes CENTRACION philippi CENTRISCOPS humerosus Sps- ee: CENTRISCUS Foumter osus scolopax : CEPHALOSCYLLIUM isabellan laticeps sabella CERATOPSIS, sp. ceratosus, AMPHILECTUS CERBARIS, sp. CERITHIOPSIS dannevigi geniculosus 132 244. 146 "93, 109 93, 110 cervicornis, RHAPHIDOPHLUS' 177 CESTRACION guleatus CHBTODON armatus CHALINA polychotoma CHALININE sp. : chalinoides, AXINELLA 54 252 221 270 chalinoides, OPHLITASPONGIA 27 CHANDA gymnocephalus 58 ramsayt ; 58 chartacea, CLATHRIA 141, 208, 265 CHEILOBRANCHUS rufus 18 CHEILODACTYLUS gibbosus,.. 64 sp. 65 vittatus CHILOBRANCHUS rufus CHILODACTYLUS bizonarius carponemus ... macropterus ... vizonarius CHIMERA ogilbyi CHIONRE despecta gallinula mesodesma PAGE 65 18 64 66 66 64 15 100 100 ‘92, 100 striatissima ... : 92 CHLAMYS antiaustralis ion 96 asperrimus 96 radiatus 96 CHLOROPHTHALMUS nigripinnis 22 CHONDROPSIS, sp. 173 CHROMIS chromis 56 75 hypsilepis aT 3, 74 immaculatus... 74 CHTHAMALOPTERYX melbournensis ste 63 ciliata, SILLAGO 59, 61, 62 cimex, TURBO 105 cinereus, HEPTANCHUS 2 cinereus, NOTIDANUS 2 cinereus, SQUALUS ... 2 (CINGULA) Rissoa + rineragia 107 cirratus, PRISTIOPHORUS ... 9 curratus, PRISTIS 9 CIRSONELLA weldii ... 92 CISTELLA australis ... 114 SPs) = ack: 114 CITHNA angulata 93 CLATHIODENDRON ay Raoeeuibe 147 clathrata, CLATHRIA 205, 215 clathrata, CLATHRIA (THNACIA) 187 clathrata, MicRocIona 209 clathrata, TENACIA.. peli) clathratum, Ecuinopicryum 144 CLATHRIA acanthodes Madi alata ... 239 angulifera .. 247 arcuophora ... 211, 228 234, 260, 263 australis 160, 197, 239, 299 bispinosa 211 celata 212, 217 callata 139 {NDEX. 317 PAGE calopora ae nog, aul chartacea 141, 208, 265 clathrata 205, 215 coppingeri 215 costifera 215 decumbens 239 diechinata so alll dura i: 239, 242 elegantula 241 favosa son lta) frondosa 237, 263 imperfecta. w. 242 inanchorata ... 206, 215 indica 242 indurata son AY jugosa 177, 187 macropora 16], 165, 240, 299 mollis 141, 207, 243 multipes 300 multipora 178 myxilloides .. 242 partita 223, 254 pellicula 208 prniformis : 241 (PLEcrispa) < ar ner eu 204, 280 pyramida 239, 297 (RHAPHIDOPHLUS) spiculosa ... aon welletel rubens 179, 2038, 218. 224. 299 Sp. 186, 138, 145, 175, 205, 288 spicata 210, 215, 226, 299 striata ‘ sou, wlll (Tenacta) clathrata 187 tenebrata 211 tenuifibra a doo) sell transiens 205, 226, 254 transita fe s.. 209 typica .. 185, 196 208 CLATHRIODENDRON arbuscula 295, 298 irregularis 296, 298 nigra ... 296, 298 Gis. 206 ape 145, 295 CLATHRIOPSAMMA lobosa 239, 300 reticulata 177, 300 sp. 175, 237 ’ 318 “RNDEAVOUR’ PAGE CLATHRISSA arbuscula 146, 151, 152, 158, 297, 298 elegans 5 146, 298 pumila 146, 168, 298 pumila var. rubra 170, 298 sp. 138, 142, 145, 146, 152, 165 Cuio balantium wae as {OD pyramidata... ste PE CLIONA, Sp. ... oe 5650 CLIONOPSIS platei ... soon pelle) Go S06 ide soo clopetaria, PLOCAMIA .. =145 (CLUPANODON) CLUPEA neopil- cChardus ... bat 17 CLUPEA antipodum... soa epi (CLUPANODON) neopil- chardus ... ae 7 (PomMoLoBus) bassen- SUS) -- BAG fe 16 Sajax ... Sse Oe ales} sprattus is gaa KG) coccinea, lOTROCHOTA non les} CoccuLina tasmanica coe, C@LORHYNCHUS australis... 38 mortont Bae ave 38 SOs, — Bae seis Rae 1 collare, PARASCYLLIUM © ... a colonensis, FORCEPIA 142, 143 columnaria, MARGINELLA... 94 columnaria, RISSOA pee OG: columnariwn, CALLIOSTOMA 92 columnarius, AMPHITHAL- AMUS... a 106 columnarius, PHILINE ee (95 comma, CUNA =ee ee 91 commensalis, YORSIA sf. 149 compressa, CONDYLOCARDIA 92 compressa, PEMPHERIS 45, 47 compressa, PSBUDOCLATHRIA 245 concentrica, CUNA ... bem eo) | concentrica, CYRILLA nae 91 CONDYLOCARDIA compressa 92 conectens, WILSONELLA 244, 245 confragosa, OPHLITASPONGIA 255 CONGERMURANA habenata 18 CONGROMURANA longicauda 19 Cona@Rus habenatus Boe 18 conspicillatus, CORYTHROICH- THYS aa cee conulosa, LATRUNCULIA ... 126 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAGE conulosum, STYLOSTICHON... 148 CONUS anemone Sat Bee val} converus fen Bon. LILY superstes ‘ise 94, 111 converus, CONUS... et Lb) coppingeri, CLATHRIA meee iliey CORALLIOPHILA lischkeana 95 coralliophilus, RHAPHI- DOPHLUS ... Seem LINE CorBIS percostata ... 92, 99 Site" ade Ses “a2 99 CORIARIUS semiradiatus ... 92 CORNULUM sp. ae 1 LAS corolla, PUNCTURELLA oO corrugata, PATBLLINA poet eeallal CoRYTHROICHTHYS conspicil- latus atic LAU 27 intestinalis ... ae 26 margaritifer aero) phillipi Wes ccc, waitei ae sean) 24h costatus, AMPHITHALAMUS 93, 104, 106 costifera, CLATHRIA seo Allis cowl, GIBBULA aE eae LOR CRAMBE crambe aoe sq ea crassa, AULENA Lab Stn CAST crassa, ECHINOCLATHRIA ... 287 crassa, HCHINOCLATHRIA (AULENA) ... 286 crassa, HOLOPSAMMA wap PASH crassa, PULVINULINA ero lal CRASSATELLITES probleema 91 producta nee eel crassum, PSAMMOPEMMA ... 287 craticia, POLYMASTIA eae an 4!) cratitius, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 177, 187 crebristriata, NACELLA ... 93 CRELLA arbuscula ... Sean Lua arenacea 157 incrustans 151, 152, 156 incrustans var. arenacea 158, 160, 197, 299 incrustans var. digitata 153, 156, 159 uncrustans var. levis 153, 164, 299 incrustans var. mam- millata ... oeelG2 PAGE incrustans Var. perra- mosa 153, 159 unerustans var. punila 153, 168, 298 incrustans var. rubra 153, 170, 298 levis sos dliasy/ pumila var. rubr cas Keg) sp. 138, 146, 152 cribrosa (var.), chalinoides, AXINELLA.. ; 270 crocodilus, ACANTHOCHITES 92 cruciatus, RAJA 14 cruciatus, UROLOPHUS 14 CRYPTOPORA brazieri 95 cultellum, ASYMMETRON 3805 cultellum, HPIGONICHTHYS... 3806 culter, TRUNCATULINA SIL cumingti, DIVARICELLA 92 cumingii, MBGASELLA 95 CuNA atkinsoni 91 comma 91 concentrica 91 delta 91 hamata 91 obliquissimea ... 91 curvichela, WILSONELLA 238, 247, 251 CUSPIDARIA alta 91 cuvieri, LABRICHTHYS : 76 CYAMIOMACTRA mactroides 92 CYAMON, sp.. ; 145 cyanogenys, LABRIC) HTHYS. 76 cyanogenys, Pseupotasrus 76 CYCLOPECTEN favus... OL cyclostoma, Rissoa.., 106, 108 CYCLOSTREMA denselamin- atum 92 homalon 92 jafiaensis 92 CYLICHNA arachis 95 atkinsoni 95 cylindrica, MARCIPELLA 310 Cymatium kampylum 94, oleariwm G4 CyNoscion atelodus 63 CYPSILURUS speculiger 30 CYRILLA concentrica, 91 CYTHERE lepralioides 311 scabrocuneata 311 319 INDEX. PAGE CYTHEROPTERON abyssorum 310, 311 CyTTuUS austrahs ... ..86, 87 nove-zelandie 85 D DAcTYLOSPARUS carponemus 66 macropterus ... 66 Se, 506 So ee OO danieli, CAPULUS zs 109 Danita telebathia... 92, 102 CUNT ae LO? dannevigi, ADHERIN NA 0 31 dannevigi, CERITHIOPSIS 93, 109 DAPHNELLA bathentoma 94 fenestrata ... 508 94 legrandi S00 WS triseriata 94 decadactylus, BERYx 40 DECAPTERUS, sp. 79 declivis, CARANX 79 declivis, TRACHURUS oo wD decorata, MAVHILDA 93, 110 decrosa, PRONUCULA 91 decumbens, CLATHRIA 239 delecta, RINGICULA... LS delicata, VENERICARDIA 91 deléa, CUNA ... 91 dermiasa. PUNCTURELLA ‘92, 101 DENDORICELLA, Spee 144, 145 denselaminatum, CYcLos- TREMA 92 denselineata, LIoTia 92 denseplicuta, DR1ILLIA 94 dentaliniformis, REOPHAX... 310 DENTALIUM lubricatum ... 95 thetidis Sey JIS} denticulatus, OPTONURUS... 38 depressa, BILOCULINA 310 DESMACIDONIDA, sp. .. 146 DESMACIDON, sp. 143, 144 despecta, CHIONE 100 devotus, CAPULUS 93 DIALa twmnida LOT, DicryocyLINDRUS cacticutis 297 diechinata, CLATHRIA 211 diemenensis, RISSOA 107 digitata, ECHINOCHALINA... 299 digitata (var.), incrustans CRELLA 158, 156, 159 ’ 320 ‘ ENDEAVOUR ” PAGE digitata, 'THALASSODENDRON 202, 288, 299 dilecta, DRILLIA ... nee (OA dilecta, VENERICARDIA Aap 92 DIPLODEMIA, sp. ... ZOO disjuncta, TRIPHORA esl 93 DIVARICELLA cumingii .... 92 diversiancorata, MyxiLua... 144 dobula, SERIOLELLA ee tl DRAGMATYLE, sp. ... 138, 145 DRILLIA agrestis... ay 94 denseplicata ... Ree ee dilecta es Joe O4. dulcis... sais me, OA hectorquia ... ee Ot hedleyi are seo OM jaffaensis —... eee hoa: lacteola Bae oe 94 sawed... ane 5a 94. tricarinata ... tay 94. trophonoides... oz, OA woodsi rer Mer 9A dubia, GLOBIGERINA son lll dubitabilis, AMPHITHALAMUS 106 dubitabilis, Rissoa ... LOG duleis, DRILLIA mils Ee 94 dura var. anchoratiwn, ECHINONEMA ... 299 dura, CLATHRIA 239, 242 dura (var.), rwbens, 'THALAS- SODENDRON 178, 202, 218, 299 dura, WILSONELLA ... seo) As! H ECHINOCHALINA anomala 286, 292 australiensis... Soo sks: digitata SoC sao | SY) glabra 5a8 206, 292 wtermedia 254, 286, 294 reticulata ... 287, 289 sp. 142, 146, 206, 253, 288 ECHINOCLATHRIA arborea 280, 300 GNENAT CTC eer 28 (AULENA) crassa... 286 cartert 276, 278, 284 crassa ae 287 elegans CoO 280, 3800 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAGE fuvus ... i 276, 285 gigantea ace ZOO glabra 275, 288, 290 gracilis 3 Ol laces Soe ee Z8O WUACVOPOra 55 itis 284 ranvosa 204, 252, 277, 280, 285, 300 rotunda 282 subhispida ... ee eo tenwis 261, 264 EcHINODICTYUM arenosum 139, 142 bilamellatum goa hehe clathratum ... tee BSA elegans 171, 299 (KALYKENTERON) elegans 208 ridleyi ia 141, 151 Ss occ 145, 237, 288 spongiosum 142, 151 ECHINONEMA anchoratum 152, 185, 189 anchoratum var. dura 299 anchoratum var. lanel- losa Ses 210, 299 anchoratum var. ramosa aa sa) 6298 flabelliformis Hecre tsts) incrustans ... 154, 155 levis 161, 164, 165, 299 pectiniformis 185, 19-4 pumila ase soe Al(ats) rubra 161, 164, 165, 299 SD eee a0it coo 5) typicun es 185, 188 echinonematissima, WILSON- ELLA ... Sie cae. ete EcTorRIsMA granulata cat 91 Ecryoporyx, sp. 136, 138, 145 EcryoOMYXILLA, sp.... 136, 145 EcryoNninaé, sp. ; sean -9Is) ECTYONOPSIS, sp. ... ony LAG elegans, CLATHRISSA 146, 298 elegans, HCHINOCLATHRIA 280, 800 elegans, EcHinopicryum 171, 299 elegans, HCHINODICTYUM (K ALYKENTERON) 203 elegans, KALYKENTERON ... 171 elegans, PLECTISPA 208, 280, 800 elegantula, CLATHRIA ee eel elevatus, HisviopTERUS ... 67 elevatus, MACRORHAM- PHOSUS Boe ade 23 elevatus, GANCLISTIUS nao LeU elkingtoni, Na'rica ... 94, 110 elongata, ARGENTINA Room ates, elongata, PaMPHERIS sou 47 elongatus, 'VRACHICHTHYS .., 40, E MARGINULA supe rba aii 92 EMMELICHTHYS nitidus ... 66 emphysema, MELONANCHORA 112 ENOPLOSUS arnuttys a a4 ensicula, POROLEDA Sar 91 epallava, TRIPHORA En) 98 ephippiwm, LABRIGHTHYS ... 76 EPIGONICHTHYS culle!lum... 306 HPIGRUS ischnus ... sae 93 HPINEPHELUS septemfuscia- EDS ane onG 49 EprroniumM ac anthopleur a. 93 valida Sue ic 93 erectus, LIMOPSIS ... Bore erectus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS ... 177 ericia, VERTICORDIA 91, 96 ESPERIOPSIS, sp. ... wn 148 EucHELUS tasinanicus Seer OP eucosmos, LiMopsIs... Darren ts} EuLima munita ... oe LELO tasmanica ... 5 LOS EUNATICINA albosutura ... 94 exigua, IANTHINA ... foe 498 exigua, PULVINULINA so) 2 eli Exoce@rus speculiger spo. 0) EXONAUTES speculiger sho oi) extensa, CASIOPERCA oer 538 extensus, ANTHIAS ... Sey a 1 faber, Zeus ... =o: a60 82 farnelli, HistTroprerus at 72 fasciatus, SOLENOGNATHUS 27, 28 favosa, CLATHRIA ... Pa 86 favosus var. typicus, Rua- PHIDOPHLUS 186, 201 favus, CYCLOPECTEN eee ll favus, ECHINOCLATHRIA 276, 285 fenestrata, DAPHNELLA ... 94 ferrugineum, PARASCYLLIUM a filifer, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 177, 187 321 PAGE jilifer var. spinifera, RHA- PHIDOPHLUS son alfsiy/ filosa, Rissoa S00 ... 104 jimbriata, PHILOBRYA noth all FISSURISEPTA, Sp. ... “6, 6 LOI jistulatus, FUSIFER... son. tet flubellata, PHAKELLIA Sone RC flabelliformis, ECHINONEMA = 185 flamia, Rissoa he sso | LOG flammea, Rissoa ... son, KOs: flammea, SABANHA... ee elOG flanuneus, AMPHITHALAMUS 106 flava, VERMICULARIA ae 93 flexuosa, 'THYASIRA... was 92 flindersi, MARGINELLA ... 94 flindersti, AMPHITHALAMUS 106 flindersii, RIssoina... Pe OG FoRCEPIA colonensis 142, 143 Si 608 143, 145, 150 forsteri, SCOMBRESOX idee 180) frauenfeldi, AMPHITHALAMUS 106 fraueifeldi, Rissoa LOG Jreuchiensis, AMPHITH- ALAMUS ... v7, LOG frenchiensis, RIssoa woe LO6 Jroudosa, CLATHRIA 237, 263 fugitiva, LEprorHyRa 92, 102 Julgurata, MARGINELLA 94, 110 fumarium, PUNCTURELLA 92, 100, 101 furcifera, CAMPAGES snot AE FUuSIFER fistulatus ... Soo BY) Spx | kes poo 142, 145 fusiformis, RHOPHAX 506 BIO) G gabrieli, MARGINELLA one Oe GAFRARIUM angasi... S00, | galeatus, CESTRACION 306 3 guleatus, GYROPLEURODUS 3 galerita, PUNCTURELLA ... 101 GALEUS australis... ; 9 gallinago, MacroRHAMPHOSUS 23 gallinula, CHIONE .., Sag 110.0) GASTEROSTEUS punctatus ... 36 gatlifi, MANGELIA ... o. §«=©6 DL GAUDRYINA pupoides poe «33! (0) geminus (var.) typrcus, Rwa- PHIDOPHLUS 185, 191 gemmegens, 'RIPHORA US ’ 322 ‘“HNDEAVOUR’ PAGE geniculosus, CERITHIOPSIS 93,110 georgianus, CARANX ee) Oo gerrardi, AUSTROBERYX ... 41 gerrardi, BERYX ... 40, 41 GERRES melbowrnensis ae ae gertrudis, Rissoina soa gibbosus, CHEILODACTYLUS 64: GIBBULA covi ae soa LOL ocellina ae 92, 101 tiberiana ve LOW (T'rocuus) glyptus ... 102 gigantea, HCHINOCLATHRIA 285 gigantea var. macropora, AULENA ae 285 gigantea var. macropora, HaLME .... sae ASD GILBERTIA senvicincta Boo Oy glabra, Be ese ee 206, 275, 288, 290, 292 glauca, PRIONACE ... aoe i) glaucus, SQUALUS ... nue 9 GLOBIGERINA eguilateralis 311 bulloides a 306 ull dubia... ae soo. . Bll inflata wnt aoe LN ooze ... ie ee OO) rubra... nee Sy oll De: “ae ont 309, 310 triloba ace “er oul glomerosa, ONOBA ... 108 gloria-maris, Monocenrrris 44. GLYCYMERIS pectinoides ... 91 tenwicostatus aoe 5 el GLYPHISODON, sp. ... sone) O15) glyptus, TROCHUS (GIBBULA) 102 godeffroyi, CARDITA (ACTINO- BOLUS)... sen GONIISTIUS vittatus OD ViZzONariUs ... pe 64: GONIOCIDARIS tubaria soe LO) graciliformis, HipPOCAMPUS 29 gracilis, HCHINOCLATHRIA 257 | gracilis, SILLAGO,.. 60, 62 grandis, LovELLA ... ee 38 granvfera, TRIPHORA : granulata, EororisMA =... 91 gravida, PLUMOHALICHON- DRIA 3 soo JUGS) . GRAYELLA, sp. 500 . 142 guithert, Microrynoren.a 143 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAG gymnocephalus, AMBASSIS... 58 gymnocephalus, CHANDA ... 58 gynnotus, MuRNICHTHYS 20 GYROPLEURODUS galeatus ... 3 H habenata, CONGERMURA[NA 18 habenatus, CONGRUS ae 18 HAtMe gigantea var. macropora eEZSO hamata, CuNA ae aie 91 HAMIGERA, sp. Ke ee 145 HAPLOPHRAGMIUM canariense 3810 sp. ue si saa, - @h0)9) hardwickii, SoLEGNATHUS... 28 harrissoni, PUNCTURELLA... 101 hectorguia, DRILLIA ose, QA hectori, ASYMMBTRON sto GA0}5) hedleyi, Drinuta... Bee) oe hedleyi, HerTHROPLEURON ... 304 hedleyt, SOLHTELLINA aoe or HeLcIoNntiscus illabratus ... 98 HELiasres hypsilepsis base, aif) immaculatus... sce on HEMIPLEUROTOMA mayi ... 95 hemipsila, PUNCTURELLA ... 101 HeEMIscyLiium variolatum U hepsetoides, ATHHRINA ane 32 hepsetus, ATHERINA Ae HE&PTANCHUS cinereus oe 2 indicus ae ae 2 HEPTRANCHIAS indicus... 2 perlo ... bos wad 2 HETEROCLATHRIA, sp. 141, 145 HTrERODON’US philippi ... 2 HETEROPLEURON hedleyi ... 304 hilwm, MANGILIA ... soee OA Hippocampus abdominalis 29,30 graciliformis pop) Hipponyx, sp. : Te LO9 HistioprEervs elevatus ... 67 farnelli os sen = oH labiosus ane ee te recurvirostris Seamed HISTODERMA, sp. ... OAS HistODERMELLA, sp. 142, 148, 145 HOLOPSAMMA crassa SG. ZASih HO.Loress sevlineatus OO HoLoTHURIA, sp. ... iss eel homaton, CYCLOSTREMA .,. 92 PAGE Hom@opicrya, sp.... 144. HopLopreryx «ffinis 43 lewesiensis 40 SVs 0c 400 40 Hopbosretuus mediterraneus 40 sp. ae ae 40 hulliana, RiIssoa 93, 108 humerosus, CANTRISCUS 24 hunvilis, TRUNCATULINA ... 311 HYMENANCORA, sp. 137, 138, 145, 147 HyMERAPHIA, sp. 1387, 138, 145, 208 HYMERHABDIA, Sp. ... .. 146 HyMeErrocHora, sp. 136, 187, 145 HYPOPLECTRODES senicincta 50 hypsilepis, CHROMIS 73, 74 hypsilepis, H®LIASTES goo. hs Hypsipors microlepis 75 Hypsypors microlepis 75 sp. 75 I IANTHINA exviqgua a eS illabratus, HELCIONISCUS ... 92 imbrex, RISSOA 103 IMBRICARIA porphyria 95 immaculatus, CHROMIS 74. immaculatus, HELIAS'TES 74: unvperfecta, CLATHRIA .. 242 inanchorata, CLATHRIA 206, 215 incerta, LIoTA 92 incidata, SABAN@MA... 107 incidatus, AMPHITHALAMUS 107 inclusus, AMPHI'THALAMUS 105 incompleta, RISSOA ... 93 incrustans Var. arenacea, CRELLA 158, 160, 197, 299 incrustans, CRELLA 151, 152, 156 incrustans var. digitata, CRELLA 1538, 156, 159 incrustans var. levis, CRELLA 153, 164, 299 incrustans var. maminilata, CRELLA 162 tnerustans Var. perraiiosa, CRELLA 153, 159 incrustans, PLUMOHALICHON- DRIA ste LO INDEX. 323 PAGE incrustans var. pumila, CRELLA 1538, 168, 298 licrustans var. rubra, CRELLA 153, 170, 298 tidica, CLATHRIA 242 undicus, HEPTANCHUS 5G 2 indicus, HBPTRANCHIAS ... 2 indiscreta, MARGINELLA 94 indivisa, RHIZAMMINA 310 indurata, CLATHRIA 299 inflata, BULIMINA 310 inflata, GLOBIGERINA 311 inflata, Limacina 95 inflera, CAVOLINA 5 33) mmfrequens, PARAMYXILLA... 141 inornata, OPHLITASPONGIA 264, 265 insignis, RIGHARDSONIA 72 integra, 'TURQUETIA 92 intermedia, ECHINOCHALINA 254, 294 intermedia, ECHINOCLATHRIA 286, 294 intermedius, TRACHICHTHYS 40 intestinalis, CORY THROICH- THYS eae awe 0 intestinalis, SYNGNATHUS... 26 IoPHON, sp. ... 136, 145 LorROCHOTA coccinea oe was sp. 136, 142, 144, 145 irregularis, CLATHRIODEN- DRON 296, 298 isabella, CBPHALOSCYLLIUM 6 isabella, SQUALUS ... aes 6 ischnus, HPIGRUS 93 ISOSILLAGO maculata 60 punctata sca 9) sp. 59, 60 J jucksoni, AMPHITHALAMUS 105, 107 jacksonvana, LISSODENDORYX 298 jucksoniana, MyXILLA 298 jacksoniensis, MACTRA 92 juffuensis, CAMPAGES 95, 114. juffaensis, CYCLOSTREMA 92 jufiaensis, DRILLIA... . 94 jujfaensis, MAGASBELLA goo flute! jafiaensis, PYRENE ... 500 324 ‘6 BNDEAVOUR ”” PAGE japonicus, SCOMBER 80 jogosa, CLATHRIA Wil Wsitf jowbini, MAGELLANIA 114: K (KALYKENTERON) ECHINODIC- TYUM eleguns 208 elegans 171 silex Nzalt sp. hee 173 kampylum, CYMATIUM G4. kershawi, AMPHITHALAMUS ~~ 107 kershawi, RISSOINA... 107 kesteveni, PUNCTURELLA 101 kingensis, MANGILIA 94 klunzingeri, PEMPHERIS 47 KRiTHE producta 310, 311 KRAUSSINA tasmanica 95 L labiosa, MAccULLOCHIA 2 labiosus, HisTriopTERUS 72 LABRICHTHYS cwviert 67 cyanogenys ... Sfapie (lO ephippiun ... oe aio) mortont au Poe eee psittacula ... aod rubicunda ... pate ai vestita eae WG LABRUS psittaculus... Boo ee hall (LauroGa) psittucula 77 lacteola, DRILLIA 94, levigata, LAGENA 311 levis, HCHINONEMA... 165 Laagena levigata 311 lagenoides . dil quadricostuluta 311 lagenoides, LAGENA... : 311 lamella (var.) rubens, THALAS- SODENDRON 178, 218, lamellosa (var.) anchoratum, ECHINONEMA 210, 289 lamellosa (var.) rubens, THA- LASSODENDRON 178 lamellosa, WILSONELLA 299 laticeps, CEPHALOSCYLLIUM 6 laticeps, SCYLLIUM... 6 LATRUNCULIA conulosa 126 lava, AULENA : Ce ol lawa, ECHINOCLATHRIA ... 286 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. | PAGE | Leva meliacea : 91 legrandi, CALLIOSTOMA 92 legrandi, DAPHNELLA ae 94. legqumen, TECHNITELLA 309, 310 | LEPIDOLEPRUS australis 38 | lepidoptera, CHSIOPERCA 50, 54 | lepralioides, CyTHERE 310, 311 LEPTOBASIS arcuatau sce 1415} Spiene . 148, 145 LEPTOSIA, sp. 137, 188, 145 | Leproruyra fugitiva 92, 102 | rosea ... 92 levis, CRELLA = 157 levis, ECHINONEMA... 161, 164, 165, 299 | levis (var.) incrustans, CRELLA 153, 164, 299 lewesiensis, HoPLOPTERYX ... 40 lewini, SPHYRNA 9 lewini, ZYGHNA 9 | lignea, PARACORDYLA 132 | Laima bassi .. 91 bullata 91 LIMACINA bulimoides 95 inflata Gd LIMA austrina 91 murrayr SL parvula 91 LIMOPSIS erectus 91 ewcosmos 91 tenisoni 9] linea, Mopiona 91 lineatus, AUSTROBERYX 43 lineatus, BERYX 40 lineatus, PEMPHERIS 45 Liora annulata 92 denselineata 92 incerta na 92 lischkeana, CORALLIOPHILA 95 LIsSODENDORYX jacksoniana 298 sp. 136, 138, 145 stipitata 244 liturata, MARGINELLA itl lobatula, ''RUNCATULINA ... 311 lobosa, CLATHRIOPSAMMA 239, 300 lockyeri, Rissoa 93, 103 loddere, MARGINELLA . 94 longicauda, CONGROMURHNA 19 Loves grandis eS lubricatum, DENTALIUM ... 95 INDEX. 325 PAGE PAGE LuCAPINELLA nigrita ae 92 | marguritacea, TRIGONIA ... 91 lucayanum, ASYMMETRON... 305 | margaritifer, CORYVHROICH- THYS ce jos 48) M MARGINELLA allporti ... 94 | altilabra Mais a 94. Maccunnocutia labiosa 25) biplicata Bi ie od San yas aoe sae UE | columnaria ... sas OA macleayi, TRACHICHTHYS ... 44 flinderst ee : 94. macrolepis, PEMPHERIS ... 45 fulgurata ... 94, 110 macropora, CLATHRIA 161, 165 | gabrieli oe ae OA 240,259 | indiscreta ... Re 94. macropora, HCHINOCLATHRIA liturata She ee Lt 277, 284 loddere 16 ae 94. muacropora, ECHINOCLATHRIA microscopica ... ay) a OA (PLECTISPA ) soo AQHA | multiplicata ... son eel macropora (var.) gigantea, ovulum oe on Om AULENA ... soo ise | pulchella oe Sey ua macropora (var.) gigantea, | sagittata ae roe elit: HALME ... ace Ash) | stanislaus ... soa) EE macropora, PLECTISPA 242,276 | SHULL Once ae soo ed Dili. sm, BOO) | vercor. wee (OA: macropora, WILSONELLA marmorata, NeosiLago =s- 60 299, 800 MARMORATUS, sp. ... oe 6 macropterus, CHILODACTYLUS 66 MARSIPELLA ee le =e oO macropterus, DACTYLOSPARUS 66 Ss. ade 0 soa 018) macropterus, MURHENICHTHYS 21 MatvrHinpa econ oH IK) MACRORHAMPHOSUS elevalus 23 mayi, HEMIPLEUROTOMA ... 95 gallinago —... Soe eer 433 mayt, MYRTBA ae goo scolopax a son mayi, ODOSTOMIA ... oe sp. poe ace 1 mediolevis, TURRITELLA ... 93 Macrurus austr Abe. ae 38 mediterraneus, HOPLOSTE- Mactra jacksoniensis ; 92 THUS Sd eA) mactroides, Cyamiomacrra 92 megalops, ACANTHIUS sac 9 maculata, ISOSULLAGO soo (XG) megalops, SQUALUS.. 5 9 maculata, SILLAGO .. 59, 61 MEGATEBENNUS conc Ciena 92 maculatum, SCYLLIUM vse 3 melbournensis, CHTHAMALOP- Macunsocuia labiosa sae ie TERYX ae ee eeiGs Sp oe see oo 72 melbournensis, GERRES ... 68 MADREPORA, sp. -» 212 MELONANCHORA emphysema 142 MAGASELLA jiffwensis Boe = A Spirent Sta 4s Sp. + : . 114 membranacea, OPHLITAS- MAGELLANIA joubini saan PONGIA ... 215, 253 mamamillata (var.) inerustais, meridionalis, RinaicuLa 95, 112 _ CRELLA ... ee lG2 MnEsApos, sp. oA Lesine mamiillata, PLUMOHALI- ; S = ane 92. 100 coon 155 mesodesma, CEOS Ki 92, 106 MANGELIA gatliffi ae er 94 mesodesmut, VENUS ... cols 100 hulwint seamen. 94 meyeri, CALLIOSTOMA =... 92 kingensis pe ee OA. nricra, SYRNOLA sts a BOS spica ... ae 94 Microcionajelathrata Seen AOS) maorianus, PLEURODON 91, 96 scubidu 142, 150, 151 ” 326 ‘¢ ENDEAVOUR PAGE MICROCIONA, sp. 138, 145, 208 (Microctona) STYLOTEL- LOPSIS scabida 151 microcionides, PLUMOHALI- CHONDRIA 146 microlepis, HypSyPOPs 75 microscopica, MARGINELLA 94. microstoma, ATHERINA 32 microstoma, THNIOMEMBRAS — 32 MicroryLoreLLa giintheri 148 Snort 142, 145 miliacea, LEDA 91 MILIOLINA, sp, 310 tricarinata aon @xK0) mirabilis, ANEROCHALINA... 2052 Mirra retrocurvata 95 scalariformis a 95 stadialis 95, 112 tasmanica 952, Mirromorpnua alba 94, avicostata... ae 94. pallidula 95 paucilirata 95 paula... 95 solida... 95 MoptIo0.a linea 91 Mopt10.uaria barbata Sep Ow mollis, CLATHRIA 141, 207, 243 Moni.Lea oleacea 92, 161 philippensis ... a MOonocentRIS glorta-maris 44. montiformis, SPIRASTELLA 119 mortoni, C@LORHYNCHUS ... 38 mortoni, LABRICHTHYS aa moseleyi, SCOLOPES... 132 mucronota, NODOSARIA Sl miilleri, PEMPHERIS 47 multipes, CLATHRIA 300 multipes, PLECTISPA .. 204 multiplieata, MARGINELLA 94 multipora, CLATHRIA 178 multipora (var.) pawcipinus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 178, 184 multiradiata, PEMPHERIS 45, 47 multiradiatus, PEMPHERIS 45 munitau, HULIMA 110 MuR2NICHTHYS australis... 20 breviceps... 20 gymnotus, ... 20 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAGE macropterus ... 21 tusmaniensis 19 murrayt, Lima 91 nurrhyna, CASSIDULINA 310 My iopatis aquila 15 australis 15 niewhofi 15 niewhofir 15 Son ese 15 Myopora albida xo Myrrma bractea 92, 99 brazieri 99 may ue 99 MyTInicaRDIA ealyc alate 500 MyxXI“ua arborescens 148 diversiancorata 144 jacksoniana 298 pedunculata .. 144 sp. 136, 138, 145, 221 mywilloides, CLATHRIA 242 N Nace na crebristriata 93 nana, XESTOLEBERIS 3lt NARCINE tasmaniensis a 14 Navrica elkingtoni 94, 110 sticta... See 94 nebulosa, ZENOPSIS ... 83 nebulosus, ZEUS 83 neopilchardus, CLUPEA (CLUPANODON) 17/ NEOSILLAGO marmorata 60 NEProngemMuSs bilineatus 36 brama 34 trevale ; Pray: neptunt, PLUMOHALICHON- DRIA 146 nidificata, OPHEITASPONGIA. 254 niewhofi, MYLIOBATIS 15 niewhofi, RAJA 15 niewhofii, MYLIOBATIS 15 nigra, CLATHRIODENDRON aes 298 nigra, RASPAILIA 298 nigripinnis, CHLOROPHTHAL- MUS 22 nigrita, LUCAPINELLA 92 nitida, RAJA... 10 nitida, RINGICULA 113 nitidus, HMMELICHTHYS 66 INDEX. 327 PAGE | PAGE Noposaria mucronota 311 | oscitans, PHILINE ... won eh) proxima 311 | OsrRacoDa, sp. 311 Sp. . 310) | OvToLITHUS atelodus Lae 63 nodosa, VERMICULARIA 93 ovulum, MARGINELLA Be 94. (Nopuxvs) Rissoa pellucida 107 ovyphila, WILSONELLA = 244, 249 NONIONINA pompilioides 311 | P umbilicatula... 311 | NovipaNwus cinereus 2 | pallidula, MrivRoMorRPHa... 95 NOTOTHENIIDA, sp. 60 palmatus, PHysicuLus ... 38 nove-zelandiec, CyTTUS 85 papilla, OPHLITASPONGIA ... 254 nove-zelandie, ZBUS 85 | papillosa, SPIRASTRELLA 126 novapostrema, TRIPHORA 93 papyracea, PHAKELLIA 261 Nucuta beachportensis 91 PARACORDYLA lignea 25 BY obliqua 91 Sp. ane cee 1315 132 nudipinnis, PristiopHorus 10 paradova, RASPAILIA 295 PARAMYXILLA infrequens 141 O jie eae ae LAD PARASCYLLIUM collare ste if obesus (var.) typicus, Rua- | ferrugineum ... he 7 PHIDOPHLUS 196 | variolatum ... ‘S 7 obliqua, NUCULA ol PARATRACHICHTHYS trailli 44. obliquissima, CUNA... 91 partita, CLATHRIA 223, 254 obsoleta, BOLIVINA ... so DUO parvula, LIMHA ... Oil ocellina, GIBBULA 92, 101 patagonica, Punvinunina... 311 ODOSTOMIA mayi 93 | PaTELua australis ... 109 ogilbyi, CHIMHRA Bool) calyptra 109 oleacea, MONILEFA ... 92, 101 PAYTELLINA corrugata Sulit olearium, CYMATIUM 94. paucilirata, MivROMORPHA 95 olivacea, ALVANIA ... goa OY paucispina, 'lHALASSODEN- olivaceus, AMPHITHALAMUS 107 DRON 202 ONOBA bassiana 108 paucispinus var. multipora, glomerosa 108 RHAPHIDOPHLUS 178, 184 00ze, GLOBIGERINA... 309 paucispinus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS OPHLITASPONGIA austra- 176, 195, 203, 300 liensis as aa 74shs} paucispinus, THALASSODEN- avinelloides 188, 268, 272 DRON oe 178, 300 chalinoides 270 paula, MIrTROMORPHA sca confragosa «ee ZOD Pecren antiaustralis soa) inornata 264, 265 Cie Bene ob wie L0G membranacea 215, 2538 pectinata, PHILOBRYA sone Aly od nidificata .., .-. 204 pectiniformis, ECHINONEMA papilla aie seey 1204: 185, 194 seriata ares .. «204 pectinoides, GLYCYMERIS ... 91 Spe ea 138, 203, 253 pedunculata, MyxILLa 144 subhispida 257, 259, 271 pellicula, CLATHRIA 208 subhispida var. vimi- pellucida, Rissoa (Noputus) 107 nalis .-. 800 naliucidus, AMPHITHALAMUS§ 107 tenuis... Bee 254, 261 PEMPHERIS affinis ... bt HO tubulosa oe 254, 272 compressu 45, 47 OpronuRwus denticulatus 38 elongata rer geo AT ORBULINA universa... 311 klunzingert ... pene mA, 328 ‘© ENDEAVOUR ”” PAGE lineatus — teks 45 macrolepis ... .. 45 mitlleri me ube 47 multiradiata 45, 14.7 mulliradiatus + 47 Unwind Hes a 48 PENTACEROPSIS recwirviros- thus... Ate abe Wl percostata, CORBIS ... 92, 99 pergradata, CANCELLARIA,... 94 perlo, HpPrRANCHIAS 2 9 perlo, SQUALUS aoe perranvosa (var.) incrustans, CRELLA 58, 159 perversidens, BArHYARCA ... 91 petterdi, AMPHITHALAMUS 105, 107 petterdi, ANCILLA ... ee 93 petterdi, Rissoa soe OY pfeifieri, 'TRIPHORA... Bt 93 PHAKELLIA flabellata sco | papyracen 261 ventilabrume ... So PHENACOLEPAS calva et 193 PHILINE columnarius noc. ON oscitans se eo OS philippensis, MONILEA so OH philippi, CENTRACION 63 2 philippi, HETERODONTUS ... 2 philippi, SQUALUS ; 2 phillipi, CORYTHROICHTHYS 26 phillipi, SYNGNATHUS ates 26 PHILOBRYA fimbriata ioe SOL pectinata ... Boo wl PHOLADOMYA arenosa fee will Puysicuuus barbatus gop palmatus ... 535)» ahs} Sp. Ae Hes to 1 piniformis, CLATHRIA .. 241 PISANIA schoutanica re 95 pistachia, ARCA oor 91 platei var. australis, CALLAN- THIAS he on. Oil platei, CALLANTHIAS seen” AOU platei, CLIONOPSIS ... ee li22 platessa, CARANX ... sasSts«) PLECTISPA arborea 208, 280, 300 (PLecTIsPA) CLATHRIA arborea 204, 280 ECHINOCLATHRIA macropord... . 204 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAGE PuEcTIsPa elegans 208, 280, 300 macropora 208, 242, 276, 277, 281, 300 multipes : 204 Sp. wee 3 Sop . 21083 PLECTROPOMA susuki Bee tS) plena, PLOCAMIA . 144 PLEURODON maorianus 91, 96 PLEUROSTOMELLA alternans 310 plewrotenia, ANTHIAS seg 0) plicata, ALLANTOPHORA 276 plicilaminatus, TROPHON ... 95 PLOCAMIA aes 145 plena ... .. 144 SiO ae eyes 144, 145, 146 PLOCAMIOPSIS, sp. 145 PLUMOHALICHONDRIA arenacea 160 australis 165, 160 cespitosa 149 gravida 139 ucrustans 152 mammillata sce» GS) microcionides 146 neptunt Wat ... 146 Sp. a 138, 142, 146 POCILLON, sp. 136, 145 poculoides, SPIRAS'TELLA 122 Pouinices beddonei Ve 94. polychotoma, CHALINA 252 PoLyMASTIA craticia ace = 29 (PomoLosus) CLupHa bassensis 16 pompilioides, NONIONINA 311 POROLEDA ensicula... oc Oil poresa, SERIOLELLA Se 8h porphyria, IMBRICARIA .... 95 PRIONACE glauca... ne 9 PRIOPIS ransayi... eo PRISTIOPHORUS cirratus ... 9 nudipinnis nae oe LO PRISTIS cirratus ... 9 probleema, CRASSATELLITES- Ol producta, CRASSATELLITES... 91 producta, KritHE 310,311 PRONUCULA decorosa foaet soil PROSOPLISMUS recurvirostris 72 prowima, NoposaRta BLL prowimus (var.) typicus, RHa- PHIDOPHLUS 185, 190 PSAMMOPEMMA crassum 287 PSEUDOAMBASSIS ramsayi ... 57 PAGH PSEUDOCLATHRIA compressa 245 Sp. 142, 143, 146 PsHUDOLABRUS cyanogenys 76 psittaculus 77 vestitus Ul PsEUDOPHYCIS bar batus 38 breviusculus ... 38 psittacula, LABRICHTHYS 77 psittacula, Laprus (‘lauroaa) 77 psittaculus, LABRUS 717 psittaculus, PSEUDOLABRUS Ud pulchella, MARGINELLA Tali pulchella, Rissoa 107 pulchellum, CARDIUM 92 pulchellus, ANTHIAS 50 pulchra, SCHISMOPE > 6 PULLENIA spheroides ee woul pulvillus, AMPHITHALAMUS — 107 pulvillus, Risso soa. LO zy PULVINULINA canariensis... 3811 crassa 311 extgua 311 patagonica Soo Selal Spe wei. 809, 310 tr wncatulinoides 311 PULVINULINA, sp. 809 pumila, CLATHRISSA 146, 168, 298 pumila, ECHINONEMA 168 pumila (var.) iierustans, CRELLA 153, 168, 298 pumila (var.) rubra, CLATH- RISSA 170, 298 pumila (var.) rubra, CRELLA 169 punctata, [ISOSILLAGO 59 punctata, SERIOLELLA 36 punctata, SILLAGO ce 160 punctatus, GASTEROSTEUS... 36 PuNCrURELLA corolla 101 demissa i 92, 101 Fumariun 92, 100, 101 galerita 101 harrissont 101 hemipsila 101 kesteveni a 101 pupoides, GUADRYINA 310 purpurea, Rissoa 108 purpurissatus, AULOPUS 22 pygmea, BOLIVINA... 310 pygmea, UVIGERINA S09 alll pyramida, CLATHRIA 239, 299 pyramida, WILSONELLA ,,, 299 INDEX. 329 PAGE pyramidata, CLio 95 pyramidatus, AMPHITHALA- MUS ree 93, 107 pyramidatus, SCROBS 107 PYRENE atkinsoni 95 aviaerata 95 beachportensis 95 calva ... 95 jauffaensis 95 PYVHEAS, sp, 152 Q quadrata, 'TURRITELLA 93 quadricostulata, LAGENA 311 quoyi, CARDITA 97 R racuti, CARDITA 98 radiatus, CHLAMYS... 96 Rata australis 10 Rasa aquila... 15 australis 10 cruciatus 14 niewhofi 15 nitida 10 waitir 12 ramosa (var.) anchoratum, ECHINONEMA 298 ramosa, HCHINOCLATHRIA 204, 252, 277, 280, 285, 300 ranosa, RASPAILIA... 144 ranvosa, WILSONELLA 298 ramsayi, AMBASSIS ... 57 ramsayi, CHANDA 58 ramsayi, PRIOPIS 57 ramsayi, PseUDOAMBASBIS.. 57 yaoull, CARDITA nae 98 raphanus, 'UECHNITELLA 809, 310 rasor, ANTHIAS 53 rasor, CHSIOPERGA ... a 50 rasov, SERRANUS... Sr 53 RASPAILIA nigra 298 paradoxa 295 ranvosa, 144 Sp. 139, 144, 295 tenwis 144 recurvatus, TROPHON 95 recurvirostris, Hisrioprerus 71 recurvirostris, PENTACEROPSIS 71 recurvirostiis, PROSOPLIMUS 72 336 ‘¢ ENDEAVOUR ” PAGE regina, 'TRIPHORA ... aoe 93 REopHAX dentaliniformis ... 310 fusiformis ... sco ult) sp. n06 --. 309 retiarium, CALLIOSTOMA ... 92 reticulata, CLATHRIOPSAMMA 177, 300 reticulata, ECHINOCHALINA 287, 289 reticulatus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS 176, 300 retrocurvata, Mirra ae 95 retusus, ACTAEON ... sists 95 RHAPHIDOPHLUS bispinosus 177, 215 cervicormis ... perma LT, (RHAPHIDOPHLUS) CLATHRIA spiculosa ... sacameliie RHAPHIDOPHLUS corallio- philus 2p S05 Wei cratitius Wits Sia erectus a Ba rath TOP oor Weftie, itty filifer, var. spinifera 187 paucispnus 176, 178, 195, 203, 300 paucispinus, var. mul- tipora set poe db eaSs paucispinus, var. mul- tiporus ... bee SA reticulatus 176, 300 ridleyt Se sco Lltsi7/ seriatus sok wader eal, Spo ener 145, 175, 205 spinifer ser Beonan ect topsenti ad a escesee LNTAL ty pica ied eee arcs typicus oe Foeme Lihat 184, 185 typicus, var. anchor- atus 185, 194, 196 typicus, var. brevis- pinus 185, 198, 300 typicus, var. favosus 186, 201 typicus. var. geminus 185, 191 typicus, var. obesus 186, 196 typicus, var. provimus 185, 190 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. PAGE typicus, var. stellifer 186, 199, 235 RHINA squatina —... en) PALO RHIZAMMINA indivisa Sea) BLO) rhomboidea, VERTICORDIA... 97 rhyllensis, RISSOINA ewe RICHARDSONIA insignis... 72 sp. Bae 500 coo 72 ridleyi, EcH1iNopicryumM 141, 151 ridleyi, RHAPHIDOPHLUS ... 187 RINGICULA australis see LS delecta ae see lds meridionalis ... 95, 112 nitida aise we, elas semrmsculpla ... 95, 118 Rissoa annulata ... =. 06 aupprowima ... - 05 badia sats Sons Oe beddomet ast 25, VLOG bicolor ae _eelOG (CINGULA) rubicunda 107 columnaria ... oe LOG cyclostoma ... 106, 108 diemenensis ... foo, Ale dubitabilis ... ee LOG filosa ... oe yoo LOS flania see “3% LOG flammea a LOG frauenfeldi ... aoe LOG frenchiensis ... 06 hulliana sce 93, 103 inbrex ae soo IOS incompleta ... inp OB lockyeri a 93, 103 (NopuLus) pellucida 107 petterdi Ae me LOT pulchella ae pace LO pulvillus miele eee LOM purpurea... ee LOS (Scross) badia sco ORE (Scross) scrobiculator 108 sophie 300 fe LOG sp. ae sate ... 104 verconiand ... 93, 104 woodsi Ba ee OS8 RIssoina flindersii ... LOG gertrudis ae stn 98 kershawi re son Oe rhyllensis ... Bore ete tasmanica ... ih ee tumida ee: aLOd INDEX. 331 PAGE PAGE robusta, SILLAGO ... =e » 60 ScHuETrTEHA scalaripinnis 80, 81 robustus, SOLEGNATHUS.... 28 Sie ance te BL rosea, LEPTOTHYRA... Pe a Oe SCISSURELLA pishrolin soe ee rosulenta, CARDITA ... aoe 97 SCOLECENCHELYS, sp, us 21 rosulenta, VENERICARDIA 92, 97 scolopax, CENTRISCUS 24 RovaLia soldanii... sop GLA scolopax, MacrorHAaMPHosu s 23 rotunda, ECHINOCLATHRIA 282 SCOLOPES moseley? ... son JG rubens, CLATHRIA 179, 203, 218, Spe) se: ae eo ay 224, 299 SCOMBER atwun at Shas 80 rubens var. dura, THALASSO- japonicus... 80 DENDRON 178, 202, SCOMBRESOX forsteri 5a 30 218, 299 scrobiculator, AMPHITHALA- rubens var. lamella, THALAS- MUS ... en Oo 1Os SODENDRON 178, 218, 300 scrobiculator, Rissoa (Scross) 108 rubens var. lamellosa, THAL- Scross pyramidatus see LOW ASSODENDRON.....__ 178 (Scross) Rissoa badia .... 107 rubens, THALASSODENDRON 218 (Scross) Rissoa serobicu- rubicunda, LABRICHTHYS ... 717 lator ~ eo OS rubicunda, Rissoa (CINGULA) 107 SPs —: oo LOS rubicundus, AMPHITHALAMUS 107 ScyYLIORHINUS Bennie 3 rubra, HCHINONEMA 161, 164, 299 sp. 3 rubra, GLOBIGERINA soo ola vincents 4. rubra (var.) incrustans, ScyLiium anale 3 CRELLA 1538, 170, 298 laticeps 6 rubra (var.) pumila, CLATH- maculatunr 3 RISSA 170, 298 vincenti 4. rubra (var.) pumila, CRELLA 169 segmentatus, 'TROPHON 95 rufus, CHILOBRANCHUS ... 18 semicincta, GILBERTIA 50 semicinctau, HyPOPLECTRODES 50 S semiradiatus, CORIARIUS 92 semisculpta, RINGIcULA 95, 118 SABANHA flammeu ... ae LOG septemfasciatus, HPINEPHELUS 49 incidata 30e LOT seriata, OPHLITASPONGIA ... 254 sabella, CEPHALOSCYLLIUM 6 seriatus, RHAPHIDOPHLUS... 177 sagittata, MARGINELLA ... 111 SERIOLELLA bilineata see sajaz, CLUPHA ae Heer ly bramu aac Saks, tae salebrosa, ALVANIA.. soo U@s} dobula oe pee PST salebrosus, AMPHITHALAMUS 108 porosa se eh oi sawed, DRILLIA wis ne OM punctata oF SSO SAXICAVA arctica ... se 92 Sp. se Pe ae 1 scabida, MicRocIona 142, 150 trevale ae oa seabida, STYLOTELLOPSIS SERRANUS raso7r ‘ sae 53 (Microciona) ... 151 setigera, XESTOLEBERIS ... 311 scabrocuneata, CYTHERE ... 311 setosa, VERTICORDIA 91, 97 scalariformis, Mirra ae | 95 sexlineatus, HOLoTES ce OO scalaripiinis, SCHUBTTA 80, 81 sexlineatus, TERAPON ce 66 scupha, ARCOPERNA aie OL SIGMOILINA schlumbergeri... 310 SCHISMOPE atkinsoni on Oe, sihama, SILLAGO ,,.. aoe 60 pulchra aa 5. silea, KALYKENTERON Ban 2 defill schlunbergeri, Si@Mo1LINA 310 SILLAGO bussensis 60, 61, 62 schoutanica, PISANIA 05 bostockii ae 60, 63 332 ‘‘ PNDEAVOUR ” PAGE burrus 23 noo OY ciliata OO G1 GZ gracilis : 60, 62 maculata PHe 59, 61 punctata Hes san SO) robusta Boe Boe K0L) sihama su son ——«(830) Sp. a0 nine ane 59 terrm@-regine... 5 SIPHONOCHINA bispic eae 275 smithiana, TURRITELLA ... 938 soldanti, ROTALIA ... soa LIL SOLEGNATHUS fasciatus 27, 28 hardwickiu... soo nes) robustus sats ba 28 spinosissimus 27, 28 SOLETELLINA hedleyr son solida, MITROMORPHA sen sophie, Rissoa ne eeELOG SPANIOPLON, sp... .. = 145 speculiger, CYPSILURUS ... 30 speculiger, Hxoc@7rus eS) speculiger, EXONAUTES ... 30 spheroides, PULLENIA ong til SPHM#RORDINA bulloides... 31] SPHYRNA lewini.... 2 9 spica, MANGILIA.... one oe spica, TRIPHORA ... 93 spictata, CLATHRIA 210, 215, 226, 229 spiculosa, CLATHRIA (RHA- PHIDOPHLUS) ... 177 spinifera (var.) filifer, RuapH- IDOPHLUS ... sso Listy spinifer, RHAPHIDOPHLUS... 177 spinosissimus, SOLEGNATHUS 27, 28 spinosissinus, SOLENOGNA- THUS eee 27 SPIRASTRELLA aleyonioides 124, 241 montiformis ... aso LI, papillosa —... son WAG poculoides... jan 12} SI verre oe jag LE) tentorioides ... soa PS vagabunda ... se 122 spongiosum, ECHINODICTYUM 142, 151 sprattus, CLUPEA ... fee uAlG squatina, KHINA ... aco |= LO SCIENTIFIC RESULTS. squatina, SQUALUS SQUATINA squatina... SQUALUS cinereus glaweus isabella perlo philippi megalops squatina stadialis Mirra E stanislaws, MARGINELLA 927 ONNDOW < 10 112 94. stellifer (var.) typicus, RHAPH- IDOPHLUS sticta, NATICA : stilla, MARGINELLA... 186, 199, 235 94. 94. STIPHONOCHALINA bispiculata 255 stipitata, LissENDENDORYX 244 striata, CLATHRIA 211 striatissima, CHIONE apo, STYLOSTICHON conulosum... 148 ins. 08s 188, 141, 145 STYLOTELLOPSIS amabilis... 151 (Microciona) eae 151 sp. , 146, 150 subdiluta, TELLINA.. x 92 SUBEROTELITES, sp. 146, 208 subfusca, BARLEEIA oe ls} subfuscus, AMPHITHALAMUS 108 subhispida, ECHINOCLATHRIA 257 subhispida, OPHLITASPONGIA 257, 259, 271 subhispida var. viminalis, OPHLITASPONGIA 3800 superba, HMARGINULA 92 superstes, CONUS 94, 111 susuki, PLECTROPOMA 49 symbiotica, AXINELLA 237 SYNAGROPS, sp. 55 SYNGNATHUS intestinalis 26 phillipi 26 SYRINGELLA, sp. 145 SYRNOLA micra 93 ay 'THNIOMEMBRAS microstoma 32 sp. ae 32 tasmanica, COCCULINA 93 tasmanica, HuLIMA 108 tasmanica, KRAUSSINA cee oh tasmanica, Mirra ... 95, 112 tasmanica, RisSOINA : ts Hee oa sft ht oh tetera ste fat se beh tite tehiele: vie > c ‘2 pis <8 267s a) Nubieha dy bysady Muda tte) Pyke hy Betty on reve! itie ’ i feat +1 etat f *, t ‘3 be 3. > 43 } f ate? at eye epee sts th Otte 4 © ee e8 et Mb fe ie ty te — ee tee ry See +. 6 + om ) 7 -* eee 0h i he Tea alate? Meter tis i* * ‘ ' atte leletett i Tee * at Tete i T. ¥? tit - 4 ae sists > > -) : t ; Pies + t > t “: ze 2 s a ht le ene , . . . ‘